|
|
Science Fiction » alt.startrek » ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses
| ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #195302] |
Mo, 09 Januar 2006 00:23 |
|
On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 20:57:01 -0500, ToolPackinMama
<laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
>Keeper of the Purple Twilight wrote:
>
>> And Kirk did order Spock to do it. He said "Spock?" and gestured toward
>> Valeris.
>
>If I can find even one example of Kirk saying "Spock" and gesturing with
>his head that didn't lead to a mind-rape, your little assertion is
>popped like a bubble.
>
>Do I really need to take the trouble to find such an example? I
>wouldn't mind. Shouldn't be hard.
Take off your Kirk-colored glasses.
I'm not saying that torture is a bad thing if it saves lives. Just
don't deny that it happened because you look like a dreamy fool.
Kirk clearly asked Spock to mind fuck her. What do you think had in
mind when he called out Spock's name and then Spock mind melded with
her? Spock's a Vulcan, she won't talk. Did Kirk expect Spock to
defeat her with logic like you have just been? HA.
Since Kirk was THERE and SAW what Spock did, had he thought it was a
moral problem, you would agree that Kirk would have immediately
STOPPED IT. Kirk has never been a houseplant if he disagreed.
Since Kirk did not stop it, and interacted during the process, logic
naturally leads us to conclude that Kirk sanctioned it. Otherwise,
him being such a great guy, he would have stopped it. Eh?
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #195329 ] |
Mo, 09 Januar 2006 15:17 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #199488 ] |
Di, 10 Januar 2006 02:21 |
|
|
No. :)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #199489 ] |
Di, 10 Januar 2006 02:25 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #199490 ] |
Di, 10 Januar 2006 02:43 |
|
On Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:21:28 -0500, ToolPackinMama
<laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
>No. :)
Gotta say . . . I love the double-entendre.
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #199492 ] |
Di, 10 Januar 2006 04:48 |
|
"Keeper of the Purple Twilight" <no [at] spam.invalid> wrote in message
news:090120061925093183%no [at] spam.invalid...
> In article <dbKdndltYL6dkV7eRVn-hw [at] comcast.com>, ToolPackinMama
> <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
>
> > No. :)
>
> Here, put on these trout-colored glasses. You'll feel much better.
>
> And that's no fish story either.
I'd like to think those would help, but sadly they won't. As Laura just
admitted, fact and logic do not apply to her vision of debating Star Trek
(or anything else) She believes she is always right, and everyone else is
wrong and just "out to get her."
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #199493 ] |
Di, 10 Januar 2006 05:02 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #199495 ] |
Di, 10 Januar 2006 05:48 |
|
Kweeg wrote:
> She believes she is always right, and everyone else is
> wrong
And how is that different from anyone else?
--
OSI
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #199496 ] |
Di, 10 Januar 2006 06:57 |
|
OSI wrote:
> Kweeg wrote:
>
>> She believes she is always right, and everyone else is
>> wrong
>
>
> And how is that different from anyone else?
Seriously! :)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #199497 ] |
Di, 10 Januar 2006 07:04 |
|
"Laura, stop acting like you think you are serious about Star Trek.
Just cos you have strong Trek-related opinions and willingly stand by
them in the face of opposition, and to back them up with canon evidence
and/or passionate eloquence doesn't mean you know shit."
:)
Come on, people, this is a fan forum. Do you really mean to criticize
and condemn Trekkies (like me) who have the audacity to act like fans,
right here in front of ~everybody~?
:)
I'm a Star Trek fan. I have definite opinions. I'm not too shy to
explain why.
I like me. You should like me, too.
:)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #199501 ] |
Di, 10 Januar 2006 07:19 |
|
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:48:08 GMT, OSI <abuse [at] msn.com> wrote:
>Kweeg wrote:
>
>> She believes she is always right, and everyone else is
>> wrong
>
>And how is that different from anyone else?
When confronted with overwhelming evidence, most people will concede,
rather than look like a jackass.
-LMB
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #199503 ] |
Di, 10 Januar 2006 07:35 |
|
Louis M. Brown wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:48:08 GMT, OSI <abuse [at] msn.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Kweeg wrote:
>>
>>
>>>She believes she is always right, and everyone else is
>>>wrong
>>
>>And how is that different from anyone else?
