Bookmarks

Yahoo Gmail Google Facebook Delicious Twitter Reddit Stumpleupon Myspace Digg

Search queries

why did Scabbers bite goyle, fuldataler mineralwasser, bikemate fahrradcomputer t52434 anleitung, frank zappa iq 172 liam gallagher 164, "heartbroke kid" "previous episode references", bikemate t52434 anleitung, marietta edgecombe cop out, kaufland autobatterie, nasi goreng in dosen kaufen, micromaxx mm 3544 universalfernbedienung

Links

XODOX
Impressum

#1: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 03:01:49 by Mac

Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
--
--Mac

Report this message

#2: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 03:21:21 by phil.gerrard1

Mac wrote:

> Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?

Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next, it's
even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested in the
upcoming film.

Best

Phil

Report this message

#3: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 05:20:05 by WQ

<a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt; Mac wrote:
&gt;
&gt; &gt; Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt;
&gt; Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next, it's
&gt; even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested in the
&gt; upcoming film.

--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
that hasn't been finished yet. You sure you guys aren't twins? In the
meantime, digest the script and review properly - am looking forward to
the bashing sessions ahead.

&gt;
&gt; Best
&gt;
&gt; Phil

Report this message

#4: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 06:51:34 by WQ

WQ wrote:
&gt; <a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt; &gt; Mac wrote:
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; &gt; Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next, it's
&gt; &gt; even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested in the
&gt; &gt; upcoming film.
&gt;
&gt; --- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt; that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt; that hasn't been finished yet. You sure you guys aren't twins? In the
&gt; meantime, digest the script and review properly - am looking forward to
&gt; the bashing sessions ahead.

--- Oh, and while we're creaming, how about:

James Bond will return in The Hildebrand Rarity

to wrap up Craig's trilogy?

&gt;
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; Best
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; Phil

Report this message

#5: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 07:11:03 by Vince

WQ wrote:
&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt;
&gt;&gt;<a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;Mac wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next, it's
&gt;&gt;&gt;even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested in the
&gt;&gt;&gt;upcoming film.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt;&gt;that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt;&gt;that hasn't been finished yet. You sure you guys aren't twins? In the
&gt;&gt;meantime, digest the script and review properly - am looking forward to
&gt;&gt;the bashing sessions ahead.
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; --- Oh, and while we're creaming, how about:
&gt;
&gt; James Bond will return in The Hildebrand Rarity
&gt;
&gt; to wrap up Craig's trilogy?
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;Best
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;Phil
&gt;
&gt;
HA!

Are you so sure he'll get that far?

CR06 might stink up so bad that EON will pay off DC and that'll be that.

--
Check out my new BLOG
Its a work in progress


<a href="http://computerpast.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://computerpast.blogspot.com/</a>


Also check out our sales page(s)

<a href="http://bondtime.tripod.com/" target="_blank">http://bondtime.tripod.com/</a>

Report this message

#6: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 11:22:06 by Mac

WQ wrote:

&gt; <a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt;&gt; Mac wrote:
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
&gt;&gt; it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
&gt;&gt; in the upcoming film.
&gt;
&gt; --- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt; that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt; that hasn't been finished yet.

I was &quot;creaming my pants&quot; over the prospect of the next film being
announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
&quot;old days&quot; you keep harping on about?
--
--Mac

Report this message

#7: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 12:20:55 by Blofelds Cat

&quot;Mac&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net" target="_blank">see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
news:<a href="mailto:4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net..." target="_blank">4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net...</a>
&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt;
&gt;&gt; <a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt; Mac wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
&gt;&gt;&gt; it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
&gt;&gt;&gt; in the upcoming film.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; --- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt;&gt; that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt;&gt; that hasn't been finished yet.
&gt;
&gt; I was &quot;creaming my pants&quot; over the prospect of the next film being
&gt; announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
&gt; &quot;old days&quot; you keep harping on about?

Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, &quot;The End of (insert current
title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned next film
here)&quot;. It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick to the proposed
titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved Me and Octopussy).
It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's the first time since The
Living Daylights to feature an original Fleming title.

It's a bit like on TV when they say, &quot;tune in next week...&quot;, gives you
something almost tangible to look forward to.

Just having, &quot;James Bond Will Return&quot; is redundant 'cos its a foregone
conclusion.

I'm hoping to one day see, &quot;The End of (film title here) But James Bond Will
Return in Quantum of Solace&quot; (which is a superb title).

cheers

Report this message

#8: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 14:39:54 by pussfeller

Blofelds Cat wrote:
&gt; &quot;Mac&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net" target="_blank">see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
&gt; news:<a href="mailto:4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net..." target="_blank">4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net...</a>
&gt; &gt; WQ wrote:
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; <a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; Mac wrote:
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; in the upcoming film.
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; --- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt; &gt;&gt; that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt; &gt;&gt; that hasn't been finished yet.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; I was &quot;creaming my pants&quot; over the prospect of the next film being
&gt; &gt; announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
&gt; &gt; &quot;old days&quot; you keep harping on about?
&gt;
&gt; Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, &quot;The End of (insert current
&gt; title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned next film
&gt; here)&quot;. It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick to the proposed
&gt; titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved Me and Octopussy).
&gt; It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's the first time since The
&gt; Living Daylights to feature an original Fleming title.
&gt;
&gt; It's a bit like on TV when they say, &quot;tune in next week...&quot;, gives you
&gt; something almost tangible to look forward to.
&gt;
&gt; Just having, &quot;James Bond Will Return&quot; is redundant 'cos its a foregone
&gt; conclusion.
&gt;
&gt; I'm hoping to one day see, &quot;The End of (film title here) But James Bond Will
&gt; Return in Quantum of Solace&quot; (which is a superb title).
&gt;
&gt; cheers

I like it too CAT but if the USA market wasn't expected to know what
&quot;REVOKED&quot; meant, how the hell are we gonna know what &quot;QUANTUM OF
SOLACE&quot; means, even less, are we gonna know how to spell it?

