Sprinkler Systems Uhaul move Lawn care Roses and trees Ford Parts Chrysler Parts Lake Powell New IPod Touch Apps New IPhone Apps IPhone Apps IPad Information IPad Apps Android APPS Android Games APPS Android Systems Android Tablets APPS and Beyond Smartphone Apps Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools Tablet PC Car Sharing Car Leasing Tabler Pc Fly Fishing Toyota Cars Vacation Rentals Stock market NYSE SSE Stock Freight & Shipping News Gluten Lactose Gout My Coupon Life Campgrounds Check Outdoor Kitchen Design and Redoo Bath Remodeling Palm Springs Las Vegas Vacation Tipps Lake Powell Boating Homes for lease Electric and green Car Blog Pearls and diamonds Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
Reader


[Suche]  [Administrator]  [Hinweise zum Reader]  [Startseite]
Miscellaneous / Verschiedenes » alt.fan.james-bond » Prickly Craig
Prickly Craig [message #227987] Mi, 01 März 2006 08:13
WQ  
From: http://www.entertainmentwise.com/news?id=14025

Daniel Craig must be wishing he had never taken on the James Bond role
as so far he has not exactly had a great time of it...

He has been berated by Bond fans, had teeth knocked out on set and now
is suffering from a bout of prickly heat!

According to The Sun, Craig is unable to take the heat of the Bahamas
where he is currently filming for 'Casino Royale'.

A source told the red top: "It's driving him mad. He constantly wants
to scratch. It's worst when he does a costume change. He's in agony.
He's been moaning to his assistants that he's got prickly heat. He's
extremely wary of being outside now but the nature of filming is such
that he is out in the heat all day."

What will go wrong for him next?


--- This is just the beginning, but I still stand by my prediction: CR
in February 2007.
Re: Prickly Craig [message #227989 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 08:17
WQ  
And I just have to add the embellished version from:

http://www.lse.co.uk/ShowbizNews.asp?Code=YW281432R&head line=daniel_craigs_prickly_problem


LIFE STYLE EXTRA (UK) - Daniel Craig has suffered another setback
filming the new James Bond movie - a nasty case of prickly heat.

The hapless star - who has been lambasted by 007 fans who claim he's
the wrong choice to play the suave spy - got sunburned topping up his
tan for 'Casino Royale'.

It comes just weeks after Craig lost two teeth shooting a fight scene
and confessed to film-makers he didn't know how to drive Bond's classic
Aston Martin DB5 car.

An on-set source told Britain's The Sun newspaper: "It's driving him
mad. He constantly wants to scratch. It's worst when he does a costume
change. He is in agony.

"Daniel has been moaning to his assistants that he's got prickly heat.
He is extremely wary of being outside now."

Meanwhile, Craig reportedly stunned the film's crew when he asked them
to supply him with an array of pampering products.

A set insider is quoted in Britain's Daily Star newspaper as saying:
"He wanted wet wipes, baby lotion and, strangely, two nail files - the
sort of item's Goldfinger's aide Pussy Galore might have wanted. No
one dared ask him why he needs such girlie items - but things could be
worse."
Re: Prickly Craig [message #227990 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 08:22
JHause  
I thought your prediction was shooting would be delayed while they
recast.

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz.....
Re: Prickly Craig [message #227993 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 11:41
phil.gerrard1  
WQ wrote:

> And I just have to add the embellished version from:
>
> http://www.lse.co.uk/ShowbizNews.asp?Code=YW281432R&head line=daniel_craigs_prickly_problem
>
>
> LIFE STYLE EXTRA (UK) - Daniel Craig has suffered another setback
> filming the new James Bond movie - a nasty case of prickly heat.
>
> The hapless star - who has been lambasted by 007 fans who claim he's
> the wrong choice to play the suave spy - got sunburned topping up his
> tan for 'Casino Royale'.
>
> It comes just weeks after Craig lost two teeth shooting a fight scene
> and confessed to film-makers he didn't know how to drive Bond's classic
> Aston Martin DB5 car.
>
> An on-set source told Britain's The Sun newspaper: "It's driving him
> mad. He constantly wants to scratch. It's worst when he does a costume
> change. He is in agony.
>
> "Daniel has been moaning to his assistants that he's got prickly heat.
> He is extremely wary of being outside now."
>
> Meanwhile, Craig reportedly stunned the film's crew when he asked them
> to supply him with an array of pampering products.
>
> A set insider is quoted in Britain's Daily Star newspaper as saying:
> "He wanted wet wipes, baby lotion and, strangely, two nail files - the
> sort of item's Goldfinger's aide Pussy Galore might have wanted. No
> one dared ask him why he needs such girlie items - but things could be
> worse."

