| The voice of the book [message #46] |
Fr, 25 März 2005 19:46 |
|
I've just bumped into Steven Fry in my local Waitrose.
Literally. Bumped into him as he strolled round the end of an aisle and
I was bumbling along without paying any attention to the world around me.
I must say, he's a lot taller than he looks on TV.
A thoroughly nice gent. He did a little freindly smile and side-stepped
me then went about his business, nodding and saying hello to people as
he went.
--
www.fixaphoto.co.uk
for photographic restorations
|
|
|
| Re: The voice of the book [message #66 ] |
Mo, 28 März 2005 09:32 |
|
in this they are heretics.
They allege that we deny His humanity; in this they are ignorant.
2nd example: On the subject of the Holy Sacrament. We believe that, the
substance of the bread being changed, and being consubstantial with that of
the body of our Lord, Jesus Christ is therein really present. That is one
truth. Another is that this Sacrament is also a type of the cross and of
glory, and a commemoration of the two. That is the Catholic faith, which
comprehends these two truths which seem opposed.
The heresy of to-day, not conceiving that this Sacrament contains at the
same time both the presence of Jesus Christ and a type of Him, and that it
is a sacrifice and a commemoration of a sacrifice, believes that neither of
these truths can be admitted without excluding the other for this reason.
They fasten to this point alone, that this Sacrament is typical; and in this
they are not heretics. They think that we exclude this truth; hence it comes
that they raise so many objections to us out of the passages of the Fathers
which assert it. Finally, they deny the presence; and in this they are
heretics.
3rd example: Indulgences.
The shortest way, therefore, to prevent heresies is to instruct in a
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
|
|
| Re: The voice of the book [message #528 ] |
Mi, 20 April 2005 07:49 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: The voice of the book [message #23421 ] |
Di, 26 April 2005 15:46 |
|
Fat Sam wrote:
> I've just bumped into Steven Fry in my local Waitrose.
>
> Literally. Bumped into him as he strolled round the end of an aisle and
> I was bumbling along without paying any attention to the world around me.
>
> I must say, he's a lot taller than he looks on TV.
>
:-) That's a classic. Should be a line in a book somewhere.
Cheers
Simon
--
http://www.spacejock.com.au/ - Hal Spacejock, science fiction with NUTS!
http://www.andromedaspaceways.com/ - Andromeda Spaceways Inflight Magazine
|
|
|
| Re: The voice of the book [message #23430 ] |
Di, 26 April 2005 18:19 |
|
While I realize you might be trying to be helpful, at least it appears
somewhat that way, do you have to be such as ass to people who have made a
simple mistake? What good does it do you? It's people like you what cause
unrest.
Chiggy.
"Murray Watson" <JunkDTectr [at] adelphia.net> wrote in message
news:MPG.1ccfb762a222bc1e989cc5 [at] news1.news.adelphia.net...
> In news.admin.net-abuse.email - article <m7GdnabJgM65XfjfRVn-
> tA [at] comcast.com>, on Tue, 19 Apr 2005 19:36:29 -0700, Dave Adalian
> says...
>> Pie iesu domine. *WHACK* Dona eis requiemmmm *WHACK*
>>
>> Pie iesu domine. *WHACK* Dona eis requiemmmm *WHACK*
>>
>> Pie iesu domine. *WHACK* Dona eis requiemmmm *WHACK*
>>
>>
>> Chiggy.
>>
>> "Fat Sam" <janetandsam [at] beeteeinternet.co.uk> wrote in message
>> news:0fu4n6D66iiu3U1 [at] individual.net...
>> > in this they are heretics.
>> > They allege that we deny His humanity; in this they are ignorant.
>> >
>> > 2nd example: On the subject of the Holy Sacrament. We believe that, the
>
> References: <3aj4j6F68tmp6U1 [at] individual.net> <0fu4n6D66iiu3U1
> [at] individual.net>
> Followup-To: news.admin.net-abuse.email
>
> You may have noticed that your reply did not appear in your group.
> You have been duped into replying to the wrong group. The message
> was a mass-produced booby-trap intended to flood/disrupt the other
> group with responses such as yours.
>
> You will undoubtedly see this again and hopefully you and others in
> your group will have learned that it is not necessary to respond to
> everything, unless it is to inform others of the trap.
>
> Tip, look at the Newsgroups: line before you send.
>
|
|
|
