| Harry is a horcrux [message #278161] |
Mo, 05 Juni 2006 07:06 |
|
I think Voldemort accidently transferred part of his soul to Harry when
he tried to kill him, making Harry a horcrux, which should generate some
very interesting plot turns and dilemmas on how to kill Voldemort.
Does Harry have to die for Voldemort to die?
This would explain Harry's "connection" with Voldemort.
Sorry if this has been covered before, but it just dawned on me, and
I've never been on this list before.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #278174 ] |
Mo, 05 Juni 2006 12:08 |
|
Taunto wrote:
> I think Voldemort accidently transferred part of his soul to Harry when
> he tried to kill him, making Harry a horcrux, which should generate some
> very interesting plot turns and dilemmas on how to kill Voldemort.
>
> Does Harry have to die for Voldemort to die?
>
> This would explain Harry's "connection" with Voldemort.
>
> Sorry if this has been covered before, but it just dawned on me, and
> I've never been on this list before.
*yells* JANE!
....this one's yours.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #278181 ] |
Mo, 05 Juni 2006 16:13 |
|
"Taunto" <nope [at] notme.com> wrote in message
news:4483bbcb$0$65453$742ec2ed [at] news.sonic.net...
>I think Voldemort accidently transferred part of his soul to Harry when he
>tried to kill him, making Harry a horcrux, which should generate some very
>interesting plot turns and dilemmas on how to kill Voldemort.
>
> Does Harry have to die for Voldemort to die?
>
> This would explain Harry's "connection" with Voldemort.
>
> Sorry if this has been covered before, but it just dawned on me, and I've
> never been on this list before.
Holy Department of Redundancy Department, Batman!!!!!!
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #278184 ] |
Mo, 05 Juni 2006 16:50 |
|
BaJoRi wrote:
> "Taunto" <nope [at] notme.com> wrote in message
> news:4483bbcb$0$65453$742ec2ed [at] news.sonic.net...
> >I think Voldemort accidently transferred part of his soul to Harry when he
> >tried to kill him, making Harry a horcrux, which should generate some very
> >interesting plot turns and dilemmas on how to kill Voldemort.
> >
> > Does Harry have to die for Voldemort to die?
> >
> > This would explain Harry's "connection" with Voldemort.
> >
> > Sorry if this has been covered before, but it just dawned on me, and I've
> > never been on this list before.
>
> Holy Department of Redundancy Department, Batman!!!!!!
Ok, I've been reading the back threads, but couldn't respond to them.
And since I'm not going to read all of them before I venture an
opinion, I'll keep venturing opinions.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #278186 ] |
Mo, 05 Juni 2006 17:16 |
|
Taunto wrote:
> I think Voldemort accidently transferred part of his soul to Harry when
> he tried to kill him, making Harry a horcrux, which should generate some
> very interesting plot turns and dilemmas on how to kill Voldemort.
>
> Does Harry have to die for Voldemort to die?
No he doesnt. Harry's horcrux is already destroyed.
Marvolo's ring was originally whole. After destruction it had a
lightning shaped crack. Just like on Harry's forehead.
>
> This would explain Harry's "connection" with Voldemort.
>
> Sorry if this has been covered before, but it just dawned on me, and
> I've never been on this list before.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #278187 ] |
Mo, 05 Juni 2006 17:40 |
|
Marco [at] polo.com wrote:
> Taunto wrote:
> > I think Voldemort accidently transferred part of his soul to Harry when
> > he tried to kill him, making Harry a horcrux, which should generate some
> > very interesting plot turns and dilemmas on how to kill Voldemort.
> >
> > Does Harry have to die for Voldemort to die?
>
> No he doesnt. Harry's horcrux is already destroyed.
>
> Marvolo's ring was originally whole. After destruction it had a
> lightning shaped crack. Just like on Harry's forehead.
How did it get destroyed?
