| Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #27564] |
Di, 03 Mai 2005 20:56 |
|
All the excitement of coming home from work with two big empty tubs of
nothing caused the household to universally forget to press
Play+Record on the cassette recorder. Missed the whole darned 1st
episode on the Radio this evening.
Anyone know when the repeat is on?
Lloyd
--
"In fact, everything between 'herring' and 'marmalade'
appears to be missing" -- Svlad Cjelli
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #27570 ] |
Di, 03 Mai 2005 21:36 |
|
On 3 May 2005 12:08:40 -0700, "scojo the moo"
<binarycode [at] onetel.net.uk> wrote:
>No repeat this week due to the UK General Election. You have to go to
>the Radio 4 site and listen to the 'Listen Again' broadcast.
AAaaaaahhh!!!!!
Bugger.
I have not the "Listen Again" capability.
Can anyone precis it for me, so that I may be in readiness for next
week's?
Lloyd
--
"In fact, everything between 'herring' and 'marmalade'
appears to be missing" -- Svlad Cjelli
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #29272 ] |
Mi, 04 Mai 2005 15:41 |
|
Hey Lloyd
I took the liberty of saving episode 1 to MP3.
I can send that to you if that's any good!
Huggy
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #29278 ] |
Mi, 04 Mai 2005 16:52 |
|
I don't suppose I could get a copy of that as well?
reipost [at] yahoo.com
I've been trying to listen to it from the website, but it keeps having
network problems.
Stupid internet connection..
Thanks!
On 4 May 2005 06:41:51 -0700, "HuggyHare" <huggyhare [at] hotmail.com>
wrote:
>Hey Lloyd
>
>I took the liberty of saving episode 1 to MP3.
>
>I can send that to you if that's any good!
>
>Huggy
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #29297 ] |
Mi, 04 Mai 2005 21:17 |
|
On 4 May 2005 06:41:51 -0700, "HuggyHare" <huggyhare [at] hotmail.com>
wrote:
>Hey Lloyd
>
>I took the liberty of saving episode 1 to MP3.
>
>I can send that to you if that's any good!
>
>Huggy
That's very kind of you, but unfortunately I don't have the kind of
bandwidth that readily enables the sort of download size that 30mins
of MP3 would entail.
Nice of you to offer, though. Tea?
Lloyd
--
"In fact, everything between 'herring' and 'marmalade'
appears to be missing" -- Svlad Cjelli
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #29299 ] |
Mi, 04 Mai 2005 21:26 |
|
EVERYONE can have a copy!
Write off-list to huggy [at] huggyhare.com
Can't have anyone missing out now can we!
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #29302 ] |
Mi, 04 Mai 2005 21:30 |
|
Ah google! hiding my e-addy!
"h..." = huggy!
like what's the big deal?
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #29321 ] |
Do, 05 Mai 2005 01:00 |
|
OK, I've tried sending the MP3 but it keeps coming back at it's too
big.
Instead, try this link http://www.huggyhare.com/HHGTTG-14.mp3
That should work!
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #29342 ] |
Do, 05 Mai 2005 04:08 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #29352 ] |
Do, 05 Mai 2005 10:11 |
|
How big is the mp3? I mean, I'm sure nerds like us will be putting it
up on the gnutella network soon enough but I want to hear it again and
save it away as each ep comes out :)
Nancy.
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #29354 ] |
Do, 05 Mai 2005 10:52 |
|
37 megabites. Rather large I know. May be a problem for
non-broadbeaners!
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #29424 ] |
Fr, 06 Mai 2005 01:20 |
|
Lloyd Gilbert <afda [at] zanoop.org.uk.invalid> wrote:
> >No repeat this week due to the UK General Election. You have to go to
> >the Radio 4 site and listen to the 'Listen Again' broadcast.
>
> AAaaaaahhh!!!!!
>
> Bugger.
>
> I have not the "Listen Again" capability.
Buy the cd. (when it comes out)
--
Martin Koolhoven
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #29425 ] |
Fr, 06 Mai 2005 01:20 |
|
Huggy Hare <huggy [at] huggyhare.com> wrote:
> 37 megabites. Rather large I know. May be a problem for
> non-broadbeaners!
On your site its 12K, isn't it?
--
Martin Koolhoven
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #29514 ] |
Fr, 06 Mai 2005 23:30 |
|
On Thu, 05 May 2005 23:20:00 GMT, MYNAME [at] xs4all.nlSPAMSHIT (Martin
Koolhoven) wrote:
>Lloyd Gilbert <afda [at] zanoop.org.uk.invalid> wrote:
>
>> >No repeat this week due to the UK General Election. You have to go to
>> >the Radio 4 site and listen to the 'Listen Again' broadcast.
>>
>> AAaaaaahhh!!!!!
>>
>> Bugger.
