| Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #225439] |
So, 26 Februar 2006 00:34 |
|
The writers and producers must be *very* embarrassed by an error I just
discovered in Lisa the Vegetarian. Seconds before SLH is seen licking at
the gazpacho, he is seen curled up and resting at the party.
Of course any healthy dog would never sleep with so many strangers in the
yard. He'd be busy running around, visiting with everyone.
Either none of the writers/producers have ever owned a dog, or none of them
have ever had such a social life where they ever have had even one guest at
their home, or they are incompetent writers. For shame.
XINO
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #225440 ] |
So, 26 Februar 2006 02:04 |
|
He was probably tired from explaining the stadium reference to you.
Xino, I like you, but I also like to tease you.
Aaron Xpac3 Mvx3vm
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #225442 ] |
So, 26 Februar 2006 02:38 |
|
|
Probably because there was a big piece of pork in it.
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #225447 ] |
So, 26 Februar 2006 05:34 |
|
> Probably because there was a big piece of pork in it.
What? Specify the objects of your prepositions, Professor.
If "it" is supposed to be the gazpacho, then you have totally missed the
point of my original post.
If "it" is supposed to be the writers, SLH or Lisa, then your post is
nonsensical.
If "it" is supposed to be the vegetarian meals referenced by Linda,
you are wrong because the quote is "You'd be surprised how
often you find a big hunk of pork in them" and not "PIECE of pork in IT".
I don't mean to be rude but I'm just trying to figure out what you're
saying.
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #225450 ] |
So, 26 Februar 2006 18:16 |
|
|
Trab pu kcip
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #225456 ] |
So, 26 Februar 2006 22:10 |
|
Xino Kiner wrote:
> > Probably because there was a big piece of pork in it.
>
> What? Specify the objects of your prepositions, Professor.
>
> If "it" is supposed to be the gazpacho, then you have totally missed the
> point of my original post.
>
> If "it" is supposed to be the writers, SLH or Lisa, then your post is
> nonsensical.
>
> If "it" is supposed to be the vegetarian meals referenced by Linda,
> you are wrong because the quote is "You'd be surprised how
> often you find a big hunk of pork in them" and not "PIECE of pork in IT".
>
> I don't mean to be rude but I'm just trying to figure out what you're
> saying.
A pie for Lord Autumnbottom.
Aaron Xpac3 Mvx3vm
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #225459 ] |
Mo, 27 Februar 2006 01:01 |
|
|
Who said the simpsons were trying to be 100% realistic
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #225482 ] |
Mo, 27 Februar 2006 15:46 |
|
"Funky"
> Who said the simpsons were trying to be 100% realistic
AFAIK, nobody!
In fact if you had read my subject line then you would have seen that I have
said just the OPPOSITE, that there's a mistake.
XINO
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #225484 ] |
Mo, 27 Februar 2006 22:15 |
|
Xino Kiner wrote:
> "Funky"
> > Who said the simpsons were trying to be 100% realistic
>
> AFAIK, nobody!
>
> In fact if you had read my subject line then you would have seen that I have
> said just the OPPOSITE, that there's a mistake.
Ah, but aren't mistakes realistic?!?!
I just blew your mind.
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #225488 ] |
Di, 28 Februar 2006 06:56 |
|
On Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:34:53 -0600, "Xino Kiner"
<isalas79 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>The writers and producers must be *very* embarrassed by an error I just
>discovered in Lisa the Vegetarian. Seconds before SLH is seen licking at
>the gazpacho, he is seen curled up and resting at the party.
>
>Of course any healthy dog would never sleep with so many strangers in the
>yard. He'd be busy running around, visiting with everyone.
Not a biggie. SLH is a lazy son of a bitch.
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #225489 ] |
Di, 28 Februar 2006 06:57 |
|
On 27 Feb 2006 13:15:52 -0800, larrybud2002 [at] yahoo.com wrote:
>
>Xino Kiner wrote:
>> "Funky"
>> > Who said the simpsons were trying to be 100% realistic
>>
>> AFAIK, nobody!
>>
>> In fact if you had read my subject line then you would have seen that I have
>> said just the OPPOSITE, that there's a mistake.
>
>Ah, but aren't mistakes realistic?!?!
>
>I just blew your mind.
Did you at least buy him dinner first?
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #225513 ] |
Mi, 01 März 2006 04:53 |
|
> Ah, but aren't mistakes realistic?!?!
>
> I just blew your mind.
I'm pretty much sure that when Funky wrote "realistic" he meant
"mistake-free". At least that's how I took it.
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #225549 ] |
Do, 02 März 2006 02:11 |
|
LOL!!!!
Now what ep is that from????
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #232573 ] |
Fr, 03 März 2006 00:19 |
|
"Xino Kiner" <isalas79 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1201qeinvurrj11 [at] news.supernews.com...
> The writers and producers must be *very* embarrassed by an error I just
> discovered in Lisa the Vegetarian. Seconds before SLH is seen licking at
> the gazpacho, he is seen curled up and resting at the party.
>
> Of course any healthy dog would never sleep with so many strangers in the
> yard.
Yes he would... if it was OPPOSITE DAY!!
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #232575 ] |
Fr, 03 März 2006 04:22 |
|
> > Of course any healthy dog would never sleep with so many strangers in
the
> > yard.
