|
Sprinkler Systems
Uhaul move
Lawn care
Roses and trees
Ford Parts
Chrysler Parts
Lake Powell
New IPod Touch Apps
New IPhone Apps
IPhone Apps
IPad Information
IPad Apps
Android APPS
Android Games APPS
Android Systems
Android Tablets APPS and Beyond
Smartphone Apps
Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools
Tablet PC
Car Sharing Car Leasing
Tabler Pc
Fly Fishing
Toyota Cars
Vacation Rentals
Stock market
NYSE
SSE Stock
Freight & Shipping News
Gluten
Lactose
Gout
My Coupon Life
Campgrounds Check
Outdoor
Kitchen Design and Redoo
Bath Remodeling
Palm Springs
Las Vegas Vacation Tipps
Lake Powell Boating
Homes for lease
Electric and green Car Blog
Pearls and diamonds
Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App
Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
|
Miscellaneous / Verschiedenes » alt.fan.james-bond » Craig Naysayers Have No Say in the Matter
| Craig Naysayers Have No Say in the Matter [message #240801] |
Mi, 22 März 2006 05:24 |
|
From
http://www.ananova.com/entertainment/story/sm_1771372.html?m enu=entertainment.film
Craig to return as Bond
Daniel Craig has reportedly agreed to star in another James Bond film.
Craig is currently shooting his first film as Bond reports IMDb.com.
Producer Barbara Broccoli is so certain the film will be a hit she has
already started working on the sequel.
She said: "We are already working on the sequel. We're in the early
stages of that. It will be an original story but will continue part of
what the story is in Casino Royale."
Craig has come under intense scrutiny since he was announced as Pierce
Brosnan's successor last year, with die hard fans setting up a website
encouraging cinema-goers to boycott his debut as Bond.
--- This possibly hints of the first real sequel in the series wherein
the second film might actually be a direct follow-up to the first, and
one that just might go beyond its PTS. And of course, Barb doesn't
want to take this Craig backlash lying down, so to speak, so of course
she's doing the only thing she can to discredit the whole brouhaha by
announcing that they're already at work on the sequel. Talk about
taking out all the fun out of life. But anyway, it looks like there
could be a Bond out in 2-007 after all.
|
|
|
| Re: Craig Naysayers Have No Say in the Matter [message #242501 ] |
Mi, 22 März 2006 06:57 |
|
Not like it'll get all the Craig bashers to SHUT THE HELL UP, because their
opinion doesn't matter, but it's a start..
"WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
news:1143001456.383292.272710 [at] j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> From
> http://www.ananova.com/entertainment/story/sm_1771372.html?m enu=entertainment.film
>
> Craig to return as Bond
>
> Daniel Craig has reportedly agreed to star in another James Bond film.
>
> Craig is currently shooting his first film as Bond reports IMDb.com.
>
> Producer Barbara Broccoli is so certain the film will be a hit she has
> already started working on the sequel.
>
> She said: "We are already working on the sequel. We're in the early
> stages of that. It will be an original story but will continue part of
> what the story is in Casino Royale."
>
> Craig has come under intense scrutiny since he was announced as Pierce
> Brosnan's successor last year, with die hard fans setting up a website
> encouraging cinema-goers to boycott his debut as Bond.
>
> --- This possibly hints of the first real sequel in the series wherein
> the second film might actually be a direct follow-up to the first, and
> one that just might go beyond its PTS. And of course, Barb doesn't
> want to take this Craig backlash lying down, so to speak, so of course
> she's doing the only thing she can to discredit the whole brouhaha by
> announcing that they're already at work on the sequel. Talk about
> taking out all the fun out of life. But anyway, it looks like there
> could be a Bond out in 2-007 after all.
>
|
|
|
| Re: Craig Naysayers Have No Say in the Matter [message #242524 ] |
Mi, 22 März 2006 16:09 |
|
"WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
news:1143001456.383292.272710 [at] j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> From
> http://www.ananova.com/entertainment/story/sm_1771372.html?m enu=entertainment.film
> --- This possibly hints of the first real sequel in the series wherein
> the second film might actually be a direct follow-up to the first, and
> one that just might go beyond its PTS. And of course, Barb doesn't
> want to take this Craig backlash lying down, so to speak, so of course
> she's doing the only thing she can to discredit the whole brouhaha by
> announcing that they're already at work on the sequel. Talk about
> taking out all the fun out of life. But anyway, it looks like there
> could be a Bond out in 2-007 after all.