>
>
>
> When confronted with overwhelming evidence, most people will concede,
> rather than look like a jackass.
I used to fight with people. Now, I don't fight. Say what you like,
I'm not going to fight.
I would like for everybody everywhere to like what I say, and how I say
it. That's my wish. But I'm OK if there are people who don't like what
I say or how I say it. Let's face it: you can't please 'em all.
If people let nay-sayers and killjoys stop them, we'd have no progress
at all.
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #199507 ] |
Di, 10 Januar 2006 08:39 |
|
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:19:12 GMT, Louis M. Brown
<phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote:
>On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:48:08 GMT, OSI <abuse [at] msn.com> wrote:
>
>>Kweeg wrote:
>>
>>> She believes she is always right, and everyone else is
>>> wrong
>>
>>And how is that different from anyone else?
>
>
>When confronted with overwhelming evidence, most people will concede,
>rather than look like a jackass.
>
>-LMB
One thing is glaringly obvious:
You certainly stand outside of the "most people" group, lol.
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #199508 ] |
Di, 10 Januar 2006 09:13 |
|
"Louis M. Brown" <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:eok6s1dv0034082cuei9bk46srf99k5s5s [at] 4ax.com...
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:48:08 GMT, OSI <abuse [at] msn.com> wrote:
>
> >Kweeg wrote:
> >
> >> She believes she is always right, and everyone else is
> >> wrong
> >
> >And how is that different from anyone else?
>
>
> When confronted with overwhelming evidence, most people will concede,
> rather than look like a jackass.
Exactly.
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #199509 ] |
Di, 10 Januar 2006 09:35 |
|
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:13:07 GMT, "Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca>
wrote:
>"Louis M. Brown" <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote in message
>news:eok6s1dv0034082cuei9bk46srf99k5s5s [at] 4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:48:08 GMT, OSI <abuse [at] msn.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Kweeg wrote:
>> >
>> >> She believes she is always right, and everyone else is
>> >> wrong
>> >
>> >And how is that different from anyone else?
>>
>>
>> When confronted with overwhelming evidence, most people will concede,
>> rather than look like a jackass.
>
>Exactly.
Is this going to be a new leaf for you as well?
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #199510 ] |
Di, 10 Januar 2006 10:13 |
|
MrSpook wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:19:12 GMT, Louis M. Brown
> <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:48:08 GMT, OSI <abuse [at] msn.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Kweeg wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>She believes she is always right, and everyone else is
>>>>wrong
>>>
>>>And how is that different from anyone else?
>>
>>
>>When confronted with overwhelming evidence, most people will concede,
>>rather than look like a jackass.
>>
>>-LMB
>
>
>
> One thing is glaringly obvious:
>
>
> You certainly stand outside of the "most people" group, lol.
Seriously, IMHO, most people do. In my experience, it's a rare NG
person who concedes anything in the average usenet debate. I'm as
likely as anyone, and IMHO more likely than most, to apologize, to
adjust my opinion, or to concede a "debate" point.
It's not like usenet "debates" actually have rules, or anything.
I have gotten into the habit of simply stating my opinion and my reasons
for my opinion. I generally don't argue/fight anymore. What's the use?
Most of the people who regularly post here already have their minds
made up.
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #199514 ] |
Di, 10 Januar 2006 19:01 |
|
> I used to fight with people. Now, I don't fight. Say what you like, I'm not going to fight.
>
> I would like for everybody everywhere to like what I say, and how I say it. That's my wish. But I'm OK if there are people who don't like what I say or how I say it. Let's face it: you can't please 'em all.
Good policy. I try to follow it myself.
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #202258 ] |
So, 15 Januar 2006 12:42 |
|
ToolPackinMama (laura [at] lauragoodwin.org) wrote:
: "Laura, stop acting like you think you are serious about Star Trek.
: Just cos you have strong Trek-related opinions and willingly stand by
: them in the face of opposition, and to back them up with canon evidence
: and/or passionate eloquence doesn't mean you know shit."
: :)
: Come on, people, this is a fan forum. Do you really mean to criticize
: and condemn Trekkies (like me) who have the audacity to act like fans,
: right here in front of ~everybody~?
