Sprinkler Systems Uhaul move Lawn care Roses and trees Ford Parts Chrysler Parts Lake Powell New IPod Touch Apps New IPhone Apps IPhone Apps IPad Information IPad Apps Android APPS Android Games APPS Android Systems Android Tablets APPS and Beyond Smartphone Apps Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools Tablet PC Car Sharing Car Leasing Tabler Pc Fly Fishing Toyota Cars Vacation Rentals Stock market NYSE SSE Stock Freight & Shipping News Gluten Lactose Gout My Coupon Life Campgrounds Check Outdoor Kitchen Design and Redoo Bath Remodeling Palm Springs Las Vegas Vacation Tipps Lake Powell Boating Homes for lease Electric and green Car Blog Pearls and diamonds Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
Reader


[Suche]  [Administrator]  [Hinweise zum Reader]  [Startseite]
Fantasy » alt.fan.harry-potter » Ok, we know that...
Ok, we know that... [message #282195] So, 18 Juni 2006 19:34
Froggy  
Hogwarts is falling apart (not literally) but I'm wondering if all the
Houses will rally around Harry in the end and work together? Kinda like an
Us against them sort of thing.... JW.
--
~Froggy~
-------------------------

Keep away from people who try to belittle your ambitions.
Small people always do that, but the really
great make you feel that you, too, can become great.


~Mark Twain~
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #282199 ] So, 18 Juni 2006 20:57
John VanSickle  
Froggy wrote:
> Hogwarts is falling apart (not literally) but I'm wondering if all the
> Houses will rally around Harry in the end and work together? Kinda like an
> Us against them sort of thing.... JW.

We know that unless some temptation is laid before Hufflepuff,
Ravenclaw, or Gryffindor that these three houses will rally around the
effort to defeat Voldemort.

Slytherin may or may not fall this way. The most prominent anti-Harry
figures have departed, probably never to return. Will Slytherin realize
that this infantile self-indulgent fascination with the Dark Arts and
self-aggrandizement has a price that is steeper than humbling themselves?

Regards,
John
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #282213 ] Mo, 19 Juni 2006 01:06
Michael Satterwhite  
Froggy wrote:

> Hogwarts is falling apart (not literally) but I'm wondering if all the
> Houses will rally around Harry in the end and work together? Kinda like
> an Us against them sort of thing.... JW.

Actually, I've always wondered why LV and the death eaters are considered
such an extreme problem. They are a very small percentage of the wizarding
population. Death eaters are recognizable by their marks - and it's already
a good bet that those who were before (and renounced) are again. Even LV
could be overwhelmed by the sheer number of witches and wizards against
them.
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #282221 ] Mo, 19 Juni 2006 02:58
Thomas Madura  
Michael Satterwhite wrote:
> Froggy wrote:
>
>
>>Hogwarts is falling apart (not literally) but I'm wondering if all the
>>Houses will rally around Harry in the end and work together? Kinda like
>>an Us against them sort of thing.... JW.
>
>
> Actually, I've always wondered why LV and the death eaters are considered
> such an extreme problem. They are a very small percentage of the wizarding
> population. Death eaters are recognizable by their marks - and it's already
> a good bet that those who were before (and renounced) are again. Even LV
> could be overwhelmed by the sheer number of witches and wizards against
> them.
>
>

It is not unusual for a serial Killer to be considered an extreme
problem - and they normally work alone.

Take a serial killer who works with a band of followers - add the fact
that he is an incredibly powerful Wizard (Neither Lily nor James were a
match for him - nor anyone in the OOP except Dumbledore) who wants
"power" for the sake of power. Add the fact that his followers are
resonably powerful themselves, are well placed socially and financially,
and fullfill the requirement of being purebloods all of whom consider
"mudbloods" beneath them.

Now - add to that group a curse that only TWO people have ever survived
(Both Harry and Riddle survived, Riddle due to Horcruxes but he
nevertheless did not die).

