|
|
Science Fiction » alt.startrek » Re: Heterosexual content in Battlestar Galactica
| Re: Heterosexual content in Battlestar Galactica [message #145978] |
So, 09 Oktober 2005 13:14 |
|
"Louis M. Brown" <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote in message news:5oahk1ludsv08bmfps7l9ilb18v51p1n0p [at] 4ax.com...
> On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:52:59 -0700, "John Shocked"
> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>"Louis M. Brown" <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote in message news:fmkgk1ld0pg6757tnjnej9cs3vc5qe2pjg [at] 4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 05:33:33 -0700, "John Shocked"
>>> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>"Cyde Weys" <cydeweys [at] gmail.com> wrote in message news:1128750743.437375.184080 [at] g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>> Earl Grieda wrote:
>>>>>> The problem is your "parody" is not original. It was done nearly a year
>>>>>> ago. Now it is killfile material. However, Bryan did make a nice
>>>>>> correlation between your two posts, neither of which really said anything useful.
>>>>> John Shocked has been at this for a YEAR?!!
>>>>Wrong.I have been on this Newsgroup since around April.
>>>>Check Google Groups for all the details of how and when it began and when Grieda and
>>>>other BSG Hollywood Homosexual public relations workers started their campaign to interfere
>>>>with my right to speak here.
>>>>Politics
>>> How exactly is it that replying to your posts is 'interfering' with
>>> your 'right' to post here?
>>> -LMB
> <snipping ranting bullshit, AKA standard reply>
> Nice dodge, now how about you actually answer the question?
The answer is in there. Read it again. Here is another chance.
============================================================ ====================
As anyone can see from the conflict which has been going on here on this alt.battlestar-galactica Usenet
Newsgroup, Hollywood Homosexuals Neo- Conservatives are desperate on this public forums to spread their
propaganda and to censor anyone who would disagree with them.
Their goals are mainly to spread support for:
1) Homosexuality on your TV in the Movies to you and your kids, and
2) Hate for Arabs/Moslems and support the war effort to con Americans to abuse its military might to
massacre 100,000's of defenseless Arabs/Moslems.
Many of these people working on these Newsgroups are obviously paid Hollywood Homosexual Neo-Conservative
public relations workers.
Thus, if you go to a "moderated" forum, you may well find that no conflict, as is ongoing here, exists. But
why ? It is because those Hollywood Homosexuals "moderated" Blogs and Web 'Fan' Sites are able to Ban people
that disagree with them from the site and Delete any messages posted by such people. Of course such behavior is
Censorship. So what does this mean ?
It means that whatever you read on such public forums is Not the truth and is controlled by Hollywood
Homosexual interests in a self-serving manner so that criticism of the goals they really care about is
eliminated. Thus you are not reading the truth on any such public forums.
The only public forum that more or less grants full Free Speech is the Usenet Newsgroups. While you may have to
tolerate insipid behavior by some people engaging in name-calling, swearwords, epithets etc, (usually by these
very same Hollywood Homosexual paid hacks) you always know that anyone who is determined to post the Truth on a
Usenet Newsgroup can do so, with no fear that they will be Banned from the forum and their messages Deleted.
Me, I like to go where I can find the Truth; I do not care what else is going on there.
============================================================ ====================
============================================================ ====================
As I have stated, the BSG public relations hacks working on this Newsgroup are desperate to put out the fire,
any way that can be accomplished.
1) Insults, threats and other attempts to intimidate me did not work.
2) False Complaints to my ISP did not work.
3) Now, the only other choice they have is to exploit the weakness and loneliness of the few true viewers of the BSG series
who are left here leveraging their fake friendship with those left as a bargaining chip to dissuade them from responding to my
messages.
Generally in situations like this the people who are left on these Newsgroups after all of these personal
attack campaigns have succumbed to the attacks and have been co-opted by the BSG public relations hacks, sheep
to herded whichever way the BSG Hollywood Homosexual hacks lead.
These BSG HH hacks threaten Newsgroup members, claiming they will not converse with anyone who criticizes BSG,
or anyone else who converses with anyone who criticizes the BSG series. The joke is: why would anyone want to
converse with anyone whose sole job on this Newsgroup is to support BSG and sell BSG related products, like DVDs ?
