|
Sprinkler Systems
Uhaul move
Lawn care
Roses and trees
Ford Parts
Chrysler Parts
Lake Powell
New IPod Touch Apps
New IPhone Apps
IPhone Apps
IPad Information
IPad Apps
Android APPS
Android Games APPS
Android Systems
Android Tablets APPS and Beyond
Smartphone Apps
Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools
Tablet PC
Car Sharing Car Leasing
Tabler Pc
Fly Fishing
Toyota Cars
Vacation Rentals
Stock market
NYSE
SSE Stock
Freight & Shipping News
Gluten
Lactose
Gout
My Coupon Life
Campgrounds Check
Outdoor
Kitchen Design and Redoo
Bath Remodeling
Palm Springs
Las Vegas Vacation Tipps
Lake Powell Boating
Homes for lease
Electric and green Car Blog
Pearls and diamonds
Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App
Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
|
Science Fiction » alt.startrek » THE SCI-FI CHANNEL
| THE SCI-FI CHANNEL [message #50919] |
Di, 31 Mai 2005 17:23 |
|
Why don't they run all those old black and white "b" movies a few times
a week that ran in the 1960's. Ya know,
on Chiller Theater or Supernatural Theater on Saturday nights. Or good
Sci-Fi shows, when they were good.
Seems like the SCI-FI channel should run those movies and old shows
instead of running
all this crap they do most of the time. Most of it sucks anyway. Ya
know, lets go the the center of the earth
to jump start the magma flow again. How many of those are there?? Or
gee wizzz, look at how big that snake is.
Or Jason, can you rip Fredies head off. JEZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
With such great Sci-Fi out there why do they insist on not running any
of it???
A great channel for Sci-Fi but they don't run anything good on it.
Which makes the Sci-Fi channel NOT GOOD for Sci-fi,
and that is a shame.
|
|
|
| Re: THE SCI-FI CHANNEL [message #50947 ] |
Di, 31 Mai 2005 23:33 |
|
Gen. Geroge Hammond wrote:
> With such great Sci-Fi out there why do they insist on not running any
> of it???
It costs them money to run movies that they didn't produce themselves...
|
|
|
| Re: THE SCI-FI CHANNEL [message #50969 ] |
Mi, 01 Juni 2005 02:22 |
|
Ah, this is true BUT the stuff I'm talking about can be
gotten for a song. MUCH less then producing "their" own crap.
Now there is another "perfect storm" movie.
Jeeeeeezzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Ryan P. wrote:
> Gen. Geroge Hammond wrote:
>
>> With such great Sci-Fi out there why do they insist on not running
>> any of it???
>
>
> It costs them money to run movies that they didn't produce themselves...
|
|
|
| Re: THE SCI-FI CHANNEL [message #50970 ] |
Mi, 01 Juni 2005 02:54 |
|
"Gen. Geroge Hammond" <TOKRA [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
news:aj%me.1729$_Q2.1513 [at] fe11.lga...
> Why don't they run all those old black and white "b" movies a few times
> a week that ran in the 1960's. Ya know,
> on Chiller Theater or Supernatural Theater on Saturday nights. Or good
> Sci-Fi shows, when they were good.
> Seems like the SCI-FI channel should run those movies and old shows
> instead of running
> all this crap they do most of the time. Most of it sucks anyway. Ya
> know, lets go the the center of the earth
> to jump start the magma flow again. How many of those are there?? Or
> gee wizzz, look at how big that snake is.
> Or Jason, can you rip Fredies head off. JEZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
> With such great Sci-Fi out there why do they insist on not running any
> of it???
> A great channel for Sci-Fi but they don't run anything good on it.
> Which makes the Sci-Fi channel NOT GOOD for Sci-fi,
> and that is a shame.
WORD FOR WORD what we said the other Saturday night. These in house
movies gotta cost them 100 times what it would cost for those great 50's b&w
classics that we never get tired of. I can watch The Tingler, It Came From
My Underwear, the Giant Fruit Bat and they others forever. These Saturday
night flicks are worse than awful! Bad acting, stories, and directing. What
are they thinking? They must be spending a bundle on production costs and
special effects for basically a one shot showing. I wonder if they think
that they have a DVD or or some other after market for all this shlock?
