Sprinkler Systems Uhaul move Lawn care Roses and trees Ford Parts Chrysler Parts Lake Powell New IPod Touch Apps New IPhone Apps IPhone Apps IPad Information IPad Apps Android APPS Android Games APPS Android Systems Android Tablets APPS and Beyond Smartphone Apps Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools Tablet PC Car Sharing Car Leasing Tabler Pc Fly Fishing Toyota Cars Vacation Rentals Stock market NYSE SSE Stock Freight & Shipping News Gluten Lactose Gout My Coupon Life Campgrounds Check Outdoor Kitchen Design and Redoo Bath Remodeling Palm Springs Las Vegas Vacation Tipps Lake Powell Boating Homes for lease Electric and green Car Blog Pearls and diamonds Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
Reader


[Suche]  [Administrator]  [Hinweise zum Reader]  [Startseite]
Fantasy » alt.fan.harry-potter » OOTP article
OOTP article [message #238189] Di, 14 März 2006 17:55
wadkin2000  
At www.empireonline.com/news/story, there's an article with the trio
and David Heyman about the filming of OOTP. They've already filmed
scenes with Grawp (on blue screen). Dan is filming his "kiss" with Cho
today and says it will be strange since one of his parents will be on
the set. Rupert said David Yates is really cool, very laid back.
They'll be filming until May when they take a two-month break for Dan
and Emma to study and take their exams and then continue filming.
Unfortunately, already David Heyman is making noises about how the book
had to be cut, but as usual, is pleased with the script. He said Jo
was shown the script a few months ago and was happy about it. Daniel
says that Harry won't be coming across on the screen as manic and
argumentative as he was in the book (paraphrasing).
Re: OOTP article (Link Correction) [message #238197 ] Di, 14 März 2006 20:09
DM  
wadkin2000 [at] yahoo.com wrote:
> At www.empireonline.com/news/story, there's an article with the trio
> and David Heyman about the filming of OOTP. They've already filmed
> scenes with Grawp (on blue screen). Dan is filming his "kiss" with Cho
> today and says it will be strange since one of his parents will be on
> the set. Rupert said David Yates is really cool, very laid back.
> They'll be filming until May when they take a two-month break for Dan
> and Emma to study and take their exams and then continue filming.
> Unfortunately, already David Heyman is making noises about how the book
> had to be cut, but as usual, is pleased with the script. He said Jo
> was shown the script a few months ago and was happy about it. Daniel
> says that Harry won't be coming across on the screen as manic and
> argumentative as he was in the book (paraphrasing).
>

http://www.empireonline.com/news/story.asp?NID=18268

I like Jason Isaacs' comments when asked if he was returning for his
role as Lucius Malfoy: "I hope so - you'll have to ask David. I can't
bear the idea that somebody else would get to wear my Paris Hilton wig,
but you never know."

Ha!

--
DM
---

,_,
(O,O)
( )
-"-"-

dm1498 (at) gmail.com
---
"RUN, SCABBERS, RUN!" - Jenny Lestrange
"I would've gotten away with it if it weren't for those meddling kids!"
- Lord Voldemort

HPCode(v1.1) S PS++COS++POA+++*GOF+++OOTP+HBP+++FF= QA
CH+++DD+++HB-HM+*PO+++TR+AR++CM++
HP/Gi-RW/Ch-CC/Mn-FW/GW/Ol-NL/Fl-SS/Um-VK/Ka
Re: OOTP article [message #238200 ] Di, 14 März 2006 21:30
mag3  
On 14 Mar 2006 08:55:06 -0800, wadkin2000 [at] yahoo.com wrote:

>Daniel
>says that Harry won't be coming across on the screen as manic and
>argumentative as he was in the book (paraphrasing).

But the paraphrasing's the thing though. What they said was that Harry
"will not be just a petulant teen in the film version" - "petulant" being the
operative word.

IMHO, Harry's behavior is not out of petulance but of angst. He's really scared. I never
read "petulance" into Harry's behavior at all when reading OOTP but I understand
why others do. To me, it's always been an angst issue.

I'll be looking forward to seeing him bring that out.


