|
Sprinkler Systems
Uhaul move
Lawn care
Roses and trees
Ford Parts
Chrysler Parts
Lake Powell
New IPod Touch Apps
New IPhone Apps
IPhone Apps
IPad Information
IPad Apps
Android APPS
Android Games APPS
Android Systems
Android Tablets APPS and Beyond
Smartphone Apps
Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools
Tablet PC
Car Sharing Car Leasing
Tabler Pc
Fly Fishing
Toyota Cars
Vacation Rentals
Stock market
NYSE
SSE Stock
Freight & Shipping News
Gluten
Lactose
Gout
My Coupon Life
Campgrounds Check
Outdoor
Kitchen Design and Redoo
Bath Remodeling
Palm Springs
Las Vegas Vacation Tipps
Lake Powell Boating
Homes for lease
Electric and green Car Blog
Pearls and diamonds
Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App
Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
|
Science Fiction » alt.startrek » Re: Here we are..
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47592] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 06:07 |
|
"Doug" <Doug234 [at] webtv.net> wrote in message
news:28083-42993584-506 [at] storefull-3311.bay.webtv.net...
> This is the place. Oh don't let the look of it fool you. This was once a
> beautiful place filled with people of all kinds from places all over the
> world, discussing theologies and speculations and theories of all things
> related to our beloved Battlestar Galactica. Yes it was good to be a
> reader back then..I learned a wealth of information about the
> show...areas of plot lines I had never thought of myself..little bits of
> dialog or scences that I may have missed..Oh yes, this was a delightful
> place to be.
Wrong. This place was full of Hollywood Homosexual
public relations Hacks and their unsuspecting stooges.
The hacks are still here observing what is happening and
working for their living, but the stooges who were unaware that they
were guests at Chump City here have been frightened off by the
harsh language here, as these hacks perform their real job when
someone posts criticism of the show and cannot be frightened aware.
And some of the stooges who thought they had found new friends here
have seen the light that all these people are is public relations workers.
That, in and of itself, is a positive development.
And this turmoil has all been caused by these Hacks' reaction to
a guy pointing out clear and unambiguous homosexual symbolisms
in the script and direction of the series.
Do you really think anyone other than a Paid Hack would be fighting
so desperately against simply allegations against the show ?
If these allegations are so incredible, why do these Hacks not
trust their Stooges here to figure that out ?
Politics
===================================
> What happened?...well, my son...it's about freedom of speech...and
> America. You see, in this country you have a right to your opinion. And
> in this forum everyone was freely given that right. One man decided to
> take advantage of that. After freely expressing his opinion
> once..twice..many times, and not getting the responses he was happy
> with, he decided to dominate all discussion here. He had the right to do
> that and he did. Some would attempt to debate him, some would just
> ignore him but nothing would stop him. Eventually everyone just stopped
> discussing..there was no longer any point. This one man believed his one
> opinion superceded all others and brought an end to a great place of
> wisdom and thought. Much like Alexandria, one will never know what we
> have lost.
>
> No no no! Don't cry son, there are other places to go..places that are
> moderated against things like this. Free thought is not dead
> everywhere...
>
> Just here...
>
> Turn out the lights when you leave, John.
>
> ( I absolutely positively swear..on all that is sacred on this
> planet..that I am not afilliated with any one at all from the show nor
> am I writting this in their behalf.)
>
> Goodbye old place,
>
> Douglas
>
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47593 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 06:10 |
|
|
You suck your own dick, don't you?
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47596 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 06:25 |
|
Spaz wrote:
> You suck your own dick, don't you?
Doesn't everybody? :)
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47600 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 07:03 |
|
"Doug" <Doug234 [at] webtv.net> wrote in message
news:28083-42993584-506 [at] storefull-3311.bay.webtv.net...
> This is the place. Oh don't let the look of it fool you. This was once a
> beautiful place filled with people of all kinds from places all over the
> world, discussing theologies and speculations and theories of all things
> related to our beloved Battlestar Galactica. Yes it was good to be a
> reader back then..I learned a wealth of information about the
> show...areas of plot lines I had never thought of myself..little bits of
> dialog or scences that I may have missed..Oh yes, this was a delightful
> place to be.
Wrong. This place was full of Hollywood Homosexual
public relations Hacks and their unsuspecting stooges.
The hacks are still here observing what is happening and
working for their living, but the stooges who were unaware that they
were guests at Chump City here have been frightened off by the
harsh language here, as these hacks perform their real job when
someone posts criticism of the show and cannot be frightened aware.
And some of the stooges who thought they had found new friends here
have seen the light that all these people are is public relations workers.
That, in and of itself, is a positive development.
And this turmoil has all been caused by these Hacks' reaction to
a guy pointing out clear and unambiguous homosexual symbolisms
in the script and direction of the series.
Do you really think anyone other than a Paid Hack would be fighting
so desperately against simply allegations against the show ?
If these allegations are so incredible, why do these Hacks not
trust their Stooges here to figure that out ?
Politics
===================================
> What happened?...well, my son...it's about freedom of speech...and
> America. You see, in this country you have a right to your opinion. And
> in this forum everyone was freely given that right. One man decided to
> take advantage of that. After freely expressing his opinion
> once..twice..many times, and not getting the responses he was happy
> with, he decided to dominate all discussion here. He had the right to do
> that and he did. Some would attempt to debate him, some would just
> ignore him but nothing would stop him. Eventually everyone just stopped
> discussing..there was no longer any point. This one man believed his one
> opinion superceded all others and brought an end to a great place of
> wisdom and thought. Much like Alexandria, one will never know what we
> have lost.
>
> No no no! Don't cry son, there are other places to go..places that are
> moderated against things like this. Free thought is not dead
> everywhere...
>
> Just here...
>
> Turn out the lights when you leave, John.
>
> ( I absolutely positively swear..on all that is sacred on this
> planet..that I am not afilliated with any one at all from the show nor
> am I writting this in their behalf.)
>
> Goodbye old place,
>
> Douglas
>
"Spaz" <yeah [at] right.com> wrote in message
news:E8Wdnds8X5EB3QTfRVn-oA [at] comcast.com...
> You suck your own dick, don't you?
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47604 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 08:49 |
|
Who cares?
"John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:Rdbme.1004$Pp.85 [at] fed1read01...
> "Doug" <Doug234 [at] webtv.net> wrote in message
> news:28083-42993584-506 [at] storefull-3311.bay.webtv.net...
> > This is the place. Oh don't let the look of it fool you. This was once a
> > beautiful place filled with people of all kinds from places all over the
> > world, discussing theologies and speculations and theories of all things
> > related to our beloved Battlestar Galactica. Yes it was good to be a
> > reader back then..I learned a wealth of information about the
> > show...areas of plot lines I had never thought of myself..little bits of
> > dialog or scences that I may have missed..Oh yes, this was a delightful
> > place to be.
>
> Wrong. This place was full of Hollywood Homosexual
> public relations Hacks and their unsuspecting stooges.
> The hacks are still here observing what is happening and
> working for their living, but the stooges who were unaware that they
> were guests at Chump City here have been frightened off by the
> harsh language here, as these hacks perform their real job when
> someone posts criticism of the show and cannot be frightened aware.
