Sprinkler Systems Uhaul move Lawn care Roses and trees Ford Parts Chrysler Parts Lake Powell New IPod Touch Apps New IPhone Apps IPhone Apps IPad Information IPad Apps Android APPS Android Games APPS Android Systems Android Tablets APPS and Beyond Smartphone Apps Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools Tablet PC Car Sharing Car Leasing Tabler Pc Fly Fishing Toyota Cars Vacation Rentals Stock market NYSE SSE Stock Freight & Shipping News Gluten Lactose Gout My Coupon Life Campgrounds Check Outdoor Kitchen Design and Redoo Bath Remodeling Palm Springs Las Vegas Vacation Tipps Lake Powell Boating Homes for lease Electric and green Car Blog Pearls and diamonds Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
Reader


[Suche]  [Administrator]  [Hinweise zum Reader]  [Startseite]
Fantasy » alt.fan.dragons » D&D dragon discussion
D&D dragon discussion [message #109142] Mo, 15 August 2005 19:09
Scott L  
Who here likes D&D?

I've been chatting with a fellow on the WotC boards about enhancing
dragons in the current incarnation of the game, and here's the link:

http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?t=478652

I'm scott644 there.

Anyways, comments and involvement would be great - we're looking
forward to seeing how folks with a vested interest like it!

Just a Monkey,

Scott

--
Visit me at http://4dw.net/moonfriend/index.html
Find the KMG (KY/Midwest Gather) at http://www.wertle.com/midwest.html
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111783 ] Mi, 17 August 2005 05:24
Draco18s  
In article <c%3Me.271377$xm3.161570 [at] attbi_s21>, spamtrap644 [at] insightbb.com
says...
> Who here likes D&D?

I do.

> I've been chatting with a fellow on the WotC boards about enhancing
> dragons in the current incarnation of the game, and here's the link:
>
> http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?t=478652
>
> I'm scott644 there.
>
> Anyways, comments and involvement would be great - we're looking
> forward to seeing how folks with a vested interest like it!

I can't read the whole thread, but I like the idea.

--
Draco18s
DC2.Dw Gm L- W- T Phvwalt Sks Cag^ Bco|# A- Fr Nu M--- O H+ $ Fo R+++ Ac+ J+
S+ I-# V++ Q++ Tc+++[C++]/Tc--- E+

"Yum!" |> v-v-v-v |>
| , , .|. | n | .|.
'. |_/| | |'''''''''''| | \
(q p),-| | HERSHEY'S | |'-._ ))
/_(/ | | CHO|"|LIT | | ) '-.___//
---W"W----'-'----'-'----'-'----------'--------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111792 ] Mi, 17 August 2005 15:02
Scott L  
Draco18s wrote:

> In article <c%3Me.271377$xm3.161570 [at] attbi_s21>,
> spamtrap644 [at] insightbb.com says...
> > Who here likes D&D?
>
> I do.
>
> > I've been chatting with a fellow on the WotC boards about enhancing
> > dragons in the current incarnation of the game, and here's the link:
> >
> > http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?t=478652
> >
> > I'm scott644 there.
> >
> > Anyways, comments and involvement would be great - we're looking
> > forward to seeing how folks with a vested interest like it!
>
> I can't read the whole thread, but I like the idea.

Cool! I'd mentioned I was in contact with the international dragon
community, and the original poster was extrememly interested in our
opinions! I know mine is positive, but I worked on it so I'm biased.
^_^ So it's good to hear from you.