____________________________________________
Regards,

Arnold
Re: OOTP article [message #238216 ] Di, 14 März 2006 22:53
drusilla  
mag3 escribió:
> On 14 Mar 2006 08:55:06 -0800, wadkin2000 [at] yahoo.com wrote:
>
>> Daniel
>> says that Harry won't be coming across on the screen as manic and
>> argumentative as he was in the book (paraphrasing).
>
> But the paraphrasing's the thing though. What they said was that Harry
> "will not be just a petulant teen in the film version" - "petulant" being the
> operative word.
>
> IMHO, Harry's behavior is not out of petulance but of angst. He's really scared. I never
> read "petulance" into Harry's behavior at all when reading OOTP but I understand
> why others do. To me, it's always been an angst issue.
>
> I'll be looking forward to seeing him bring that out.

When the book starts, it might be confused with petulance, 'I, the one
who fought Voldemort; I, the one who saved the Stone' (I am talking
specifically about Chapter 4'. When he was locked at Privet Drive, he
was mad because no one gave him an explanation nor simple news because
he, over the rest, had more rights than other to know about rather than
because he was curious, IMO.

Harry was in this book reckless than ever, there is an abysmal
difference between the Harry from other books and the OotP Harry. I
really hope Daniel doesn't disappoint us :)
Re: OOTP article [message #238217 ] Mi, 15 März 2006 00:37
wadkin2000  
mag3 wrote:
> On 14 Mar 2006 08:55:06 -0800, wadkin2000 [at] yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >Daniel
> >says that Harry won't be coming across on the screen as manic and
> >argumentative as he was in the book (paraphrasing).
>
> But the paraphrasing's the thing though. What they said was that Harry
> "will not be just a petulant teen in the film version" - "petulant" being the
> operative word.
>
> IMHO, Harry's behavior is not out of petulance but of angst. He's really scared. I never
> read "petulance" into Harry's behavior at all when reading OOTP but I understand
> why others do. To me, it's always been an angst issue.
>
> I'll be looking forward to seeing him bring that out.
>
>
> ____________________________________________
> Regards,
>
> Arnold


I agree with you. If I had a word to describe him OOTP, "petulant"
would not be it.
Re: OOTP article [message #238264 ] Mi, 15 März 2006 09:44
Toon  
On 14 Mar 2006 08:55:06 -0800, wadkin2000 [at] yahoo.com wrote:


>was shown the script a few months ago and was happy about it. Daniel
>says that Harry won't be coming across on the screen as manic and
>argumentative as he was in the book (paraphrasing).

Yeah, since when do guys get year round PMS?
Re: OOTP article [message #238265 ] Mi, 15 März 2006 09:46
Toon  
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:53:40 -0500, drusilla <me [at] me.net> wrote:

>mag3 escribió:
>> On 14 Mar 2006 08:55:06 -0800, wadkin2000 [at] yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel
>>> says that Harry won't be coming across on the screen as manic and
>>> argumentative as he was in the book (paraphrasing).
>>
>> But the paraphrasing's the thing though. What they said was that Harry
>> "will not be just a petulant teen in the film version" - "petulant" being the
>> operative word.
>>
>> IMHO, Harry's behavior is not out of petulance but of angst. He's really scared. I never
>> read "petulance" into Harry's behavior at all when reading OOTP but I understand
>> why others do. To me, it's always been an angst issue.
>>
>> I'll be looking forward to seeing him bring that out.
>
>When the book starts, it might be confused with petulance, 'I, the one
>who fought Voldemort; I, the one who saved the Stone' (I am talking
>specifically about Chapter 4'. When he was locked at Privet Drive, he
>was mad because no one gave him an explanation nor simple news because
>he, over the rest, had more rights than other to know about rather than
>because he was curious, IMO.
>
>Harry was in this book reckless than ever, there is an abysmal
>difference between the Harry from other books and the OotP Harry. I
>really hope Daniel doesn't disappoint us :)

Well, he's 15, and a boy. Naturally he's an idiot. See Snape's Worst
memory for more on that.
Re: OOTP article [message #238275 ] Mi, 15 März 2006 11:34
Deevo  
<wadkin2000 [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1142373083.031849.235300 [at] j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> mag3 wrote:
<snip>
>> IMHO, Harry's behavior is not out of petulance but of angst. He's really
>> scared. I never
>> read "petulance" into Harry's behavior at all when reading OOTP but I
>> understand
>> why others do. To me, it's always been an angst issue.
>>
>> I'll be looking forward to seeing him bring that out.
>
> I agree with you. If I had a word to describe him OOTP, "petulant"
> would not be it.

