| Video proof that Craig doesn't look the part and has no charm [message #225117] |
Fr, 17 Februar 2006 22:59 |
|
1) Craig lacks the right look for the part:
Evidence - Nine second clip from Archangel. ALthough Craig will look a
little different in CR, it's fair to say his face size and features
will remain the same:
http://s53.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=01Q9MGL7XI9YS2XDKV6XB3VOO 0
2) Craig has zero charm:
Evidence - this 14 second scene from Archangel. If Craig is anything
like this, he will be hilariously woeful as Bond:
http://s32.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=2XSMVR3IQJ3Y03SA149RP2THT G
He is about as charming and charismatic as a wet weekend.
Craig will be like that in CR, I am certain of it. To give him the
benefit of the doubt, perhaps he'll be a bit more confident and
charismatic but hardly anything worth shouting about. He's one of the
most uncharismatic leading actors I have ever seen. Has zero presence
on screen and I've seen him in Archangel, Layer Cake and Sylvia.
He will fail as Bond and so will Casino Royale.
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: Video proof that Craig doesn't look the part and has no charm [message #225118 ] |
Fr, 17 Februar 2006 23:05 |
|
Craig is, without doubt, *THE* worst casting in the history of motion
pictures. A brilliantly insane casting decision by Eon Productions and
Sony Picutures. Inspired lunacy.
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: Video proof that Craig doesn't look the part and has no charm [message #225119 ] |
Fr, 17 Februar 2006 23:06 |
|
Craig is, without doubt, *THE* worst casting in the history of motion
pictures. A brilliantly insane casting decision by Eon Productions and
Sony Pictures. Inspired lunacy.
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: Video proof that Craig doesn't look the part and has no charm [message #225120 ] |
Fr, 17 Februar 2006 23:06 |
|
Craig is, without doubt, *THE* worst casting in the history of motion
pictures. A brilliantly insane casting decision by Eon Productions and
Sony Pictures. Inspired lunacy.
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: Video proof that Craig doesn't look the part and has no charm [message #225121 ] |
Fr, 17 Februar 2006 23:06 |
|
Craig is, without doubt, *THE* worst casting in the history of motion
pictures. A brilliantly insane casting decision by Eon Productions and
Sony Pictures. Inspired lunacy.
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: Video proof that Craig doesn't look the part and has no charm [message #225122 ] |
Fr, 17 Februar 2006 23:08 |
|
Nothing like repeating yourself. LOL
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: Video proof that Craig doesn't look the part and has no charm [message #227670 ] |
Fr, 24 Februar 2006 15:30 |
|
After quite a few wodka martinis La La Cupcake (the unknown teletubby)
wrote:
> 1) Craig lacks the right look for the part:
In what way? His looks - save the hair colour - are quite close to the
Bond of the books, who isn't a model either.
> 2) Craig has zero charm:
I know quite a few intelligent and attractive young women who think
otherwise.
> He will fail as Bond and so will Casino Royale.
It's way to early to tell. You know the fun thing? I was on this
newsgroup 12 years ago when Pierce Brosnan was announced as James Bond,
and several posters took the same views ("Pierce Brosnan will fail and
so will...") you vent now.
Cedric
|
|
|
| Re: Video proof that Craig doesn't look the part and has no charm [message #227684 ] |
Fr, 24 Februar 2006 17:27 |
|
<cedrics007 [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1140791425.792635.3690 [at] v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com...
>
> After quite a few wodka martinis La La Cupcake (the unknown teletubby)
> wrote:
>
>> 1) Craig lacks the right look for the part:
>
> In what way? His looks - save the hair colour - are quite close to the
> Bond of the books, who isn't a model either.
>
>> 2) Craig has zero charm:
>
> I know quite a few intelligent and attractive young women who think
> otherwise.
>
>> He will fail as Bond and so will Casino Royale.
>
> It's way to early to tell. You know the fun thing? I was on this
> newsgroup 12 years ago when Pierce Brosnan was announced as James Bond,
> and several posters took the same views ("Pierce Brosnan will fail and
> so will...") you vent now.
>
> Cedric
>
This anti-Craig stuff is so much baloney, it's laughable. I can't believe
people are even responding to such nonsense. When it becomes apparent that
there is no way to sway the naysayers it is time to pack your bags and move
on. I lost my patience trying to reason with them a few weeks ago. This will
continue on for another eight months. When the movie comes out, they won't
like that either. It's just a bunch of internet malcontents with too much
time on their hands. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz............
|
|
|
| Re: Video proof that Craig doesn't look the part and has no charm [message #227697 ] |
Fr, 24 Februar 2006 19:13 |
|
Will wrote:
> This anti-Craig stuff is so much baloney, it's laughable. I can't believe
> people are even responding to such nonsense. When it becomes apparent that
> there is no way to sway the naysayers it is time to pack your bags and move
> on. I lost my patience trying to reason with them a few weeks ago. This will
> continue on for another eight months. When the movie comes out, they won't
> like that either. It's just a bunch of internet malcontents with too much
> time on their hands. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz............
Yeah. Killfiles are a beautiful thing.
|
|
|
| Re: Video proof that Craig doesn't look the part and has no charm [message #227725 ] |
Sa, 25 Februar 2006 00:35 |
|
"cedrics007 [at] yahoo.com" <cedrics007 [at] yahoo.com> said:
>In what way? His looks - save the hair colour - are quite close to the
>Bond of the books, who isn't a model either.
>I know quite a few intelligent and attractive young women who think
>otherwise.
>It's way to early to tell. You know the fun thing? I was on this
>newsgroup 12 years ago when Pierce Brosnan was announced as James Bond,
>and several posters took the same views ("Pierce Brosnan will fail and
>so will...") you vent now.
Cedric, scojo is a long-time troll on this group. Who knows what his real
opinions are, as they have been known to change with the wind. All he
cares about is filling the newsgroup with nonsense. Your best bet is to
ignore him, or better yet killfile him like everyone else has.
|
|
|