Just a Monkey,

Scott,

--
Visit me at http://4dw.net/moonfriend/index.html
Find the KMG (KY/Midwest Gather) at http://www.wertle.com/midwest.html
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111799 ] Mi, 17 August 2005 19:09
Draco18s  
In article <rzGMe.259391$_o.146653 [at] attbi_s71>, spamtrap644 [at] insightbb.com
says...
> Draco18s wrote:
>
> > In article <c%3Me.271377$xm3.161570 [at] attbi_s21>,
> > spamtrap644 [at] insightbb.com says...
> > > Who here likes D&D?
> >
> > I do.
> >
> > > I've been chatting with a fellow on the WotC boards about enhancing
> > > dragons in the current incarnation of the game, and here's the link:
> > >
> > > http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?t=478652
> > >
> > > I'm scott644 there.
> > >
> > > Anyways, comments and involvement would be great - we're looking
> > > forward to seeing how folks with a vested interest like it!
> >
> > I can't read the whole thread, but I like the idea.
>
> Cool! I'd mentioned I was in contact with the international dragon
> community, and the original poster was extrememly interested in our
> opinions! I know mine is positive, but I worked on it so I'm biased.
> ^_^ So it's good to hear from you.

Keep in mind I read to about...oh into the first post right up to the bolded
dragon sizes.

--
Draco18s
DC2.Dw Gm L- W- T Phvwalt Sks Cag^ Bco|# A- Fr Nu M--- O H+ $ Fo R+++ Ac+ J+
S+ I-# V++ Q++ Tc+++[C++]/Tc--- E+

"Yum!" |> v-v-v-v |>
| , , .|. | n | .|.
'. |_/| | |'''''''''''| | \
(q p),-| | HERSHEY'S | |'-._ ))
/_(/ | | CHO|"|LIT | | ) '-.___//
---W"W----'-'----'-'----'-'----------'--------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111816 ] Do, 18 August 2005 06:13
Scott L  
Draco18s wrote:

> In article <rzGMe.259391$_o.146653 [at] attbi_s71>,
> spamtrap644 [at] insightbb.com says...
> > Draco18s wrote:
> >
> > > In article <c%3Me.271377$xm3.161570 [at] attbi_s21>,
> > > spamtrap644 [at] insightbb.com says...
> > > > Who here likes D&D?
> > >
> > > I do.
> > >
> > > > I've been chatting with a fellow on the WotC boards about
> > > > enhancing dragons in the current incarnation of the game, and
> > > > here's the link:
> > > >
> > > > http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?t=478652
> > > >
> > > > I'm scott644 there.
> > > >
> > > > Anyways, comments and involvement would be great - we're looking
> > > > forward to seeing how folks with a vested interest like it!
> > >
> > > I can't read the whole thread, but I like the idea.
> >
> > Cool! I'd mentioned I was in contact with the international dragon
> > community, and the original poster was extrememly interested in our
> > opinions! I know mine is positive, but I worked on it so I'm
> > biased. ^_^ So it's good to hear from you.
>
> Keep in mind I read to about...oh into the first post right up to the
> bolded dragon sizes.

hehe - well, see if you can skim through and at least lookit the first
post. That's the one we hammered out all the balance details on. ^_^

Just a Monkey,

Scott,

--
Visit me at http://4dw.net/moonfriend/index.html
Find the KMG (KY/Midwest Gather) at http://www.wertle.com/midwest.html
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111822 ] Do, 18 August 2005 10:11
Lord Flame Stryke  
On 17 Aug 2005, Scott L was found to have scratched
news:rzGMe.259391$_o.146653 [at] attbi_s71 on a rock in alt.fan.dragons:

>> > I've been chatting with a fellow on the WotC boards about enhancing
>> > dragons in the current incarnation of the game, and here's the
>> > link: http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?t=478652
>> > I'm scott644 there.
>> > Anyways, comments and involvement would be great - we're looking
>> > forward to seeing how folks with a vested interest like it!
>> I can't read the whole thread, but I like the idea.
> Cool! I'd mentioned I was in contact with the international dragon
> community, and the original poster was extrememly interested in our
> opinions! I know mine is positive, but I worked on it so I'm biased.
> ^_^ So it's good to hear from you.

Sorry, archived the post, haven't had time to peruse the thread on the
board, nor to reply. But here's my small amount of change:

I play dragons as often as I can, and I play them well. I'm not just
saying this, I've been complimented on my playing ability with a
hatchling in RIFTS. I had exactly the right kind of aloofness,
curiosity, playfulness, etc, etc, that a hatchling would have, plus I
got into some interesting moments.