And those wealthy fatcat BSG Hollywood Homosexuals make their living off chumps/stooges. You think these
fatcats are going to specially stop off their private jet, chauffeur to your house, shake your hand and thank
you for defending their right to pervert you and your kid ? You are just another piece of trash to be
manipulated and run over as far as they are concerned.
When I express my free speech on the Scifi web site, they Ban me from their forum. Get the message what they
think about your right to free speech ?
============================================================ ====================
>>When I express my free speech on the Scifi web site, they Ban me from their forum.
> Your posts violated their AUP. They own their forums, their websites,
> and probably the equipment that hosts said website. Like I said
> before, they have the right to ban anyone they want to from their property.
All of the wireways and telephone poles through which the signals are transmitted are obtained
by easements rendered by State and Federal Law. States and the Federal government have control
over who can obtain access to these media.
Besides, the States and Federal government can pass laws to control fraud and deception any time they want.
>> Get the message what they think about your right to free speech ?
> No, I get the message that they don't want their forums turning into
> massive flamewars and homophobic ranting. That sort of thing IS bad
> for their image, especially if you consider the relative size of
> Scifi's following compared to more mainstream networks.
> -LMB
If they do not want "flamewars" then they should ban anyone who:
1) insults other people,
2) calls other people epithets,
3) threatens other people in any way.
That is how you dissolve flame wars. Simple. I never do any of those things.
My discussions are strictly on the issues, and in their case specifically the issues which BSG poses,
by bring Sodomy into the house of you and your kids, in a campaign to sell your Son on the idea
that Sodomy is good for him and he should try some of it.
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Heterosexual content in Battlestar Galactica [message #145990 ] |
Mo, 10 Oktober 2005 09:08 |
|
On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:14:59 -0700, "John Shocked"
<jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>"Louis M. Brown" <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote in message news:5oahk1ludsv08bmfps7l9ilb18v51p1n0p [at] 4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:52:59 -0700, "John Shocked"
>> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>"Louis M. Brown" <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote in message news:fmkgk1ld0pg6757tnjnej9cs3vc5qe2pjg [at] 4ax.com...
>>>> On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 05:33:33 -0700, "John Shocked"
>>>> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>"Cyde Weys" <cydeweys [at] gmail.com> wrote in message news:1128750743.437375.184080 [at] g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>> Earl Grieda wrote:
>>>>>>> The problem is your "parody" is not original. It was done nearly a year
>>>>>>> ago. Now it is killfile material. However, Bryan did make a nice
>>>>>>> correlation between your two posts, neither of which really said anything useful.
>>>>>> John Shocked has been at this for a YEAR?!!
>>>>>Wrong.I have been on this Newsgroup since around April.
>>>>>Check Google Groups for all the details of how and when it began and when Grieda and
>>>>>other BSG Hollywood Homosexual public relations workers started their campaign to interfere
>>>>>with my right to speak here.
>>>>>Politics
>>>> How exactly is it that replying to your posts is 'interfering' with
>>>> your 'right' to post here?
>>>> -LMB
>> <snipping ranting bullshit, AKA standard reply>
>> Nice dodge, now how about you actually answer the question?
>
>The answer is in there. Read it again. Here is another chance.
<snipping BS yet AGAIN>
>>>When I express my free speech on the Scifi web site, they Ban me from their forum.
>> Your posts violated their AUP. They own their forums, their websites,
>> and probably the equipment that hosts said website. Like I said
>> before, they have the right to ban anyone they want to from their property.
>
>All of the wireways and telephone poles through which the signals are transmitted are obtained
>by easements rendered by State and Federal Law. States and the Federal government have control
>over who can obtain access to these media.
>Besides, the States and Federal government can pass laws to control fraud and deception any time they want.
And yet, they don't own the servers, the code, images, and other
resources purchased by the scifi.com owners. Those same resources are
offered for public use provided you don't violate their terms of use.
You violated those terms, now you can't post there, get it?
As far as the "wireways and telephone poles" bit goes, they're not
stopping you from using the internet, merely the small piece of it
they own.
>
>>> Get the message what they think about your right to free speech ?
>> No, I get the message that they don't want their forums turning into
>> massive flamewars and homophobic ranting. That sort of thing IS bad
>> for their image, especially if you consider the relative size of
>> Scifi's following compared to more mainstream networks.
>> -LMB
>
>If they do not want "flamewars" then they should ban anyone who:
>1) insults other people,
>2) calls other people epithets,
>3) threatens other people in any way.
