Sprinkler Systems Uhaul move Lawn care Roses and trees Ford Parts Chrysler Parts Lake Powell New IPod Touch Apps New IPhone Apps IPhone Apps IPad Information IPad Apps Android APPS Android Games APPS Android Systems Android Tablets APPS and Beyond Smartphone Apps Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools Tablet PC Car Sharing Car Leasing Tabler Pc Fly Fishing Toyota Cars Vacation Rentals Stock market NYSE SSE Stock Freight & Shipping News Gluten Lactose Gout My Coupon Life Campgrounds Check Outdoor Kitchen Design and Redoo Bath Remodeling Palm Springs Las Vegas Vacation Tipps Lake Powell Boating Homes for lease Electric and green Car Blog Pearls and diamonds Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
Reader


[Suche]  [Administrator]  [Hinweise zum Reader]  [Startseite]
Science Fiction » alt.fan.douglas-adams » new thread #37
new thread #37 [message #29815] So, 08 Mai 2005 22:36
e  
What religion was DNA?
Re: new thread #37 [message #29818 ] So, 08 Mai 2005 22:45
Ex-Leper  
Raised Catholic
turned Atheist
Re: new thread #37 [message #29823 ] So, 08 Mai 2005 22:53
e  
"Ex-Leper" <biglou114 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1115585159.567590.96360 [at] g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Raised Catholic
> turned Atheist

me too! Got an A in my Catholic Tradition class in college. And half-way
through--realized I wasn't a Catholic.
Re: new thread #37 [message #29839 ] Mo, 09 Mai 2005 02:19
Steve Marshall  
"Ex-Leper" <biglou114 [at] hotmail.com> wrote

> Raised Catholic
> turned Atheist

Bit of agnosticism in the middle !

Steve M
Re: new thread #37 [message #29840 ] Mo, 09 Mai 2005 02:20
Steve Marshall  
"someone" <e [at] mail.com> wrote

> "Ex-Leper" <biglou114 [at] hotmail.com> wrote
> > Raised Catholic
> > turned Atheist
>
> me too! Got an A in my Catholic Tradition class in college. And half-way
> through--realized I wasn't a Catholic.


Welcome to the real world !


Steve M
Re: new thread #37 [message #29856 ] Mo, 09 Mai 2005 04:08
Ramin  
Funny... from the concepts he proposes, I'd think he was a Baha'i!
Re: new thread #37 [message #29858 ] Mo, 09 Mai 2005 04:09
Tian Harter  
Ex-Leper wrote:
> Raised Catholic
> turned Atheist
>

My friend Stephanie is a Militant Agnostic. What that
means is she has an "I DON'T KNOW AND YOU DON'T EITHER"
sticker on her car.

--
Tian
Yesterday I walked a huge precinct in Oakland for Aimee
Allison with three other people. Maybe we got her a couple of
dozen votes she wouldn't have otherwise landed. Many times
we told people "your vote could make the difference."
http://tian.greens.org
Re: new thread #37 [message #29878 ] Mo, 09 Mai 2005 06:50
John Coxon  
In the two thousand and fifth year of Bob, Steve Marshall's voice said the
following, in wonderful perfect quadrophonic sound with distortion levels so
low as to make a man weep:

> "someone" <e [at] mail.com> wrote
>
>>"Ex-Leper" <biglou114 [at] hotmail.com> wrote
>>
>>>Raised Catholic
>>>turned Atheist
>>
>>me too! Got an A in my Catholic Tradition class in college. And half-way
>>through--realized I wasn't a Catholic.
>
> Welcome to the real world !

....what an intelligent comment.

You don't have to be a non-believer to live in the real world.

--
John Coxon

A day for firm decisions!!! Or is it?