--
JK Sinrod
Sinrod Stained Glass Studios
www.sinrodstudios.com
Coney Island Memories
www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories
|
|
|
| Re: THE SCI-FI CHANNEL [message #50999 ] |
Mi, 01 Juni 2005 05:09 |
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------040206020308050203020408
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
They should send these new Sci-Fi movies to all
the jails around the country and make the inmates watch them.
They will never want to go back to the slammer!!!!!
======================
WORD FOR WORD what we said the other Saturday night. These in house
movies gotta cost them 100 times what it would cost for those great 50's b&w
classics that we never get tired of. I can watch The Tingler, It Came From
My Underwear, the Giant Fruit Bat and they others forever. These Saturday
night flicks are worse than awful! Bad acting, stories, and directing. What
are they thinking? They must be spending a bundle on production costs and
special effects for basically a one shot showing. I wonder if they think
that they have a DVD or or some other after market for all this shlock?
Glassman wrote:
>"Gen. Geroge Hammond" <TOKRA [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:aj%me.1729$_Q2.1513 [at] fe11.lga...
>
>
>>Why don't they run all those old black and white "b" movies a few times
>>a week that ran in the 1960's. Ya know,
>>on Chiller Theater or Supernatural Theater on Saturday nights. Or good
>>Sci-Fi shows, when they were good.
>>Seems like the SCI-FI channel should run those movies and old shows
>>instead of running
>>all this crap they do most of the time. Most of it sucks anyway. Ya
>>know, lets go the the center of the earth
>>to jump start the magma flow again. How many of those are there?? Or
>>gee wizzz, look at how big that snake is.
>>Or Jason, can you rip Fredies head off. JEZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
>>With such great Sci-Fi out there why do they insist on not running any
>>of it???
>>A great channel for Sci-Fi but they don't run anything good on it.
>>Which makes the Sci-Fi channel NOT GOOD for Sci-fi,
>>and that is a shame.
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
--------------040206020308050203020408
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<pre wrap="">They should send these new Sci-Fi movies to all
the jails around the country and make the inmates watch them.
They will never want to go back to the slammer!!!!!
======================
WORD FOR WORD what we said the other Saturday night. These in house
movies gotta cost them 100 times what it would cost for those great 50's b&w
classics that we never get tired of. I can watch The Tingler, It Came From
My Underwear, the Giant Fruit Bat and they others forever. These Saturday
night flicks are worse than awful! Bad acting, stories, and directing. What
are they thinking? They must be spending a bundle on production costs and
special effects for basically a one shot showing. I wonder if they think
that they have a DVD or or some other after market for all this shlock?</pre>
<br>
<br>
Glassman wrote:<br>
<blockquote cite="midHG7ne.27821$NZ1.5207 [at] fe09.lga" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">"Gen. Geroge Hammond" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:TOKRA [at] optonline.net"><TOKRA [at] optonline.net></a> wrote in message
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:aj%me.1729$_Q2.1513 [at] fe11.lga">news:aj%me.1729$_Q2.1513 [at] fe11.lga</a>...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Why don't they run all those old black and white "b" movies a few times
a week that ran in the 1960's. Ya know,
on Chiller Theater or Supernatural Theater on Saturday nights. Or good
Sci-Fi shows, when they were good.
Seems like the SCI-FI channel should run those movies and old shows
instead of running
all this crap they do most of the time. Most of it sucks anyway. Ya
know, lets go the the center of the earth
to jump start the magma flow again. How many of those are there?? Or
gee wizzz, look at how big that snake is.
Or Jason, can you rip Fredies head off. JEZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
With such great Sci-Fi out there why do they insist on not running any
of it???
A great channel for Sci-Fi but they don't run anything good on it.
Which makes the Sci-Fi channel NOT GOOD for Sci-fi,
and that is a shame.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------040206020308050203020408--
|
|
|
| Re: THE SCI-FI CHANNEL [message #51000 ] |
Mi, 01 Juni 2005 05:26 |
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------010104060807030909050006
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
tiny minority??? NAh, doubt it. There are TONS of baby boomers that
would agree with me.