>
> And some of the stooges who thought they had found new friends here
> have seen the light that all these people are is public relations workers.
> That, in and of itself, is a positive development.
>
> And this turmoil has all been caused by these Hacks' reaction to
> a guy pointing out clear and unambiguous homosexual symbolisms
> in the script and direction of the series.
>
> Do you really think anyone other than a Paid Hack would be fighting
> so desperately against simply allegations against the show ?
> If these allegations are so incredible, why do these Hacks not
> trust their Stooges here to figure that out ?
>
> Politics
>
>
>
> ===================================
> > What happened?...well, my son...it's about freedom of speech...and
> > America. You see, in this country you have a right to your opinion. And
> > in this forum everyone was freely given that right. One man decided to
> > take advantage of that. After freely expressing his opinion
> > once..twice..many times, and not getting the responses he was happy
> > with, he decided to dominate all discussion here. He had the right to do
> > that and he did. Some would attempt to debate him, some would just
> > ignore him but nothing would stop him. Eventually everyone just stopped
> > discussing..there was no longer any point. This one man believed his one
> > opinion superceded all others and brought an end to a great place of
> > wisdom and thought. Much like Alexandria, one will never know what we
> > have lost.
> >
> > No no no! Don't cry son, there are other places to go..places that are
> > moderated against things like this. Free thought is not dead
> > everywhere...
> >
> > Just here...
> >
> > Turn out the lights when you leave, John.
> >
> > ( I absolutely positively swear..on all that is sacred on this
> > planet..that I am not afilliated with any one at all from the show nor
> > am I writting this in their behalf.)
> >
> > Goodbye old place,
> >
> > Douglas
> >
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47605 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 08:50 |
|
You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking" for
homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn life and get over
it.
"John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:K2cme.1012$Pp.589 [at] fed1read01...
> "Doug" <Doug234 [at] webtv.net> wrote in message
> news:28083-42993584-506 [at] storefull-3311.bay.webtv.net...
> > This is the place. Oh don't let the look of it fool you. This was once a
> > beautiful place filled with people of all kinds from places all over the
> > world, discussing theologies and speculations and theories of all things
> > related to our beloved Battlestar Galactica. Yes it was good to be a
> > reader back then..I learned a wealth of information about the
> > show...areas of plot lines I had never thought of myself..little bits of
> > dialog or scences that I may have missed..Oh yes, this was a delightful
> > place to be.
>
> Wrong. This place was full of Hollywood Homosexual
> public relations Hacks and their unsuspecting stooges.
> The hacks are still here observing what is happening and
> working for their living, but the stooges who were unaware that they
> were guests at Chump City here have been frightened off by the
> harsh language here, as these hacks perform their real job when
> someone posts criticism of the show and cannot be frightened aware.
>
> And some of the stooges who thought they had found new friends here
> have seen the light that all these people are is public relations workers.
> That, in and of itself, is a positive development.
>
> And this turmoil has all been caused by these Hacks' reaction to
> a guy pointing out clear and unambiguous homosexual symbolisms
> in the script and direction of the series.
>
> Do you really think anyone other than a Paid Hack would be fighting
> so desperately against simply allegations against the show ?
> If these allegations are so incredible, why do these Hacks not
> trust their Stooges here to figure that out ?
>
> Politics
>
>
>
> ===================================
> > What happened?...well, my son...it's about freedom of speech...and
> > America. You see, in this country you have a right to your opinion. And
> > in this forum everyone was freely given that right. One man decided to
> > take advantage of that. After freely expressing his opinion
> > once..twice..many times, and not getting the responses he was happy
> > with, he decided to dominate all discussion here. He had the right to do
> > that and he did. Some would attempt to debate him, some would just
> > ignore him but nothing would stop him. Eventually everyone just stopped
> > discussing..there was no longer any point. This one man believed his one
> > opinion superceded all others and brought an end to a great place of
> > wisdom and thought. Much like Alexandria, one will never know what we
> > have lost.
> >
> > No no no! Don't cry son, there are other places to go..places that are
> > moderated against things like this. Free thought is not dead
> > everywhere...
> >
> > Just here...
> >
> > Turn out the lights when you leave, John.
> >
> > ( I absolutely positively swear..on all that is sacred on this
> > planet..that I am not afilliated with any one at all from the show nor
> > am I writting this in their behalf.)
> >
> > Goodbye old place,
> >
> > Douglas
> >
>
>
> "Spaz" <yeah [at] right.com> wrote in message
> news:E8Wdnds8X5EB3QTfRVn-oA [at] comcast.com...
> > You suck your own dick, don't you?
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47607 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 09:16 |
|
"Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
> for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
> life and get over it.
The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
The fcat that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
sinister aspect of this exchange.
Politics
========================================
> "John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:K2cme.1012$Pp.589 [at] fed1read01...
> > "Doug" <Doug234 [at] webtv.net> wrote in message
> > news:28083-42993584-506 [at] storefull-3311.bay.webtv.net...
> > > This is the place. Oh don't let the look of it fool you. This was once
a
> > > beautiful place filled with people of all kinds from places all over
the
> > > world, discussing theologies and speculations and theories of all
things
> > > related to our beloved Battlestar Galactica. Yes it was good to be a
> > > reader back then..I learned a wealth of information about the
> > > show...areas of plot lines I had never thought of myself..little bits
of
> > > dialog or scences that I may have missed..Oh yes, this was a
delightful
> > > place to be.
> >
> > Wrong. This place was full of Hollywood Homosexual
> > public relations Hacks and their unsuspecting stooges.
> > The hacks are still here observing what is happening and
> > working for their living, but the stooges who were unaware that they
> > were guests at Chump City here have been frightened off by the
> > harsh language here, as these hacks perform their real job when
> > someone posts criticism of the show and cannot be frightened away.
> >
> > And some of the stooges who thought they had found new friends here
> > have seen the light that all these people are is public relations
workers.
> > That, in and of itself, is a positive development.
> >
> > And this turmoil has all been caused by these Hacks' reaction to
> > a guy pointing out clear and unambiguous homosexual symbolisms
> > in the script and direction of the series.
> >
> > Do you really think anyone other than a Paid Hack would be fighting
> > so desperately against simple allegations against the show ?
> > If these allegations are so incredible, why do these Hacks not
> > trust their Stooges here to figure that out ?
> >
> > Politics
> >
> >
> >
> > ===================================
> > > What happened?...well, my son...it's about freedom of speech...and
> > > America. You see, in this country you have a right to your opinion.
And
> > > in this forum everyone was freely given that right. One man decided to
> > > take advantage of that. After freely expressing his opinion
> > > once..twice..many times, and not getting the responses he was happy
> > > with, he decided to dominate all discussion here. He had the right to
do
> > > that and he did. Some would attempt to debate him, some would just
> > > ignore him but nothing would stop him. Eventually everyone just
stopped
> > > discussing..there was no longer any point. This one man believed his
one
> > > opinion superceded all others and brought an end to a great place of
> > > wisdom and thought. Much like Alexandria, one will never know what we
> > > have lost.