And - add of final thought - Only ONE person - an underage Wizard of
Non-exceptional strength when compared to the Death Eaters - much less
Dumbledore or V - has the power to Vanquish V. Everyone else who fights
him - Even a huge number of Wizards and Witches(As you said)- cannot
Vanquish him. Yet - Harry himself has no such protection from other
wizards.

Add a bunch of Bumbling politicians, No apparent plan for Harry to
Vanquish V, the loss of DD - the only Wizard V feared, and the defection
of the Dementors to V's side.

AND - You WONDER why V is such a problem?

Maybe the books weren't for you.
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #282226 ] Mo, 19 Juni 2006 04:33
Jean Lamb  
> Hogwarts is falling apart (not literally) but I'm wondering if all the
> Houses will rally around Harry in the end and work together? Kinda like
> an Us against them sort of thing.... JW.
> --
> ~Froggy~
> -------------------------

--It depends. Harry did not include any Slytherins in the DA. He may feel
that house should not exist at all. If he somehow succeeds in eliminating
that House before the end of the war, the other two houses may wonder if
they'll end up demonized next. For the sake of the war, I should think
nearly all the Hufflepuffs (Remember Cedric Diggory!) and some of the
Ravenclaws (remember what happened to Edgecombe, and let's not get on the
Gryffindors' bad side!) will likely join in on the Order's side. I very
much suspect none of the Slytherins will be asked, even if some do want to
help and have knowledge and connections that _would_ be helpful. After all,
it doesn't sound like that much fun being a DE anyway, especially if you're
younger and smaller than those like Greyback, and not as crazy as Bellatrix.

Just my opinion,


--
Jean Lamb, tlambs1138 [at] charter.net
"Research is hard. Torturing heroes is fun."--Mary Jo Putney
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #282231 ] Mo, 19 Juni 2006 09:49
Toon  
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 18:57:15 GMT, John VanSickle
<evilsnack [at] earthlink.net> wrote:

> Will Slytherin realize
>that this infantile self-indulgent fascination with the Dark Arts and
>self-aggrandizement has a price that is steeper than humbling themselves?

Yeah, but it'll be too late when they do.
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #282232 ] Mo, 19 Juni 2006 09:50
Toon  
On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 23:06:18 GMT, Michael Satterwhite
<satterwh.X$NO$S$PAM [at] weblore.com> wrote:

>Froggy wrote:
>
>> Hogwarts is falling apart (not literally) but I'm wondering if all the
>> Houses will rally around Harry in the end and work together? Kinda like
>> an Us against them sort of thing.... JW.
>
>Actually, I've always wondered why LV and the death eaters are considered
>such an extreme problem. They are a very small percentage of the wizarding
>population. Death eaters are recognizable by their marks - and it's already
>a good bet that those who were before (and renounced) are again. Even LV
>could be overwhelmed by the sheer number of witches and wizards against
>them.
>

Fear and propaganda are quite powerful weapons for the few to use
against the many. if you see a bunch of top rate wizards fall to a
few De's and V here and there, you quickly learn not to follow suit.
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #282235 ] Mo, 19 Juni 2006 12:32
Sapphire  
I'm probably mangling some incredibly famous persons quote, but isn't
there a saying that if you kill one man, you frighten a thousand?

A large number of witches/wizards trying to overwhelm LV would know
that they would suffer signifiant casualties (I would guess, am not an
expert), and would all have to be very selfless to try it and risk a
horrible death - the fear of that would surely discourage them from
banding together. Aren't most of them more likely to keep their heads
down and wait for someone else to take care of the problem?

Perhaps LV's high profile killings, such as Cedric, are clever tools of
propoganda to keep the masses in line?
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #282250 ] Mo, 19 Juni 2006 20:35
Fish Eye no Miko  
John VanSickle wrote:

> We know that unless some temptation is laid before Hufflepuff,
> Ravenclaw, or Gryffindor that these three houses will rally around
> the effort to defeat Voldemort. Slytherin may or may not fall this way.
> The most prominent
> anti-Harry figures have departed, probably never to return. Will
> Slytherin realize that this infantile self-indulgent fascination
> with the Dark Arts and self-aggrandizement has a price that is
> steeper than humbling themselves?