>
> Yes he would... if it was OPPOSITE DAY!!
>
...if it WERE opposite day.
XINO
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #232583 ] |
Fr, 03 März 2006 15:59 |
|
"Xino Kiner" <isalas79 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:120fdkh1bl00p2b [at] news.supernews.com...
>> > Of course any healthy dog would never sleep with so many strangers in
> the
>> > yard.
>>
>> Yes he would... if it was OPPOSITE DAY!!
>>
Well, it IS Opposite Day... But instead of US telling YOU, we expected YOU
to tell US. So you can see the problem.
>
> ...if it WERE opposite day.
>
Quite correct, Xino. Now write that on the chalk board a hundred times.
-- R Flowers
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #232586 ] |
Fr, 03 März 2006 18:14 |
|
"The Ghost of General Lee" <ghost [at] general.lee> wrote in message
news:7hp702lbvqtokiepq1v6ps9vqc9kctjupq [at] 4ax.com...
> On 27 Feb 2006 13:15:52 -0800, larrybud2002 [at] yahoo.com wrote:
>
>>
>>Xino Kiner wrote:
>>> "Funky"
>>> > Who said the simpsons were trying to be 100% realistic
>>>
>>> AFAIK, nobody!
>>>
>>> In fact if you had read my subject line then you would have seen that I
>>> have
>>> said just the OPPOSITE, that there's a mistake.
>>
>>Ah, but aren't mistakes realistic?!?!
>>
>>I just blew your mind.
>
> Did you at least buy him dinner first?
If Larrybud blew Xino's mind, I would hope that Xino bought Larrybud dinner,
not the other way around.
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #232594 ] |
Sa, 04 März 2006 00:07 |
|
On Fri, 3 Mar 2006 11:14:51 -0600, "That Guy" <7 [at] f.com> wrote:
>
>"The Ghost of General Lee" <ghost [at] general.lee> wrote in message
>news:7hp702lbvqtokiepq1v6ps9vqc9kctjupq [at] 4ax.com...
>> On 27 Feb 2006 13:15:52 -0800, larrybud2002 [at] yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Xino Kiner wrote:
>>>> "Funky"
>>>> > Who said the simpsons were trying to be 100% realistic
>>>>
>>>> AFAIK, nobody!
>>>>
>>>> In fact if you had read my subject line then you would have seen that I
>>>> have
>>>> said just the OPPOSITE, that there's a mistake.
>>>
>>>Ah, but aren't mistakes realistic?!?!
>>>
>>>I just blew your mind.
>>
>> Did you at least buy him dinner first?
>
>
>If Larrybud blew Xino's mind, I would hope that Xino bought Larrybud dinner,
>not the other way around.
>
I guess that would depend on who enjoyed it more.;-)
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #232629 ] |
So, 05 März 2006 04:51 |
|
"R Flowers"
> Well, it IS Opposite Day... But instead of US telling YOU, we expected YOU
> to tell US. So you can see the problem.
No I can't. Sounds like a bunch of nonsense. By what authority do you
proclaim that today is Opposite Day? Certainly it is not mine.
> > ...if it WERE opposite day.
> Quite correct, Xino. Now write that on the chalk board a hundred times.
No, That Guy should write it one hundred times. He's the one who's
responsible for the blunder.
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #232630 ] |
So, 05 März 2006 05:02 |
|
> If Larrybud blew Xino's mind, I would hope that Xino bought
> Larrybud dinner, not the other way around.
If Mr. Bud had blown my mind, it would have pleased me greatly to offer
him dinner. But in fact his riposte was irrelevant. It is a true
statement, of course, but since it doesn't apply to the original discussion
he gets nothing.
XINO
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #232650 ] |
Mo, 06 März 2006 09:44 |
|
>Group: alt.tv.simpsons Date: Sat, Feb
> 25, 2006, 5:34pm From:
> isalas79 [at] hotmail.com (Xino=A0Kiner)
>Of course any healthy dog would never
> sleep with so many strangers in the
> yard. He'd be busy running around,
> visiting with everyone.
Who said he was healthy?
Darren Hayes had a dog but that bitch of an ex-wife got if from him in
the divorce
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #232658 ] |
Mo, 06 März 2006 18:40 |
|
"Xino Kiner" <isalas79 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:120kom1cb519eef [at] news.supernews.com...
> "R Flowers"
>
>> Well, it IS Opposite Day... But instead of US telling YOU, we expected
>> YOU
>> to tell US. So you can see the problem.
>
> No I can't. Sounds like a bunch of nonsense. By what authority do you
> proclaim that today is Opposite Day? Certainly it is not mine.
>
>
>> > ...if it WERE opposite day.
>
>> Quite correct, Xino. Now write that on the chalk board a hundred times.
>
> No, That Guy should write it one hundred times. He's the one who's
> responsible for the blunder.
>
>
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
It were opposite day.
|
|
|
| Re: Mistake in Lisa the Vegetarian [message #232713 ] |
Fr, 10 März 2006 00:30 |
|
"That Guy"
> It were opposite day.
> It were opposite day.
> It were opposite day.
> It were opposite day.
> It were opposite day.
I can't believe it. You've actually found a
practical use for cut and paste.
|
|
|