That spin doesn't take away from the fact that EON is doing an excellent job
in managing the publicity and rumours in a positive manner.
I can't wait for "Casino Royale."
PS - Was that "lying down, so to speak" another sexual innuendo regarding B.
Broccoli? That's so...curious.
Tom Zielinski
"...Bond's eyes narrowed. He knew, at some point, he would have to slay this
particular dragon. He settled back in his chair, removing a Morlands' three
ring special from the gunmetal cigarette case. As he waited for the
delicious Balkan/Turkish blend to take effect on his lungs, he reflected
that you give a fuckin' aspirin a headache, pal..."
|
|
|
| Re: Craig Naysayers Have No Say in the Matter [message #242565 ] |
Do, 23 März 2006 00:23 |
|
Tom Zielinski wrote:
> "WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
> news:1143001456.383292.272710 [at] j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > From
> > http://www.ananova.com/entertainment/story/sm_1771372.html?m enu=entertainment.film
>
> > --- This possibly hints of the first real sequel in the series wherein
> > the second film might actually be a direct follow-up to the first, and
> > one that just might go beyond its PTS. And of course, Barb doesn't
> > want to take this Craig backlash lying down, so to speak, so of course
> > she's doing the only thing she can to discredit the whole brouhaha by
> > announcing that they're already at work on the sequel. Talk about
> > taking out all the fun out of life. But anyway, it looks like there
> > could be a Bond out in 2-007 after all.
>
> That spin doesn't take away from the fact that EON is doing an excellent job
> in managing the publicity and rumours in a positive manner.
--- No doubt, Barb is counter-strategizing in classic Karl Rove
fashion: ignore the voices of reason and just plow ahead like there's
no tomorrow.
> I can't wait for "Casino Royale."
--- I wish I could see what it is that you're getting out of this in a
way that I used to look forward to the next Connery Bond. Sorry, but
there's just no match here for me when it comes to that same kind of
anticipation. In other words, the EON hype is still not convincing me,
so the proof will still be in the pudding.
> PS - Was that "lying down, so to speak" another sexual innuendo regarding B.
> Broccoli? That's so...curious.
--- Depends what frame of mind you were in when you read it. Guess we
know, huh?
>
>
> Tom Zielinski
> "...Bond's eyes narrowed. He knew, at some point, he would have to slay this
> particular dragon. He settled back in his chair, removing a Morlands' three
> ring special from the gunmetal cigarette case. As he waited for the
> delicious Balkan/Turkish blend to take effect on his lungs, he reflected
> that you give a fuckin' aspirin a headache, pal..."
|
|
|
| Re: Craig Naysayers Have No Say in the Matter [message #242570 ] |
Do, 23 März 2006 01:31 |
|
"WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
news:1143069833.515667.21440 [at] t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Tom Zielinski wrote:
>> "WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
>> news:1143001456.383292.272710 [at] j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> > From
>> > http://www.ananova.com/entertainment/story/sm_1771372.html?m enu=entertainment.film
>>
>> > --- This possibly hints of the first real sequel in the series wherein
>> > the second film might actually be a direct follow-up to the first, and
>> > one that just might go beyond its PTS. And of course, Barb doesn't
>> > want to take this Craig backlash lying down, so to speak, so of course
>> > she's doing the only thing she can to discredit the whole brouhaha by
>> > announcing that they're already at work on the sequel. Talk about
>> > taking out all the fun out of life. But anyway, it looks like there
>> > could be a Bond out in 2-007 after all.
>>
>> That spin doesn't take away from the fact that EON is doing an excellent
>> job
>> in managing the publicity and rumours in a positive manner.
>
> --- No doubt, Barb is counter-strategizing in classic Karl Rove
> fashion: ignore the voices of reason and just plow ahead like there's
> no tomorrow.
