|
Sprinkler Systems
Uhaul move
Lawn care
Roses and trees
Ford Parts
Chrysler Parts
Lake Powell
New IPod Touch Apps
New IPhone Apps
IPhone Apps
IPad Information
IPad Apps
Android APPS
Android Games APPS
Android Systems
Android Tablets APPS and Beyond
Smartphone Apps
Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools
Tablet PC
Car Sharing Car Leasing
Tabler Pc
Fly Fishing
Toyota Cars
Vacation Rentals
Stock market
NYSE
SSE Stock
Freight & Shipping News
Gluten
Lactose
Gout
My Coupon Life
Campgrounds Check
Outdoor
Kitchen Design and Redoo
Bath Remodeling
Palm Springs
Las Vegas Vacation Tipps
Lake Powell Boating
Homes for lease
Electric and green Car Blog
Pearls and diamonds
Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App
Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
|
Fantasy » alt.fan.harry-potter » Harry Potter likely to die in book 7
| Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297688] |
Fr, 07 Juli 2006 10:25 |
|
As J.K. Rowling lately stated there will be the deaths of two main
characters to mourn about in book seven.
It is likely that one of these will be Harry Potter with the odds in favour
of Vol..., äh, you-know-who, to be his murderer.
The appearance of book seven is still unknown, but if you would like to read
some other great Potter-Storys with an alternate, more "Hollywood"-ending
you can take a peek here:
http://www.students.uni-mainz.de/sprec000/Ablage/Liesmich.ht ml
( be sure to check out the picture of the printed fanfiction right on to of
the webpage... )
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297701 ] |
Fr, 07 Juli 2006 19:20 |
|
Chris wrote:
> As J.K. Rowling lately stated there will be the deaths of two main
> characters to mourn about in book seven.
> It is likely that one of these will be Harry Potter with the odds in favo=
ur
> of Vol..., =E4h, you-know-who, to be his murderer.
>
> The appearance of book seven is still unknown, but if you would like to r=
ead
> some other great Potter-Storys with an alternate, more "Hollywood"-ending
> you can take a peek here:
> http://www.students.uni-mainz.de/sprec000/Ablage/Liesmich.ht ml
>
> ( be sure to check out the picture of the printed fanfiction right on to =
of
> the webpage... )
Re-read what she said. She said two characters that she didn't intend
to kill are now going to die, and one character who was going to be
killed will get a reprieve. She didn't say ONLY two characters will
die. She is very careful on how she words things. Considering this
information, I wouldn't be surprised if the book were completed this
autumn.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297708 ] |
Fr, 07 Juli 2006 21:09 |
|
Chris [mtfbwy [at] gmx.de] said
> As J.K. Rowling lately stated there will be the deaths of two main
> characters to mourn about in book seven.
<chuckle>
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297710 ] |
Fr, 07 Juli 2006 21:32 |
|
<tbarry22 [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1152292805.023067.175110 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
Chris wrote:
> As J.K. Rowling lately stated there will be the deaths of two main
> characters to mourn about in book seven.
> It is likely that one of these will be Harry Potter with the odds in
> favour
> of Vol..., äh, you-know-who, to be his murderer.
>
> The appearance of book seven is still unknown, but if you would like to
> read
> some other great Potter-Storys with an alternate, more "Hollywood"-ending
> you can take a peek here:
> http://www.students.uni-mainz.de/sprec000/Ablage/Liesmich.ht ml
>
> ( be sure to check out the picture of the printed fanfiction right on to
> of
> the webpage... )
Re-read what she said. She said two characters that she didn't intend
to kill are now going to die, and one character who was going to be
killed will get a reprieve. She didn't say ONLY two characters will
die. She is very careful on how she words things. Considering this
information, I wouldn't be surprised if the book were completed this
autumn.
