Sprinkler Systems Uhaul move Lawn care Roses and trees Ford Parts Chrysler Parts Lake Powell New IPod Touch Apps New IPhone Apps IPhone Apps IPad Information IPad Apps Android APPS Android Games APPS Android Systems Android Tablets APPS and Beyond Smartphone Apps Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools Tablet PC Car Sharing Car Leasing Tabler Pc Fly Fishing Toyota Cars Vacation Rentals Stock market NYSE SSE Stock Freight & Shipping News Gluten Lactose Gout My Coupon Life Campgrounds Check Outdoor Kitchen Design and Redoo Bath Remodeling Palm Springs Las Vegas Vacation Tipps Lake Powell Boating Homes for lease Electric and green Car Blog Pearls and diamonds Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
Reader


[Suche]  [Administrator]  [Hinweise zum Reader]  [Startseite]
Fantasy » alt.fan.harry-potter » Status Check
Status Check [message #245741] Fr, 07 April 2006 21:09
Chip Stobb  
So here is where we are now:

Dumbledore explains to Harry what a horcrux is (a portion of one's
soul) and that it takes a killing/murder to be able to produce a
horcrux;

Dumbledore and Harry discuss the possible list of horcruxes that
Voldemort may have created. They agree that Voldy may have created up
to seven horcruxes, and that these portions of Voldy's soul are most
likely held in objects that had significance to Voldemort. As Voldy
held the founders of Hogwarts in high esteem it is likely that the
objects that hold pieces of Voldy's soul are resting in relics left by
the founders of Hogwarts... and maybe in Hogwarts itself.

FYI - The ring of Slytherin which was a horcrux that Dumbledore
neutralized (and maybe suffered his withered hand in the process) was
a powerful relic of one of the founders.

Dumbledore and Harry agree that one of these relics was the diary of
Tom Riddle which Harry found and destroyed in Book 2.

In Book 6 (the Half Blood Prince) Harry and Dumbledore returned from a
journey to wipe out a horcrux of Voldemort's, only to find out that
someone with the initials AB beat them to it (and AB expects to be
dead by the time that Voldy discovers the horcrux has been
eliminated);

Snape has revealed his true colors by killing Dumbledore, thus
aligning himself with Voldemort;

Draco Malfoy was under orders from Voldemort to kill Dumbledore but
failed and Snape stepped in to finish the job - at the same time
completing his 'unbreakable' vow to Draco's mother;

Before Dumbledore is killed by Snape, he and Harry talk about the
horcruxes. There are the relics of Hufflepuff and Ravenclaw which
have yet to be revealed (did they fall into the hands of Tom Riddle?)
and the only 'known' relic of Gryffendor is the sword - which resides
in the office of the headmaster/headmistress of Hogwarts.


Let's approach this like CSI - looking at the evidence that is
available to us.

Grissom: What else do we have to bring to this crime scene?
Re: Status Check [message #245745 ] Fr, 07 April 2006 22:08
Ken  
Chip Stobb wrote:
> So here is where we are now:
>
> Dumbledore explains to Harry what a horcrux is (a portion of one's
> soul) and that it takes a killing/murder to be able to produce a
> horcrux;
>
> Dumbledore and Harry discuss the possible list of horcruxes that
> Voldemort may have created. They agree that Voldy may have created up
> to seven horcruxes, and that these portions of Voldy's soul are most
> likely held in objects that had significance to Voldemort. As Voldy
> held the founders of Hogwarts in high esteem it is likely that the
> objects that hold pieces of Voldy's soul are resting in relics left by
> the founders of Hogwarts... and maybe in Hogwarts itself.
>
> FYI - The ring of Slytherin which was a horcrux that Dumbledore
> neutralized (and maybe suffered his withered hand in the process) was
> a powerful relic of one of the founders.
>
> Dumbledore and Harry agree that one of these relics was the diary of
> Tom Riddle which Harry found and destroyed in Book 2.
>
> In Book 6 (the Half Blood Prince) Harry and Dumbledore returned from a
> journey to wipe out a horcrux of Voldemort's, only to find out that
> someone with the initials AB beat them to it (and AB expects to be
> dead by the time that Voldy discovers the horcrux has been
> eliminated);

*Minor point*... initials RAB

>
> Snape has revealed his true colors by killing Dumbledore, thus
> aligning himself with Voldemort;

*Major point*... at last count most people in this group disagree or in any
case many disagree.