Email: john[dot]coxon[at]gmail[dot]com
Website: http://alphacentauri.8k.com
Missing footnotes: http://www.nut.house.cx/cgi-bin/nemowiki.pl?ISFN
ZZ9 - the official HHGG appreciation society: http://www.zz9.org/
Re: new thread #37 [message #29896 ] Mo, 09 Mai 2005 09:13
e  
> You don't have to be a non-believer to live in the real world.

or a believer to live in the non-real world
Re: new thread #37 [message #31961 ] Mo, 09 Mai 2005 17:55
John Coxon  
On 09/05/2005 08:13, five wild Event Maelstroms swirled in vicious storms of
unreason and someone spewed up:

>>You don't have to be a non-believer to live in the real world.
>
> or a believer to live in the non-real world

That makes sense, too.

--
John Coxon

A day for firm decisions!!! Or is it?

Email: john[dot]coxon[at]gmail[dot]com
Website: http://alphacentauri.8k.com
Missing footnotes: http://www.nut.house.cx/cgi-bin/nemowiki.pl?ISFN
ZZ9 - the official HHGG appreciation society: http://www.zz9.org/
Re: new thread #37 [message #31995 ] Mo, 09 Mai 2005 23:31
Steve Marshall  
"John Coxon" <rogue_nine_1988 [at] hotmail.com> wrote

> > Welcome to the real world !
>
> ...what an intelligent comment.

Thank you. It's a sort of quote. I'm told they can be effective !


> You don't have to be a non-believer to live in the real world.

No. Everyone lives in the real world, it's just some people try to imagine
it is somehow different to the way it actually is.


Steve M
Re: new thread #37 [message #34021 ] Do, 12 Mai 2005 23:05
John Coxon  
On 09/05/2005 22:31, five wild Event Maelstroms swirled in vicious storms of
unreason and Steve Marshall spewed up:

> "John Coxon" <rogue_nine_1988 [at] hotmail.com> wrote
>
>>You don't have to be a non-believer to live in the real world.
>
> No. Everyone lives in the real world, it's just some people try to imagine
> it is somehow different to the way it actually is.

No, some people believe things which may exist and which you certainly
cannot disprove. Subtle difference.

--
John Coxon

A day for firm decisions!!! Or is it?

Email: john[dot]coxon[at]gmail[dot]com
Website: http://alphacentauri.8k.com
Missing footnotes: http://www.nut.house.cx/cgi-bin/nemowiki.pl?ISFN
ZZ9 - the official HHGG appreciation society: http://www.zz9.org/
Re: new thread #37 [message #34037 ] Fr, 13 Mai 2005 02:46
Dave Adalian  
"John Coxon" <rogue_nine_1988 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3ehuodF2psonU2 [at] individual.net...
> On 09/05/2005 22:31, five wild Event Maelstroms swirled in vicious storms
> of unreason and Steve Marshall spewed up:
>
>> "John Coxon" <rogue_nine_1988 [at] hotmail.com> wrote
>>
>>>You don't have to be a non-believer to live in the real world.
>>
>> No. Everyone lives in the real world, it's just some people try to
>> imagine
>> it is somehow different to the way it actually is.
>
> No, some people believe things which may exist and which you certainly
> cannot disprove. Subtle difference.
>

I also cannot prove that a giant pink egg-laying bunny doesn't deliver
colored chicken ova on Easter morning either, but that doesn't mean I
believe it happens.


Chiggy.
Re: new thread #37 [message #35655 ] Sa, 14 Mai 2005 11:46
Kaare Fiedler Christi  
Dave Adalian wrote:
> "John Coxon" <rogue_nine_1988 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3ehuodF2psonU2 [at] individual.net...
>
>>On 09/05/2005 22:31, five wild Event Maelstroms swirled in vicious storms
>>of unreason and Steve Marshall spewed up:
>>
>>
>>>"John Coxon" <rogue_nine_1988 [at] hotmail.com> wrote
>>>
>>>
>>>>You don't have to be a non-believer to live in the real world.
>>>
>>>No. Everyone lives in the real world, it's just some people try to
>>>imagine
>>>it is somehow different to the way it actually is.
>>
>>No, some people believe things which may exist and which you certainly
>>cannot disprove. Subtle difference.
>
> I also cannot prove that a giant pink egg-laying bunny doesn't deliver
> colored chicken ova on Easter morning either, but that doesn't mean I
> believe it happens.

