| New star trek [message #102804] |
Sa, 06 August 2005 17:46 |
|
will there be any more new star trek t.v showes, or movies, or is the end of
STAR TREK??????
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #102812 ] |
Sa, 06 August 2005 22:30 |
|
"mrchristian" <mrchristian [at] cableone.net> wrote in message
news:11f9mrjb7hi70eb [at] corp.supernews.com...
> will there be any more new star trek t.v showes, or movies, or is the end
of
> STAR TREK??????
http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/
--
Qa'pla
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #102813 ] |
Sa, 06 August 2005 23:38 |
|
LMAO!!!!
"Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:m59Je.128885$%K2.49756 [at] pd7tw1no...
> "mrchristian" <mrchristian [at] cableone.net> wrote in message
> news:11f9mrjb7hi70eb [at] corp.supernews.com...
>> will there be any more new star trek t.v showes, or movies, or is the end
> of
>> STAR TREK??????
>
> http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/
>
> --
>
> Qa'pla
> Kweeg
> Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
>
>
>
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #102815 ] |
Sa, 06 August 2005 23:46 |
|
"mrchristian" <mrchristian [at] cableone.net> wrote in message
news:11f9mrjb7hi70eb [at] corp.supernews.com...
> will there be any more new star trek t.v showes, or movies, or is the end
> of STAR TREK??????
>
I just hope B&B don't have any part of future shows.
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #102817 ] |
So, 07 August 2005 00:07 |
|
"John Doe" <firsTraveler [at] centurytel.net> wrote in message
news:ncednbfowOA0smjfRVn-2A [at] centurytel.net...
>
> "mrchristian" <mrchristian [at] cableone.net> wrote in message
> news:11f9mrjb7hi70eb [at] corp.supernews.com...
>> will there be any more new star trek t.v showes, or movies, or is the end
>> of STAR TREK??????
>>
>
> I just hope B&B don't have any part of future shows.
I don't know. Someone still has to clean the actor's dressing room toilets
between shots.
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #102819 ] |
So, 07 August 2005 04:12 |
|
Snake wrote:
> "John Doe" <firsTraveler [at] centurytel.net> wrote
>>I just hope B&B don't have any part of future shows.
>
>
> I don't know. Someone still has to clean the actor's dressing room toilets
> between shots.
>
>
LOL!
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #102846 ] |
Sa, 06 August 2005 22:44 |
|
"mrchristian" <mrchristian [at] cableone.net> wrote in message
news:11f9mrjb7hi70eb [at] corp.supernews.com...
> will there be any more new star trek t.v showes, or movies, or is the end
of
> STAR TREK??????
I hope it has a rest for a while before coming back. Just so long as it is
not left too long like the last time.
John H
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/1701-tenforward
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #102847 ] |
So, 07 August 2005 17:37 |
|
There've been rumors of a movie, but they're from the Internet, which should
tell you how seriously you should take them. Plus the fact that Paramount
would have to release the movie (which I think Paramount has no interest in
anything Trek for the forseeable future), don't count on anything soon. Or
at least under the leadership of Berman and Co.
"mrchristian" <mrchristian [at] cableone.net> wrote in message
news:11f9mrjb7hi70eb [at] corp.supernews.com...
> will there be any more new star trek t.v showes, or movies, or is the end
of
> STAR TREK??????
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #102863 ] |
Mo, 08 August 2005 12:13 |
|
In article <11f9mrjb7hi70eb [at] corp.supernews.com>, mrchristian
<mrchristian [at] cableone.net> writes
>will there be any more new star trek t.v showes, or movies, or is the end of
>STAR TREK??????
Take a look at "Http://www.newvoyages.com/" - Continuing year 4 for the
5 year mission.
I liked it. Live action, not cartoons. "Modern" special effects.
Faithfully reproduced sets, uniforms and hair styles.
Try Trailer 2: "Doomsday" from this link:
"http://www.5yearmission.com/FILES/files.htm"
--
Steve Charlton | You may have trouble getting
steve [at] gnirekoms.freeserve.co.uk | permission to aerobrake or
hint: ^^^^^^^^^ | lithobrake asteroids on Earth!
reverse this | - James D Nicoll
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #102864 ] |
Mo, 08 August 2005 12:14 |
|
In article <m59Je.128885$%K2.49756 [at] pd7tw1no>, Kweeg
<kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> writes
>http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/
ROFLMAO! Oh that's so funny! Hats off to whoever thought that up.
