Control Systems for the Masses

Sprinkler Systems Uhaul move Lawn care Roses and trees Ford Parts Chrysler Parts Lake Powell New IPod Touch Apps New IPhone Apps IPhone Apps IPad Information IPad Apps Android APPS Android Games APPS Android Systems Android Tablets APPS and Beyond Smartphone Apps Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools Tablet PC Car Sharing Car Leasing Tabler Pc Fly Fishing Toyota Cars Vacation Rentals Stock market NYSE SSE Stock Freight & Shipping News Gluten Lactose Gout My Coupon Life Campgrounds Check Outdoor Kitchen Design and Redoo Bath Remodeling Palm Springs Las Vegas Vacation Tipps Lake Powell Boating Homes for lease Electric and green Car Blog Pearls and diamonds Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog

[Suche] [Administrator] [Hinweise zum Reader] [Startseite]

Fantasy » alt.fan.tolkien » Control Systems for the Masses

Control Systems for the Masses [message #113526]

Do, 18 August 2005 13:11

onq

I am unable to prove or deny the provenance of this document, posted
recently to alt.binaries.e-books.flood, therefore the comments herein
must be taken with a large grain of salt.

I note that the apparent results of the policies described therein on the
American public have been commented upon before now by Europeans.

The context of the current occupation of Iraq, the apparently impending
attack on Iran, the unstable situation in North Korea and the continuance
of terror activities around the world by both governments and small
groups of people make understanding the generators of these events an
imperative for any right thinking person.

This post may shed some light on some of the myths by which men sleep.

For the American mushrooms, the posters and lurkers to these groups.

M.

