|
|
Science Fiction » alt.startrek » Sexual view about ST I
| Sexual view about ST I [message #118585] |
Fr, 26 August 2005 14:20 |
|
Hello to everyone here.
This is my first message on these boards (published ont the startrek.com
message boards) . Maybe there are some rules that I
do not know about, I wish I could pay a great tribute towards them the best
I can. But if in any moment you think I'm out the road, tell me.
I must say that I'm French. As a French, I may have some weird views about
ST, that I deeply consider better than SW in every aspects.
My message is about a vision that came to me when I recently saw for the
first time the ST movie #1. I wondered if I were the only one to see that
image, or if some here shared this with me. When the USS Entreprise goes
through V-ger, we can see a kind of building that reveals the aspect of two
legs being spread on a gynecologist chair. I know how bizarr it could seem
to you, but I really see this. These two legs join in a sort of hole, with
two rose balloons, that I see like the ovairs (my God... but I want to go
through this ! and finally the ship enters in a world that seems to be the
beginning of all life. Whan you saw the movie, did you feel the same way the
movie, or have I to to see right now a psychiatrist ?
I have exposed my views to some French fans of ST. Noone still answers. That
bothers me a bit, I must say ;-) Thanks for your thoughts.
Raphaël, a French who thinks America as a country with multiple faces, very
annoyed that his fellows do not try to understand you, and worried about our
incapacity to see the tremendous quake in the mind of America when you were
attacked on the 11th of September. Even if it was for wrong reasons, and I'm
not equiped to judge about it, we had to be on your side all along. We were
not, and we failed.
|
|
|
| Re: Sexual view about ST I [message #118587 ] |
Fr, 26 August 2005 16:21 |
|
:) Well, you certainly have my interest peaked regarding this. I'll have
to examine the scene.
Are you referring to when the Enterprise first encounters the V'Ger ship
exterior, and Kirk orders a pass at 500m? Or are you referring to a
different scene?
Please give more precise details if you can.
Thanks.
Of course, this wouldn't be the first time Trek has slipped in high innuendo
so, if true, what else is new?? :P
"Jeune Padawan" <jeune.padawanPasdespamming [at] free.fr> wrote in message
news:430f0909$0$17733$626a14ce [at] news.free.fr...
> Hello to everyone here.
> This is my first message on these boards (published ont the startrek.com
> message boards) . Maybe there are some rules that I
> do not know about, I wish I could pay a great tribute towards them the
> best I can. But if in any moment you think I'm out the road, tell me.
> I must say that I'm French. As a French, I may have some weird views about
> ST, that I deeply consider better than SW in every aspects.
>
> My message is about a vision that came to me when I recently saw for the
> first time the ST movie #1. I wondered if I were the only one to see that
> image, or if some here shared this with me. When the USS Entreprise goes
> through V-ger, we can see a kind of building that reveals the aspect of
> two
> legs being spread on a gynecologist chair. I know how bizarr it could seem
> to you, but I really see this. These two legs join in a sort of hole, with
> two rose balloons, that I see like the ovairs (my God... but I want to go
> through this ! and finally the ship enters in a world that seems to be the
> beginning of all life. Whan you saw the movie, did you feel the same way
> the movie, or have I to to see right now a psychiatrist ?
>
> I have exposed my views to some French fans of ST. Noone still answers.
> That bothers me a bit, I must say ;-) Thanks for your thoughts.
>
> Raphaël, a French who thinks America as a country with multiple faces,
> very annoyed that his fellows do not try to understand you, and worried
> about our
> incapacity to see the tremendous quake in the mind of America when you
> were attacked on the 11th of September. Even if it was for wrong reasons,
> and I'm
> not equiped to judge about it, we had to be on your side all along. We
> were not, and we failed.
>
|
|
|
| Re: Sexual view about ST I [message #118589 ] |
Fr, 26 August 2005 16:42 |
|
"Snake" <fluidstates_NO+SPAM [at] REMOVE-ME.verizon.IHATESPAM.SPAM_VAC.com> a
écrit dans le message de news: TzFPe.16$LK.11 [at] trndny09...
> :) Well, you certainly have my interest peaked regarding this. I'll have
> to examine the scene.
>
> Are you referring to when the Enterprise first encounters the V'Ger ship
> exterior, and Kirk orders a pass at 500m?