As for dragons in D&D, there are 2 ways of doing things, from what I
understand. One is to use dragon age categories as just that: age
categories. At a certain age, you grow up, out, and more powerful.
This works fine if everyone's a dragon, since you can all "hibernate" at
the same time to allow yourself to grow. This doesn't work all that
well with other races, since they'd be dead or retired when you reach
the next category.

The other is to treat age categories as levels. Not 1 age category to 1
level, but say 1 age category for every 5 levels or so. I believe the
Draconomicon has rules for both methods, but I'm too lazy to go look it
up (it's in a whole other room!!) so perhaps I'll do that in the future
and get back to you.

Another option is the half-dragon template in the MM and the Dragon
Deciple prestige class in Tome and Blood. Granted they're not full
dragons, but they are draconic.

Yet another option, if you want to pick up the book, is Monte Cook's
Arcana Evolved. It's got two draconic races, the Dracha, who were made
by dragons in their image so they're strong and can fly (if you take
levels in the Dracha "class"); and the Mojh, who were humans that tried
to become dragons through magic, and have good magic abilities.

And there are prolly more ideas out there, either in other books, or in
other people's minds. All in all, what's needed is game balance. You
can't have a dragon go around with 1st level characters and expect
either the dragon to be challenged while not killing toe other PCs or to
mildly challenge the other PCs and keep the dragon interested.

I would say that dragons have to be in a higher level campaign (the
earliest one can be a PC according to one set of rules in the
Draconomicon is level 12 I believe), or perhaps as a periodic character
if you have someone who can't attend all the time. They only get XP for
the sessions they're there for, so even starting at level 1, a dragon
"sponsor" who only happens to appear once a month (playing time) would
start out very powerful, but eventually would begin to be less powerful
than the other PCs as time goes on.

But I'm rambling, as it's 0210, and I have to be up in less than 8 hours
and thus should be pretending to sleep. If I come up with any other
ideas, I'll be sure to let you know.

>
> Just a Monkey,
>
> Scott,
>
> --
> Visit me at http://4dw.net/moonfriend/index.html
> Find the KMG (KY/Midwest Gather) at http://www.wertle.com/midwest.html
>



Lord Flame Stryke

--
DC2.D~ Gm L120f60t180w W T Phawlt Sks Cbk,ere' Bfl A+++! Fr++ Nm M+ O H+
$ Fc~ R+++! Ac+++ J+ S++ U! I# V+++! Q Tc++ E++ Draco nigrum, oculi
rubere, suppositus, magus. http://www.geocities.com/flame_stryke/ |
http://www.geocities.com/flame_stryke/AFDList.html Holder of the Scroll
of Nobility from Lady Viriatha, Keeper of the Wand of Sparklies in its
case from Hex, Wielder of the Lady Viri Signature 4x8 from Ysable, Eater
of the Mint Cheesecake from Whisper, Mate to Lady Viriatha, Owner of
Flame Stryke's Windex® Factory, Lord Balloonmaker, Borrower of the Ebony
Wood Fife from Luxatos, Accepter of the Small Statue of a Green Dragon
Covered in Ice Cream Toppings from Juniper, Employer of a miniature
Jester doll from SeaKing, Bearer of the Magic Ever-Bill from SeaKing,
Carrier of the gold piece from whisper: o, Builder of Dragon Fyre Keep,
First Dragon of Realism, Giver of the Pickaxe of Icebreaking to Kalos

--
"It appears to be a robotic arm." -- Data
"How astute." -- Warf
-- Star Trek: Nemesis
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111823 ] Do, 18 August 2005 14:53
Scott L  
Lord Flame Stryke wrote:

> On 17 Aug 2005, Scott L was found to have scratched
> news:rzGMe.259391$_o.146653 [at] attbi_s71 on a rock in alt.fan.dragons:
>
> >> > I've been chatting with a fellow on the WotC boards about
> enhancing >> > dragons in the current incarnation of the game, and
> here's the >> > link:
> http://boards1.wizards.com/showthread.php?t=478652 >> > I'm scott644
> there. >> > Anyways, comments and involvement would be great - we're
> looking >> > forward to seeing how folks with a vested interest like
> it! >> I can't read the whole thread, but I like the idea.
> > Cool! I'd mentioned I was in contact with the international dragon
> > community, and the original poster was extrememly interested in our
> > opinions! I know mine is positive, but I worked on it so I'm
> > biased. ^_^ So it's good to hear from you.
>
> Sorry, archived the post, haven't had time to peruse the thread on the
> board, nor to reply. But here's my small amount of change:
>
> I play dragons as often as I can, and I play them well. I'm not just
> saying this, I've been complimented on my playing ability with a
> hatchling in RIFTS. I had exactly the right kind of aloofness,
> curiosity, playfulness, etc, etc, that a hatchling would have, plus I
> got into some interesting moments.
>
> As for dragons in D&D, there are 2 ways of doing things, from what I
> understand. One is to use dragon age categories as just that: age
> categories. At a certain age, you grow up, out, and more powerful.
> This works fine if everyone's a dragon, since you can all "hibernate"
> at the same time to allow yourself to grow. This doesn't work all
> that well with other races, since they'd be dead or retired when you
> reach the next category.
>
> The other is to treat age categories as levels. Not 1 age category
> to 1 level, but say 1 age category for every 5 levels or so. I
> believe the Draconomicon has rules for both methods, but I'm too lazy
> to go look it up (it's in a whole other room!!) so perhaps I'll do
> that in the future and get back to you.
>
> Another option is the half-dragon template in the MM and the Dragon
> Deciple prestige class in Tome and Blood. Granted they're not full
> dragons, but they are draconic.
>
> Yet another option, if you want to pick up the book, is Monte Cook's
> Arcana Evolved. It's got two draconic races, the Dracha, who were
> made by dragons in their image so they're strong and can fly (if you
> take levels in the Dracha "class"); and the Mojh, who were humans
> that tried to become dragons through magic, and have good magic
> abilities.
>
> And there are prolly more ideas out there, either in other books, or
> in other people's minds. All in all, what's needed is game balance.
> You can't have a dragon go around with 1st level characters and expect
> either the dragon to be challenged while not killing toe other PCs or
> to mildly challenge the other PCs and keep the dragon interested.
>
> I would say that dragons have to be in a higher level campaign (the
> earliest one can be a PC according to one set of rules in the
> Draconomicon is level 12 I believe), or perhaps as a periodic
> character if you have someone who can't attend all the time. They
> only get XP for the sessions they're there for, so even starting at
> level 1, a dragon "sponsor" who only happens to appear once a month
> (playing time) would start out very powerful, but eventually would
> begin to be less powerful than the other PCs as time goes on.
>
> But I'm rambling, as it's 0210, and I have to be up in less than 8
> hours and thus should be pretending to sleep. If I come up with any
> other ideas, I'll be sure to let you know.

Actually, the way D&D currently runs, every HD is a level, adding your
character's Level Adjustment to find your total ECL. It's best running
them now as the 1 for 1 that way, adjusting for the LA. The game
allows for having more HD than a dragon's age category allows, by
simply advancing them an effective category every 3 HD. There are two
schools of thought for running them now; strictly by racial level and
age categories ignored, or requiring the first three levels after the
age marker be racial levels so they'll qualify for the next age
category when it comes. Either way, dragons can now take class levels
as well; it's really cool. You should post up in that thread - keeping
my points in mind. With your experience, you could give ideas as to
what we as DM's could expect with PC and NPC characters playing dragons.