Please stop the religious discussions, there has never yet been asny
incident of anyone convincing anyone else for or against religion on usenet.

I'm all for using AFDA for discussing whether DNA was atheist/agnostic
in certain parts of his life, whether he was raised as a catholic, what
exactly atheism means or indeed agnosticism, and such like.

But let's lay off the discussions about personal belief, and whether
anyone who believes one thing or the other or not at all is at fault
when doing so. It will only end badly, the froup has been down that road
before.

So, unless anyone here has a personal belief in The Coming Of The Great
White Handkerchief, which is one subject we can hardly call off topic, I
suggest we all settle down with a nice cup of tea.

Best
Kåre
Re: new thread #37 [message #35702 ] Sa, 14 Mai 2005 23:33
Dave Adalian  
"Kaare Fiedler Christiansen" <news [at] kaarefc.dk> wrote in message
news:4285c906$0$682$edfadb0f [at] dread16.news.tele.dk...
>
> Please stop the religious discussions, there has never yet been asny
> incident of anyone convincing anyone else for or against religion on
> usenet.
>
> I'm all for using AFDA for discussing whether DNA was atheist/agnostic in
> certain parts of his life, whether he was raised as a catholic, what
> exactly atheism means or indeed agnosticism, and such like.
>
> But let's lay off the discussions about personal belief, and whether
> anyone who believes one thing or the other or not at all is at fault when
> doing so. It will only end badly, the froup has been down that road
> before.
>
> So, unless anyone here has a personal belief in The Coming Of The Great
> White Handkerchief, which is one subject we can hardly call off topic, I
> suggest we all settle down with a nice cup of tea.
>

Better yet, why don't you just ignore the things that don't interest or
somehow disturb you and let the rest of us think for ourselves? Seems more
workable than you running from post to post giving stage directions.


Chiggy.
Re: new thread #37 [message #35745 ] So, 15 Mai 2005 11:12
John Coxon  
On 14/05/2005 22:33, five wild Event Maelstroms swirled in vicious storms of
unreason and Dave Adalian spewed up:

> "Kaare Fiedler Christiansen" <news [at] kaarefc.dk> wrote in message
> news:4285c906$0$682$edfadb0f [at] dread16.news.tele.dk...
>
>>Please stop the religious discussions, there has never yet been asny
>>incident of anyone convincing anyone else for or against religion on
>>usenet.
>>
>>I'm all for using AFDA for discussing whether DNA was atheist/agnostic in
>>certain parts of his life, whether he was raised as a catholic, what
>>exactly atheism means or indeed agnosticism, and such like.
>>
>>But let's lay off the discussions about personal belief, and whether
>>anyone who believes one thing or the other or not at all is at fault when
>>doing so. It will only end badly, the froup has been down that road
>>before.
>>
>>So, unless anyone here has a personal belief in The Coming Of The Great
>>White Handkerchief, which is one subject we can hardly call off topic, I
>>suggest we all settle down with a nice cup of tea.
>
> Better yet, why don't you just ignore the things that don't interest or
> somehow disturb you and let the rest of us think for ourselves? Seems more
> workable than you running from post to post giving stage directions.

Dave, I'm not arguing - if you think you can prove the non-existence of God
that's your delusion. Kaare is right. Theology does not belong here.
There are plenty of places you can get heated up about it elsewhere, so look
there if you want a discussion about it.

--
John Coxon

A day for firm decisions!!! Or is it?