I dunno.. Will the teachers stop treating them like outcasts, and
encouraging the House rivalries, most of which end up with the other Houses
all pulling for whomever is going up against Slytherin?

Catherine Johnson.
--
fenm at cox dot net
"Don't go to Europe to 'find yourself'. Who told you that you were over
there, anyway?"
-Stephen Colbert, _The Colbert Report_.
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #282266 ] Mo, 19 Juni 2006 23:17
Michael Satterwhite  
Thom Madura wrote:

> And - add of final thought - Only ONE person - an underage Wizard of
> Non-exceptional strength when compared to the Death Eaters - much less
> Dumbledore or V - has the power to Vanquish V. Everyone else who fights
> him - Even a huge number of Wizards and Witches(As you said)- cannot
> Vanquish him. Yet - Harry himself has no such protection from other
> wizards.

We don't *KNOW* that. Logically, it is impossible to prove a negative. Even
Dumbledore warned that prophecies can be misinterpreted.

The same fallacy fell into the X-3 film. They said at the beginning that the
mutant cure was permanent, but there's no way they could know that. At best
they could say they'd never seen it wear off.

Sometimes the real meaning of "Can't" is "Won't". In this case, Wizard "A"
says "only Harry can kill him, so I may as well not try"

>
> Add a bunch of Bumbling politicians, No apparent plan for Harry to
> Vanquish V, the loss of DD - the only Wizard V feared, and the defection
> of the Dementors to V's side.
>
> AND - You WONDER why V is such a problem?

> Maybe the books weren't for you.

....and maybe logic isn't for you. *PLEASE*! The moment an implied insult is
tossed as an argument, the assumption is that the person producing it can't
think rationally. Show yourself to be better than that - I know you are.
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #282272 ] Di, 20 Juni 2006 01:34
Thomas Madura  
Michael Satterwhite wrote:

> Thom Madura wrote:
>
>
>>And - add of final thought - Only ONE person - an underage Wizard of
>>Non-exceptional strength when compared to the Death Eaters - much less
>>Dumbledore or V - has the power to Vanquish V. Everyone else who fights
>>him - Even a huge number of Wizards and Witches(As you said)- cannot
>>Vanquish him. Yet - Harry himself has no such protection from other
>>wizards.
>
>
> We don't *KNOW* that. Logically, it is impossible to prove a negative. Even
> Dumbledore warned that prophecies can be misinterpreted.
>
> The same fallacy fell into the X-3 film. They said at the beginning that the
> mutant cure was permanent, but there's no way they could know that. At best
> they could say they'd never seen it wear off.
>
> Sometimes the real meaning of "Can't" is "Won't". In this case, Wizard "A"
> says "only Harry can kill him, so I may as well not try"
>
>
>>Add a bunch of Bumbling politicians, No apparent plan for Harry to
>>Vanquish V, the loss of DD - the only Wizard V feared, and the defection
>>of the Dementors to V's side.
>>
>>AND - You WONDER why V is such a problem?
>
>
>>Maybe the books weren't for you.
>
>
> ...and maybe logic isn't for you. *PLEASE*! The moment an implied insult is
> tossed as an argument, the assumption is that the person producing it can't
> think rationally. Show yourself to be better than that - I know you are.
>


I am sorry about the implied insult - although it was not meant as an
argument - I gave quite a number of those. I just believe that anyone
who would question the "extreme Problem" of V and the Death Eaters
either Hasn't read the books - OR - just posted that as a "Toon is a
Horcrux" statement in order to get replies.

I disagree with you about the first matter though -

Even if a Prophecy can be misinterpreted - as DD has said - there has
been NO statement that anyone else has the ability to stuff V forever.