==========================================================

This document is the doctrine adopted by the Policy Committee of the
Bilderburg
Group during its first known meeting in 1954. A copy found in 1969 was in
the
possession of Navel Intelligence. The following document, dated May 1979,
was
found on July 7, 1986, in an IBM copier that had been purchased at a
surplus
sale.
Top Secret
Silent Weapons for a Quiet War
An Introductory Programming Manual
Operations Research
Technical Manual
WELCOME ABOARD
This publication marks the 25th anniversary of the Third World War,
called the "Quiet
War," being conducted using subjective biological warfare, fought with
"silent
weapons."
This book contains an introductory description of this war, its
strategies, and
its weaponry.
May 1979 #74-1120
SECURITY
It is patently impossible to discuss social engineering or the automation
of a
society, i.e., the engineering of social automation systems (silent
weapons) on
a national or worldwide scale without implying extensive objectives of
social
control and destruction of human life, i .e., slavery and genocide.
This manual is in itself an analog declaration of intent. Such a writing
must be
secured from public scrutiny. Otherwise, it might be recognized as a
technically
formal declaration of domestic war. Furthermore, whenever any person or
group of
persons in a position of great power, and without the full knowledge and
consent
of the public, uses such knowledge and methodology for economic conquest
-- it
must be understood that a state of domestic warfare exists between said
person
or group of persons and the public.
The solution of today's problems requires an approach which is ruthlessly
candid,
with no agonizing over religious, moral, or cultural values.
You have qualified for this project because of your ability to look at
human
society with cold objectivity, and yet analyze and discuss your
observations and
conclusions with others of similar intellectual capacity without a loss
of
discretion or humility. Such virtues are exercised in your own best
interest. Do
not deviate from them.
HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION
Silent weapon technology has evolved from Operations Research (O.R.), a
strategic and tactical methodology developed under the military
management in
England during World War II. The original purpose of Operations Research
was to
study the strategic and tactical problems of air and land defense with
the
objective of effective use of limited military resources against foreign
enemies
(i.e., logistics).
It was soon recognized by those in positions of power that the same
methods
might be useful for totally controlling a society. But better tools were
necessary.
Social engineering (the analysis and automation of a society) requires
the
correlation of great amounts of constantly changing economic information
(data),
so a high speed computerized data processing system was necessary which
could
race ahead of the society and predict when society would arrive for
capitulation.
Relay computers were too slow, but the electronic computer, invented in
1946 by
J. Presper Eckert and John W. Mauchly filled the bill.
The next breakthrough was the development of the simplex method of linear
programming in 1947 by the mathematician, George B. Dantzig.
Then, in 1948, the transistor, invented by J. Bardeen, W. H. Brattain,
and W.
Shockley, promised great expansion of the computer field by reducing
space and
power requirements.
With these three inventions under their direction, those in positions of
power
strongly suspected that it was possible for them to control the whole
world with
the push of a button.
Immediately, the Rockefeller Foundation got in on the ground floor by
making a
four year grant to Harvard College, funding the Harvard economic research
project for the study of the structure of the American economy. One year
later,
in 1949, the United States Air Force joined in.
In 1952 the original great period terminated, and a high level meeting of
the
elite was held to determine the next phase of social operations research.
The
Harvard project had been very fruitful as is borne out by the publication
of
some of its results in 1953 suggesting the feasibility of economic
(social)
engineering. (Studies in the Structure of the American Economy --
copyright 1953
by Wassily Leontief, International Sciences Press Inc., White Plains, New
York.)
Engineered in the last half decade of the 1940's, the new Quiet War
machine
stood, so to-speak, in sparkling gold plated hardware on the showroom
floor by
1954.
With the creation of the Maser in 1954, the promise of unlocking
unlimited
sources of fusion atomic energy from the heavy hydrogen in sea water and
the
consequent availability of unlimited social power became a possibility
only
decades away.
The combination was irresistible.
The Quiet War was quietly declared by the international elite at a
meeting held
in 1954.
Although the silent weapons system was nearly exposed 13 years later, the
evolution of the new weapon system has never suffered any major setbacks.
This volume marks the 25th anniversary of the beginning of the Quiet War.
Already this domestic war has had many victories on many fronts
throughout the
world.
POLITICAL INTRODUCTION
In 1954 it was well recognized by those in positions of authority that it
was
only a matter of time, only a few decades, before the general public
would be
able to grasp and upset the cradle of power, for the very elements of the
new
silent weapon technology were as accessible for a public utopia as they
were for
providing a private utopia.
The issue of primary concern that of dominance, revolved around the
subject of
the energy sciences.
ENERGY
Energy is recognized as the key to all activity on earth. Natural science
is the
study of the sources and control of natural energy, and social science,
theoretically expressed as economics, is the study of the sources and
control of
social energy. Both are bookkeeping systems; mathematics. Therefore,
mathematics
is the primary energy science. And the bookkeeper can be king if the
public can
be kept ignorant of the methodology of the bookkeeping.
All science is merely a means to an end. The means is knowledge. The end
is
control. Beyond this remains only one issue, "who will be the
beneficiary?".
In 1954 this was the issue of primary concern. Although the so-called
"moral
Issues" were raised, in view of the law of natural selection it was
agreed that
a nation or world of people who will not use their intelligence are no
better
than animals who do not have intelligence. Such a people are beasts of
burden
and steaks on the table by choice and consent.
CONSEQUENTLY, in the interest of future world order, peace, and
tranquility, it
was decided to privately wage a quiet war against the American public
with an
ultimate objective of permanently shifting the natural and social energy
(wealth)
of the undisciplined and irresponsible many into the hands of the
self-disciplined,
responsible, and worthy few.
In order to implement this objective, it was necessary to create, secure,
and
apply new weapons which, as it turned out, were a class of weapons so
subtle and
sophisticated in their principle of operation and public appearance as to
earn
for themselves the name 'silent weapons'.
In conclusion, the objective of economic research, as conducted by the
magnates
of capital (banking) and the industries of commodities (goods) and
services, is
the establishment of an economy which is totally predictable and
manipulatable.
In order to achieve a totally predictable economy, the low class elements
of the
society must be brought under total control, i.e., must be house-broken,
trained,
and assigned a yoke and long term social duties from a very early age,
before
they have an opportunity to question the propriety of the matter. In
order to
achieve such conformity, the lower class family unit must be
disintegrated by a
process of increasing preoccupation of the parents and the establishment
of
government operated day care centers for the occupationally orphaned
children.
The quality of education given to the lower class must be of the poorest
sort,
so that the meat of ignorance isolating the the inferior class from the
superior
class is and remains incomprehensible to the inferior class. With such an
initial handicap, even bright lower class individuals have little if any
hope of
extricating themselves from their assigned lot in life. This form of
slavery is
essential to maintaining some measure of social order, peace, and
tranquility
for the ruling upper class.
DESCRIPTIVE INTRODUCTION OF THE SILENT WEAPON
Everything that is expected from an ordinary weapon is expected from a
silent
weapon by its creators, but only in it its own manner of functioning.
It shoots situations, instead of bullets; propelled by data processing,
instead
of chemical reaction (explosion); originating from bits of data, instead
of
grains of gunpowder; from a computer, instead of a gun; operated by a
computer
programmer, instead of marksman; under the orders of a banking magnate,
instead
of a military general.
It makes no obvious explosive noises, causes no obvious physical or
mental
injuries, and does not obviously interfere with anyone's daily social
life.
Yet it makes an unmistakable 'noise', causes unmistakable physical and
mental
damage, and unmistakably interferes with daily social life, i.e.,
unmistakable
to a trained observer, one who knows what to look for.
The public cannot comprehend this weapon, and therefore cannot believe
that they
are being attached and subdued by a weapon.
The public might instinctively feel that something is wrong, but because
of the
technical nature of the silent weapon, they cannot express their feeling
in a
rational way, or handle the problem with intelligence. Therefore, they do
not
know how to cry for help, and do not know how to associate with others to
defend
themselves against it.
When a silent weapon is applied gradually to the public, the public
adjusts/adapts
to its presence and learns to tolerate its encroachment on their lives
until the
pressure (psychological via economic) becomes too great and they crack
up.
Therefore, the silent weapon is a type of biological war fare. It attacks
the
vitality, options, and mobility of the individuals of a society by
knowing,
understanding, manipulating, and attacking their sources of natural and
social
energy, and their physical, mental, and emotional strengths and
weaknesses.
THEORETICAL INTRODUCTION
"Give me control over a nation's currency, and I care not who makes its
laws."
Mayer Amschel Rothschild (1743-1812)
Today's silent weapons technology is an outgrowth of a simple idea
discovered,
succinctly expressed, and effectively applied by the quoted Mr. Mayor
Amschel
Rothschild. Mr. Rothschild discovered the missing passive component of
economic
theory known as economic inductance. He, of course, did not think of his
discovery in these 20th century terms, and to be sure, mathematical
analysis had
to wait for the Second Industrial Revolution, the rise of the theory of
mechanics and electronics, and finally, the invention of the electronic
computer
before it could be effectively applied in the control of the world
economy.
GENERAL ENERGY CONCEPTS
In the study of energy systems, there always appear three elementary
concepts.
These are potential energy, kinetic energy, and energy dissipation. And
corresponding to these concepts, there are three idealized, essentially
pure
physical counterparts, called passive components.
(1) In the science of physical mechanics, the phenomenon of of potential
energy
is associated with a physical property called elasticity or stiffness,
and can
be represented by a stretched spring.
In electronic science, potential energy is stored in a capacitor instead
of a
spring. This property is called capacitance instead of elasticity or
stiffness.
(2) In the science of physical mechanics, the phenomenon of kinetic
energy is
associated with a physical property called inertia or mass and can be
represented by a mass or a flywheel in motion.
In electronic science, kinetic energy is stored in an inductor (in a
magnetic
field) instead of a mass. This property is called inductance instead of
inertia.
(3) In the science of physical mechanics, the phenomenon of energy
dissipation
is associated with a physical property called friction or resistance, and
can be
represented by a dashpot or other device which converts system energy
into heat.
In electronic science, dissipation of energy is performed by an element
called
either a resistor or a conductor, the term 'resistor' being the one
generally
used to express the concept of friction, and the term 'conductor' being
generally used to describe a more ideal device (e.g., wire) employed to
convey
electric energy efficiently from one location to another. The property of
a
resistor or conductor is measured as either resistance or conductance,
reciprocals.
In economics these three energy concepts are associated with:
(1) Economic Capacitance -- Capital (money, stock/inventory, investments
in
building and durables, etc.)
(2) Economic Conductance -- Goods (production flow coefficients)
(3) Economic Inductance -- Services (the influence of the population of
industry
on output).
All of the mathematical theory developed in the study of one energy
system, (e.g.,
mechanics, electronics, etc.) can be immediately applied in the study of
any
other energy system (e.g., economics).
MR. ROTHSCHILD'S ENERGY DISCOVERY
What Mr. Rothschild had discovered was the basic principle of power,
influence,
and control over people as applied to economics. That principle is "when
you
assume the appearance of power, people soon give it to you".
Mr. Rothschild had discovered that currency or deposit loan accounts had
the
required appearance of power that could be used to induce people
(inductance,
with people corresponding to a magnetic field) into surrendering their
real
wealth in exchange for a promise of greater wealth (instead of real
compensation).
They would put up real collateral in exchange for a loan of promissory
notes. Mr.
Rothschild found that he could issue more notes than he had backing for,
so long
as he had someone's stock of gold as a persuader to show to his
customers.
Mr. Rothschild loaned his promissory notes to individuals and to
governments.
These would create over-confidence. Then he would make money scarce,
tighten
control of the system, and collect his collateral through the obligation
of
contracts. The cycle was then repeated. These pressures could be used to
ignite
a war. Then he would control the availability of currency to determine
who would
win the war. That government which agreed to give him control of its
economic
system got his support. Collection of debts was guaranteed by economic
aid to
the enemy of the debtor. The profit derived from this economic
methodology made
Mr. Rothschild all the more wealthy and all the more able to extend his
wealth.
He found that the public greed would allow currency to be printed by
government
order beyond the limits (inflation) of backing in precious metal or the
production of goods and services (gross national product, GNP).
APPARENT CAPITAL AS "PAPER" INDUCTOR
In this structure, credit, presented as a pure circuit element called
"currency",
has the appearance of capital, but is, in fact, negative capital. Hence,
it has
the appearance of service, but is, in fact, indebtedness or debt. It is
therefore an economic inductance instead of an economic capacitance, and
if
balanced in no other way, will be balanced by the negation of population
(war,
genocide). The total goods and services represents real capital called
the gross
national product, and currency may be printed up to this level and still
represent economic capacitance; but currency printed beyond this level is