Exactly : Uss Enterprise has two kind of round and horizontal buildings
which are beside her.
I want to add it's not a kind of a misleading in my psychiatric mind : I'm
sure of what I say and saw.
Maybe you know "L'Origine du Monde" paint by Gustave Courbet. That's exactly
the same : http://www.artyst.net/C/Courbet19/CourbetOriginemonde19.htm
Or are you referring to a
> different scene?
>
> Please give more precise details if you can.
>
> Thanks.
|
|
|
| Re: Sexual view about ST I [message #118590 ] |
Fr, 26 August 2005 16:43 |
|
Jeune Padawan wrote:
> Hello to everyone here.
> This is my first message on these boards (published ont the
> startrek.com message boards) . Maybe there are some rules that I
> do not know about, I wish I could pay a great tribute towards them
> the best I can. But if in any moment you think I'm out the road, tell
> me. I must say that I'm French. As a French, I may have some weird views
> about ST, that I deeply consider better than SW in every aspects.
>
And yet you call yourself a young padawan! ;-)
As for the weird... That's not exclusively French.
> My message is about a vision that came to me when I recently saw for
> the first time the ST movie #1. I wondered if I were the only one to
> see that image, or if some here shared this with me. When the USS
> Entreprise goes through V-ger, we can see a kind of building that
> reveals the aspect of two legs being spread on a gynecologist chair.
> I know how bizarr it could seem to you, but I really see this. These
> two legs join in a sort of hole, with two rose balloons, that I see
> like the ovairs (my God... but I want to go through this ! and
> finally the ship enters in a world that seems to be the beginning of
> all life. Whan you saw the movie, did you feel the same way the
> movie, or have I to to see right now a psychiatrist ?
Err... No, I didn't think of those things.
But I don't think that you need to see a shrink either.
I myself sometimes see some distinct female aspects in the original
Enterprise. The belly of her saucer section, her nacelles spread out, the
hangarbay between... You get the picture.
>
> I have exposed my views to some French fans of ST. Noone still
> answers. That bothers me a bit, I must say ;-) Thanks for your
> thoughts.
Maybe those other fans are just shy.
--
www.Wouter.Valentijn.name
www.zeppodunsel.nl
www.scifics.com
www.nksf.nl
liam=mail
|
|
|
| Re: Sexual view about ST I [message #118597 ] |
Fr, 26 August 2005 20:14 |
|
"Jeune Padawan" <jeune.padawanPasdespamming [at] free.fr> wrote in message
news:430f0909$0$17733$626a14ce [at] news.free.fr...
> Hello to everyone here.
> This is my first message on these boards (published ont the startrek.com
> message boards) . Maybe there are some rules that I
> do not know about, I wish I could pay a great tribute towards them the
> best I can. But if in any moment you think I'm out the road, tell me.
> I must say that I'm French. As a French, I may have some weird views about
> ST, that I deeply consider better than SW in every aspects.
>
> My message is about a vision that came to me when I recently saw for the
> first time the ST movie #1. I wondered if I were the only one to see that
> image, or if some here shared this with me. When the USS Entreprise goes
> through V-ger, we can see a kind of building that reveals the aspect of
> two
> legs being spread on a gynecologist chair. I know how bizarr it could seem
> to you, but I really see this. These two legs join in a sort of hole, with
> two rose balloons, that I see like the ovairs (my God... but I want to go
> through this ! and finally the ship enters in a world that seems to be the
> beginning of all life. Whan you saw the movie, did you feel the same way
> the movie, or have I to to see right now a psychiatrist ?
>
> I have exposed my views to some French fans of ST. Noone still answers.
> That bothers me a bit, I must say ;-) Thanks for your thoughts.
>
> Raphaël, a French who thinks America as a country with multiple faces,
> very annoyed that his fellows do not try to understand you, and worried
> about our
> incapacity to see the tremendous quake in the mind of America when you
> were attacked on the 11th of September. Even if it was for wrong reasons,
> and I'm
> not equiped to judge about it, we had to be on your side all along. We
> were not, and we failed.
>
Je beaucoup vous pense le besoin un psychiatre, particulièrement si vous
aviez recherché tous les France et Etats-Unis quelqu'un qui est d'accord
avec votre fétiche. Vous avez à ce que la communauté de psychologue se
réfère en tant que "convoitise de vaisseau spatial." Très dérangeant !