Oh, and btw, with the Level Adjustment system, you don't have to
restrict it to all are dragons/none are dragons any more. ^_^

Just a Monkey,

Scott,

--
Visit me at http://4dw.net/moonfriend/index.html
Find the KMG (KY/Midwest Gather) at http://www.wertle.com/midwest.html
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111836 ] Fr, 19 August 2005 06:59
Starbles  
You know how I'd create dragons? I'd create opalescent (or gemstone
like, if that's the correct word for it) dragons, three of which would
be true neutral, one of which would be lawful evil, and one of which
would be chaotic good. Either that or create three opalescent dragons,
one more metallic, and one more chromatic. What do you think? Of
course, these would be additions to, not replacements for, the current
dragon set.
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111839 ] Fr, 19 August 2005 07:51
Lord Flame Stryke  
On 18 Aug 2005, Scott L was found to have scratched
news:Ax%Me.37015$084.35821 [at] attbi_s22 on a rock in alt.fan.dragons:

>> But I'm rambling, as it's 0210, and I have to be up in less than 8
>> hours and thus should be pretending to sleep. If I come up with any
>> other ideas, I'll be sure to let you know.
> Actually, the way D&D currently runs, every HD is a level, adding your
> character's Level Adjustment to find your total ECL. It's best
> running them now as the 1 for 1 that way, adjusting for the LA. The
> game allows for having more HD than a dragon's age category allows, by
> simply advancing them an effective category every 3 HD. There are two
> schools of thought for running them now; strictly by racial level and
> age categories ignored, or requiring the first three levels after the
> age marker be racial levels so they'll qualify for the next age
> category when it comes. Either way, dragons can now take class levels
> as well; it's really cool. You should post up in that thread -
> keeping my points in mind. With your experience, you could give ideas
> as to what we as DM's could expect with PC and NPC characters playing
> dragons.

Perhaps I will, one day when I get off work early enough to think.....

> Oh, and btw, with the Level Adjustment system, you don't have to
> restrict it to all are dragons/none are dragons any more. ^_^

I know that, I was refering to the age category idea, where most of
their lives will be spend doing other things, so they can come back at a
higher age category.

Also, an idea that a friend of mine came up with (since my hatchling was
way too underpowered) was to send me through a "time warp" so I cam back
aged a few hundred years. Not the best way, or a particularly
explicable way for most DMs, but still an idea.



Lord Flame Stryke

--
DC2.D~ Gm L120f60t180w W T Phawlt Sks Cbk,ere' Bfl A+++! Fr++ Nm M+ O H+
$ Fc~ R+++! Ac+++ J+ S++ U! I# V+++! Q Tc++ E++ Draco nigrum, oculi
rubere, suppositus, magus. http://www.geocities.com/flame_stryke/ |
http://www.geocities.com/flame_stryke/AFDList.html Holder of the Scroll
of Nobility from Lady Viriatha, Keeper of the Wand of Sparklies in its
case from Hex, Wielder of the Lady Viri Signature 4x8 from Ysable, Eater
of the Mint Cheesecake from Whisper, Mate to Lady Viriatha, Owner of
Flame Stryke's Windex® Factory, Lord Balloonmaker, Borrower of the Ebony
Wood Fife from Luxatos, Accepter of the Small Statue of a Green Dragon
Covered in Ice Cream Toppings from Juniper, Employer of a miniature
Jester doll from SeaKing, Bearer of the Magic Ever-Bill from SeaKing,
Carrier of the gold piece from whisper: o, Builder of Dragon Fyre Keep,
First Dragon of Realism, Giver of the Pickaxe of Icebreaking to Kalos

--
"The default Magic Word, "Abracadabra", actually is a corruption of the
Hebrew phrase "ha-Bracha dab'ra" which means "pronounce the blessing"."
-- Herd Thinners
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111840 ] Fr, 19 August 2005 07:54
Lord Flame Stryke  
On 18 Aug 2005, was found to have scratched
news:1124427587.589410.227490 [at] g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com on a rock in
alt.fan.dragons:

> You know how I'd create dragons? I'd create opalescent (or gemstone
> like, if that's the correct word for it) dragons, three of which would
> be true neutral, one of which would be lawful evil, and one of which
> would be chaotic good. Either that or create three opalescent dragons,
> one more metallic, and one more chromatic. What do you think? Of
> course, these would be additions to, not replacements for, the current
> dragon set.