It appears to me - based on the first 6 books (I don't trust Toons
quotes from book seven much) - that Harry is going to go into battle
against V - and somehow he will have to do the job - maybe with help
from Snape, Pettigrew, Dumbledore (Dead or alive), his mothers love and
eyes, the powers and language he got through his scar from V, Ron and
other Weasleys, Hermione, the OOP, his special wand, the MOM, his
friends and teachers at Hogwarts, his muggle relatives, and a "little
bit 'O' luck" too.

In the end - V will be Vanquished - almost certainly by Harry - and
Harry will not only live to tell about it - but will live to join Moody
as an Auror. (IF Moody lives).


(Did I miss anything?)


Everything considered - we certainly know an awful lot about what is in
the last book.
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #282279 ] Di, 20 Juni 2006 06:58
Toon  
On 19 Jun 2006 03:32:39 -0700, sapphireunicorn [at] hotmail.com wrote:

>I'm probably mangling some incredibly famous persons quote, but isn't
>there a saying that if you kill one man, you frighten a thousand?
>
>A large number of witches/wizards trying to overwhelm LV would know
>that they would suffer signifiant casualties (I would guess, am not an
>expert), and would all have to be very selfless to try it and risk a
>horrible death - the fear of that would surely discourage them from
>banding together. Aren't most of them more likely to keep their heads
>down and wait for someone else to take care of the problem?

Yup. lay low, don't piss them off, and wait for a baby to save the
day. Then think the worse of him as a teen.
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #282366 ] Do, 22 Juni 2006 14:57
John VanSickle  
Fish Eye no Miko wrote:
> John VanSickle wrote:
>
>
>>We know that unless some temptation is laid before Hufflepuff,
>>Ravenclaw, or Gryffindor that these three houses will rally around
>>the effort to defeat Voldemort. Slytherin may or may not fall this way.
>>The most prominent
>>anti-Harry figures have departed, probably never to return. Will
>>Slytherin realize that this infantile self-indulgent fascination
>>with the Dark Arts and self-aggrandizement has a price that is
>>steeper than humbling themselves?
>
>
> I dunno.. Will the teachers stop treating them like outcasts, and
> encouraging the House rivalries, most of which end up with the other Houses
> all pulling for whomever is going up against Slytherin?

A good point, although I'm not quite sure that anyone except perhaps
Hagrid, and to a far lesser extent McGonagall, allowed any
anti-Slytherin bias to significantly affect their treatment of the
students. If the faculty practiced a significant bias, Slytherin would
not have ended Harry's first year with the clear lead in house points.

I'm tempted to argue that Snape's blatant favoritism probably infected
his students to a large degree, and that their subsequent behavior is
what poisoned the atmosphere of the school.

Slughorn's favoritism was mostly independent of house membership; he
doted on talented students no matter what house they were in.

Regards,
John
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #282433 ] Sa, 24 Juni 2006 14:04
mcdowella  
In article <Hswmg.10126$o4.8730 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>, John
VanSickle <evilsnack [at] earthlink.net> writes
>Fish Eye no Miko wrote:
>> John VanSickle wrote:
>>
>>
>>>We know that unless some temptation is laid before Hufflepuff,
>>>Ravenclaw, or Gryffindor that these three houses will rally around
>>>the effort to defeat Voldemort. Slytherin may or may not fall this way.
>>>The most prominent
>>>anti-Harry figures have departed, probably never to return. Will
>>>Slytherin realize that this infantile self-indulgent fascination
>>>with the Dark Arts and self-aggrandizement has a price that is
>>>steeper than humbling themselves?
>>
>>
>> I dunno.. Will the teachers stop treating them like outcasts, and
>> encouraging the House rivalries, most of which end up with the other Houses
>> all pulling for whomever is going up against Slytherin?
>
>A good point, although I'm not quite sure that anyone except perhaps
>Hagrid, and to a far lesser extent McGonagall, allowed any
>anti-Slytherin bias to significantly affect their treatment of the
>students. If the faculty practiced a significant bias, Slytherin would
>not have ended Harry's first year with the clear lead in house points.
>
>I'm tempted to argue that Snape's blatant favoritism probably infected
>his students to a large degree, and that their subsequent behavior is
>what poisoned the atmosphere of the school.
>
>Slughorn's favoritism was mostly independent of house membership; he
>doted on talented students no matter what house they were in.
>
>Regards,
>John
I think there is more going on than inter-house rivalry. For a start, as
readers we know more about what is going on than most of the
participants, especially those not in Gryffindor. Note that Ernie
Milligan was convinced that Harry was the heir of Slytherin in CoS.
Until the end of OTP Fudge's position (that Voldemort had not returned)
was unreasonable only because he received very specific and very clear
information at the end of GoF. As Hermione points out in OTP "Detention
with Dolores", if you don't have the guts or the attention span to
really take in Dumbledore's speech at the end of GoF and reject the
rubbish the Daily Prophet is spouting you wouldn't believe that Harry
was anything more than a somewhat dangerous lunatic.