>
> Draco Malfoy was under orders from Voldemort to kill Dumbledore but
> failed and Snape stepped in to finish the job - at the same time
> completing his 'unbreakable' vow to Draco's mother;
>
> Before Dumbledore is killed by Snape, he and Harry talk about the
> horcruxes. There are the relics of Hufflepuff and Ravenclaw which
> have yet to be revealed (did they fall into the hands of Tom Riddle?)
> and the only 'known' relic of Gryffendor is the sword - which resides
> in the office of the headmaster/headmistress of Hogwarts.
>

*Medium point*... the sorting hat is also a known relic of Gryffendor but
Rowling has already said that it's not an Horcrux.

>
> Let's approach this like CSI - looking at the evidence that is
> available to us.
>
> Grissom: What else do we have to bring to this crime scene?
Re: Status Check [message #245751 ] Fr, 07 April 2006 22:38
Kish  
Here in Minnesota wrote:
> Chip Stobb wrote:
>
>>So here is where we are now:
>>
>>Dumbledore explains to Harry what a horcrux is (a portion of one's
>>soul) and that it takes a killing/murder to be able to produce a
>>horcrux;
>>
>>Dumbledore and Harry discuss the possible list of horcruxes that
>>Voldemort may have created. They agree that Voldy may have created up
>>to seven horcruxes,

Point of uncertain size: They agree that he created exactly six Horcruxes.

and that these portions of Voldy's soul are most
>>likely held in objects that had significance to Voldemort. As Voldy
>>held the founders of Hogwarts in high esteem it is likely that the
>>objects that hold pieces of Voldy's soul are resting in relics left by
>>the founders of Hogwarts... and maybe in Hogwarts itself.
>>
>>FYI - The ring of Slytherin which was a horcrux that Dumbledore
>>neutralized (and maybe suffered his withered hand in the process) was
>>a powerful relic of one of the founders.
>>
>>Dumbledore and Harry agree that one of these relics was the diary of
>>Tom Riddle which Harry found and destroyed in Book 2.
>>
>>In Book 6 (the Half Blood Prince) Harry and Dumbledore returned from a
>>journey to wipe out a horcrux of Voldemort's, only to find out that
>>someone with the initials AB beat them to it (and AB expects to be
>>dead by the time that Voldy discovers the horcrux has been
>>eliminated);
>
>
> *Minor point*... initials RAB
>
>
>>Snape has revealed his true colors by killing Dumbledore, thus
>>aligning himself with Voldemort;
>
>
> *Major point*... at last count most people in this group disagree or in any
> case many disagree.
>
>
>>Draco Malfoy was under orders from Voldemort to kill Dumbledore but
>>failed and Snape stepped in to finish the job - at the same time
>>completing his 'unbreakable' vow to Draco's mother;
>>
>>Before Dumbledore is killed by Snape, he and Harry talk about the
>>horcruxes. There are the relics of Hufflepuff and Ravenclaw which
>>have yet to be revealed (did they fall into the hands of Tom Riddle?)
>>and the only 'known' relic of Gryffendor is the sword - which resides
>>in the office of the headmaster/headmistress of Hogwarts.
>>
>
>
> *Medium point*... the sorting hat is also a known relic of Gryffendor but
> Rowling has already said that it's not an Horcrux.
>
>
>>Let's approach this like CSI - looking at the evidence that is
>>available to us.
>>
>>Grissom: What else do we have to bring to this crime scene?
>
>
>
Re: Status Check [message #245754 ] Fr, 07 April 2006 23:07
Lady Grey  
Chip Stobb wrote:
> So here is where we are now:
>
> Dumbledore explains to Harry what a horcrux is (a portion of one's
> soul) and that it takes a killing/murder to be able to produce a
> horcrux;
>
> Dumbledore and Harry discuss the possible list of horcruxes that
> Voldemort may have created. They agree that Voldy may have created up
> to seven horcruxes, and that these portions of Voldy's soul are most

six horcruxes. Dumbledore speculates that LV wanted his soul in 7
pieces, therefore he would have wanted 6 horcruxes.