: :)
: I'm a Star Trek fan. I have definite opinions. I'm not too shy to
: explain why.
: I like me. You should like me, too.
She's very likeable!
Brad
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #202259 ] |
So, 15 Januar 2006 12:43 |
|
Louis M. Brown (phyphor [at] rocketmail.com) wrote:
: On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:48:08 GMT, OSI <abuse [at] msn.com> wrote:
: >Kweeg wrote:
: >
: >> She believes she is always right, and everyone else is
: >> wrong
: >
: >And how is that different from anyone else?
: When confronted with overwhelming evidence, most people will concede,
: rather than look like a jackass.
Perhaps she will, when she's finally confronted by overwhelming evidence.
Brad
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #202276 ] |
So, 15 Januar 2006 23:28 |
|
"Brad Filippone" <al019 [at] chebucto.ns.ca> wrote in message
news:dqdce7$rvk$12 [at] News.Dal.Ca...
> ToolPackinMama (laura [at] lauragoodwin.org) wrote:
> : "Laura, stop acting like you think you are serious about Star Trek.
> : Just cos you have strong Trek-related opinions and willingly stand by
> : them in the face of opposition, and to back them up with canon evidence
> : and/or passionate eloquence doesn't mean you know shit."
>
> : :)
>
> : Come on, people, this is a fan forum. Do you really mean to criticize
> : and condemn Trekkies (like me) who have the audacity to act like fans,
> : right here in front of ~everybody~?
>
> : :)
>
> : I'm a Star Trek fan. I have definite opinions. I'm not too shy to
> : explain why.
>
> : I like me. You should like me, too.
>
> She's very likeable!
Until you have a different opinion than her.
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #202287 ] |
Mo, 16 Januar 2006 04:22 |
|
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:43:05 +0000 (UTC), al019 [at] chebucto.ns.ca (Brad
Filippone) wrote:
>Louis M. Brown (phyphor [at] rocketmail.com) wrote:
>: On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:48:08 GMT, OSI <abuse [at] msn.com> wrote:
>
>: >Kweeg wrote:
>: >
>: >> She believes she is always right, and everyone else is
>: >> wrong
>: >
>: >And how is that different from anyone else?
>
>
>: When confronted with overwhelming evidence, most people will concede,
>: rather than look like a jackass.
>
>Perhaps she will, when she's finally confronted by overwhelming evidence.
>
>Brad
What's shown on screen isn't considered overwhelming? 'Coz, what's
shown is canon.
-LMB
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #202293 ] |
Mo, 16 Januar 2006 05:58 |
|
"Louis M. Brown" <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:ao3ms1phsbdn25vpg48d08bsvqbo8e5ne9 [at] 4ax.com...
> On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:43:05 +0000 (UTC), al019 [at] chebucto.ns.ca (Brad
> Filippone) wrote:
>
> >Louis M. Brown (phyphor [at] rocketmail.com) wrote:
> >: On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:48:08 GMT, OSI <abuse [at] msn.com> wrote:
> >
> >: >Kweeg wrote:
> >: >
> >: >> She believes she is always right, and everyone else is
> >: >> wrong
> >: >
> >: >And how is that different from anyone else?
> >
> >
> >: When confronted with overwhelming evidence, most people will concede,
> >: rather than look like a jackass.
> >
> >Perhaps she will, when she's finally confronted by overwhelming evidence.
> >
> >Brad
>
> What's shown on screen isn't considered overwhelming? 'Coz, what's
> shown is canon.
> -LMB
Indeed.
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #212938 ] |
Mi, 01 Februar 2006 10:01 |
|
Kweeg (kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca) wrote:
: "Brad Filippone" <al019 [at] chebucto.ns.ca> wrote in message
: news:dqdce7$rvk$12 [at] News.Dal.Ca...
: > ToolPackinMama (laura [at] lauragoodwin.org) wrote:
: > : "Laura, stop acting like you think you are serious about Star Trek.
: > : Just cos you have strong Trek-related opinions and willingly stand by
: > : them in the face of opposition, and to back them up with canon evidence
: > : and/or passionate eloquence doesn't mean you know shit."
: >
: > : :)
: >
: > : Come on, people, this is a fan forum. Do you really mean to criticize
: > : and condemn Trekkies (like me) who have the audacity to act like fans,
: > : right here in front of ~everybody~?