> > >
> > > No no no! Don't cry son, there are other places to go..places that are
> > > moderated against things like this. Free thought is not dead
> > > everywhere...
> > >
> > > Just here...
> > >
> > > Turn out the lights when you leave, John.
> > >
> > > ( I absolutely positively swear..on all that is sacred on this
> > > planet..that I am not afilliated with any one at all from the show nor
> > > am I writting this in their behalf.)
> > >
> > > Goodbye old place,
> > >
> > > Douglas
> > "Spaz" <yeah [at] right.com> wrote in message
> > news:E8Wdnds8X5EB3QTfRVn-oA [at] comcast.com...
> > > You suck your own dick, don't you?
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47608 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 09:21 |
|
"Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
news:MBdme.46945$VH2.40539 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> Who cares?
You would be surprised how many people care about
the homosexual agenda:
Here are the results from the 11 States who had the
Homosexual agenda on a ballot question a few months
ago in November 2004:
=================================
Arkansas Ballot wording: Marriage consists
only of the union of one man and one woman. Legal
status for unmarried persons which is identical or
substantially similar to marital status shall not be
valid or recognized in Arkansas, except that the
legislature may recognize a common law marriage from
another state between a man and a woman. The
legislature has the power to determine the capacity
of persons to marry, subject to this amendment, and
the legal rights, obligations, privileges, and
immunities of marriage.Result: Passed 75% to 25%
Georgia The measure amends the state constitution to
include the following statement: (a) This state
shall recognize as marriage only the union of man
and woman. Marriages between persons of the same sex
are prohibited in this state. (b) No union between
persons of the same sex shall be recognized by this
state as entitled to the benefits of marriage. This
state shall not give effect to any public act,
record, or judicial proceeding of any other state or
jurisdiction respecting a relationship between
persons of the same sex that is treated as a
marriage under the laws of such other state or
jurisdiction. The courts of this state shall have no
jurisdiction to grant a divorce or separate
maintenance with respect to any such relationship or
otherwise to consider or rule on any of the parties'
respective rights arising as a result of or in
connection with such relationship.Result: Passed 77%
to 23%.
Kentucky Only a marriage between one man and one
woman shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in
Kentucky. A legal status identical or substantially
similar to that of marriage for unmarried
individuals shall not be valid or recognized.Result:
Passed: 75% to 25%.
Michigan The measure amends the state constitution
to include the following statement: To secure and
preserve the benefits of marriage for our society
and for future generations of children, the union of
one man and one woman in marriage shall be the only
agreement recognized as a marriage or similar union
for any purpose.Result: Passed: 59% to 41%.
Mississippi The measure amends the state
constitution to read: Marriage may take place and
may be valid under the laws of this state only
between a man and a woman. A marriage in another
state or foreign jurisdiction between persons of the
same gender, regardless of when the marriage took
place, may not be recognized in this state and is
void and unenforceable under the laws of this
state.Result: Passed: 86% to 14%.
Montana The measure amends the state constitution to
read: Only a marriage between one man and one woman
shall be valid or recognized as a marriage in this
state.Result: Passed: 66% to 34%.
North Dakota The measure amends the state
constitution to include the following statement:
Marriage consists only of the legal union between a
man and a woman. No other domestic union, however
denominated, may be recognized as a marriage or
given the same or substantially equivalent
effect.Result: Passed 73% to 24%.
Ohio The measure amends the state constitution to
include the following statement: Only a union
between one man and one woman may be a marriage
valid in or recognized by this state and its
political subdivisions. This state and its political
subdivisions shall not create or recognize a legal
status for relationships of unmarried individuals
that intends to approximate the design, qualities,
significance or effect of marriage.Result: Passed
62% to 38%.
Oklahoma The measure amends the state constitution
to read: A Marriage in this state shall consist only
of the union of one man and one woman. Neither this
Constitution nor any other provision of law shall be
construed to require that marital status or the
legal incidents thereof be conferred upon unmarried
couples or groups. B. A marriage between persons of
the same gender performed in another state shall not
be recognized as valid and binding in this state as
of the date of the marriage. C. Any person knowingly
issuing a marriage license in violation of this
section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.Result:
Passed 76% to 24%.
Oregon The measure would amend the state
constitution to read: It is the policy of Oregon,
and its political subdivisions, that only a marriage
between one man and one woman shall be valid or
legally recognized as a marriage.Result: Passed 57%
to 43%.
Utah The measure amends the state constitution to
read, 1. Marriage consists only of the legal union
between a man and a woman. 2. No other domestic
status or union, however denominated, between
persons is valid or recognized or may be authorized,
sanctioned, or given the same or substantially
equivalent legal effect as a marriage. Results:
Passed 66% to 34%.
==================================
Politics
=============================================
> "John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Rdbme.1004$Pp.85 [at] fed1read01...
> > "Doug" <Doug234 [at] webtv.net> wrote in message
> > news:28083-42993584-506 [at] storefull-3311.bay.webtv.net...
> > > This is the place. Oh don't let the look of it fool you. This was once
a
> > > beautiful place filled with people of all kinds from places all over
the
> > > world, discussing theologies and speculations and theories of all
things
> > > related to our beloved Battlestar Galactica. Yes it was good to be a
> > > reader back then..I learned a wealth of information about the
> > > show...areas of plot lines I had never thought of myself..little bits
of
> > > dialog or scences that I may have missed..Oh yes, this was a
> > > delightful place to be.
> >
> > Wrong. This place was full of Hollywood Homosexual
> > public relations Hacks and their unsuspecting stooges.
> > The hacks are still here observing what is happening and
> > working for their living, but the stooges who were unaware that they
> > were guests at Chump City here have been frightened off by the
> > harsh language here, as these hacks perform their real job when
> > someone posts criticism of the show and cannot be frightened awaye.
> >
> > And some of the stooges who thought they had found new friends here
> > have seen the light that all these people are is public relations
workers.
> > That, in and of itself, is a positive development.
> >
> > And this turmoil has all been caused by these Hacks' reaction to
> > a guy pointing out clear and unambiguous homosexual symbolisms
> > in the script and direction of the series.
> >
> > Do you really think anyone other than a Paid Hack would be fighting
> > so desperately against simply allegations against the show ?
> > If these allegations are so incredible, why do these Hacks not
> > trust their Stooges here to figure that out ?
> >
> > Politics
> >
> >
> >
> > ===================================
> > > What happened?...well, my son...it's about freedom of speech...and
> > > America. You see, in this country you have a right to your opinion.
And
> > > in this forum everyone was freely given that right. One man decided to
> > > take advantage of that. After freely expressing his opinion
> > > once..twice..many times, and not getting the responses he was happy
> > > with, he decided to dominate all discussion here. He had the right to
do
> > > that and he did. Some would attempt to debate him, some would just
> > > ignore him but nothing would stop him. Eventually everyone just
stopped
> > > discussing..there was no longer any point. This one man believed his
one
> > > opinion superceded all others and brought an end to a great place of
> > > wisdom and thought. Much like Alexandria, one will never know what we
> > > have lost.