>>
>> I have not the "Listen Again" capability.
>
>Buy the cd. (when it comes out)
Oh, I will. No doubt of that. Though knowing me I'll probably buy it
as a present for someone in another hemisphere from me and never
manage to listen to it before posting it around the globe[3].
But the thing about the 1st episode of the 4th wossname is that the
2nd episode is still yet to be aired and I've a chance to
record'n'hear that in the near future.
BUT: All is well with the world. Thanks to the astonishing generosity
of several froupies I'm now the likely recipient of multiple copies
through the post of the episode I missed earlier this week.
You guys rock!
Lloyd
[3] This is what happened with the Tertiary Phase
--
"In fact, everything between 'herring' and 'marmalade'
appears to be missing" -- Svlad Cjelli
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #29556 ] |
Sa, 07 Mai 2005 06:21 |
|
Oh, is it?
It must be condensed or something.
Never could get the hang of 'puters!
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #29608 ] |
Sa, 07 Mai 2005 17:13 |
|
Huggy Hare wrote:
> OK, I've tried sending the MP3 but it keeps coming back at it's too
> big.
>
> Instead, try this link http://www.huggyhare.com/HHGTTG-14.mp3
>
> That should work!
>
Thanks Huggy....Muchly appreciated :-)
--
www.fixaphoto.co.uk
for photographic restorations
|
|
|
| Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #29832 ] |
Mo, 09 Mai 2005 01:02 |
|
Hi Huggy,
Thanks for putting up the Fit!
I couldn't record it as we're in ireland and can't get Radio 4 on
anything other than ntl and that RealPlayer stream from the Radio 4
site is slightly worse than terrible!!
Don't surpose you'd be kind enough to put the other's on line after
they are transmitted would you?
You are a scholar and I thank you for putting this Fit up :-)
Cheers
|
|
|
| Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #34043 ] |
Fr, 13 Mai 2005 05:05 |
|
> http://www.huggyhare.com/HHGTTG-14.mp3
is the second episode alraedy there?
--
Martin Koolhoven
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35767 ] |
So, 15 Mai 2005 15:50 |
|
OK OK!
The second episode is now up!
http://www.huggyhare.com/HHGTTG-20.mp3
I couldn't leave the 1st one on as I only have room for one!
This one will be on for about a week til the next one gets broadcast.
Share and Enjoy!
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35768 ] |
So, 15 Mai 2005 17:21 |
|
Hi,
In article <1116165058.596653.294190 [at] o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com>,
Huggy Hare<huggy [at] huggyhare.com> wrote:
> http://www.huggyhare.com/HHGTTG-20.mp3
Umm...the last two I've got have been -14 and -15...why the big jump?
Andy
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35769 ] |
So, 15 Mai 2005 18:19 |
|
Actually a boo boo on my part. There is no jump. The 1st episode was
Fit the 19th and NOT the 14th as for some reason I believed. That's
what it says here anyway...
Huggy
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35771 ] |
So, 15 Mai 2005 18:29 |
|
Hi,
In article <1116173963.926495.81520 [at] g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Huggy Hare<huggy [at] huggyhare.com> wrote:
> Actually a boo boo on my part. There is no jump. The 1st episode was
> Fit the 19th and NOT the 14th as for some reason I believed. That's
> what it says here anyway...
Ok, so the one I downloaded that was called -15, what was that? It's a
different size to the one I've just downloaded called -20...
Andy
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35787 ] |
So, 15 Mai 2005 21:07 |
|
"Huggy Hare" <huggy [at] huggyhare.com> wrote in message
news:1116165058.596653.294190 [at] o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>
> The second episode is now up!
>
> http://www.huggyhare.com/HHGTTG-20.mp3
>
Thanks!
Chiggy.
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35789 ] |
So, 15 Mai 2005 21:24 |
|
"Huggy Hare" <huggy [at] huggyhare.com> wrote in message
news:1116165058.596653.294190 [at] o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> OK OK!
>
> The second episode is now up!
>
> http://www.huggyhare.com/HHGTTG-20.mp3
>
The last half of the program seems to be missing. Is it just me?
Chiggy.
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35792 ] |
So, 15 Mai 2005 22:51 |
|
Hi,
In article <TrOdnVSnqZtqPBrfRVn-pA [at] comcast.com>,
Dave Adalian<dpalta [at] comcast.net> wrote:
> The last half of the program seems to be missing. Is it just me?
That could be why the download of -20 is smaller than that for -15...
Andy
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35811 ] |
Mo, 16 Mai 2005 06:57 |
|
Really Really sorry. My fault. I used an old audio converter which only
did 75% of the audio.
It's now sorted, no really, I've just checked!
The link again http://www.huggyhare.com/HHGTT=ADG-20.mp3
And the cloakroom is...?