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #278191 ] |
Mo, 05 Juni 2006 17:57 |
|
In article <1149520595.481213.284500 [at] j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
"Marco [at] polo.com" <motormaroon [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>Taunto wrote:
>> I think Voldemort accidently transferred part of his soul to Harry when
>> he tried to kill him, making Harry a horcrux, which should generate some
>> very interesting plot turns and dilemmas on how to kill Voldemort.
>>
>> Does Harry have to die for Voldemort to die?
>
>No he doesnt. Harry's horcrux is already destroyed.
>
>Marvolo's ring was originally whole. After destruction it had a
>lightning shaped crack.
Only in fan-fic. JKR wrote no such thing.
>Just like on Harry's forehead.
>
>>
>> This would explain Harry's "connection" with Voldemort.
>>
>> Sorry if this has been covered before, but it just dawned on me, and
>> I've never been on this list before.
--
Chris
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #278192 ] |
Mo, 05 Juni 2006 17:58 |
|
In article <1149519017.476858.306480 [at] h76g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, "duh"
<nodamnspamok [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>BaJoRi wrote:
>> "Taunto" <nope [at] notme.com> wrote in message
>> news:4483bbcb$0$65453$742ec2ed [at] news.sonic.net...
>> >I think Voldemort accidently transferred part of his soul to Harry when he
>> >tried to kill him, making Harry a horcrux, which should generate some very
>> >interesting plot turns and dilemmas on how to kill Voldemort.
>> >
>> > Does Harry have to die for Voldemort to die?
>> >
>> > This would explain Harry's "connection" with Voldemort.
>> >
>> > Sorry if this has been covered before, but it just dawned on me, and I've
>> > never been on this list before.
>>
>> Holy Department of Redundancy Department, Batman!!!!!!
>
>Ok, I've been reading the back threads, but couldn't respond to them.
>
>And since I'm not going to read all of them before I venture an
>opinion, I'll keep venturing opinions.
"duh"
Nomen est omen.
--
Chris
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #278193 ] |
Mo, 05 Juni 2006 18:14 |
|
Green-Eyed Chris wrote:
> In article <1149520595.481213.284500 [at] j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> "Marco [at] polo.com" <motormaroon [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Taunto wrote:
> >> I think Voldemort accidently transferred part of his soul to Harry when
> >> he tried to kill him, making Harry a horcrux, which should generate some
> >> very interesting plot turns and dilemmas on how to kill Voldemort.
> >>
> >> Does Harry have to die for Voldemort to die?
> >
> >No he doesnt. Harry's horcrux is already destroyed.
> >
> >Marvolo's ring was originally whole. After destruction it had a
> >lightning shaped crack.
>
> Only in fan-fic. JKR wrote no such thing.
>
> >Just like on Harry's forehead.
> >
> >>
> >> This would explain Harry's "connection" with Voldemort.
> >>
> >> Sorry if this has been covered before, but it just dawned on me, and
> >> I've never been on this list before.
> --
> Chris
Yeah, there is *no* canon saying marvolo's ring has/had anything to do
with Harry's scar. The ring was destroyed by Dumbledore, and it was a
horcrux, but the lightning-shaped crack in the ring doesn't mean
Harry's scar was a horcrux that has already been destroyed.
The "Harry is a horcrux" theory has some merit, but it's still VERY
weak....
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #278196 ] |
Mo, 05 Juni 2006 18:40 |
|
> The "Harry is a horcrux" theory has some merit, but it's still VERY
> weak....
The prophecy does not preclude both of them dying.
In fact, if Harry did die, it would propel the series even further into
the realm of classic literature.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #278197 ] |
Mo, 05 Juni 2006 18:41 |
|
> "duh"
>
> Nomen est omen.
ad hominem non est intelligen
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #278203 ] |
Mo, 05 Juni 2006 19:18 |
|
In article <1149524089.869968.192950 [at] f6g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>,
"AbendrothBlutjager" <arran.m.walker [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>Green-Eyed Chris wrote:
>> In article <1149520595.481213.284500 [at] j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
>> "Marco [at] polo.com" <motormaroon [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Taunto wrote:
>> >> I think Voldemort accidently transferred part of his soul to Harry when
>> >> he tried to kill him, making Harry a horcrux, which should generate some
>> >> very interesting plot turns and dilemmas on how to kill Voldemort.