2nd Edition has Gem Dragons, they're basically the Neutral faction, with
Chromatic being the Evil faction and Metallic being the Good faction.

The gem dragons from 2nd Ed are the Amethyst dragon (TN), Crystal dragon
(CN), Emerald dragon (LN), Sapphire dragon (LN), and Topaz dragon (CN).



Lord Flame Stryke

--
DC2.D~ Gm L120f60t180w W T Phawlt Sks Cbk,ere' Bfl A+++! Fr++ Nm M+ O H+
$ Fc~ R+++! Ac+++ J+ S++ U! I# V+++! Q Tc++ E++
Draco nigrum, oculi rubere, suppositus, magus.
http://www.geocities.com/flame_stryke/ |
http://www.geocities.com/flame_stryke/AFDList.html
Holder of the Scroll of Nobility from Lady Viriatha, Keeper of the Wand
of Sparklies in its case from Hex, Wielder of the Lady Viri Signature
4x8 from Ysable, Eater of the Mint Cheesecake from Whisper, Mate to Lady
Viriatha, Owner of Flame Stryke's Windex® Factory, Lord Balloonmaker,
Borrower of the Ebony Wood Fife from Luxatos, Accepter of the Small
Statue of a Green Dragon Covered in Ice Cream Toppings from Juniper,
Employer of a miniature Jester doll from SeaKing, Bearer of the Magic
Ever-Bill from SeaKing, Carrier of the gold piece from whisper: o,
Builder of Dragon Fyre Keep, First Dragon of Realism, Giver of the
Pickaxe of Icebreaking to Kalos

--
"Above all else -- sky." -- Herd Thinners
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111842 ] Fr, 19 August 2005 08:00
Starbles  
Really? That's interesting.

Do you know of a gem color that's midway between yellow and platinum?
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111844 ] Fr, 19 August 2005 08:16
Lord Flame Stryke  
On 19 Aug 2005, was found to have scratched
news:1124431244.436027.150120 [at] g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com on a rock in
alt.fan.dragons:

> Really? That's interesting.
> Do you know of a gem color that's midway between yellow and platinum?

Sorry, no.



Lord Flame Stryke

--
DC2.D~ Gm L120f60t180w W T Phawlt Sks Cbk,ere' Bfl A+++! Fr++ Nm M+ O H+
$ Fc~ R+++! Ac+++ J+ S++ U! I# V+++! Q Tc++ E++
Draco nigrum, oculi rubere, suppositus, magus.
http://www.geocities.com/flame_stryke/ |
http://www.geocities.com/flame_stryke/AFDList.html
Holder of the Scroll of Nobility from Lady Viriatha, Keeper of the Wand
of Sparklies in its case from Hex, Wielder of the Lady Viri Signature
4x8 from Ysable, Eater of the Mint Cheesecake from Whisper, Mate to Lady
Viriatha, Owner of Flame Stryke's Windex® Factory, Lord Balloonmaker,
Borrower of the Ebony Wood Fife from Luxatos, Accepter of the Small
Statue of a Green Dragon Covered in Ice Cream Toppings from Juniper,
Employer of a miniature Jester doll from SeaKing, Bearer of the Magic
Ever-Bill from SeaKing, Carrier of the gold piece from whisper: o,
Builder of Dragon Fyre Keep, First Dragon of Realism, Giver of the
Pickaxe of Icebreaking to Kalos

--
"How many seconds are there in a year? If I tell you there are 3.155 x
10^7, you won't even try to remember it. On the other hand, who could
forget that, to within half a percent, pi seconds is a nanocentury." --
Tom Duff, Bell Labs
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111846 ] Fr, 19 August 2005 14:06
Scott L  
On a dark and stormy night, Lord Flame Stryke whispered:

> On 19 Aug 2005, was found to have scratched
> news:1124431244.436027.150120 [at] g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com on a rock
> in alt.fan.dragons:
>
> > Really? That's interesting.
> > Do you know of a gem color that's midway between yellow and
> > platinum?
>
> Sorry, no.