'Embellished' is putting it mildly. The last two paragraphs are about
as idiotic as anything I've seen in a tabloid newspaper. The crew was
'stunned' when Craig asked somebody to pop to the chemist and buy a
couple of quid's worth of products which most people have in their
bathroom cabinets? Yeah, that's *real* Hollywood diva behaviour, isn't
it? I'm sure everybody was *shocked* by his *outrageous* demands.

And a minor case of sunburn is going to cause CR's release date to be
put back by a year? Get real.

This is just getting silly.

Best

Phil
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228001 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 14:36
WQ  
phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
> WQ wrote:
>
> > And I just have to add the embellished version from:
> >
> > http://www.lse.co.uk/ShowbizNews.asp?Code=YW281432R&head line=daniel_craigs_prickly_problem
> >
> >
> > LIFE STYLE EXTRA (UK) - Daniel Craig has suffered another setback
> > filming the new James Bond movie - a nasty case of prickly heat.
> >
> > The hapless star - who has been lambasted by 007 fans who claim he's
> > the wrong choice to play the suave spy - got sunburned topping up his
> > tan for 'Casino Royale'.
> >
> > It comes just weeks after Craig lost two teeth shooting a fight scene
> > and confessed to film-makers he didn't know how to drive Bond's classic
> > Aston Martin DB5 car.
> >
> > An on-set source told Britain's The Sun newspaper: "It's driving him
> > mad. He constantly wants to scratch. It's worst when he does a costume
> > change. He is in agony.
> >
> > "Daniel has been moaning to his assistants that he's got prickly heat.
> > He is extremely wary of being outside now."
> >
> > Meanwhile, Craig reportedly stunned the film's crew when he asked them
> > to supply him with an array of pampering products.
> >
> > A set insider is quoted in Britain's Daily Star newspaper as saying:
> > "He wanted wet wipes, baby lotion and, strangely, two nail files - the
> > sort of item's Goldfinger's aide Pussy Galore might have wanted. No
> > one dared ask him why he needs such girlie items - but things could be
> > worse."
>
> 'Embellished' is putting it mildly. The last two paragraphs are about
> as idiotic as anything I've seen in a tabloid newspaper. The crew was
> 'stunned' when Craig asked somebody to pop to the chemist and buy a
> couple of quid's worth of products which most people have in their
> bathroom cabinets? Yeah, that's *real* Hollywood diva behaviour, isn't
> it? I'm sure everybody was *shocked* by his *outrageous* demands.
>
> And a minor case of sunburn is going to cause CR's release date to be
> put back by a year? Get real.

--- Well, maybe hardly minor. Sure, it's not known to what extent his
prickly heat is other than it's driving him crazy, but it could
possibly be a percursor to developing an allergy to the sun itself.
There are people who are sun-allergic, I happen to know one. She was
fine with the sun till her early 30s and then one day, bam, just like
that, out of the blue! Skin rash like you wouldn't believe and it's
never been the same for her since. She literally has to stay out of
it.

>
> This is just getting silly.
>
> Best
>
> Phil
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228002 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 14:50
phil.gerrard1  
WQ wrote:

> --- Well, maybe hardly minor. Sure, it's not known to what extent his
> prickly heat is other than it's driving him crazy, but it could
> possibly be a percursor to developing an allergy to the sun itself.
> There are people who are sun-allergic, I happen to know one. She was
> fine with the sun till her early 30s and then one day, bam, just like
> that, out of the blue! Skin rash like you wouldn't believe and it's
> never been the same for her since. She literally has to stay out of
> it.

I'm sorry for your friend. However, I think it's more likely that
Craig simply didn't use enough Ambre Solaire, stayed in the sun too
long, and got burned as a result. That's slightly more common in my
experience ;-)

Best

Phil

(Reflecting that when you compare what's happened on CR to the
roll-call of deaths, near-deaths, hospitalisations, and serious
injuries which have occurred on other Bond films, Craig and company
have got off pretty lightly so far, and that requests for cheap
toiletries seem pretty trivial in comparison to requests for limitless
supplies of cigars or days off filming to play golf.)
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228003 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 15:37
phil.gerrard1  
Incidentally -

Wet-wipes: to help remove makeup

Baby lotion: to protect skin against irritation from makeup (doubly
important if you're sunburned)

Nail files: to help remove harder, spirit-gummed prosthetic items such
as fake scars which won't simply peel off

All standard kit for an actor who's going to be made up at any point
during a play or movie. Yep, I bet the crew were 'stunned' by
these requests.

