| Future Guy Identity [message #179997] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 07:12 |
|
Did we ever find out who the future guy was
on Enterprise? I missed most of the 4th season.
I'm catching back up and am just starting the
3rd.
|
|
|
| Re: Future Guy Identity [message #179998 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 07:37 |
|
> Did we ever find out who the future guy was
> on Enterprise? I missed most of the 4th season.
> I'm catching back up and am just starting the
> 3rd.
No, that's an incredibly important bit of information that was a
mystery for multiple episodes, that the producers neglected to
bother to reveal to us.
|
|
|
| Re: Future Guy Identity [message #180001 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 08:52 |
|
"Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
news:pIumf.137089$Ph4.4180166 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> > Did we ever find out who the future guy was
> > on Enterprise? I missed most of the 4th season.
> > I'm catching back up and am just starting the
> > 3rd.
>
> No, that's an incredibly important bit of information that was a
> mystery for multiple episodes, that the producers neglected to
> bother to reveal to us.
....like we would have cared?
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: Future Guy Identity [message #180004 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 16:58 |
|
>>>Did we ever find out who the future guy was
>>>> > on Enterprise? I missed most of the 4th season.
>>>> > I'm catching back up and am just starting the
>>>> > 3rd.
>>
>>>
>>> No, that's an incredibly important bit of information that was a
>>> mystery for multiple episodes, that the producers neglected to
>>> bother to reveal to us.
>
>
> ...like we would have cared?
I would have cared in the beginning. the time meddling arc was
interesting, then. But after the third year, I didn't care that
much. I didn't want one episode more about time travel.
|
|
|
| Re: Future Guy Identity [message #180007 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 21:53 |
|
"Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
news:vWCmf.137203$Ph4.4183132 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>>>>Did we ever find out who the future guy was
>>>>> > on Enterprise? I missed most of the 4th season.
>>>>> > I'm catching back up and am just starting the
>>>>> > 3rd.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> No, that's an incredibly important bit of information that was a
>>>> mystery for multiple episodes, that the producers neglected to
>>>> bother to reveal to us.
>>
>>
>> ...like we would have cared?
>
> I would have cared in the beginning. the time meddling arc was
> interesting, then. But after the third year, I didn't care that much. I
> didn't want one episode more about time travel.
Well, with that many episodes with him in it they
really should have fit it in somehow. Too bad.
|
|
|
| Re: Future Guy Identity [message #180012 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 23:47 |
|
"Numan" <tbrdmann [at] sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:lfHmf.38345$D13.13665 [at] newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
>
> "Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
> news:vWCmf.137203$Ph4.4183132 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> >>>>Did we ever find out who the future guy was
> >>>>> > on Enterprise? I missed most of the 4th season.
> >>>>> > I'm catching back up and am just starting the
> >>>>> > 3rd.
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> No, that's an incredibly important bit of information that was a
> >>>> mystery for multiple episodes, that the producers neglected to
> >>>> bother to reveal to us.
> >>
> >>
> >> ...like we would have cared?
> >
> > I would have cared in the beginning. the time meddling arc was
> > interesting, then. But after the third year, I didn't care that much. I
> > didn't want one episode more about time travel.
>
> Well, with that many episodes with him in it they
> really should have fit it in somehow. Too bad.
>
>
I don't think they understand the concept of a story arc- like, you work it
out beforehand and reveal it episode by episode. As such, they probably
never knew or cared who he was. It was probably just "we'll put this guy in
it, and maybe we'll think up a good explanation of who he is, or one of the
staff writers will, or something". So it wasn't so much forgotten, as never
thought in the first place.
Ian
--
www.jaxtrawstudios.com
science fiction with shagging in it
|
|
|
| Re: Future Guy Identity [message #180014 ] |
So, 11 Dezember 2005 01:57 |
|
"I am your father, Luke," said Future Guy. "Look into your heart, you
know it to be true."
"NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!!!" screamed Crewman Daniels.
|
|
|
| Re: Future Guy Identity [message #180019 ] |
So, 11 Dezember 2005 06:49 |
|
"Jaxtraw" <jax [at] knickersjaxtrawstudios.com> wrote in message
news:439b59f0$0$29577$da0feed9 [at] news.zen.co.uk...
>
> I don't think they understand the concept of a story arc- like, you work
it
> out beforehand and reveal it episode by episode. As such, they probably
> never knew or cared who he was. It was probably just "we'll put this guy
in
> it, and maybe we'll think up a good explanation of who he is, or one of
the
> staff writers will, or something". So it wasn't so much forgotten, as
never
> thought in the first place.
>
Damn Ian, you're right on the mark:
http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Future_Guy
"Rick Berman has stated in interviews that at no time was the identity of
"Future Guy" ever developed, nor a backstory created for the character. The
series never revealed the identity of the Suliban benefactor. "
|
|
|
| Re: Future Guy Identity [message #180042 ] |
Mo, 12 Dezember 2005 05:42 |
|
--
Numan
"Bo Raxo" <invasions_r_us [at] thepentagon.removethis.com> wrote in message
news:z5Pmf.2092$QQ1.66 [at] newsread3.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>
> "Jaxtraw" <jax [at] knickersjaxtrawstudios.com> wrote in message
> news:439b59f0$0$29577$da0feed9 [at] news.zen.co.uk...
>>
>> I don't think they understand the concept of a story arc- like, you work
> it
>> out beforehand and reveal it episode by episode. As such, they probably
>> never knew or cared who he was. It was probably just "we'll put this guy
> in
>> it, and maybe we'll think up a good explanation of who he is, or one of
> the
>> staff writers will, or something". So it wasn't so much forgotten, as
> never
>> thought in the first place.
>>
>
> Damn Ian, you're right on the mark:
>
> http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/Future_Guy
>
> "Rick Berman has stated in interviews that at no time was the identity of
> "Future Guy" ever developed, nor a backstory created for the character.
> The
> series never revealed the identity of the Suliban benefactor. "
Thanks for the link.
That is such crap that the guy is in that many episodes and
we never get to find out who he was! Damn it.
|
|
|
| Re: Future Guy Identity [message #180172 ] |
Fr, 16 Dezember 2005 18:38 |
|
A rumor was that it was going to be Archer from the future doing this
for some reason.
Also when I first saw the guy - I thought it might be that Vulcan guy
that was always trying to get the Enterprise project shut down. (Gary
Graham is the actor - i forget his character name)
|
|
|