4) posts threads which don't in any way serve a constructive purpose.
Say, the BSG homosexuality things. Look what it's done for the
environment in the above groups, (hereby pared back down to the bare
minimum, )
Now, given how most folks here are responding to you (either by
killfiling you or basically discrediting you,) do you honestly think
it'd be a good idea for Scifi.com to keep you, a man who is
effectively SLANDERING them, around?
>
>That is how you dissolve flame wars.
One particular site I visit has a good way to handle these things.
Discussions on homosexuality, religion, and abortion are generally
frowned upon, as those topics almost ALWAYS degenerate into asinine
flamewars. And ya know what? There's practically no flaming there.
> Simple. I never do any of those things.
No, you just harp on the same TIRED fucking subject, over and over and
over and over.... You make people wonder if you're a closet homo
raging against his own internalized self-hatred.
>My discussions are strictly on the issues, and in their case specifically the issues which BSG poses,
Your 'discussions' are strictly speculation supported only by twisting
unrelated words to fit your own odd little worldview.
>by bring Sodomy into the house of you and your kids, in a campaign to sell your Son on the idea
>that Sodomy is good for him and he should try some of it.
>
>Politics
And yet, you STILL haven't actually proven sodomy exists in BSG.
Until it's actually shown on the screen, YOU NEVER WILL.
-LMB
|
|
|
| Re: Heterosexual content in Battlestar Galactica [message #145991 ] |
Mo, 10 Oktober 2005 09:20 |
|
"Louis M. Brown" <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote in message
news:f9kjk1p6qhg4t3e81i9jr7a56d0bm07el0 [at] 4ax.com...
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:14:59 -0700, "John Shocked"
> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>>When I express my free speech on the Scifi web site, they Ban me from
their forum.
> And yet, they don't own the servers, the code, images, and other
> resources purchased by the scifi.com owners. Those same resources are
> offered for public use provided you don't violate their terms of use.
> You violated those terms, now you can't post there, get it?
> As far as the "wireways and telephone poles" bit goes, they're not
> stopping you from using the internet, merely the small piece of it
> they own.
John Shocked is a subscriber to Cox Communications. As such he has agreed
to abide by the Cox's Acceptable Use Policy (AUP). Yet, he continues to
violate the Cox AUP by cross-posting off-topic, hate-filled, libelous spam
posts. Forward any and all posts by John Shocked to abuse [at] cox.net Also,
provide the post headers and a brief comment asking Cox to drop him as a
customer.
Cox AUP: http://www.cox.com/policy/
|
|
|
| Re: Heterosexual content in Battlestar Galactica [message #145992 ] |
Mo, 10 Oktober 2005 11:03 |
|
From the Collected Witterings of Louis M. Brown, volume 23:
> And yet, you STILL haven't actually proven sodomy exists in BSG.
He doesn't have to; we know for a fact that sodomy exists in BSG. Sodomy
includes rape - in fact, both biblically and technically sodomy and rape are
interchangeable terms; the sin of the Sodomites was wanting to rape, not teh
icky buttsex [1].
With that in mind, there *is* now empirical proof that BSG does not promote
sodomy, as the main characters have demonstrated their extreme opposition to
it.
[1] Apologies to any APHids with a jones for annoying the Church ... if you
would like to carry on sinning, perhaps you could try gomorrahy? :)
--
Who the f--k are you calling insolent?
|
|
|
| Re: Heterosexual content in Battlestar Galactica [message #145993 ] |
Mo, 10 Oktober 2005 12:12 |
|
"David Chapman" <jedit_ojanen8 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message news:n4WdnfgwAYOJq9feRVnysg [at] pipex.net...
> From the Collected Witterings of Louis M. Brown, volume 23:
>> And yet, you STILL haven't actually proven sodomy exists in BSG.
> He doesn't have to; we know for a fact that sodomy exists in BSG. Sodomy includes rape - in fact, both biblically and technically
> sodomy and rape are interchangeable terms; the sin of the Sodomites was wanting to rape, not teh icky buttsex [1].
> With that in mind, there *is* now empirical proof that BSG does not promote sodomy, as the main characters have demonstrated their
> extreme opposition to it.
> [1] Apologies to any APHids with a jones for annoying the Church ... if you would like to carry on sinning, perhaps you could try
> gomorrahy? :)
The assertion that the crowd of men outside Lot's door wanted to rape the men inside has
been proven to have no basis in the text of the Genesis book of the bible.