Quant à vos commentaires environ 9/11 : Je ne crois pas que les Français
doivent l'anythign aux Etats-Unis. Quand la France était les centaines de la
superpuissance du monde d'il y a années, le monde d'expression anglaise
était votre ennemi et France tournée dans le pays de touristes inutile que
c'est aujourd'hui. Quand mon grand-mère est allé visiter la France, la
broche française sur elle et a appelé son "Américain stupide." Bien, je
devine qu'il doit y avoir une certaine manière de réclamer en arrière votre
dignité - même si vous devez sélectionner sur de vieilles dames !
|
|
|
| Re: Sexual view about ST I [message #118603 ] |
Fr, 26 August 2005 23:47 |
|
"Roderick Rutlidge" <R_Rutlidge [at] barnsandnoble.com> wrote in message
news:JZIPe.24774$U63.16379 [at] fe12.lga...
>
> "Jeune Padawan" <jeune.padawanPasdespamming [at] free.fr> wrote in message
> news:430f0909$0$17733$626a14ce [at] news.free.fr...
>> Hello to everyone here.
>> This is my first message on these boards (published ont the startrek.com
>> message boards) . Maybe there are some rules that I
>> do not know about, I wish I could pay a great tribute towards them the
>> best I can. But if in any moment you think I'm out the road, tell me.
>> I must say that I'm French. As a French, I may have some weird views
>> about ST, that I deeply consider better than SW in every aspects.
>>
>> My message is about a vision that came to me when I recently saw for the
>> first time the ST movie #1. I wondered if I were the only one to see that
>> image, or if some here shared this with me. When the USS Entreprise goes
>> through V-ger, we can see a kind of building that reveals the aspect of
>> two
>> legs being spread on a gynecologist chair. I know how bizarr it could
>> seem to you, but I really see this. These two legs join in a sort of
>> hole, with
>> two rose balloons, that I see like the ovairs (my God... but I want to go
>> through this ! and finally the ship enters in a world that seems to be
>> the
>> beginning of all life. Whan you saw the movie, did you feel the same way
>> the movie, or have I to to see right now a psychiatrist ?
>>
>> I have exposed my views to some French fans of ST. Noone still answers.
>> That bothers me a bit, I must say ;-) Thanks for your thoughts.
>>
>> Raphaël, a French who thinks America as a country with multiple faces,
>> very annoyed that his fellows do not try to understand you, and worried
>> about our
>> incapacity to see the tremendous quake in the mind of America when you
>> were attacked on the 11th of September. Even if it was for wrong reasons,
>> and I'm
>> not equiped to judge about it, we had to be on your side all along. We
>> were not, and we failed.
>>
>
> Je beaucoup vous pense le besoin un psychiatre, particulièrement si vous
> aviez recherché tous les France et Etats-Unis quelqu'un qui est d'accord
> avec votre fétiche. Vous avez à ce que la communauté de psychologue se
> réfère en tant que "convoitise de vaisseau spatial." Très dérangeant !
> Quant à vos commentaires environ 9/11 : Je ne crois pas que les Français
> doivent l'anythign aux Etats-Unis. Quand la France était les centaines de
> la superpuissance du monde d'il y a années, le monde d'expression anglaise
> était votre ennemi et France tournée dans le pays de touristes inutile que
> c'est aujourd'hui. Quand mon grand-mère est allé visiter la France, la
> broche française sur elle et a appelé son "Américain stupide." Bien, je
> devine qu'il doit y avoir une certaine manière de réclamer en arrière
> votre dignité - même si vous devez sélectionner sur de vieilles dames !
Crude Translation -
I much think you the need a psychiatrist, particularly if you had sought all
France and the somebody United States which agrees with your fetish. You
have so that the community of psychologist refers as "a covetousness of
spaceship." Very disturbing! As for your comments approximately 9/11: I do
not believe that the French owe the anythign in the United States. When
France was the hundreds of the super power of the world of years ago, the
world of English expression was your enemy and France turned in the useless
country of tourists that it is today. When my grandmother went to visit
France, the French pin on and called it its "stupid American." Well, I guess
that there must be a certain manner of claiming your dignity behind - even
if you must select on old injuries!
