| Why the Prequel trilogy changed the sense of the Original trilogy [message #279502] |
Mi, 14 Juni 2006 03:59 |
|
|
http://zhouzhuang.livejournal.com/1090.html
|
|
|
| Re: Why the Prequel trilogy changed the sense of the Original trilogy [message #279503 ] |
Mi, 14 Juni 2006 06:19 |
|
In article <1150250362.664021.284850 [at] h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
milivella [at] gmail.com wrote:
> http://zhouzhuang.livejournal.com/1090.html
Typical load of nonsense that most "blogs" are. :-\
|
|
|
| Re: Why the Prequel trilogy changed the sense of the Original trilogy [message #279504 ] |
Mi, 14 Juni 2006 06:31 |
|
Anybody wrote:
> In article <1150250362.664021.284850 [at] h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> milivella [at] gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>>http://zhouzhuang.livejournal.com/1090.html
>
>
> Typical load of nonsense that most "blogs" are. :-\
Agree. Especially with this one. Maybe it lost it's meaning in translation?
H.
|
|
|
| Re: Why the Prequel trilogy changed the sense of the Original trilogy [message #279512 ] |
Mi, 14 Juni 2006 14:36 |
|
H wrote:
> Anybody wrote:
>
> > In article <1150250362.664021.284850 [at] h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > milivella [at] gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >
> >>http://zhouzhuang.livejournal.com/1090.html
> >
> >
> > Typical load of nonsense that most "blogs" are. :-\
>
> Agree. Especially with this one. Maybe it lost it's meaning in translation?
>
> H.
it doesn't make sense man.
|
|
|
| Re: Why the Prequel trilogy changed the sense of the Original trilogy [message #279536 ] |
Fr, 16 Juni 2006 22:59 |
|
Anybody wrote:
> In article <1150250362.664021.284850 [at] h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> milivella [at] gmail.com wrote:
>
>> http://zhouzhuang.livejournal.com/1090.html
>
> Typical load of nonsense that most "blogs" are. :-\
Knock it off with the ":-\", whiner.
|
|
|
| Re: Why the Prequel trilogy changed the sense of the Original trilogy [message #279539 ] |
Sa, 17 Juni 2006 01:37 |
|
In article <e6v5ru$r3g$1 [at] nntp.aioe.org>, Chief Joseph
<fightnomore [at] forever.org> wrote:
> Anybody wrote:
> > In article <1150250362.664021.284850 [at] h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > milivella [at] gmail.com wrote:
> >
> >> http://zhouzhuang.livejournal.com/1090.html
> >
> > Typical load of nonsense that most "blogs" are. :-\
>
> Knock it off with the ":-\", whiner.
Another idiot heading for the killfile? Quite likely. :-\
|
|
|