Report this message

#9: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 15:27:08 by WQ

Mac wrote:
&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt;
&gt; &gt; <a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt; &gt;&gt; Mac wrote:
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
&gt; &gt;&gt; it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
&gt; &gt;&gt; in the upcoming film.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; --- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt; &gt; that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt; &gt; that hasn't been finished yet.
&gt;
&gt; I was &quot;creaming my pants&quot; over the prospect of the next film being
&gt; announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
&gt; &quot;old days&quot; you keep harping on about?

--- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in the
end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now that's
creaming Big Time.

&gt; --
&gt; --Mac

Report this message

#10: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 16:16:41 by Mac

WQ wrote:

&gt; --- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in the
&gt; end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now that's
&gt; creaming Big Time.

As opposed to frothing at the mouth over the colour of a man's hair, I
suppose it is...
--
--Mac

Report this message

#11: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 16:28:09 by WQ

Mac wrote:
&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt;
&gt; &gt; --- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in the
&gt; &gt; end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now that's
&gt; &gt; creaming Big Time.
&gt;
&gt; As opposed to frothing at the mouth over the colour of a man's hair, I
&gt; suppose it is...

--- Cream of a different foam.


&gt; --
&gt; --Mac

Report this message

#12: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 16:32:42 by Mac

<a href="mailto:pussfeller&#64;cableone.net" target="_blank">pussfeller&#64;cableone.net</a> wrote:

&gt;&gt; Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, &quot;The End of (insert
&gt;&gt; current title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned
&gt;&gt; next film here)&quot;. It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick
&gt;&gt; to the proposed titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who
&gt;&gt; Loved Me and Octopussy). It's especially fitting for Casino Royale
&gt;&gt; as it's the first time since The Living Daylights to feature an
&gt;&gt; original Fleming title.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; It's a bit like on TV when they say, &quot;tune in next week...&quot;, gives
&gt;&gt; you something almost tangible to look forward to.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Just having, &quot;James Bond Will Return&quot; is redundant 'cos its a
&gt;&gt; foregone conclusion.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; I'm hoping to one day see, &quot;The End of (film title here) But James
&gt;&gt; Bond Will Return in Quantum of Solace&quot; (which is a superb title).
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; cheers
&gt;
&gt; I like it too CAT but if the USA market wasn't expected to know what
&gt; &quot;REVOKED&quot; meant, how the hell are we gonna know what &quot;QUANTUM OF
&gt; SOLACE&quot; means, even less, are we gonna know how to spell it?

LOL I agree with BC, it is an excellent title; LICENCE REVOKED wasn't.
--
--Mac

Report this message

#13: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 16:35:43 by Mac

WQ wrote:

&gt; Mac wrote:
&gt;&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; --- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in
&gt;&gt;&gt; the end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now
&gt;&gt;&gt; that's creaming Big Time.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; As opposed to frothing at the mouth over the colour of a man's hair,
&gt;&gt; I suppose it is...
&gt;
&gt; --- Cream of a different foam.

Bitter to the taste.
--
--Mac

Report this message

#14: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 16:45:13 by WQ

Mac wrote:
&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt;
&gt; &gt; Mac wrote:
&gt; &gt;&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; --- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; the end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; that's creaming Big Time.
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; As opposed to frothing at the mouth over the colour of a man's hair,
&gt; &gt;&gt; I suppose it is...
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; --- Cream of a different foam.
&gt;
&gt; Bitter to the taste.

--- I wouldn't touch that with a 10 ft. pole.

&gt; --
&gt; --Mac

Report this message

#15: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 16:53:25 by Paul Clarke

You know, WQ, you're right. Instead of getting excited at the prospect
of some real quality and excitement in the Bond film series, I should
just sit back and sneer. It's totally uncool to be an enthusiast, and
being an optimist is just not on. I'm just gonna put on my smoking
jacket, slump in my comfy chair with my scotch, and bitch and sneer and
piss and moan about the general badness of life and how anybody who
doesn't feel the same way is an idiot.

I'm sure my life will improve greatly.

*SNEER*

WQ wrote:
&gt; Mac wrote:
&gt;
&gt;&gt;WQ wrote:
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;<a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Mac wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;in the upcoming film.
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't been finished yet.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;I was &quot;creaming my pants&quot; over the prospect of the next film being
&gt;&gt;announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
&gt;&gt;&quot;old days&quot; you keep harping on about?
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; --- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in the
&gt; end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now that's
&gt; creaming Big Time.
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;&gt;--
&gt;&gt;--Mac
&gt;
&gt;

--
==007===
“My dear girl, there are some things that just aren't done, such as
drinking Dom Perignon '53 above a temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit.
That's as bad as putting a secret agent in a gorilla suit.”

