| bands who didn't go crap [message #9723] |
Mo, 04 April 2005 01:05 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9725 ] |
Mo, 04 April 2005 02:41 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9726 ] |
Mo, 04 April 2005 03:24 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9729 ] |
Mo, 04 April 2005 07:48 |
|
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:05:05 GMT, rooner in space
<wowfabgroovy [at] wowmail.com> wrote about "bands who didn't go crap" :
>cockney rejects
turned into a terrible hard rock band
RAMONES need to be added to the list
np: Winamp stopped
--
Ralf Sandner | ralf.usenet [at] murderdisco.de | http://www.murderdisco.de/
------------------------------------------------------------ ------------
" leave corporate rock fests to the squares, children and poseurs
they were designed for " [ Simon XXX in alt.punk ]
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9730 ] |
Mo, 04 April 2005 08:32 |
|
On Sun, 03 Apr 2005 23:05:05 GMT, rooner in space
<wowfabgroovy [at] wowmail.com> wrote:
>with nothing better to do, i'm trying to make a list of bands who
>recorded at least 2 albums, and didn't significantly change their
>style of music. learning to play is ok, but playing a completely
>different type of music isn't.
>
>they don't need to be punk bands, and just to stay on topic they can
>even be white power bands. but they must have played the same type of
>music for their entire life, and must have recorded at least 2 albums.
>
>the ones i can think of are:
>
>the rezillos (if you ignore the revillos crap)
>cockney rejects
>detestation
>tom robinson band
>dead kennedys
>doom
Nirvana - Kurt and his shotgun made certain that they never had the
chance to go crap.
--
"Interviewing Avril Lavigne is like being hit over the head
with a shovel - an unpleasant experience, which leaves you
feeling dazed and hoping it never happens again."
-- Belfast Telegraph
np: Donnas - Huff All Night
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9732 ] |
Mo, 04 April 2005 09:25 |
|
Riff wrote:
> In alt.skinheads, rooner in space <wowfabgroovy [at] wowmail.com> typed:
>
>> with nothing better to do, i'm trying to make a list of bands who
>> recorded at least 2 albums, and didn't significantly change their
>> style of music. learning to play is ok, but playing a completely
>> different type of music isn't.
>>
>> they don't need to be punk bands, and just to stay on topic they can
>> even be white power bands. but they must have played the same type of
>> music for their entire life, and must have recorded at least 2
>> albums.
>>
>> the ones i can think of are:
>>
>> the rezillos (if you ignore the revillos crap)
>> cockney rejects
>
> Only had 2 good albums (+ a 3rd live one). They then got the
> heavy/hard rock bug like so many others from that genre. Their latest
> offering isn't quite as bad as some of the others, though.
>
>> detestation
>> tom robinson band
>> dead kennedys
>> doom
Minot Threat.
--
Andrew [at] Rockface
np: (Winamp is not active ;-)
www.rockface-records.co.uk
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9733 ] |
Mo, 04 April 2005 09:56 |
|
rooner in space wrote:
> with nothing better to do, i'm trying to make a list of bands who
> recorded at least 2 albums, and didn't significantly change their
> style of music. learning to play is ok, but playing a completely
> different type of music isn't.
Sugarcubes- split up before going crapy
Mudhoney- still on the same strange trip
QUOTSA- ...
Monster Magnet
The Specials- I'm just wearing their T-Shirt :)
The Crass- Haven't heard "10 notes on a Summer's day" yet though
Minimal Compact
Slime- Monsters of Punk from Germany
Talking Heads
Tangerine Dream
....this list could be carried on and on and on. Would maybe be wiser to
limit it to punkrock bands.
..m
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9735 ] |
Mo, 04 April 2005 10:44 |
|
mattie wrote:
> rooner in space wrote:
>> with nothing better to do, i'm trying to make a list of bands who
>> recorded at least 2 albums, and didn't significantly change their
>> style of music. learning to play is ok, but playing a completely
>> different type of music isn't.
>
> Sugarcubes- split up before going crapy
>
> Mudhoney- still on the same strange trip
>
> QUOTSA- ...
Kyuss.