>> >>
>> >> Does Harry have to die for Voldemort to die?
>> >
>> >No he doesnt. Harry's horcrux is already destroyed.
>> >
>> >Marvolo's ring was originally whole. After destruction it had a
>> >lightning shaped crack.
>>
>> Only in fan-fic. JKR wrote no such thing.
>>
>> >Just like on Harry's forehead.
>> >
>> >>
>> >> This would explain Harry's "connection" with Voldemort.
>> >>
>> >> Sorry if this has been covered before, but it just dawned on me, and
>> >> I've never been on this list before.
>> --
>> Chris
>
>Yeah, there is *no* canon saying marvolo's ring has/had anything to do
>with Harry's scar. The ring was destroyed by Dumbledore, and it was a
>horcrux, but the lightning-shaped crack in the ring doesn't mean
>Harry's scar was a horcrux that has already been destroyed.
>
>The "Harry is a horcrux" theory has some merit, but it's still VERY
>weak....
I must learn to be more precise. The crack in Marvolo's ring is never
described as being lightning shaped. Sometimes a crack is just a crack.
BTW, I don't know what's on your birth certificate. But AbendrotBlutjaeger
(AbendrotBlutjäger) would seem more correct for the image of a teutonic
vampire.
--
Chris
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #278236 ] |
Di, 06 Juni 2006 00:52 |
|
> The "Harry is a horcrux" theory has some merit, but it's still VERY
> weak....
But if its true, should be a mind-bender trying to figure out how he
can survive.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281386 ] |
Di, 06 Juni 2006 05:04 |
|
Green-Eyed Chris wrote:
> In article <1149520595.481213.284500 [at] j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> "Marco [at] polo.com" <motormaroon [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Taunto wrote:
> >> I think Voldemort accidently transferred part of his soul to Harry when
> >> he tried to kill him, making Harry a horcrux, which should generate some
> >> very interesting plot turns and dilemmas on how to kill Voldemort.
> >>
> >> Does Harry have to die for Voldemort to die?
> >
> >No he doesnt. Harry's horcrux is already destroyed.
> >
> >Marvolo's ring was originally whole. After destruction it had a
> >lightning shaped crack.
>
> Only in fan-fic. JKR wrote no such thing.
Actually I was going by the ring portrayed on the dust jacket of the
hard cover edition. While not canon, I don't think the ring with the
lightning bolt crack on it escaped JKR attention.
>
> >Just like on Harry's forehead.
> >
> >>
> >> This would explain Harry's "connection" with Voldemort.
> >>
> >> Sorry if this has been covered before, but it just dawned on me, and
> >> I've never been on this list before.
> --
> Chris
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281421 ] |
Di, 06 Juni 2006 17:50 |
|
AbendrothBlutjager wrote:
> Green-Eyed Chris wrote:
> > In article <1149520595.481213.284500 [at] j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
> > "Marco [at] polo.com" <motormaroon [at] gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > >Taunto wrote:
> > >> I think Voldemort accidently transferred part of his soul to Harry when
> > >> he tried to kill him, making Harry a horcrux, which should generate some
> > >> very interesting plot turns and dilemmas on how to kill Voldemort.
> > >>
> > >> Does Harry have to die for Voldemort to die?
> > >
> > >No he doesnt. Harry's horcrux is already destroyed.
> > >
> > >Marvolo's ring was originally whole. After destruction it had a
> > >lightning shaped crack.
> >
> > Only in fan-fic. JKR wrote no such thing.
> >
> > >Just like on Harry's forehead.
> > >
> > >>
> > >> This would explain Harry's "connection" with Voldemort.
> > >>
> > >> Sorry if this has been covered before, but it just dawned on me, and
> > >> I've never been on this list before.