: >
: > : :)
: >
: > : I'm a Star Trek fan. I have definite opinions. I'm not too shy to
: > : explain why.
: >
: > : I like me. You should like me, too.
: >
: > She's very likeable!
: Until you have a different opinion than her.
Not true. I actually disagree with her about the K/S thing and she knows
that. But we are friends and I support her right to her opinion, which is
why I usually defend her (mostly on the TOS group).
Brad
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #212939 ] |
Mi, 01 Februar 2006 10:02 |
|
Louis M. Brown (phyphor [at] rocketmail.com) wrote:
: On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:43:05 +0000 (UTC), al019 [at] chebucto.ns.ca (Brad
: Filippone) wrote:
: >Louis M. Brown (phyphor [at] rocketmail.com) wrote:
: >: On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:48:08 GMT, OSI <abuse [at] msn.com> wrote:
: >
: >: >Kweeg wrote:
: >: >
: >: >> She believes she is always right, and everyone else is
: >: >> wrong
: >: >
: >: >And how is that different from anyone else?
: >
: >
: >: When confronted with overwhelming evidence, most people will concede,
: >: rather than look like a jackass.
: >
: >Perhaps she will, when she's finally confronted by overwhelming evidence.
: >
: >Brad
: What's shown on screen isn't considered overwhelming? 'Coz, what's
: shown is canon.
I agree. And there's enough onscreen to support her theory. Ever read
her articles?
Brad
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #212942 ] |
Mi, 01 Februar 2006 13:05 |
|
Absolutely. Episode after episode where K and S can't keep their hands
off each other. Episode after episode where they openly flirt. And even
in 1967 I noticed that in City On The Edge Of Forever they had two twin
beds, one of which was covered in Spock's tube and wire mnemonic memory
circuit--and the look of jealous pain on Spock's face when Kirk flirts
with Edith on the stairs.
Lots and lots of *canon* moments.
Starshadow www.starshadow.net (who thinks Kweeg thinks IDIC is some
sort of meaningless chant or something)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #212945 ] |
Mi, 01 Februar 2006 16:04 |
|
"Starshadow" <starshadow [at] starshadow.net> wrote in message
news:1138795544.835698.263750 [at] z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
> Absolutely. Episode after episode where K and S can't keep their hands
> off each other. Episode after episode where they openly flirt. And even
> in 1967 I noticed that in City On The Edge Of Forever they had two twin
> beds, one of which was covered in Spock's tube and wire mnemonic memory
> circuit--and the look of jealous pain on Spock's face when Kirk flirts
> with Edith on the stairs.
>
actually i took that last one to mean that even with his superior vulcan
metabolism, even he couldnt digest soup kitchen food comfortably.
cheers
fozzi
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Trout-colored glasses [message #212946 ] |
Mi, 01 Februar 2006 17:00 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #212949 ] |
Mi, 01 Februar 2006 19:26 |
|
Brad Filippone wrote:
> Kweeg (kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca) wrote:
> : "Brad Filippone" <al019 [at] chebucto.ns.ca> wrote
> : > She's very likeable!
>
> : Until you have a different opinion than her.
>
> Not true. I actually disagree with her about the K/S thing and she knows
> that. But we are friends and I support her right to her opinion, which is
> why I usually defend her (mostly on the TOS group).
Thank you, Brad.
Kweeg, stop lying. It only reflects badly on you.
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #212952 ] |
Mi, 01 Februar 2006 19:33 |
|
Brad Filippone wrote:
> Louis M. Brown (phyphor [at] rocketmail.com) wrote:
> : What's shown on screen isn't considered overwhelming? 'Coz, what's
> : shown is canon.
>
> I agree. And there's enough onscreen to support her theory. Ever read
> her articles?
Thank you. :)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #212953 ] |
Mi, 01 Februar 2006 19:34 |
|
Starshadow wrote:
> Absolutely. Episode after episode where K and S can't keep their hands
> off each other. Episode after episode where they openly flirt. And even
> in 1967 I noticed that in City On The Edge Of Forever they had two twin
> beds, one of which was covered in Spock's tube and wire mnemonic memory
> circuit--and the look of jealous pain on Spock's face when Kirk flirts
> with Edith on the stairs.
