| New Trek Movie Rumors [message #213095] |
So, 05 Februar 2006 04:44 |
|
http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/star %20trek%20supermovie
Claims to bring together TOS and NextGen characters. Sounds too good to be
true.
Bo Raxo
--
"My only solace is that in the future, you will be played in movies and
television series by character actors who otherwise specialize in pedophile
and serial killer roles. And they will hesitate to take the job." - John
Rogers talking about Karl Rove.
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #213096 ] |
So, 05 Februar 2006 04:48 |
|
Bo Raxo wrote:
> http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/star %20trek%20supermovie
>
> Claims to bring together TOS and NextGen characters. Sounds too good to be
> true.
What the heck! :)
But I still don't know why sexy ~young~ *new* actors can't be tapped to
play the TOS roles.
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #213097 ] |
So, 05 Februar 2006 05:04 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #213098 ] |
So, 05 Februar 2006 05:07 |
|
"ToolPackinMama" <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote in message
news:RbqdnWnhG5Ph6HjeRVn-tw [at] comcast.com...
> Bo Raxo wrote:
>> http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/star %20trek%20supermovie
>>
>> Claims to bring together TOS and NextGen characters. Sounds too good to
>> be
>> true.
>
> What the heck! :)
>
> But I still don't know why sexy ~young~ *new* actors can't be tapped to
> play the TOS roles.
Why *not* beat a dead horse... o_O
Blech. I guess /someone's/ got to waste $100 mil.
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #213099 ] |
So, 05 Februar 2006 05:37 |
|
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 03:44:34 GMT, "Bo Raxo"
<invasions_r_us [at] thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote:
>
> http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/star %20trek%20supermovie
>
>Claims to bring together TOS and NextGen characters. Sounds too good to be
>true.
>
>
>Bo Raxo
Oh gawd, as if we need more story idea retreads.
This sort of thing was already done, and not particularly well.
I honestly don't know if another Trek movie would be worth the
trouble. The 3 series that didn't even get a movie (DS9, Voyager, and
Enterprise) either wrapped things up in such a way as to render movie
ideas difficult to use, or just plain didn't deserve a movie. While
the end of Enterprise left enough time to fit a movie in, is anyone
actually going to go see it? (Yea, I know, they're talking about
Shatner and Stewart, but I just can't see that working...an Ent movie
might be workable, but I ain't holding my breath.. )
Gawd, I remember when seeing the announcement of a new Trek movie made
me go "Cool! I wanna see that.. " Now, it's like "Hmmm, maybe I'll
rent it...if I have nothing better to do.. "
-LMB
The reason congressmen try so hard to get re-elected is that they
would hate to have to make a living under the laws they've passed.
Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs should relax
and get used to the idea.
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #213110 ] |
So, 05 Februar 2006 15:10 |
|
If I had a dollar for every rumor that said that movie was being made with
the TOS characters. Or that there's going to be a movie about Starfleet
Academy. Or a movie set after the TNG era. Or on a Klingon bird of prey.
"Bo Raxo" <invasions_r_us [at] thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote in message
news:CweFf.10342$1n4.3105 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
>
http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/star %20trek%20superm
ovie
>
> Claims to bring together TOS and NextGen characters. Sounds too good to
be
> true.
>
>
> Bo Raxo
> --
> "My only solace is that in the future, you will be played in movies and
> television series by character actors who otherwise specialize in
pedophile
> and serial killer roles. And they will hesitate to take the job." - John
> Rogers talking about Karl Rove.
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #213114 ] |
So, 05 Februar 2006 20:42 |
|
In article <CweFf.10342$1n4.3105 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>, "Bo Raxo" <invasions_r_us [at] thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote:
>
> http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/star %20trek%20supermovi
>e
>
>Claims to bring together TOS and NextGen characters. Sounds too good to be
>true.
The only one i'd care to see would be spock. everyone else is 400 pounds
overweight or dead jim.
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #213118 ] |
So, 05 Februar 2006 21:38 |
|
"Bo Raxo" <invasions_r_us [at] thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote in message
news:CweFf.10342$1n4.3105 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/star %20trek%20supermovie
>
> Claims to bring together TOS and NextGen characters. Sounds too good to
> be
> true.
