Sprinkler Systems Uhaul move Lawn care Roses and trees Ford Parts Chrysler Parts Lake Powell New IPod Touch Apps New IPhone Apps IPhone Apps IPad Information IPad Apps Android APPS Android Games APPS Android Systems Android Tablets APPS and Beyond Smartphone Apps Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools Tablet PC Car Sharing Car Leasing Tabler Pc Fly Fishing Toyota Cars Vacation Rentals Stock market NYSE SSE Stock Freight & Shipping News Gluten Lactose Gout My Coupon Life Campgrounds Check Outdoor Kitchen Design and Redoo Bath Remodeling Palm Springs Las Vegas Vacation Tipps Lake Powell Boating Homes for lease Electric and green Car Blog Pearls and diamonds Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
Miscellaneous / Verschiedenes » alt.fan.james-bond » Judi Dench Should Have Been Replaced
Judi Dench Should Have Been Replaced [message #257020] Mi, 03 Mai 2006 22:35
News_Demon  
I have been in support of the decision that Eon have taken with their
approach to CR and after watching the official trailer all I can say is
WOW!!

However the only thing that troubles me is with keeping Judi Dench on a M.

Don`t get me wrong I think she has been BRILLIANT as M and if the films had
continued on in the normal sequence I would be all for her staying, but for
me it just completely screws up any continuity.


I know we are supposed to suspend belief and forget the previous 20 films,
but for me it`s too much with her promoting Bond from a Commander to 007
status, when we all know from Goldeneye that he was a relic from the cold
war and Dench`s M had a predecessor with whom Bond had a reasonably good
relationship.


Apart from this, it looks like a winner and I can`t wait to be queuing up to
watch CR in Leicester Square in November :-)



--
Posted via NewsDemon.com - Premium Uncensored Newsgroup Service
------->>>>>>http://www.NewsDemon.com<<<<<<------
Unlimited Access, Anonymous Accounts, Uncensored Broadband Access
Re: Judi Dench Should Have Been Replaced [message #257022 ] Do, 04 Mai 2006 00:16
Notifier Deamon  
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Re: Judi Dench Should Have Been Replaced [message #257024 ] Do, 04 Mai 2006 00:57
Rich Handley  
Dylan Winslow <dylanw [at] xmission.dot.com> said:
>Actually, Judi Dench is playing a different character from the previous
>Bond movies, but with the same name and job.

Says who?
Re: Judi Dench Should Have Been Replaced [message #257029 ] Do, 04 Mai 2006 10:35
The Shadow  
Dylan Winslow wrote:
> Actually, Judi Dench is playing a different character from the previous
> Bond movies, but with the same name and job.
>



Explain please.
Re: Judi Dench Should Have Been Replaced [message #257031 ] Do, 04 Mai 2006 11:30
Notifier Deamon  
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Re: Judi Dench Should Have Been Replaced [message #261950 ] Do, 04 Mai 2006 13:49
Notifier Deamon  
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Re: Judi Dench Should Have Been Replaced [message #261952 ] Do, 04 Mai 2006 23:05
Derek.A.Johnson  
Especially when you consider that the Bonds are not the most rigorous
of created worlds.
Re: Judi Dench Should Have Been Replaced [message #261953 ] Fr, 05 Mai 2006 01:26
The Shadow  
Neon Knight wrote:
> The Shadow <miehls [at] bright.net> wrote in
> news:NYGdnUKHt_hzIcTZRVn-rw [at] bright.net:
>
>> Dylan Winslow wrote:
>>> Actually, Judi Dench is playing a different character from the
>>> previous Bond movies, but with the same name and job.
>>>
>> Explain please.
>>
> I guess that went right over your head, didn't it? You people aren't too
> bright.




Go find a dictionary and look up the word "sarcasm".
Re: Judi Dench Should Have Been Replaced [message #261954 ] Fr, 05 Mai 2006 01:27
The Shadow  
Dylan Winslow wrote:
> On 2006-05-04 04:35:54 -0400, The Shadow <miehls [at] bright.net> said:
>
>> Explain please.
>
> Sorry. Just a lame joke. This was, I think, the third or fourth time I
> read somebody complaining about her presence in the film based on the
> discontinuity with previous Bond films. I think it's a really, really
> silly criticism.
>




Explain please.
Re: Judi Dench Should Have Been Replaced [message #261978 ] Fr, 05 Mai 2006 22:42
booby  
Yes, do.
Re: Judi Dench Should Have Been Replaced [message #262702 ] Mo, 08 Mai 2006 02:51
ants.bull  
There has NEVER been continuity in the Bond franchise - how can you
explain Maud Adams playing two major bond-girls, or George Lazenby
being in OHMSS and saying "this never happened to the other guy". How
about the 5 different actors playing James Bond or the fact that he
looks 40 but was born like 70-80 years ago.

What about Felix Leiter being played by different actors or Charles
Gray playing Blofeld in DAF and Dikko Henderson in YOLT?

While it may be annoying to you, its pretty hard to pretend that there
has even been anything but a rather miniscule attempt at creating
continuity of plot/storylines in the series.
Re: Judi Dench Should Have Been Replaced [message #266612 ] Mo, 08 Mai 2006 13:06
Notifier Deamon  
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
Re: Judi Dench Should Have Been Replaced [message #266621 ] Mo, 08 Mai 2006 17:14
Derek.A.Johnson  
Brad Whitaker in TLD, and CIA agent Jack Wade in GE and TND.
Vorheriges Thema:screen captures (again)
Nächstes Thema:screen captures
Gehe zu:
  


aktuelle Zeit: Sa Mai 26 05:04:06 CEST 2012

Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,06135 Sekunden
.:: Startseite - Hinweise - Impressum ::.

Powered