> > >
> > > No no no! Don't cry son, there are other places to go..places that are
> > > moderated against things like this. Free thought is not dead
> > > everywhere...
> > >
> > > Just here...
> > >
> > > Turn out the lights when you leave, John.
> > >
> > > ( I absolutely positively swear..on all that is sacred on this
> > > planet..that I am not afilliated with any one at all from the show nor
> > > am I writting this in their behalf.)
> > >
> > > Goodbye old place,
> > >
> > > Douglas
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|
|
|
| Where We Aren't (Was: Re: Here we are..) [message #47631 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 15:24 |
|
John Shocked wrote:
> "Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> > You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
> > for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
> > life and get over it.
>
> The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
> to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
And this is the clearest message yet that there's simply no point in
arguing or debating Schocked: In his mind there's something wrong with
*you* if you don't read homosexual imagery into everything- and, of
course, you're just a pair P.R. hack if you ever disagree.
*****
The Joker in the Eeeeeeevil Cabal Deck of Cards.
Once we lose magnetic containment, Mr. Antimatter is no longer our
friend.
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47638 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 16:46 |
|
Spaz wrote:
> You suck your own dick, don't you?
LOL!
Boy, talk about incest.
-- Fritz ...
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47640 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 16:49 |
|
John Shocked wrote:
> "Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> > You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
> > for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
> > life and get over it.
>
> The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
> to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
> The fcat that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
> have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
> sinister aspect of this exchange.
What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
-- Fritz ...
|
|
|
| Re: Where We Aren't (Was: Re: Here we are..) [message #47642 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 17:06 |
|
On 29 May 2005 06:24:44 -0700, "Bozo the Evil Klown"
<Evilklowwn [at] aol.com> wrote in message
<1117373084.472523.132180 [at] g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
>
>
>John Shocked wrote:
>> "Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
>> news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
>> > You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
>> > for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
>> > life and get over it.
>>
>> The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
>> to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
>
>
>And this is the clearest message yet that there's simply no point in
>arguing or debating Schocked: In his mind there's something wrong with
>*you* if you don't read homosexual imagery into everything- and, of
>course, you're just a pair P.R. hack if you ever disagree.
What else is there to say about John Schloked? He's psychotic, pure
and simple. Usenet is full of them. But as long as he's not hurting
anybody (and few will concede anybody actually believes his paranoid
ramblings,) he can't be arrested (although he would most certainly be
subject to psychiatric hold were his identity to become known.)
http://www.intelihealth.com/IH/ihtIH/WSIHW000/8271/8694/1880 10.html?d=dmtHealthAZ
Schizophrenia is a chronic (long-lasting) mental illness that is
difficult to define and easily misunderstood. Although symptoms may
vary widely, people with schizophrenia frequently have difficulty
recognizing reality, thinking logically, and behaving normally in
social situations. It is likely that there are multiple underlying
causes for this disorder; in fact, with 20 or 30 or more problem genes
at the root of this illness, schizophrenia is probably several
illnesses rather than one.
Schizophrenia may start as early as childhood and last throughout
life. People with this illness periodically have difficulty with their
thoughts and their perceptions. They may withdraw from social
contacts, and if not treated, they will display more symptoms and
become less functional as time passes.
Schizophrenia is one of the "psychotic" disorders. Psychosis is
defined in a variety of ways, but it is essentially an inability to
recognize reality. It can include such symptoms as delusions (false
beliefs), hallucinations (false perceptions), and disorganized speech
or behavior. Because psychosis also can be a feature of other mental
disorders, not all people who are psychotic have schizophrenia.
Symptoms in schizophrenia are defined as either "positive" or
"negative." Positive symptoms are psychotic symptoms such as
delusions, hallucinations, and disorganized behavior. Negative
symptoms are the tendency toward a restricted emotional range,
inexpressive speech, and the inability to initiate productive
activity.
Schizophrenia can be marked by a steady deterioration of logical
thinking, social skills, and behavior. These problems can contribute
to a decline in functioning in personal relationships or at work.
Self-care can also suffer.
--
Boy Toy
Toxic Toyz 4 Nasty Boyz
http://www.boytoyvideos.com
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47647 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 18:09 |
|
Fritz wrote:
> John Shocked wrote:
>
>
>>"Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
>>news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
>>
>>>You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
>>>for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
>>>life and get over it.
>>
>>The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
>>to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
>>The fcat that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
>>have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
>>sinister aspect of this exchange.
>
>
> What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
>
> -- Fritz ...
>
>
It's an anagram "Arab cast, A tit cell Agt", has something to do with
his gay bashing pro Islam platform.
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47649 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 18:27 |
|
Rex Manteca wrote:
> Fritz wrote:
> > John Shocked wrote:
> >
> >>"Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
> >>news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> >>
> >>>You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
> >>>for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
> >>>life and get over it.
> >>
> >>The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
> >>to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
> >>The fcat that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
> >>have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
> >>sinister aspect of this exchange.
> >
> > What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
> >
> It's an anagram "Arab cast, A tit cell Agt", has something to do with
> his gay bashing pro Islam platform.
Oh.
-- Fritz ...
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47654 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 20:45 |
|
"Fritz" <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in message
news:4299D5BB.9B004F49 [at] kissed.net...
> Spaz wrote:
>
>> You suck your own dick, don't you?
>
> LOL!
>
> Boy, talk about incest.
I think it's the only way he'll ever get his dick touched...
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47665 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 23:23 |
|
"Fritz" <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in message
news:4299D665.2D5DB286 [at] kissed.net...
> John Shocked wrote:
> > "Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
> > news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> > > You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
> > > for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
> > > life and get over it.
> > The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
> > to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
> > The fact that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
> > have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
> > sinister aspect of this exchange.
> What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
> -- Fritz ...
Battlestar Galactica is a TV series which Hollywood Homosexuals claim
is about science fiction, but is really a vehicle for Hollywood Homosexuals
to sell Sodomy to the masses.
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47668 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 23:30 |
|
"Rex Manteca" <RexManteca [at] adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:EbudnRjFqNTDdATfRVn-hQ [at] adelphia.com...
> Fritz wrote:
> > John Shocked wrote:
> >>"Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
> >>news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> >>>You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
> >>>for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
> >>>life and get over it.
> >>The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
> >>to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
> >>The fcat that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
> >>have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
> >>sinister aspect of this exchange.
> > What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
> > -- Fritz ...
> It's an anagram "Arab cast, A tit cell Agt", has something to do
> with his gay bashing pro Islam platform.
Sodomy is disgusting. The overwhelming majority of the country
agrees with this. What makes you think you have the right to force
Sodomy or Bestiality down the throat of the public ?
I have no interest in Islam other than that I oppose Hollywood
Homosexuals selling the US public on mass murder of Arabs/Moslems
in the content, sometimes overt sometimes covert, of TV series
after movie which claims that Arabs/Moslems must be mass murdered.
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47669 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 23:31 |
|
"Fritz" <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in message
news:4299ED70.FB8CE3F2 [at] kissed.net...
