| a newbie's potterological theories [message #281584] |
Fr, 09 Juni 2006 06:42 |
|
firstly, i will say that there's quite a lot to be said for the view
that mcgonagall is evil. she did, after all, have a fairly disgusting
affair with snape. and her stockings were a horcrux. but then, what,
including mundungus's tobacco pipe, isn't. i'm strongly drawn to the
view that the earth is a horcfrux and that the hero will have to
destroy the world in order to save it. this will lead to a lot of
angst, which is quite charming.(*)
a friend of mine has suggested that dudley is a horcrux, which explains
why he's so fat; he has to eat for two. and, in light of the "oh, oh,
i'm a horcrux" thread: is there a support group for horcruxes? "my
name is X, and i'm a ... horcrux."
i said "the hero" and not "harry" above, because harry will be revealed
to be evil. it's pretty obvious, when you come to think about it. he
probably murdered cedric, certainly offed sirius, and then killed
dumbledore while framing snape. can nothing abate his evil?
and by the way, those who think harry will marry hermione are
delusional, because he will find true love with bellatrix.
and winky will end up being the true hero.
(*)since the earth is a horcrux, the tectonic plates must be
voldemort's soul fragments.
|
|
|
| Re: a newbie's potterological theories [message #281609 ] |
Fr, 09 Juni 2006 16:32 |
|
You appear to be reasonably intelligent. Would it be possible for you
to type correctly as well? It's very difficult to read without proper
capitalizations. It hurts my eyes.
M_m
|
|
|
| Re: a newbie's potterological theories [message #281636 ] |
Sa, 10 Juni 2006 04:23 |
|
Magic_mom wrote:
> You appear to be reasonably intelligent. Would it be possible for you
> to type correctly as well? It's very difficult to read without proper
> capitalizations. It hurts my eyes.
>
> M_m
Sorry! My shift key was also a horcrux, you see.
|
|
|