>
>
> Bo Raxo
> --
> "My only solace is that in the future, you will be played in movies and
> television series by character actors who otherwise specialize in
> pedophile
> and serial killer roles. And they will hesitate to take the job." - John
> Rogers talking about Karl Rove.
>
>
Tom Hanks really wanted to play Zephram Cochrane, but couldn't due to
scheduling conflict. Let Hanks have a crack at Trek. Couldn't hurt!
ITTOD
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #213120 ] |
Mo, 06 Februar 2006 01:51 |
|
I wouldn't hold my breath on any of this, guys.
No substantiation, no link, no source, nothing. And, to be honest, why
would calling it a "supermovie" bring out any more people than the last
one?
Wish Trek *were* coming back, but I just don't believe it. Problem is
that its day has passed.
-intrepid
In Through The Out Door wrote:
> "Bo Raxo" <invasions_r_us [at] thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote in message
> news:CweFf.10342$1n4.3105 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> >
> > http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/star %20trek%20supermovie
> >
> > Claims to bring together TOS and NextGen characters. Sounds too good to
> > be
> > true.
> >
> >
> > Bo Raxo
> > --
> > "My only solace is that in the future, you will be played in movies and
> > television series by character actors who otherwise specialize in
> > pedophile
> > and serial killer roles. And they will hesitate to take the job." - John
> > Rogers talking about Karl Rove.
> >
> >
>
> Tom Hanks really wanted to play Zephram Cochrane, but couldn't due to
> scheduling conflict. Let Hanks have a crack at Trek. Couldn't hurt!
>
> ITTOD
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #213121 ] |
Mo, 06 Februar 2006 02:20 |
|
<intrepid_dw [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1139187105.417318.110500 [at] g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>I wouldn't hold my breath on any of this, guys.
>
> No substantiation, no link, no source, nothing. And, to be honest, why
> would calling it a "supermovie" bring out any more people than the last
> one?
>
> Wish Trek *were* coming back, but I just don't believe it. Problem is
> that its day has passed.
Rubbish. The "day [that] has passed" involves the current status quo - the
current characters, played by the current actors (TOS being either old or
unfortunately deceased, TNG getting too old, VOY / DS9 / ENT of no audience
interest) controlled by the current production system.
Quality Star Trek stories "passed"? Never. But there's the clause -
/quality/ - attached to a combination of production and acting that can
actually pull the story off.
And that's what is missing today.
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #213122 ] |
Mo, 06 Februar 2006 06:55 |
|
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 03:44:34 GMT, "Bo Raxo"
<invasions_r_us [at] thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote:
>
> http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/star %20trek%20supermovie
>
>Claims to bring together TOS and NextGen characters. Sounds too good to be
>true.
>
>
>Bo Raxo
Wow! I would go if both destroyed each other and they both blowed up
real goooooooooooooooooooooooood!!! Yeeee haaaaa.
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #213125 ] |
Mo, 06 Februar 2006 07:58 |
|
"Bo Raxo" <invasions_r_us [at] thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote in message
news:CweFf.10342$1n4.3105 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
>
http://www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/star %20trek%20supermovie
>
> Claims to bring together TOS and NextGen characters. Sounds too good to
be
> true.
>
>
> Bo Raxo
The time frame would be very interesting alright. The older guys can't
play themselves as young men anymore. Picard would be an admiral, and he'd
somehow have to check in with Shatner in the past, but before he died.
Spock wears really heavy makeup, but still looks older than his dad ever
did! I'm sure with sci-fi there would be someway to do it.
--
"Don't get me wrong... I'm SNARKY"
JK Sinrod
Sinrod Stained Glass Studios
www.sinrodstudios.com
Coney Island Memories
www.sinrodstudios.com/coneymemories
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #213127 ] |
Mo, 06 Februar 2006 12:05 |
|
"Benjamin Pavsner" <pavsnerp [at] bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:rEnFf.23373$3m4.8904 [at] bignews5.bellsouth.net...