Email: john[dot]coxon[at]gmail[dot]com
Website: http://alphacentauri.8k.com
Missing footnotes: http://www.nut.house.cx/cgi-bin/nemowiki.pl?ISFN
ZZ9 - the official HHGG appreciation society: http://www.zz9.org/
Re: new thread #37 [message #35763 ] So, 15 Mai 2005 14:37
Kaare Fiedler Christi  
Dave Adalian wrote:
> "Kaare Fiedler Christiansen" <news [at] kaarefc.dk> wrote in message
> news:4285c906$0$682$edfadb0f [at] dread16.news.tele.dk...
>
>>Please stop the religious discussions, there has never yet been asny
>>incident of anyone convincing anyone else for or against religion on
>>usenet.
>>
>>I'm all for using AFDA for discussing whether DNA was atheist/agnostic in
>>certain parts of his life, whether he was raised as a catholic, what
>>exactly atheism means or indeed agnosticism, and such like.
>>
>>But let's lay off the discussions about personal belief, and whether
>>anyone who believes one thing or the other or not at all is at fault when
>>doing so. It will only end badly, the froup has been down that road
>>before.
>>
>>So, unless anyone here has a personal belief in The Coming Of The Great
>>White Handkerchief, which is one subject we can hardly call off topic, I
>>suggest we all settle down with a nice cup of tea.
>>
>
>
> Better yet, why don't you just ignore the things that don't interest or
> somehow disturb you and let the rest of us think for ourselves? Seems more
> workable than you running from post to post giving stage directions.

I was just trying to be helpfoul and stop a discussion that doesn't
belong here.

If you really feel you don't want that, why didn't _you_ ignore _my_
posting, taking your own advice?

Best
Kåre
Re: new thread #37 [message #35786 ] So, 15 Mai 2005 21:06
Dave Adalian  
"Kaare Fiedler Christiansen" <news [at] kaarefc.dk> wrote in message
news:4287429b$0$706$edfadb0f [at] dread16.news.tele.dk...
> Dave Adalian wrote:
>> "Kaare Fiedler Christiansen" <news [at] kaarefc.dk> wrote in message
>> news:4285c906$0$682$edfadb0f [at] dread16.news.tele.dk...
>>
>>>Please stop the religious discussions, there has never yet been asny
>>>incident of anyone convincing anyone else for or against religion on
>>>usenet.
>>>
>>>I'm all for using AFDA for discussing whether DNA was atheist/agnostic in
>>>certain parts of his life, whether he was raised as a catholic, what
>>>exactly atheism means or indeed agnosticism, and such like.
>>>
>>>But let's lay off the discussions about personal belief, and whether
>>>anyone who believes one thing or the other or not at all is at fault when
>>>doing so. It will only end badly, the froup has been down that road
>>>before.
>>>
>>>So, unless anyone here has a personal belief in The Coming Of The Great
>>>White Handkerchief, which is one subject we can hardly call off topic, I
>>>suggest we all settle down with a nice cup of tea.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Better yet, why don't you just ignore the things that don't interest or
>> somehow disturb you and let the rest of us think for ourselves? Seems
>> more workable than you running from post to post giving stage directions.
>
> I was just trying to be helpfoul and stop a discussion that doesn't belong
> here.
>
> If you really feel you don't want that, why didn't _you_ ignore _my_
> posting, taking your own advice?
>

Couple of reasons. Because I don't understand your overriding desire to
tell others what to do and I'm fascinated by your complete lack of ability
to recognize this flaw in yourself--I'm astounded that you actually feel
justified in the way your behave toward others and that you feel you're
acting in the best interest of everyone. Also, I hate having others tell me
what to do because they think they know better; bullies piss me off.