To be brutally honest I think normal is the best way to describe Harry in
OOTP, after all of the shit that Jo has put his character through there is
no way he couldn't have been angry as hell by that stage, anything else and
he would have had to have been a saint.
--
Deevo
Geraldton Western Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/mckenzie/index.htm
Re: OOTP article [message #238318 ] Do, 16 März 2006 00:43
Bernie Dwyer  
Toon wrote:
>
> On 14 Mar 2006 08:55:06 -0800, wadkin2000 [at] yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >was shown the script a few months ago and was happy about it. Daniel
> >says that Harry won't be coming across on the screen as manic and
> >argumentative as he was in the book (paraphrasing).
>
> Yeah, since when do guys get year round PMS?

IIRC, it was between the ages of 12 and 17.
--

Bernie Dwyer
There are no 'z' in my email address
Re: OOTP article [message #238342 ] Do, 16 März 2006 07:00
Toon  
On Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:34:41 +0800, "Deevo"
<mckenzie [at] NOSPAMmidwest.com.au> wrote:

><wadkin2000 [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
>news:1142373083.031849.235300 [at] j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>
>> mag3 wrote:
><snip>
>>> IMHO, Harry's behavior is not out of petulance but of angst. He's really
>>> scared. I never
>>> read "petulance" into Harry's behavior at all when reading OOTP but I
>>> understand
>>> why others do. To me, it's always been an angst issue.
>>>
>>> I'll be looking forward to seeing him bring that out.
>>
>> I agree with you. If I had a word to describe him OOTP, "petulant"
>> would not be it.
>
>To be brutally honest I think normal is the best way to describe Harry in
>OOTP, after all of the shit that Jo has put his character through there is
>no way he couldn't have been angry as hell by that stage, anything else and
>he would have had to have been a saint.

Consideirng he has a madman who's constantly trying to kill him, I'd
say he was rather chipper. :P
Re: OOTP article [message #238443 ] Fr, 17 März 2006 07:28
marli_0000  
In Harry's case, it wasn't PMS. It was PTSD. What surprises me is
that he gets over it by Book 6.

Marli.
Re: OOTP article [message #238515 ] Fr, 17 März 2006 22:12
Lady Grey  
mag3 wrote:
> On 14 Mar 2006 08:55:06 -0800, wadkin2000 [at] yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >Daniel
> >says that Harry won't be coming across on the screen as manic and
> >argumentative as he was in the book (paraphrasing).
>
> But the paraphrasing's the thing though. What they said was that Harry
> "will not be just a petulant teen in the film version" - "petulant" being the
> operative word.

and not paying due attention to the word 'just' is another thing
though. "Both he and Heyman assure us that Harry will not be /just/ a
petulant teen in the film version."

so harry is going to be 'petulant' in the film but that's not all he's
going to be.

> IMHO, Harry's behavior is not out of petulance but of angst. He's really scared. I never
> read "petulance" into Harry's behavior at all when reading OOTP but I understand
> why others do. To me, it's always been an angst issue.

yeah definately agree!

> I'll be looking forward to seeing him bring that out.

I doubt Dan's going to manage that. Dan's sucks as an actor, haven't
you noticed?

--
Jane Grey
Re: OOTP article [message #238516 ] Fr, 17 März 2006 22:30
drusilla  
Jane Grey escribió:
> mag3 wrote:
>> On 14 Mar 2006 08:55:06 -0800, wadkin2000 [at] yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>> Daniel
>>> says that Harry won't be coming across on the screen as manic and
>>> argumentative as he was in the book (paraphrasing).
>> But the paraphrasing's the thing though. What they said was that Harry
>> "will not be just a petulant teen in the film version" - "petulant" being the
>> operative word.
>
> and not paying due attention to the word 'just' is another thing
> though. "Both he and Heyman assure us that Harry will not be /just/ a
> petulant teen in the film version."
>
> so harry is going to be 'petulant' in the film but that's not all he's
> going to be.
>

because it would be silly to assume Harry was only petulant... he was
lots of other things in OotP... immature, neurotic, paranoid,
rebellious, a brat... not just a petulant...
Vorheriges Thema:Troels: Check this out: Re: Attention George Kerby, Mr. Un-Science (OT)
Nächstes Thema:What is the significance of...
Gehe zu:
  


aktuelle Zeit: Fr Mai 25 20:17:24 CEST 2012

Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,04115 Sekunden
.:: Startseite - Hinweise - Impressum ::.

Powered