> If I had a dollar for every rumor that said that movie was being made with
> the TOS characters. Or that there's going to be a movie about Starfleet
> Academy. Or a movie set after the TNG era. Or on a Klingon bird of prey.
personally i think a star trek klingon movie would be kinda cool, but
considering it would only attract hardcore trek fans and maybe a small
subset of the goth subculture i dont really see it happening ( not that you
were trying to suggest it would mind you).
a thought occurs in the klingon agent in broken bow had landed in australia
he wouldnt of been shot, he'd have been pissed as a newt though.
cheers
fozzi
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #217018 ] |
Mo, 06 Februar 2006 17:05 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #217020 ] |
Mo, 06 Februar 2006 19:35 |
|
> personally i think a star trek klingon movie would be kinda cool, but
> considering it would only attract hardcore trek fans and maybe a small
> subset of the goth subculture i dont really see it happening ( not that you
> were trying to suggest it would mind you).
Any Klingon Trek movie would also have human characters, as well
as Vulcans and other species. I had a thought -- a movie in which
the Federation captain is Klingon. Maybe Worf.
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #217022 ] |
Mo, 06 Februar 2006 22:19 |
|
"Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
news:AFMFf.25570$VV4.203118 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>> personally i think a star trek klingon movie would be kinda cool, but
>> considering it would only attract hardcore trek fans and maybe a small
>> subset of the goth subculture i dont really see it happening ( not that
>> you were trying to suggest it would mind you).
>
> Any Klingon Trek movie would also have human characters, as well as
> Vulcans and other species. I had a thought -- a movie in which the
> Federation captain is Klingon. Maybe Worf.
How about less Foreheads du jur and more *real* aliens? What about all the
fantastic aliens we saw in TAS plus some of the aliens seen in the
Federation Council in ST:TVH?
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #217023 ] |
Mo, 06 Februar 2006 22:29 |
|
"Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
news:AFMFf.25570$VV4.203118 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> > personally i think a star trek klingon movie would be kinda cool, but
> > considering it would only attract hardcore trek fans and maybe a small
> > subset of the goth subculture i dont really see it happening ( not that
you
> > were trying to suggest it would mind you).
>
> Any Klingon Trek movie would also have human characters, as well
> as Vulcans and other species. I had a thought -- a movie in which
> the Federation captain is Klingon. Maybe Worf.
Like I've said before a Klingon movie (at least a PG 13) set either just
after the Kitomer Accord where Captain Sulu could make a cameo, or (my
favourite) right after DS9 following Martok (and Worf) back to Qonos.
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
"So say we all!"
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #217025 ] |
Mo, 06 Februar 2006 22:51 |
|
>>>personally i think a star trek klingon movie would be kinda cool, but
>>>>> considering it would only attract hardcore trek fans and maybe a small
>>>>> subset of the goth subculture i dont really see it happening ( not that
>>>>> you were trying to suggest it would mind you).
>>
>>>
>>> Any Klingon Trek movie would also have human characters, as well as
>>> Vulcans and other species. I had a thought -- a movie in which the
>>> Federation captain is Klingon. Maybe Worf.
>
>
> How about less Foreheads du jur and more *real* aliens? What about all the
> fantastic aliens we saw in TAS plus some of the aliens seen in the
> Federation Council in ST:TVH?
I think maybe we've got enough aliens. Sure, they can bring in the
odd new species, but they should work with some of the species
they've come up with. I never liked seeing a new alien species
every week on Voyager.
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #217046 ] |
Mi, 08 Februar 2006 15:58 |
|
"Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
news:PxPFf.25677$VV4.205473 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>>>>personally i think a star trek klingon movie would be kinda cool, but
>>>>>> considering it would only attract hardcore trek fans and maybe a
>>>>>> small subset of the goth subculture i dont really see it happening
>>>>>> ( not that you were trying to suggest it would mind you).
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any Klingon Trek movie would also have human characters, as well as
>>>> Vulcans and other species. I had a thought -- a movie in which the
>>>> Federation captain is Klingon. Maybe Worf.