Thank you, now I'm not the only one who thinks it's not far off!! Watch out
though, you may get jumped on for making assumptions like this!! LOL
Snake Lady
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297714 ] |
Fr, 07 Juli 2006 23:32 |
|
"Snake Lady" <samandjanetknox [at] tessco.net> wrote in message
news:BFyrg.8039$wR4.2194 [at] newsfe1-gui.ntli.net...
>
> <tbarry22 [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1152292805.023067.175110 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> Chris wrote:
>> As J.K. Rowling lately stated there will be the deaths of two main
>> characters to mourn about in book seven.
>> It is likely that one of these will be Harry Potter with the odds in
>> favour
>> of Vol..., äh, you-know-who, to be his murderer.
>>
>> The appearance of book seven is still unknown, but if you would like to
>> read
>> some other great Potter-Storys with an alternate, more "Hollywood"-ending
>> you can take a peek here:
>> http://www.students.uni-mainz.de/sprec000/Ablage/Liesmich.ht ml
>>
>> ( be sure to check out the picture of the printed fanfiction right on to
>> of
>> the webpage... )
>
> Re-read what she said. She said two characters that she didn't intend
> to kill are now going to die, and one character who was going to be
> killed will get a reprieve. She didn't say ONLY two characters will
> die. She is very careful on how she words things. Considering this
> information, I wouldn't be surprised if the book were completed this
> autumn.
>
> Thank you, now I'm not the only one who thinks it's not far off!! Watch
> out though, you may get jumped on for making assumptions like this!! LOL
>
> Snake Lady
>
>
How does *killing a couple extra characters* translate into *book ready this
fall*?? There would have been announcements of publishing dates and release
dates if it were going to be ready that soon. It just ain't gonna happen
that freaking soon.
I am not jumping, just stating the rather very obvious. These books are
always announced way ahead of time to build the anticipation... MONTHS ahead
of time.
M_m
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297715 ] |
Fr, 07 Juli 2006 23:35 |
|
"Magic_Mom" <nofreakinway [at] yeahright.com> wrote in message
news:e8mjje$vi7$1 [at] nntp.aioe.org...
>
> "Snake Lady" <samandjanetknox [at] tessco.net> wrote in message
> news:BFyrg.8039$wR4.2194 [at] newsfe1-gui.ntli.net...
>>
>> <tbarry22 [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:1152292805.023067.175110 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Chris wrote:
>>> As J.K. Rowling lately stated there will be the deaths of two main
>>> characters to mourn about in book seven.
>>> It is likely that one of these will be Harry Potter with the odds in
>>> favour
>>> of Vol..., äh, you-know-who, to be his murderer.
>>>
>>> The appearance of book seven is still unknown, but if you would like to
>>> read
>>> some other great Potter-Storys with an alternate, more
>>> "Hollywood"-ending
>>> you can take a peek here:
>>> http://www.students.uni-mainz.de/sprec000/Ablage/Liesmich.ht ml
>>>
>>> ( be sure to check out the picture of the printed fanfiction right on to
>>> of
>>> the webpage... )
>>
>> Re-read what she said. She said two characters that she didn't intend
>> to kill are now going to die, and one character who was going to be
>> killed will get a reprieve. She didn't say ONLY two characters will
>> die. She is very careful on how she words things. Considering this
>> information, I wouldn't be surprised if the book were completed this
>> autumn.
>>
>> Thank you, now I'm not the only one who thinks it's not far off!! Watch
>> out though, you may get jumped on for making assumptions like this!! LOL
>>
>> Snake Lady
>>
>>
>
> How does *killing a couple extra characters* translate into *book ready
> this fall*?? There would have been announcements of publishing dates and
> release dates if it were going to be ready that soon. It just ain't gonna
> happen that freaking soon.
> I am not jumping, just stating the rather very obvious. These books are
> always announced way ahead of time to build the anticipation... MONTHS
> ahead of time.
> M_m
>
See I told you it would happen, LOL.