The sin that is punished in the Sodom and Gomorrah story is Sodomy. Simple.
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Heterosexual content in Battlestar Galactica [message #145994 ] |
Mo, 10 Oktober 2005 12:48 |
|
"Louis M. Brown" <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote in message news:f9kjk1p6qhg4t3e81i9jr7a56d0bm07el0 [at] 4ax.com...
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:14:59 -0700, "John Shocked"
> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>"Louis M. Brown" <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote in message news:5oahk1ludsv08bmfps7l9ilb18v51p1n0p [at] 4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:52:59 -0700, "John Shocked"
>>> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>"Louis M. Brown" <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote in message news:fmkgk1ld0pg6757tnjnej9cs3vc5qe2pjg [at] 4ax.com...
>>>>> On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 05:33:33 -0700, "John Shocked"
>>>>> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>"Cyde Weys" <cydeweys [at] gmail.com> wrote in message news:1128750743.437375.184080 [at] g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>> Earl Grieda wrote:
>>>>>>>> The problem is your "parody" is not original. It was done nearly a year
>>>>>>>> ago. Now it is killfile material. However, Bryan did make a nice
>>>>>>>> correlation between your two posts, neither of which really said anything useful.
>>>>>>> John Shocked has been at this for a YEAR?!!
>>>>>>Wrong.I have been on this Newsgroup since around April.
>>>>>>Check Google Groups for all the details of how and when it began and when Grieda and
>>>>>>other BSG Hollywood Homosexual public relations workers started their campaign to interfere
>>>>>>with my right to speak here.
>>>>>>Politics
>>>>> How exactly is it that replying to your posts is 'interfering' with
>>>>> your 'right' to post here?
>>>>> -LMB
>>> <snipping ranting bullshit, AKA standard reply>
>>> Nice dodge, now how about you actually answer the question?
>>The answer is in there. Read it again. Here is another chance.
> <snipping BS yet AGAIN>
>>>>When I express my free speech on the Scifi web site, they Ban me from their forum.
>>> Your posts violated their AUP. They own their forums, their websites,
>>> and probably the equipment that hosts said website. Like I said
>>> before, they have the right to ban anyone they want to from their property.
>>All of the wireways and telephone poles through which the signals are transmitted are obtained
>>by easements rendered by State and Federal Law. States and the Federal government have control
>>over who can obtain access to these media.
>>Besides, the States and Federal government can pass laws to control fraud and deception any time they want.
> And yet, they don't own the servers, the code, images, and other
> resources purchased by the scifi.com owners. Those same resources are
> offered for public use provided you don't violate their terms of use.
> You violated those terms, now you can't post there, get it?
> As far as the "wireways and telephone poles" bit goes, they're not
> stopping you from using the internet, merely the small piece of it they own.
The State and Federal government have the right to regulate anything which is presented over
media which they the government are making available to content companies through force of law.
>>>> Get the message what they think about your right to free speech ?
>>> No, I get the message that they don't want their forums turning into
>>> massive flamewars and homophobic ranting. That sort of thing IS bad
>>> for their image, especially if you consider the relative size of
>>> Scifi's following compared to more mainstream networks.
>>> -LMB
>>If they do not want "flamewars" then they should ban anyone who:
>>1) insults other people,
>>2) calls other people epithets,
>>3) threatens other people in any way.
> 4) posts threads which don't in any way serve a constructive purpose.
> Say, the BSG homosexuality things. Look what it's done for the
> environment in the above groups, (hereby pared back down to the bare
> minimum, )
> Now, given how most folks here are responding to you (either by
> killfiling you or basically discrediting you,) do you honestly think
> it'd be a good idea for Scifi.com to keep you, a man who is
> effectively SLANDERING them, around?
I am telling the truth about Scifi Channel's content, and all of the people responding to me here
know that. The more raw information that reaches the public in general about the devious designs
they and BSG have for you and your kid, the less powerful and transformative it is.
>>That is how you dissolve flame wars.
> One particular site I visit has a good way to handle these things.
> Discussions on homosexuality, religion, and abortion are generally
> frowned upon, as those topics almost ALWAYS degenerate into asinine
> flamewars. And ya know what? There's practically no flaming there.
Then that is not free speech. Those are some of the most hotly contested issues in the country and must be
discussed, especially when one side of that dispute has a stramglehold on Hollywood and is forcing their
muck down the throat of you and your kids.
