| Meet the new James Bond, Craig Becker [message #240704] |
Di, 21 März 2006 00:15 |
|
http://img457.imageshack.us/img457/579/craigbecker17ug.jpg
And that, folks, is an exact match. I didn't change the shape of their
features - they lines up 100 percent. Promise. That is Daniel Craig and
Boris Becker - their features line up perfectly. Quite something!
MMS
|
|
|
| Re: Meet the new James Bond, Craig Becker [message #240731 ] |
Di, 21 März 2006 03:40 |
|
<<Lurker delurking>>
In the heat of the night, "Moo Moo Sandwich" <booby [at] myself.com> wrote:
>http://img457.imageshack.us/img457/579/craigbecker17ug.jpg
>And that, folks, is an exact match. I didn't change the shape of their
>features - they lines up 100 percent. Promise. That is Daniel Craig and
>Boris Becker - their features line up perfectly. Quite something!
Sir, despite my better judgment, I must give in to the inclination to ask
you this: Who, exactly, are you talking to when you post tihs stuff?
I mean, you have a right to post and all, and I wouldn't try to censor
anyone, but I just don't get you. You always say things like "folks" and
"you" in your notes, as if you think you're actually engaged in a dialogue
with other people. But one thing is painfully clear, almost embarrassingly
so to an outsider such as myself, and that is this: No one is paying any
attention to you.
Nearly all of your notes go unanswered, and the few responses you do get
are just requests for you to go away. Trolling is one thing, and if that's
all you're doing, then so be it. But you spend so much time here posting
pictures and articles, and acting comradely to a newsgroup that has long
written you off as worthless -- indeed, that doesn't even know what you've
posted. As someone who has been watching this little charade for quite
some time now, I have to tell you...it really makes you look desperate for
friendship.
Tell me: Are you so lonely and without companionship in the real world that
you would continue to seek acceptance from a group of people online who
have made it clear they want nothing to do with you? Who have killfiled you
en masse, and who completely ignore everything you post?
Are you so desperate an individual that you would continue to post in the
manner you do, acting as though someone is reading and enjoying your posts
and bothering to click on any of the links you are providing? As though
you are part of this community?
Sure, now and then, someone new to the board takes a bite, but that's it.
Do you truly have nothing better to do with your life than to waste it in
this manner? If so, then I truly pity you, because that is so sad.
|
|
|
| Re: Meet the new James Bond, Craig Becker [message #240743 ] |
Di, 21 März 2006 11:59 |
|
Hey, I don't care much if you don't like me or ignore me. This is a
forum about James Bond so I post 'stuff' about it. Whether people reply
to my posts isn't that important. But seeing as you *did* reply, Tom,
kind of destroys your point! Heh.
MMS
|
|
|
| To Mr. Delancy [message #240748 ] |
Di, 21 März 2006 13:39 |
|
"Tom Delancy" <Tom_D_PhD [at] delancyandsons.com> wrote in message
news:a2pu12tscg8tcqig7g8k34thd4t4jdts4l [at] 4ax.com...
> <<Lurker delurking>>
> Sir, despite my better judgment, I must give in to the inclination to ask
> you this: Who, exactly, are you talking to when you post tihs stuff?
<Snip>
Excellent post sir! Thank you sincerely. I'd hope he'd get the message but
am not optimistic.
How about lurking less and posting more? I'm certain your perspectives on
Bond would be a good read.
Sincerely,
Tom Zielinski
|
|
|
| Re: To Mr. Delancy [message #240758 ] |
Di, 21 März 2006 17:14 |
|
I second TZ's support of your posting. Your well written message said more
in a few paragraphs that most of my own long-winded ramblings. Please, post
more. I, too, am interested in your views.
Draugnar
"Tom Zielinski" <rtomz [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
news:gZudnafzx95uboLZRVn-uQ [at] comcast.com...
>
> "Tom Delancy" <Tom_D_PhD [at] delancyandsons.com> wrote in message
> news:a2pu12tscg8tcqig7g8k34thd4t4jdts4l [at] 4ax.com...
>> <<Lurker delurking>>
>
>
>> Sir, despite my better judgment, I must give in to the inclination to ask
>> you this: Who, exactly, are you talking to when you post tihs stuff?
>
>
> <Snip>
>
> Excellent post sir! Thank you sincerely. I'd hope he'd get the message
> but
> am not optimistic.
>
> How about lurking less and posting more? I'm certain your perspectives on
> Bond would be a good read.
>
>
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Tom Zielinski
>
>
|
|
|