Snake Lady
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297719 ] |
Sa, 08 Juli 2006 02:43 |
|
In message <news:e8mjje$vi7$1 [at] nntp.aioe.org> "Magic_Mom"
<nofreakinway [at] yeahright.com> enriched us with:
>
<snip>
> How does *killing a couple extra characters* translate into *book
> ready this fall*??
I was considering to write something sarcastic to ridicule the idea in
smugly underplayed way, but decided against it (actually I deleted it).
The idea, I suspect, would be that 'since she knows who dies and who
lives, she must be nearly done', even if that is not true. The
statement that Rowling is careful about what she says is, I'm afraid,
not really true either, even if she often does take care to remain
silent when she would rather not reveal too much ('often' is important
-- revealing the title of OotP prematurely was a slip).
> There would have been announcements of publishing dates and release
> dates if it were going to be ready that soon.
The history shows:
Book Announced Release Forewarning
GoF, rel < Jan 1 2000 8 Jul, 2000 > 6 months
OotP, title Oct 2000 21 Jun, 2003 ~ 31 months
OotP, rel 15 Jan, 2003 21 Jun, 2003 ~ 5 months
HBP, title 28 Jun, 2004 16 Jul, 2005 > 12 months
HBP, rel. 21 Dec, 2004 16 Jul, 2005 ~ 7 months
There are other signs that I have left out from this (such as the
progress-statements of the "it's progressing well" kind about half a
year before the announcement), but in general we've got about six
months of advance notice of the release date, allowing, as you note,
the anticipation (some would naturally call it the hype) to build up,
ensuring yet another record-setting advance sale.
Furthermore all the books have been released in June or July (6 June to
16 July), and it is a reasonable supposition that the last book will
also be released during these two months.
> It just ain't gonna happen that freaking soon.
No, it is not. The last book will /not/ be released in 2006, and if it
is to make a summer 2007 release, it is about time that we are told the
title.
> I am not jumping, just stating the rather very obvious.
You should know by now that shooting down people's pet ideas by
referring to experience, cool overview, facts, logic and common sense
will, regardless of the intentions, at times be seen as jumping . . .
The whole printing process[1] means that it takes half a year from Jo
hands in the manuscript until the book can be bought, but from the day
she does hand in the manuscript (or a day or two later, when they've
counted the characters/words/pages) they can fairly quickly set a
release date, which will be published immediately -- there are strong
financial interests forcing the information to be announced ASAP. If
book six was to be released in 2006, we would with absolute certainty
have known by now (they're not, I believe, going to make a December
release missing the Christmas shopping in November).
[1] <http://www.hp-lexicon.org/library/ref/Printing_process.html>
(fortunately it seems to be still on-line)
--
Troels Forchhammer
Valid e-mail is <t.forch(a)email.dk>
One who cannot cast away a treasure at need is in fetters.
- Aragorn "Strider", /Two Towers/ (J.R.R. Tolkien)
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297724 ] |
Sa, 08 Juli 2006 03:36 |
|
"Troels Forchhammer" <Troels [at] ThisIsFake.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns97FA1B95F2FAET.Forch [at] 130.133.1.4...
> In message <news:e8mjje$vi7$1 [at] nntp.aioe.org> "Magic_Mom"
> <nofreakinway [at] yeahright.com> enriched us with:
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>> How does *killing a couple extra characters* translate into *book
>> ready this fall*??
>
> No, it is not. The last book will /not/ be released in 2006, and if it
> is to make a summer 2007 release, it is about time that we are told the
> title.
>
>> I am not jumping, just stating the rather very obvious.
>
> You should know by now that shooting down people's pet ideas by
> referring to experience, cool overview, facts, logic and common sense
> will, regardless of the intentions, at times be seen as jumping . . .
>
> The whole printing process[1] means that it takes half a year from Jo
> hands in the manuscript until the book can be bought, but from the day
> she does hand in the manuscript (or a day or two later, when they've
> counted the characters/words/pages) they can fairly quickly set a
> release date, which will be published immediately -- there are strong
> financial interests forcing the information to be announced ASAP. If
> book six was to be released in 2006, we would with absolute certainty
> have known by now (they're not, I believe, going to make a December
> release missing the Christmas shopping in November).