Report this message

#16: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 17:22:07 by youngbond

Here's a roundup of Bond 22 (Risico? -that would be great) news and
rumor.

<a href="http://web.mac.com/zencato/iWeb/Young_Bond/News/3CEBCAC2-F114-4A37-B210-6AE485A15B2E.html" target="_blank"> http://web.mac.com/zencato/iWeb/Young_Bond/News/3CEBCAC2-F11 4-4A37-B210-6AE485A15B2E.html</a>

Report this message

#17: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 17:28:51 by WQ

Paul Clarke wrote:
&gt; You know, WQ, you're right. Instead of getting excited at the prospect
&gt; of some real quality and excitement in the Bond film series, I should
&gt; just sit back and sneer. It's totally uncool to be an enthusiast, and
&gt; being an optimist is just not on. I'm just gonna put on my smoking
&gt; jacket, slump in my comfy chair with my scotch, and bitch and sneer and
&gt; piss and moan about the general badness of life and how anybody who
&gt; doesn't feel the same way is an idiot.
&gt;
&gt; I'm sure my life will improve greatly.
&gt;
&gt; *SNEER*

--- There you go, that's the way to do it. Now just think of how much
more thrilled you'll be with the movie if after all this sneering CR
proves to be a terrific picture. It's in the expectation of any movie
being terrific that you actually set yourself up to be more often
disappointed than not. That's usually the price of optimism:
disappointment. But like I said, I've read the script and this will be
no FRWL. Downgrade it more to FYEO or TLD at best.

&gt;
&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt; &gt; Mac wrote:
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;WQ wrote:
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;<a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Mac wrote:
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;in the upcoming film.
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't been finished yet.
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;I was &quot;creaming my pants&quot; over the prospect of the next film being
&gt; &gt;&gt;announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
&gt; &gt;&gt;&quot;old days&quot; you keep harping on about?
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; --- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in the
&gt; &gt; end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now that's
&gt; &gt; creaming Big Time.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;--
&gt; &gt;&gt;--Mac
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;
&gt;
&gt; --
&gt; ==007===
&gt; &quot;My dear girl, there are some things that just aren't done, such as
&gt; drinking Dom Perignon '53 above a temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit.
&gt; That's as bad as putting a secret agent in a gorilla suit.&quot;

Report this message

#18: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 17:33:31 by Mac

WQ wrote:

&gt; --- There you go, that's the way to do it. Now just think of how much
&gt; more thrilled you'll be with the movie if after all this sneering CR
&gt; proves to be a terrific picture. It's in the expectation of any movie
&gt; being terrific that you actually set yourself up to be more often
&gt; disappointed than not. That's usually the price of optimism:
&gt; disappointment. But like I said, I've read the script and this will
&gt; be no FRWL. Downgrade it more to FYEO or TLD at best.

I've not read it yet, but this is quite encouraging. Coming from
you, more so.
--
--Mac

Report this message

#19: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 17:46:44 by Vince

Blofelds Cat wrote:

&gt; &quot;Mac&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net" target="_blank">see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
&gt; news:<a href="mailto:4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net..." target="_blank">4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net...</a>
&gt;
&gt;&gt;WQ wrote:
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;<a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Mac wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;in the upcoming film.
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't been finished yet.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;I was &quot;creaming my pants&quot; over the prospect of the next film being
&gt;&gt;announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
&gt;&gt;&quot;old days&quot; you keep harping on about?
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, &quot;The End of (insert current
&gt; title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned next film
&gt; here)&quot;. It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick to the proposed
&gt; titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved Me and Octopussy).
&gt; It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's the first time since The
&gt; Living Daylights to feature an original Fleming title.
&gt;
&gt; It's a bit like on TV when they say, &quot;tune in next week...&quot;, gives you
&gt; something almost tangible to look forward to.
&gt;
&gt; Just having, &quot;James Bond Will Return&quot; is redundant 'cos its a foregone
&gt; conclusion.
&gt;

Such wasn't the case in 1989


--
Check out my new BLOG
Its a work in progress


<a href="http://computerpast.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://computerpast.blogspot.com/</a>


Also check out our sales page(s)

<a href="http://bondtime.tripod.com/" target="_blank">http://bondtime.tripod.com/</a>

Report this message

#20: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 18:00:47 by WQ

Mac wrote:
&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt;
&gt; &gt; --- There you go, that's the way to do it. Now just think of how much
&gt; &gt; more thrilled you'll be with the movie if after all this sneering CR
&gt; &gt; proves to be a terrific picture. It's in the expectation of any movie
&gt; &gt; being terrific that you actually set yourself up to be more often
&gt; &gt; disappointed than not. That's usually the price of optimism:
&gt; &gt; disappointment. But like I said, I've read the script and this will
&gt; &gt; be no FRWL. Downgrade it more to FYEO or TLD at best.
&gt;
&gt; I've not read it yet, but this is quite encouraging. Coming from
&gt; you, more so.

--- If downgrading is encouraging, then okay. At least you're happy.