Most, not all though. Like you said, "to each his own".
Just because a show or a movie is in glorious color that does not make
it good.
The same thing goes for special effects. Many movies in the last 20
years or so
have great special effects!! But the movie still sucks!! Color and
effects do not make up for
GOOD writing. Here is an example: Ever see the original Time Machine
with Rod Taylor??
Ever see the "new" Time Machine movie a year or so ago. One should be
burned in the trash while the other is timeless!!
If you never saw the one with Rod Taylor, go see it, this is the
timeless one (no pun intended).
Many of the older Sci-Fi movies as well as regular movies are BETTER
than some of today's
crap on TV. Sometimes Black and White enhances the story.
I'm not saying color is bad or anything like that, heck, I love color
but just because something is Black and White
doesn't make it bad.
just my .04 cents, inflation you know.....
------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ ----------
------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------
SAC 441 wrote:
To each his own I guess.....but why would anyone want to watch black and
white? Blahh....I cheered when they came out with the first color sets
back in the early 60's......now you want a national programmer to
redistribute this drack? (Euphemism for something else.)
Besides,there is a channel called B-MANIA that shows stuff like this
for the tiny minority that likes this kind of programming.
============================================================ ======================
JK Sinrod wrote:
WORD FOR WORD what we said the other Saturday night. These in house
movies gotta cost them 100 times what it would cost for those great 50's b&w
classics that we never get tired of. I can watch The Tingler, It Came From
My Underwear, the Giant Fruit Bat and they others forever. These Saturday
night flicks are worse than awful! Bad acting, stories, and directing. What
are they thinking? They must be spending a bundle on production costs and
special effects for basically a one shot showing. I wonder if they think
that they have a DVD or or some other after market for all this shlock?
-- JK Sinrod Sinrod Stained Glass Studios www.sinrodstudios.com Coney
Island Memories www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories
--------------010104060807030909050006
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
tiny minority??? NAh, doubt it. There are TONS of baby boomers that
would agree with me.<br>
Most, not all though. Like you said, "to each his own".<br>
Just because a show or a movie is in glorious color that does not make
it good.<br>
The same thing goes for special effects. Many movies in the last 20
years or so<br>
have great special effects!! But the movie still sucks!! Color and
effects do <b>not</b> make up for <br>
GOOD writing. Here is an example: Ever see the original Time Machine
with Rod Taylor??<br>
Ever see the "new" Time Machine movie a year or so ago. One should be
burned in the trash while the other is timeless!!<br>
If you never saw the one with Rod Taylor, go see it, this is the
timeless one (no pun intended). <br>
Many of the older Sci-Fi movies as well as regular movies are BETTER
than some of today's <br>
crap on TV. Sometimes Black and White enhances the story. <br>
I'm not saying color is bad or anything like that, heck, I love color
but just because something is Black and White<br>
doesn't make it bad.<br>
<br>
just my .04 cents, inflation you know.....<br>
------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- <br>
------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------ ------------ <br>
<br>
<br>
SAC 441 wrote:<br>
<pre wrap="">To each his own I guess.....but why would anyone want to watch black and
white? Blahh....I cheered when they came out with the first color sets
back in the early 60's......now you want a national programmer to
redistribute this drack? (Euphemism for something else.)
Besides,there is a channel called B-MANIA that shows stuff like this
for the tiny minority that likes this kind of programming.
</pre>
============================================================ ====================== <br>
<pre wrap="">JK Sinrod wrote:</pre>
<pre wrap=""> WORD FOR WORD what we said the other Saturday night. These in house
movies gotta cost them 100 times what it would cost for those great 50's b&w
classics that we never get tired of. I can watch The Tingler, It Came From
My Underwear, the Giant Fruit Bat and they others forever. These Saturday
night flicks are worse than awful! Bad acting, stories, and directing. What
are they thinking? They must be spending a bundle on production costs and
special effects for basically a one shot showing. I wonder if they think
that they have a DVD or or some other after market for all this shlock?