Even then: put yourself in the position of a Ravenclaw with Newts or
OWLs coming up. Which is more important, getting a good education that
will equip you to help deal with Voldemort when you are old enough to
make the very serious decision to start fighting, or going off half-
cocked and half-trained to follow a leader whose last leadership
decision left a fair proportion of his followers injured trying to
rescue someone who didn't need rescuing until he got himself killed
trying to save his supposed rescuers?

As for the Slytherins, I don't think we see much evidence of Slytherin
house itself being a corrupting influence. Draco and his cronies all
come from Death Eater families. Their actions are more precipitate than
their families would like (e.g. CoS "At Flourish and Blotts" - "I would
remind you that it is not - prudent - to appear less than fond of Harry
Potter") but their basic allegiance is in line with their families.
--
A.G.McDowell
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #282439 ] So, 25 Juni 2006 01:22
karnak17  
A.G.McDowell wrote:
> In article <Hswmg.10126$o4.8730 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>, John
> VanSickle <evilsnack [at] earthlink.net> writes
> >Fish Eye no Miko wrote:
> >> John VanSickle wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>We know that unless some temptation is laid before Hufflepuff,
> >>>Ravenclaw, or Gryffindor that these three houses will rally around
> >>>the effort to defeat Voldemort. Slytherin may or may not fall this way.
> >>>The most prominent
> >>>anti-Harry figures have departed, probably never to return. Will
> >>>Slytherin realize that this infantile self-indulgent fascination
> >>>with the Dark Arts and self-aggrandizement has a price that is
> >>>steeper than humbling themselves?

Slytherin has been "humbled" by Griffindor for about six years now,
since Griffindor ended their winning streak in PS/SS. I believe that
their winning streak was seven years long? Looks like Gryffindor is
out to match their achievement, and as a House, seems even more in need
of humbling just at the moment.

> >> I dunno.. Will the teachers stop treating them like outcasts, and
> >> encouraging the House rivalries, most of which end up with the other Houses
> >> all pulling for whomever is going up against Slytherin?
> >
> >A good point, although I'm not quite sure that anyone except perhaps
> >Hagrid, and to a far lesser extent McGonagall, allowed any
> >anti-Slytherin bias to significantly affect their treatment of the
> >students.

Dumbledore, at the end of PS/SS. He describes his treatment of Harry
as motivated by his love for him as an individual, but to observers, it
may well have appeared to be House favoritism. And his behavior (the
whole staff's behavior) during the whole Marauders period seems, from
what we know so far, extremely blameworthy.

> >If the faculty practiced a significant bias, Slytherin would
> >not have ended Harry's first year with the clear lead in house points.

Just to point out, that when you say McGonagall and Hagrid, you are
talking about the ONLY two teachers, other than Snape, who we get to
see enough of to compare. Harry's class with Sprout is shared with
Hufflepuff. I forget about Trelawney, but it surely was not Slytherin.
I don't think they share the Charms class with Flitwick either. We
know nothing about Sinestra and Vector. If even the most supposedly
"fair" teacher in the school does display SOME degree of anti-Slytherin
bias, we cannot simply assume that the others are free of it based on
zero knowlege.