subtractive, represents the introduction of economic inductance, and
constitutes
notes of indebtedness. War is therefore the balancing of the system by
killing
the true creditors (the public which we have taught to exchange true
value for
inflated currency) and falling back on whatever is left of the resources
of
nature and the regeneration of those resources.
Mr. Rothschild had discovered that currency gave him the power to
rearrange the
economic structure to his own advantage,, to shift economic inductance to
those
economic positions which would encourage the greatest economic
instability and
oscillation.
The final key to economic control had to wait until there was sufficient
data
and high speed computing equipment to keep close watch on the economic
oscillations created by price shocking and excess paper energy credits --
(paper
inductance/inflation).
BREAKTHROUGH
The aviation field provided the greatest evolution in economic
engineering by
way of the mathematical theory of shock testing. In this process, a
projectile
is fired from an airframe on the ground and the impulse of the recoil is
monitored by vibration transducers connected to the airframe and wired to
chart
recorders. By studying the echoes or reflections of the recoil impulse in
the
airframe, it is possible to discover critical vibrations in the structure
of the
airframe which either vibrations of the negine or aeolian vibrations of
the
wings, or a combination of the two, might reinforce resulting in a
reconant selfdestruction
of the airframe in flight as an aircraft. From the standpoint of
engineering,
this means that the strengths and weaknesses of the structure of the
airframe in
terms of vibrational energy can be discovered and manipulated.
APPLICATION IN ECONOMICS
To use this method of airframe shock testing in economic engineering, the
prices
of commodities are shocked, and the public consumer reaction is
monitored. The
resulting echoes of the economic shock are interpreted theoretically by
computers and the psycho-economic structure of the economy is thus
discovered.
It is by this process that partial differential and difference matricos
are
discovered that define the family household and make possible its
evolution as
an economic industry (dissipative consumer structure). Then the response
of the
household to future shocks can be predicted and manipulated, and society
becomes
a well regulated animal with its reins under the control of a
sophisticated
computer-regulated social energy bookkeeping system.
Eventually every individual element of the structure comes under computer
control through a knowledge of personal preferences, such knowledge
guaranteed
by computer association of consumer preferences (universal product code
-- UPC --
zebra stripe pricing codes on packages) with identified consumers
(identified
via association with the use of a credit card and later a permanent
'tattooed'
body number invisible under normal ambient illumination.
SUMMARY
Economics is only a social extension of a natural energy system. It,
also, has
its three passive components. Because of the distribution of wealth and
the lack
of communication and consequent lack of data, this field has been the
last
energy field for which a knowledge of these three passive components has
been
developed.
Since energy is the key to all activity on the face of the earth, it
follows
that in order to attain a monopoly of energy, raw materials, goods, and
services
and to establish a world system of slave labor, it is necessary to have a
first
strike capability in the field of economics. In order to maintain our
position,
it is necessary that we have absolute first knowledge of the science of
control
over all economic factors and the first experience at engineering the
world
economy.
In order to achieve such sovereignty, we must at least achieve this one
end:
that the public will not make either the logical or mathematical
connection
between economics and the other energy sciences or learn to apply such
knowledge.
This is becoming increasingly difficult to control because more and more
businesses are making demands upon their computer programmers to create
and
apply mathematical models for the management of those businesses.
It is only a matter of time before the new breed of private
programmer/economists
will catch on to the far reaching implications of the work begun at
Harvard in
1948. The speed with which they can communicate their warning to the
public will
largely depend upon how effective we have been at controlling the media,
subverting education, and keeping the public distracted with matters of
no real
importance.
THE ECONOMIC MODEL
Economics, as a social energy science has as a first objective the
description
of the complex way in which any given unit of resources is used to
satisfy some
economic want. (Leontief Matrix) The first objective, when it is extended
to get
the most product from the least or limited resources, comprises that
objective
of general military) and industrial logistics known as Operations
Research. (See
simplex method of linear programming.)
The Harvard Economic Research Project (1948-) was an extension of World
War II
Operations Research. Its purpose was to discover the science of
controlling an
economy; at first the American economy, and then the world economy. It
was felt
that with sufficient mathematical foundation and data, it would be nearly
as
easy to predict and control the trend of an economy as to predict and
control
the trajectory of a projectile. Such as proven to be the case. Moreover,
the
economy has been transformed into a guided missile on target.
The immediate aim of the Harvard project was to discover the economic
structure,
what forces change that structure, how the behavior of the structure can
be
predicted, and how it can be manipulated. What was needed was a well
organized
knowledge of the mathematical structures and interrelationships of
investment,
production, distribution, and consumption. To make a short story of it
all, it
was discovered than an economy obeyed the same, laws as electricity and
that all
of the mathematical theory and practical and computer know-how developed
for the
electronic field could be directly applied in the study of economics.
This
discovery was not openly declared, and its more subtle implications were
and are
kept a closely guarded secret, for example that in an economic model,
human life
is measured in dollars, and that the electric spark generated when
opening a
switch connected to an active inductor in mathematically analogous to the
initiation of a war.
The greatest hurdle which theoretical economists faced was the accurate
description of the household as an industry. This is a challenge, because
consumer purchases are a matter of choice which in turn is influenced by
income,
price, and other economic factors.
This hurdle was cleared in an indirect and statistically approximate way
by an
application of shock testing to determine the current characteristics,
called
current technical coefficients, of a household industry. Why GAS Costs
$2.00 Per
Gallon
Finally, because problems in theoretical economics can be translated very
easily
into problems in theoretical electronics, and the solution translated
back again,
it follows that only a book of language translation and concept
definition
needed to be written for economics. The remainder could be gotten from
standard
works on mathematics and electronics. This makes the publication of books
on
advanced economics unnecessary, and greatly simplifies project security.
INDUSTRIAL DIAGRAMS
An ideal industry is defined as a device which receives value from other
industries in several forms and converts it into one specific product for
sales
and distribution to other industries. It has several inputs and one
output. What
the public normally thinks of as one industry is really an industrial
complex
where several industries under one roof produce one or more products.
The flow of product from industry #1 (supply) to industry #2 (demand) is
denoted
by 112. The total flow out of industry 'K' is denoted by I k . (sales,
etc.)
A node is a symbol of collection and distribution of flow. Node #3
receives from
industry #3 and distributes to industries #1 through #3. If industry #3
manufactures chairs, then a flow from Industry #3 back to industry #3
simply
indicates that industry #3 is using part of its own output product, for
example,
as office furniture. Therefore, the flow may be summarized by the
equations:
THREE INDUSTRIAL CLASSES
Industries fell into three categories or class by type of output.
Class #1 - Capital (resources)
Class #2 - Goods (commodities or use - dissipative)
Class #3 - Services (action of population)
Class # 1 Industries exist at three levels
(1) Nature - sources of energy and raw materials.
(2) Government - printing of currency equal to gross national product
(GNP), and
extension of currency in excess of GNP.
(3) Banking - loaning of money for interest, and extension
(counterfeiting) of
economic value through deposit loan account - inflation.
Class # 2 industries exist as producers of tangible or consumer
(dissipated)
products. This sort of activity is usually recognized and labeled by the
public
as an 'industry'.
Class # 3 industries are those which have service rather than a tangible
product
as their output. These industries are called (1) households, and (2)
governments.
Their output is human activity of a mechanical sort, and their basis is
population.
AGGREGATION
The whole economic system can be represented by a three industry model if
one
allows the names of the outputs to be (1) capital, (2) goods, and (3)
services.
The problem with this representation is that it would not show the
influence of,
say, the textile industry on the ferrous metal industry. This is because
both
the textile industry and the ferrous metal industry would be contained
within a
single classification called the 'goods industry' and by this process of
combining or aggregating these two industries under one system block they
would
lose their economic individuality.
THE E-MODEL
A national economy consists of simultaneous flows of production,
distribution,
consumption, and investment. If all of these elements including labor and
human
functions are assigned a numerical value in like units of measure, say,
1939
dollars, on this flow can be further represented by a current flow in an
electronic circuit, and its behavior can be predicted and manipulated
with
useful precision.
The three ideal passive energy components of electronics, the capacitor,
the
resistor, and the inductor correspond to the three ideal passive energy
components of economics called the pure industries of capital, goods, and
services, resp..
Economic capacitance represents the storage of capital in one form or
another.
Economic conductance represents the level of conductance of materials for
the
production of goods.
Economic inductance represents the inertia of economic value in motion.
This is
a population phenomenon known as services.
ECONOMIC INDUCTANCE
An electrical inductor (e.g., a coil of wire) has an electric current as
its
primary phenomenon and a magnetic field as its secondary phenomenon
(inertia).
Corresponding to this, an economic inductor has a flow of economic value
as its
primary phenomenon and a population field as its secondary phenomenon of
inertia.
When the flow of economic value (e.g., money) diminishes, the human
population
field collapses in order to keep the economic value (money) flowing
(extreme
case - war).
The public inertia is a result of consumer buying habits, expected
standard of
living, etc., and is generally a phenomenon of self-preservation.
INDUCTIVE FACTORS TO CONSIDER
(1) Population
(2) magnitude of the economic activities of the government.
(3) the method of financing these government activities (see Peter-Paul
Principle-inflation of the currency)
TRANSLATION
(A few examples will be given.)
CHARGE -- coulombs
-- dollars (1939).
FLOW/CURRENT -- amperes (coulombs per second)
-- dollars of flow per year.
MOTIVATING FORCE -- volts -- dollars (output) demand.
CONDUCTANCE -- amperes per volt.
-- dollars of flow per year per dollar demand.
CAPITANCE -- coulombs per volt.
-- dollars of production inventory/stock per dollar demand.
TIME-FLOW RELATIONSHIPS AND SELF-DESTRUCTIVE OSCILLATIONS
An ideal industry may be symbolized electronically in various ways. The
simplest
way is to represent a demand by a voltage and a supply by a current. When
this
is done, the relationship between the two becomes what is called an
admittance,
which can result from three economic factors: (1) hindsight flow, 2)
present
flow, and (3) foresight flow.
Foresight flow is the result of that property of living entities to cause
energy
(food) to be stored for a period of low energy (e.g., a winter season).
It
consists of demands made upon an economic system for that period of low
energy
(winter
season). In a production industry it takes several forms, one of which is
known
as production stock or inventory. In electronic symbology this specific
industry
demand (a pure capital industry) is represented by capacitance and the
stock or
resource is represented by a stored charge. Satisfaction of an industry
demand
suffers a lag because of the loading effect of inventory priorities.
Present flow ideally involves no delays. It is, so to speak, input today
for
output today, a 'hand to mouth' flow. In electronic symbology, this
specific
industry demand (a pure use industry) is represented by a conductance
which is
then a simple economic valve (a dissipative element).
Hindsight flow is known as habit or inertia. In electronics, this
phenomenon is
the characteristic of an inductor (economic analog = a pure service
industry) in
which a current flow (economic analog = flow of money) creates a magnetic
field
(economic analog = active human population) which, if the current (money
flow)
begins to diminish, collapses (war) to maintain the current (flow of
money --
energy).
Other large alternatives to war as economic inductors or economic
flywheels are
an open-ended social welfare program, or enormous (but fruitful)
open-ended
space program.
The problem with stabilizing the economic system is that there is too
much
demand on account of (1) too much greed and (2) too much population.
This creates excessive economic inductance which can only be balanced
with
economic capacitance (true resources or value - e.g. in goods or
services). The
social welfare program is nothing more than an open-ended credit balance
system
which creates a false capital industry to give non-productive people a
roof over
their heads and food in their stomachs. This can be useful, however,
because the
recipients become state property, in return for the 'gift' , a standing
array
for the elite. For he who pays the piper, picks the tune. Those who get
hooked
on the economic drug, must go to the elite for a fix. In this, the method
of
introducing large amounts of stabilizing capacitance is by borrowing on
the
future 'credit' of the world. This is a fourth law of motion -- onset,
and
consists of performing an action and leaving the system before the
reflected
reaction returns to the point of action -- a delayed reaction. The means
of
surviving the reaction is by changing the system before the reaction can
return.
By this means, politicians become popular in their own time and the
public pays
for it later. In fact the measure of such a politician is the delay time.
The
same thing is achieved by a government by printing money beyond the limit
of the
gross national product, an economic process called inflation. This puts a
large
quantity of money into the hands of the public and maintains a balance
against
their greed, creates a false self-confidence in them and, for a while,
stays the
wolf from the door.
They must eventually resort to war to balance the account, because war