> Monster Magnet
>
> The Specials- I'm just wearing their T-Shirt :)
>
> The Crass- Haven't heard "10 notes on a Summer's day" yet though
>
> Minimal Compact
>
> Slime- Monsters of Punk from Germany
>
> Talking Heads
>
> Tangerine Dream
>
> ...this list could be carried on and on and on. Would maybe be wiser
> to limit it to punkrock bands.
> .m
I think you're right Mattie.
--
Andrew [at] Rockface
np: (Winamp is not active ;-)
www.rockface-records.co.uk
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9741 ] |
Mo, 04 April 2005 14:19 |
|
Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
> mattie wrote:
>>QUOTSA- ...
>
>
> Kyuss.
Aww. Right. Always forget about that. But at least they started as a new
band with their new music.
..m
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9742 ] |
Mo, 04 April 2005 15:14 |
|
mattie wrote:
> Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
>> mattie wrote:
>>> QUOTSA- ...
>>
>>
>> Kyuss.
>
> Aww. Right. Always forget about that. But at least they started as a
> new band with their new music.
> .m
I really like Kyuss. haven't got any QOTSA yet, but that will change - which
album first?
--
Andrew [at] Rockface
np: (Winamp is not active ;-)
www.rockface-records.co.uk
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9743 ] |
Mo, 04 April 2005 17:50 |
|
Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
> mattie wrote:
>
>>Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
>>
>>>mattie wrote:
>>>
>>>>QUOTSA- ...
>>>
>>>
>>>Kyuss.
>>
>>Aww. Right. Always forget about that. But at least they started as a
>>new band with their new music.
>>.m
>
>
> I really like Kyuss. haven't got any QOTSA yet, but that will change - which
> album first?
>
I haven't heard the new one yet, but of the ones which were are out
before, definitely "Songs for The Deaf". Actually it was the first time
in years that I had bought a record by a contemporary American rock
band. I Had seen them live on TV and it had blow me away.
..m
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9744 ] |
Mo, 04 April 2005 18:02 |
|
Ralf Sandner wrote:
>
> RAMONES need to be added to the list
>
I'm totally retarted for the Ramones but I'll admit Acid Eaters teh
su><0rd
Cam
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9745 ] |
Mo, 04 April 2005 18:50 |
|
mattie wrote:
> Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
>> mattie wrote:
>>
>>> Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
>>>
>>>> mattie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> QUOTSA- ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Kyuss.
>>>
>>> Aww. Right. Always forget about that. But at least they started as a
>>> new band with their new music.
>>> .m
>>
>>
>> I really like Kyuss. haven't got any QOTSA yet, but that will change
>> - which album first?
>>
>
> I haven't heard the new one yet, but of the ones which were are out
> before, definitely "Songs for The Deaf". Actually it was the first
> time in years that I had bought a record by a contemporary American
> rock band. I Had seen them live on TV and it had blow me away.
> .m
Cheers.
--
Andrew [at] Rockface
www.rockface-records.co.uk
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9749 ] |
Mo, 04 April 2005 19:09 |
|
Cam wrote:
> Ralf Sandner wrote:
>>
>> RAMONES need to be added to the list
>>
>
> I'm totally retarted for the Ramones but I'll admit Acid Eaters teh
> su><0rd
I like Acid Eaters, but then I really like old garage stuff.
--
Andrew [at] Rockface
www.rockface-records.co.uk
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9752 ] |
Di, 05 April 2005 02:38 |
|
Hundred Reasons
Idlewild
Less than Jake
Disturbed
Really wanna say Stereophonics too but J.E.E.P. really licked sack, new
album is cool though.
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9753 ] |
Di, 05 April 2005 07:52 |
|
Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
> mattie wrote:
>
>>Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
>>
>>>mattie wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>mattie wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>QUOTSA- ...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Kyuss.
>>>>
>>>>Aww. Right. Always forget about that. But at least they started as a
>>>>new band with their new music.
>>>>.m
>>>
>>>
>>>I really like Kyuss. haven't got any QOTSA yet, but that will change
>>>- which album first?
