| Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256911] |
Di, 02 Mai 2006 00:07 |
|
I have read conflicting reports that the pursuit of the free runner through
the construction site will feature in the pre-credit, but I was given to
understand that the pre-credit would feature the two "00" assassinations
leading into the title sequence featuring Bond's CV.
I hope the desire to have a big action scene up front hasn't made them
consider another lengthy pre-credit like THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH; I thought
that one should have ended with Bond crossing the bridge with the case full
of money and I believe CASINO ROYALE's should end with the B&W sequences.
Much cooler IMO.
--
--Mac
"Does Keith know how Christmas trees are grown?"
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256917 ] |
Di, 02 Mai 2006 01:12 |
|
Mac wrote:
> I have read conflicting reports that the pursuit of the free runner through
> the construction site will feature in the pre-credit, but I was given to
> understand that the pre-credit would feature the two "00" assassinations
> leading into the title sequence featuring Bond's CV.
--- EON may be getting cold feet about having the gunbarrel sequence
take place in a men's toilet - as I said, a bit tacky. They may be
listening to me.
> I hope the desire to have a big action scene up front hasn't made them
> consider another lengthy pre-credit like THE WORLD IS NOT ENOUGH; I thought
> that one should have ended with Bond crossing the bridge with the case full
> of money and I believe CASINO ROYALE's should end with the B&W sequences.
> Much cooler IMO.
--- Admittedly, I like the idea of the B&W scenes and what I saw on the
latest teaser did impress me, quite film noirish. At this point, I
think I probably would prefer CR to be completely in B&W, it'd probably
be more interesting as a result and make Craig look better in it - not
as blond looking.
> --
> --Mac
>
> "Does Keith know how Christmas trees are grown?"
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256920 ] |
Di, 02 Mai 2006 01:37 |
|
WQ wrote:
> --- EON may be getting cold feet about having the gunbarrel sequence
> take place in a men's toilet - as I said, a bit tacky. They may be
> listening to me.
Uh, yeeahhh,,,,, that's probably it.....
--
Barry King
--
"The man who does not read good books has no advantage over the man
who cannot read them."
-Mark Twain
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256925 ] |
Di, 02 Mai 2006 02:01 |
|
"Barry King" <byron.king [at] mci.com> said:
>WQ wrote:
>> --- EON may be getting cold feet about having the gunbarrel sequence
>> take place in a men's toilet - as I said, a bit tacky. They may be
>> listening to me.
>Uh, yeeahhh,,,,, that's probably it.....
LOL!
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256936 ] |
Di, 02 Mai 2006 08:55 |
|
WQ wrote:
> --- EON may be getting cold feet about having the gunbarrel sequence
> take place in a men's toilet - as I said, a bit tacky. They may be
> listening to me.
>
It's in the teaser, you moron.
>
> --- Admittedly, I like the idea of the B&W scenes and what I saw on the
> latest teaser did impress me, quite film noirish. At this point, I
> think I probably would prefer CR to be completely in B&W, it'd probably
> be more interesting as a result and make Craig look better in it - not
> as blond looking.
>
Turn the color off on your monitor. Then turn off the picture and the
sound. Then go away.
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256946 ] |
Di, 02 Mai 2006 16:48 |
|
WQ wrote:
> Mac wrote:
>> I have read conflicting reports that the pursuit of the free runner
>> through the construction site will feature in the pre-credit, but I
>> was given to understand that the pre-credit would feature the two
>> "00" assassinations leading into the title sequence featuring Bond's
>> CV.
>
> --- EON may be getting cold feet about having the gunbarrel sequence
> take place in a men's toilet - as I said, a bit tacky. They may be
> listening to me.
Er.. why? It's still in the film.
--
--Mac
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256947 ] |
Di, 02 Mai 2006 16:51 |
|
Barry King wrote:
> WQ wrote:
>
>> --- EON may be getting cold feet about having the gunbarrel sequence
>> take place in a men's toilet - as I said, a bit tacky. They may be
>> listening to me.
>
> Uh, yeeahhh,,,,, that's probably it.....
LOL! I'm wondering if the amount of people still listening to him could be
counted on Tee Hee's fingers...
--
--Mac
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256953 ] |
Di, 02 Mai 2006 18:33 |
|
Mac wrote:
> WQ wrote:
>
> > Mac wrote:
> >> I have read conflicting reports that the pursuit of the free runner
> >> through the construction site will feature in the pre-credit, but I
> >> was given to understand that the pre-credit would feature the two
> >> "00" assassinations leading into the title sequence featuring Bond's
> >> CV.
> >
> > --- EON may be getting cold feet about having the gunbarrel sequence
> > take place in a men's toilet - as I said, a bit tacky. They may be
> > listening to me.
>
> Er.. why? It's still in the film.
--- My take on what you bring up is that maybe EON is having doubts
about using a toilet gunbarrel intro. Sure, the toilet scene will
still be in the film, but maybe not to lead into the gunbarrel
sequence. Maybe they're thinking, as they very well should be, of
another and more clever way of introducing the gunbarrel shot.
> --
> --Mac
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256954 ] |
Di, 02 Mai 2006 18:35 |
|
Mac wrote:
> WQ wrote:
>
> > Mac wrote:
> >> I have read conflicting reports that the pursuit of the free runner
> >> through the construction site will feature in the pre-credit, but I
> >> was given to understand that the pre-credit would feature the two
> >> "00" assassinations leading into the title sequence featuring Bond's
> >> CV.