ultimately is merely the act to keep the responsibility and blood off the
public
conscience. (See section on consent factors and social-economic
structuring.)
If the people really cared about their fellow man, they would control
their
appetites (greed, procreation, etc.) so that they would not have to
operate on a
credit or welfare social system which steals from this worker to satisfy
the bum.
Since most of the general public will not exercise restraint, there are
only two
alternatives to reduce the economic inductance of the system.
(1) Let the populace bludgeon each other to death in war, which will only
result
in a total destruction of the living earth.
(2) Take control of the world by the use of economic 'silent weapons' in
a form
of 'quiet warfare', and reduce the economic inductance of the world to a
safe
level by a process of benevolent slavery and genocide.
The latter option has been taken as the obviously better option. At this
point
it should be crystal clear to the reader why absolute secrecy about the
silent
weapons is necessary. The general public refuses to improve its own
mentality
and its faith in its fellow man. It has become a herd of proliferating
barbarians, and, so' to speak, a blight upon the fate of the earth. They
do not
care enough about economic science to learn why they have not been able
to avoid
war despite religious morality, and their religious or self-gratifying
refusal
to deal with earthly problems renders the solution of the earthly problem
unreachable by them. It is left to those few who are truly willing to
think and
survive as the fittest to survive, to solve the problem for themselves as
the
few who really care. Otherwise, exposure of the silent weapon would
destroy our
only hope of preserving the seed of future true humanity.
THE HOUSEHOLD INDUSTRY
The industries of finance (banking), manufacturing, and government, real
counterparts of the pure industries of capital, goods, and services, are
easily
defined because they are generally logically structured. Because of this
their
processes can be described mathematically and their technical
coefficients can
be easily deduced. This, however, is not the case with the service
industry
known as the household industry.
HOUSEHOLD MODELS
When the industry flow diagram is represented by a 2-block system of
households
on the right and all other industries on the left, the following results.
(labor, etc.)
The arrows from left to right labeled A, B, C, etc., denote flow of
economic
value from the industries in the left hand block to the industry in the
right
hand block called 'households'. These may be thought of as the monthly
consumer
flows of the following commodities. A - alcoholic beverages, B - beef, C
-
coffee, ..., U - unknown, etc..
The problem which a theoretical economist faces is that the consumer
preferences
of any household is not easily predictable and the technical coefficients
of any
one household tend to be a non-linear, very complex, and variable
function
income, prices, etc.
Computer information derived from the use of the universal product code
in
conjunction with credit card purchase as an individual household
identifier
could change this state of affairs. But the U.P.C. method is not yet
available
on a national or even a significant regional scale. To compensate for
this data
deficiency, an alternate indirect approach of analysis has been adopted
known as
economic shock testing. This method, widely used in the aircraft
manufacturing
industry develops an aggregate statistical sort of data.
Applied to economics, this means that all of the households in one region
or in
the whole nation are studied as a group or class rather than
individually, and
the mass behavior rather than individual behavior is used to discover
useful
estimates of the technical coefficients governing the economic structure
of the
hypothetical single household industry.
Notice in the industry flow diagram that the values for the flows A,B,C,
etc.,
are accessible to measurement in terms of selling prices and total sales
of
commodities.
One method of evaluating the technical coefficients of the household
industry
depends upon shocking the prices of a commodity and noting the changes in
the
sales of all of the commodities.
ECONOMIC SHOCK TESTING
In recent times, the application of Operations Research to the study of
the
public economy has been obvious for anyone who understands the principles
of
shock testing.
In the shock testing of an aircraft airframe, the recoil impulse of
firing a gun
mounted on that airframe causes shock waves in that structure which tell
aviation engineers the conditions under which parts of the airplane or
the whole
airplane or its wings will start to vibrate or flutter like a guitar
string, a
flute reed, or a tuning fork, and disintegrate or fall apart in flight.
Economic engineers achieve the same result in studying the behavior of
the
economy and the consumer public by carefully selecting a staple commodity
such
as beef, coffee, gasoline, or sugar and then causing a sudden change or
shock in
its price or availability, thus kicking everybody's budget and buying
habits out
of shape.
They then observe the shock waves which result by monitoring the changes
in
advertising, prices, and sales of that and other commodities.
The objective of such studies is to acquire know-how to set the public
economy
into a predictable state of motion or change, even a controlled
self-destructive
state of motion which will convince the public that certain "expert"
people
should take control of the money system and reestablish security (rather
than
liberty and justice) for all. When the subject citizens are rendered
unable to
control their financial affairs, they of course, become totally enslaved,
a
source of cheap labor.
Not only the prices of commodities, but also the availability of labor
can be
used as the means of shock testing. Labor strikes deliver excellent test
shocks
to an economy, especially in the critical service areas of trucking
(transportation),
communication, public utilities (energy, water, garbage collection), etc.
By shock testing, it is found that there is a direct relationship between
the
availability of money flowing in an economy and the psychological outlook
and
response of masses of people dependent upon that availability.
For example, there is a measurable, quantitative relationship between the
price
of gasoline, and the probability that a person would experience a
headache, feel
a need to watch a violent movie, smoke a cigarette, or go to a tavern for
a mug
of beer.
It is most interesting that, by observing and measuring the economic
modes by
which the public tries to run from their problems and escape from
reality, and
by applying the mathematical theory of Operations Research, it is
possible to
program computers to predict the most probable combination of created
events
(shocks)
which will bring about a complete control and subjugation of the public
through
a subversion of the public economy (by shaking the plum tree).
INTRODUCTION TO THE THEORY OF ECONOMIC SHOCK TESTING
Let the prices and total sales of commodities be given and symbolized as
follows.
Let us assume a simple economic model in which the total number of
important
(staple)
commodities are represented as beef, gasoline, and an aggregate of all
other
staple commodities which we will call the hypothetical miscellaneous
staple
commodity 'M'. (e.g., M is an aggregate of C, S, T, U, etc..)
INTRODUCTION TO ECONOMIC AMPLIFIERS
Economic amplifiers are the active components of economic engineering.
The basic
characteristic of any amplifier, (mechanical, electrical, or economic) is
that
it receives an input control signal and delivers energy from an
independent
energy, source to a specified output terminal in a predictable
relationship to
that input control signal.
The simplest form of economic amplifier is a device called advertising.
If a person is spoken to by a T.V. advertiser as if he were a twelve year
old,
then, due to suggestibility, he will, with a certain probability, respond
or
react to that suggestion with the uncritical response of a twelve year
old and
will reach into his economic reservoir and deliver its energy to buy that
product on impulse when he passes it in the store.
An economic amplifier may have several inputs and outputs. Its response
might be
instantaneous or delayed. Its circuit symbol might be a rotary switch if
its
options are exclusive, qualitative, 'go' or 'no go', or it might have its
parametric input/output relationships specified by a matrix with internal
energy
sources represented.
Whatever its form might be, its purpose is to govern the flow of energy
from a
source to an output sink in direct relationship to an input control
signal. For
this reason, it is called an active circuit element or component.
Economic Amplifiers fall into classes called strategies, and in
comparison with
electronic amplifiers, the specific internal functions or an economic
amplifier
are called logistical instead of electrical.
Therefore, economic amplifiers not only deliver power gain, but also, in
effect,
are used to cause changes in the economic circuitry.
In the design of an economic amplifier we must have some idea of at least
five
functions, which are:
(1) the available input signals,
(2) the desired output control objectives,
(3) the strategic objective,
(4) the available economic power sources,
(5) the logistical options.
The process of defining and evaluating these factors and incorporating
the
economic amplifier into an economic system has been popularly called game
theory.
The design of an economic amplifier begins with a specification of the
power
level of the output, which can range from personal to national. The
second
condition is accuracy of response, i.e., how accurately the output action
is a
function of the input commands. High gain combined with strong feedback
helps to
deliver the required precision. Most of the error will be in the input
data
signal. Personal input data tends to be specific, while national input
data
tends to be statistical.
SHORT LIST OF INPUTS
Questions to be answered:
(1) what (3) where (5) why
(2) when (4) how (6) who
General sources of information:
(1) telephone taps (3) analysis of garbage
(2) surveillance (4) behavior of children in school
Standard of living by:
(1) food (3) shelter
(2) clothing (4) transportation
Social contacts:
(1) telephone - itemized record of calls
(2) family - marriage certificate, birth certificates, etc.
(3) friends, associates, etc.
(4) memberships in organizations
(5) political affiliation
THE PERSONAL PAPER TRAIL
Personal buying habits, i.e.,
Personal consumer preferences:
(1) checking accounts
(2) credit card purchases
(3) ' tagged' credit card purchases - the credit card purchase of
products
bearing the U.P.C. (Universal Product Code)
Assets:
(1) checking accounts (5) automobile, etc.
(2) savings accounts (6) safety deposit at bank
(3) real estate (7) stock market
(4) business
Liabilities:
(1) creditors (3) loans
(2) enemies (see legal) (4) consumer credit
Government sources (ploys)*:
(1) Welfare (4) doles
(2) Social Security (5) grants
(3) U.S.D.A. surplus food (6) subsidies
Government sources (via intimidation)
(1) Internal Revenue Service
(2) OSHA
(3) Census
(4) etc.
* Principle of this ploy -- the citizen will almost always make the
collection
of information easy if he can operate on the 'free sandwich principle' of
'eat
now, and pay later'.
Other Government sources -- surveillance of U.S. Mail.
HABIT PATTERNS -- PROGRAMMING
Strengths and weaknesses:
(1) activities (sports, hobbies, etc.)
(2) see 'legal' (fear, anger, etc. - crime record)
(3) hospital records (drug sensitivities, reaction to pain, etc.)
(4) psychiatric records (fears, angers, disgusts, adaptability, reactions
to
stimuli, violence, suggestibility or hypnosis, pain, pleasure, love and
sex)
Methods of coping -- adaptability -- behavior:
(1) consumption of alcohol
(2) consumption of drugs
(3) entertainment
(4) religious factors influencing behavior
(5) other methods of escaping from reality.
Payment modus operandi (MO) -- pay on time, etc.:
(1) payment of telephone bills
(2) energy purchases (electric, gas...)
(3) water purchases
(4) repayment of loans
(5) house payments
(6) automobile payments
(7) payments on credit cards
Political sensitivity:
(1) beliefs (3) position (5) projects/activities
(2) contacts (4) strengths/weaknesses
Legal inputs - behavior control
(Excuses for investigation, search, arrest, or employment of force to
modify
behavior.)
(1) court reports (4) reports made to police
(2) police records - NCIC (5) insurance information
(3) driving record (6) anti-establishment acquaintances
NATIONAL INPUT INFORMATION
Business sources (via I.R.S., etc.):
(1) prices of commodities
(2) sales
(3) investments in
(a) stocks/inventory
(b) production tools and machinery
(c) buildings and improvements
(d) the stock market
Banks and credit bureaus:
(1) credit information
(2) payment information
Miscellaneous Sources:
(1) polls and surveys
(2) publications
(3) telephone records
(4) energy and utility purchases
SHORT LIST OF OUT PUTS
Outputs - create controlled situations
- manipulation of the economy. hence society
- control by control of compensation and losses.
Sequence:
(1) allocates opportunities.
(2) destroys opportunities.
(3) controls the economic industry.
(4) controls the availability of raw materials
(5) controls capital.
(6) controls bank rates.
(7) controls the inflation of the currency.
(8) controls the possession of property.
(9) controls the industrial capacity.
(10) controls manufacturing.
(11) controls the availability of goods (commodities).
(12) controls the prices of commodities.
(13) controls services, the labor force, etc.
(14) controls payments to government officials.
(15) controls the legal functions
(16) controls the personal data file uncorrectable - by the party
slandered.
(17) controls advertising.
(18) controls media content.
(19) controls material available for T.V. viewing.
(20) disengages attention from real issues.
(21) engages emotions.
(22) creates disorder, chaos, and insanity.
(23) controls design of more probing tax forms.
(24) controls surveillance.
(25) controls the storage of information.
(26) develops psychological analyses and profiles of individuals.
(27) controls legal functions (repeat of 15).
(28) controls sociological factors.
(29) controls health options.
(30) preys on weaknesses.
(31) cripples strengths.
(32) leaches wealth and substance.
DIVERSION, THE PRIMARY STRATEGY
Experience has proven that the simplest method of securing a silent
weapon and
gaining control of the public is to keep the public undisciplined and
ignorant
of basic systems principles on the one hand, while keeping them confused,
disorganized, and distracted with matters of no real importance on the
other
hand.
This is achieved by:
(1) Disengaging their minds, sabotaging their mental activities, by
providing a
low quality program of public education in mathematics, logic, systems
design,
and economics, and by discouraging technical creativity.
(2) Engaging their emotions, increasing their self-indulgence and their
indulgence in emotional and physical activities, by:
(a) unrelenting emotional affrontations and attacks (mental and emotional
rape)
by way of a constant barrage of sex, violence, and wars in the media -
especially the T.V. and the newspapers.
(b) giving them what they desire - in excess - "junk food for thought"
and
depriving them of what they really need.
(3) Rewriting history and law and subjecting the public to the deviant
creation,
thus being able to shift their thinking from personal needs to highly
fabricated
outside priorities.
These preclude their interest in and discovery of the silent weapons of
social
automation technology.