>>>
>>
>>I haven't heard the new one yet, but of the ones which were are out
>>before, definitely "Songs for The Deaf". Actually it was the first
>>time in years that I had bought a record by a contemporary American
>>rock band. I Had seen them live on TV and it had blow me away.
>>.m
>
>
> Cheers.
>
HELLO... the obvious band...AC fucking DC? Still love em though.
Umm...Oasis hasn't broke from a formula. Still like em.
Iron Maiden. Incredibly long songs about mystical shit.
Joan Jett and the Blackhearts. Basically wrote a few of her own songs
for an album and built it around covers - which by and large were
horrible listens. Her Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap is perhaps the worst
cover I've ever heard.
The Polish punk band KSU. Good shit, but damn they be stuck in a time warp.
The Misfits post-1995.
The Adolescents.
D.I.
The Stray Cats.
Seven Year Bitch.
--
Mike
Youngstown, OH
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9757 ] |
Di, 05 April 2005 09:44 |
|
Mike wrote:
> Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
>> mattie wrote:
>>
>>> Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
>>>
>>>> mattie wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> mattie wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> QUOTSA- ...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Kyuss.
>>>>>
>>>>> Aww. Right. Always forget about that. But at least they started
>>>>> as a new band with their new music.
>>>>> .m
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I really like Kyuss. haven't got any QOTSA yet, but that will
>>>> change - which album first?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I haven't heard the new one yet, but of the ones which were are out
>>> before, definitely "Songs for The Deaf". Actually it was the first
>>> time in years that I had bought a record by a contemporary American
>>> rock band. I Had seen them live on TV and it had blow me away.
>>> .m
>>
>>
>> Cheers.
>>
>
> HELLO... the obvious band...AC fucking DC? Still love em though.
A little more bluesy when Bon Scot fronted them, but pretty much unchanged.
> Umm...Oasis hasn't broke from a formula. Still like em.
>
> Iron Maiden. Incredibly long songs about mystical shit.
Again, the first two albums, with Tony Dianno (sp?) were pretty decent,
metal/rock. Then they went all comic-book on us. Number of the beast was
where it all started to go wobbly - not a bad album, but not a patch on the
first two.
> Joan Jett and the Blackhearts. Basically wrote a few of her own songs
> for an album and built it around covers - which by and large were
> horrible listens. Her Dirty Deeds Done Dirt Cheap is perhaps the worst
> cover I've ever heard.
I love rock n roll!
> The Polish punk band KSU. Good shit, but damn they be stuck in a time
> warp.
>
> The Misfits post-1995.
Tried desperatly hard to ignore them.
> The Adolescents.
>
> D.I.
Agreed.
> The Stray Cats.
Yay! I loved the Stray Cats. Even had a Phantom, Rocker and Slick 12".
Great, fun rock n roll.
> Seven Year Bitch.
--
Andrew [at] Rockface
np: (Winamp is not active ;-)
www.rockface-records.co.uk
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9758 ] |
Di, 05 April 2005 12:30 |
|
Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
> Yay! I loved the Stray Cats. Even had a Phantom, Rocker and Slick 12".
> Great, fun rock n roll.
>
>
>>Seven Year Bitch.
>
>
I bought a Stray Cats CD two weeks ago and played it loud during the
whole following week :)
..m
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9762 ] |
Di, 05 April 2005 14:00 |
|
mattie wrote:
> Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
>> Yay! I loved the Stray Cats. Even had a Phantom, Rocker and Slick
>> 12". Great, fun rock n roll.
>>
>>
>>> Seven Year Bitch.
>>
>>
>
> I bought a Stray Cats CD two weeks ago and played it loud during the
> whole following week :)
> .m
dum dum dum dum dum dum dum ba-daa
dum dum dum dum dum dum dum ba-daa
Love those that bass.
--
Andrew [at] Rockface
np: (Winamp is not active ;-)
www.rockface-records.co.uk
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9765 ] |
Di, 05 April 2005 14:50 |
|
"rooner in space" <wowfabgroovy [at] wowmail.com> wrote in message
news:42547382.6806375 [at] news.easynews.com...