Hmmm, I am not really sure what to make of this. . .
|
|
|
| Re: Sexual view about ST I [message #118608 ] |
Sa, 27 August 2005 00:36 |
|
On Fri, 26 Aug 2005 14:14:06 -0400, "Roderick Rutlidge"
<R_Rutlidge [at] barnsandnoble.com> wrote:
> "convoitise de vaisseau spatial."
giggle
It was worse in the 1950's when rocket ships were long, and
cylindrical, and sometimes had rounded nosecones. They looked a lot
like [transmission garbled]
--
The Merry Piper
[http://tmpiper.livejournal.com]
If you want to dance, you'll have to pay ... me!
|
|
|
| Re: Sexual view about ST I [message #118615 ] |
So, 28 August 2005 00:00 |
|
in article 430f2a9c$0$11066$e4fe514c [at] news.xs4all.nl, Wouter Valentijn at
liam [at] valentijn.nu wrote on 8/26/05 9:43 AM:
> Jeune Padawan wrote:
>> Hello to everyone here.
>> This is my first message on these boards (published ont the
>> startrek.com message boards) . Maybe there are some rules that I
>> do not know about, I wish I could pay a great tribute towards them
>> the best I can. But if in any moment you think I'm out the road, tell
>> me. I must say that I'm French. As a French, I may have some weird views
>> about ST, that I deeply consider better than SW in every aspects.
> And yet you call yourself a young padawan! ;-)
> As for the weird... That's not exclusively French.
Weird is as weird does...
>> My message is about a vision that came to me when I recently saw for
>> the first time the ST movie #1. I wondered if I were the only one to
>> see that image, or if some here shared this with me. When the USS
>> Entreprise goes through V-ger, we can see a kind of building that
>> reveals the aspect of two legs being spread on a gynecologist chair.
>> I know how bizarr it could seem to you, but I really see this. These
>> two legs join in a sort of hole, with two rose balloons, that I see
>> like the ovairs (my God... but I want to go through this ! and
>> finally the ship enters in a world that seems to be the beginning of
>> all life. Whan you saw the movie, did you feel the same way the
>> movie, or have I to to see right now a psychiatrist ?
> Err... No, I didn't think of those things.
> But I don't think that you need to see a shrink either.
> I myself sometimes see some distinct female aspects in the original
> Enterprise. The belly of her saucer section, her nacelles spread out, the
> hangarbay between... You get the picture.
Hmmm, so there might be some fetishists out there who fantasize about
backing a shuttle craft in and out of the hanger bay over and over and over?
So, is the underside of the original saucer like one big alien mono tit?
And I thought TPM had some weird-ass ideas about Trek.
>> I have exposed my views to some French fans of ST. Noone still
>> answers. That bothers me a bit, I must say ;-) Thanks for your
>> thoughts.
> Maybe those other fans are just shy.
Maybe...
--
"Too bad you can't buy a voodoo globe so that you could make the earth spin
real fast and freak everybody out."
-- "Deep Thoughts" by Jack Handey
|
|
|
| Re: Sexual view about ST I [message #118621 ] |
So, 28 August 2005 14:27 |
|
Elvis Gump wrote:
> in article 430f2a9c$0$11066$e4fe514c [at] news.xs4all.nl, Wouter Valentijn
> at liam [at] valentijn.nu wrote on 8/26/05 9:43 AM:
<snip>
>> Err... No, I didn't think of those things.
>> But I don't think that you need to see a shrink either.
>> I myself sometimes see some distinct female aspects in the original
>> Enterprise. The belly of her saucer section, her nacelles spread
>> out, the hangarbay between... You get the picture.
>
> Hmmm, so there might be some fetishists out there who fantasize about
> backing a shuttle craft in and out of the hanger bay over and over
> and over?
>
> So, is the underside of the original saucer like one big alien mono
> tit?
>
I read something similar elsewhere about the mothership in 'CEO3K' a long
time ago.
> And I thought TPM had some weird-ass ideas about Trek.
>
<grin>
--
www.Wouter.Valentijn.name
www.zeppodunsel.nl
www.scifics.com
www.nksf.nl
liam=mail
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Mi Feb 8 16:07:53 CET 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,09476 Sekunden |