> > Fritz wrote:
> > > John Shocked wrote:
> > >>"Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
> > >>news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> > >>>You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
> > >>>for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
> > >>>life and get over it.
> > >>The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
> > >>to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
> > >>The fcat that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
> > >>have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
> > >>sinister aspect of this exchange.
> > > What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
> > It's an anagram "Arab cast, A tit cell Agt", has something to do with
> > his gay bashing pro Islam platform.
> Oh.
> -- Fritz ...
Wrong. This place was full of Hollywood Homosexual
public relations Hacks and their unsuspecting stooges.
The hacks are still here observing what is happening and
working for their living, but the stooges who were unaware that they
were guests at Chump City here have been frightened off by the
harsh language here, as these hacks perform their real job when
someone posts criticism of the show and cannot be frightened aware.
And some of the stooges who thought they had found new friends here
have seen the light that all these people are is public relations workers.
That, in and of itself, is a positive development.
And this turmoil has all been caused by these Hacks' reaction to
a guy pointing out clear and unambiguous homosexual symbolisms
in the script and direction of the series.
Do you really think anyone other than a Paid Hack would be fighting
so desperately against simply allegations against the show ?
If these allegations are so incredible, why do these Hacks not
trust their Stooges here to figure that out ?
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47670 ] |
So, 29 Mai 2005 23:33 |
|
"Fritz" <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in message
news:4299D5BB.9B004F49 [at] kissed.net...
> Spaz wrote:
> > You suck your own dick, don't you?
> LOL!
> Boy, talk about incest.
> -- Fritz ...
Seems like humor like this is common and acceptable in
Hollywood Homosexual circles.
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47699 ] |
Mo, 30 Mai 2005 04:42 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47700 ] |
Mo, 30 Mai 2005 04:42 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47762 ] |
Mo, 30 Mai 2005 10:35 |
|
John Shocked wrote:
> "Fritz" <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in message
> news:4299D665.2D5DB286 [at] kissed.net...
>
>>John Shocked wrote:
>>
>>>"Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
>>>
>>>>You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
>>>>for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
>>>>life and get over it.
>>>
>>>The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
>>>to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
>>>The fact that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
>>>have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
>>>sinister aspect of this exchange.
>>
>>What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
>>-- Fritz ...
>
>
> Battlestar Galactica is a TV series which Hollywood Homosexuals claim
> is about science fiction, but is really a vehicle for Hollywood Homosexuals
> to sell Sodomy to the masses.
>
> Politics
>
>
CLEARLY you've never had a blowjob in your lifetime. Sodemy sells
itself. $40 US per hour.
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47764 ] |
Mo, 30 Mai 2005 11:15 |
|
"Rex Manteca" <RexManteca [at] adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:lNOdnRxo6fjZTQffRVn-sA [at] adelphia.com...
> John Shocked wrote:
> > "Fritz" <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in message
> > news:4299D665.2D5DB286 [at] kissed.net...
> >>John Shocked wrote:
> >>>"Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> >>>>You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
> >>>>for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
> >>>>life and get over it.
> >>>The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
> >>>to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
> >>>The fact that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
> >>>have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
> >>>sinister aspect of this exchange.
> >>What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
> >>-- Fritz ...
> > Battlestar Galactica is a TV series which Hollywood Homosexuals claim
> > is about science fiction, but is really a vehicle for Hollywood
Homosexuals
> > to sell Sodomy to the masses.
> > Politics
> CLEARLY you've never had a blowjob in your lifetime.
> Sodomy sells itself. $40 US per hour.
===================================
News Bulletin from www.scifi.com :
http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue390/news.html
==========search 2/3 down page==========
Gaylactic Awards Presented
Organizers announced the winners of the Gaylactic Spectrum Awards,
created by the Gaylactic Network, an organization for gay, lesbian,
bisexual and transgender fans of SF, fantasy and horror.
The awards honor works that deal positively with gay characters,
themes and issues.
The Gaylactic Spectrum Awards Foundation was created in 2002 to
manage and further the mission of the awards to educate and raise
awareness of such content in SF&F. Awards were presented in three
categories for works originally released in 2003.
The 2004 Gaylactic Spectrum Awards were presented at the World
Science Fiction Convention in Boston on Sept. 5. A list of winners follows.
Best Novel
.. The Salt Roads by Nalo Hopkinson
Best Short Fiction
.. "Lark Till Dawn, Princess" by Barth Anderson
Best Other Work
.. Angels in America, by Tony Kushner, HBO, et al.
.. Gotham Central: Half a Life (issues 6-10), by Greg Rucka and Michael Lark
=====================================
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #47766 ] |
Mo, 30 Mai 2005 11:20 |
|
John Shocked wrote:
> "Rex Manteca" <RexManteca [at] adelphia.net> wrote in message
> news:lNOdnRxo6fjZTQffRVn-sA [at] adelphia.com...
>
>>John Shocked wrote:
>>
>>>"Fritz" <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in message
>>>news:4299D665.2D5DB286 [at] kissed.net...
>>>
>>>>John Shocked wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>>>news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
>>>>>
>>>>>>You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
>>>>>>for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
>>>>>>life and get over it.
>>>>>
>>>>>The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
>>>>>to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
>>>>>The fact that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
>>>>>have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
>>>>>sinister aspect of this exchange.
>>>>
>>>>What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
>>>>-- Fritz ...
>>>
>>>Battlestar Galactica is a TV series which Hollywood Homosexuals claim
>>>is about science fiction, but is really a vehicle for Hollywood
>
> Homosexuals
>
>>>to sell Sodomy to the masses.
>>>Politics
>>
>>CLEARLY you've never had a blowjob in your lifetime.
>>Sodomy sells itself. $40 US per hour.
>
>
>
> ===================================
> News Bulletin from www.scifi.com :
>
> http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue390/news.html
>
What's all this got to do with blowjobs? If they're good enough for
then President...
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #50264 ] |
Mo, 30 Mai 2005 16:46 |
|
On Mon, 30 May 2005 02:42:57 GMT, noone [at] some.domain (e) wrote in
message <R4vme.75174$CV1.19949 [at] fe02.news.easynews.com>
>In article <K2cme.1012$Pp.589 [at] fed1read01>, "John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>shlocko is stuck, everybody kick it.
It's OCD (Obsessive Compulsive Disorder.) An absolutely classic case.
This disease can be controlled with drugs. Trouble is, those who
suffer from it often fail to recognize their mental disturbance.
Public manifestation of symptoms can, however, produce a psychiatric
hold. Schlock should write a letter to the editor of his newspaper
(with his own name.) Treatment will be forthcoming.
--
Boy Toy
Toxic Toyz 4 Nasty Boyz
http://www.boytoyvideos.com
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #50272 ] |
Mo, 30 Mai 2005 19:25 |
|
John Shocked wrote:
> "Fritz" <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in message
> news:4299ED70.FB8CE3F2 [at] kissed.net...
> > > Fritz wrote:
> > > > John Shocked wrote:
> > > >>"Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
> > > >>news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> > > >>>You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
> > > >>>for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
> > > >>>life and get over it.
> > > >>The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
> > > >>to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
> > > >>The fcat that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
> > > >>have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
> > > >>sinister aspect of this exchange.
