|
Sprinkler Systems
Uhaul move
Lawn care
Roses and trees
Ford Parts
Chrysler Parts
Lake Powell
New IPod Touch Apps
New IPhone Apps
IPhone Apps
IPad Information
IPad Apps
Android APPS
Android Games APPS
Android Systems
Android Tablets APPS and Beyond
Smartphone Apps
Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools
Tablet PC
Car Sharing Car Leasing
Tabler Pc
Fly Fishing
Toyota Cars
Vacation Rentals
Stock market
NYSE
SSE Stock
Freight & Shipping News
Gluten
Lactose
Gout
My Coupon Life
Campgrounds Check
Outdoor
Kitchen Design and Redoo
Bath Remodeling
Palm Springs
Las Vegas Vacation Tipps
Lake Powell Boating
Homes for lease
Electric and green Car Blog
Pearls and diamonds
Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App
Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
|
Science Fiction » alt.startrek » Hollywood Homosexuals and The Payola controlled Entertainment Business #2
| Hollywood Homosexuals and The Payola controlled Entertainment Business #2 [message #78363] |
Mi, 13 Juli 2005 02:04 |
|
Why do Hollywood Homosexuals and homosexuals in general
have such a resentment to marriage ? I can just imagine
these Hollywood Homosexual Neo-Conservative fatcats sitting
down with their young stars like Britney Spears and counseling:
================================================
Britney, you have to generate some media buzz for this new album.
Some of these songs are kinda weak.
Well how do you suggest we do that. Any ideas ?
How about you go on a big drinking binge, get sloshed all over
the street and wind up in the hospital for a night ?
Or jail would be even better !
I can't do that. My parents would never talk to me again
and I would be the laughing stock of my community.
Besides, my folks want me to get married soon as possible.
Well Britney, that sounds like a great idea ! Marriage always hits
the newspapers. They know those sheep out there are suckers
for a new union and a family and all that crap.
Yikes, but I'm not ready to marry anyone yet.
Britney, that is nooo problem. Just spill some cash on an
old friend and tell him to marry you for a short while.
A short while.... I thought marriage was for keeps...
Nah, marriage is just some scummy idea society has put together
to say that heterosexuals can do it and us homosexuals cannot.
Yeah ? But if I did that people would despise me.
No, not the people that count.
Who's that ?
Us. All us Hollywood Homosexuals running everything in the
entertainment business.
You guys are homosexuals ?
Yeah... Rich wealthy fatcat homosexuals. And to be perfectly honest
Britney, we would actually love you to
do a five minute fake marriage. Yeah, and stick a big hatchet knife in
that marriage crap that regular society says us homosexuals cannot do.
Well my daddy's a Republican...
Britney, so are we. We are Neo-Conservatives. We despise the
Left groups like The Poor, Blacks, Unions and Women etc just as
much as any other Conservative Republican. Heck, we do not
even film our movies and TV series in the US just so we can avoid
having to hire Union members and Blacks.
I thought Conservatives were against Sodomy...
Not us. Again, we are Neo-Conservatives. Identical to regular
Conservatives except we love Sodomy and Hate and want to mass
murder all Arabs/Moslems in the world.
All us Hollywood Homosexuals are Neo-Cons.
Yeah ? And you will still do the best promotion for the record and make
sure all the radio station program directors decide to play my record ?
Absolutely. And that airplay guarantees sales. We are planning on
printing up a million copies of the album for the first run.
But how are you going to do that when some of those radio stations
may not like this fake Hollywood Marriage thing and you just said
some of the songs are kinda weak ?
Well the radio station programmers would never balk on any of our records.
Whyzzat ?
Well, we have the programmers at all these major radio stations on our
Payola payroll.
Payola ? Whassat ?
Payola. We pay radio station programmers cash bribes
to play our records.
Are you serious ? I thought the radio programmers chose my songs and
others because they were good songs and wanted the best for their
listeners...
Oh come on Britney, how do think we persuade all these stations to
play our major record label crappy records all the time ?
Ain't no accident. Notice how they all play exactly the same track like
clockwork ?
Yeah, I kinda noticed that before on the last album...
Well, that is because we tell them what to play and when to play it.
We can guarantee you airplay and that guarantees you sales on both
the Album and each single we release off the album.
This sounds great ! You mean it don't matter how bad I sang
on my new record, it will be played anyway ?
Yup.
Great ! But my mom and dad ain't gonna like this fake marriage thing.
They raised me to believe that marriage was sacred. I could never
show my face at my local church anymore.
Britney, those are the sacrifices of stardom.. We can give stardom
and we can take it away.
But I ain't having sex with this guy !
Don't you worry Britney, we will have you in and out of this marriage
before you can say..."Trojan".
We know some seedy churches way out in Las Vegas where we can
take care of it. As soon as the 5 minute service is over, you go your
way, he goes his way.
Unless you two get into the feeling and want to make out ?!