&gt; --
&gt; --Mac

Report this message

#21: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 19:26:33 by Mac

WQ wrote:

&gt; Mac wrote:
&gt;&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; --- There you go, that's the way to do it. Now just think of how
&gt;&gt;&gt; much more thrilled you'll be with the movie if after all this
&gt;&gt;&gt; sneering CR proves to be a terrific picture. It's in the
&gt;&gt;&gt; expectation of any movie being terrific that you actually set
&gt;&gt;&gt; yourself up to be more often disappointed than not. That's usually
&gt;&gt;&gt; the price of optimism: disappointment. But like I said, I've read
&gt;&gt;&gt; the script and this will be no FRWL. Downgrade it more to FYEO or
&gt;&gt;&gt; TLD at best.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; I've not read it yet, but this is quite encouraging. Coming from
&gt;&gt; you, more so.
&gt;
&gt; --- If downgrading is encouraging, then okay. At least you're happy.

Only as far as you're concerned, because you've been negative from
the start. I happen to like FOR YOUR EYES ONLY and THE LIVING
DAYLIGHTS, but you never watch them; You'd rather watch DIAMONDS
ARE FOREVER and YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE.

Me? I'll wait to decide if I am happy November 17th.
--
--Mac

Report this message

#22: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 19:39:19 by Paul Clarke

WQ wrote:
&gt; Paul Clarke wrote:
&gt;
&gt;&gt;You know, WQ, you're right. Instead of getting excited at the prospect
&gt;&gt;of some real quality and excitement in the Bond film series, I should
&gt;&gt;just sit back and sneer. It's totally uncool to be an enthusiast, and
&gt;&gt;being an optimist is just not on. I'm just gonna put on my smoking
&gt;&gt;jacket, slump in my comfy chair with my scotch, and bitch and sneer and
&gt;&gt;piss and moan about the general badness of life and how anybody who
&gt;&gt;doesn't feel the same way is an idiot.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;I'm sure my life will improve greatly.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;*SNEER*
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; --- There you go, that's the way to do it. Now just think of how much
&gt; more thrilled you'll be with the movie if after all this sneering CR
&gt; proves to be a terrific picture. It's in the expectation of any movie
&gt; being terrific that you actually set yourself up to be more often
&gt; disappointed than not. That's usually the price of optimism:
&gt; disappointment.

I'm sure I can live with the side-effect of turning into a tiresome,
negative tosspot that never looks forward to anything and no-one wants
to listen to or be around.

--
==007===
“My dear girl, there are some things that just aren't done, such as
drinking Dom Perignon '53 above a temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit.
That's as bad as putting a secret agent in a gorilla suit.”

Report this message

#23: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 19:43:03 by WQ

Mac wrote:
&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt;
&gt; &gt; Mac wrote:
&gt; &gt;&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; --- There you go, that's the way to do it. Now just think of how
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; much more thrilled you'll be with the movie if after all this
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; sneering CR proves to be a terrific picture. It's in the
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; expectation of any movie being terrific that you actually set
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; yourself up to be more often disappointed than not. That's usually
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; the price of optimism: disappointment. But like I said, I've read
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; the script and this will be no FRWL. Downgrade it more to FYEO or
&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; TLD at best.
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt; I've not read it yet, but this is quite encouraging. Coming from
&gt; &gt;&gt; you, more so.
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; --- If downgrading is encouraging, then okay. At least you're happy.
&gt;
&gt; Only as far as you're concerned, because you've been negative from
&gt; the start. I happen to like FOR YOUR EYES ONLY and THE LIVING
&gt; DAYLIGHTS, but you never watch them; You'd rather watch DIAMONDS
&gt; ARE FOREVER and YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE.
&gt;
&gt; Me? I'll wait to decide if I am happy November 17th.

--- Optimism = disappointment usually; negativity = possibly being very
much surprised. Which would I prefer, being usually disappointed or
possibly very much surprised? Tough call.

FYEO is fine, but Moore as Bond still precludes it from my wanting it
as a DVD, though I'll watch it on the tube whenever it airs. Same goes
for TLD. DAF and YOLT are not top Connery entries, but hey, it's
Connery. Even NSNA qualifies as a keeper, as dull as that film is.
When I get down to it, the deciding factor as to what's a Bond keeper
for me is the actor playing Bond, which actually then outweighs any
real merits of a Bond film itself without the right actor in it. I can
handle Connery in a mediocre Bond film, I can't do the same for the
others. If Lazenby had done more, maybe I'd be able to take him as
well. If CR proves to be a terrific story, Craig as Bond will likely
preclude my wanting to have a DVD copy of it - unless he's
exceptionally fantastic in the role and a credible Bond in his own
right. But that's a tall order for the shortest Bond of all to fill.
Still, as negative as I am, I'm open to being very much surprised. Who
needs the disappointment of optimism?

&gt; --
&gt; --Mac

Report this message

#24: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 19:46:13 by WQ

Paul Clarke wrote:
&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt; &gt; Paul Clarke wrote:
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;You know, WQ, you're right. Instead of getting excited at the prospect
&gt; &gt;&gt;of some real quality and excitement in the Bond film series, I should
&gt; &gt;&gt;just sit back and sneer. It's totally uncool to be an enthusiast, and
&gt; &gt;&gt;being an optimist is just not on. I'm just gonna put on my smoking
&gt; &gt;&gt;jacket, slump in my comfy chair with my scotch, and bitch and sneer and
&gt; &gt;&gt;piss and moan about the general badness of life and how anybody who
&gt; &gt;&gt;doesn't feel the same way is an idiot.
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;I'm sure my life will improve greatly.
&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt; &gt;&gt;*SNEER*
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt;
&gt; &gt; --- There you go, that's the way to do it. Now just think of how much
&gt; &gt; more thrilled you'll be with the movie if after all this sneering CR
&gt; &gt; proves to be a terrific picture. It's in the expectation of any movie
&gt; &gt; being terrific that you actually set yourself up to be more often
&gt; &gt; disappointed than not. That's usually the price of optimism:
&gt; &gt; disappointment.
&gt;
&gt; I'm sure I can live with the side-effect of turning into a tiresome,
&gt; negative tosspot that never looks forward to anything and no-one wants
&gt; to listen to or be around.