> > --
> > Chris
>
> Yeah, there is *no* canon saying marvolo's ring has/had anything to do
> with Harry's scar. The ring was destroyed by Dumbledore, and it was a
> horcrux, but the lightning-shaped crack in the ring doesn't mean
> Harry's scar was a horcrux that has already been destroyed.
>
> The "Harry is a horcrux" theory has some merit, but it's still VERY
> weak....
Why not just fly all over the damned place saying "Accio horcrux"? Are
the zombies in the lake going to fly up in the air behind it?
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281454 ] |
Mi, 07 Juni 2006 04:21 |
|
duh wrote:
> AbendrothBlutjager wrote:
>
>>Green-Eyed Chris wrote:
>>
>>>In article <1149520595.481213.284500 [at] j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
>>>"Marco [at] polo.com" <motormaroon [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Taunto wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>I think Voldemort accidently transferred part of his soul to Harry when
>>>>>he tried to kill him, making Harry a horcrux, which should generate some
>>>>>very interesting plot turns and dilemmas on how to kill Voldemort.
>>>>>
>>>>>Does Harry have to die for Voldemort to die?
>>>>
>>>>No he doesnt. Harry's horcrux is already destroyed.
>>>>
>>>>Marvolo's ring was originally whole. After destruction it had a
>>>>lightning shaped crack.
>>>
>>>Only in fan-fic. JKR wrote no such thing.
>>>
>>>
>>>>Just like on Harry's forehead.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>This would explain Harry's "connection" with Voldemort.
>>>>>
>>>>>Sorry if this has been covered before, but it just dawned on me, and
>>>>>I've never been on this list before.
>>>
>>>--
>>>Chris
>>
>>Yeah, there is *no* canon saying marvolo's ring has/had anything to do
>>with Harry's scar. The ring was destroyed by Dumbledore, and it was a
>>horcrux, but the lightning-shaped crack in the ring doesn't mean
>>Harry's scar was a horcrux that has already been destroyed.
>>
>>The "Harry is a horcrux" theory has some merit, but it's still VERY
>>weak....
>
>
> Why not just fly all over the damned place saying "Accio horcrux"? Are
> the zombies in the lake going to fly up in the air behind it?
>
You are assuming only V has made Horcruxes.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281462 ] |
Mi, 07 Juni 2006 05:47 |
|
>
> You are assuming only V has made Horcruxes.
No, just get all of them and be done with it. ;()
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281464 ] |
Mi, 07 Juni 2006 06:09 |
|
In article <1149563071.684194.132280 [at] i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
Marco [at] polo.com <motormaroon [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>Green-Eyed Chris wrote:
>> "Marco [at] polo.com" <motormaroon [at] gmail.com> wrote:
<snip>
>> >Marvolo's ring was originally whole. After destruction it had a
>> >lightning shaped crack.
>>
>> Only in fan-fic. JKR wrote no such thing.
>
>Actually I was going by the ring portrayed on the dust jacket of the
>hard cover edition. While not canon, I don't think the ring with the
>lightning bolt crack on it escaped JKR attention.
Authors don't get to choose what goes on the cover. Even Terry Pratchett
doesn't get that amount of control. Only once that I know of has JKR been
able to get a publisher to change a cover, and that was a European one
(I think Italian but I could be wrong) that had left off his glasses, and
she said the glasses were important to the characterization.
=Tamar
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281474 ] |
Mi, 07 Juni 2006 10:11 |
|
On 6 Jun 2006 08:50:02 -0700, "duh" <nodamnspamok [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>AbendrothBlutjager wrote:
>> Green-Eyed Chris wrote:
>> > In article <1149520595.481213.284500 [at] j55g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>,
>> > "Marco [at] polo.com" <motormaroon [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >Taunto wrote:
>> > >> I think Voldemort accidently transferred part of his soul to Harry when
>> > >> he tried to kill him, making Harry a horcrux, which should generate some
>> > >> very interesting plot turns and dilemmas on how to kill Voldemort.
>> > >>
>> > >> Does Harry have to die for Voldemort to die?