Best

Phil
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228005 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 16:39
WQ  
phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
> Incidentally -
>
> Wet-wipes: to help remove makeup
>
> Baby lotion: to protect skin against irritation from makeup (doubly
> important if you're sunburned)
>
> Nail files: to help remove harder, spirit-gummed prosthetic items such
> as fake scars which won't simply peel off
>
> All standard kit for an actor who's going to be made up at any point
> during a play or movie. Yep, I bet the crew were 'stunned' by
> these requests.

--- Well, when you put it that way, I guess I'll never be able to read
another CR-related news report and take it seriously again.

>
> Best
>
> Phil
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228006 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 16:52
phil.gerrard1  
WQ wrote:

> --- Well, when you put it that way, I guess I'll never be able to read
> another CR-related news report and take it seriously again.

Biting sarcasm, right? See, I'm learning ;-)

In fact, I'm starting to find this tabloid stuff amusingly absurd
rather than annoying. What's going to be the next sign that CR is
'jinxed' and that Craig is a wuss? Craig spills his Evian? Craig gets
bitten by a crew-member's poodle? Craig feels a little ill after
eating an unripe banana?

Best

Phil
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228007 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 17:00
WQ  
phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
> WQ wrote:
>
> > --- Well, when you put it that way, I guess I'll never be able to read
> > another CR-related news report and take it seriously again.
>
> Biting sarcasm, right? See, I'm learning ;-)
>
> In fact, I'm starting to find this tabloid stuff amusingly absurd
> rather than annoying. What's going to be the next sign that CR is
> 'jinxed' and that Craig is a wuss? Craig spills his Evian? Craig gets
> bitten by a crew-member's poodle? Craig feels a little ill after
> eating an unripe banana?
>

--- Or maybe Craig doesn't show up for work?


> Best
>
> Phil
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228008 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 17:17
Paul Clarke  
phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:

> In fact, I'm starting to find this tabloid stuff amusingly absurd
> rather than annoying. What's going to be the next sign that CR is
> 'jinxed' and that Craig is a wuss? Craig spills his Evian? Craig gets
> bitten by a crew-member's poodle? Craig feels a little ill after
> eating an unripe banana?

If I had more time on my hands and no life, I would start up a satirical
website: brosnannotbond, with pics from his pre-Bond days, such as the
IRA hitman from "The Long Good Friday" who pretends to be gay to get his
mark and indulges in a little kiss with a man at a swimming pool change
room. Outrageous! A gay Bond! Then I'd dredge up candid pics of Brosnan
not at his best--you know, with goofy looks on his face or showing a
double chin or something, the pics that tabloids excel at
showcasing--and stick them on the site. Bring back Roger Moore!!!
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228009 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 18:09
JHause  
http://www.kinoweb.de/film2000/GreyOwl/pix/GreyOwl1_L.jpg
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228010 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 18:21
ahk  
phil.gerrard1 [at] ntlworld.com wrote:

>Incidentally -

>Wet-wipes: to help remove makeup

Is it possible to use them to remove dirt from hands while on location
when a sink isn't readily available? These have been standard issue in GI
field kits for years now; soldiers claim they love 'em. I guess that means
that those who volunteer for duty aren't manly enough.

On the other hand, I cannot picture Pussy Galore doing anything "girly",
so I hope Honor Blackman kicks that editor's butt.
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228011 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 18:23
ahk  
At 7:39am -0800, 03/01/06, wq [at] email.com wrote:

>Well, when you put it that way, I guess I'll never be able to read
>another CR-related news report and take it seriously again.

It wasn't a news report of any kind. Do we have to wonder about why you
are the type of person who buys gossip rags at the grocery?
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228012 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 18:19
phil.gerrard1  
JHause wrote:

> http://www.kinoweb.de/film2000/GreyOwl/pix/GreyOwl1_L.jpg

Raise ya (it may be wiser to access this one from home - not that that
stopped me):

http://www.phillyburbs.com/valentine/beefcake/connery.shtml

Easy and fun too! In fact, I'm thinking of starting a bondnotbond
website as repository for embarrassing images of Bond actors...

Best

Phil
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228013 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 18:26
ahk  
At 4:17pm -0000, 03/01/06, Paul Clarke <jim_caerleon [at] hotmail.com> wrote:

>Then I'd dredge up candid pics of Brosnan not at his best--you know, with
>goofy looks on his face or showing a double chin or something, the pics
>that tabloids excel at showcasing--and stick them on the site.