--- Speak for yourself. Me, I'm trying to get rid of all these people
wanting to spend too much time with me. What is it about my negativity
that just draws them to me?

&gt;
&gt; --
&gt; ==007===
&gt; &quot;My dear girl, there are some things that just aren't done, such as
&gt; drinking Dom Perignon '53 above a temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit.
&gt; That's as bad as putting a secret agent in a gorilla suit.&quot;

Report this message

#25: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 20:58:13 by Blofelds Cat

&quot;WQ&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:wq&#64;email.com" target="_blank">wq&#64;email.com</a>&gt; wrote in message
news:<a href="mailto:1153320313.633863.179150&#64;p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com..." target="_blank">1153320313.633863.179150&#64;p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...</a>
&gt;
&gt; Mac wrote:
&gt;&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; &gt; Mac wrote:
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; --- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; the end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt; that's creaming Big Time.
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; As opposed to frothing at the mouth over the colour of a man's hair,
&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt; I suppose it is...
&gt;&gt; &gt;
&gt;&gt; &gt; --- Cream of a different foam.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Bitter to the taste.
&gt;
&gt; --- I wouldn't touch that with a 10 ft. pole.

I doubt you'd find a person of such bearing in Poland ...or anywhere else
for that matter.

Report this message

#26: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 21:02:51 by Blofelds Cat

&gt; ...But that's a tall order for the shortest Bond of all to fill.

Maybe a 10ft Pole would be more to your liking.

(sorry, not being adversarial, just couldn't resist squeezing every last
drop out of an appalling pun)

Report this message

#27: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 21:09:12 by Blofelds Cat

&quot;VINCE&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net" target="_blank">Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
news:bvsvg.25$<a href="mailto:FI7.7&#64;fe10.lga..." target="_blank">FI7.7&#64;fe10.lga...</a>
&gt; Blofelds Cat wrote:
&gt;
&gt;&gt; &quot;Mac&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net" target="_blank">see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
&gt;&gt; news:<a href="mailto:4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net..." target="_blank">4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net...</a>
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;WQ wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Mac wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;in the upcoming film.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't been finished yet.
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;I was &quot;creaming my pants&quot; over the prospect of the next film being
&gt;&gt;&gt;announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
&gt;&gt;&gt;&quot;old days&quot; you keep harping on about?
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, &quot;The End of (insert current
&gt;&gt; title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned next film
&gt;&gt; here)&quot;. It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick to the
&gt;&gt; proposed titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved Me and
&gt;&gt; Octopussy). It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's the first
&gt;&gt; time since The Living Daylights to feature an original Fleming title.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; It's a bit like on TV when they say, &quot;tune in next week...&quot;, gives you
&gt;&gt; something almost tangible to look forward to.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Just having, &quot;James Bond Will Return&quot; is redundant 'cos its a foregone
&gt;&gt; conclusion.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;
&gt; Such wasn't the case in 1989

Haven't they made a Bond since 1989 then?

Seriously though there was no way any of us could have known, as we watched
the final frames of the last reel of LTK, that a shit-fight was about to
take place. In any case there was never any doubt in my mind that James Bond
would return.

cheers.

Report this message

#28: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 21:40:40 by Vince

Blofelds Cat wrote:
&gt; &quot;VINCE&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net" target="_blank">Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
&gt; news:bvsvg.25$<a href="mailto:FI7.7&#64;fe10.lga..." target="_blank">FI7.7&#64;fe10.lga...</a>
&gt;
&gt;&gt;Blofelds Cat wrote:
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&quot;Mac&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net" target="_blank">see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
&gt;&gt;&gt;news:<a href="mailto:4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net..." target="_blank">4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net...</a>
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;WQ wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Mac wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;in the upcoming film.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't been finished yet.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;I was &quot;creaming my pants&quot; over the prospect of the next film being
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&quot;old days&quot; you keep harping on about?
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, &quot;The End of (insert current
&gt;&gt;&gt;title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned next film
&gt;&gt;&gt;here)&quot;. It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick to the
&gt;&gt;&gt;proposed titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved Me and
&gt;&gt;&gt;Octopussy). It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's the first
&gt;&gt;&gt;time since The Living Daylights to feature an original Fleming title.
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;It's a bit like on TV when they say, &quot;tune in next week...&quot;, gives you
&gt;&gt;&gt;something almost tangible to look forward to.
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;Just having, &quot;James Bond Will Return&quot; is redundant 'cos its a foregone
&gt;&gt;&gt;conclusion.
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;Such wasn't the case in 1989
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; Haven't they made a Bond since 1989 then?
&gt;
&gt; Seriously though there was no way any of us could have known, as we watched
&gt; the final frames of the last reel of LTK, that a shit-fight was about to
&gt; take place. In any case there was never any doubt in my mind that James Bond
&gt; would return.
&gt;
&gt; cheers.
&gt;
&gt;
True but it was a SIX YEAR wait and now its been a FOUR YEAR wait and
what do we get?...............Oh everyone here knows how I feel!


