| OT in rabt only - Katrina and New Orleans discussions [message #131919] |
Fr, 09 September 2005 15:07 |
|
I would just like to point out to regulars of both groups the vibrant
discussions on the above topics going on in aft.
God help any of the WASP wankers from either group who hassle me about
posting political comment to aft in future.
You have been warned.
M.
|
|
|
| Elmer Fudd with a can of Waid (Was Re: OT in rabt only - Katrinaand New Orleans discussions) [message #131927 ] |
Fr, 09 September 2005 18:24 |
|
SSSSShh! Be vewy, vewy qwiet. I'm twacking the wast of those wascally
wasp wankers.
eh-eh-eh-eh-eh :-)
|
|
|
| Re: OT in rabt only - Katrina and New Orleans discussions [message #131937 ] |
Sa, 10 September 2005 02:39 |
|
"Michael O'Neill" <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> wrote in message
news:43218921.254DC599 [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie...
>I would just like to point out to regulars of both groups the vibrant
> discussions on the above topics going on in aft.
>
> God help any of the WASP wankers from either group who hassle me about
> posting political comment to aft in future.
>
> You have been warned.
>
> M.
It isn't the political commentary so much as the "foil beanie" idiocy you
like to spout.
|
|
|
| Re: OT in rabt only - Katrina and New Orleans discussions [message #131941 ] |
Sa, 10 September 2005 04:54 |
|
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 00:39:34 GMT in rec.arts.books.tolkien, Bajori
favored us with...
>
> "Michael O'Neill" <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> wrote in message
> news:43218921.254DC599 [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie...
> >I would just like to point out to regulars of both groups the vibrant
> > discussions on the above topics going on in aft.
> >
> > God help any of the WASP wankers from either group who hassle me about
> > posting political comment to aft in future.
> >
> > You have been warned.
> >
> > M.
>
> It isn't the political commentary so much as the "foil beanie" idiocy you
> like to spout.
So why repost it?
If you hadn't done that, those of us who have killfiled him wouldn't
have had to read it.
Of course he's wrong about it being OT only in rabt -- aft is about
Tolkien too. Whether OT articles are more tolerated there I couldn't
say, but a crime is still a crime whether the culprit is punished or
not.
--
Stan Brown, Oak Road Systems, Cortland County, New York, USA
http://OakRoadSystems.com
Tolkien FAQs: http://Tolkien.slimy.com (Steuard Jensen's site)
Tolkien letters FAQ:
http://users.telerama.com/~taliesen/tolkien/lettersfaq.html
FAQ of the Rings: http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/ringfaq.htm
Encyclopedia of Arda: http://www.glyphweb.com/arda/default.htm
more FAQs: http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/faqget.htm
|
|
|
| Re: OT in rabt only - Katrina and New Orleans discussions [message #131942 ] |
Sa, 10 September 2005 04:59 |
|
Stan Brown wrote:
>
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 00:39:34 GMT in rec.arts.books.tolkien, Bajori
> favored us with...
> >
> > "Michael O'Neill" <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> wrote in message
> > news:43218921.254DC599 [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie...
> > >I would just like to point out to regulars of both groups the vibrant
> > > discussions on the above topics going on in aft.
> > >
> > > God help any of the WASP wankers from either group who hassle me about
> > > posting political comment to aft in future.
> > >
> > > You have been warned.
> > >
> > > M.
> >
> > It isn't the political commentary so much as the "foil beanie" idiocy you
> > like to spout.
>
> So why repost it?
>
> If you hadn't done that, those of us who have killfiled him wouldn't
> have had to read it.
>
> Of course he's wrong about it being OT only in rabt -- aft is about
> Tolkien too. Whether OT articles are more tolerated there I couldn't
> say, but a crime is still a crime whether the culprit is punished or
> not.
For all your obvious intelligence Stan, you're one anal-retentive prat
sometimes...
M.
|
|
|
| Re: OT in rabt only - Katrina and New Orleans discussions [message #131945 ] |
Sa, 10 September 2005 05:19 |
|
Bajori wrote:
>
> "Michael O'Neill" <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> wrote in message
> news:43218921.254DC599 [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie...
> >I would just like to point out to regulars of both groups the vibrant
> > discussions on the above topics going on in aft.
> >
> > God help any of the WASP wankers from either group who hassle me about
> > posting political comment to aft in future.
> >
> > You have been warned.
> >
> > M.
> It isn't the political commentary so much
> as the "foil beanie" idiocy you
> like to spout.
I think its a blindfold you were given at birth or shortly afterward,
that you cannot bear to hear criticism of your government and label all
of it "foil beany" idiocy.
Even going on what's in the National Security Archive and the Zapruder
film, democracy in your country was overthrown in 1963 and it has been
run by war criminals since, who cannot keep their noses out of other
countries business.