No way !
Again Britney, those are the sacrifices of stardom.. We can give
stardom and we can take it away.
I see that now.
So Britney, do we have a deal ?
Uhh, let me think about it a sec...
Britney, look at this contract. See all those zeroes in that dollar figure
?
Wow, that's a lot of zeroes. That's one of those big numbers I learned
about in school !
Britney, this is the amount of money we want to give you for fulfilling
your end of this contract.
We want to write your name in that blank space.
You mean you want to give me all that money ? For this lousy album ?
Yeah, all for you Britney, as long as you play ball with us.
So, do we have a deal ?
Ya durn tooting we have a deal. Where do I sign ?
Right here.
Good.
Now, thought of anyone you want to fake Hollywood Marry yet ?
Yup, I have a friend from high school who could use the extra cash.
Britney, our lawyers already drew up the prenuptial agreement for this
fake marriage. Just write the name of that guy in here and we'll call him
right now.
Ok, here is his name and phone number.
By the way, Britney, do you have any songs lined up that could help
us tell the public out there how bad the Arabs/Moslems are and
how good Israel is ? Every Hollywood Homosexual Neo-Conservative
NeoCon we know would just love to put effort and money behind
the promotion of your record if we could show them that.
Aww, come on, you know I do not write my own songs. You
should know the answer to that better than me. Heck, there's
so many long words in these songs, I don't even understand
most of 'em.
What about a song about Drugs, Britney. If you could write one good song about drugs
it would really help out some of our associates who work in Organized Crime.
You see, they generate the cash that they use to pay Payola cash payoffs to
radio stations programmers from selling drugs on our streets. If you could
a write song that glamorizes drug sales and/or drug use, it could really help their business.
They would not forget such a favor...
My manager told me you already have those black guys who make hip-hop records
doing that already. Why would my writing a song about Drugs help this any further ?
Simple, Britney. You records are purchased by a different demographic from
those who purchase hip-hop records. Our associates in Organized Crime really
would love you to write a good song about drugs or associate publicly with people
who use and possess drugs. They would 'promote' the heck out of any record
which contained such a song...
Well, I will think about how I can help your Organized Crime friends promote drug sales.
Why don't you talk to those people who write my songs.
Ok, we will...
================================================
Stay tuned for more entertainment business parody.
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexuals and The Payola controlled Entertainment Business #2 [message #78368 ] |
Mi, 13 Juli 2005 02:34 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexuals and The Payola controlled Entertainment Business #2 [message #78445 ] |
Mi, 13 Juli 2005 19:34 |
|
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:04:41 -0700, "John Shocked"
<jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>Why do Hollywood Homosexuals and homosexuals in general
>have such a resentment to marriage ?
They don't. That is why they are trying to change the laws to allow
same-sex marriages.
John Shocked, are you "shocked" by how simple the answer to your
question really was, yet it took someone else to answer it for you?
Mark Ferrante
Click here eveyday to feed a rescued animal:
http://www.theanimalrescuesite.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexuals and The Payola controlled Entertainment Business #2 [message #78453 ] |
Mi, 13 Juli 2005 20:49 |
|
"M. FERRANTE" <manthonyferrante [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message news:e0kad11cmm369nh361mocc8uug7902gjoe [at] 4ax.com...
> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:04:41 -0700, "John Shocked"
> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>Why do Hollywood Homosexuals and homosexuals in general
>>have such a resentment to marriage ?
> They don't. That is why they are trying to change the laws to allow
> same-sex marriages.
> John Shocked, are you "shocked" by how simple the answer to your
> question really was, yet it took someone else to answer it for you?
> Mark Ferrante
Homosexuals are not seriously attempting to marry. Very few marriages
have actually occurred in places where it has become legal temporarily.
Homosexual organizations simply are seeking to devalue marriage into
an association with a sex act, rather than child procreation and nurturing,
and that is what has forced the heterosexuals pass statutes named
"The Defense Of Marriage Act" and State amendments to ban
homosexual marriage and even civil unions, in some States.
And this strategy comes out in the treatment of marriage in Hollywood.
I cannot remember the last time I saw a monogamous married couple
in starring roles in a Hollywood movie.
And 5 minute long fake marriages of Hollywood personalities in sometimes
midnight services in Las Vegas have become a major marketing tool in
Hollywood.
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexuals and The Payola controlled Entertainment Business #2 [message #78458 ] |
Mi, 13 Juli 2005 21:37 |
|
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:49:07 -0700, "John Shocked"
<jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>"M. FERRANTE" <manthonyferrante [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message news:e0kad11cmm369nh361mocc8uug7902gjoe [at] 4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:04:41 -0700, "John Shocked"
>> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>Why do Hollywood Homosexuals and homosexuals in general
>>>have such a resentment to marriage ?
>> They don't. That is why they are trying to change the laws to allow
>> same-sex marriages.
