|
Sprinkler Systems
Uhaul move
Lawn care
Roses and trees
Ford Parts
Chrysler Parts
Lake Powell
New IPod Touch Apps
New IPhone Apps
IPhone Apps
IPad Information
IPad Apps
Android APPS
Android Games APPS
Android Systems
Android Tablets APPS and Beyond
Smartphone Apps
Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools
Tablet PC
Car Sharing Car Leasing
Tabler Pc
Fly Fishing
Toyota Cars
Vacation Rentals
Stock market
NYSE
SSE Stock
Freight & Shipping News
Gluten
Lactose
Gout
My Coupon Life
Campgrounds Check
Outdoor
Kitchen Design and Redoo
Bath Remodeling
Palm Springs
Las Vegas Vacation Tipps
Lake Powell Boating
Homes for lease
Electric and green Car Blog
Pearls and diamonds
Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App
Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
|
Science Fiction » alt.startrek » Hollywood Homosexual Neo-Conservative Nexus Evidence
| Hollywood Homosexual Neo-Conservative Nexus Evidence [message #28486] |
So, 08 Mai 2005 02:30 |
|
"cloud dreamer" <invalid [at] invalid.com> wrote in message
news:116t8co2ct59c7 [at] corp.supernews.com...
> D C wrote:
> > Yeah, I know. "Killfile him."
> > But, you know what?
> > That's like driving by a car flipped over in the road, and ignoring it.
> Trying to "do something" for John is like trying to something for a
> member of the KKK. They've got their mind made up. Nothing short of a
> brain injury will change their minds.
Wrong. The Right has changed dramatically, to the point that there is a new
political group or cult called Neo-Conservatives, who love Sodomy, and they
are in control of our Bush government right now.
They are essentially similar to regular Conservatives, except they have no
religious compunctions about Sodomy and they want to murder as many Arabs
as US tax money can buy.
Hollywood Homosexuals are a very similar group to the group well known
as Neo-Conservatives or Neo-Cons.
They generally are Conservatives who believe vehemently in Sodomy,
Israel and Individual Rights for people to engage in any kind of
behavior they want, with no moral societal rules.
Since most people do not know what a Neo-Conservative is and there
still exists some debate about their views, I use "Hollywood Homosexuals"
instead, because it directly addresses what I am concerned about and
is easier to understand.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism_%28United_State s%29
http://www.hppub.com/dadtseq/gaycon.htm
Neo-Conservatives are the main propellants in this country of the
extermination of Arabs in the Middle East.
They are the ones who contributed huge amounts of money to Bush
and to the Conservative Think Tanks to develop the anti-Iraq coalition
and many people believe they have hijacked US Foreign Policy.
And Neo-Conservatives support Sodomy big time.
Read this:
http://www.fpif.org/papers/2004evangelical.html
========excerpt==================
Finally, the Christian right's access to power has been greatly
aided by the ties it has developed with neoconservatives
influential within the present administration. Neoconservative
intellectuals, many of them Jewish, may seem unlikely allies
for the Christian right, but this partnership has developed
across several issue areas. The most important basis for
this partnership is a common support for Israel or, to put
it more accurately, for the Likud Party's vision of Israel's
interests. The Christian right's support for Israel harks back
to the movement's beginnings in the late 1970s, but it has
risen to a higher level in the last few years. The 2002 annual
convention of the Christian Coalition culminated in a rally
for Israel, and Ralph Reed and Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein
recently founded a new group, Stand for Israel. Meanwhile,
throughout Christian right media, criticism of the Palestinians
and support for hard-line Israeli policies has grown more intense.
===========end of excerpt==========
Thus, BSG selling Sodomy to your Son has a lot of support within
Washington, even though the Bush admninistration claims to be
super religious. Money Talks, and the Neo-Conservatives haves
tons and tons of money to buy politicians.
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexual Neo-Conservative Nexus Evidence [message #28488 ] |
So, 08 Mai 2005 02:42 |
|
On Sat, 7 May 2005 17:30:51 -0700, "John Shocked"
<jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>"cloud dreamer" <invalid [at] invalid.com> wrote in message
>news:116t8co2ct59c7 [at] corp.supernews.com...
>> D C wrote:
>> > Yeah, I know. "Killfile him."