Pierce Brosnan once appeared on "The Tonight Show" not looking like
Remington Steele: His hair wasn't perfectly darkened and colored and he
hadn't shaved. Scandolous!
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228014 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 18:27
JHause  
phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
> JHause wrote:
>
> > http://www.kinoweb.de/film2000/GreyOwl/pix/GreyOwl1_L.jpg
>
> Raise ya (it may be wiser to access this one from home - not that that
> stopped me):
>
> http://www.phillyburbs.com/valentine/beefcake/connery.shtml
>
> Easy and fun too! In fact, I'm thinking of starting a bondnotbond
> website as repository for embarrassing images of Bond actors...
>
> Best
>
> Phil

Eyew.......
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228015 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 18:30
phil.gerrard1  
Adam wrote:

> Is it possible to use them to remove dirt from hands while on location
> when a sink isn't readily available? These have been standard issue in GI
> field kits for years now; soldiers claim they love 'em. I guess that means
> that those who volunteer for duty aren't manly enough.

Obviously not, since Craig is still being mocked by the tabloids for
wearing a lifejacket on the boat ride to the press conference - despite
the fact that the Marines who accompanied him were all wearing the
same.

Best

Phil
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228018 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 20:50
neolib007  
WQ wrote:

> He has been berated by Bond fans, had teeth knocked out on set and now
> is suffering from a bout of prickly heat!

> What will go wrong for him next?


Brosnan fans, stop with the Voodoo curses. Throw away
your Craig pin doll and give the man a chance!
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228030 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 22:46
Kent  
"phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com" <phil.gerrard1 [at] ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:1141228362.583856.197950 [at] i39g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
> In fact, I'm starting to find this tabloid stuff amusingly absurd
> rather than annoying. What's going to be the next sign that CR is
> 'jinxed' and that Craig is a wuss? Craig spills his Evian? Craig gets
> bitten by a crew-member's poodle? Craig feels a little ill after
> eating an unripe banana?
>
> Best
>
> Phil

I don't want to feed the flames, but do recall reading Daniel Craig couldn't
drive the old DB5 because it was a manual. The crew were 'shocked' and had
to take the car away to modify it for him.

This never happened to the other fella.... still, who drives stick anymore
anyway? Tiptronic gears is the way to go.

cheers

Kent
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228035 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 23:26
Jabei  
There is no such thing as a Brosnan fan...otherwise all his non-Bond movies
wouldn't flop. There are just a few people who like him as Bond.

Craig will prove that there is room for a return to the good old days when
Bond wasn't just a pretty boy prancing around with a machine gun smirking at
girls.


<neolib007 [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1141242631.192392.58140 [at] i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
> WQ wrote:
>
>> He has been berated by Bond fans, had teeth knocked out on set and now
>> is suffering from a bout of prickly heat!
>
>> What will go wrong for him next?
>
>
> Brosnan fans, stop with the Voodoo curses. Throw away
> your Craig pin doll and give the man a chance!
>
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228036 ] Mi, 01 März 2006 23:50
Tom Zielinski  
"Jabei" <jabei [at] btinternet.com> wrote in message
news:du572b$ssn$1 [at] nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com...
> There is no such thing as a Brosnan fan...otherwise all his non-Bond
> movies wouldn't flop. There are just a few people who like him as Bond.
>
> Craig will prove that there is room for a return to the good old days when
> Bond wasn't just a pretty boy prancing around with a machine gun smirking
> at girls.


I like Brosnan in many non-Bond films. "Fourth Protocol", "Evelyn", "The
Thomas Crown Affair", "The Tailor of Panama", "The Matador." All very good
films, and Brosnan was good if not excellent in all of them.

I think the man is seriously under-rated as an actor.




Tom Zielinski
"...Bond's eyes narrowed. He knew, at some point, he would have to slay this
particular dragon. He settled back in his chair, removing a Morlands' three
ring special from the gunmetal cigarette case. As he waited for the
delicious Balkan/Turkish blend to take effect on his lungs, he reflected
that on the other hand, he also likes the Chicago Cubs..."
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228042 ] Do, 02 März 2006 01:09
ahk  
At 10:26pm -0000, 03/01/06, jabei [at] btinternet.com wrote:

>There is no such thing as a Brosnan fan...otherwise all his non-Bond movies
>wouldn't flop. There are just a few people who like him as Bond.