> > > > What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
> > > It's an anagram "Arab cast, A tit cell Agt", has something to do with
> > > his gay bashing pro Islam platform.
> > Oh.
> > -- Fritz ...
>
> Wrong. This place was full of Hollywood Homosexual
> public relations Hacks and their unsuspecting stooges.
> The hacks are still here observing what is happening and
> working for their living, but the stooges who were unaware that they
> were guests at Chump City here have been frightened off by the
> harsh language here, as these hacks perform their real job when
> someone posts criticism of the show and cannot be frightened aware.
>
> And some of the stooges who thought they had found new friends here
> have seen the light that all these people are is public relations workers.
> That, in and of itself, is a positive development.
>
> And this turmoil has all been caused by these Hacks' reaction to
> a guy pointing out clear and unambiguous homosexual symbolisms
> in the script and direction of the series.
>
> Do you really think anyone other than a Paid Hack would be fighting
> so desperately against simply allegations against the show ?
> If these allegations are so incredible, why do these Hacks not
> trust their Stooges here to figure that out ?
I heard Tinky Winky is gay too.
-- Fritz ...
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #50274 ] |
Mo, 30 Mai 2005 19:30 |
|
John Shocked wrote:
> "Fritz" <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in message
> news:4299D665.2D5DB286 [at] kissed.net...
> > John Shocked wrote:
> > > "Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
> > > news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> > > > You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
> > > > for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
> > > > life and get over it.
> > > The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
> > > to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
> > > The fact that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
> > > have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
> > > sinister aspect of this exchange.
> > What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
> > -- Fritz ...
>
> Battlestar Galactica is a TV series which Hollywood Homosexuals claim
> is about science fiction, but is really a vehicle for Hollywood Homosexuals
> to sell Sodomy to the masses.
Oh good. It's about time.
-- Fritz ...
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #50275 ] |
Mo, 30 Mai 2005 19:33 |
|
John Shocked wrote:
> "Fritz" <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in message
> news:4299D5BB.9B004F49 [at] kissed.net...
> > Spaz wrote:
> > > You suck your own dick, don't you?
> > LOL!
> > Boy, talk about incest.
> > -- Fritz ...
>
> Seems like humor like this is common and acceptable in
> Hollywood Homosexual circles.
I don't know about "Hollywood Homosexual circles" but
I thought it was funny.
-- Fritz ...
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #50276 ] |
Mo, 30 Mai 2005 19:29 |
|
John Shocked wrote:
> > > What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
> > > -- Fritz ...
> > It's an anagram "Arab cast, A tit cell Agt", has something to do
> > with his gay bashing pro Islam platform.
>
> Sodomy is disgusting.
I don't know, I kinda like it.
> The overwhelming majority of the country
> agrees with this. What makes you think you have the right to force
> Sodomy or Bestiality down the throat of the public ?
Strange, I always thought it was the other end.
> I have no interest in Islam other than that I oppose Hollywood
> Homosexuals selling the US public on mass murder of Arabs/Moslems
> in the content, sometimes overt sometimes covert, of TV series
> after movie which claims that Arabs/Moslems must be mass murdered.
You do seem to watch it.
Why don't you stop?
-- Fritz ...
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #50281 ] |
Mo, 30 Mai 2005 20:06 |
|
On Mon, 30 May 2005 13:30:44 -0400, Fritz <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in
message <429B4DC4.B87B859D [at] kissed.net>
>John Shocked wrote:
>
>> "Fritz" <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in message
>> news:4299D665.2D5DB286 [at] kissed.net...
>> > John Shocked wrote:
>> > > "Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
>> > > news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
>> > > > You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
>> > > > for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
>> > > > life and get over it.
>> > > The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
>> > > to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
>> > > The fact that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
>> > > have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
>> > > sinister aspect of this exchange.
>> > What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
>> > -- Fritz ...
>>
>> Battlestar Galactica is a TV series which Hollywood Homosexuals claim
>> is about science fiction, but is really a vehicle for Hollywood Homosexuals
>> to sell Sodomy to the masses.
>
>Oh good. It's about time.
>
>-- Fritz ...
I want a six-pack. To go.
--
Boy Toy
Toxic Toyz 4 Nasty Boyz
http://www.boytoyvideos.com
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #50289 ] |
Mo, 30 Mai 2005 20:50 |
|
Boy Toy wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2005 13:30:44 -0400, Fritz <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in
> message <429B4DC4.B87B859D [at] kissed.net>
>
> >John Shocked wrote:
> >
> >> "Fritz" <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in message
> >> news:4299D665.2D5DB286 [at] kissed.net...
> >> > John Shocked wrote:
> >> > > "Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
> >> > > news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> >> > > > You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
> >> > > > for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
> >> > > > life and get over it.
> >> > > The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
> >> > > to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
> >> > > The fact that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
> >> > > have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
> >> > > sinister aspect of this exchange.
> >> > What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
> >> > -- Fritz ...
> >>
> >> Battlestar Galactica is a TV series which Hollywood Homosexuals claim
> >> is about science fiction, but is really a vehicle for Hollywood Homosexuals
> >> to sell Sodomy to the masses.
> >
> >Oh good. It's about time.
> >
> >-- Fritz ...
>
> I want a six-pack. To go.
All at once?
-- Fritz ...
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #50292 ] |
Mo, 30 Mai 2005 21:25 |
|
"John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> writes:
> > > > You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
> > > > for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
> > > > life and get over it.
> > > The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
> > > to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
> > > The fact that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
> > > have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
> > > sinister aspect of this exchange.
> > What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
> > -- Fritz ...
>
> Battlestar Galactica is a TV series which Hollywood Homosexuals claim
> is about science fiction, but is really a vehicle for Hollywood Homosexuals
> to sell Sodomy to the masses.
I always thought it was _Bonanza_ without the cowboys - you had
Lorne Greene playing a patriarch of some sort, and some younger
actors who handled most of the 'action' scenes. It came out
around the time when the first 3 Starwars movies were hot, so
moving the setting from the area around Reno Nevada to one
appropriate for a "space opera" was just the usual "do what's
currently hot" approach that makes it easier to sell a show to
whomever is footing the bill.
The idea that this silly sci-fi flick is anything but a silly
sci-fi flick is idiotic. If the "sci-fi" guys think otherwise,
that is the risk of cross posting to political groups.
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #50295 ] |
Mo, 30 Mai 2005 23:45 |
|
On Mon, 30 May 2005 19:25:34 GMT, No One <noone [at] nospam.pacbell.net>
wrote in message <m364x0r03n.fsf [at] nospam.pacbell.net>
>"John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> writes:
>
>> > > > You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
>> > > > for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
>> > > > life and get over it.
>> > > The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
>> > > to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
>> > > The fact that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
>> > > have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
>> > > sinister aspect of this exchange.
>> > What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
>> > -- Fritz ...
>>
>> Battlestar Galactica is a TV series which Hollywood Homosexuals claim
>> is about science fiction, but is really a vehicle for Hollywood Homosexuals
>> to sell Sodomy to the masses.