Chiggy.
Re: new thread #37 [message #35788 ] So, 15 Mai 2005 21:08
Dave Adalian  
"John Coxon" <rogue_nine_1988 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3eohvvF453cgU3 [at] individual.net...
> On 14/05/2005 22:33, five wild Event Maelstroms swirled in vicious storms
> of unreason and Dave Adalian spewed up:
>
>> "Kaare Fiedler Christiansen" <news [at] kaarefc.dk> wrote in message
>> news:4285c906$0$682$edfadb0f [at] dread16.news.tele.dk...
>>
>>>Please stop the religious discussions, there has never yet been asny
>>>incident of anyone convincing anyone else for or against religion on
>>>usenet.
>>>
>>>I'm all for using AFDA for discussing whether DNA was atheist/agnostic in
>>>certain parts of his life, whether he was raised as a catholic, what
>>>exactly atheism means or indeed agnosticism, and such like.
>>>
>>>But let's lay off the discussions about personal belief, and whether
>>>anyone who believes one thing or the other or not at all is at fault when
>>>doing so. It will only end badly, the froup has been down that road
>>>before.
>>>
>>>So, unless anyone here has a personal belief in The Coming Of The Great
>>>White Handkerchief, which is one subject we can hardly call off topic, I
>>>suggest we all settle down with a nice cup of tea.
>>
>> Better yet, why don't you just ignore the things that don't interest or
>> somehow disturb you and let the rest of us think for ourselves? Seems
>> more workable than you running from post to post giving stage directions.
>
> Dave, I'm not arguing - if you think you can prove the non-existence of
> God that's your delusion. Kaare is right. Theology does not belong here.
> There are plenty of places you can get heated up about it elsewhere, so
> look there if you want a discussion about it.
>

I'm not heated up nor am I attempting to disprove the existence of a god.
I'm just pointing out the glaring flaw in your reasoning. By the by, it
wasn't me who started this discussion; I just couldn't resist pointing out
that whopping failure of logic on your part.


Chiggy.
Re: new thread #37 [message #35790 ] So, 15 Mai 2005 21:55
Kaare Fiedler Christi  
Dave Adalian wrote:
> "Kaare Fiedler Christiansen" <news [at] kaarefc.dk> wrote in message
> news:4287429b$0$706$edfadb0f [at] dread16.news.tele.dk...
>
>>Dave Adalian wrote:
>>
>>>"Kaare Fiedler Christiansen" <news [at] kaarefc.dk> wrote in message
>>>news:4285c906$0$682$edfadb0f [at] dread16.news.tele.dk...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Please stop the religious discussions, there has never yet been asny
>>>>incident of anyone convincing anyone else for or against religion on
>>>>usenet.
>>>>
>>>>I'm all for using AFDA for discussing whether DNA was atheist/agnostic in
>>>>certain parts of his life, whether he was raised as a catholic, what
>>>>exactly atheism means or indeed agnosticism, and such like.
>>>>
>>>>But let's lay off the discussions about personal belief, and whether
>>>>anyone who believes one thing or the other or not at all is at fault when
>>>>doing so. It will only end badly, the froup has been down that road
>>>>before.
>>>>
>>>>So, unless anyone here has a personal belief in The Coming Of The Great
>>>>White Handkerchief, which is one subject we can hardly call off topic, I
>>>>suggest we all settle down with a nice cup of tea.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Better yet, why don't you just ignore the things that don't interest or
>>>somehow disturb you and let the rest of us think for ourselves? Seems
>>>more workable than you running from post to post giving stage directions.
>>
>>I was just trying to be helpfoul and stop a discussion that doesn't belong
>>here.
>>
>>If you really feel you don't want that, why didn't _you_ ignore _my_
>>posting, taking your own advice?
>>
>
>
> Couple of reasons. Because I don't understand your overriding desire to
> tell others what to do and I'm fascinated by your complete lack of ability
> to recognize this flaw in yourself--I'm astounded that you actually feel
> justified in the way your behave toward others and that you feel you're
> acting in the best interest of everyone. Also, I hate having others tell me
> what to do because they think they know better; bullies piss me off.

Interesting you should say something about seeing flaws in oneself...