You couldn't be any more wrong. Brosnan should have won the Oscar for
"Lawnmower Man". Hollywood just doesn't know what it was doing.
Re: Prickly Craig [message #228043 ] Do, 02 März 2006 01:10
phil.gerrard1  
Tom wrote:

> I like Brosnan in many non-Bond films. "Fourth Protocol", "Evelyn", "The
> Thomas Crown Affair", "The Tailor of Panama", "The Matador." All very good
> films, and Brosnan was good if not excellent in all of them.
>
> I think the man is seriously under-rated as an actor.

Agreed, and it's also worth noting that Connery's non-Bond films didn't
exactly set the world on fire (despite some fine performances from Sir
Tam) for a long while. John Boorman has more or less admitted that
Connery did 'Zardoz' because he wasn't being offered much else at the
time. Brosnan just needs a few years to get out from under Bond's
shadow, and then I suspect we'll be able to appreciate him better as an
actor.

I was a Brosnan sceptic before GE came out, but think he did a grand
job. Whatever you think of the movies which have come his way, Bond
and non-Bond, he's always delivered at least the performances the
script demanded, and several times has improved on the material he was
given. That's a pretty damn good record for any working actor.

Best

Phil
Re: Prickly Craig [message #232386 ] Do, 02 März 2006 18:36
Will Traynor  
"phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com" <phil.gerrard1 [at] ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:1141221059.843472.156620 [at] v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
> WQ wrote:
>
>> --- Well, maybe hardly minor. Sure, it's not known to what extent his
>> prickly heat is other than it's driving him crazy, but it could
>> possibly be a percursor to developing an allergy to the sun itself.
>> There are people who are sun-allergic, I happen to know one. She was
>> fine with the sun till her early 30s and then one day, bam, just like
>> that, out of the blue! Skin rash like you wouldn't believe and it's
>> never been the same for her since. She literally has to stay out of
>> it.
>
> I'm sorry for your friend. However, I think it's more likely that
> Craig simply didn't use enough Ambre Solaire, stayed in the sun too
> long, and got burned as a result. That's slightly more common in my
> experience ;-)
>
> Best
>
> Phil
>
> (Reflecting that when you compare what's happened on CR to the
> roll-call of deaths, near-deaths, hospitalisations, and serious
> injuries which have occurred on other Bond films, Craig and company
> have got off pretty lightly so far, and that requests for cheap
> toiletries seem pretty trivial in comparison to requests for limitless
> supplies of cigars or days off filming to play golf.)
>

I can't believe we have a thread about prickly heat, lol. The Craig haters
are getting desperate !!!
Re: Prickly Craig [message #232391 ] Fr, 03 März 2006 05:18
gonzo  
"phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com" <phil.gerrard1 [at] ntlworld.com> wrote in message
news:1141258210.269693.301370 [at] j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Tom wrote:
>
> > I like Brosnan in many non-Bond films. "Fourth Protocol", "Evelyn",
"The
> > Thomas Crown Affair", "The Tailor of Panama", "The Matador." All very
good
> > films, and Brosnan was good if not excellent in all of them.
> >
> > I think the man is seriously under-rated as an actor.
>
> Agreed, and it's also worth noting that Connery's non-Bond films didn't
> exactly set the world on fire (despite some fine performances from Sir
> Tam) for a long while. John Boorman has more or less admitted that
> Connery did 'Zardoz' because he wasn't being offered much else at the
> time. Brosnan just needs a few years to get out from under Bond's
> shadow, and then I suspect we'll be able to appreciate him better as an
> actor.
>
> I was a Brosnan sceptic before GE came out, but think he did a grand
> job. Whatever you think of the movies which have come his way, Bond
> and non-Bond, he's always delivered at least the performances the
> script demanded, and several times has improved on the material he was
> given. That's a pretty damn good record for any working actor.
>
absolutely, compare the connery record after he left bond and before he made
it again in the late 80s with brosnan's and you can see though brosnan isnt
churning out huge hits hes doing some great stuff. the matador just goes to
prove it, the guy CAN act. he is however at a difficult age for an actor,
there isnt much demand for a late middle aged guy, it was only when connery
started to be properly bald and have grey hair his career picked up again.
cheers
james
Vorheriges Thema:NSNA *finally* coming true!
Nächstes Thema:MI6 reports new Craig-related website
Gehe zu:
  


aktuelle Zeit: Fr Mai 25 10:31:13 CEST 2012

Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,03972 Sekunden
.:: Startseite - Hinweise - Impressum ::.

Powered