| People say Craig looks tough. Here, I can prove he doesn't and it will shock you! [message #216452] |
Mo, 06 Februar 2006 06:12 |
|
Australian actress Kimberley Davies is more confident and stronger a
woman than Craig is a man. Here:
Kim Davies' face size:
http://img95.imageshack.us/img95/542/vlcsnap5195596gu.png
Daniel Craig's face size:
http://www.nndb.com/people/301/000104986/daniel-craig-1-size d.jpg
Her face is far larger and this denotes greater balance of personality.
Kim is far more charming and confident a woman than Craig is a man.
It's all in the face size, you see. Oh yes. I am professor of face
sizes.:)
Now you see why Craig is so miscast. There are women with stronger
faces than him. The idea Craig looks tough is ridiculous. Heck, Kim
Davies has a stronger face and she is a female. That says it all!
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: People say Craig looks tough. Here, I can prove he doesn't and it will shock you! [message #216453 ] |
Mo, 06 Februar 2006 12:12 |
|
Whoever that Kimberley Davies woman is - she's horrible - she looks
like a plastic blow-up doll - yuk!
|
|
|
| Re: People say Craig looks tough. Here, I can prove he doesn't and it will shock you! [message #216455 ] |
Mo, 06 Februar 2006 12:49 |
|
Horrible? She has the most beautiful side profile of any woman that's
ever lived. Proof:
http://img67.imageshack.us/img67/916/vlcsnap5214525tu.png
Harldy a plastic doll. Think the term you're looking for is classically
beautiful woman.
LLC
|
|
|
| Re: People say Craig looks tough. Here, I can prove he doesn't and it will shock you! [message #218810 ] |
Mo, 06 Februar 2006 15:39 |
|
Oh Scojy baby.... you were so much more entertaining when you weren't
so obsessed with Craig's facial features. Yes we know he was an
appaling choice, yes we know the producers have no clue and never will
have as long as they have a hole in their ass, and yes we will see them
kill this franchise, but you know what, let em, who cares? It's been
sh*t ever since Connery left, let's be honest. Get over it, and get
back to writing your pieces as hilaaaaaaaaaarious as the post Mike
Feeney just did.. Ya see how he does it and they don't put 'TROLL'? and
when you do it you get abuse? Go figure huh.... At least you USED to be
funny until you got obsessive about Sid James as Bond. It's over, face
it. But you will have the last laugh when Casino gets slated by every
critic in the world for hiring a dustman to play James Bond..
Good work Eor Ploductions
|
|
|
| Re: People say Craig looks tough. Here, I can prove he doesn't and it will shock you! [message #218815 ] |
Mo, 06 Februar 2006 17:48 |
|
"Lord Basildon" <lordbasildon [at] hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1139236781.229059.18120 [at] z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Oh Scojy baby.... you were so much more entertaining when you weren't
> so obsessed with Craig's facial features. Yes we know he was an
> appaling choice, yes we know the producers have no clue and never will
> have as long as they have a hole in their ass, and yes we will see them
> kill this franchise, but you know what, let em, who cares? It's been
> sh*t ever since Connery left, let's be honest. Get over it, and get
> back to writing your pieces as hilaaaaaaaaaarious as the post Mike
> Feeney just did.. Ya see how he does it and they don't put 'TROLL'? and
> when you do it you get abuse? Go figure huh....
Mike Feeney is an intelligent and classy guy, an excellent writer, and
funny as hell.
Let us know when the Sc*jo character comes around to anything resembling
that.
Until then, "Lord"...
<Plonk>
|
|
|
| Re: People say Craig looks tough. Here, I can prove he doesn't and it will shock you! [message #218843 ] |
Di, 07 Februar 2006 02:37 |
|
That's because he IS a troll and Mike is NOT. One of them is a long-time
contributor to this newsgroup who has posted many intelligent, witty and
insightful points over the years, and who has a wonderful sense of humor
that provides a poignant, sharp and a positive atmosphere in this group.