<div class="moz-txt-sig">--
JK Sinrod
Sinrod Stained Glass Studios
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.sinrodstudios.com">www.sinrodstudios.com</a>
Coney Island Memories
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated"
href="http://www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories">www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories</a>
</div></pre>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------010104060807030909050006--
|
|
|
| Re: THE SCI-FI CHANNEL [message #51003 ] |
Mi, 01 Juni 2005 05:33 |
|
"Gen. Geroge Hammond" <TOKRA [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
news:429D2AF4.8090600 [at] optonline.net...
> tiny minority??? NAh, doubt it. There are TONS of baby boomers that
> would agree with me.
> Most, not all though. Like you said, "to each his own".
> Just because a show or a movie is in glorious color that does not make
> it good.
> The same thing goes for special effects. Many movies in the last 20
> years or so
> have great special effects!! But the movie still sucks!! Color and
> effects do not make up for
> GOOD writing. Here is an example: Ever see the original Time Machine
> with Rod Taylor??
> Ever see the "new" Time Machine movie a year or so ago. One should be
> burned in the trash while the other is timeless!!
> If you never saw the one with Rod Taylor, go see it, this is the
> timeless one (no pun intended).
I agree fully. I did not see the remake, and frankly was not and continue
not to be interested. I knew they pretty much could not top the original
and I heard, from the reviews, that they didn't. The original, somewhat a
"cult" sci-fi film I think I can safely say, is simply fantastic. I am so
glad you brought this one up - it is one of my absolute favorites. The
ending is a (mental) show-stopper.
|
|
|
| Re: THE SCI-FI CHANNEL [message #51008 ] |
Mi, 01 Juni 2005 05:51 |
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------080307000803070603020007
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
The Time Machine is one of my favorite movies also.
If you have it on DVD (you should) there is some good extra stuff
after the movie. They have Rod Taylor and Alan Young (Filby) ia a 10 or 15 minute
"little play" where Filby is standing in the lab and George comes back for him and
wants to take him into the future before he dies in the war. And yes, the Time machine is there!!!
Wonderful!!! GET IT!!!!!
Snake wrote:
I agree fully. I did not see the remake, and frankly was not and continue
not to be interested. I knew they pretty much could not top the original
and I heard, from the reviews, that they didn't. The original, somewhat a
"cult" sci-fi film I think I can safely say, is simply fantastic. I am so
glad you brought this one up - it is one of my absolute favorites. The
ending is a (mental) show-stopper.
>"Gen. Geroge Hammond" <TOKRA [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
>news:429D2AF4.8090600 [at] optonline.net...
>
>
>>tiny minority??? NAh, doubt it. There are TONS of baby boomers that
>>would agree with me.
>>Most, not all though. Like you said, "to each his own".
>>Just because a show or a movie is in glorious color that does not make
>>it good.
>>The same thing goes for special effects. Many movies in the last 20
>>years or so
>>have great special effects!! But the movie still sucks!! Color and
>>effects do not make up for
>>GOOD writing. Here is an example: Ever see the original Time Machine
>>with Rod Taylor??
>>Ever see the "new" Time Machine movie a year or so ago. One should be
>>burned in the trash while the other is timeless!!
>>If you never saw the one with Rod Taylor, go see it, this is the
>>timeless one (no pun intended).
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
--------------080307000803070603020007
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<pre wrap="">The Time Machine is one of my favorite movies also.
If you have it on DVD (you should) there is some good extra stuff
after the movie. They have Rod Taylor and Alan Young (Filby) ia a 10 or 15 minute
"little play" where Filby is standing in the lab and George comes back for him and
wants to take him into the future before he dies in the war. And yes, the Time machine is there!!!
Wonderful!!! GET IT!!!!!
Snake wrote:
I agree fully. I did not see the remake, and frankly was not and continue
not to be interested. I knew they pretty much could not top the original
and I heard, from the reviews, that they didn't. The original, somewhat a
"cult" sci-fi film I think I can safely say, is simply fantastic. I am so
glad you brought this one up - it is one of my absolute favorites. The
ending is a (mental) show-stopper. </pre>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mida0ane.10781$zb.6400 [at] trndny01" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">"Gen. Geroge Hammond" <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:TOKRA [at] optonline.net"><TOKRA [at] optonline.net></a> wrote in message
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="news:429D2AF4.8090600 [at] optonline.net">news:429D2AF4.8090600 [at] optonline.net</a>...