>> > But, you know what?
>> > That's like driving by a car flipped over in the road, and ignoring it.
>> Trying to "do something" for John is like trying to something for a
>> member of the KKK. They've got their mind made up. Nothing short of a
>> brain injury will change their minds.
>
>Wrong. The Right has changed dramatically, to the point that there is a new
>political group or cult called Neo-Conservatives, who love Sodomy, and they
>are in control of our Bush government right now.
>They are essentially similar to regular Conservatives, except they have no
>religious compunctions about Sodomy and they want to murder as many Arabs
>as US tax money can buy.
>
>Hollywood Homosexuals are a very similar group to the group well known
>as Neo-Conservatives or Neo-Cons.
>They generally are Conservatives who believe vehemently in Sodomy,
>Israel and Individual Rights for people to engage in any kind of
>behavior they want, with no moral societal rules.
>Since most people do not know what a Neo-Conservative is and there
>still exists some debate about their views, I use "Hollywood Homosexuals"
>instead, because it directly addresses what I am concerned about and
>is easier to understand.
Hollywood is disproportionately run by Jews and they do not
adhere to conservative policies or philosophy except when it comes to:
-Money
-Being too cowardly to put real villains in movies. Mostly because,
they might get sued, and that would cost them...money.
But they are not "neo-conservatives." That would clash
with their predominantly left-lib, drug-addict lifestyles.
-Rich
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexual Neo-Conservative Nexus Evidence [message #28493 ] |
So, 08 Mai 2005 04:01 |
|
"RichA" <none [at] none.com> wrote in message
news:tunq71ld15pkkfmct4pfs005pvh7jlnpdq [at] 4ax.com...
> On Sat, 7 May 2005 17:30:51 -0700, "John Shocked"
> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
> >"cloud dreamer" <invalid [at] invalid.com> wrote in message
> >news:116t8co2ct59c7 [at] corp.supernews.com...
> >> D C wrote:
> >> > Yeah, I know. "Killfile him."
> >> > But, you know what?
> >> > That's like driving by a car flipped over in the road, and ignoring
it.
> >> Trying to "do something" for John is like trying to something for a
> >> member of the KKK. They've got their mind made up. Nothing short of a
> >> brain injury will change their minds.
> >Wrong. The Right has changed dramatically, to the point that there is a
new
> >political group or cult called Neo-Conservatives, who love Sodomy, and
they
> >are in control of our Bush government right now.
> >They are essentially similar to regular Conservatives, except they have
no
> >religious compunctions about Sodomy and they want to murder as many Arabs
> >as US tax money can buy.
> >Hollywood Homosexuals are a very similar group to the group well known
> >as Neo-Conservatives or Neo-Cons.
> >They generally are Conservatives who believe vehemently in Sodomy,
> >Israel and Individual Rights for people to engage in any kind of
> >behavior they want, with no moral societal rules.
> >Since most people do not know what a Neo-Conservative is and there
> >still exists some debate about their views, I use "Hollywood Homosexuals"
> >instead, because it directly addresses what I am concerned about and
> >is easier to understand.
> Hollywood is disproportionately run by Jews and they do not
> adhere to conservative policies or philosophy except when it comes to:
> -Money
> -Being too cowardly to put real villains in movies. Mostly because,
> they might get sued, and that would cost them...money.
> But they are not "neo-conservatives." That would clash
> with their predominantly left-lib, drug-addict lifestyles.
> -Rich
I believe that David Geffen, one of the Hollywood Homosexual chieftains
in Hollywood is both homosexual and jewish.
Theyare conservative, but the media is succeeding in training you to believe
that ACLU type issues like Sodomy and Drugs Legalization/De-Criminalization
are left issues, when in fact they are not just conservative, but
libertarian issues.
"Civil Liberties" implies Libertarian.
There is no relationship between Civil Rights and Civil Liberties.
None whatsoever. They just share one common word.