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35817 ] |
Mo, 16 Mai 2005 10:30 |
|
Hi,
In article <1116219434.187160.94030 [at] g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Huggy Hare<huggy [at] huggyhare.com> wrote:
> The link again http://www.huggyhare.com/HHGTTG-20.mp3
ITYM
http://www.huggyhare.com/HHGTTG-20.mp3
:)
Thanks though!
Andy
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35821 ] |
Mo, 16 Mai 2005 12:56 |
|
Huggy Hare wrote:
> OK OK!
>
> The second episode is now up!
>
> http://www.huggyhare.com/HHGTTG-20.mp3
>
> I couldn't leave the 1st one on as I only have room for one!
>
> This one will be on for about a week til the next one gets broadcast.
>
> Share and Enjoy!
>
LOL...It's like you're running a mirror server for the BBC's listen
again service....
Can I ask, what software are you using to capture and clean the audio?....
--
www.fixaphoto.co.uk
for photographic restorations
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35823 ] |
Mo, 16 Mai 2005 14:10 |
|
I use a thing called "Audio Recorder Pro" to record the sound and
NOTHING AT ALL to clean it with. Probably not the best device out there
but it works for me.
Also had to purchase "Audio Splitter & Joiner" and "Audio Converter".
All in all about $60. I'm a Brit living in England and I can't work out
how many squid that is!
Worth the money though as I use it alot.
Here's the link to it - http://www.ezaudiorecorder.com/
Talking of the BBC, why don't they save their stuff as MP3s? Seems I'm
not the only one having trouble with their Real Player!
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35826 ] |
Mo, 16 Mai 2005 14:28 |
|
Huggy Hare wrote:
> I use a thing called "Audio Recorder Pro" to record the sound and
> NOTHING AT ALL to clean it with. Probably not the best device out there
> but it works for me.
I use a package called Magix Audio Cleaning Lab....I got it for £10 on
one of those *everything for a tenner* software racks that you see in
bargain bookshops and PC world....
I play guitar and tend to do a bit of recording on an old tape 4-track,
so it's perfect for mastering and enhancing the audio quality....
> Here's the link to it - http://www.ezaudiorecorder.com/
Looks like a nice straight-forward piece of software....Simple is good....
The one I use is on this page (can't get the link to work right cos the
bloody site is a frameset)
http://site.magix.net/index.php?334
I use an older version of it, from about 3 or 4 years ago....I'm
seriously tempted to upgrade....
> Talking of the BBC, why don't they save their stuff as MP3s? Seems I'm
> not the only one having trouble with their Real Player!
>
LOL, probably because it's harder to download a real-stream to your HDD
than it is an MP3....
--
www.fixaphoto.co.uk
for photographic restorations
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35827 ] |
Mo, 16 Mai 2005 14:40 |
|
Huggy Hare wrote:
> I use a thing called "Audio Recorder Pro" to record the sound and
> NOTHING AT ALL to clean it with. Probably not the best device out there
> but it works for me.
>
> Also had to purchase "Audio Splitter & Joiner" and "Audio Converter".
>
> All in all about $60. I'm a Brit living in England and I can't work out
> how many squid that is!
> Worth the money though as I use it alot.
>
> Here's the link to it - http://www.ezaudiorecorder.com/
>
> Talking of the BBC, why don't they save their stuff as MP3s? Seems I'm
> not the only one having trouble with their Real Player!
Well, that's easy to answer: Because mp3 can be downloaded, played, and
sistributed as often as you wish. In theory, the windows media and
realplayer streams can only be played from online.
That is only in theory, of course. Anything you play on your computer
_can_ be recorded. For instance, Audio Recorder Pro simply copies
everything played by the sound card to an audio stream, which can then
be saved to mp3.
In an attempt to stop this, laws are passed making it illegal to decode
encrypted streams (like realplayer and windows media) for any purpose
other than listening to it. These laws make it illegal to use Audio
Recorder Pro on such streams.
In other words: BBC try to make their "Listen Again" features available
for a limited time only. If they made their listen again using mp3, they
would be available forever.
Of course, they are still available forever but only to people who
1) are techie enough to record the stream
2) know someone who is, or
3) get the stream from general filesharing
(like usenet binaries, eDonkey, bittorrent, etc., KaZaa)
but the BBC apparently finds this an acceptable loss.
Best
Kåre
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35830 ] |
Mo, 16 Mai 2005 16:14 |
|
Kaare Fiedler Christiansen wrote:
> Huggy Hare wrote:
>
>> I use a thing called "Audio Recorder Pro" to record the sound and
>> NOTHING AT ALL to clean it with. Probably not the best device out there
>> but it works for me.
>>
>> Also had to purchase "Audio Splitter & Joiner" and "Audio Converter".
>>
>> All in all about $60. I'm a Brit living in England and I can't work out
>> how many squid that is!
>> Worth the money though as I use it alot.