</pre>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre wrap="">tiny minority??? NAh, doubt it. There are TONS of baby boomers that
would agree with me.
Most, not all though. Like you said, "to each his own".
Just because a show or a movie is in glorious color that does not make
it good.
The same thing goes for special effects. Many movies in the last 20
years or so
have great special effects!! But the movie still sucks!! Color and
effects do not make up for
GOOD writing. Here is an example: Ever see the original Time Machine
with Rod Taylor??
Ever see the "new" Time Machine movie a year or so ago. One should be
burned in the trash while the other is timeless!!
If you never saw the one with Rod Taylor, go see it, this is the
timeless one (no pun intended).
</pre>
</blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>
--------------080307000803070603020007--
|
|
|
| Re: THE SCI-FI CHANNEL [message #51045 ] |
Mi, 01 Juni 2005 16:45 |
|
"Gen. Geroge Hammond" <TOKRA [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
news:429D30B5.10601 [at] optonline.net...
> The Time Machine is one of my favorite movies also.
> If you have it on DVD (you should) there is some good extra stuff
> after the movie. They have Rod Taylor and Alan Young (Filby) ia a 10 or
15 minute
> "little play" where Filby is standing in the lab and George comes back
for him and
> wants to take him into the future before he dies in the war. And yes, the
Time machine is there!!!
> Wonderful!!! GET IT!!!!!
Thanks. :-) I will try to get it now. I was trying to get it in laserdisc
format - a bit more "collectable" - but those DVD extras certainly sound
worth it.
|
|
|
| Re: THE SCI-FI CHANNEL [message #51117 ] |
Do, 02 Juni 2005 04:51 |
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C566FC.70B79B80
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
"Gen. Geroge Hammond" <TOKRA [at] optonline.net> wrote in message =
news:429D2AF4.8090600 [at] optonline.net...
tiny minority??? NAh, doubt it. There are TONS of baby boomers that =
would agree with me.
Most, not all though. Like you said, "to each his own".
Just because a show or a movie is in glorious color that does not make =
it good.
The same thing goes for special effects. Many movies in the last 20 =
years or so
have great special effects!! But the movie still sucks!! Color and =
effects do not make up for=20
GOOD writing. Here is an example: Ever see the original Time Machine =
with Rod Taylor??
Ever see the "new" Time Machine movie a year or so ago. One should be =
burned in the trash while the other is timeless!!
If you never saw the one with Rod Taylor, go see it, this is the =
timeless one (no pun=20
=20
To go you one further, it's the movies themselves, not necessarily =
whether they are in b&w or color. I guess a younger generation is =
immediately turned off to b&w, while purists get their panties in a =
bunch when they want to colorize them.=20
Time Machine: What books would you take back with you, was not the =
great movie as much as the great writing done at the turn of the =
century. A great pleasure is seeing the gleam in my young sons eyes when =
that line was spoken. It made for hours of discussion for years to come. =
As to the poster that won't see the remake. Shame on you. You should =
give every new thing at least a try. What about the War of The Worlds =
remake?The original was one of the best ever.=20
--=20
JK Sinrod
Sinrod Stained Glass Studios
www.sinrodstudios.com
Coney Island Memories
www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories
------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C566FC.70B79B80
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD><TITLE></TITLE>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type =
content=3Dtext/html;charset=3DISO-8859-1>
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2800.1106" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY text=3D#000000 bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<BLOCKQUOTE=20
style=3D"PADDING-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; =
BORDER-LEFT: #000000 2px solid; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px">
<DIV>"Gen. Geroge Hammond" <<A=20
href=3D"mailto:TOKRA [at] optonline.net">TOKRA [at] optonline.net</A>> wrote =
in message=20
<A=20
=
href=3D"news:429D2AF4.8090600 [at] optonline.net">news:429D2AF4.8090600 [at] optonl=
ine.net</A>...</DIV>
<DIV>tiny minority??? NAh, doubt it. There are TONS of =
baby=20