> with nothing better to do, i'm trying to make a list of bands who
> recorded at least 2 albums, and didn't significantly change their
> style of music. learning to play is ok, but playing a completely
> different type of music isn't.
>
> they don't need to be punk bands, and just to stay on topic they can
> even be white power bands. but they must have played the same type of
> music for their entire life, and must have recorded at least 2 albums.
>
> the ones i can think of are:
>
> the rezillos (if you ignore the revillos crap)
They only did one proper lp?
the 2nd was live
Add
Joy Divison (maybe?)
Chocolate Watch Band
He Said
The Faces
Inspiral Carpets
The Meteors
New York Dolls
miner.-
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9771 ] |
Di, 05 April 2005 17:40 |
|
Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
> mattie wrote:
>> Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
>>> Yay! I loved the Stray Cats. Even had a Phantom, Rocker and Slick
>>> 12". Great, fun rock n roll.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Seven Year Bitch.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I bought a Stray Cats CD two weeks ago and played it loud during the
>> whole following week :)
>> .m
>
> dum dum dum dum dum dum dum ba-daa
> dum dum dum dum dum dum dum ba-daa
> Love those that bass.
What the fuck is up with my speeling and grammar at the moment! That bastard
Dennis Jaywood has put a hex on me.
--
Andrew [at] Rockface
www.rockface-records.co.uk
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9772 ] |
Di, 05 April 2005 18:26 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9773 ] |
Di, 05 April 2005 18:38 |
|
"e" <noone [at] some.domain> wrote in message
news:e%y4e.3480770$Zm5.558828 [at] news.easynews.com...
>>
> yeah, he said for sure.
Funny how Wire and the spin offs made it bigger un the US in the 80s than
they did over here.
> joy division. but not spew odor.
I like New Order in their own right, but they pale compared to JD.
miner.-
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9783 ] |
Di, 05 April 2005 20:53 |
|
|
i don't recall any bad records by d.i.
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9784 ] |
Di, 05 April 2005 21:11 |
|
miner.- wrote:
> "rooner in space" <wowfabgroovy [at] wowmail.com> wrote in message
> news:42547382.6806375 [at] news.easynews.com...
> > with nothing better to do, i'm trying to make a list of bands who
> > recorded at least 2 albums, and didn't significantly change their
> > style of music. learning to play is ok, but playing a completely
> > different type of music isn't.
> >
> > they don't need to be punk bands, and just to stay on topic they
can
> > even be white power bands. but they must have played the same type
of
> > music for their entire life, and must have recorded at least 2
albums.
> >
> > the ones i can think of are:
> >
> > the rezillos (if you ignore the revillos crap)
>
> They only did one proper lp?
> the 2nd was live
>
> Joy Divison (maybe?)
But the subsequent stuff doesn't even approach the level of the first
side of the first record, which, although it is 5 separate songs,
functions as a unit.
>
> New York Dolls
>
That's for certain.
And heck, add the Sex Pistols, or as my buddy says, "The Dolls' next
two albums if they hadn't broken up."
I didn't feel at all "cheated" by Swindle. I thought it was great.
More than half the songs were good. How much more do you expect?
>
> miner.-
--Bryan
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9787 ] |
Di, 05 April 2005 21:42 |
|
Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
> Andrew [at] Rockface wrote:
>>dum dum dum dum dum dum dum ba-daa
>>dum dum dum dum dum dum dum ba-daa
>>Love those that bass.
>
>
> What the fuck is up with my speeling and grammar at the moment! That bastard
> Dennis Jaywood has put a hex on me.
>
Hehe. Yes, Jaywood really is the brainwashing kind with his hateful naivity.
..m
P.S. I had written "brainwashing king" in the first instance :)
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9791 ] |
Mi, 06 April 2005 12:32 |
|
"Pan paniscus" <CLASSACT [at] BRICK.NET> wrote in message
news:1112728260.853723.85460 [at] o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Joy Divison (maybe?)
>
> But the subsequent stuff doesn't even approach the level of the first
> side of the first record, which, although it is 5 separate songs,
> functions as a unit.
>
I rate UP as the second best LP ever, I like it all
Closer I'm not over keen on the first 4 tracks but rate the rest of it.