LOL! Voices of reason? That's REALLY good!
>> I can't wait for "Casino Royale."
>
> --- I wish I could see what it is that you're getting out of this in a
> way that I used to look forward to the next Connery Bond. Sorry, but
> there's just no match here for me when it comes to that same kind of
> anticipation. In other words, the EON hype is still not convincing me,
> so the proof will still be in the pudding.
The "I can't wait for "Casino Royale" comment is in response to all that I
have heard about the film to date - not based on this single article.
>> PS - Was that "lying down, so to speak" another sexual innuendo regarding
>> B.
>> Broccoli? That's so...curious.
>
> --- Depends what frame of mind you were in when you read it. Guess we
> know, huh?
Oh, definitely the reader blends his perspective with the message. But it
also certainly depends upon what frame of mind you were in when you wrote
it.
Anyway, I can't wait for Casino Royale.
Tom Zielinski
"...Bond's eyes narrowed. He knew, at some point, he would have to slay this
particular dragon. He settled back in his chair, removing a Morlands' three
ring special from the gunmetal cigarette case. As he waited for the
delicious Balkan/Turkish blend to take effect on his lungs, he reflected
that you give a fuckin' aspirin a headache, pal..."
|
|
|
| Re: Craig Naysayers Have No Say in the Matter [message #242577 ] |
Do, 23 März 2006 02:10 |
|
Tom Zielinski wrote:
> "WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
> news:1143069833.515667.21440 [at] t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Tom Zielinski wrote:
> >> "WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
> >> news:1143001456.383292.272710 [at] j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> >> > From
> >> > http://www.ananova.com/entertainment/story/sm_1771372.html?m enu=entertainment.film
> >>
> >> > --- This possibly hints of the first real sequel in the series wherein
> >> > the second film might actually be a direct follow-up to the first, and
> >> > one that just might go beyond its PTS. And of course, Barb doesn't
> >> > want to take this Craig backlash lying down, so to speak, so of course
> >> > she's doing the only thing she can to discredit the whole brouhaha by
> >> > announcing that they're already at work on the sequel. Talk about
> >> > taking out all the fun out of life. But anyway, it looks like there
> >> > could be a Bond out in 2-007 after all.
> >>
> >> That spin doesn't take away from the fact that EON is doing an excellent
> >> job
> >> in managing the publicity and rumours in a positive manner.
> >
> > --- No doubt, Barb is counter-strategizing in classic Karl Rove
> > fashion: ignore the voices of reason and just plow ahead like there's
> > no tomorrow.
>
> LOL! Voices of reason? That's REALLY good!
>
--- Yeah, I know. I thought of it all by myself.
> >> I can't wait for "Casino Royale."
> >
> > --- I wish I could see what it is that you're getting out of this in a
> > way that I used to look forward to the next Connery Bond. Sorry, but
> > there's just no match here for me when it comes to that same kind of
> > anticipation. In other words, the EON hype is still not convincing me,
> > so the proof will still be in the pudding.
>
> The "I can't wait for "Casino Royale" comment is in response to all that I
> have heard about the film to date - not based on this single article.
--- Obviously. But the sum total of what I've read and seen still
doesn't add up to CR being something I really want to see. It'll be
something I know I will see, hopefully setting my skepticism aside [I
already think I'm going to have great difficulty with all the jerkycam
stuff the movie will be using], but it's not hitting me as something
I'm craving or even just merely looking forward to seeing because I
still don't like any of the ingredients they've come up with for it.
On other hand, if it's all mixed in balanced doses and stewed well
enough, it might actually be a half-decent Bond. But nothing I've read
or seen has really whetted my appetite for it.
> >> PS - Was that "lying down, so to speak" another sexual innuendo regarding
> >> B.
> >> Broccoli? That's so...curious.
> >
> > --- Depends what frame of mind you were in when you read it. Guess we
> > know, huh?
>
> Oh, definitely the reader blends his perspective with the message. But it
> also certainly depends upon what frame of mind you were in when you wrote
> it.
--- Cleverly witty?
> Anyway, I can't wait for Casino Royale.