boomers that would agree with me.<BR>Most, not all though. Like you =
said, "to=20
each his own".<BR>Just because a show or a movie is in glorious color =
that=20
does not make it good.<BR>The same thing goes for special =
effects. Many=20
movies in the last 20 years or so<BR>have great special =
effects!! But=20
the movie still sucks!! Color and effects do <B>not</B> make up =
for=20
<BR>GOOD writing. Here is an example: Ever see the =
original Time=20
Machine with Rod Taylor??<BR>Ever see the "new" Time Machine movie a =
year or=20
so ago. One should be burned in the trash while the other is=20
timeless!!<BR>If you never saw the one with Rod Taylor, go see it, =
this is the=20
timeless one (no pun </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> To go you one further, it's =
the movies=20
themselves, not necessarily whether they are in b&w or =
color. I=20
guess a younger generation is immediately turned off to b&w, while =
purists=20
get their panties in a bunch when they want to colorize them. =
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> Time Machine: What books =
would you=20
take back with you, was not the great movie as much as the great =
writing done=20
at the turn of the century. A great pleasure is seeing the gleam in my =
young=20
sons eyes when that line was spoken. It made for hours of discussion =
for years=20
to come. </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2> As to the poster that won't =
see the=20
remake. Shame on you. You should give every new thing at least a try. =
What=20
about the War of The Worlds remake?The original was one of the best =
ever.=20
</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2><BR>-- <BR>JK Sinrod<BR>Sinrod =
Stained Glass=20
Studios<BR><A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.sinrodstudios.com">www.sinrodstudios.com</A><BR>Coney =
Island=20
Memories<BR><A=20
=
href=3D"http://www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories">www.sinrodstudios.com=
/coneymemories</A></FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></BODY></HTML >
------=_NextPart_000_003C_01C566FC.70B79B80--
|
|
|
| Re: THE SCI-FI CHANNEL [message #52581 ] |
Do, 02 Juni 2005 14:35 |
|
What would be a GREAT idea is the Sci Fi channel to bring back Mystery
Science Theater 3000 back. Which is why, naturally, the reason the Sci Fi
Channel will NEVER do it.
"Gen. Geroge Hammond" <TOKRA [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
news:aj%me.1729$_Q2.1513 [at] fe11.lga...
> Why don't they run all those old black and white "b" movies a few times
> a week that ran in the 1960's. Ya know,
> on Chiller Theater or Supernatural Theater on Saturday nights. Or good
> Sci-Fi shows, when they were good.
> Seems like the SCI-FI channel should run those movies and old shows
> instead of running
> all this crap they do most of the time. Most of it sucks anyway. Ya
> know, lets go the the center of the earth
> to jump start the magma flow again. How many of those are there?? Or
> gee wizzz, look at how big that snake is.
> Or Jason, can you rip Fredies head off. JEZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
> With such great Sci-Fi out there why do they insist on not running any
> of it???
> A great channel for Sci-Fi but they don't run anything good on it.
> Which makes the Sci-Fi channel NOT GOOD for Sci-fi,
> and that is a shame.
|
|
|
| Re: THE SCI-FI CHANNEL [message #53680 ] |
Sa, 04 Juni 2005 01:55 |
|
"Benjamin Pavsner" <pavsnerp [at] bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:5_Cne.38736$8S5.26597 [at] bignews3.bellsouth.net...
> What would be a GREAT idea is the Sci Fi channel to bring back Mystery
> Science Theater 3000 back. Which is why, naturally, the reason the Sci Fi
> Channel will NEVER do it.
I'm so sick that I would rather watch those old movies seriously, than
have them poked fun at.
--
JK Sinrod
Sinrod Stained Glass Studios
www.sinrodstudios.com
Coney Island Memories
www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories
|
|
|
| Re: THE SCI-FI CHANNEL [message #53737 ] |
Sa, 04 Juni 2005 21:41 |
|
Gen. Geroge Hammond <TOKRA [at] optonline.net> wrote:
> \< !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
Geroge,
please turn off your html formatting. It is not appropriate for usenet.
<http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/dont.html>
Thank you for your cooperation.
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Sa Mai 26 12:33:15 CEST 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,07450 Sekunden |
