|
Sprinkler Systems
Uhaul move
Lawn care
Roses and trees
Ford Parts
Chrysler Parts
Lake Powell
New IPod Touch Apps
New IPhone Apps
IPhone Apps
IPad Information
IPad Apps
Android APPS
Android Games APPS
Android Systems
Android Tablets APPS and Beyond
Smartphone Apps
Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools
Tablet PC
Car Sharing Car Leasing
Tabler Pc
Fly Fishing
Toyota Cars
Vacation Rentals
Stock market
NYSE
SSE Stock
Freight & Shipping News
Gluten
Lactose
Gout
My Coupon Life
Campgrounds Check
Outdoor
Kitchen Design and Redoo
Bath Remodeling
Palm Springs
Las Vegas Vacation Tipps
Lake Powell Boating
Homes for lease
Electric and green Car Blog
Pearls and diamonds
Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App
Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
|
Science Fiction » alt.fan.starwars » Why the Death Star took so long to biuld.
| Why the Death Star took so long to biuld. [message #162342] |
Mo, 07 November 2005 08:25 |
|
In the DVD commentary, GL mentions how putting the death star in ROTS
was a bit of a stretch. He then (almost jokingly) dismissed it, by
saying they had union problems, supply problems, and design problems.
Hey, GL said it. It's canon. :-)
--
usenetsolon [at] gmail.com
|
|
|
| Re: Why the Death Star took so long to biuld. [message #163637 ] |
Mo, 07 November 2005 21:47 |
|
"Solon" <usenetsolon [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
news:2ZudndwgDb8-nPLenZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d [at] giganews.com...
> In the DVD commentary, GL mentions how putting the death star in ROTS was
> a bit of a stretch. He then (almost jokingly) dismissed it, by saying they
> had union problems, supply problems, and design problems.
It's called shoe-horning. The same way Chewbacca managed to get into the
prequels.
|
|
|
| Re: Why the Death Star took so long to biuld. [message #163695 ] |
Mi, 09 November 2005 01:10 |
|
"Scarfman" <Donotemail [at] pipex.com> wrote in message
news:mM2dndwq_Z3RIPLeRVnygQ [at] pipex.net...
>
> "Solon" <usenetsolon [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:2ZudndwgDb8-nPLenZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d [at] giganews.com...
> > In the DVD commentary, GL mentions how putting the death star in ROTS
was
> > a bit of a stretch. He then (almost jokingly) dismissed it, by saying
they
> > had union problems, supply problems, and design problems.
>
> It's called shoe-horning. The same way Chewbacca managed to get into the
> prequels.
>
>
I'm glad Chewie was in the prequel, but where was Mala?
Where was freaking Art Carney or Maude (right on, Maude!), for frak's sake??
If Chewie is canon in the prequels, then by golly, Mala and Itchy and Art
Carney and Bea Arthur are canon, too!!!
|
|
|
| Re: Why the Death Star took so long to biuld. [message #163697 ] |
Mi, 09 November 2005 01:28 |
|
"Joseph S. Powell, III" <nospam [at] nospam.net> wrote in message
news:B9bcf.11515$7s1.4781 [at] fe04.lga...
>
> "Scarfman" <Donotemail [at] pipex.com> wrote in message
> news:mM2dndwq_Z3RIPLeRVnygQ [at] pipex.net...
>>
>> "Solon" <usenetsolon [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:2ZudndwgDb8-nPLenZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d [at] giganews.com...
>> > In the DVD commentary, GL mentions how putting the death star in ROTS
> was
>> > a bit of a stretch. He then (almost jokingly) dismissed it, by saying
> they
>> > had union problems, supply problems, and design problems.
>>
>> It's called shoe-horning. The same way Chewbacca managed to get into the
>> prequels.
>>
>>
>
>
> I'm glad Chewie was in the prequel, but where was Mala?
> Where was freaking Art Carney or Maude (right on, Maude!), for frak's
> sake??
> If Chewie is canon in the prequels, then by golly, Mala and Itchy and Art
> Carney and Bea Arthur are canon, too!!!
Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!
|
|
|
| Re: Why the Death Star took so long to biuld. [message #166279 ] |
So, 13 November 2005 23:20 |
|
"Anonymous" <none> wrote in message
news:_uednQ0yP5EB3-zeRVn-gg [at] comcast.com...
>
> "Joseph S. Powell, III" <nospam [at] nospam.net> wrote in message
> news:B9bcf.11515$7s1.4781 [at] fe04.lga...
> >
> > "Scarfman" <Donotemail [at] pipex.com> wrote in message
> > news:mM2dndwq_Z3RIPLeRVnygQ [at] pipex.net...
> >>
> >> "Solon" <usenetsolon [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> news:2ZudndwgDb8-nPLenZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d [at] giganews.com...
> >> > In the DVD commentary, GL mentions how putting the death star in ROTS
> > was
> >> > a bit of a stretch. He then (almost jokingly) dismissed it, by saying
> > they
> >> > had union problems, supply problems, and design problems.