I don't equate Kennedy with the personification democracy BTW - the man
had plenty of faults - but he was one of the few who went against the
tide of corruption that follows the military industrial complex around
like the plague, the Carter interregnum having arguably done more harm
than good on a lot of fronts.
As for Clinton, it was during his term as Governor that the drug running
through Mena Arkansas reached its peak. Another corrupt president who
deserved to be impeached, but not for the stained dress.
Nor is America alone in what they do. Other countries have done all of
this and more, most notably France, England and Spain at different times,
but none of them became the greatest world power during their time of
influence. On the contrary, there were always other players to balance
them off.
On one simple matter the proof is irrefutable and has been in the public
eye for forty years. The wound that killed Kennedy didn't come from the
book depository. The wound that blew 20% of his brain out through the
BACK of his head was an EXIT wound. The Zapruder tape shows him facing
forward in the car when it happened. The autopsy confirms the rear his
his head and brains ended up on the back seat and trunk of the limo.
This assassination didn't happen by accident and the main players are
well known: George H. W. Bush, Howard Hunt, Lee Harvey Oswald, Jack Ruby,
Felix Rodriguez, Richard Nixon and Berriman Seal. There were others, but
those names suffice to show that there was more than one person known to
be in on the kill - at the time.
You can comfort yourself if you wish, as so many Americans do when
confronted with proof of their governments perfidy, lies and cover up of
the events behind that terrible day, by pointing to the "foil beanie"
idiocy as you call it, but that level of corruption continues to this day
and its getting worse.
I've done the research. I have the files and references. Good research
and fact-checking is part of my profession. At some point the faceless
thousands of billionaires behind that kill will have to be called to
account. Ironically it may well be your descendants that will do it.
M.
|
|
|
| Re: OT in rabt only - Katrina and New Orleans discussions [message #131953 ] |
Sa, 10 September 2005 07:25 |
|
Michael O'Neill wrote:
> God help any of the WASP wankers from either group who hassle me about
> posting political comment to aft in future.
Usually you only catch flak for cross-posting
political comment on RABT, and not only by
WASPs or wankers.
> You have been warned.
Oooo, scary.
-- FotW
Reality is for those who cannot cope with Middle-earth.
|
|
|
| Re: Elmer Fudd with a can of Waid (Was Re: OT in rabt only - Katrina and New Orleans discussions) [message #131962 ] |
Sa, 10 September 2005 20:32 |
|
On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 17:24:30 +0100, Belba Grubb From Stock
<barbb [at] dbtech.net> wrote:
> SSSSShh! Be vewy, vewy qwiet. I'm twacking the wast of those wascally
> wasp wankers.
>
> eh-eh-eh-eh-eh :-)
>
>
They do WHAT with wasps???
--
Jette Goldie
jette.goldie [at] gmail.com
http://www.jette.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/
http://www.livejournal.com/users/wolfette/
|
|
|
| Re: Elmer Fudd with a can of Waid (Was Re: OT in rabt only - Katrinaand New Orleans discussions) [message #131969 ] |
Sa, 10 September 2005 22:17 |
|
Jette Goldie wrote:
>> SSSSShh! Be vewy, vewy qwiet. I'm twacking the wast of those
>> wascally wasp wankers.
>>
>> eh-eh-eh-eh-eh :-)
>
> They do WHAT with wasps???
<laughing at strange mental picture>
-- FotW
Reality is for those who cannot cope with Middle-earth.
|
|
|
| Re: OT in rabt only - Katrina and New Orleans discussions [message #132050 ] |
Mo, 12 September 2005 14:55 |
|
> God help any of the WASP wankers from either group who hassle me about
> posting political comment to aft in future.
Common newsgroup troll
|
|
|
| Re: OT in rabt only - Katrina and New Orleans discussions [message #132063 ] |
Mo, 12 September 2005 17:56 |
|
ssssooo wrote:
>
> > God help any of the WASP wankers
> > from either group who hassle me about
> > posting political comment to aft in future.
>
> Co-<SLAP! SLAP! SLAP!>
Fuckwit.
M.
|
|
|
| Re: Elmer Fudd with a can of Waid (Was Re: OT in rabt only - Katrinaand New Orleans discussions) [message #132199 ] |
Mi, 14 September 2005 04:14 |
|
Jette Goldie wrote:
> On Fri, 09 Sep 2005 17:24:30 +0100, Belba Grubb From Stock
> <barbb [at] dbtech.net> wrote:
>
>> SSSSShh! Be vewy, vewy qwiet. I'm twacking the wast of those
>> wascally wasp wankers.
>>
>> eh-eh-eh-eh-eh :-)
>>
>>
>
> They do WHAT with wasps???
>
>
They wank em. It's a terrible scandal. Elmer just couldn't take it any
more and decided to take the law, and the can of Waid, I mean, Raid,
into his own hands.....
B
|
|
|