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexual Neo-Conservative Nexus Evidence [message #28508 ] |
So, 08 Mai 2005 05:11 |
|
>
> Politics
>
John reminds me of that guy from DS9 who was on the run from the Soulless
Minions of Orthodoxy. (Best episode ever)
(see, I made it about StarTrek)
--
Eric Nichols
Psalm 138:8
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexual Neo-Conservative Nexus Evidence [message #28516 ] |
So, 08 Mai 2005 05:45 |
|
"Eric Nichols" <sugarbearnichols [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Vrffe.2620$1o3.1054 [at] newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
> > Politics
> John reminds me of that guy from DS9 who was on the run from the Soulless
> Minions of Orthodoxy. (Best episode ever)
> (see, I made it about StarTrek)
> Eric Nichols
Looks like this guy is proud he especially looked up some
information about these TV science fiction series so that he
could claim his response to me referred to one of the TV shows.
Of course, this is not the Star Trek Deep Space Nine Newsgroup.
However, it is true that DS9 was responsible for the killing
off of the whole Star Trek series of series by introducing
Sodomy into the storyline.
Of course, I did not see the episode in question because DS9
was homosexual promotional crap and resulted in bad ratings
for Star Trek and the eventual death of the series..
Politics
"cloud dreamer" <invalid [at] invalid.com> wrote in message
news:116t8co2ct59c7 [at] corp.supernews.com...
> D C wrote:
> > Yeah, I know. "Killfile him."
> > But, you know what?
> > That's like driving by a car flipped over in the road, and ignoring it.
> Trying to "do something" for John is like trying to something for a
> member of the KKK. They've got their mind made up. Nothing short of a
> brain injury will change their minds.
Wrong. The Right has changed dramatically, to the point that there is a new
political group or cult called Neo-Conservatives, who love Sodomy, and they
are in control of our Bush government right now.
They are essentially similar to regular Conservatives, except they have no
religious compunctions about Sodomy and they want to murder as many Arabs
as US tax money can buy.
Hollywood Homosexuals are a very similar group to the group well known
as Neo-Conservatives or Neo-Cons.
They generally are Conservatives who believe vehemently in Sodomy,
Israel and Individual Rights for people to engage in any kind of
behavior they want, with no moral societal rules.
Since most people do not know what a Neo-Conservative is and there
still exists some debate about their views, I use "Hollywood Homosexuals"
instead, because it directly addresses what I am concerned about and
is easier to understand.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoconservatism_%28United_State s%29
http://www.hppub.com/dadtseq/gaycon.htm
Neo-Conservatives are the main propellants in this country of the
extermination of Arabs in the Middle East.
They are the ones who contributed huge amounts of money to Bush
and to the Conservative Think Tanks to develop the anti-Iraq coalition
and many people believe they have hijacked US Foreign Policy.
And Neo-Conservatives support Sodomy big time.
Read this:
http://www.fpif.org/papers/2004evangelical.html
========excerpt==================
Finally, the Christian right's access to power has been greatly
aided by the ties it has developed with neoconservatives
influential within the present administration. Neoconservative
intellectuals, many of them Jewish, may seem unlikely allies
for the Christian right, but this partnership has developed
across several issue areas. The most important basis for
this partnership is a common support for Israel or, to put
it more accurately, for the Likud Party's vision of Israel's
interests. The Christian right's support for Israel harks back
to the movement's beginnings in the late 1970s, but it has
risen to a higher level in the last few years. The 2002 annual
convention of the Christian Coalition culminated in a rally
for Israel, and Ralph Reed and Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein
recently founded a new group, Stand for Israel. Meanwhile,
throughout Christian right media, criticism of the Palestinians
and support for hard-line Israeli policies has grown more intense.
===========end of excerpt==========
Thus, BSG selling Sodomy to your Son has a lot of support within
Washington, even though the Bush admninistration claims to be
super religious. Money Talks, and the Neo-Conservatives haves
tons and tons of money to buy politicians.
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexual Neo-Conservative Nexus Evidence [message #28517 ] |
So, 08 Mai 2005 06:04 |
|
> Looks like this guy is proud he especially looked up some
> information about these TV science fiction series so that he
> could claim his response to me referred to one of the TV shows.
> Of course, this is not the Star Trek Deep Space Nine Newsgroup.
Actually, I didn't have to look that up, it really is my favorite episode.