>
> [1] <http://www.hp-lexicon.org/library/ref/Printing_process.html>
> (fortunately it seems to be still on-line)
>
> --
> Troels Forchhammer
> Valid e-mail is <t.forch(a)email.dk>
>
> One who cannot cast away a treasure at need is in fetters.
> - Aragorn "Strider", /Two Towers/ (J.R.R. Tolkien)
And now I am waiting to see how long it takes for the snippet from CNN,
posted on Mugglenet today, about how SCHOLASTIC would like a 2007 release
date, to end up here as someone swearing that is gospel truth for a
confirmed release period.
M_m
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297735 ] |
Sa, 08 Juli 2006 09:41 |
|
On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 19:36:56 -0600, "Magic_Mom"
<nofreakinway [at] yeahright.com> wrote:
>
>And now I am waiting to see how long it takes for the snippet from CNN,
>posted on Mugglenet today, about how SCHOLASTIC would like a 2007 release
>date, to end up here as someone swearing that is gospel truth for a
>confirmed release period.
>
>M_m
>
OK, I'll do it.
DUH, CNN said Scholastic said there'd be a 2007 release date, and JK
Rowling will bend over backwards and jump through hoops to make their
decreed deadline.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297764 ] |
Sa, 08 Juli 2006 17:45 |
|
Toon wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2006 19:36:56 -0600, "Magic_Mom"
> <nofreakinway [at] yeahright.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >And now I am waiting to see how long it takes for the snippet from CNN,
> >posted on Mugglenet today, about how SCHOLASTIC would like a 2007 release
> >date, to end up here as someone swearing that is gospel truth for a
> >confirmed release period.
> >
> >M_m
> >
>
>
> OK, I'll do it.
>
> DUH, CNN said Scholastic said there'd be a 2007 release date, and JK
> Rowling will bend over backwards and jump through hoops to make their
> decreed deadline.
Toon, you really are funny! Actually, Liz Calder, the publishing
director of Bloomsbury, did an interview in May and said, "The next
Harry Potter book is likely to come out in 2007".
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297772 ] |
Sa, 08 Juli 2006 21:43 |
|
In message <news:e8n1uh$ngl$1 [at] nntp.aioe.org> "Magic_Mom"
<nofreakinway [at] yeahright.com> enriched us with:
>
<snip>
> And now I am waiting to see how long it takes for the snippet from
> CNN, posted on Mugglenet today, about how SCHOLASTIC would like a
> 2007 release date, to end up here as someone swearing that is
> gospel truth for a confirmed release period.
Well, I am sure that they would have liked a 2002 or 2001 release date
for OotP, but they didn't get that either ;-)
But Rowling said last year that she thought it would "be at least
another two year wait" (the cub reporters), and that would make it
summer 2007 at the earliest.
On the other hand, I think the prognosis for a summer 2007 release is
good at the moment (we're getting some 'things are going fine' reports
from Jo), but I'd really like for the title to be out within the next
couple of months (I wouldn't be surprised to see it out a little later
than last time -- about 9 - 10 months before the release (and therefore
some 2 - 4 months before the announcement of the release date).
--
Troels Forchhammer
Valid e-mail is <t.forch(a)email.dk>
"He deserves death."
"Deserves it! I daresay he does. Many that live deserve
death. And some that die deserve life. Can you give it to
them? Then do not be too eager to deal out death in
judgement. For even the very wise cannot see all ends."
- Frodo and Gandalf, /The Fellowship of the Ring/ (J.R.R. Tolkien)
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297779 ] |
Sa, 08 Juli 2006 22:37 |
|
"Troels Forchhammer" <Troels [at] ThisIsFake.invalid> wrote in message
news:Xns97FADCE6A8C12T.Forch [at] 130.133.1.4...