--- Personally, I can't wait for the great lay I'm expecting this
weekend. I think I'll get more out of that one, and sooner too.
>
>
>
> Tom Zielinski
> "...Bond's eyes narrowed. He knew, at some point, he would have to slay this
> particular dragon. He settled back in his chair, removing a Morlands' three
> ring special from the gunmetal cigarette case. As he waited for the
> delicious Balkan/Turkish blend to take effect on his lungs, he reflected
> that you give a fuckin' aspirin a headache, pal..."
|
|
|
| Re: Craig Naysayers Have No Say in the Matter [message #242580 ] |
Do, 23 März 2006 02:26 |
|
"WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
news:1143076250.263442.155540 [at] z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> Anyway, I can't wait for Casino Royale.
>
> --- Personally, I can't wait for the great lay I'm expecting this
> weekend. I think I'll get more out of that one, and sooner too.
Well, best of luck. Pity you have to wait the weekend though.
I can't wait for Casino Royale.
Tom Zielinski
"...Bond's eyes narrowed. He knew, at some point, he would have to slay this
particular dragon. He settled back in his chair, removing a Morlands' three
ring special from the gunmetal cigarette case. As he waited for the
delicious Balkan/Turkish blend to take effect on his lungs, he reflected
that you give a fuckin' aspirin a headache, pal..."
|
|
|
| Re: Craig Naysayers Have No Say in the Matter [message #242592 ] |
Do, 23 März 2006 03:39 |
|
WQ wrote:
>
> --- No doubt, Barb is counter-strategizing in classic Karl Rove
> fashion: ignore the voices of reason and just plow ahead like there's
> no tomorrow.
>
Coming from mr. "Genital Perspective." Great...
>
> --- I wish I could see what it is that you're getting out of this in a
> way that I used to look forward to the next Connery Bond. Sorry, but
> there's just no match here for me when it comes to that same kind of
> anticipation. In other words, the EON hype is still not convincing me,
> so the proof will still be in the pudding.
>
That's the same for EVERYBODY. Unlike you, he just hopes the next film
is GOOD.
>
> --- Depends what frame of mind you were in when you read it. Guess we
> know, huh?
>
And you've got an empty frame.
|
|
|
| Re: Craig Naysayers Have No Say in the Matter [message #242619 ] |
Do, 23 März 2006 13:40 |
|
"Tom Zielinski" <rtomz [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Bt-dnY2O8tnPZLzZ4p2dnA [at] comcast.com...
>
> "WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
> news:1143076250.263442.155540 [at] z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>>> Anyway, I can't wait for Casino Royale.
>>
>> --- Personally, I can't wait for the great lay I'm expecting this
>> weekend. I think I'll get more out of that one, and sooner too.
>
>
> Well, best of luck. Pity you have to wait the weekend though.
I'm sure he and Sc*jo will share a great weekend together....
> I can't wait for Casino Royale.
Me neither!
|
|
|
| Re: Craig Naysayers Have No Say in the Matter [message #242653 ] |
Do, 23 März 2006 20:29 |
|
Kent wrote:
> "Tom Zielinski" <rtomz [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:Bt-dnY2O8tnPZLzZ4p2dnA [at] comcast.com...
> >
> > "WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
> > news:1143076250.263442.155540 [at] z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >
> >
> >>> Anyway, I can't wait for Casino Royale.
> >>
> >> --- Personally, I can't wait for the great lay I'm expecting this
> >> weekend. I think I'll get more out of that one, and sooner too.
> >
> >
> > Well, best of luck. Pity you have to wait the weekend though.
>
> I'm sure he and Sc*jo will share a great weekend together....
>
> > I can't wait for Casino Royale.
>
> Me neither!
--- Yeah, and I can see you and Tom snuggling up real cozy together in
the back seat of some theater on opening day all pumped up to get your
Craig jollies.
|
|
|
| Re: Craig Naysayers Have No Say in the Matter [message #242697 ] |
Fr, 24 März 2006 15:36 |
|
"WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
news:1143142187.841345.281660 [at] t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>
> Kent wrote:
>> "Tom Zielinski" <rtomz [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
>> news:Bt-dnY2O8tnPZLzZ4p2dnA [at] comcast.com...