>> > >
>> > >No he doesnt. Harry's horcrux is already destroyed.
>> > >
>> > >Marvolo's ring was originally whole. After destruction it had a
>> > >lightning shaped crack.
>> >
>> > Only in fan-fic. JKR wrote no such thing.
>> >
>> > >Just like on Harry's forehead.
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> This would explain Harry's "connection" with Voldemort.
>> > >>
>> > >> Sorry if this has been covered before, but it just dawned on me, and
>> > >> I've never been on this list before.
>> > --
>> > Chris
>>
>> Yeah, there is *no* canon saying marvolo's ring has/had anything to do
>> with Harry's scar. The ring was destroyed by Dumbledore, and it was a
>> horcrux, but the lightning-shaped crack in the ring doesn't mean
>> Harry's scar was a horcrux that has already been destroyed.
>>
>> The "Harry is a horcrux" theory has some merit, but it's still VERY
>> weak....
>
>Why not just fly all over the damned place saying "Accio horcrux"? Are
>the zombies in the lake going to fly up in the air behind it?
Might need to specify who's horcrux. Porbbaly an anti accio spell.
Like in the cave.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281487 ] |
Mi, 07 Juni 2006 17:25 |
|
> Actually I was going by the ring portrayed on the dust jacket of the
> hard cover edition. While not canon, I don't think the ring with the
> lightning bolt crack on it escaped JKR attention.
I see no ring at all on the U.S. dust jacket.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281497 ] |
Mi, 07 Juni 2006 21:48 |
|
duh wrote:
> > Actually I was going by the ring portrayed on the dust jacket of the
> > hard cover edition. While not canon, I don't think the ring with the
> > lightning bolt crack on it escaped JKR attention.
>
> I see no ring at all on the U.S. dust jacket.
I see no ring on the UK dust jacket.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281538 ] |
Do, 08 Juni 2006 09:38 |
|
On 7 Jun 2006 12:48:16 -0700, "duh" <nodamnspamok [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>duh wrote:
>> > Actually I was going by the ring portrayed on the dust jacket of the
>> > hard cover edition. While not canon, I don't think the ring with the
>> > lightning bolt crack on it escaped JKR attention.
>>
>> I see no ring at all on the U.S. dust jacket.
>
>I see no ring on the UK dust jacket.
The Ring's invisible.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281563 ] |
Fr, 09 Juni 2006 00:08 |
|
Toon wrote:
> On 7 Jun 2006 12:48:16 -0700, "duh" <nodamnspamok [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >duh wrote:
> >> > Actually I was going by the ring portrayed on the dust jacket of the
> >> > hard cover edition. While not canon, I don't think the ring with the
> >> > lightning bolt crack on it escaped JKR attention.
> >>
> >> I see no ring at all on the U.S. dust jacket.
> >
> >I see no ring on the UK dust jacket.
>
> The Ring's invisible.
Do I need my Command Voldemort Decoder contacts?
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281564 ] |
Fr, 09 Juni 2006 00:33 |
|
duh wrote:
> Toon wrote:
> > On 7 Jun 2006 12:48:16 -0700, "duh" <nodamnspamok [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >duh wrote:
> > >> > Actually I was going by the ring portrayed on the dust jacket of the
> > >> > hard cover edition. While not canon, I don't think the ring with the
> > >> > lightning bolt crack on it escaped JKR attention.
> > >>
> > >> I see no ring at all on the U.S. dust jacket.
> > >
> > >I see no ring on the UK dust jacket.
> >
> > The Ring's invisible.
>
> Do I need my Command Voldemort Decoder contacts?
Ok, just found my Commander Voldemort Decoder contacts. Got them on
sale at WalMart. I do see the ring now. I also see Harry wearing an
invisible headband that says "IMA HORCRUX", with a Nike symbol on it.