> In message <news:e8n1uh$ngl$1 [at] nntp.aioe.org> "Magic_Mom"
> <nofreakinway [at] yeahright.com> enriched us with:
>>
>
> <snip>
>
>> And now I am waiting to see how long it takes for the snippet from
>> CNN, posted on Mugglenet today, about how SCHOLASTIC would like a
>> 2007 release date, to end up here as someone swearing that is
>> gospel truth for a confirmed release period.
>
> Well, I am sure that they would have liked a 2002 or 2001 release date
> for OotP, but they didn't get that either ;-)
>
> But Rowling said last year that she thought it would "be at least
> another two year wait" (the cub reporters), and that would make it
> summer 2007 at the earliest.
>
> On the other hand, I think the prognosis for a summer 2007 release is
> good at the moment (we're getting some 'things are going fine' reports
> from Jo), but I'd really like for the title to be out within the next
> couple of months (I wouldn't be surprised to see it out a little later
> than last time -- about 9 - 10 months before the release (and therefore
> some 2 - 4 months before the announcement of the release date).
I've always heard that it is going to be 7/7/07, right in time for my
b-day. I thought she picked the date to be symbolic (not so much
as 'lucky' as 'seventh son of seventh son of seventh son', or something
like that.. )
But, time will tell, won't it? She controls the pen.
> --
> Troels Forchhammer
> Valid e-mail is <t.forch(a)email.dk>
Troels, has anyone wished you a 'welcome back' yet? If not, I'm doing
so now... then again, I could be late to this party, for I have had other
issues to take care of as well...
TME
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297784 ] |
So, 09 Juli 2006 01:39 |
|
The Magic Engineer wrote:
> I've always heard that it is going to be 7/7/07, right in time for my
> b-day.
I've heard that a lot, too. But never ever from a source genuinely
linked to J. K. Rowling. On this newgroup, it went from, "Maybe it will
be 7/7/07, wouldn't that be cool?" to, "I heard it was planned for
7/7/07" to, now, "Rowling said it would come out on 7/7/07."
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297785 ] |
So, 09 Juli 2006 02:46 |
|
Kish wrote:
> The Magic Engineer wrote:
>
> > I've always heard that it is going to be 7/7/07, right in time for my
> > b-day.
>
> I've heard that a lot, too. But never ever from a source genuinely
> linked to J. K. Rowling. On this newgroup, it went from, "Maybe it will
> be 7/7/07, wouldn't that be cool?" to, "I heard it was planned for
> 7/7/07" to, now, "Rowling said it would come out on 7/7/07."
You're right Kish. The only place I've ever seen it mentioned
"unofficially" was on hpana.com because someone wrote an
essay/commentary in Dec.'05 saying that 7/07/07 would be a cool date to
release the book. There's been absolutely nothing official anywhere
that would indicate that date at all.
Cassie
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297786 ] |
So, 09 Juli 2006 03:05 |
|
wadkin2000 [at] yahoo.com escribió:
> Kish wrote:
>> The Magic Engineer wrote:
>>
>>> I've always heard that it is going to be 7/7/07, right in time for my
>>> b-day.
>> I've heard that a lot, too. But never ever from a source genuinely
>> linked to J. K. Rowling. On this newgroup, it went from, "Maybe it will
>> be 7/7/07, wouldn't that be cool?" to, "I heard it was planned for
>> 7/7/07" to, now, "Rowling said it would come out on 7/7/07."
>
>
> You're right Kish. The only place I've ever seen it mentioned
> "unofficially" was on hpana.com because someone wrote an
> essay/commentary in Dec.'05 saying that 7/07/07 would be a cool date to
> release the book. There's been absolutely nothing official anywhere
> that would indicate that date at all.
>
> Cassie
>
But wouldn't be even cooler if it is released July 31, as it's both
Harry's and Jo's b-days?...