> >
> > --- EON may be getting cold feet about having the gunbarrel sequence
> > take place in a men's toilet - as I said, a bit tacky. They may be
> > listening to me.
>
> Er.. why? It's still in the film.
--- The supposed original "00" assasinations would lead into the toilet
scene gunbarrel sequenece. That's the tacky part. Maybe they're
thinking of another better way to into the gunbarrel sequence and the
free runner chase could be it. That's what I was referring to.
> --
> --Mac
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256956 ] |
Di, 02 Mai 2006 19:48 |
|
WQ wrote:
>
> --- My take on what you bring up is that maybe EON is having doubts
> about using a toilet gunbarrel intro. Sure, the toilet scene will
> still be in the film, but maybe not to lead into the gunbarrel
> sequence. Maybe they're thinking, as they very well should be, of
> another and more clever way of introducing the gunbarrel shot.
>
IT'S IN THE TEASER WITH THE GUNBARREL, YOU FRIGGIN' DOPE!!!
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256961 ] |
Di, 02 Mai 2006 23:23 |
|
"WQ" <wq [at] email.com> said:
>Maybe they're thinking, as they very well should be, of
>another and more clever way of introducing the gunbarrel shot.
Aimed at you?
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256962 ] |
Di, 02 Mai 2006 23:23 |
|
"JHause" <JHause [at] aol.com> said:
>IT'S IN THE TEASER WITH THE GUNBARREL, YOU FRIGGIN' DOPE!!!
1) The teaser has already been denounced as unofficial.
2) Calm down, for crying out loud. It's just a discussion.
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256964 ] |
Di, 02 Mai 2006 23:24 |
|
WQ wrote:
> --- The supposed original "00" assasinations would lead into the
> toilet scene gunbarrel sequenece. That's the tacky part. Maybe
> they're thinking of another better way to into the gunbarrel sequence
> and the free runner chase could be it.
I'm willing to bet they're not. It's not tacky. Certainly not as
tacky as Sean Connery embarrassingly landing on the crapper
in the faithful my arse DIAMONDS ARE FOREVER. I was postulating
that they may be looking to up the action quotient in the
pre-credit because it's become de rigueur rather than returning
to the minimalist approach of the early films.
--
--Mac
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256966 ] |
Di, 02 Mai 2006 23:40 |
|
>WQ wrote:
>
>> --- EON may be getting cold feet about having the gunbarrel sequence
>> take place in a men's toilet - as I said, a bit tacky. They may be
>> listening to me.
>
It's certainly more than anyone else doing!!
Sometimes I wonder what the point of killfiling people is. I still get
to read his drivel from everyones constant replying to him.
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256967 ] |
Di, 02 Mai 2006 23:42 |
|
"Rich Handley" <rhandley [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
news:1ejf5254ddsu87fg8s8b29a3ghrldrbod2 [at] 4ax.com...
> "JHause" <JHause [at] aol.com> said:
>>IT'S IN THE TEASER WITH THE GUNBARREL, YOU FRIGGIN' DOPE!!!
>
>
> 1) The teaser has already been denounced as unofficial.
Except it's not...
--
Redemption 07 - B5 B7 and Beyond, 23-25 February 2007.
http://www.smof.com/redemption
"A Revolution without dancing isn't worth having." [V]
Book At Bedtime: The Bourne Ultimatum (Robert Ludlum)
http://lonemagpie.livejournal.com
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256972 ] |
Mi, 03 Mai 2006 00:35 |
|
Rhino wrote:
> >WQ wrote:
> >
> >> --- EON may be getting cold feet about having the gunbarrel sequence
> >> take place in a men's toilet - as I said, a bit tacky. They may be
> >> listening to me.
> >
>
> It's certainly more than anyone else doing!!
>
> Sometimes I wonder what the point of killfiling people is. I still get
> to read his drivel from everyones constant replying to him.
--- Guess you can call me the free runner of the newsgroup.
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256974 ] |
Mi, 03 Mai 2006 00:41 |
|
Rich Handley wrote:
> "WQ" <wq [at] email.com> said:
> >Maybe they're thinking, as they very well should be, of
> >another and more clever way of introducing the gunbarrel shot.
>
> Aimed at you?
--- Ummmm.... lemme see. Joke? Right?
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256989 ] |
Mi, 03 Mai 2006 08:10 |
|
WQ wrote:
>
> --- Guess you can call me the free runner of the newsgroup.
The brain-free runner of the newsgroup.
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256990 ] |
Mi, 03 Mai 2006 08:12 |
|
WQ wrote:
> Rich Handley wrote:
> > "WQ" <wq [at] email.com> said:
> > >Maybe they're thinking, as they very well should be, of
> > >another and more clever way of introducing the gunbarrel shot.
> >
> > Aimed at you?
>
> --- Ummmm.... lemme see. Joke? Right?
Yes. You're a joke.
|
|
|
| Re: Pre-credit (Spoilers) [message #256996 ] |
Mi, 03 Mai 2006 13:26 |
|
"WQ" <wq [at] email.com> said:
>Rich Handley wrote:
>> "WQ" <wq [at] email.com> said:
>> >Maybe they're thinking, as they very well should be, of
>> >another and more clever way of introducing the gunbarrel shot.
>> Aimed at you?
>--- Ummmm.... lemme see. Joke? Right?
Yes, entirely. Sorry, couldn't resist. :)
|
|
|