>
>I always thought it was _Bonanza_ without the cowboys - you had
>Lorne Greene playing a patriarch of some sort, and some younger
>actors who handled most of the 'action' scenes. It came out
>around the time when the first 3 Starwars movies were hot, so
>moving the setting from the area around Reno Nevada to one
>appropriate for a "space opera" was just the usual "do what's
>currently hot" approach that makes it easier to sell a show to
>whomever is footing the bill.
>
>The idea that this silly sci-fi flick is anything but a silly
>sci-fi flick is idiotic. If the "sci-fi" guys think otherwise,
>that is the risk of cross posting to political groups.
I recall just about upchucking when I first heard the phrase "Lords of
COBOL." It must have been a brainwashing attempt by IBM.
--
Boy Toy
Toxic Toyz 4 Nasty Boyz
http://www.boytoyvideos.com
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #50296 ] |
Di, 31 Mai 2005 00:28 |
|
Boy Toy <BoyToy [at] Toyz4Boyz.com> writes:
> On Mon, 30 May 2005 19:25:34 GMT, No One <noone [at] nospam.pacbell.net>
> wrote in message <m364x0r03n.fsf [at] nospam.pacbell.net>
>
> >"John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> writes:
> >> Battlestar Galactica is a TV series which Hollywood Homosexuals
> >> claim is about science fiction, but is really a vehicle for
> >> Hollywood Homosexuals to sell Sodomy to the masses.
> >
> >I always thought it was _Bonanza_ without the cowboys - you had
> >Lorne Greene playing a patriarch of some sort, and some younger
> >actors who handled most of the 'action' scenes. ...
>
> I recall just about upchucking when I first heard the phrase "Lords of
> COBOL." It must have been a brainwashing attempt by IBM.
Then there was _2001_, with the HAL 9000. Shift each letter in "HAL" up
by one letter in the alphabet, and see what you get!
And don't forget the guy whose summarized his claim to fame after a
long career in computer-related technologies, citing his work at IBM:
"JCL is the worst language ever designed for any conceivable purpose,
and I oversaw the whole project."
I think we should clue "John Shocked" in. Given the extent of Alan
Turing's contributions to _Computer Science_, not to mention the
sexual orientation of who knows how many people who contributed
to the development of the Internet, the Internet is obviously a
"homosexual plot" to sell <insert sexual practice of your choice>
to the masses. Do not use the Internet. You will be seduced,
and in more ways than one. "John Shocked" should take whatever
steps are needed to protect himself, and pulling the plug on his
computer is a good place to start. :-)
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #50306 ] |
Di, 31 Mai 2005 03:39 |
|
"Fritz" <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in message
news:429B4DC4.B87B859D [at] kissed.net...
> John Shocked wrote:
>
>> "Fritz" <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in message
>> news:4299D665.2D5DB286 [at] kissed.net...
>> > John Shocked wrote:
>> > > "Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
>> > > news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
>> > > > You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
>> > > > for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
>> > > > life and get over it.
>> > > The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
>> > > to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
>> > > The fact that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
>> > > have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
>> > > sinister aspect of this exchange.
>> > What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
>> > -- Fritz ...
>>
>> Battlestar Galactica is a TV series which Hollywood Homosexuals claim
>> is about science fiction, but is really a vehicle for Hollywood
>> Homosexuals
>> to sell Sodomy to the masses.
>
> Oh good. It's about time.
Place my order for a full serving. Their vanilla world is so boring
otherwise.
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #50316 ] |
Di, 31 Mai 2005 09:40 |
|
"John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote in news:Rdbme.1004$Pp.85
[at] fed1read01:
> Do you really think anyone other than a Paid Hack would be fighting
> so desperately against simply allegations against the show ?
Wait! You mean the rest of you are getting paid?????
Damn! I'm getting ripped off here!
--
Rick
Visit the Entropy Productions homepage at
http://www.kringlecityconspiracy.com/entropy.htm
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #51021 ] |
Mi, 01 Juni 2005 09:08 |
|
I reprise some of the evidence here that Sodomy dominates
the Battlestar Galactica script:
1) This Battlestar Galactica series seems to have a
continuing Homosexual agenda and determination to sell
Homosexuality to the masses, by hook or by crook.
Back in the 3rd episode (Bastille Day) the whole Zerak
relationship was the producers trying to put Apollo and
Zerak in bed together.
The producers feinted with a heterosexual rape, then hit
their true target which was to show Apollo being dragged
to the ground face down in an Oz-like prison attack.
Oz (1997-2003) was a prison based TV series shown on HBO
(homosexual dominated US premium station) which was which
regularly showed prison homosexual rape and sex.
Bastille Day is known in Europe to be a major
celebratory day for European homosexuals. Apparently, in
the next episode, Zerak returns and you better believe
that the producers will be determined to reestablish and
develop the possible Homosexual relationship between
Apollo and Zerak.
Why do you think that the statements "You Can Bet Your Arse"
and "The Back Door is Open" when such prominent parts
of this weeks script (The Hand Of God), both in
reference to Apollo ?
So if you do not want to be sold Homosexuality by this
series or if you have kids you do not want to be sold
Homosexuality by this series, watch out.
2) Again in the Colonial Day episode the Battlestar
producers show us the side of Apollo they showed us in
episode 3 Bastille Day: Apollo being pulled down to the
ground face down, sunny side up in an Oz-like grappling
with another man. It should be clear now to everyone
watching this series that there is a pattern in showing
these Oz-like scenes where it appears that Apollo is
about to be raped by another man. The producers of this
series are desperate to show at the very least the
symbolism of Sodomy in the series. It is very important
to them.
3) In the BSG last episode of the season, Kobol's Last
Gleaming Part II, the Hollywood Homosexuals in control
of BSG were able to crowbar yet another Homosexual Rape
symbolism scene into the show in the scene in which
Boomer is approached and surrounded by what appears to
be around 5 semi-nude sister Boomer-copies who appear to
be just about to forcibly undress and rape her.
Her response is "oh no, this is not happening". Many
Homosexuals just love to be the first one to turn
someone, maybe your son, perhaps in that Catholic Church
rectory, onto that special secret intimacy they promote,
for the first time. They are absolutely loving this
scene. They respond to Boomer: "you're confused and
scared... but it's ok", as they forcibly take off her
helmet and start caressing her without her permission.
It appears that she is in the process of being
homosexual gang raped.
You can just imagine this scene in some women's prison
or even some sororities on some campuses with a new
inductee. Anyone seen Reform School Girls with Wendy O.
Williams " ? USA Network used to show it regularly.
Boomer says: "I am not a Cylon". Right there, the
obvious implication was that she was about to say "I am
not a Homosexual". She then says her parents are a man
and a woman: "My parents were Katherine and Abraham
Valerii."
The Boomer-copies then feed her the normal Homosexual
promotional crap that we have heard here, over and over
again, that deep inside, everyone is a homosexual: "You
can't fight destiny, Sharon. It catches up with you...
no matter what you do. Don't worry about us. We'll see
you again. We love you, sharon. And we always will."