The general rule is that there is profit in confusion; the more
confusion, the
more profit. Therefore, the best approach is to create problems and then
offer
the solutions.
DIVERSION SUMMARY
MEDIA: Keep the adult public attention diverted away from the real social
issues,
and captivated by matters of no real importance.
SCHOOLS: Keep the young public ignorant of real mathematics, real
economics,
real law, and real history.
ENTERTAINMENT: Keep the public entertainment below a sixth grade level.
WORK: Keep the public busy, busy, busy, with no time to think; back on
the farm
with the other animals.
CONSENT, THE PRIMARY VICTORY
A silent weapon system operates upon data obtained from a docile public
by legal
(but not always lawful) force. Much information is made available to
silent
weapon systems programmers through the Internal Revenue Service . (See
"Studies
In The Structure Of The American Economy" for an I.R.S. source list.)
This
information consists of the enforced delivery of well organized data
contained
in federal and state tax forms collected, assembled, and submitted by
slave
labor provided by taxpayers and employers. Furthermore, the number of
such forms
submitted to the I.R.S. is a useful indicator of public consent, an
important
factor in strategic decision making. Other data sources are given in the
"Short
List Of Inputs.
Consent Coefficients: numerical feedback indicating victory status.
Psychological basis:
When the government is able to collect tax and seize private property
without
just compensation, it is an indication that the public is ripe for
surrender and
is consenting to enslavement and legal encroachment. A good and easily
quantified indicator of harvest time is the number of public citizens who
pay
income tax.
AMPLIFICATION ENERGY SOURCES
The next step in the process of designing as economic amplifier is
discovering
the energy sources. The energy sources which support any primitive
economic
system are, of course, a supply of raw materials, and the consent of the
people
to labor and consequently assume a certain rank, position, level, or
class in
the social structure; i.e., to provide labor at various levels in the
pecking
order.
Each class, in guaranteeing its own level of income, controls the class
immediately below it, hence preserves the class structure. This provides
stability and security, but also government from the top.
As time goes on and communication and education improve, the lower class
elements of the social labor structure become knowledgeable and envious
of the
good things that the upper class members have. They also begin to attain
a
knowledge of energy systems and the ability to enforce their rise through
the
class structure.
This threatens the sovereignty of the elite.
If this rise of the lower classes can be postponed long enough, the elite
can
achieve energy dominance, and labor by consent no longer will hold a
position of
an essential economic energy source.
Until such energy dominance is absolutely established, the consent of
people to
labor and let others handle their affairs must be taken into
consideration,
since failure to do so could cause the people to interfere in the final
transfer
of energy sources to the control of the elite.
It is essential to recognize that at this time, public consent is still
an
essential key to the release of energy in the process of economic
amplification.
Therefore, consent as an energy release mechanism will now be considered.
LOGISTICS
The successful application of a strategy requires a careful study of
inputs,
outputs, the strategy connecting the inputs and the outputs, and the
available
energy sources to fuel the strategy. This study is called logistics.
A logistical problem is studied at the elementary level first, and then
levels
of greater complexity are studied as a synthesis of elementary factors.
This means that a given system is analyzed, i.e., broken down into its
sub-systems,
and these in turn are analyzed, until, by this process, one arrives at
the
logistical 'atom', the individual.
This is where the process of syntheses properly begins, at the time of
the birth
of the individual.
THE ARTIFICIAL WOMB
From the time a person leaves its mother's womb, its every effort is
directed
toward building, maintaining, and withdrawing into artificial wombs,
various
sorts of substitute protective devices or shells.
The objective of these artificial wombs is to provide a stable
environment for
both stable and unstable activity; to provide a shelter for the
evolutionary
processes of growth, and maturity - i.e., survival; to provide security
for
freedom and to provide defensive protection for offensive activity.
THE POLITICAL STRUCTURE OF A NATION - DEPENDENCY
The primary reason why the individual citizens of a country create a
political
structure is a subconscious wish or desire to perpetuate their own
dependency
relationship of childhood.
Simply put, they want a human god to eliminate all risk from their life,
pat
them on the head, kiss their bruises, put a chicken on every dinner
table,
clothe their bodies, tuck them into bed at night, and tell them that
everything
will be alright when they wake up in the morning.
This public demand is incredible, so the human god, the political, meets
incredibility with incredibility by promising the world and delivering
nothing.
So who is the bigger liar?, the public?, or the 'godfather'?
This public behavior is surrender born of fear, laziness and expediency.
It is
the basis of the welfare state as a strategic weapon, useful against a
disgusting public.
ACTION/OFFENSE
Most people want to be able to subdue and/or kill other human beings
which
disturb their daily lives, but they do not want to have to cope with the
moral
and religious issues which such an overt act on their part might raise.
Therefore, they assign the dirty work to others (including their own
children)
so as to keep the blood off their own hands. They rave about the humane
treatment of animals and then sit down to a delicious hamburger from a
whitewashed slaughterhouse down the street and out of sight. But even
more
hypocritical, they pay taxes to finance a professional association of hit
men
collectively called politicians, and then complain about corruption in
government.
RESPONSIBILITY
Again, most people want to be free to do things (to explore, etc.) but
they are
afraid to fail.
The fear of failure is manifested in irresponsibility, and especially in
delegating those personal responsibilities to others where success is
uncertain
or carries possible or created liabilities (law) which the person is not
prepared to accept.
They want authority (root word - 'author'), but they will not accept
responsibility or liability. They hire politicians to face reality for
them.
SUMMARY
The people hire the politicians so that the people can:
(1) obtain security without managing it.
(2) obtain action without thinking about it.
(3) inflict theft, injury, and death upon others without having to
contemplate
either life or death.
(4) avoid responsibility for their own intentions.
(5) obtain the benefits of reality and science without exerting
themselves in
the discipline of facing or learning either of these things.
They give the politicians the power to create and manage a war machine
to:
(1) provide for the survival of the NATION/WOMB.
(2) prevent encroachment of anything of anything upon the NATION/WOMB.
(3) destroy the enemy who threatens the NATION/WOMB.
(4) destroy those citizens of their own country who do not conform for
the sake
of stability of the NATION/WOMB.
Politicians hold many quasi-military jobs, the lowest being the police
which are
soldiers, the attorneys and the C.P.A.s next who are spies and saboteurs
(licensed),
and the judges who shout the orders and run the closed union military
shop for
whatever the market will bear. The generals are industrialists. The
'presidential'
level of commander-in-chief is shared by the international bankers. The
people
know that they have created this farce and financed it with their own
taxes
(consent),
but they would rather knuckle under than be the hypocrite.
Thus, a nation becomes divided into two very distinct parts, a DOCILE
SUB-NATION
and a POLITICAL SUB-NATION. The political sub-nation remains attached to
the
docile sub-nation, tolerates it, and leaches its substance until it grows
strong
enough to detach itself and devour its parent.
SYSTEM ANALYSIS
In order to make meaningful computerized economic decisions about war,
the
primary economic flywheel, it is necessary to assign concrete logistical
values
to each element of the war structure -- personnel and material alike.
This process begins with a clear and candid description of the
sub-systems of
such a structure.
THE DRAFT (As military service)
Few efforts of human behavior modification are more remarkable or more
effective
than that of the socio-military institution known as the draft. A primary
purpose of a draft or other such institution is to instill, by
intimidation, in
the young males of a society the uncritical conviction that the
government is
omnipotent. He is soon taught that a prayer is slow to reverse what a
bullet can
do in an instant. Thus, a man trained in a religious environment for
eighteen
years of his life can, by this instrument of the government, be broken
down, be
purged of his fantasies and delusions in a matter of mere months. Once
that
conviction is instilled, all else becomes easy to instill.
Even more interesting is the process by which a young man's parents, who
purportedly love him, can be induced to send him off to war to his death.
Although the scope of this work will not allow this matter to be expanded
in
full detail, nevertheless, a course overview will be possible and can
serve to
reveal those factors which must be included in some numerical form in a
computer
analysis of social and war systems.
We begin with a tentative definition of the draft.
The draft: (selective service, etc.) is an institution of compulsory
collective
sacrifice and slavery, devised by the middle aged and the elderly for the
purpose of pressing the young into doing the public dirty work. It
further
serves to make the youth as guilty as the elders, thus making criticism
of the
elders by the youth less likely (Generational Stabilizer). It is marketed
and
sold to the public under the label of "patriotic - national" service.
Once a candid economic definition of the draft is achieved, that
definition is
used to outline the boundaries of a structure called a Human Value
System, which
in turn is translated into the terms of game theory. The value of such a
slave
laborer is given in a Table of Human Values, a table broken down into
categories
by intellect, experience, post service job demand, etc..
Some of these categories are ordinary and can be tentatively evaluated in
terms
of the value of certain jobs for which a known fee exists. Some jobs are
harder
to value because they are unique to the demands of social subversion, for
an
extreme example: the value of a mother's instruction to her daughter
causing
that daughter to put certain behavioral demands upon a future husband,
ten or
fifteen years hence, thus, by suppressing his resistance to a perversion
of a
government, making it easier for a banking cartel to buy the State of New
York
in, say, twenty years.
Such a problem leans heavily upon the observations and the data of
wartime
espionage and many types of psychological testing. But crude mathematical
models
(algorithms, etc.) can be devised, if not to predict, at least to
predetermine
theme events with maximum certainty. What does not exist by natural
cooperation
is thus enhanced by calculated compulsion. Human beings are machines,
levers
which may be grasped and turned, and there is little real difference
between
automating a society and automating a shoe factory.
These derived values are variable. (It is necessary to use a current
Table of
Human Values for computer analysis.) These values are given in true
measure
rather than U.S. dollars, since the latter is unstable, being presently
inflated
beyond the production of national goods and services so as to give the
economy a
false kinetic energy ('paper' inductance).
The silver value is stable, it being possible to buy the same amount with
a gram
of silver today as could be bought in 1920. Human value measured in
silver units
changes slightly due to changes in production technology.
ENFORCEMENT
FACTOR I
As in every social system approach, stability is achieved only by
understanding
and accounting for human nature (action/reaction patterns). A failure to
do so
can be, and usually is, disastrous. As in other human social schemes, one
for or
another of intimidation (or incentive) is essential to the success of the
draft.
Physical principles of action and reaction must be applied to both
internal and
external sub-systems. To secure the draft, individual
brainwashing/programming
and both the family unit and the peer group must be engaged and brought
under
control.
FACTOR II FATHER
The man of the household must be house-broken to ensure that junior will
grow up
with the right social training and attitudes. The advertising media,
etc., are
engaged to see to it that father-to-be is pussy-whipped before or by the
time he
is married. He is taught that he either conforms to the social notch out
for him
or his sex life will be hobbled and his tender companionship will be
zero. He is
made to see that women demand security more than logical, principled, or
honorable behavior. By the time his son must go to war, father (with
jelly for a
back bone) will slam a gun into junior's hand before father will risk the
censure of his peers, or make a hypocrite of himself by crossing the
investment
he has in his own personal opinion or self-esteem. Junior will go to war
or
father will be embarrassed. So junior will go to war, the true purpose of
the
war notwithstanding.
FACTOR III MOTHER
The female element of human society is ruled by emotion first and logic
second.
In the battle between logic and imagination, imagination always wins,
fantasy
prevails, maternal instinct dominates so that the child comes first and
the
future comes second. A woman with a newborn baby is too starry-eyed to
see a
wealthy man's cannon fodder or a cheap source of slave labor. A woman
must,
however, be conditioned to accept the transition to "reality" when it
comes, or
sooner.
As the transition becomes more difficult to manage, the family unit must
be
carefully disintegrated, and state controlled public education and state
operated child care centers must become more common and legally enforced
so as
to begin the detachment of the child from the mother and the father at an
earlier age. Inoculation of behavioral drugs can speed the transition for
the
child (mandatory). CAUTION: A woman's impulsive anger can override her
fear. An
irate woman's power must never be underestimated, and her power over a
pussywhipped
husband must likewise never be underestimated. It got women the vote in
1920.
FACTOR IV JUNIOR
The emotional pressure for self-preservation during time of war and the
self-serving
attitude of the common herd that have an option to avoid the battlefield
-- if
junior can be persuaded to go -- is all of the pressure finally necessary
to
propel Johnny off to war. Their quiet black mailings of him are the
threats: "No
sacrifice, no friends; no glory, no girlfriends."
FACTOR V SISTER
And what about junior's sister? She is given all the good things of life
by her
father, and taught to expect the same from her future husband regardless
of the
price.
FACTOR VI CATTLE
Those who will not use their brains are not better off than those who
have no
brains, and so this mindless school of jellyfish, father, mother, son,
and
daughter, become useful beasts of burden or trainers of the same.
This concludes what is available (and what was found) of this government
document.