Best
Kåre
Re: new thread #37 [message #35794 ] So, 15 Mai 2005 23:34
John Coxon  
On 15/05/2005 20:06, five wild Event Maelstroms swirled in vicious storms of
unreason and Dave Adalian spewed up:

> "Kaare Fiedler Christiansen" <news [at] kaarefc.dk> wrote in message
> news:4287429b$0$706$edfadb0f [at] dread16.news.tele.dk...
>
>>Dave Adalian wrote:
>>
>>>"Kaare Fiedler Christiansen" <news [at] kaarefc.dk> wrote in message
>>>news:4285c906$0$682$edfadb0f [at] dread16.news.tele.dk...
>>>
>>>>Please stop the religious discussions, there has never yet been asny
>>>>incident of anyone convincing anyone else for or against religion on
>>>>usenet.
>>>>
>>>>I'm all for using AFDA for discussing whether DNA was atheist/agnostic in
>>>>certain parts of his life, whether he was raised as a catholic, what
>>>>exactly atheism means or indeed agnosticism, and such like.
>>>>
>>>>But let's lay off the discussions about personal belief, and whether
>>>>anyone who believes one thing or the other or not at all is at fault when
>>>>doing so. It will only end badly, the froup has been down that road
>>>>before.
>>>>
>>>>So, unless anyone here has a personal belief in The Coming Of The Great
>>>>White Handkerchief, which is one subject we can hardly call off topic, I
>>>>suggest we all settle down with a nice cup of tea.
>>>
>>>Better yet, why don't you just ignore the things that don't interest or
>>>somehow disturb you and let the rest of us think for ourselves? Seems
>>>more workable than you running from post to post giving stage directions.
>>
>>I was just trying to be helpfoul and stop a discussion that doesn't belong
>>here.
>>
>>If you really feel you don't want that, why didn't _you_ ignore _my_
>>posting, taking your own advice?
>
> Couple of reasons. Because I don't understand your overriding desire to
> tell others what to do and I'm fascinated by your complete lack of ability
> to recognize this flaw in yourself--I'm astounded that you actually feel
> justified in the way your behave toward others and that you feel you're
> acting in the best interest of everyone. Also, I hate having others tell me
> what to do because they think they know better; bullies piss me off.

We don't think we know better. But the froup isn't a theological discussion
group, under any circumstances.

--
John Coxon

A day for firm decisions!!! Or is it?

Email: john[dot]coxon[at]gmail[dot]com
Website: http://alphacentauri.8k.com
Missing footnotes: http://www.nut.house.cx/cgi-bin/nemowiki.pl?ISFN
ZZ9 - the official HHGG appreciation society: http://www.zz9.org/
Re: new thread #37 [message #35795 ] So, 15 Mai 2005 23:35
John Coxon  
On 15/05/2005 20:08, five wild Event Maelstroms swirled in vicious storms of
unreason and Dave Adalian spewed up:

> "John Coxon" <rogue_nine_1988 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3eohvvF453cgU3 [at] individual.net...
>
>>On 14/05/2005 22:33, five wild Event Maelstroms swirled in vicious storms
>>of unreason and Dave Adalian spewed up:
>>
>>>"Kaare Fiedler Christiansen" <news [at] kaarefc.dk> wrote in message
>>>news:4285c906$0$682$edfadb0f [at] dread16.news.tele.dk...
>>>
>>>>Please stop the religious discussions, there has never yet been asny
>>>>incident of anyone convincing anyone else for or against religion on
>>>>usenet.
>>>>
>>>>I'm all for using AFDA for discussing whether DNA was atheist/agnostic in
>>>>certain parts of his life, whether he was raised as a catholic, what
>>>>exactly atheism means or indeed agnosticism, and such like.
>>>>
>>>>But let's lay off the discussions about personal belief, and whether
>>>>anyone who believes one thing or the other or not at all is at fault when
>>>>doing so. It will only end badly, the froup has been down that road
>>>>before.
>>>>
>>>>So, unless anyone here has a personal belief in The Coming Of The Great
>>>>White Handkerchief, which is one subject we can hardly call off topic, I
>>>>suggest we all settle down with a nice cup of tea.
>>>
>>>Better yet, why don't you just ignore the things that don't interest or
>>>somehow disturb you and let the rest of us think for ourselves? Seems
>>>more workable than you running from post to post giving stage directions.
>>
>>Dave, I'm not arguing - if you think you can prove the non-existence of
>>God that's your delusion. Kaare is right. Theology does not belong here.
>>There are plenty of places you can get heated up about it elsewhere, so
>>look there if you want a discussion about it.
>
> I'm not heated up nor am I attempting to disprove the existence of a god.
> I'm just pointing out the glaring flaw in your reasoning. By the by, it
> wasn't me who started this discussion; I just couldn't resist pointing out
> that whopping failure of logic on your part.