--
Check out my new BLOG
Its a work in progress


<a href="http://computerpast.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://computerpast.blogspot.com/</a>


Also check out our sales page(s)

<a href="http://bondtime.tripod.com/" target="_blank">http://bondtime.tripod.com/</a>

Report this message

#29: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 21:56:07 by Blofelds Cat

&quot;VINCE&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net" target="_blank">Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
news:wWvvg.35$<a href="mailto:FI7.19&#64;fe10.lga..." target="_blank">FI7.19&#64;fe10.lga...</a>
&gt; Blofelds Cat wrote:
&gt;&gt; &quot;VINCE&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net" target="_blank">Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
&gt;&gt; news:bvsvg.25$<a href="mailto:FI7.7&#64;fe10.lga..." target="_blank">FI7.7&#64;fe10.lga...</a>
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;Blofelds Cat wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&quot;Mac&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net" target="_blank">see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;news:<a href="mailto:4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net..." target="_blank">4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net...</a>
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;WQ wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Mac wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;in the upcoming film.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't been finished yet.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;I was &quot;creaming my pants&quot; over the prospect of the next film being
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&quot;old days&quot; you keep harping on about?
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, &quot;The End of (insert current
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned next film
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;here)&quot;. It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick to the
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;proposed titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved Me and
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Octopussy). It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's the first
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;time since The Living Daylights to feature an original Fleming title.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;It's a bit like on TV when they say, &quot;tune in next week...&quot;, gives you
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;something almost tangible to look forward to.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Just having, &quot;James Bond Will Return&quot; is redundant 'cos its a foregone
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;conclusion.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;Such wasn't the case in 1989
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Haven't they made a Bond since 1989 then?
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Seriously though there was no way any of us could have known, as we
&gt;&gt; watched the final frames of the last reel of LTK, that a shit-fight was
&gt;&gt; about to take place. In any case there was never any doubt in my mind
&gt;&gt; that James Bond would return.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; cheers.
&gt; True but it was a SIX YEAR wait and now its been a FOUR YEAR wait and what
&gt; do we get?...............Oh everyone here knows how I feel!

Well, I hope you get a pleasant surprise. I'm optimistic even though I have
been sorely disappointed with the last two films.

Report this message

#30: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 22:14:28 by Vince

Blofelds Cat wrote:

&gt; &quot;VINCE&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net" target="_blank">Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
&gt; news:wWvvg.35$<a href="mailto:FI7.19&#64;fe10.lga..." target="_blank">FI7.19&#64;fe10.lga...</a>
&gt;
&gt;&gt;Blofelds Cat wrote:
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&quot;VINCE&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net" target="_blank">Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
&gt;&gt;&gt;news:bvsvg.25$<a href="mailto:FI7.7&#64;fe10.lga..." target="_blank">FI7.7&#64;fe10.lga...</a>
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Blofelds Cat wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&quot;Mac&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net" target="_blank">see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;news:<a href="mailto:4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net..." target="_blank">4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net...</a>
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;WQ wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Mac wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;in the upcoming film.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't been finished yet.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;I was &quot;creaming my pants&quot; over the prospect of the next film being
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&quot;old days&quot; you keep harping on about?
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, &quot;The End of (insert current
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned next film
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;here)&quot;. It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick to the
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;proposed titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved Me and
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Octopussy). It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's the first
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;time since The Living Daylights to feature an original Fleming title.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;It's a bit like on TV when they say, &quot;tune in next week...&quot;, gives you
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;something almost tangible to look forward to.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Just having, &quot;James Bond Will Return&quot; is redundant 'cos its a foregone
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;conclusion.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Such wasn't the case in 1989
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;Haven't they made a Bond since 1989 then?
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;Seriously though there was no way any of us could have known, as we
&gt;&gt;&gt;watched the final frames of the last reel of LTK, that a shit-fight was
&gt;&gt;&gt;about to take place. In any case there was never any doubt in my mind
&gt;&gt;&gt;that James Bond would return.
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;cheers.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;True but it was a SIX YEAR wait and now its been a FOUR YEAR wait and what
&gt;&gt;do we get?...............Oh everyone here knows how I feel!
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; Well, I hope you get a pleasant surprise. I'm optimistic even though I have
&gt; been sorely disappointed with the last two films.
&gt;
&gt;
&gt;
You're missing the point, I DON'T LIKE CRAIG PERIOD.
No more then I liked the last FOUR actors who played Batman.
Need I say more?

--
Check out my new BLOG
Its a work in progress


<a href="http://computerpast.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">http://computerpast.blogspot.com/</a>


Also check out our sales page(s)

<a href="http://bondtime.tripod.com/" target="_blank">http://bondtime.tripod.com/</a>

Report this message

#31: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 22:22:31 by Paul Clarke

VINCE wrote:

&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Well, I hope you get a pleasant surprise. I'm optimistic even though I
&gt;&gt; have been sorely disappointed with the last two films.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt; You're missing the point, I DON'T LIKE CRAIG PERIOD.
&gt; No more then I liked the last FOUR actors who played Batman.
&gt; Need I say more?