> >I'm tempted to argue that Snape's blatant favoritism probably infected
> >his students to a large degree, and that their subsequent behavior is
> >what poisoned the atmosphere of the school.

The Hat seems to think the problem goes back to Salazar Slytherin. But
however that may be, laying it all on Snape is a bit much. He may,
certainly, have "poisoned the atmosphere", but back when he was a
student, there was certainly plenty of poison in the atmosphere. The
Marauders were able to bully and attempt murder without losing the love
and fondness of staff like McGonagall and Hagrid or even Dumbledore.
How much this was due to House favoritism, and how much to James and
Sirius personal charm I do not know. But it is to be noted that
SLUGHORN, the Head of Slytherin at the time, would have been JUST as
much a fullsome James Potter groupie as anybody else -- and that this
was probably part of the reason why Snape had to endure so much
bullying. It is natural that Snape would despise Sluggie for this, and
attempt to be a different sort of Head of House by showing loyalty
(i.e. favoritism) to his own students, and standing up for them against
bullies like nasty, big-headed Harry Potter.

My point is that the poison does not originate with Snape's generation,
any more than it originates with Draco. Sirius Black's unreasoning
hatred of Snape can be looked at as displaced hostility against his
better-loved younger brother, even as Harry's dislike of Draco
originated with the fact that Draco reminded Harry of Dudley. The
older generation infects the young with their own poison.

> >Slughorn's favoritism was mostly independent of house membership; he
> >doted on talented students no matter what house they were in.
> >
> >Regards,
> >John

> I think there is more going on than inter-house rivalry. For a start, as
> readers we know more about what is going on than most of the
> participants, especially those not in Gryffindor. Note that Ernie
> Milligan was convinced that Harry was the heir of Slytherin in CoS.
> Until the end of OTP Fudge's position (that Voldemort had not returned)
> was unreasonable only because he received very specific and very clear
> information at the end of GoF. As Hermione points out in OTP "Detention
> with Dolores", if you don't have the guts or the attention span to
> really take in Dumbledore's speech at the end of GoF and reject the
> rubbish the Daily Prophet is spouting you wouldn't believe that Harry
> was anything more than a somewhat dangerous lunatic.
>
> Even then: put yourself in the position of a Ravenclaw with Newts or
> OWLs coming up. Which is more important, getting a good education that
> will equip you to help deal with Voldemort when you are old enough to
> make the very serious decision to start fighting, or going off half-
> cocked and half-trained to follow a leader whose last leadership
> decision left a fair proportion of his followers injured trying to
> rescue someone who didn't need rescuing until he got himself killed
> trying to save his supposed rescuers?

Good point. I really don't see Harry LEADING students off on a
crusade. Even Hermione, who pushed for him to lead the DA, didn't push
for that. I think that Voldemort will bring the fight to them. There
is quite a bit of evidence that there is something at the school that
the wants. He is going to come and get it, and the students will have
to react.

> As for the Slytherins, I don't think we see much evidence of Slytherin
> house itself being a corrupting influence. Draco and his cronies all
> come from Death Eater families. Their actions are more precipitate than
> their families would like (e.g. CoS "At Flourish and Blotts" - "I would
> remind you that it is not - prudent - to appear less than fond of Harry
> Potter") but their basic allegiance is in line with their families.

Agreed. Ron and Draco had not yet been sorted when they met on the
train to Hogwarts, but they already hated eachother by family
reputation. OTOH, they were also both from families where House
affiliation was virtually fixed in stone.
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #282453 ] So, 25 Juni 2006 10:07
Toon  
On 24 Jun 2006 16:22:22 -0700, "Karnak17" <karnak17 [at] cs.com> wrote:


>student, there was certainly plenty of poison in the atmosphere. The
>Marauders were able to bully and attempt murder without losing the love
>and fondness of staff like McGonagall and Hagrid or even Dumbledore.
>How much this was due to House favoritism, and how much to James and
>Sirius personal charm I do not know.