>>
>> Here's the link to it - http://www.ezaudiorecorder.com/
>>
>> Talking of the BBC, why don't they save their stuff as MP3s? Seems I'm
>> not the only one having trouble with their Real Player!
>
>
> Well, that's easy to answer: Because mp3 can be downloaded, played, and
> sistributed as often as you wish. In theory, the windows media and
> realplayer streams can only be played from online.
>
> That is only in theory, of course. Anything you play on your computer
> _can_ be recorded. For instance, Audio Recorder Pro simply copies
> everything played by the sound card to an audio stream, which can then
> be saved to mp3.
>
> In an attempt to stop this, laws are passed making it illegal to decode
> encrypted streams (like realplayer and windows media) for any purpose
> other than listening to it. These laws make it illegal to use Audio
> Recorder Pro on such streams.
>
> In other words: BBC try to make their "Listen Again" features available
> for a limited time only. If they made their listen again using mp3, they
> would be available forever.
>
> Of course, they are still available forever but only to people who
> 1) are techie enough to record the stream
> 2) know someone who is, or
> 3) get the stream from general filesharing
> (like usenet binaries, eDonkey, bittorrent, etc., KaZaa)
> but the BBC apparently finds this an acceptable loss.
I often wonder, do they find it an acceptable loss, or do they simply
deem the cost of combatting it too high when compared against the loss?....
I wonder if thats the reason why they've started taking steps to make
their entire archive available to anyone with a valid TV license? (as
discussed in another thread)....So that they at least have some sort of
control over the material, even if it's only control over it's Download
sources?...
Actually, thinking about it, have I just defined the meaning of
'acceptable loss'?....
Have I just argued the same two points against each other?....Like saying
"Which colour do you prefer? Orange, or a Yellowish/Red suffusion?"
I'm rambling senselessly now....
I think my brain needs caffienne....
--
www.fixaphoto.co.uk
for photographic restorations
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35831 ] |
Mo, 16 Mai 2005 16:19 |
|
"Fat Sam" <janetandsam [at] beeteeinternet.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3ero7bF49pmsU1 [at] individual.net...
> Have I just argued the same two points against each other?....Like saying
> "Which colour do you prefer? Orange, or a Yellowish/Red suffusion?"
4 :)
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35838 ] |
Mo, 16 Mai 2005 16:58 |
|
Neil Gerace wrote:
> "Fat Sam" <janetandsam [at] beeteeinternet.co.uk> wrote in message
> news:3ero7bF49pmsU1 [at] individual.net...
>
>>Have I just argued the same two points against each other?....Like saying
>>"Which colour do you prefer? Orange, or a Yellowish/Red suffusion?"
>
>
> 4 :)
* 10 + 2 :-)
Best
Kåre
|
|
|
| Re: Huggy Re: Missed it! (first ep of new radio series) [message #35876 ] |
Di, 17 Mai 2005 00:24 |
|
Kaare Fiedler Christiansen <news [at] kaarefc.dk> hit the keyboard.
Afterwards the following was on the screen:
> Huggy Hare wrote:
>> I use a thing called "Audio Recorder Pro" to record the sound and
>> NOTHING AT ALL to clean it with. Probably not the best device out there
>> but it works for me.
>> Also had to purchase "Audio Splitter & Joiner" and "Audio Converter".
>> All in all about $60. I'm a Brit living in England and I can't work
>> out
>> how many squid that is!
>> Worth the money though as I use it alot.
>> Here's the link to it - http://www.ezaudiorecorder.com/
>> Talking of the BBC, why don't they save their stuff as MP3s? Seems
>> I'm
>> not the only one having trouble with their Real Player!
>
> Well, that's easy to answer: Because mp3 can be downloaded, played,
> and sistributed as often as you wish. In theory, the windows media and
> realplayer streams can only be played from online.
Mp3 might be distributed as a streaming service too (shoutcast
eg.). However it is a simple task to save the stream as there are so
many tools for handling mp3 out there. The same thing might be said
about Ogg Vorbis.
Real and Windows Media are supposedly closed formats and therefore
must be played with the official players. However other programs might
be able to decode the streams and save them to disk.
> Of course, they are still available forever but only to people who
> 1) are techie enough to record the stream
> 2) know someone who is, or
> 3) get the stream from general filesharing
> (like usenet binaries, eDonkey, bittorrent, etc., KaZaa)
> but the BBC apparently finds this an acceptable loss.
Probably that is due to the facts you mentioned above: They cannot
really do anything about it. They can make it as hard to work around
as possible - but not really make it impossible.
/Rasmus
--
-- [ Rasmus "Møffe" Bøg Hansen ] ---------------------------------------
Sleep is a poor substitue for enough caffeine.
----------------------------------------------[ moffe at zz9 dot dk ] --
|
|
|