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113528 ]

Do, 18 August 2005 13:38

Dan C

On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:11:30 +0100, Michael O'Neill wrote:

> I am unable to prove or deny the provenance of this document, posted

Keep your off-topic bullshit to yourself, you ignorant little moron.

--
If you're not on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
Linux Registered User #327951

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113532 ]

Do, 18 August 2005 16:02

Morgil

Michael O'Neill wrote:

"Navel Intelligence"

Always a reliable source of information.

Morgil

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113535 ]

Do, 18 August 2005 18:22

sbjensen

Quoth Michael O'Neill <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> in article
<43046CE2.3912A9DC [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie>:
> I am unable to prove or deny the provenance of this document, posted
> recently to alt.binaries.e-books.flood, therefore the comments herein
> must be taken with a large grain of salt.
....
> This post may shed some light on some of the myths by which men sleep.

Tell me, have you actually _read_ this document? Or any substantial
part of it? Not only are its claims pretty silly to begin with, but
the whole thing looks like it's deliberately written to generate
maximum outrage in the maximum number of people. (It even throws in
the old "invisible tracking numbers under the skin" bit so that
fundamentalist Christians will get upset, too.) People who thought
this way simply wouldn't write this way.

The notion stated here that economics can be mapped directly onto
Newton's laws or electronic circuits in any meaningful way is simply
absurd. Physicists have been thinking about how their models might
apply to economics for _decades_, and publicly so, not just in some
back room conspiracy. They've had some successes (as can be seen from
the popularity of physics PhDs on Wall Street), but certainly nothing
remotely close to the economic mind control that this article claims
would have been easy to figure out long ago. For what it's worth, the
models that have been successful are almost nothing like the freshman
physics babble described here.

So, yeah. Some conspiracy theories might actually be true, but the
vast majority are certainly rubbish. I suggest that in the future,
you take a bit more care to distinguish between the two. (Skepticism
is good! That should come naturally to a conspiracy theorist. :) )

Steuard Jensen

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113536 ]

Do, 18 August 2005 19:12

Yuk Tang

sbjensen [at] midway.uchicago.edu (Steuard Jensen) wrote in
news:qB2Ne.14$45.4334 [at] news.uchicago.edu:
> Quoth Michael O'Neill <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> in article
> <43046CE2.3912A9DC [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie>:
>
>> I am unable to prove or deny the provenance of this document,

A good indicator of BS.

>> posted recently to alt.binaries.e-books.flood, therefore the
>> comments herein must be taken with a large grain of salt.
>>
>> This post may shed some light on some of the myths by which men
>> sleep.
>
> Tell me, have you actually _read_ this document? Or any
> substantial part of it?

Goodness me, does this mean that you actually read through the whole or
a substantial part of it?

--
Cheers, ymt.

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113538 ]

Do, 18 August 2005 21:06

Pete Gray

In article <Xns96B6B92A84A14jimlaker2yahoocom [at] 130.133.1.4>, jim.laker2
[at] yahoo.com says...
> sbjensen [at] midway.uchicago.edu (Steuard Jensen) wrote in
> news:qB2Ne.14$45.4334 [at] news.uchicago.edu:
> > Quoth Michael O'Neill <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> in article
> > <43046CE2.3912A9DC [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie>:
> >
> >> I am unable to prove or deny the provenance of this document,
>
> A good indicator of BS.
>
>
> >> posted recently to alt.binaries.e-books.flood, therefore the
> >> comments herein must be taken with a large grain of salt.
> >>
> >> This post may shed some light on some of the myths by which men
> >> sleep.
> >
> > Tell me, have you actually _read_ this document? Or any
> > substantial part of it?
>
> Goodness me, does this mean that you actually read through the whole or
> a substantial part of it?
>

I like the idea of 'Navel Intelligence' though.

--
Pete Gray

Say No to ID Cards <http://www.no2id.net>
<http://www.redbadge.co.uk/no2idcards/>

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113539 ]

Do, 18 August 2005 20:36

Derek Broughton

Steuard Jensen wrote:

>
> So, yeah. Some conspiracy theories might actually be true, but the
> vast majority are certainly rubbish. I suggest that in the future,
> you take a bit more care to distinguish between the two. (Skepticism
> is good! That should come naturally to a conspiracy theorist. :) )
>
There really is a plot to make me believe in conspiracy theories...
--
derek

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113552 ]

Fr, 19 August 2005 03:17

jwkenne

The language is utterly false to the supposed provenance. William Henry
Ireland's "Vortigern and Rowena" was a better forgery than this.

By the way, is "Navel Intelligence" concerned with oranges or with omphaloi?

--
John W. Kennedy
"...when you're trying to build a house of cards, the last thing you
should do is blow hard and wave your hands like a madman."
-- Rupert Goodwins

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113562 ]

Fr, 19 August 2005 12:01

onq

Yuk Tang wrote:
>
> sbjensen [at] midway.uchicago.edu (Steuard Jensen) wrote in
> news:qB2Ne.14$45.4334 [at] news.uchicago.edu:
> > Quoth Michael O'Neill <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> in article
> > <43046CE2.3912A9DC [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie>:
> >
> >> I am unable to prove or deny the provenance of this document,
>
> A good indicator of BS.
>
> >> posted recently to alt.binaries.e-books.flood, therefore the
> >> comments herein must be taken with a large grain of salt.
> >>
> >> This post may shed some light on some of the myths by which men
> >> sleep.
> >
> > Tell me, have you actually _read_ this document? Or any
> > substantial part of it?
>
> Goodness me, does this mean that you actually read through the whole or
> a substantial part of it?

<chuckle>

Known as seeding fertile ground.

M.

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113563 ]

Fr, 19 August 2005 12:24

onq

Steuard Jensen wrote:
>
> Quoth Michael O'Neill <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> in article
> <43046CE2.3912A9DC [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie>:
> > I am unable to prove or deny the provenance of this document, posted
> > recently to alt.binaries.e-books.flood, therefore the comments herein
> > must be taken with a large grain of salt.
> ...
> > This post may shed some light on some of the myths by which men sleep.
>
> Tell me, have you actually _read_ this document?

<snip>

Of course.

Its a propaganda piece by people who have/intend to manipulate the world
by causing wars and exerting monopolistic control over commodities. The
people it was intended for are for the most part not that well educated.
This was in the 1950's and there were some people in America who, despite
good education, believed in the McCarthy Trials AND in race supremacy,
neither of which were founded in scientific analysis.

In that sense this is a "belief" document, or statement of intent.

However, this Science you seem to praise so highly is nothing more than
the collection of theories that seem to best fit known facts on any given
date. There is little "factual" about scientific development. Belief,
imagination, inspiration, error, chance and intuition play a huge part in
developing the theories we accept today.

How long did doctors belief that all ulcers were caused by stomach acid
acting on the stomach lining and required treatment with mogadon or some
other antacid tablet? How many people died from complications from
bleeding ulcers because not one thought to investigate a bacterial cause
in a part of the body, that along with other organs relies on
approximately 2lbs of bacterial matter to help in digestion?

Until an Australian scientist discovered the H. Pylori bacterium? How
long and how many believed the erroneous "Facts" peddled by qualified
doctors and professors?

So if someone issued a document in the 1950's claiming to understand the
human population in terms of other scientific phenomena, don't
immediately discount it as rubbish. Part of its purpose was to explain
and justify extraordinary behaviour in terms well-brought up people, i.e.
non-criminals could accept when allied to issues of "National Security",
i.e. - making America "strong".

The point of posting it wasn't to issue certifiable methods fo population
control but to show how a certain groups of élite deviants viewed the
population as a whole.