<snip>
> In Book 6 (the Half Blood Prince) Harry and Dumbledore returned from a
> journey to wipe out a horcrux of Voldemort's, only to find out that
> someone with the initials AB beat them to it (and AB expects to be
> dead by the time that Voldy discovers the horcrux has been
> eliminated);

RAB, most likely Sirius' dead little brother.

> Snape has revealed his true colors by killing Dumbledore, thus
> aligning himself with Voldemort;

well that's debatable. But that is certainly what JKR wants us to
think.

<snip>
> Before Dumbledore is killed by Snape, he and Harry talk about the
> horcruxes. There are the relics of Hufflepuff and Ravenclaw which
> have yet to be revealed (did they fall into the hands of Tom Riddle?)
> and the only 'known' relic of Gryffendor is the sword - which resides
> in the office of the headmaster/headmistress of Hogwarts.
>
> Let's approach this like CSI - looking at the evidence that is
> available to us.
>
> Grissom: What else do we have to bring to this crime scene?

Well Godric's Hollow could have had a Gryffindor relic in it, but then
you could think AD would have known about it. Someone suggested and i
agree that Ravenclaw's tiara is a strong possibility -it was in the
possession of Molly's great aunt Muriel because Molly's maiden name is
Prewett and the Black family showed the Prewett crest had a raven.

--
Jane Grey
Re: Status Check [message #245758 ] Fr, 07 April 2006 23:32
Kami  
Chip Stobb wrote:

> Before Dumbledore is killed by Snape, he and Harry talk about the
> horcruxes. There are the relics of Hufflepuff and Ravenclaw which
> have yet to be revealed (did they fall into the hands of Tom Riddle?)
> and the only 'known' relic of Gryffendor is the sword - which resides
> in the office of the headmaster/headmistress of Hogwarts.

JKR has revealed that Tom Riddle stole one of Hufflepuff's known relics
- the golden cup with the badger engraved upon it. (HBP, Ch. 20 - Lord
Voldemort's Request, pg. 438)
Re: Status Check [message #245830 ] Sa, 08 April 2006 14:17
Toon  
On Fri, 07 Apr 2006 15:09:36 -0400, Chip Stobb <stobb [at] usa.com> wrote:

>So here is where we are now:
>
>Dumbledore explains to Harry what a horcrux is (a portion of one's
>soul) and that it takes a killing/murder to be able to produce a
>horcrux;

Well, Slughorn did.


>In Book 6 (the Half Blood Prince) Harry and Dumbledore returned from a
>journey to wipe out a horcrux of Voldemort's, only to find out that
>someone with the initials AB beat them to it (and AB expects to be
>dead by the time that Voldy discovers the horcrux has been
>eliminated);

AHHH! I'm seeing imaginary R's in front of initials. AHHHH!

>Snape has revealed his true colors by killing Dumbledore, thus
>aligning himself with Voldemort;

Sucker. I can't believe you fell for that.


>
>Let's approach this like CSI - looking at the evidence that is
>available to us.
>
>Grissom: What else do we have to bring to this crime scene?

Accurate info. You missed the R in RAB. You're too convinced of
Snape's betrayal. You're not considering Nagini.
Re: Status Check [message #247679 ] Fr, 14 April 2006 04:37
Mishagam  
>
>>Snape has revealed his true colors by killing Dumbledore, thus
>>aligning himself with Voldemort;
>
>
> Sucker. I can't believe you fell for that.
>
I don't know what this newsgroup thinks, but I am 99.9% sure that DD is
really dead. Rowling wrote that in such books you have to kill people
like DD to leave Harry alone in final book. Also, if DD isn't really
dead - why Sirius can be really dead and never mentioned in book 6? I
would bet at rate 10:1 that DD is dead if such bet could be arranged.

I am also 95% sure that Snape really killed DD (and meant to kill him,
not to do something 'good') - through I am not so sure that Snape will
not play some positive role in Book 7. But even evil people can play
positive role in right circumstances.
Re: Status Check [message #247700 ] Fr, 14 April 2006 17:47
Ken  
Mishagam wrote:
>>> Snape has revealed his true colors by killing Dumbledore, thus
>>> aligning himself with Voldemort;
>>
>>
>> Sucker. I can't believe you fell for that.
>>
> I don't know what this newsgroup thinks, but I am 99.9% sure that DD
> is really dead. Rowling wrote that in such books you have to kill
> people like DD to leave Harry alone in final book. Also, if DD isn't
> really dead - why Sirius can be really dead and never mentioned in
> book 6? I would bet at rate 10:1 that DD is dead if such bet could be
> arranged.
> I am also 95% sure that Snape really killed DD (and meant to kill him,
> not to do something 'good') - through I am not so sure that Snape will
> not play some positive role in Book 7. But even evil people can play
> positive role in right circumstances.