Damn.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281568 ] |
Fr, 09 Juni 2006 01:56 |
|
duh wrote:
> duh wrote:
>
>>Toon wrote:
>>
>>>On 7 Jun 2006 12:48:16 -0700, "duh" <nodamnspamok [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>duh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>Actually I was going by the ring portrayed on the dust jacket of the
>>>>>>hard cover edition. While not canon, I don't think the ring with the
>>>>>>lightning bolt crack on it escaped JKR attention.
>>>>>
>>>>>I see no ring at all on the U.S. dust jacket.
>>>>
>>>>I see no ring on the UK dust jacket.
>>>
>>>The Ring's invisible.
>>
>>Do I need my Command Voldemort Decoder contacts?
>
>
> Ok, just found my Commander Voldemort Decoder contacts. Got them on
> sale at WalMart. I do see the ring now. I also see Harry wearing an
> invisible headband that says "IMA HORCRUX", with a Nike symbol on it.
>
> Damn.
>
Well - then according to normal procedure here then - Harry is not a
Horcrux - the headband is one.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281569 ] |
Fr, 09 Juni 2006 02:08 |
|
Thom Madura wrote:
> duh wrote:
>
>> duh wrote:
>>
>>> Toon wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 7 Jun 2006 12:48:16 -0700, "duh" <nodamnspamok [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> duh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Actually I was going by the ring portrayed on the dust jacket of the
>>>>>>> hard cover edition. While not canon, I don't think the ring with the
>>>>>>> lightning bolt crack on it escaped JKR attention.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I see no ring at all on the U.S. dust jacket.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I see no ring on the UK dust jacket.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The Ring's invisible.
>>>
>>>
>>> Do I need my Command Voldemort Decoder contacts?
>>
>>
>>
>> Ok, just found my Commander Voldemort Decoder contacts. Got them on
>> sale at WalMart. I do see the ring now. I also see Harry wearing an
>> invisible headband that says "IMA HORCRUX", with a Nike symbol on it.
>>
>> Damn.
>>
>
> Well - then according to normal procedure here then - Harry is not a
> Horcrux - the headband is one.
You're sharp.
--
-------------------------
"Work like no one is watching,
Dance like you've never been hurt, and
Love like you don't need the money"
\
=8{B
\
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281586 ] |
Fr, 09 Juni 2006 06:53 |
|
On 8 Jun 2006 15:08:41 -0700, "duh" <nodamnspamok [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>Toon wrote:
>> On 7 Jun 2006 12:48:16 -0700, "duh" <nodamnspamok [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >duh wrote:
>> >> > Actually I was going by the ring portrayed on the dust jacket of the
>> >> > hard cover edition. While not canon, I don't think the ring with the
>> >> > lightning bolt crack on it escaped JKR attention.
>> >>
>> >> I see no ring at all on the U.S. dust jacket.
>> >
>> >I see no ring on the UK dust jacket.
>>
>> The Ring's invisible.
>
>Do I need my Command Voldemort Decoder contacts?
Nah, just a lava pit.
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281601 ] |
Fr, 09 Juni 2006 10:02 |
|
duh wrote:
> Toon wrote:
> > On 7 Jun 2006 12:48:16 -0700, "duh" <nodamnspamok [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >duh wrote:
> > >> > Actually I was going by the ring portrayed on the dust jacket of the
> > >> > hard cover edition. While not canon, I don't think the ring with the
> > >> > lightning bolt crack on it escaped JKR attention.
> > >>
> > >> I see no ring at all on the U.S. dust jacket.
> > >
> > >I see no ring on the UK dust jacket.
> >
> > The Ring's invisible.
>
> Do I need my Command Voldemort Decoder contacts?
Or perhaps you people went cheap and got yourself some pirated copy?