What failure of logic? Me telling you that the existence of God cannot be
proved or disproved? That's not a failure of logic, that's just true.

--
John Coxon

A day for firm decisions!!! Or is it?

Email: john[dot]coxon[at]gmail[dot]com
Website: http://alphacentauri.8k.com
Missing footnotes: http://www.nut.house.cx/cgi-bin/nemowiki.pl?ISFN
ZZ9 - the official HHGG appreciation society: http://www.zz9.org/
Re: new thread #37 [message #35802 ] Mo, 16 Mai 2005 00:44
Dave Adalian  
"John Coxon" <rogue_nine_1988 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3eptf3F4doojU2 [at] individual.net...
>
> We don't think we know better. But the froup isn't a theological
> discussion group, under any circumstances.
>

What about discussing God's final message to his creation? Would this not
be an on-topic discussion that ventures into the theological or one that
could be reasonably expected to do so? Never say never.

And, if that sort of thing, in your opinion, doesn't belong here, then why
are you participating?


Chiggy.
Re: new thread #37 [message #35832 ] Mo, 16 Mai 2005 16:26
John Coxon  
On 15/05/2005 23:44, five wild Event Maelstroms swirled in vicious storms of
unreason and Dave Adalian spewed up:

> "John Coxon" <rogue_nine_1988 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3eptf3F4doojU2 [at] individual.net...
>
>>We don't think we know better. But the froup isn't a theological
>>discussion group, under any circumstances.
>>
>
>
> What about discussing God's final message to his creation? Would this not
> be an on-topic discussion that ventures into the theological or one that
> could be reasonably expected to do so? Never say never.
>
> And, if that sort of thing, in your opinion, doesn't belong here, then why
> are you participating?

I stopped participating, if you notice. It was over a day between your last
post and Kaare stepping in - if I'd wanted to reply I would have done so in
that gap. I saw you were arguing impossible points, I stopped arguing
because I don't enjoy that sort of argument, and it's not what the froup's for.

--
John Coxon

A day for firm decisions!!! Or is it?

Email: john[dot]coxon[at]gmail[dot]com
Website: http://alphacentauri.8k.com
Missing footnotes: http://www.nut.house.cx/cgi-bin/nemowiki.pl?ISFN
ZZ9 - the official HHGG appreciation society: http://www.zz9.org/
Re: new thread #37 [message #35874 ] Mo, 16 Mai 2005 23:57
some.one  
>... By the by, it wasn't me who started this discussion;

I'm sorry... embarrassed about where it went. Was just trying to start a
light-hearted threat--er, thread. ...stupid fingers!
Re: new thread #37 [message #35875 ] Di, 17 Mai 2005 00:02
some.one  
>... Kaare is right. Theology does not belong here.

I beg to differ.... please, please, please let "theology" belong here.
It's the un-freaking-censored Internet! Anything goes! Mr. Adams had
thoughts and opinions on religion. We all should! But if the "discussion"
gets personal and nasty then it's time to move on.
Vorheriges Thema:Missed it! (first ep of new radio series)
Nächstes Thema:thumb drive
Gehe zu:
  


aktuelle Zeit: Sa Mai 26 11:03:04 CEST 2012

Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,03139 Sekunden
.:: Startseite - Hinweise - Impressum ::.

Powered