Most people in this newsgroup thinks that DD is really dead and that Snape
really killed him.

The "divide" is whether Snape is evil.

1. Snape is evil because he killed DD because he is either on LV side or his
own.

2. Snape is not evil. Snape kill DD because DD ordered him to... most likely
so Snape would not have to break the unbreakable vow.

There was someone who is doing a great job of keeping track but I think it's
been 60 to 75 percent "Snape is not evil".

Ken
Re: Status Check [message #247710 ] Fr, 14 April 2006 18:49
Kish  
Here in Minnesota wrote:
End-spoilers for HBP.




20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

9

8

7

6

5

4

3

2

1


> Most people in this newsgroup thinks that DD is really dead and that Snape
> really killed him.
>
> The "divide" is whether Snape is evil.

Erm. No. The divide is whether Snape is Dumbledore's man or
Voldemort's. I, for example, consider the way he treats students to
qualify him for thoroughly evil, but I think he's probably an evil that
serves Dumbledore.
Re: Status Check [message #247735 ] Fr, 14 April 2006 21:56
Ken  
Kish wrote:
> Here in Minnesota wrote:
> End-spoilers for HBP.

>
> 10
>
> 9
>
> 8
>
> 7
>
> 6
>
> 5
>
> 4
>
> 3
>
> 2
>
> 1
>
>
>> Most people in this newsgroup thinks that DD is really dead and that
>> Snape really killed him.
>>
>> The "divide" is whether Snape is evil.
>
> Erm. No. The divide is whether Snape is Dumbledore's man or
> Voldemort's. I, for example, consider the way he treats students to
> qualify him for thoroughly evil, but I think he's probably an evil
> that serves Dumbledore.

If you define evil as being a jerk I think 100% would say that Snape is
evil.

Ken
Re: Status Check [message #247736 ] Fr, 14 April 2006 22:47
Kish  
Here in Minnesota wrote:
> Kish wrote:
>
>>Here in Minnesota wrote:
>>End-spoilers for HBP.
>
>
>>10
>>
>>9
>>
>>8
>>
>>7
>>
>>6
>>
>>5
>>
>>4
>>
>>3
>>
>>2
>>
>>1
>>
>>
>>
>>>Most people in this newsgroup thinks that DD is really dead and that
>>>Snape really killed him.
>>>
>>>The "divide" is whether Snape is evil.
>>
>>Erm. No. The divide is whether Snape is Dumbledore's man or
>>Voldemort's. I, for example, consider the way he treats students to
>>qualify him for thoroughly evil, but I think he's probably an evil
>>that serves Dumbledore.
>
>
> If you define evil as being a jerk I think 100% would say that Snape is
> evil.

Not even then, but it's moot. I think very few people would define
merely "being a jerk" as evil.

More, however, would define "being a sadistic bully who abuses children
for fun" as evil.
Re: Status Check [message #247741 ] Fr, 14 April 2006 23:45
Lady Grey  
Here in Minnesota wrote:
<snip>
> If you define evil as being a jerk I think 100% would say that Snape is
> evil.

you would be surprised, there are some who think that Snape has a heart
of gold and only has to pretend to be mean in order to keep the
Sytherin kiddies (and therefore their parents) sweet. If JKR did this,
I would burn the books.

--
Jane Grey
Re: Status Check [message #247776 ] Sa, 15 April 2006 05:27
Ken  
Jane Grey wrote:
> Here in Minnesota wrote:
> <snip>
>> If you define evil as being a jerk I think 100% would say that Snape
>> is evil.
>
> you would be surprised, there are some who think that Snape has a
> heart of gold and only has to pretend to be mean in order to keep the
> Sytherin kiddies (and therefore their parents) sweet. If JKR did this,
> I would burn the books.

I actually think that *some* of Snape jerk-ness is an act.