I found this document only this week, but most of my past posts on
America and the way it is run differentiate between Joe and Jane public
and this corrupt élite. This document is to be the first commentary I've
come across that shows where that self-justified mindset arises.

It doesn't matter if the principles are haywire or that they echo the
tenets of the Third Reich. What matters is that some people believed in
these concepts and still do. Influential people. Powerful people. Rich
people. Political people. Security Services people.

You investigate the fabric of the piece, stating its not soundly founded
in fact, ignoring the obvious conclusion that politics is seldom founded
in fact and the use of fear uncertainty and doubt by the powers that rule
America is a matter of record.

> So, yeah. Some conspiracy theories might actually be true, but the
> vast majority are certainly rubbish.

Without showing proof you state this. You logically attack a propaganda
piece, mistaking my intent, but immediately "the vast majority" of
conspiracy theories! That's not logical! LOL!

Here's a conspiracy FACT.

The wound that killed John FitzGerald Kennedy splattered 20% of his rear
brain over the rear seat and trunk of the open car in which he had been
travelling. He had been facing forward at the time. It was an exit wound.
The only entry wound near his head was in his neck. Wherever the shot
came from, it was NOT from the Book Depository.

> I suggest that in the future,
> you take a bit more care to distinguish between the two. (Skepticism
> is good! That should come naturally to a conspiracy theorist. :) )
>
> Steuard Jensen

I *have* distinguished between the two.

Americans in general have a reasonable standard of education but possess
a fanatical loyalty to the flag. ANY criticism of the élite that rules
them is not acceptable. They currently occupy a country that has never
directly threatened the American people. I'd say the facts support the
theory.

You are using your intelligence to avoid facing the facts I have brought
to your attention. You may go back to the feeding trough now and spend
the rest of your life distracting yourself from what is really going on.

:-D

M.

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113564 ]

Fr, 19 August 2005 12:39

onq

John W. Kennedy wrote:

> The language is utterly false to the supposed provenance.

<snip>

A base denial without any supporting facts.

I point to the invasion of a sovereign country with which America was not
at war and its continued occupation of that country as proof that the
methods described in the posted text have being used successfully in
recent history.

Where is your rebuttal? That there is one form or mode of expression for
this kind of document or for documents apparently ascribed to a
particular source? Without knowing the context?

Not good enough.

Your grounding in such documents arises from where, exactly?

Hanging around the literature groups?

Or do you have "National Security Clearance?"

M.

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113567 ]

Fr, 19 August 2005 13:05

Yuk Tang

Michael O'Neill <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> wrote in
news:4305ADF5.3AA0AAC2 [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie:
> Yuk Tang wrote:
>>
>> sbjensen [at] midway.uchicago.edu (Steuard Jensen) wrote in
>> news:qB2Ne.14$45.4334 [at] news.uchicago.edu:
>> > Quoth Michael O'Neill <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> in article
>> > <43046CE2.3912A9DC [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie>:
>> >
>> >> I am unable to prove or deny the provenance of this document,
>>
>> A good indicator of BS.
>>
>> >> posted recently to alt.binaries.e-books.flood, therefore the
>> >> comments herein must be taken with a large grain of salt.
>> >>
>> >> This post may shed some light on some of the myths by which
>> >> men sleep.
>> >
>> > Tell me, have you actually _read_ this document? Or any
>> > substantial part of it?
>>
>> Goodness me, does this mean that you actually read through the
>> whole or a substantial part of it?
>
> <chuckle>
>
> Known as seeding fertile ground.

But if one places too many seeds in too small a patch of ground, they
compete with each other to the extent that they won't sprout
properly, or a few do and the rest won't. It also helps if the seeds
are sound to begin with, not rotten.

You'll probably know that I'm not exactly a fan of Bush, and am
inclined to believe the worst of him (due to experience showing that
the worst is probably closest to the truth). But even I would want
better evidence than 'I am unable to prove or deny the provenance of
this document', which IMO is a reliable indicator of BS.

Also, keep OT stuff out of rabt. They don't like it there.

--
Cheers, ymt.

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113568 ]

Fr, 19 August 2005 13:17

onq

Yuk Tang wrote:
>
> Michael O'Neill <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> wrote in
> news:4305ADF5.3AA0AAC2 [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie:

<snip>

> > <chuckle>
> >
> > Known as seeding fertile ground.

> But if one places too many seeds in too small a patch of ground, they
> compete with each other to the extent that they won't sprout
> properly, or a few do and the rest won't. It also helps if the seeds
> are sound to begin with, not rotten.

> You'll probably know that I'm not exactly a fan of Bush, and am
> inclined to believe the worst of him (due to experience showing that
> the worst is probably closest to the truth). But even I would want
> better evidence than 'I am unable to prove or deny the provenance of
> this document', which IMO is a reliable indicator of BS.

> Also, keep OT stuff out of rabt. They don't like it there.

> --
> Cheers, ymt.

Seeds that produce what appear to be weeds in the well-ordered rabt
garden may not be rotten. Disclaimers stating fact to avoid
misrepresentation do not in and of themselves undermine the contents of
the following text, none of which was written by me. This matters goes
not to the current president, but to his predecessors of both parties
going back several generations and the funders of WWII, Thyssen and
United Bank, aka Walker, Bush and Harriman.

The undeniable effects of such policies and the edges of the policies
themselves have been the subject of many commentaries by me over the past
four years or so. This is the first document I have found that gets near
the seminal mindset prevalent in the 1950's which led to the formulation
of said policies. To that extent, I give it *some* credibility and
publish if for others to read who may be affected by those policies.

As for newsgroups, the segregation of information into pre-digested
"bytes" is a great form of censorship. Seeing the censors, one acquires
an education in the effects of at least one of the policies described in
the posted text. Information control. Unless a group I was posting to was
deliberately being targeted by a flame group TROLLed to an unreasonable
degree, online personas impersonated, lies posted about a poster, or
flooded, I have not posted against someone.

It is instructive to see the lack of tolerance and immediate knee-jerk
reaction from those conditioned souls who are under the yoke of
information imperialism they have set on their own shoulders. You used
not to be one of those. Please tell me this hasn't changed.

M.

PS as usual, you're correct about Bush, but in American you're talking a
dual party system and both parties are the same under the skin now.

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113571 ]

Fr, 19 August 2005 13:37

Baronjosefr

"Yuk Tang" <jim.laker2 [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96B6B92A84A14jimlaker2yahoocom [at] 130.133.1.4...
> sbjensen [at] midway.uchicago.edu (Steuard Jensen) wrote in
> news:qB2Ne.14$45.4334 [at] news.uchicago.edu:
>> Quoth Michael O'Neill <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> in article
>> <43046CE2.3912A9DC [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie>:
>>
>>> I am unable to prove or deny the provenance of this document,
>
> A good indicator of BS.
>
>
>>> posted recently to alt.binaries.e-books.flood, therefore the
>>> comments herein must be taken with a large grain of salt.
>>>
>>> This post may shed some light on some of the myths by which men
>>> sleep.
>>
>> Tell me, have you actually _read_ this document? Or any
>> substantial part of it?
>
> Goodness me, does this mean that you actually read through the whole or
> a substantial part of it?
>
>
> --
> Cheers, ymt.

Typical O'Neil. Take something that is, on it's face, completely wacky, and
try to present it as verifiable fact. I like the whole "I take this with a
grain of salt" item, yet he would still hope it is fact and wants to
convince others of it's authenticity. Which is why he presented it in the
first place. My persoanl favorite part of the whole thing is the alleged
chain of custody, combines with the fact that this is all coming out 20-odd
years later.

It is good to see that O'Neil is consistent, and that his foil beanie
remains firmly on top of his head.

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113572 ]

Fr, 19 August 2005 13:39

Baronjosefr

"Michael O'Neill" <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> wrote in message
news:4305B6EA.6039A3EA [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie...
> John W. Kennedy wrote:
>
>> The language is utterly false to the supposed provenance.
>
> <snip>
>
> A base denial without any supporting facts.
>
> I point to the invasion of a sovereign country with which America was not
> at war and its continued occupation of that country as proof that the
> methods described in the posted text have being used successfully in
> recent history.
>
> Where is your rebuttal? That there is one form or mode of expression for
> this kind of document or for documents apparently ascribed to a
> particular source? Without knowing the context?
>
> Not good enough.
>
> Your grounding in such documents arises from where, exactly?
>
> Hanging around the literature groups?
>
> Or do you have "National Security Clearance?"
>
> M.

Notice at the beginning of the idiocy O'Neil claims to have taken it with a
grain of salt but is now vociferously defending the whole thing as
verifiable fact and common sense truth?

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113573 ]

Fr, 19 August 2005 14:01

Yuk Tang

Once again, setting followups to aft.

Michael O'Neill <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> wrote in
news:4305BFD6.8B9A11D5 [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie:
> Yuk Tang wrote:
>> Michael O'Neill <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> wrote in
>> news:4305ADF5.3AA0AAC2 [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie:
>
> <snip>
>
>> > <chuckle>
>> >
>> > Known as seeding fertile ground.
>
>> But if one places too many seeds in too small a patch of ground,
>> they compete with each other to the extent that they won't sprout
>> properly, or a few do and the rest won't. It also helps if the
>> seeds are sound to begin with, not rotten.
>
>> You'll probably know that I'm not exactly a fan of Bush, and am
>> inclined to believe the worst of him (due to experience showing
>> that the worst is probably closest to the truth). But even I
>> would want better evidence than 'I am unable to prove or deny the
>> provenance of this document', which IMO is a reliable indicator
>> of BS.
>
>> Also, keep OT stuff out of rabt. They don't like it there.
>
> Seeds that produce what appear to be weeds in the well-ordered
> rabt garden may not be rotten. Disclaimers stating fact to avoid
> misrepresentation do not in and of themselves undermine the
> contents of the following text, none of which was written by me.
> This matters goes not to the current president, but to his
> predecessors of both parties going back several generations and
> the funders of WWII, Thyssen and United Bank, aka Walker, Bush and
> Harriman.