>> >
>> > "WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
>> > news:1143076250.263442.155540 [at] z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>> >
>> >
>> >>> Anyway, I can't wait for Casino Royale.
>> >>
>> >> --- Personally, I can't wait for the great lay I'm expecting this
>> >> weekend. I think I'll get more out of that one, and sooner too.
>> >
>> >
>> > Well, best of luck. Pity you have to wait the weekend though.
>>
>> I'm sure he and Sc*jo will share a great weekend together....
>>
>> > I can't wait for Casino Royale.
>>
>> Me neither!
>
> --- Yeah, and I can see you and Tom snuggling up real cozy together in
> the back seat of some theater on opening day all pumped up to get your
> Craig jollies.
Ya know...it wasn't me that implied anything about your sexual preference.
Why am I not surprised that you have so little class.
You're boring. A one-note whine. And I'm tired of you.
<Plonk>
|
|
|
| Re: Craig Naysayers Have No Say in the Matter [message #242714 ] |
Fr, 24 März 2006 19:21 |
|
Tom Zielinski wrote:
> "WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
> news:1143142187.841345.281660 [at] t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> >
> > Kent wrote:
> >> "Tom Zielinski" <rtomz [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
> >> news:Bt-dnY2O8tnPZLzZ4p2dnA [at] comcast.com...
> >> >
> >> > "WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:1143076250.263442.155540 [at] z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >>> Anyway, I can't wait for Casino Royale.
> >> >>
> >> >> --- Personally, I can't wait for the great lay I'm expecting this
> >> >> weekend. I think I'll get more out of that one, and sooner too.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Well, best of luck. Pity you have to wait the weekend though.
> >>
> >> I'm sure he and Sc*jo will share a great weekend together....
> >>
> >> > I can't wait for Casino Royale.
> >>
> >> Me neither!
> >
> > --- Yeah, and I can see you and Tom snuggling up real cozy together in
> > the back seat of some theater on opening day all pumped up to get your
> > Craig jollies.
>
>
> Ya know...it wasn't me that implied anything about your sexual preference.
>
> Why am I not surprised that you have so little class.
>
> You're boring. A one-note whine. And I'm tired of you.
>
> <Plonk>
--- Sorry I've been plonked. But if you're going to plonk me, you
might as well plonk Kent too. I didn't ask for his comment either.
|
|
|
| Re: Craig Naysayers Have No Say in the Matter [message #242798 ] |
So, 26 März 2006 01:53 |
|
It took you long enough Tom. I KF'd him long ago and only know about his
writing when someone replies to him and quotes him.
Draugnar
"Tom Zielinski" <rtomz [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
news:Z9ednf0ENqBsnrnZnZ2dnUVZ_sydnZ2d [at] comcast.com...
>
> "WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
> news:1143142187.841345.281660 [at] t31g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> Kent wrote:
>>> "Tom Zielinski" <rtomz [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
>>> news:Bt-dnY2O8tnPZLzZ4p2dnA [at] comcast.com...
>>> >
>>> > "WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
>>> > news:1143076250.263442.155540 [at] z34g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >>> Anyway, I can't wait for Casino Royale.
>>> >>
>>> >> --- Personally, I can't wait for the great lay I'm expecting this
>>> >> weekend. I think I'll get more out of that one, and sooner too.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Well, best of luck. Pity you have to wait the weekend though.
>>>
>>> I'm sure he and Sc*jo will share a great weekend together....
>>>
>>> > I can't wait for Casino Royale.
>>>
>>> Me neither!
>>
>> --- Yeah, and I can see you and Tom snuggling up real cozy together in
>> the back seat of some theater on opening day all pumped up to get your
>> Craig jollies.
>
>
> Ya know...it wasn't me that implied anything about your sexual preference.
>
> Why am I not surprised that you have so little class.
>
> You're boring. A one-note whine. And I'm tired of you.
>
>
> <Plonk>
>
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Fr Mai 25 21:05:53 CEST 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,05389 Sekunden |