Ken
Re: Snape: evil or not evil? [message #252863 ] Mi, 19 April 2006 03:39
Blon Fel Fotch Passam  
Here in Minnesota wrote:

> Most people in this newsgroup thinks that DD is really dead and that Snape
> really killed him. The "divide" is whether Snape is evil.

> 1. Snape is evil because he killed DD because he is either on LV side or
> his own.

> 2. Snape is not evil. Snape kill DD because DD ordered him to... most
> likely so Snape would not have to break the unbreakable vow.

> There was someone who is doing a great job of keeping track

Thanks!


> I think it's been 60 to 75 percent "Snape is not evil".

The present tally is 83 percent.


Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen

--
Free Margaret Blaine now!
Re: Snape: evil or not evil? [message #252874 ] Mi, 19 April 2006 05:42
richard e white  
Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:

> Here in Minnesota wrote:
>
> > Most people in this newsgroup thinks that DD is really dead and that Snape
> > really killed him. The "divide" is whether Snape is evil.
>
> > 1. Snape is evil because he killed DD because he is either on LV side or
> > his own.
>
> > 2. Snape is not evil. Snape kill DD because DD ordered him to... most
> > likely so Snape would not have to break the unbreakable vow.
>
> > There was someone who is doing a great job of keeping track
>
> Thanks!
>
> > I think it's been 60 to 75 percent "Snape is not evil".
>
> The present tally is 83 percent.
>
> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen
>
> --
> Free Margaret Blaine now!

What is the percent of people that think snape is on his own side?
Is it the same that think snape is evil?

--
Richard The Blind Typer
Lets Hear It For Talking Computers.
Re: Snape: evil or not evil? [message #253004 ] Fr, 21 April 2006 13:06
Blon Fel Fotch Passam  
Richard E. White wrote:

> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:

>> Here in Minnesota wrote:

>>> There was someone who is doing a great job of keeping track

>> Thanks!

>>> I think it's been 60 to 75 percent "Snape is not evil".

>> The present tally is 83 percent.

> What is the percent of people that think snape is on his own side?

I don't know.


> Is it the same that think snape is evil?

No, it's not, which is why I delineated the issue.


Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen

--
Free Margaret Blaine now!
Re: Snape: evil or not evil? [message #253052 ] Sa, 22 April 2006 01:00
wadkin2000  
Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
> Richard E. White wrote:
>
> > Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
>
> >> Here in Minnesota wrote:
>
> >>> There was someone who is doing a great job of keeping track
>
> >> Thanks!
>
> >>> I think it's been 60 to 75 percent "Snape is not evil".
>
> >> The present tally is 83 percent.
>
> > What is the percent of people that think snape is on his own side?
>
> I don't know.
>
>
> > Is it the same that think snape is evil?
>
> No, it's not, which is why I delineated the issue.
>
>
> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen
>
> --
> Free Margaret Blaine now!

Blon, just as an fyi, Hpana.com's survey "evil or not" is running
67%-32% in favor of "not".
Re: Snape: evil or not evil? [message #253298 ] Mi, 26 April 2006 01:38
Blon Fel Fotch Passam  
Cassie wrote:

> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:

>> Richard E. White wrote:

>>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:

>>>> Here in Minnesota wrote:

>>>>> There was someone who is doing a great job of keeping track

>>>> Thanks!

>>>>> I think it's been 60 to 75 percent "Snape is not evil".

>>>> The present tally is 83 percent.

>>> What is the percent of people that think snape is on his own side?

>> I don't know.

>>> Is it the same that think snape is evil?

>> No, it's not, which is why I delineated the issue.

> Blon, just as an fyi, Hpana.com's survey "evil or not" is running
> 67%-32% in favor of "not".

Thanks Cassie, that's very interesting.

Did Hpana.com ever survey the age range of their readers?


Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen

--
Free Margaret Blaine now!
Re: Snape: evil or not evil? [message #253306 ] Mi, 26 April 2006 03:43
wadkin2000  
Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
> Cassie wrote:
>
> > Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
>
> >> Richard E. White wrote:
>
> >>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
>
> >>>> Here in Minnesota wrote:
>
> >>>>> There was someone who is doing a great job of keeping track
>
> >>>> Thanks!
>
> >>>>> I think it's been 60 to 75 percent "Snape is not evil".
>
> >>>> The present tally is 83 percent.
>
> >>> What is the percent of people that think snape is on his own side?
>
> >> I don't know.
>
> >>> Is it the same that think snape is evil?
>
> >> No, it's not, which is why I delineated the issue.
>
> > Blon, just as an fyi, Hpana.com's survey "evil or not" is running
> > 67%-32% in favor of "not".
>
> Thanks Cassie, that's very interesting.
>
> Did Hpana.com ever survey the age range of their readers?
>
>
> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen
>
> --
> Free Margaret Blaine now!

As far as I know, they didn't. Just as my own opinion, though, from
reading some of the posts, I get the feeling that the majority of their
forum might be younger than the people on afhp.
Re: Snape: evil or not evil? [message #253577 ] Sa, 29 April 2006 01:21
Blon Fel Fotch Passam  
Cassie wrote:

> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:

>> Cassie wrote:

>>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:

>>>> Richard E. White wrote:

>>>>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:

>>>>>> Here in Minnesota wrote:

>>>>>>> There was someone who is doing a great job of keeping track

>>>>>> Thanks!

>>>>>>> I think it's been 60 to 75 percent "Snape is not evil".

>>>>>> The present tally is 83 percent.

>>>>> What is the percent of people that think snape is on his own side?

>>>> I don't know.

>>>>> Is it the same that think snape is evil?

>>>> No, it's not, which is why I delineated the issue.

>>> Blon, just as an fyi, Hpana.com's survey "evil or not" is running
>>> 67%-32% in favor of "not".

>> Thanks Cassie, that's very interesting.

>> Did Hpana.com ever survey the age range of their readers?

> As far as I know, they didn't. Just as my own opinion, though, from
> reading some of the posts, I get the feeling that the majority of their
> forum might be younger than the people on afhp.

That might explain the slightly more accepting bias.


Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen

--
Free Margaret Blaine now!
Re: Snape: evil or not evil? [message #253590 ] Sa, 29 April 2006 01:55
wadkin2000  
Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
> Cassie wrote:
>
> > Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
>
> >> Cassie wrote:
>
> >>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
>
> >>>> Richard E. White wrote:
>
> >>>>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Here in Minnesota wrote:
>
> >>>>>>> There was someone who is doing a great job of keeping track
>
> >>>>>> Thanks!
>
> >>>>>>> I think it's been 60 to 75 percent "Snape is not evil".
>
> >>>>>> The present tally is 83 percent.
>
> >>>>> What is the percent of people that think snape is on his own side?
>
> >>>> I don't know.
>
> >>>>> Is it the same that think snape is evil?
>
> >>>> No, it's not, which is why I delineated the issue.
>
> >>> Blon, just as an fyi, Hpana.com's survey "evil or not" is running
> >>> 67%-32% in favor of "not".
>
> >> Thanks Cassie, that's very interesting.
>
> >> Did Hpana.com ever survey the age range of their readers?
>
> > As far as I know, they didn't. Just as my own opinion, though, from
> > reading some of the posts, I get the feeling that the majority of their
> > forum might be younger than the people on afhp.
>
> That might explain the slightly more accepting bias.
>
>
> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen
>
> --
> Free Margaret Blaine now!

HaHa! And your point being? :-)
Re: Snape: evil or not evil? [message #253698 ] So, 30 April 2006 10:44
Blon Fel Fotch Passam  
Cassie wrote:

> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
>> Cassie wrote:
>>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
>>>> Cassie wrote:
>>>>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
>>>>>> Richard E. White wrote:
>>>>>>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
>>>>>>>> Here in Minnesota wrote:

>>>>>>>>> There was someone who is doing a great job of keeping track

>>>>>>>> Thanks!

>>>>>>>>> I think it's been 60 to 75 percent "Snape is not evil".

>>>>>>>> The present tally is 83 percent.

>>>>>>> What is the percent of people that think snape is on his own side?

>>>>>> I don't know.

>>>>>>> Is it the same that think snape is evil?

>>>>>> No, it's not, which is why I delineated the issue.

>>>>> Blon, just as an fyi, Hpana.com's survey "evil or not" is running
>>>>> 67%-32% in favor of "not".

>>>> Thanks Cassie, that's very interesting.