And I'm not proud about it. I'm proud of the huge mole on my back, and I am
proud of my birthmark shaped like Texas, but it would be pretty silly of me
to be proud of knowing my favorite episode. And if you're upset about me
posting a reply about DS9 in the Star Trek newsgroup, then why do you keep
posting commits about DS9 in the very same newsgroup. You know, this is just
a suggestion, but maybe instead of posting this stuff in here you could in
fact, post it in the DS9 newsgroup. I think its a great idea. And from what
I hear, they love sodomy.
Now look, Johnny...can I call you Johnny? My comment wasn't to upset you or
hurt your feelings, but to point out to everyone else that, hey, this Johnny
guy is 'A-OK'. I just want you to know, one heterosexual to another, that
all of us in here love you. Not as a man loves a woman, but as a person
loves a sick child, or small dog.
--
Eric Nichols
Psalm 138:8
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexual Neo-Conservative Nexus Evidence [message #28520 ] |
So, 08 Mai 2005 06:38 |
|
"Eric Nichols" <sugarbearnichols [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:pdgfe.4544$Vz4.332 [at] newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
> > Looks like this guy is proud he especially looked up some
> > information about these TV science fiction series so that he
> > could claim his response to me referred to one of the TV shows.
> > Of course, this is not the Star Trek Deep Space Nine Newsgroup.
> Actually, I didn't have to look that up, it really is my favorite episode.
> And I'm not proud about it. I'm proud of the huge mole on my back, and I
am
> proud of my birthmark shaped like Texas, but it would be pretty silly of
me
> to be proud of knowing my favorite episode. And if you're upset about me
> posting a reply about DS9 in the Star Trek newsgroup, then why do you keep
> posting commits about DS9 in the very same newsgroup. You know, this is
just
> a suggestion, but maybe instead of posting this stuff in here you could in
> fact, post it in the DS9 newsgroup. I think its a great idea. And from
what
> I hear, they love sodomy.
And if you like science fiction TV, such people are killing your
favored form of entertainment by putting this Sodomy ball and chain
around the ratings of each series and ensuring these series die off
as they endeavor to sell Sodomy to you and your Son.
> Now look, Johnny...can I call you Johnny? My comment wasn't to upset you
or
> hurt your feelings, but to point out to everyone else that, hey, this
Johnny
> guy is 'A-OK'. I just want you to know, one heterosexual to another, that
> all of us in here love you. Not as a man loves a woman, but as a person
I was getting worried for a second.
> loves a sick child, or small dog.
> Eric Nichols
That is more along the lines of the hordes of paid Hollywood Homosexual
public relations workers on these Newsgroups.
Are you simply afraid to tell us what this episode was about ?
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexual Neo-Conservative Nexus Evidence [message #28521 ] |
So, 08 Mai 2005 06:47 |
|
> That is more along the lines of the hordes of paid Hollywood Homosexual
> public relations workers on these Newsgroups.
> Are you simply afraid to tell us what this episode was about ?
The epi was about Jake wanting to get a gift for his dad, a willie mays
baseball card. The card was bought by a wacko who was scared of the Soulless
Minions of Orthodoxy. In order to get the card the boys(Jake and Nog) had to
go on a scavenger hunt of sorts to find materials for the wacko and his
experiments. Its a great epi with a nice message at the end.
Its a really great epi especially when you take into account the darkness of
the next couple of seasons. Its also the best written 'light' epi of DS9.
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexual Neo-Conservative Nexus Evidence [message #28525 ] |
So, 08 Mai 2005 07:10 |
|
"Eric Nichols" <sugarbearnichols [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:URgfe.3414$1o3.2104 [at] newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
> > That is more along the lines of the hordes of paid Hollywood Homosexual
> > public relations workers on these Newsgroups.
> > Are you simply afraid to tell us what this episode was about ?
> The epi was about Jake wanting to get a gift for his dad, a willie mays
> baseball card. The card was bought by a wacko who was scared of the
Soulless
> Minions of Orthodoxy. In order to get the card the boys(Jake and Nog) had
to
> go on a scavenger hunt of sorts to find materials for the wacko and his
> experiments. Its a great epi with a nice message at the end.
> Its a really great epi especially when you take into account the darkness
of
> the next couple of seasons. Its also the best written 'light' epi of DS9.
Does not sound like it had much to do with science fiction, which was
the second main problem for Deep Space Nine, behind the rampant
Sodomy imagery in the storyline and scripts.