>
> Lots and lots of *canon* moments.
S'Right!
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #212964 ] |
Do, 02 Februar 2006 02:36 |
|
"Brad Filippone" <al019 [at] chebucto.ns.ca> wrote in message
news:drptcj$ba1$4 [at] News.Dal.Ca...
> Kweeg (kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca) wrote:
> : "Brad Filippone" <al019 [at] chebucto.ns.ca> wrote in message
> : news:dqdce7$rvk$12 [at] News.Dal.Ca...
> : > ToolPackinMama (laura [at] lauragoodwin.org) wrote:
> : > : "Laura, stop acting like you think you are serious about Star Trek.
> : > : Just cos you have strong Trek-related opinions and willingly stand
by
> : > : them in the face of opposition, and to back them up with canon
evidence
> : > : and/or passionate eloquence doesn't mean you know shit."
> : >
> : > : :)
> : >
> : > : Come on, people, this is a fan forum. Do you really mean to
criticize
> : > : and condemn Trekkies (like me) who have the audacity to act like
fans,
> : > : right here in front of ~everybody~?
> : >
> : > : :)
> : >
> : > : I'm a Star Trek fan. I have definite opinions. I'm not too shy to
> : > : explain why.
> : >
> : > : I like me. You should like me, too.
> : >
> : > She's very likeable!
>
> : Until you have a different opinion than her.
>
> Not true. I actually disagree with her about the K/S thing and she knows
> that. But we are friends and I support her right to her opinion, which is
> why I usually defend her (mostly on the TOS group).
Well maybe in your case, not mine. I used to get along with her and had many
pleasant exchanges. I don't agree with her theories, they're fun and
entertaining but when she adamantly defends her position as being the ONLY
correct one based on HER selective interpretation of "the facts" to the
exclusion of all others, it becomes rather tiresome. She started with the
name calling and derogatory comments and has never apologized for her
actions. She says she want to debate but really she just wants to be the
centre of attention and act like a 6 year old prima donna, she will even
argue dictionary definitions and meanings of words.
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Trout-colored glasses [message #212965 ] |
Do, 02 Februar 2006 02:36 |
|
"Keeper of the Purple Twilight" <no [at] spam.invalid> wrote in message
news:010220061000026432%no [at] spam.invalid...
> In article <q64Ef.233106$V7.122122 [at] news-server.bigpond.net.au>, Fozzi
> <efor6920 [at] bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
> > > Absolutely. Episode after episode where K and S can't keep their hands
> > > off each other. Episode after episode where they openly flirt. And
even
> > > in 1967 I noticed that in City On The Edge Of Forever they had two
twin
> > > beds, one of which was covered in Spock's tube and wire mnemonic
memory
> > > circuit--and the look of jealous pain on Spock's face when Kirk flirts
> > > with Edith on the stairs.
> > >
> >
> > actually i took that last one to mean that even with his superior vulcan
> > metabolism, even he couldnt digest soup kitchen food comfortably.
>
> He couldn't eat it since it didn't have enough fish. Definitely.
LOL!
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #212968 ] |
Do, 02 Februar 2006 03:04 |
|
Kweeg wrote:
> She started with the
> name calling and derogatory comments and has never apologized
Nonsense. That's completely untrue. All of it is untrue.
Yes, I have definite views and I advocate in favor of my own views.
Nobody (not even you) ever apologized to me for the harsh things they
said and did to me in usenet, and I don't expect them to.
Why let such things eat at you? Get over it.
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #212976 ] |
Do, 02 Februar 2006 09:30 |
|
On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 21:04:42 -0500, ToolPackinMama
<laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
>Kweeg wrote:
>
>> She started with the
>> name calling and derogatory comments and has never apologized
>
>Nonsense. That's completely untrue. All of it is untrue.
>
>Yes, I have definite views and I advocate in favor of my own views.
>Nobody (not even you) ever apologized to me for the harsh things they
>said and did to me in usenet, and I don't expect them to.
>
>Why let such things eat at you? Get over it.
If ya can't get over it, it *must* be love.
That's how I know she loves *me*, lol.