(wait two weeks: people will swear they heard it from a reliable
source... :S)
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297788 ] |
So, 09 Juli 2006 04:01 |
|
<wadkin2000 [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1152405995.615971.148030 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> Kish wrote:
>> The Magic Engineer wrote:
>>
>> > I've always heard that it is going to be 7/7/07, right in time for my
>> > b-day.
>>
>> I've heard that a lot, too. But never ever from a source genuinely
>> linked to J. K. Rowling. On this newgroup, it went from, "Maybe it will
>> be 7/7/07, wouldn't that be cool?" to, "I heard it was planned for
>> 7/7/07" to, now, "Rowling said it would come out on 7/7/07."
>
>
> You're right Kish. The only place I've ever seen it mentioned
> "unofficially" was on hpana.com because someone wrote an
> essay/commentary in Dec.'05 saying that 7/07/07 would be a cool date to
> release the book. There's been absolutely nothing official anywhere
> that would indicate that date at all.
Why not release it on September 11? That's as cool as July 7. (Hint - Check
the news from the UK from last week)
BC
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297815 ] |
So, 09 Juli 2006 15:12 |
|
"drusilla" <me [at] me.net> wrote in message news:e8pkkh$3df$1 [at] nntp.aioe.org...
> wadkin2000 [at] yahoo.com escribió:
>> Kish wrote:
>>> The Magic Engineer wrote:
>>>
>>>> I've always heard that it is going to be 7/7/07, right in time for my
>>>> b-day.
>>> I've heard that a lot, too. But never ever from a source genuinely
>>> linked to J. K. Rowling. On this newgroup, it went from, "Maybe it will
>>> be 7/7/07, wouldn't that be cool?" to, "I heard it was planned for
>>> 7/7/07" to, now, "Rowling said it would come out on 7/7/07."
>>
>>
>> You're right Kish. The only place I've ever seen it mentioned
>> "unofficially" was on hpana.com because someone wrote an
>> essay/commentary in Dec.'05 saying that 7/07/07 would be a cool date to
>> release the book. There's been absolutely nothing official anywhere
>> that would indicate that date at all.
>>
>> Cassie
>>
> But wouldn't be even cooler if it is released July 31, as it's both
> Harry's and Jo's b-days?...
> (wait two weeks: people will swear they heard it from a reliable source...
> :S)
There is a problem in the UK with a 7/7/07 release date, remember it was
that date last year when all the bombings in London happened, I really can't
see her using that date now!! It is the equivelant to the US 9/11!!
Snake Lady
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297861 ] |
Mo, 10 Juli 2006 13:03 |
|
In article <Xns97FA1B95F2FAET.Forch [at] 130.133.1.4>,
Troels Forchhammer <Troels [at] ThisIsFake.invalid> wrote:
<snip>
> in general we've got about six
>months of advance notice of the release date
<snip>
>Furthermore all the books have been released in June or July (6 June to
>16 July), and it is a reasonable supposition that the last book will
>also be released during these two months.
A chapter a day? That would take about two months. :-)
At least it would end the "I read it in <x> hours" brags.
=Tamar
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297936 ] |
Di, 11 Juli 2006 05:06 |
|
"Snake Lady" <samandjanetknox [at] tessco.net> wrote in message
news:mh7sg.93589$uP.5342 [at] newsfe2-gui.ntli.net...
>
> "drusilla" <me [at] me.net> wrote in message
> news:e8pkkh$3df$1 [at] nntp.aioe.org...
>> wadkin2000 [at] yahoo.com escribió:
>>> Kish wrote:
>>>> The Magic Engineer wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I've always heard that it is going to be 7/7/07, right in time for my
>>>>> b-day.
>>>> I've heard that a lot, too. But never ever from a source genuinely
>>>> linked to J. K. Rowling. On this newgroup, it went from, "Maybe it
>>>> will
>>>> be 7/7/07, wouldn't that be cool?" to, "I heard it was planned for
>>>> 7/7/07" to, now, "Rowling said it would come out on 7/7/07."