>>
>>
>> How about less Foreheads du jur and more *real* aliens? What about all
>> the fantastic aliens we saw in TAS plus some of the aliens seen in the
>> Federation Council in ST:TVH?
>
> I think maybe we've got enough aliens. Sure, they can bring in the odd new
> species, but they should work with some of the species they've come up
> with. I never liked seeing a new alien species every week on Voyager.
Beats the hell out of the TNG's tendancy to have them stumble on a random
planet inhabited by humans! I always wondered if they were hinting at
intelligent design there, for it would seem otherwise impossible for the
same creature to arise and evolve at the same time on a remote planet with
different conditions than earth. Actually, how likely would it be for every
creature to have evolved with cephalization, bipodism, etc? Every startrek
alien (with a couple exceptions) are simian in body structure. Coincidence?
I always thought starwars was more realistic in this regard, with creatures
like Jabba and Twato.
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #217047 ] |
Mi, 08 Februar 2006 16:08 |
|
"Jennifer Blaustein" <J.Blaustein [at] rockaway.net> wrote in message
news:tGnGf.11$jz1.3 [at] fe12.lga...
>
> "Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
> news:PxPFf.25677$VV4.205473 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>> I think maybe we've got enough aliens. Sure, they can bring in the odd
>> new species, but they should work with some of the species they've come
>> up with. I never liked seeing a new alien species every week on Voyager.
>
> Beats the hell out of the TNG's tendancy to have them stumble on a random
> planet inhabited by humans! I always wondered if they were hinting at
> intelligent design there, for it would seem otherwise impossible for the
> same creature to arise and evolve at the same time on a remote planet with
> different conditions than earth. Actually, how likely would it be for
> every creature to have evolved with cephalization, bipodism, etc? Every
> startrek alien (with a couple exceptions) are simian in body structure.
> Coincidence?
I guess you missed the episode explaining "The Preservers".
....a nice excuse for easy-to-make Foreheads du Jour! ^_^
> I always thought starwars was more realistic in this regard, with
> creatures like Jabba and Twato.
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #217048 ] |
Mi, 08 Februar 2006 18:16 |
|
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
"So say we all!"
"Snake" <fluidstates_NO+SPAM [at] REMOVE-ME.verizon.IHATESPAM.SPAM_VAC.com> wrote
in message news:DPnGf.159$Ob.112 [at] trndny05...
>
> "Jennifer Blaustein" <J.Blaustein [at] rockaway.net> wrote in message
> news:tGnGf.11$jz1.3 [at] fe12.lga...
> >
> > "Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
> > news:PxPFf.25677$VV4.205473 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> >> I think maybe we've got enough aliens. Sure, they can bring in the odd
> >> new species, but they should work with some of the species they've come
> >> up with. I never liked seeing a new alien species every week on
Voyager.
> >
> > Beats the hell out of the TNG's tendancy to have them stumble on a
random
> > planet inhabited by humans! I always wondered if they were hinting at
> > intelligent design there, for it would seem otherwise impossible for the
> > same creature to arise and evolve at the same time on a remote planet
with
> > different conditions than earth. Actually, how likely would it be for
> > every creature to have evolved with cephalization, bipodism, etc? Every
> > startrek alien (with a couple exceptions) are simian in body structure.
> > Coincidence?
>
> I guess you missed the episode explaining "The Preservers".
And the TOS ep "The Paradise Syndrome" where Spock mentions the theory of
humans being seeded on many planets by a advanced race.
http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/library/episodes/TOS/d etail/68776.html
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
"So say we all!"
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #217049 ] |
Mi, 08 Februar 2006 18:30 |
|
"Snake" <fluidstates_NO+SPAM [at] REMOVE-ME.verizon.IHATESPAM.SPAM_VAC.com> wrote
in message news:DPnGf.159$Ob.112 [at] trndny05...
>
> "Jennifer Blaustein" <J.Blaustein [at] rockaway.net> wrote in message
> news:tGnGf.11$jz1.3 [at] fe12.lga...
> >
> > "Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
> > news:PxPFf.25677$VV4.205473 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> >> I think maybe we've got enough aliens. Sure, they can bring in the odd
> >> new species, but they should work with some of the species they've come
> >> up with. I never liked seeing a new alien species every week on
Voyager.