Please don't. My eyes are glazing over.

Anyways, who is this Craig Period chap you're going on about?


--
==007===
“My dear girl, there are some things that just aren't done, such as
drinking Dom Perignon '53 above a temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit.
That's as bad as putting a secret agent in a gorilla suit.”

Report this message

#32: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 23:09:56 by Blofelds Cat

&quot;VINCE&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net" target="_blank">Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
news:nqwvg.42$<a href="mailto:6q.35&#64;fe12.lga..." target="_blank">6q.35&#64;fe12.lga...</a>
&gt; Blofelds Cat wrote:
&gt;
&gt;&gt; &quot;VINCE&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net" target="_blank">Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
&gt;&gt; news:wWvvg.35$<a href="mailto:FI7.19&#64;fe10.lga..." target="_blank">FI7.19&#64;fe10.lga...</a>
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;Blofelds Cat wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&quot;VINCE&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net" target="_blank">Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;news:bvsvg.25$<a href="mailto:FI7.7&#64;fe10.lga..." target="_blank">FI7.7&#64;fe10.lga...</a>
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Blofelds Cat wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&quot;Mac&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net" target="_blank">see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net</a>&gt; wrote in message
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;news:<a href="mailto:4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net..." target="_blank">4i6butF2bi1vU1&#64;individual.net...</a>
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;WQ wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;<a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Mac wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;in the upcoming film.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;something
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't been finished yet.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;I was &quot;creaming my pants&quot; over the prospect of the next film being
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;the
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&quot;old days&quot; you keep harping on about?
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, &quot;The End of (insert
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;current title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;next film here)&quot;. It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;to the proposed titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Me and Octopussy). It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;the first time since The Living Daylights to feature an original
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Fleming title.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;It's a bit like on TV when they say, &quot;tune in next week...&quot;, gives you
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;something almost tangible to look forward to.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Just having, &quot;James Bond Will Return&quot; is redundant 'cos its a foregone
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;conclusion.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Such wasn't the case in 1989
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Haven't they made a Bond since 1989 then?
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Seriously though there was no way any of us could have known, as we
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;watched the final frames of the last reel of LTK, that a shit-fight was
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;about to take place. In any case there was never any doubt in my mind
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;that James Bond would return.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;cheers.
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;True but it was a SIX YEAR wait and now its been a FOUR YEAR wait and
&gt;&gt;&gt;what do we get?...............Oh everyone here knows how I feel!
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; Well, I hope you get a pleasant surprise. I'm optimistic even though I
&gt;&gt; have been sorely disappointed with the last two films.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt; You're missing the point, I DON'T LIKE CRAIG PERIOD.
&gt; No more then I liked the last FOUR actors who played Batman.
&gt; Need I say more?

Up until the post to which I am responding, I was unaware that you didn't
like Craig Period. Is Mr Period the next actor to play Batman then?

(The point of the above seemingly flippant paragraph is that one should
never assume that just because YOU know your viewpoint, everyone does. There
was no way that I could miss a point that I could not see in the first
place.)

cheers.

Report this message

#33: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 23:10:36 by Blofelds Cat

&quot;Paul Clarke&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:jim_caerleon&#64;hotmail.com" target="_blank">jim_caerleon&#64;hotmail.com</a>&gt; wrote in message
news:bwwvg.117468$<a href="mailto:I61.68961&#64;clgrps13..." target="_blank">I61.68961&#64;clgrps13...</a>
&gt; VINCE wrote:
&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; Well, I hope you get a pleasant surprise. I'm optimistic even though I
&gt;&gt;&gt; have been sorely disappointed with the last two films.
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; You're missing the point, I DON'T LIKE CRAIG PERIOD.
&gt;&gt; No more then I liked the last FOUR actors who played Batman.
&gt;&gt; Need I say more?
&gt;
&gt; Please don't. My eyes are glazing over.
&gt;
&gt; Anyways, who is this Craig Period chap you're going on about?

Bugger!

Should have read your answer before posting mine.

Report this message

#34: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-19 23:21:38 by Paul Clarke

Blofelds Cat wrote:
&gt; &quot;Paul Clarke&quot; &lt;<a href="mailto:jim_caerleon&#64;hotmail.com" target="_blank">jim_caerleon&#64;hotmail.com</a>&gt; wrote in message
&gt; news:bwwvg.117468$<a href="mailto:I61.68961&#64;clgrps13..." target="_blank">I61.68961&#64;clgrps13...</a>
&gt;
&gt;&gt;VINCE wrote:
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;Well, I hope you get a pleasant surprise. I'm optimistic even though I
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;have been sorely disappointed with the last two films.
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;You're missing the point, I DON'T LIKE CRAIG PERIOD.
&gt;&gt;&gt;No more then I liked the last FOUR actors who played Batman.
&gt;&gt;&gt;Need I say more?
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;Please don't. My eyes are glazing over.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;Anyways, who is this Craig Period chap you're going on about?
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; Bugger!
&gt;
&gt; Should have read your answer before posting mine.
&gt;

LOL! And Vince should have read &quot;Eats, Shoots and Leaves&quot; to learn about
the importance of punctuation.