>> Simple. I never do any of those things.
> No, you just harp on the same TIRED fucking subject, over and over and
> over and over.... You make people wonder if you're a closet homo
> raging against his own internalized self-hatred.
When people are tired of it, they should not respond. But anyone watching BSG knows that what I am talking
about is a live issue and affects them and the people close to them.
One of the really important things that has come out in the discussions here is the dishonest tactics
of the people on your side of these issues. You think people do not recognize that you just deleted
the following text out of your response ?
You are the elite, and they are just dumb pieces of trash, right ?
========================================================
If they do not want "flamewars" then they should ban anyone who:
1) insults other people,
2) calls other people epithets,
3) threatens other people in any way.
That is how you dissolve flame wars. Simple. I never do any of those things.
My discussions are strictly on the issues, and in their case specifically the issues which BSG poses,
by bring Sodomy into the house of you and your kids, in a campaign to sell your Son on the idea
that Sodomy is good for him and he should try some of it.
========================================================
>>My discussions are strictly on the issues, and in their case specifically the issues which BSG poses,
> Your 'discussions' are strictly speculation supported only by twisting
> unrelated words to fit your own odd little worldview.
Your responsibility is to disprove my arguments. If they are so wrong, that should be easy for you.
>>by [bringing] Sodomy into the house of you and your kids, in a campaign to sell your Son on the idea
>>that Sodomy is good for him and he should try some of it.
>>Politics
> And yet, you STILL haven't actually proven sodomy exists in BSG.
> Until it's actually shown on the screen, YOU NEVER WILL.
> -LMB
I have proven Sodomy symbolism exists in BSG on several occasions.
============================================================ ===
When, in the new Battlestar Galactica second season promotion video advertisement (promo), we see Apollo scream
in tears "he's my father !", is this a promo for an action science fiction series, featuring the series main male
lead character, or a homosexual promotion series, masquerading as a science fiction series ?
Homosexuals are known to have problematic relationships with their fathers. Apollo already has been clearly
portrayed in Season 1 with subtle subliminal symbolisms as being a homosexual in the closet.
The BSG series has used subtle imagery such as Sodomy imagery from the Oz HBO (homosexual dominated US premium
station) prison based series in which homosexual rape and sex were shown regularly. BSG Season 1 clearly linked
Apollo in a subtle homosexual relationship with the Tom Zerak character.
So, is this to be Apollo's big year to come out as a full blown homosexual and show the science fiction viewing
public how great it is to be a homosexual and how great Sodomy is for you and your kids ? If it is, Hollywood
Homosexuals Neo-Conservatives are going to be jumping around slapping high fives and looking forward to bringing
you and your kids into their family.
And if you like that, these same Neo-Conservatives have an ongoing war/massacre in Iraq and a few other planned
wars/massacres against other Arab/Moslem nations in the Middle East they want to invite you to send your kids to
fight. While their kids go to strictly Ivy League schools and avoid service. Hollywood Homosexuals Neo-
Conservatives have plans for you and your kids. Trust yourself and your kids to them.
Stay tuned to find out the result of this BSG Sodomy out of the closet cliffhanger in the new second season of
Battlestar Galactica.
=======================News report from Scifi Channel======================
News Bulletin from the Scifi Channel web site www.scifi.com
about homosexual science fiction storylines for you and your kids:
http://www.scifi.com/sfw/issue390/news.html
=======================search 2/3 down page=============================
Gaylactic Awards Presented Organizers announced the winners of the Gaylactic Spectrum Awards, created by the
Gaylactic Network, an organization for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender fans of SF, fantasy and horror.
The awards honor works that deal positively with gay characters, themes and issues.
The Gaylactic Spectrum Awards Foundation was created in 2002 to manage and further the mission of the awards to
educate and raise awareness of such content in SF&F. Awards were presented in three categories for works
originally released in 2003.
The 2004 Gaylactic Spectrum Awards were presented at the World
Science Fiction Convention in Boston on Sept. 5. A list of winners follows.
Best Novel. The Salt Roads by Nalo Hopkinson
Best Short Fiction. "Lark Till Dawn, Princess" by Barth Anderson
Best Other Work
.. Angels in America, by Tony Kushner, HBO, et al.