My mates went to see them at the last ever show in 1980 at Brum uni, I was
only 13 so wouldn't have got
in as it was over 18s, they were 15 and could pass for 18.
>> New York Dolls
>>
> That's for certain.
> And heck, add the Sex Pistols, or as my buddy says, "The Dolls' next
> two albums if they hadn't broken up."
> I didn't feel at all "cheated" by Swindle. I thought it was great.
> More than half the songs were good. How much more do you expect?
>>
Yes I like the Swindle as well, the Black Arabs track is sweet!!!
Even the singa-longa Sid stuff is passable
miner.-
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9809 ] |
Do, 07 April 2005 02:22 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9810 ] |
Do, 07 April 2005 02:20 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9811 ] |
Do, 07 April 2005 02:22 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9812 ] |
Do, 07 April 2005 02:20 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9813 ] |
Do, 07 April 2005 02:20 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9814 ] |
Do, 07 April 2005 03:13 |
|
>i never heard nowt by the others except for personality crisis, but i
>know the dickies went soft.
People who write such crap are not fit to even just think about their
betters. Hitler was far superior to you.
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9815 ] |
Do, 07 April 2005 03:15 |
|
"Dennis Jaywood" <Super DJwood> wrote in message
news:0829515gbavru0ro40b22e3ftb9hj38btp [at] 4ax.com...
>
>>i never heard nowt by the others except for personality crisis, but i
>>know the dickies went soft.
>
> People who write such crap are not fit to even just think about their
> betters. Hitler was far superior to you.
>
Note that you don't keep on the subject of bands that didn't go crap ..
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9816 ] |
Do, 07 April 2005 03:31 |
|
It is enough on bands.
On Thu, 07 Apr 2005 01:15:05 GMT, "NY Dark Blue"
<dundeefc [at] frontierspam.com> wrote:
>
>"Dennis Jaywood" <Super DJwood> wrote in message
>news:0829515gbavru0ro40b22e3ftb9hj38btp [at] 4ax.com...
>>
>>>i never heard nowt by the others except for personality crisis, but i
>>>know the dickies went soft.
>>
>> People who write such crap are not fit to even just think about their
>> betters. Hitler was far superior to you.
>>
>Note that you don't keep on the subject of bands that didn't go crap ..
>
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9817 ] |
Do, 07 April 2005 03:57 |
|
"Dennis Jaywood" <Super DJwood> wrote in message
news:ga3951d179oue06bc5rpjqrlt36e749f9b [at] 4ax.com...
> It is enough on bands.
>
Then why did you post on the thread when it's titled
"Bands who didn't go crap" ?
BTW you've never actually mentioned a single skinhead band .
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9820 ] |
Do, 07 April 2005 11:39 |
|
"NY Dark Blue" <dundeefc [at] frontierspam.com> wrote in message
news:hs05e.3016$hg.2898 [at] news01.roc.ny...
>
> "Dennis Jaywood" <Super DJwood> wrote in message
> news:ga3951d179oue06bc5rpjqrlt36e749f9b [at] 4ax.com...
>> It is enough on bands.
>>
>
> Then why did you post on the thread when it's titled
> "Bands who didn't go crap" ?
>
> BTW you've never actually mentioned a single skinhead band .
Yes and Dennis and his bum pals sucking each other off whilst twanging away
on the banjo don't count either
miner.-
|
|
|
| Re: bands who didn't go crap [message #9821 ] |
Do, 07 April 2005 12:33 |
|
"rooner in space" <wowfabgroovy [at] wowmail.com> wrote in message
news:42637b00.5867437 [at] news.easynews.com...
> "miner.-" <outdoorminer_uk [at] yahoo.co.uk> went:
>
>>> the rezillos (if you ignore the revillos crap)
>>
>>They only did one proper lp?
>>the 2nd was live
>
> yeah but they did enough singles to make half another. and there was
> another lp (actually a cd) a few years ago. also live, but it was
> still similar enough to the original band.
>
>
I only know of the two lp's
Can Stand The....
& Mission Accomplished
miner.-
|
|
|