>>>
>>>
>>> You're right Kish. The only place I've ever seen it mentioned
>>> "unofficially" was on hpana.com because someone wrote an
>>> essay/commentary in Dec.'05 saying that 7/07/07 would be a cool date to
>>> release the book. There's been absolutely nothing official anywhere
>>> that would indicate that date at all.
>>>
>>> Cassie
>>>
>> But wouldn't be even cooler if it is released July 31, as it's both
>> Harry's and Jo's b-days?...
>> (wait two weeks: people will swear they heard it from a reliable
>> source... :S)
>
> There is a problem in the UK with a 7/7/07 release date, remember it was
> that date last year when all the bombings in London happened, I really
> can't see her using that date now!! It is the equivelant to the US
> 9/11!!
Oh yeah.... =( Yah, that would be a bad date...
TME
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297982 ] |
Di, 11 Juli 2006 17:50 |
|
Troels Forchhammer wrote:
> In message <news:e8n1uh$ngl$1 [at] nntp.aioe.org> "Magic_Mom"
> <nofreakinway [at] yeahright.com> enriched us with:
> >
>
> <snip>
>
> > And now I am waiting to see how long it takes for the snippet from
> > CNN, posted on Mugglenet today, about how SCHOLASTIC would like a
> > 2007 release date, to end up here as someone swearing that is
> > gospel truth for a confirmed release period.
>
> Well, I am sure that they would have liked a 2002 or 2001 release date
> for OotP, but they didn't get that either ;-)
>
> But Rowling said last year that she thought it would "be at least
> another two year wait" (the cub reporters), and that would make it
> summer 2007 at the earliest.
>
> On the other hand, I think the prognosis for a summer 2007 release is
> good at the moment (we're getting some 'things are going fine' reports
> from Jo), but I'd really like for the title to be out within the next
> couple of months (I wouldn't be surprised to see it out a little later
> than last time -- about 9 - 10 months before the release (and therefore
> some 2 - 4 months before the announcement of the release date).
>
Re-read what I said. I said she will probably be finished this
autumn...I didn't say it would be published this Autumn. Autumn lasts
until mid-December, which would mean the book still wouldn't be
officially published until late Spring/early Summer. And the fact that
she has announced such drastic changes (two deaths when they weren't
planned) means that she has obviously made some progress, and the
indications that both her publishers expect the book to be released
next year indicate that we will get it next year (excepting, naturally,
some unforseen circumstances). As for the title, it'd be nice if she
gave it to us at the charity reading in New York, but she may not have
come up with a title yet.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry Potter likely to die in book 7 [message #297990 ] |
Di, 11 Juli 2006 21:01 |
|
In message
<news:1152633037.295069.289770 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>
tbarry22 [at] yahoo.com enriched us with:
>
<snip>
> Re-read what I said.
First of all nothing in the post you reply to addresses anything said
by you.
Secondly I have never directly commented on your post, merely on
somebody else's interpretation of your post -- the idea as presented by
the OP, which may or may not be what you intended to say.
> I said she will probably be finished this autumn...
You said 'completed', which can mean one of several things -- 'ready to
hand in the manuscript' as well as 'ready to print' or 'completed for
release'. The thing that is normally being discussed is the release
date, so the misunderstanding is, IMO, quite natural in this context.
> I didn't say it would be published this Autumn.
Right, you didn't.
> Autumn lasts until mid-December, which would mean the book still
> wouldn't be officially published until late Spring/early Summer.
Some 6 - 7 months after Jo Rowling hands her manuscript to Bloomsbury
and Scholastic, yes.
<snip>
--
Troels Forchhammer
Valid e-mail is <t.forch(a)email.dk>
But the fact that some geniuses were laughed at does not
imply that all who are laughed at are geniuses. They
laughed at Columbus, they laughed at Fulton, they laughed
at the Wright Brothers. But they also laughed at Bozo the
Clown.
- Carl Sagan
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Sa Mai 26 09:27:32 CEST 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,05142 Sekunden |