--
Steve Charlton | You may have trouble getting
steve [at] gnirekoms.freeserve.co.uk | permission to aerobrake or
hint: ^^^^^^^^^ | lithobrake asteroids on Earth!
reverse this | - James D Nicoll
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #102871 ] |
Di, 09 August 2005 03:19 |
|
"Steve Charlton" <steve [at] nospam.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:mWQt8I6iBz9CFwPN [at] smokering.freeserve.co.uk...
> In article <11f9mrjb7hi70eb [at] corp.supernews.com>, mrchristian
> <mrchristian [at] cableone.net> writes
>>will there be any more new star trek t.v showes, or movies, or is the end
>>of
>>STAR TREK??????
>
> Take a look at "Http://www.newvoyages.com/" - Continuing year 4 for the 5
> year mission.
>
> I liked it. Live action, not cartoons. "Modern" special effects.
> Faithfully reproduced sets, uniforms and hair styles.
>
> Try Trailer 2: "Doomsday" from this link:
> "http://www.5yearmission.com/FILES/files.htm"
Actually, don't watch Trailer 2. The episode is a LOT better than the
trailer and it only serves to add a bit of spoiler to the mix.
Just watch the episode, you'll see :)
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #102872 ] |
Di, 09 August 2005 03:21 |
|
"Steve Charlton" <steve [at] nospam.freeserve.co.uk> wrote in message
news:mWQt8I6iBz9CFwPN [at] smokering.freeserve.co.uk...
> Take a look at "Http://www.newvoyages.com/" - Continuing year 4 for the 5
> year mission.
>
> I liked it. Live action, not cartoons. "Modern" special effects.
> Faithfully reproduced sets, uniforms and hair styles.
>
> Try Trailer 2: "Doomsday" from this link:
> "http://www.5yearmission.com/FILES/files.htm"
You should take a look at Exeter's ep. 2 teaser. Like, wow?!
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #102878 ] |
Di, 09 August 2005 19:24 |
|
"mrchristian" <mrchristian [at] cableone.net> wrote in message
news:11f9mrjb7hi70eb [at] corp.supernews.com...
> will there be any more new star trek t.v showes, or movies, or is the end
> of STAR TREK??????
¶ Not with the right wing christian radicals in power. They hate science and
science fiction.§
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #102879 ] |
Di, 09 August 2005 19:24 |
|
"Nog" <nognog [at] adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:AsudnWwGyoaZd2XfRVn-hw [at] adelphia.com...
>
> "mrchristian" <mrchristian [at] cableone.net> wrote in message
> news:11f9mrjb7hi70eb [at] corp.supernews.com...
> > will there be any more new star trek t.v showes, or movies, or is the
end
> > of STAR TREK??????
> ¶ Not with the right wing christian radicals in power. They hate science
and
> science fiction.§
How do you figure? Are you really a moron or do you just play one on the
newsgroups?
--
Qa'pla
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #106761 ] |
Di, 09 August 2005 20:48 |
|
"Nog" <nognog [at] adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:AsudnWwGyoaZd2XfRVn-hw [at] adelphia.com...
>
> "mrchristian" <mrchristian [at] cableone.net> wrote in message
> news:11f9mrjb7hi70eb [at] corp.supernews.com...
>> will there be any more new star trek t.v showes, or movies, or is the end
>> of STAR TREK??????
> ¶ Not with the right wing christian radicals in power. They hate science
> and science fiction.§
Pwned :D
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #106765 ] |
Di, 09 August 2005 23:24 |
|
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:38:18 -0400, "Nog" <nognog [at] adelphia.net> wrote:
>¶ Not with the right wing christian radicals in power. They hate science and
>science fiction.§
Bullshirt. They hate what they perceive to be its misuse, but that's not
the same issue.
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #106766 ] |
Mi, 10 August 2005 03:48 |
|
"George Peatty" <pttyg47-1230 [at] copper.net> wrote in message
news:ik7if1tngiamummkgqkaeavql80i04lfud [at] 4ax.com...
> On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:38:18 -0400, "Nog" <nognog [at] adelphia.net> wrote:
>
>>¶ Not with the right wing christian radicals in power. They hate science
>>and
>>science fiction.§
>
> Bullshirt. They hate what they perceive to be its misuse, but that's not
> the same issue.
And they classify "misuse" based upon beliefs, not science.
Still a personal hatred.
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #106779 ] |
Mi, 10 August 2005 20:17 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #106780 ] |
Mi, 10 August 2005 21:35 |
|
"George Peatty" <pttyg47-1230 [at] copper.net> wrote in message
news:dddgbc01li3 [at] drn.newsguy.com...