>>>> Did Hpana.com ever survey the age range of their readers?

>>> As far as I know, they didn't. Just as my own opinion, though, from
>>> reading some of the posts, I get the feeling that the majority of
>>> their forum might be younger than the people on afhp.

>> That might explain the slightly more accepting bias.

> HaHa! And your point being? :-)

The older people get, the more times they've been deceived in life, so
sadly the less likely they are to accept that things are as they seem,
especially from she whose books are replete with plot twists.


Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen

--
Free Margaret Blaine now!
Re: Snape: evil or not evil? [message #253713 ] So, 30 April 2006 17:03
wadkin2000  
Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
> Cassie wrote:
>
> > Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
> >> Cassie wrote:
> >>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
> >>>> Cassie wrote:
> >>>>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
> >>>>>> Richard E. White wrote:
> >>>>>>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Here in Minnesota wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>> There was someone who is doing a great job of keeping track
>
> >>>>>>>> Thanks!
>
> >>>>>>>>> I think it's been 60 to 75 percent "Snape is not evil".
>
> >>>>>>>> The present tally is 83 percent.
>
> >>>>>>> What is the percent of people that think snape is on his own side?
>
> >>>>>> I don't know.
>
> >>>>>>> Is it the same that think snape is evil?
>
> >>>>>> No, it's not, which is why I delineated the issue.
>
> >>>>> Blon, just as an fyi, Hpana.com's survey "evil or not" is running
> >>>>> 67%-32% in favor of "not".
>
> >>>> Thanks Cassie, that's very interesting.
>
> >>>> Did Hpana.com ever survey the age range of their readers?
>
> >>> As far as I know, they didn't. Just as my own opinion, though, from
> >>> reading some of the posts, I get the feeling that the majority of
> >>> their forum might be younger than the people on afhp.
>
> >> That might explain the slightly more accepting bias.
>
> > HaHa! And your point being? :-)
>
> The older people get, the more times they've been deceived in life, so
> sadly the less likely they are to accept that things are as they seem,
> especially from she whose books are replete with plot twists.
>
>
> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen
>
> --
> Free Margaret Blaine now!


Well, at least we know that some of us (regardless of age) are on the
side of light!
Re: Snape: evil or not evil? [message #253833 ] Mo, 01 Mai 2006 18:56
Blon Fel Fotch Passam  
Cassie wrote:

> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:

>> Cassie wrote:
>>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
>>>> Cassie wrote:
>>>>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
>>>>>> Cassie wrote:
>>>>>>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
>>>>>>>> Richard E. White wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Here in Minnesota wrote:

>>>>>>>>>>> There was someone who is doing a great job of keeping track

>>>>>>>>>> Thanks!

>>>>>>>>>>> I think it's been 60 to 75 percent "Snape is not evil".

>>>>>>>>>> The present tally is 83 percent.

>>>>>>>>> What is the percent of people that think snape is on his own side?

>>>>>>>> I don't know.

>>>>>>>>> Is it the same that think snape is evil?

>>>>>>>> No, it's not, which is why I delineated the issue.

>>>>>>> Blon, just as an fyi, Hpana.com's survey "evil or not" is running
>>>>>>> 67%-32% in favor of "not".

>>>>>> Thanks Cassie, that's very interesting.

>>>>>> Did Hpana.com ever survey the age range of their readers?

>>>>> As far as I know, they didn't. Just as my own opinion, though, from
>>>>> reading some of the posts, I get the feeling that the majority of
>>>>> their forum might be younger than the people on afhp.

>>>> That might explain the slightly more accepting bias.

>>> HaHa! And your point being? :-)

>> The older people get, the more times they've been deceived in life, so
>> sadly the less likely they are to accept that things are as they seem,
>> especially from she whose books are replete with plot twists.

> Well, at least we know that some of us (regardless of age) are on the
> side of light!

I'll drink to that, Cassie!


Blon Fel Fotch Passameer-Day Slitheen

--
Free Margaret Blaine now!
Vorheriges Thema:How modern marriage female is male weak should manage
Nächstes Thema:Prisoner of Azkaban movie
Gehe zu:
  


aktuelle Zeit: Sa Mai 26 00:04:32 CEST 2012

Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 1,79231 Sekunden
.:: Startseite - Hinweise - Impressum ::.

Powered