If you listen to these Hollywood Homosexual fatcats
behind BSG, everyone is eventually going to engage in
Homosexual Sex. So Why fight the feeling. Do it now.
Call of the wild, sort of thing.
As these lines were delivered over cable TV, you better
believe that the Hollywood Homosexual fatcats behind
this series were jumping around slapping high fives. I
can just imagine a new Saturday Night Live Gays In Space
episode based on this content, except what SNL is doing
does not appear to have been approved by the Hollywood
Homosexuals fatcats so they are being a little careful
about how close they mirror the show.
One of the problems with Hollywood Homosexual scenes
like this being crowbar-ed into the script is: Should
we the viewers draw assumptions from this scene about
the direction of the overall story, or take it for what
it is -- the writers' penance to their Hollywood
Homosexual masters for putting up the money for the
production. For example, some here have assumed that in
this scene Boomer is programmed, or re-programmed to
assassinate William Adama, by this contact with her
Boomer-copy sisters. Some have even claimed that the
taking off of the helmet was significant in that it
further exposed her brain to the telepathic
communications wavelengths being sent to her.
But how can we know for sure when this scene already
serves a totally ulterior motive of the writers and
their Hollywood Homosexual fatcat masters.
========================================
Politics
"Rex Manteca" <RexManteca [at] adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:hY2dnb38QeJRRwffRVn-sQ [at] adelphia.com...
> John Shocked wrote:
> > "Rex Manteca" <RexManteca [at] adelphia.net> wrote in message
> > news:lNOdnRxo6fjZTQffRVn-sA [at] adelphia.com...
> >>John Shocked wrote:
> >>
> >>>"Fritz" <love [at] kissed.net> wrote in message
> >>>news:4299D665.2D5DB286 [at] kissed.net...
> >>>>John Shocked wrote:
> >>>>>"Frank Franklinson" <osiris [at] swfla.rr.com> wrote in message
> >>>>>news:_Cdme.70689$w15.29320 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> >>>>>>You really have to be a sick fucker to spend your time "looking"
> >>>>>>for homosexual tones in TV shows. Please, just get a god damn
> >>>>>>life and get over it.
> >>>>>The homosexual symbolisms in Battlestar Galactica are obvious
> >>>>>to any non-sheep, and are clearly intentional.
> >>>>>The fact that the Hollywood Homosexuals in control of BSG
> >>>>>have yet to admit these homosexual symbolisms is the most
> >>>>>sinister aspect of this exchange.
> >>>>What's a 'Battlestar Galactica'?
> >>>>-- Fritz ...
> >>>Battlestar Galactica is a TV series which Hollywood Homosexuals claim
> >>>is about science fiction, but is really a vehicle for Hollywood
> > Homosexuals
> >>>to sell Sodomy to the masses.
> >>>Politics
> >>CLEARLY you've never had a blowjob in your lifetime.
> >>Sodomy sells itself. $40 US per hour.
> > ===================================
> > News Bulletin from www.scifi.com :
> > http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue390/news.html
> What's all this got to do with blowjobs? If they're good enough for
> then President...
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #51025 ] |
Mi, 01 Juni 2005 09:51 |
|
Off-topic post forwarded to abuse [at] cox.net
"John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:o9dne.1707$Pp.454 [at] fed1read01...
> I reprise some of the evidence here that Sodomy dominates
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #51029 ] |
Mi, 01 Juni 2005 10:57 |
|
"Earl Grieda" <eBBDRTgrieda [at] wahooyahoo.com> wrote in message
news:_Ndne.4577$MI4.1332 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Off-topic post forwarded to abuse [at] cox.net
> "John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:o9dne.1707$Pp.454 [at] fed1read01...
> > I reprise some of the evidence here that Sodomy dominates
"Wally Waltripp aka Talladega Rastus" <Squibnick [at] webtv.net> wrote in message
news:307-42759E07-85 [at] storefull-3216.bay.webtv.net...
> Do you really think The Adventures of Cueball" is the "Holy Grail"
> against which all subsequent scifi shows are measured, Shocko? A scary
> thought. You didn't like Deep Throat 9? speaking of Cueball, d'you
> remember that ep when Riker is hitting up that...girl[?] from that
> supposedly androgynous race? Wasn't that just a shameful apologist forum
First off, define: Cueball. Sounds like a character in the series Sliders.
Second, I faintly remember Riker being involved in something
repulsive like that. You would have to post which episode name
and year it was for me to look it up and comment upon it.
If it was The Outcast, the records show that that episode
first aired 03/16/1992, which was right in the middle
of the Clinton campaign for President which I have
previously discussed as the real turning point when
Hollywood Homosexuals Neo-Conservatives took control
in Hollywood and in the country.
And it works right into the timeline of being 5 months
after the Death of Gene Roddenberry and the takeover
of the Star Trek franchise by Rick Berman.
Suddenly, the Star Trek TNG actors were being asked to
read scripts which expanded on the idea of Sodomy being
'just another life choice' and Stewart it seems, to his credit,
reacted against this.
Politics
=========================================
In these skits, Patrick Stewart says: "say No to anal sex !".
As such, Stewart, who I am sure contributed to both
of these 1994 Saturday Night Live scripts clearly wanted
to denounce the direction the Star Trek franchise took at
that time when it was taken over by Hollywood Homosexuals.
Of course, Star Trek: The Next Generation was the
Gold Standard against which all the other subsequent
science fiction shows are measured.
In 1994, this was Star Trek TNG's last year (1987-1994) and
Star Trek Deep Space Nine was the new series (1993-1999)
taking over. Gene Roddenberry died in Oct 1991, Rick
Berman took over control of the Star Trek franchise.
One clear difference between the two series was Sodomy.
ST DS9 has deep Sodomy symbolisms written directly into
the storyline
Terry Farrell (a woman) had a symbiont/symbiant inside her
which was a man. And in fact, she was referred to by Sisko
as "Old Man" on a regular basis.
In addition, this ridiculous script item allowed the Rick Berman
Hollywood Homosexuals to write into the script scenarios where
Terry Farrell (a woman; note how even the actress's name is
sexually ambiguous) has affairs physically with other women,
such as with Susanna Thompson in the episode Rejoined.
Clearly, this homosexuality which had taken over the
Star Trek franchise, was killing it, since I am sure I am
not the only guy who stopped watching Star Trek product
around this period.
Patrick Stewart as the elder statesman of the franchise
at this point clearly was intent, in the writing of these
Saturday Night Live scripts, on denouncing the
Rick Berman Hollywood Homosexuals who took over
the Star Trek franchise in 1991 and who still have control
of Star Trek content.
Here is Rick Berman encouraging homosexuals to pose him
questions about introducing Sodomy into the Star Trek
scripts by interviewing with an obscure homosexual
publication in order to generate fake support for Sodomy
on the series.
I doubt Roddenberry would even have talked to this rag.
http://www.webpan.com/dsinclair/braga2003.html
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Here we are.. [message #51030 ] |
Mi, 01 Juni 2005 11:00 |
|
|
Off-topic post forwarded to abuse [at] cox.net
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Sa Mai 26 12:27:16 CEST 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,27111 Sekunden |