Unless other artwork has been comissioned for sale after the first
edition, the UK version of the book should have a ring on the top most
corner of the spine.
http://i.s8.com.br/images/books/cover/img4/280644.jpg
A closeup image of the ring
http://galleries.pottersprophecy.com/displayimage.php?pid=11 06&fullsize=1
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281638 ] |
Sa, 10 Juni 2006 05:23 |
|
Marco [at] polo.com wrote:
> duh wrote:
>
>>Toon wrote:
>>
>>>On 7 Jun 2006 12:48:16 -0700, "duh" <nodamnspamok [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>duh wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>>Actually I was going by the ring portrayed on the dust jacket of the
>>>>>>hard cover edition. While not canon, I don't think the ring with the
>>>>>>lightning bolt crack on it escaped JKR attention.
>>>>>
>>>>>I see no ring at all on the U.S. dust jacket.
>>>>
>>>>I see no ring on the UK dust jacket.
>>>
>>>The Ring's invisible.
>>
>>Do I need my Command Voldemort Decoder contacts?
>
>
> Or perhaps you people went cheap and got yourself some pirated copy?
>
> Unless other artwork has been comissioned for sale after the first
> edition, the UK version of the book should have a ring on the top most
> corner of the spine.
>
> http://i.s8.com.br/images/books/cover/img4/280644.jpg
>
> A closeup image of the ring
>
> http://galleries.pottersprophecy.com/displayimage.php?pid=11 06&fullsize=1
>
Ah, I could only see the front cover on Amazon.
--
-------------------------
"Work like no one is watching,
Dance like you've never been hurt, and
Love like you don't need the money"
\
=8{B
\
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281665 ] |
Sa, 10 Juni 2006 11:28 |
|
In article <1149840153.204918.224550 [at] i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
Marco [at] polo.com <motormaroon [at] gmail.com> wrote:
>> >"duh" <nodamnspamok [at] yahoo.com> wrote:
>> > >duh wrote:
>> > >> > Actually I was going by the ring portrayed on the dust jacket of
>> > >> > the hard cover edition. While not canon, I don't think the ring
>> > >> > with the lightning bolt crack on it escaped JKR attention.
>> > >>
>> > >> I see no ring at all on the U.S. dust jacket.
>> > >I see no ring on the UK dust jacket.
>Or perhaps you people went cheap and got yourself some pirated copy?
>
>Unless other artwork has been comissioned for sale after the first
>edition, the UK version of the book should have a ring on the top most
>corner of the spine.
>
>http://i.s8.com.br/images/books/cover/img4/280644.jpg
>
>A closeup image of the ring
>
> http://galleries.pottersprophecy.com/displayimage.php?pid=11 06&fullsize=1
It's on the Canadian version as well.
But the author almost never has anything to do with the cover picture.
=Tamar
|
|
|
| Re: Harry is a horcrux [message #281668 ] |
Sa, 10 Juni 2006 13:09 |
|
Kish wrote:
> Taunto wrote:
> > I think Voldemort accidently transferred part of his soul to Harry when
> > he tried to kill him, making Harry a horcrux, which should generate some
> > very interesting plot turns and dilemmas on how to kill Voldemort.
I agree! here's how i think it might have happened:
1. V kills lily causing a new rip in his soul
2. V sends AK on harry and the moment it hits harry, V sets about doing
the horcrux creating spell.
3. V has magically taken his soulbit out of himself (not realising it
is the soulbit ripped as a result of Lily's murder) and is about to
bind it to the object he brought with him when the rebounded AK hits
him.
4. V loses control of the spell and the soulbit is directed towards
harry instead of the object he intended to make a horcrux.
5. It enters harry and takes up residence alongside harry's own soul,
supplying harry with the traits that the Hat saw in him when it said
that he would do well in Slytherin.
> > Does Harry have to die for Voldemort to die?
i hope not. i think when unhorcrixifing himself harry's scar will
disappear but he won't die.
> > This would explain Harry's "connection" with Voldemort.
yup it sure would
> > Sorry if this has been covered before, but it just dawned on me, and
> > I've never been on this list before.
a few of us have been trying to get people around here to see that
there is a real possiblilty that JKR has planned all along for harry to
be revealed as a horcrux in book7!
> *yells* JANE!
>
> ...this one's yours.
hehe, I guess i've been the most active of them :)
--
Jane Grey
|
|
|