--
==007===
“My dear girl, there are some things that just aren't done, such as
drinking Dom Perignon '53 above a temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit.
That's as bad as putting a secret agent in a gorilla suit.”

Report this message

#35: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-20 02:06:29 by phil.gerrard1

WQ wrote:

&gt; --- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt; that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt; that hasn't been finished yet.

What Mac said. I'd be welcoming 'James Bond will return in...' in
itself even if I thought CR was going to be godawful.

&gt; You sure you guys aren't twins?

Get us started on LTK sometime. Stand well back.

&gt; In the meantime, digest the script and review properly - am looking forward to
&gt; the bashing sessions ahead.

So far I've managed a couple of initial skims, which I think are always
helpful when reading a film, TV, or theatre script for the first time
anyway. I won't manage a fully detailled read for a few days yet. My
first impressions are that your touchstones of TLD and FYEO are pretty
well correct, although I think this may be better than both. And no,
it's not FRWL, but as a *screenplay* I feel it may turn out to be the
one I've liked best since OHMSS.

Best

Phil

Report this message

#36: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-20 02:29:52 by WQ

<a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt;
&gt; &gt; --- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt; &gt; that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt; &gt; that hasn't been finished yet.
&gt;
&gt; What Mac said. I'd be welcoming 'James Bond will return in...' in
&gt; itself even if I thought CR was going to be godawful.
&gt;
&gt; &gt; You sure you guys aren't twins?
&gt;
&gt; Get us started on LTK sometime. Stand well back.
&gt;
&gt; &gt; In the meantime, digest the script and review properly - am looking forward to
&gt; &gt; the bashing sessions ahead.
&gt;
&gt; So far I've managed a couple of initial skims, which I think are always
&gt; helpful when reading a film, TV, or theatre script for the first time
&gt; anyway. I won't manage a fully detailled read for a few days yet. My
&gt; first impressions are that your touchstones of TLD and FYEO are pretty
&gt; well correct, although I think this may be better than both. And no,
&gt; it's not FRWL, but as a *screenplay* I feel it may turn out to be the
&gt; one I've liked best since OHMSS.
&gt;

--- I'll reserve my 2 cents worth till you're really done with it.

&gt; Best
&gt;
&gt; Phil

Report this message

#37: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-20 05:18:03 by JHause

Why? You sent them the CR script you wrote in your mom's basement?

Report this message

#38: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-20 05:20:28 by JHause

WQ wrote:
&gt;
&gt; --- I'll reserve my 2 cents worth till you're really done with it.
&gt;

You have to wait on two cents? I guess writing scripts in your mom's
basement doesn't pay very well.

Report this message

#39: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-20 05:21:56 by JHause

Because there's nothing more fun than kicking the hot air out of a
windbag.

Report this message

#40: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-21 03:03:49 by Rich Handley

VINCE &lt;<a href="mailto:Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net" target="_blank">Holvbphoto&#64;optonline.net</a>&gt; said:
&gt;WQ wrote:
&gt;&gt; WQ wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt;&gt;&gt;that hasn't been finished yet. You sure you guys aren't twins? In the
&gt;&gt;&gt;meantime, digest the script and review properly - am looking forward to
&gt;&gt;&gt;the bashing sessions ahead.
&gt;&gt; --- Oh, and while we're creaming, how about:
&gt;&gt; James Bond will return in The Hildebrand Rarity
&gt;&gt; to wrap up Craig's trilogy?

Vince is talking to himself again.

Report this message

#41: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-21 07:33:10 by JHause

Columbia Pictures and MGM Announce May 2, 2008 Release Date for 22nd
James Bond Adventure Starring Daniel Craig

CULVER CITY, Calif., July 20 /PRNewswire/ -- It was announced today by
producers Michael G. Wilson and Barbara Broccoli, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer
Inc. and Sony Pictures Entertainment, that the 22nd James Bond
adventure will be released by Columbia Pictures on May 2, 2008 with
Daniel Craig reprising the role of the legendary British secret agent.

The story for the latest James Bond film produced by the franchise
holders, EON Productions has yet to be announced. &quot;As we wrap
production on CASINO ROYALE we couldn't be more excited about the
direction the franchise is heading with Daniel Craig. Daniel has taken
the origins of Ian Fleming's James Bond portraying, with emotional
complexity, a darker and edgier 007,&quot; said Wilson and Broccoli.

Official Press Release from EON PRODUCTIONS LTD, MGM and SONY

Report this message

#42: Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO"

Posted on 2006-07-22 06:16:58 by ahk

At 10:22am +0100, 07/19/06, Mac &lt;<a href="mailto:see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net" target="_blank">see.mac&#64;SPAMLESSvirgin.net</a>&gt; wrote:
&gt;WQ wrote:
&gt;
&gt;&gt; <a href="mailto:phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com" target="_blank">phil.gerrard&#64;ntlworld.com</a> wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt; Mac wrote:
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
&gt;&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt;&gt; Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
&gt;&gt;&gt; it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
&gt;&gt;&gt; in the upcoming film.
&gt;&gt;
&gt;&gt; --- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
&gt;&gt; that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
&gt;&gt; that hasn't been finished yet.
&gt;
&gt;I was &quot;creaming my pants&quot; over the prospect of the next film being
&gt;announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
&gt;&quot;old days&quot; you keep harping on about?

I'm holding out for the United Artists logo to return!

Report this message