> >>
> >> It's called shoe-horning. The same way Chewbacca managed to get into
the
> >> prequels.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> > I'm glad Chewie was in the prequel, but where was Mala?
> > Where was freaking Art Carney or Maude (right on, Maude!), for frak's
> > sake??
> > If Chewie is canon in the prequels, then by golly, Mala and Itchy and
Art
> > Carney and Bea Arthur are canon, too!!!
>
> Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!
>
Yeah. we should have had Obi-Wan, Padme & Anakin going down there to
celebrate Life day too.
Just think.. Bea Arthur, 20 years younger.. What a chick barmaid she would
have been. ;-)
|
|
|
| Re: Why the Death Star took so long to biuld. [message #166282 ] |
Mo, 14 November 2005 00:51 |
|
In article <f%Odf.3282$Es4.238 [at] fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk>, "Jedi Jonny"
<spamremovehumej69 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Anonymous" <none> wrote in message
> news:_uednQ0yP5EB3-zeRVn-gg [at] comcast.com...
> >
> > "Joseph S. Powell, III" <nospam [at] nospam.net> wrote in message
> > news:B9bcf.11515$7s1.4781 [at] fe04.lga...
> > >
> > > "Scarfman" <Donotemail [at] pipex.com> wrote in message
> > > news:mM2dndwq_Z3RIPLeRVnygQ [at] pipex.net...
> > >>
> > >> "Solon" <usenetsolon [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
> > >> news:2ZudndwgDb8-nPLenZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d [at] giganews.com...
> > >> > In the DVD commentary, GL mentions how putting the death star in ROTS
> > > was
> > >> > a bit of a stretch. He then (almost jokingly) dismissed it, by saying
> > > they
> > >> > had union problems, supply problems, and design problems.
> > >>
> > >> It's called shoe-horning. The same way Chewbacca managed to get into
> the
> > >> prequels.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm glad Chewie was in the prequel, but where was Mala?
> > > Where was freaking Art Carney or Maude (right on, Maude!), for frak's
> > > sake??
> > > If Chewie is canon in the prequels, then by golly, Mala and Itchy and
> Art
> > > Carney and Bea Arthur are canon, too!!!
> >
> > Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!
> >
>
> Yeah. we should have had Obi-Wan, Padme & Anakin going down there to
> celebrate Life day too.
> Just think.. Bea Arthur, 20 years younger.. What a chick barmaid she would
> have been. ;-)
You briefly saw her in Episode II - she was the human waitress in
Dexter's diner. ;-)
|
|
|
| Re: Why the Death Star took so long to biuld. [message #166295 ] |
Mo, 14 November 2005 19:03 |
|
"Anybody" <anybody [at] anywhere-anytime.com> wrote in message
news:141120051251570333%anybody [at] anywhere-anytime.com...
> In article <f%Odf.3282$Es4.238 [at] fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk>, "Jedi Jonny"
> <spamremovehumej69 [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "Anonymous" <none> wrote in message
> > news:_uednQ0yP5EB3-zeRVn-gg [at] comcast.com...
> > >
> > > "Joseph S. Powell, III" <nospam [at] nospam.net> wrote in message
> > > news:B9bcf.11515$7s1.4781 [at] fe04.lga...
> > > >
> > > > "Scarfman" <Donotemail [at] pipex.com> wrote in message
> > > > news:mM2dndwq_Z3RIPLeRVnygQ [at] pipex.net...
> > > >>
> > > >> "Solon" <usenetsolon [at] gmail.com> wrote in message
> > > >> news:2ZudndwgDb8-nPLenZ2dnUVZ_vidnZ2d [at] giganews.com...
> > > >> > In the DVD commentary, GL mentions how putting the death star in
ROTS
> > > > was
> > > >> > a bit of a stretch. He then (almost jokingly) dismissed it, by
saying
> > > > they
> > > >> > had union problems, supply problems, and design problems.
> > > >>
> > > >> It's called shoe-horning. The same way Chewbacca managed to get
into
> > the
> > > >> prequels.
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm glad Chewie was in the prequel, but where was Mala?
> > > > Where was freaking Art Carney or Maude (right on, Maude!), for
frak's
> > > > sake??
> > > > If Chewie is canon in the prequels, then by golly, Mala and Itchy
and
> > Art
> > > > Carney and Bea Arthur are canon, too!!!
> > >
> > > Nooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo!!!!!!
> > >
> >
> > Yeah. we should have had Obi-Wan, Padme & Anakin going down there to
> > celebrate Life day too.
> > Just think.. Bea Arthur, 20 years younger.. What a chick barmaid she
would
> > have been. ;-)
>
> You briefly saw her in Episode II - she was the human waitress in
> Dexter's diner. ;-)
and I missed her.... Rats. Gonna have to watch it again
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Do Mai 24 09:26:26 CEST 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,05267 Sekunden |