> In article <K1dKe.3211$lT.259 [at] trndny05>, Snake says...
> Still trying to speak for whole groups of people you neither understand
> nor
> represent, are you, Snake? You're as wrong now as you were earlier. Your
> claim
> itself is about fundamentalist beliefs is suspect on the same grounds,
> inasmuch
> as it is based on belief, and not science.
From one perspective, your claim does have a ring of truth. However from
another perspective, one not as blind nor as self-righteous as your
fundamentalist one, I do indeed have proof:
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/07/29/frist.stem.cells.ap/
Even the Republican House leader, Frist, said quote ""It isn't just a matter
of faith, it's a matter of science" in his address to the House. As a
trained doctor he had previously voted against the issue of stem cell
research based upon his /faith's/ party line - and has now changed his
stance when looking at things from a scientist / doctor's point of view.
Here is one of the most influential religious politicians blatantly claiming
openly his previous anti-research stance was based strictly on his religious
views - a stance he is now changing. And taking heat from his own party for
breaking political fundamentalist lines.
So where's your proof of statement, hmm?
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #106781 ] |
Mi, 10 August 2005 22:57 |
|
BE NICE!!!!
"Snake" <fluidstates_NO+SPAM [at] REMOVE-ME.verizon.IHATESPAM.SPAM_VAC.com> wrote
in message news:pGsKe.2625$Yf7.1306 [at] trndny06...
> "George Peatty" <pttyg47-1230 [at] copper.net> wrote in message
> news:dddgbc01li3 [at] drn.newsguy.com...
>> In article <K1dKe.3211$lT.259 [at] trndny05>, Snake says...
>> Still trying to speak for whole groups of people you neither understand
>> nor
>> represent, are you, Snake? You're as wrong now as you were earlier.
>> Your claim
>> itself is about fundamentalist beliefs is suspect on the same grounds,
>> inasmuch
>> as it is based on belief, and not science.
>
> From one perspective, your claim does have a ring of truth. However from
> another perspective, one not as blind nor as self-righteous as your
> fundamentalist one, I do indeed have proof:
>
> http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/07/29/frist.stem.cells.ap/
>
> Even the Republican House leader, Frist, said quote ""It isn't just a
> matter of faith, it's a matter of science" in his address to the House.
> As a trained doctor he had previously voted against the issue of stem cell
> research based upon his /faith's/ party line - and has now changed his
> stance when looking at things from a scientist / doctor's point of view.
>
> Here is one of the most influential religious politicians blatantly
> claiming openly his previous anti-research stance was based strictly on
> his religious views - a stance he is now changing. And taking heat from
> his own party for breaking political fundamentalist lines.
>
> So where's your proof of statement, hmm?
>
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #111378 ] |
Do, 18 August 2005 10:04 |
|
On
>There've been rumors of a movie, but they're from the Internet, which should
>tell you how seriously you should take them. Plus the fact that Paramount
>would have to release the movie (which I think Paramount has no interest in
>anything Trek for the forseeable future), don't count on anything soon. Or
>at least under the leadership of Berman and Co.
>"mrchristian" <mrchristian [at] cableone.net> wrote in message
>news:11f9mrjb7hi70eb [at] corp.supernews.com...
>> will there be any more new star trek t.v showes, or movies, or is the end
>of
>> STAR TREK??????
>>
>>
>
>
I believe future Star Trek movies are very likely. Another television series,
however...I have no idea.
http://www.trekweb.com/articles/2004/04/22/4087eed3394be.sht ml
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #127950 ] |
Do, 08 September 2005 06:52 |
|
Geez... Some of you people can be so rude and disrespectful. I would answer
by saying I think Star Trek is dead ... the end, as far TV shows and movies.
"Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:m59Je.128885$%K2.49756 [at] pd7tw1no...
> "mrchristian" <mrchristian [at] cableone.net> wrote in message
> news:11f9mrjb7hi70eb [at] corp.supernews.com...
>> will there be any more new star trek t.v showes, or movies, or is the end
> of
>> STAR TREK??????
>
> http://www.justfuckinggoogleit.com/
>
> --
>
> Qa'pla
> Kweeg
> Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
>
>
>
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: New star trek [message #127966 ] |
Do, 08 September 2005 09:22 |
|
"Rick" <RickbytheBrook [at] verizon.net> wrote in message
news:%rPTe.256$EX1.121 [at] trndny06...
> Geez... Some of you people can be so rude and disrespectful. I would
answer
> by saying I think Star Trek is dead ... the end, as far TV shows and
movies.
and top post too!
--
Qa'pla
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty
|
|
|