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #212977 ] |
Do, 02 Februar 2006 12:36 |
|
"SrEspectro" <nunca [at] hogar.mundo> wrote in message
news:bkg3u1d9evcnnq58dtjqgfrchu9c1rgcrg [at] 4ax.com...
> On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 21:04:42 -0500, ToolPackinMama
> <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
>
> >Kweeg wrote:
> >
> >> She started with the
> >> name calling and derogatory comments and has never apologized
> >
> >Nonsense. That's completely untrue. All of it is untrue.
> >
> >Yes, I have definite views and I advocate in favor of my own views.
> >Nobody (not even you) ever apologized to me for the harsh things they
> >said and did to me in usenet, and I don't expect them to.
> >
> >Why let such things eat at you? Get over it.
Not eating me Laura, just explaining to your minions why I don't wanna
interact with you.
> If ya can't get over it, it *must* be love.
>
> That's how I know she loves *me*, lol.
Sucker.
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
So say we all!
>
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #212980 ] |
Do, 02 Februar 2006 14:32 |
|
On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:36:27 GMT, "Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca>
wrote:
>"SrEspectro" <nunca [at] hogar.mundo> wrote in message
>news:bkg3u1d9evcnnq58dtjqgfrchu9c1rgcrg [at] 4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 21:04:42 -0500, ToolPackinMama
>> <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
>>
>> >Kweeg wrote:
>> >
>> >> She started with the
>> >> name calling and derogatory comments and has never apologized
>> >
>> >Nonsense. That's completely untrue. All of it is untrue.
>> >
>> >Yes, I have definite views and I advocate in favor of my own views.
>> >Nobody (not even you) ever apologized to me for the harsh things they
>> >said and did to me in usenet, and I don't expect them to.
>> >
>> >Why let such things eat at you? Get over it.
>
>Not eating me Laura, just explaining to your minions why I don't wanna
>interact with you.
>
>
>> If ya can't get over it, it *must* be love.
>>
>> That's how I know she loves *me*, lol.
>
>Sucker.
I think a more applicable term would be, "Motherfucker". :)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #212984 ] |
Do, 02 Februar 2006 19:50 |
|
Kweeg wrote:
>>>Why let such things eat at you? Get over it.
>
>
> Not eating me Laura
LOL baloney. :)
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #212985 ] |
Do, 02 Februar 2006 19:52 |
|
SrEspectro wrote:
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:36:27 GMT, "Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca>
> wrote:
>>Sucker.
>
>
>
> I think a more applicable term would be, "Motherfucker". :)
Try "Mamajama". Has a nice ring to it.
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #212993 ] |
Do, 02 Februar 2006 23:45 |
|
"SrEspectro" <nunca [at] hogar.mundo> wrote in message
news:2924u15n3les89rctier9vuiu0blt5o863 [at] 4ax.com...
> On Thu, 02 Feb 2006 11:36:27 GMT, "Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca>
> wrote:
>
> >"SrEspectro" <nunca [at] hogar.mundo> wrote in message
> >news:bkg3u1d9evcnnq58dtjqgfrchu9c1rgcrg [at] 4ax.com...
> >> On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 21:04:42 -0500, ToolPackinMama
> >> <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Kweeg wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> She started with the
> >> >> name calling and derogatory comments and has never apologized
> >> >
> >> >Nonsense. That's completely untrue. All of it is untrue.
> >> >
> >> >Yes, I have definite views and I advocate in favor of my own views.
> >> >Nobody (not even you) ever apologized to me for the harsh things they
> >> >said and did to me in usenet, and I don't expect them to.
> >> >
> >> >Why let such things eat at you? Get over it.
> >
> >Not eating me Laura, just explaining to your minions why I don't wanna
> >interact with you.
> >
> >
> >> If ya can't get over it, it *must* be love.
> >>
> >> That's how I know she loves *me*, lol.
> >
> >Sucker.
>
>
> I think a more applicable term would be, "Motherfucker". :)
No.
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
So say we all!
|
|
|
| Re: ToolPackinMama, take off your Kirk-colored glasses [message #213012 ] |
Fr, 03 Februar 2006 03:32 |
|
~So what~ if Kweeg is pissed that I allegedly insulted him, and that I
allegedly failed to apologize to him for this heinous usenet act?
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Do Feb 9 05:42:37 CET 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,12535 Sekunden |