Judging by the usual staff over the years, Personal Charm. Tom had
the faculty wrapped around his little finger because of his charm.
sure, Slytherin had less of an all evil reputation, but it still
wasn't the most liked. But I don't think the biasness arose until
they all served Voldemort. If the greater majority of a house follows
the Ultimate evil, you tend to look down upon the whole house.
Especially if the House is based off a guy who believed Purebloods
only, and the house members are following a Pureblood only philosophy.

All Slytherin aren't evil, but enough of them are to make it a
believed stereotype. So, before this happened, the hatred would be
less, and Personal Charm would go a long way. But DD saw the real Tom
at the orphanage, so he was never fooled. He knew something was up.
Even his second chances beliefs was sorely tested with Tom. He hoped
the boy had changed, but even he wouldn't accept it friviously.

>
>Good point. I really don't see Harry LEADING students off on a
>crusade. Even Hermione, who pushed for him to lead the DA, didn't push
>for that. I think that Voldemort will bring the fight to them. There
>is quite a bit of evidence that there is something at the school that
>the wants. He is going to come and get it, and the students will have
>to react.

Unless DD figured it out and moved it. and if Harry finds out, he can
try to log into V and let him know in a dream.
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #291567 ] Di, 27 Juni 2006 05:51
dicconf  
In article <gjgs9254co4eeemsf334vama9b4uglapqv [at] 4ax.com>,
Toon <toon [at] toon.com> wrote:
>Karnaki wrote
<snip>
>> I think that Voldemort will bring the fight to them. There
>>is quite a bit of evidence that there is something at the school that
>>the wants. He is going to come and get it, and the students will have
>>to react.
>
>Unless DD figured it out and moved it. and if Harry finds out, he can
>try to log into V and let him know in a dream.
>

Thank you for that mental image...
_Hacking Legilimency for Squibs_, page 666: when logging into
You-Know-Who's subconscious, the password is "pureblood".

=Tamar
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #291578 ] Di, 27 Juni 2006 06:52
Toon  
On Tue, 27 Jun 2006 03:51:00 -0000, dicconf [at] radix.net (Richard Eney)
wrote:

>In article <gjgs9254co4eeemsf334vama9b4uglapqv [at] 4ax.com>,
>Toon <toon [at] toon.com> wrote:
>>Karnaki wrote
><snip>
>>> I think that Voldemort will bring the fight to them. There
>>>is quite a bit of evidence that there is something at the school that
>>>the wants. He is going to come and get it, and the students will have
>>>to react.
>>
>>Unless DD figured it out and moved it. and if Harry finds out, he can
>>try to log into V and let him know in a dream.
>>
>
>Thank you for that mental image...
>_Hacking Legilimency for Squibs_, page 666: when logging into
>You-Know-Who's subconscious, the password is "pureblood".
>
>=Tamar

No, it's "FwuffyBunnies". Never see that one coming.
Re: Ok, we know that... [message #291677 ] Di, 27 Juni 2006 22:26
dicconf  
In article <nae1a2ldnblpeblp5o567psg0cleru8c4o [at] 4ax.com>,
Toon <toon [at] toon.com> wrote:
> dicconf [at] radix.net (Richard Eney) wrote:
>>Toon <toon [at] toon.com> wrote:
<snip>

>>>Unless DD figured it out and moved it. and if Harry finds out, he can
>>>try to log into V and let him know in a dream.
>>
>>Thank you for that mental image...
>>_Hacking Legilimency for Squibs_, page 666: when logging into
>>You-Know-Who's subconscious, the password is "pureblood".
>>
>>=Tamar
>
>No, it's "FwuffyBunnies". Never see that one coming.

Too many characters, and one of them ought to be a capital letter,
and another should be a numeral. "FwfyBun1" ?

=Tamar
Vorheriges Thema:Scientific American Online & the Potterverse
Nächstes Thema:Solving the potion puzzle (was Re: Dumbledore's trust into Snape)
Gehe zu:
  


aktuelle Zeit: Sa Mai 26 07:28:40 CEST 2012

Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,06666 Sekunden
.:: Startseite - Hinweise - Impressum ::.

Powered