The other one is scojo.
"Lord Basildon" <lordbasildon [at] hotmail.co.uk> said:
>Oh Scojy baby.... you were so much more entertaining when you weren't
>so obsessed with Craig's facial features. Yes we know he was an
>appaling choice, yes we know the producers have no clue and never will
>have as long as they have a hole in their ass, and yes we will see them
>kill this franchise, but you know what, let em, who cares? It's been
>sh*t ever since Connery left, let's be honest. Get over it, and get
>back to writing your pieces as hilaaaaaaaaaarious as the post Mike
>Feeney just did.. Ya see how he does it and they don't put 'TROLL'? and
>when you do it you get abuse? Go figure huh.... At least you USED to be
>funny until you got obsessive about Sid James as Bond. It's over, face
>it. But you will have the last laugh when Casino gets slated by every
>critic in the world for hiring a dustman to play James Bond..
>
>Good work Eor Ploductions
|
|
|
| Re: People say Craig looks tough. Here, I can prove he doesn't and it will shock you! [message #218851 ] |
Di, 07 Februar 2006 16:55 |
|
OK, I get it. Anyone who admits to liking Moonraker must have a great
sense of humour, yeh?
Rich Handley wrote:
> That's because he IS a troll and Mike is NOT. One of them is a long-time
> contributor to this newsgroup who has posted many intelligent, witty and
> insightful points over the years, and who has a wonderful sense of humor
> that provides a poignant, sharp and a positive atmosphere in this group.
> The other one is scojo.
|
|
|
| Re: People say Craig looks tough. Here, I can prove he doesn't and it will shock you! [message #218857 ] |
Di, 07 Februar 2006 20:56 |
|
Tom Z clearly articulated the following:
"I should also add, Mr. Feeney articulates and defends his views on
Bond in which he truly believes. He does not post rumours and "fact"
and other crap in an infantile and misguided attempt to rile the NG.
THAT is the definition of a troll. "
To which Lord Basildon replied
"Tom, thanks for clearing that up yeh."
And then later in the same thread said:
"OK, I get it. Anyone who admits to liking Moonraker must have a great
sense of humour, yeh? "
"Yeh"? Is that how you chaps in SMERSH talk now? Did you mean "yeah",
as in "She Loves You" by the Beatles?
I am going to have to start using eyemuffs to read your posts, old man.
By the way. I know Mike Feeney. I like Mike Feeney. Scojo or his
current nom de plume is no Mike Feeney.
Thus endeth the lesson for the day.
|
|
|
| Re: People say Craig looks tough. Here, I can prove he doesn't and it will shock you! [message #218863 ] |
Mi, 08 Februar 2006 00:10 |
|
"Lord Basildon" <lordbasildon [at] hotmail.co.uk> said:
>OK, I get it. Anyone who admits to liking Moonraker must have a great
>sense of humour, yeh?
Quite the opposite, I'd say.
|
|
|
| Re: People say Craig looks tough. Here, I can prove he doesn't and it will shock you! [message #218900 ] |
Do, 09 Februar 2006 02:29 |
|
A sense of humor involves just saying the joke and letting it speak for
itself. Scojoke says the same thing over and over again, responding to his
own posts, and floods the newsgroup with posts about himself being Bond or
his connections through his "brother" and how we can cut off his head and
use it as a football if he is wrong (which he always is). And trust me, he
isn't being self-deprecating; Scojoke's ego IS that big.
Draugnar
"Lord Basildon" <lordbasildon [at] hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
news:1139327757.681890.81980 [at] g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> OK, I get it. Anyone who admits to liking Moonraker must have a great
> sense of humour, yeh?
>
>
> Rich Handley wrote:
>> That's because he IS a troll and Mike is NOT. One of them is a long-time
>> contributor to this newsgroup who has posted many intelligent, witty and
>> insightful points over the years, and who has a wonderful sense of humor
>> that provides a poignant, sharp and a positive atmosphere in this group.
>> The other one is scojo.
>
|
|
|