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexual Neo-Conservative Nexus Evidence [message #28526 ] |
So, 08 Mai 2005 07:41 |
|
> Does not sound like it had much to do with science fiction, which was
> the second main problem for Deep Space Nine, behind the rampant
> Sodomy imagery in the storyline and scripts.
The science fiction came in when you realized they were on a space station.
In Space. With aliens. And they had gizmos. And the gizmos did stuff. But
not gay stuff. Normal, straight, non-deviant gizmo stuff.
Besides, Johnny, while it is a matter of opinion whether or not the epi in
question had anything to do with scifi, it is a matter of fact that it had
to do with DS9, which is part of the StarTrek franchise, which means it
belongs in the StarTrek newsgroup.
Now look, I hate to burst your bubble, but I was in middle and high school
when DS9 was on originally, and never once did it leave me with any
homosexual desires of sodomy. I now work with troubled students of all ages,
and while some of them are confused, none of them trace that confusion back
to DS9 or BSG.
Tell me Johnny, do you ever watch TV for fun? There are some pretty good
programs out there. Why, even your much hated BSG has some fine points, well
written plot, nice effects, good actors and well portrayed characters, not
to mention Tricia Helfer, which as a heterosexual male should be enough to
make you stop posting for an hour or so. If you don't want to watch BSG,
there is always the weather channel, which is now, as I understand it, 96%
sodomy free(They do still forcast the weather for San Francisco).
Goodnight
--
Eric Nichols
Psalm 138:8
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexual Neo-Conservative Nexus Evidence [message #28536 ] |
So, 08 Mai 2005 10:41 |
|
"Eric Nichols" <sugarbearnichols [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:3Ehfe.3451$1o3.281 [at] newssvr12.news.prodigy.com...
> > Does not sound like it had much to do with science fiction, which was
> > the second main problem for Deep Space Nine, behind the rampant
> > Sodomy imagery in the storyline and scripts.
> The science fiction came in when you realized they were on a space
station.
> In Space. With aliens. And they had gizmos. And the gizmos did stuff. But
> not gay stuff. Normal, straight, non-deviant gizmo stuff.
Yeah, I heard they filmed Star Trek Deep Space Nine in a studio
that was made up to look like space ship or shopping mall, and
was populated with characters which had all kinds of makeup on
which made them look slightly non-human.
> Besides, Johnny, while it is a matter of opinion whether or not the epi in
> question had anything to do with scifi, it is a matter of fact that it had
> to do with DS9, which is part of the StarTrek franchise, which means it
> belongs in the StarTrek newsgroup.
Just because a show is part of the Star Trek series of series, does not
it involves primarily science fiction content.
As has been established, Sodomy was more on the mninds of DS9
creators than science fiction.
> Now look, I hate to burst your bubble, but I was in middle and high school
> when DS9 was on originally, and never once did it leave me with any
> homosexual desires of sodomy. I now work with troubled students of all
ages,
> and while some of them are confused, none of them trace that confusion
back
> to DS9 or BSG.
Maybe their strategy did not work on you but you never know
what effect it had on your subconscious. Homosexual scripts,
women who are really men transsexuality, etc. Heavy stuff for a kid.
> Tell me Johnny, do you ever watch TV for fun? There are some pretty good
That is my intent every time I try to watch TV. The problem is when
some Hollywood Homosexual wants to sell me some sick lifestyle
crap and is willing to corrupt the script to do it.
> programs out there. Why, even your much hated BSG has some fine points,
What hated ?
> well written plot, nice effects, good actors and well portrayed
characters, not
I have pointed out several scriptwriting errors which have nothing to do
with Sodomy.
> to mention Tricia Helfer, which as a heterosexual male should be enough to
> make you stop posting for an hour or so. If you don't want to watch BSG,
> there is always the weather channel, which is now, as I understand it, 96%
> sodomy free(They do still forecast the weather for San Francisco).
> Goodnight
> Eric Nichols
> Psalm 138:8
If I do not watch BSG, the chances are that 100,000's of other people
will refuse to watch it either. That means bad ratings and that means
cancellation of yet another science fiction show.
Politics
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Sa Mai 26 10:54:33 CEST 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,03388 Sekunden |