Metallic dragons:
Brass and Copper - chaotic good
Bronze, Silver and Gold - lawful good

Chromatic dragons:
Blue and Green - lawful evil
White, Black and Red - chaotic evil

Gem dragons:
Amethyst (purple) - neutral
Crystal (clear) and Topaz (yellowish) - chaotic neutral
Emerld (green) and Sapphire (blue) - lawful neutral

Topaz is closest thing to what is asked. There are other "true"
dragons in the D&D world, but they're the planar dragons and not bound
by colors.

Just a Monkey,

Scott,

--
Visit me at http://4dw.net/moonfriend/index.html
Find the KMG (KY/Midwest Gather) at http://www.wertle.com/midwest.html
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111886 ] So, 21 August 2005 10:45
Starbles  
I was thinking of adding a platinum, yellow, and ruby dragon to the
mix. I was gonna go with heliodor, but then I realized I could just
make platinum and yellow interbreedable, turning them into a true
neutral cerrusite dragon. Platinum would be neutral good. Yellow would
be neutral evil. Ruby would be true neutral. Or maybe instead of ruby,
carnelian. Which would be orange and red, or red with orange.
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111889 ] So, 21 August 2005 13:24
Scott L  
On a dark and stormy night, Starbles [at] Earthlink.net whispered:

> I was thinking of adding a platinum, yellow, and ruby dragon to the
> mix. I was gonna go with heliodor, but then I realized I could just
> make platinum and yellow interbreedable, turning them into a true
> neutral cerrusite dragon. Platinum would be neutral good. Yellow would
> be neutral evil. Ruby would be true neutral. Or maybe instead of ruby,
> carnelian. Which would be orange and red, or red with orange.

Well, platinum is one of the dragon gods actually. Yellow isn't in 3.5
(but that's no reason to exclude it) - don't think I've ever even heard
of rudy. Combining all three though... hmm... a shiny orange dragon?
A chromium dragon?

Just a Monkey,

Scott,

--
Visit me at http://4dw.net/moonfriend/index.html
Find the KMG (KY/Midwest Gather) at http://www.wertle.com/midwest.html
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111890 ] So, 21 August 2005 22:59
Starbles  
Well, is there an iron dragon?

Better yet, just have the yellow dragon represent sulfur and have a
strontium dragon, which is naturally silver but turns yelow in air.
Then cerrusite would be a mixture of the two. The thing is, I don't
know if I should add another poisonous dragon, and I don't know if
strontium loses its metallic luster when it turns yellow. I suppose I
could just use yellow and iron, and use a yellowish gray, beige, to
represent cerrusite.
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111891 ] So, 21 August 2005 23:08
Starbles  
Better yet, if iron isn't taken, it would be yellow(sulfur),
iron(gray), and pyrite/fool's-gold.
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111892 ] So, 21 August 2005 23:23
Starbles  
BTW, Scott, do you have an E-mail address? One that I can use to
contact you?
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111893 ] So, 21 August 2005 23:40
Scott L  
On a dark and stormy night, Starbles [at] Earthlink.net whispered:

> BTW, Scott, do you have an E-mail address? One that I can use to
> contact you?

My email link is at the bottom of my web site. ^_^

Just a Monkey,

Scott,

--
Visit me at http://4dw.net/moonfriend/index.html
Find the KMG (KY/Midwest Gather) at http://www.wertle.com/midwest.html
Re: D&D dragon discussion [message #111895 ] Mo, 22 August 2005 02:38
Starbles  
Okay, thanks! I got it!
Vorheriges Thema:Away for the Weekend
Nächstes Thema:OT: Little Green Men
Gehe zu:
  


aktuelle Zeit: Mi Mai 23 16:37:27 CEST 2012

Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,05715 Sekunden
.:: Startseite - Hinweise - Impressum ::.

Powered