Disclaimers do not in and of themselves undermine the contents of the
following text. However, I've read enough histories and articles to
recognise the signs of falsehood, or at least ill-researched
allegations. I've described before the Tacitan technique of
expounding at length on a subject, going into detail and their
implications, followed by the disclaimer that however, the above was
not proved. It was a sign of BS back then in Domitian's day, and
it's a sign of BS now in Bush's day.

> The undeniable effects of such policies and the edges of the
> policies themselves have been the subject of many commentaries by
> me over the past four years or so. This is the first document I
> have found that gets near the seminal mindset prevalent in the
> 1950's which led to the formulation of said policies. To that
> extent, I give it *some* credibility and publish if for others to
> read who may be affected by those policies.
>
> As for newsgroups, the segregation of information into
> pre-digested "bytes" is a great form of censorship.

That may be so, but it must still be remembered that information
needs to be *communicated*. Unless one has a captive audience, the
receiver may exercise his freedom to not read or listen. Thus the
information should have a hook to draw in the audience, or else
they'll just do as I did, and not bother.

> Seeing the
> censors, one acquires an education in the effects of at least one
> of the policies described in the posted text. Information control.
> Unless a group I was posting to was deliberately being targeted by
> a flame group TROLLed to an unreasonable degree, online personas
> impersonated, lies posted about a poster, or flooded, I have not
> posted against someone.

It's merely politeness, especially if there is already a group with a
similar audience that has been set for that purpose. If I go to a
pub with friends and start talking about climate change, they may be
bored, but they'll recognise that all kinds of conversations go on in
a pub. If I go to a chess club and do the same, they'll be bored,
and they'll ask WTF it has to do with chess.

> It is instructive to see the lack of tolerance and immediate
> knee-jerk reaction from those conditioned souls who are under the
> yoke of information imperialism they have set on their own
> shoulders. You used not to be one of those. Please tell me this
> hasn't changed.
>
> M.
>
> PS as usual, you're correct about Bush, but in American you're
> talking a dual party system and both parties are the same under
> the skin now.

However, I take the view that what goes on in other countries are
none of my business, as long as they don't affect mine. On that
basis I opposed the war in Iraq. On that basis I told Ty and
BaronjosefR to eff off regarding the British response to the London
bombings. On that basis I couldn't care less what the US does in
domestic politics, as it's nowt to do with me. Americans could elect
a neo-fascistic red under the bed police state for all I care, as
long as their foreign policy is largely acceptable to the rest of the
world, which it currently isn't.

--
Cheers, ymt.

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113574 ]

Fr, 19 August 2005 16:13

jwkenne

Michael O'Neill wrote:
> John W. Kennedy wrote:
>
>
>>The language is utterly false to the supposed provenance.
>
>
> <snip>
>
> A base denial without any supporting facts.

You provided the only facts necessary -- the forgery itself. The only
remaining question is whether you personally forged it.

--
John W. Kennedy
"But now is a new thing which is very old--
that the rich make themselves richer and not poorer,
which is the true Gospel, for the poor's sake."
-- Charles Williams. "Judgement at Chelmsford"

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113575 ]

Fr, 19 August 2005 19:43

androgynouspauly

Dan C wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 12:11:30 +0100, Michael O'Neill wrote:
>
> > I am unable to prove or deny the provenance of this document, posted
>
> Keep your off-topic bullshit to yourself, you ignorant little moron.
>

Why don't you find a moderated Tolkien forum if you really can't stand
the trolls and jokers on here?? Given that much of pop-culture related
Usenet seems to have been virtually abandoned to the spammers, I think
it's safe to assume that site forums are where everyone has gone.
Either that or they just got a life...

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113579 ]

Fr, 19 August 2005 22:24

Huan the hound

On 2005-08-19, Michael O'Neill <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> wrote in
<4305BFD6.8B9A11D5 [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie>:

> Seeds that produce what appear to be weeds in the well-ordered rabt
> garden may not be rotten.
[snip]
> As for newsgroups, the segregation of information into pre-digested
> "bytes" is a great form of censorship.
[snip]

A lot of people read both AFT and RABT. So, since many posters have asked
you to keep this junk off RABT, the odds are good they're seeing it in AFT
too and *not* complaining about it there. Therefore, you don't really need
to be concerned about censorship or segregation in the Tolkien newsgroups.
Killfiles, filters, and people automatically hitting "Delete" when a post
from you appears should trouble you more than limiting your OT posts to
one Tolkien newsgroup.

--
Huan, the hound of Valinor

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #113580 ]

Fr, 19 August 2005 23:16

sbjensen

Quoth Michael O'Neill <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie> in article
<4305B373.8B884020 [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie>:
> Steuard Jensen wrote:
> > Quoth Michael O'Neill <onq [at] bwahahaha.indigo.ie>:
> > > This post may shed some light on some of the myths by which men sleep.

> > Tell me, have you actually _read_ this document?

> Of course.

> Its a propaganda piece by people who have/intend to manipulate the world
> by causing wars and exerting monopolistic control over commodities.

Oh, I agree that it's a propaganda piece. But I don't for a moment
believe that it was written in the 1950s, 1960s, or even 1980s. As I
argued, I'm pretty convinced that it's a recent forgery (and a poor
one at that) intended to aggravate those prone to believing in any of
the wide range of nastiness that it purports to describe. That's a
form of propaganda, certainly.

> The people it was intended for are for the most part not that well
> educated.

Maybe so, maybe not. But in any case, to my eye it seems quite likely
that one of the people it was intended for was you. :)

> However, this Science you seem to praise so highly is nothing more
> than the collection of theories that seem to best fit known facts on
> any given date. There is little "factual" about scientific
> development.

Have you had smallpox lately? Do you know anyone who's had smallpox
lately? No? How about polio? No? (Or if your answer happens to be
yes to that one, I'm pretty sure that the case in question was
contracted in or near a nation that had recently rejected scientific
medicine and its immunization efforts.) Imperfect though it
inevitably is, science works.

It is a plain, hard, scientific fact that quantum mechanics does a
good job of describing the behavior of diodes and transistors and
other electronic components. And unless you think that the two of us
sitting and typing at our computers isn't a fact, I'd say that there's
an awful lot of factual evidence to be found for that particular bit
of science.

> Belief, imagination, inspiration, error, chance and intuition play a
> huge part in developing the theories we accept today.

Of course they do. And scientists can be horribly mistaken about
things for long stretches of time. I've never said that science is
always right or that it's ever final! But you know what? The current
"collection of theories that seem to best fit known facts" is
fantastically successful, by any measure. There's plenty of progress
to be had in the future, but you can't look at modern science and
technology and say that there's nothing to it. For better or worse,
it works.

> So if someone issued a document in the 1950's claiming to understand
> the human population in terms of other scientific phenomena, don't
> immediately discount it as rubbish.

Well, I can certainly dismiss the "science" itself as rubbish: it is,
whether anyone at the time believed in it or not. But I thought you'd
claimed to have seen evidence that these policies were put in place!
You said,

"I note that the apparent results of the policies described therein
on the American public have been commented upon before now by
Europeans."

My main point in highlighting the impossiblity of the "science" put
forth here was to make it clear that the policies in here could never
have been implemented in any effective way if this was the methodology
they hoped to use. Whatever may have led to the current state of the
world, the ideas in this document weren't it.

I am certain that anyone who had studied the matter would have easily
recognized the fake science in this document as being fundamentally
flawed, especially by the late 1970s when it was supposedly written.
Easily. (The document itself can't possibly date to the 1950s: the
thing talks about UPC codes, which weren't used until 1974.) So
either this thing is a fake, or it was written by and for incompetents
and thus could never have led to any observable results anyway.

> The point of posting it wasn't to issue certifiable methods fo
> population control but to show how a certain groups of élite
> deviants viewed the population as a whole.

And as I said before, the writing of this thing does not look remotely
like what I'd expect if it were actually directed at that sort of
group. I mean, c'mon, it included the "hidden numbers under the
skin"/"mark of the Beast" bit!

> > So, yeah. Some conspiracy theories might actually be true, but
> > the vast majority are certainly rubbish.

> Without showing proof you state this. You logically attack a
> propaganda piece, mistaking my intent, but immediately "the vast
> majority" of conspiracy theories! That's not logical! LOL!

On the contrary! There's a perfectly good reason to believe that the
vast majority of conspiracy theories are rubbish: they can't all be
true. Just think about how many totally different groups have been
blamed for JFK's death alone. Unless the grassy knoll was occupied by
the CIA, the FBI, hitmen for a bunch of military contractors, the mob,
Cuban exiles, Cuban agents, the Secret Service, the Freemasons, the
Illuminati, assassins helping Kennedy commit suicide, and a team of
space aliens all at once, the vast majority of those theories are
bound to be untrue.

There are a lot of crackpot notions out there, but only one truth,
whether we have found it or not.

> You are using your intelligence to avoid facing the facts I have
> brought to your attention. You may go back to the feeding trough now
> and spend the rest of your life distracting yourself from what is
> really going on.

And happily so, if that means that you won't be posting any more of
these off-topic rants to the Tolkien groups. :)

Steuard Jensen

Re: Control Systems for the Masses [message #131992 ]

So, 11 September 2005 16:03

onq

John W. Kennedy wrote:
>
> Michael O'Neill wrote:
> > John W. Kennedy wrote:
> >
> >
> >>The language is utterly false to the supposed provenance.
> >
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > A base denial without any supporting facts.
>
> You provided the only facts necessary -- the forgery itself. The only
> remaining question is whether you personally forged it.

There are several questions raised by it.

But the one I specifically asked you to answer is the provision of proof
of your assertion that its a forgery.

You didn't.

Which in itself is a kind of endorsement, wouldn't you say?

*mheh*

M.

Vorheriges Thema:	COTW Appendix F11 - On Translation
Nächstes Thema:	Re: New Orleans = N$By2(Benor?

Gehe zu:

-=] Zurück zum Anfang [=-

aktuelle Zeit: Mi Mai 23 21:23:53 CEST 2012

Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,07388 Sekunden

.:: Startseite - Hinweise - Impressum ::.