.. Gotham Central: Half a Life (issues 6-10), by Greg Rucka and Michael Lark
============================================================ ========
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Heterosexual content in Battlestar Galactica [message #145995 ] |
Mo, 10 Oktober 2005 13:02 |
|
Louis M. Brown wrote:
> On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:14:59 -0700, "John Shocked"
> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>"Louis M. Brown" <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote in message news:5oahk1ludsv08bmfps7l9ilb18v51p1n0p [at] 4ax.com...
>>
>>>On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:52:59 -0700, "John Shocked"
>>><jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Louis M. Brown" <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote in message news:fmkgk1ld0pg6757tnjnej9cs3vc5qe2pjg [at] 4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>>>On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 05:33:33 -0700, "John Shocked"
>>>>><jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Cyde Weys" <cydeweys [at] gmail.com> wrote in message news:1128750743.437375.184080 [at] g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Earl Grieda wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>The problem is your "parody" is not original. It was done nearly a year
>>>>>>>>ago. Now it is killfile material. However, Bryan did make a nice
>>>>>>>>correlation between your two posts, neither of which really said anything useful.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>John Shocked has been at this for a YEAR?!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Wrong.I have been on this Newsgroup since around April.
>>>>>>Check Google Groups for all the details of how and when it began and when Grieda and
>>>>>>other BSG Hollywood Homosexual public relations workers started their campaign to interfere
>>>>>>with my right to speak here.
>>>>>>Politics
sad, Loony boy doesn't even remember when he started ranting. I joined
this group in February and JS was already in full swing.
Jackass doesn't even know how long he's been trolling.
|
|
|
| Re: Heterosexual content in Battlestar Galactica [message #147534 ] |
Mo, 10 Oktober 2005 14:01 |
|
From the Collected Witterings of Bryan, volume 23:
> Jackass doesn't even know how long he's been trolling.
I believe we had already established that one day is very like another for
him.
--
Who the f--k are you calling insolent?
|
|
|
| Re: Heterosexual content in Battlestar Galactica [message #147535 ] |
Mo, 10 Oktober 2005 15:10 |
|
"Bryan" <cyberbmcd [at] optonline.net> wrote in message news:_2s2f.38329$Xa.3754 [at] fe12.lga...
> Louis M. Brown wrote:
>> On Sun, 9 Oct 2005 04:14:59 -0700, "John Shocked"
>> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>"Louis M. Brown" <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote in message news:5oahk1ludsv08bmfps7l9ilb18v51p1n0p [at] 4ax.com...
>>>>On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 19:52:59 -0700, "John Shocked"
>>>><jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>"Louis M. Brown" <phyphor [at] rocketmail.com> wrote in message news:fmkgk1ld0pg6757tnjnej9cs3vc5qe2pjg [at] 4ax.com...
>>>>>>On Sat, 8 Oct 2005 05:33:33 -0700, "John Shocked"
>>>>>><jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>"Cyde Weys" <cydeweys [at] gmail.com> wrote in message news:1128750743.437375.184080 [at] g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>>>>>>Earl Grieda wrote:
>>>>>>>>>The problem is your "parody" is not original. It was done nearly a year
>>>>>>>>>ago. Now it is killfile material. However, Bryan did make a nice
>>>>>>>>>correlation between your two posts, neither of which really said anything useful.
>>>>>>>>John Shocked has been at this for a YEAR?!!
>>>>>>>Wrong.I have been on this Newsgroup since around April.
>>>>>>>Check Google Groups for all the details of how and when it began and when Grieda and
>>>>>>>other BSG Hollywood Homosexual public relations workers started their campaign to interfere
>>>>>>>with my right to speak here.
>>>>>>>Politics
> sad, Loony boy doesn't even remember when he started ranting. I joined this group in February and JS was already in full swing.
> Jackass doesn't even know how long he's been trolling.
I just checked on Google Groups. The record shows that my first message here was on March 13 2005.
Of course, as I have stated before, I was on the Scifi BSG site briefly, 2 months earlier than that,
which started the whole scenario, in which other institutions like SNL and TV Guide recognized
what I did and either started parodying it or asking hard questions about it.
The following is where history was made originally here on the Usenet:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.battlestar-galactica/brow se_frm/thread/5e71226531c1eb6f?q=%2B%22john+shocked%22+%2B%2 2sunny%22&hl=en&
Politics
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Do Feb 9 05:33:44 CET 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,06840 Sekunden |
