| Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #224958] |
Do, 16 Februar 2006 13:38 |
|
Here is a higher detail photo of Craig as Bond:
http://img111.imageshack.us/img111/4319/craighigherdetail19w x.jpg
Note how his face is considerably smaller than the five previous Bond
actors. He doesn't have the more alpha male quality.
Compare his face to the new Le Chiffre actor Mads Mikkelsen:
http://show.imagehosting.us/show/1172217/0/nouser_1172/T0_-1 _1172217.jpg
He looks far too wimpy.
See what I mean?
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #224960 ] |
Do, 16 Februar 2006 13:52 |
|
Craig is totally miscast and it will be a mircale - and I do mean that
word - if Craig and CR are a big hit. As soon as Le Chiffre faces Craig
people may laugh and go, "Craig is gonna beat up this Le Chiffre? LOL."
That reaction could happen.
You need a more masculine looking man as Bond. Forget 'craggy', forget
'weathered-looking', it's meaningless if the guy has a small face -
which Craig has. Craig's small face destroys any credibile realistic
belief he is James Bond - licensed to kill.
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #224961 ] |
Do, 16 Februar 2006 13:57 |
|
Craig is totally miscast and it will be a miralce - and I do mean that
word - if Craig and CR are a big hit. As soon as Le Chiffre faces Craig
people may laugh and go, "Craig is gonna beat up this Le Chiffre? LOL."
That reaction could happen.
You need a more masculine looking man as Bond. Forget 'craggy', forget
'weathered-looking', it's meaningless if the guy has a small face -
which Craig has. Craig's small face destroys any credibile realistic
belief he is James Bond - licensed to kill.
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #224962 ] |
Do, 16 Februar 2006 14:04 |
|
Craig is totally miscast and it will be a miracle - and I do mean that
word - if Craig and CR are a big hit. As soon as Le Chiffre faces Craig
people may laugh and go, "Craig is gonna beat up this Le Chiffre? LOL."
That reaction could happen.
You need a more masculine looking man as Bond. Forget 'craggy', forget
'weathered-looking', it's meaningless if the guy has a small face -
which Craig has. Craig's small face destroys any credibile realistic
belief he is James Bond - licensed to kill.
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #224963 ] |
Do, 16 Februar 2006 13:47 |
|
"La La Cupcake (the unknown teletubby)"
> See what I mean?
No.
|
|
|
| Re: Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #224964 ] |
Do, 16 Februar 2006 14:07 |
|
http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/2645/craigvsmads5bp.jpg
That link should open.
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #224965 ] |
Do, 16 Februar 2006 14:15 |
|
Go watch the last 20 Bond films and compare the Bond actors' faces with
most of the other men on screen. You will find Bond's face is larger
than most of them. Go take a look. Any Bond film, doesn't matter which.
Now go look at Craig in Munich, Layer Cake, Archangel and see how he
has a weaker, smaller face.
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #224966 ] |
Do, 16 Februar 2006 14:38 |
|
"La La Cupcake (the unknown teletubby)" <booby [at] myself.com> wrote in message
news:1140095711.355553.104220 [at] o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> Go watch the last 20 Bond films and compare the Bond actors' faces with
> most of the other men on screen.
What's your point? The smaller the face the less masculine?
Masculinity has NOTHING to do with looks itself. It's how you behave, walk,
talk and so forth.
Danny De Vito is more masculine than Nathan Lane. Get the point?
- Zeki
|
|
|
| Re: Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #224972 ] |
Do, 16 Februar 2006 17:58 |
|
http://img115.imageshack.us/img115/7280/craighigherdetail113 00x9757qy.jpg
Craig up close and too personal.
!!
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #224976 ] |
Do, 16 Februar 2006 18:06 |
|
If you gave him white hair he'd look really old. He looks too old as it
is to be in Bond Begins so I'm not sure why's been cast.
???????????????????
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #224977 ] |
Do, 16 Februar 2006 18:07 |
|
Not sure why I can't type today too.
:)
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #224978 ] |
Do, 16 Februar 2006 18:10 |
|
Zeki wrote:
> "La La Cupcake (the unknown teletubby)" <booby [at] myself.com> wrote in message
> news:1140095711.355553.104220 [at] o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> > Go watch the last 20 Bond films and compare the Bond actors' faces with
> > most of the other men on screen.
>
> What's your point? The smaller the face the less masculine?
>
> Masculinity has NOTHING to do with looks itself. It's how you behave, walk,
> talk and so forth.
>
> Danny De Vito is more masculine than Nathan Lane. Get the point?
>
> - Zeki
Ignore him. He's an idiot trolling for attention. He's a Rainman-like
closet case who worries about wrinkles and cheekbones all day. "Acting?
Never heard of it. James Bond is very sparkly."
|
|
|
| Re: Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #224979 ] |
Do, 16 Februar 2006 18:10 |
|
La La Cupcake (the unknown teletubby) wrote:
> Not sure why I can't type today too.
>
> :)
>
> LLC
Because you're an idiot.
|
|
|
| Re: Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #225000 ] |
Fr, 17 Februar 2006 00:00 |
|
"JHause" <JHause [at] aol.com> said:
>La La Cupcake (the unknown teletubby) wrote:
>> Not sure why I can't type today too.
>Because you're an idiot.
Please don't feed the trolls. The rest of us are blissfully unaware of his
existence until you do this.
|
|
|
| Re: Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #225001 ] |
Fr, 17 Februar 2006 00:01 |
|
"Zeki" <zeki [at] _.dk> said:
>What's your point? The smaller the face the less masculine?
>Masculinity has NOTHING to do with looks itself. It's how you behave, walk,
>talk and so forth.
>Danny De Vito is more masculine than Nathan Lane. Get the point?
Please don't feed the trolls. The rest of us are blissfully unaware of his
existence until you do this.
|
|
|
| Re: Craig is too wimpy to be Bond - Bond vs Le Chiffre - the proof [message #225018 ] |
Fr, 17 Februar 2006 02:22 |
|
Zeki wrote:
> "La La Cupcake (the unknown teletubby)" <booby [at] myself.com> wrote in message
> news:1140095711.355553.104220 [at] o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> > Go watch the last 20 Bond films and compare the Bond actors' faces with
> > most of the other men on screen.
>
> What's your point? The smaller the face the less masculine?
>
> Masculinity has NOTHING to do with looks itself. It's how you behave, walk,
> talk and so forth.
>
> Danny De Vito is more masculine than Nathan Lane. Get the point?
>
> - Zeki
I totally agree with you, Zeki. Craig may not even have much in the
looks dept. but he does look tough and as though he is from a military
background, having completed many dangerous missions. I see that in
him.
Cam
|
|
|