> >
> > Beats the hell out of the TNG's tendancy to have them stumble on a
random
> > planet inhabited by humans! I always wondered if they were hinting at
> > intelligent design there, for it would seem otherwise impossible for the
> > same creature to arise and evolve at the same time on a remote planet
with
> > different conditions than earth. Actually, how likely would it be for
> > every creature to have evolved with cephalization, bipodism, etc? Every
> > startrek alien (with a couple exceptions) are simian in body structure.
> > Coincidence?
>
> I guess you missed the episode explaining "The Preservers".
>
> ...a nice excuse for easy-to-make Foreheads du Jour! ^_^
>
> > I always thought starwars was more realistic in this regard, with
> > creatures like Jabba and Twato.
And the TOS ep "The Paradise Syndrome" where Spock mentions the theory of
humans being seeded on many planets by a advanced race.
http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/library/episodes/TOS/d etail/68776.html
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
"So say we all!"
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #217050 ] |
Mi, 08 Februar 2006 23:40 |
|
Here's an interesting idea: a movie based on that Klingon version of Hamlet
that came out a while back. An interesting idea, which is why it's certain
that Berman will NEVER think about it.
"Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:TcPFf.350978$tl.208132 [at] pd7tw3no...
> "Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
> news:AFMFf.25570$VV4.203118 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> > > personally i think a star trek klingon movie would be kinda cool, but
> > > considering it would only attract hardcore trek fans and maybe a small
> > > subset of the goth subculture i dont really see it happening ( not
that
> you
> > > were trying to suggest it would mind you).
> >
> > Any Klingon Trek movie would also have human characters, as well
> > as Vulcans and other species. I had a thought -- a movie in which
> > the Federation captain is Klingon. Maybe Worf.
>
> Like I've said before a Klingon movie (at least a PG 13) set either just
> after the Kitomer Accord where Captain Sulu could make a cameo, or (my
> favourite) right after DS9 following Martok (and Worf) back to Qonos.
>
> --
>
> Qapla'
> Kweeg
> Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
> http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
> "Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
> "So say we all!"
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: New Trek Movie Rumors [message #217087 ] |
Sa, 11 Februar 2006 22:54 |
|
"Jennifer Blaustein" <J.Blaustein [at] rockaway.net> wrote in message
news:tGnGf.11$jz1.3 [at] fe12.lga...
>
> "Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
> news:PxPFf.25677$VV4.205473 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> >>>>personally i think a star trek klingon movie would be kinda cool, but
> >>>>>> considering it would only attract hardcore trek fans and maybe a
> >>>>>> small subset of the goth subculture i dont really see it happening
> >>>>>> ( not that you were trying to suggest it would mind you).
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Any Klingon Trek movie would also have human characters, as well as
> >>>> Vulcans and other species. I had a thought -- a movie in which the
> >>>> Federation captain is Klingon. Maybe Worf.
> >>
> >>
> >> How about less Foreheads du jur and more *real* aliens? What about all
> >> the fantastic aliens we saw in TAS plus some of the aliens seen in the
> >> Federation Council in ST:TVH?
> >
> > I think maybe we've got enough aliens. Sure, they can bring in the odd
new
> > species, but they should work with some of the species they've come up
> > with. I never liked seeing a new alien species every week on Voyager.
>
> Beats the hell out of the TNG's tendancy to have them stumble on a random
> planet inhabited by humans! I always wondered if they were hinting at
> intelligent design there, for it would seem otherwise impossible for the
> same creature to arise and evolve at the same time on a remote planet with
> different conditions than earth. Actually, how likely would it be for
every
> creature to have evolved with cephalization, bipodism, etc? Every startrek
> alien (with a couple exceptions) are simian in body structure.
Coincidence?
> I always thought starwars was more realistic in this regard, with
creatures
> like Jabba and Twato.
>
>
Star Wars had a bigger budget- and TOS did have the Horta, Gorn, Excalbians,
the Kelvans (disguised in human form but off-screen immense and tentacled),
the Salt Vampire...
Ian
|
|
|