>> John Shocked, are you "shocked" by how simple the answer to your
>> question really was, yet it took someone else to answer it for you?
>> Mark Ferrante
>
>Homosexuals are not seriously attempting to marry. Very few marriages
>have actually occurred in places where it has become legal temporarily.
However, in places where it is legal permanently, such as Canada, many
gay marriages have taken place. You are wrong.
>Homosexual organizations simply are seeking to devalue marriage into
>an association with a sex act, rather than child procreation and nurturing,
>and that is what has forced the heterosexuals pass statutes named
>"The Defense Of Marriage Act" and State amendments to ban
>homosexual marriage and even civil unions, in some States.
Bullshit. The ones focused on a 'sex act' are the ones opposing gay
marriage. They are the ones with the constant obsession with sex.
Your child procreation argument is ignored, as it is entirely
irrelevant to the subject of whether marriage should be allowed or
not.
No one was 'forced' to pass DOMA. It's a relic of prejudice. Marriage
needs to be defended from heterosexuals first.
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexuals and The Payola controlled Entertainment Business #2 [message #78459 ] |
Mi, 13 Juli 2005 22:05 |
|
"Adam H." <adam [at] mailinator.com> wrote in message news:f7rad1hgqjpdpmmjn3nnib6c43ufguif32 [at] 4ax.com...
> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:49:07 -0700, "John Shocked"
> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>"M. FERRANTE" <manthonyferrante [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message news:e0kad11cmm369nh361mocc8uug7902gjoe [at] 4ax.com...
>>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:04:41 -0700, "John Shocked"
>>> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>Why do Hollywood Homosexuals and homosexuals in general
>>>>have such a resentment to marriage ?
>>> They don't. That is why they are trying to change the laws to allow
>>> same-sex marriages.
>>> John Shocked, are you "shocked" by how simple the answer to your
>>> question really was, yet it took someone else to answer it for you?
>>> Mark Ferrante
>>Homosexuals are not seriously attempting to marry. Very few marriages
>>have actually occurred in places where it has become legal temporarily.
> However, in places where it is legal permanently, such as Canada, many
> gay marriages have taken place. You are wrong.
They just passed the law in Canada 2 weeks ago. How can you make a
judgment on these numbers after just 2 weeks.
>>Homosexual organizations simply are seeking to devalue marriage into
>>an association with a sex act, rather than child procreation and nurturing,
>>and that is what has forced the heterosexuals pass statutes named
>>"The Defense Of Marriage Act" and State amendments to ban
>>homosexual marriage and even civil unions, in some States.
> Bullshit. The ones focused on a 'sex act' are the ones opposing gay
> marriage. They are the ones with the constant obsession with sex.
> Your child procreation argument is ignored, as it is entirely
> irrelevant to the subject of whether marriage should be allowed or
> not.
> No one was 'forced' to pass DOMA. It's a relic of prejudice. Marriage
> needs to be defended from heterosexuals first.
This is an absurd statement. Certainly heterosexual marriage should improve
but a lot of this damage to marriage is coming out of Hollywood.
It is rare to ever see a monogamous marriage portrayed in any content
coming out of Hollywood.
And characterizing all the millions of people who voted against the homosexual
agenda in November 2004 as engaged in prejudice is simply ridiculous.
One could say that about all laws against murder, drug use/sales, bestiality etc.
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: Hollywood Homosexuals and The Payola controlled Entertainment Business #2 [message #78465 ] |
Mi, 13 Juli 2005 22:53 |
|
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 13:05:08 -0700, "John Shocked"
<jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>"Adam H." <adam [at] mailinator.com> wrote in message news:f7rad1hgqjpdpmmjn3nnib6c43ufguif32 [at] 4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 11:49:07 -0700, "John Shocked"
>> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>"M. FERRANTE" <manthonyferrante [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message news:e0kad11cmm369nh361mocc8uug7902gjoe [at] 4ax.com...
>>>> On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 17:04:41 -0700, "John Shocked"
>>>> <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>Why do Hollywood Homosexuals and homosexuals in general
>>>>>have such a resentment to marriage ?
>>>> They don't. That is why they are trying to change the laws to allow
>>>> same-sex marriages.
>>>> John Shocked, are you "shocked" by how simple the answer to your
>>>> question really was, yet it took someone else to answer it for you?
>>>> Mark Ferrante
>>>Homosexuals are not seriously attempting to marry. Very few marriages
>>>have actually occurred in places where it has become legal temporarily.
>> However, in places where it is legal permanently, such as Canada, many
>> gay marriages have taken place. You are wrong.
>
>They just passed the law in Canada 2 weeks ago. How can you make a
>judgment on these numbers after just 2 weeks.
You obviously don't know what's going on. You might want to look up
how long it's been legal and happening in Ontario, or Quebec.
>
>>>Homosexual organizations simply are seeking to devalue marriage into
>>>an association with a sex act, rather than child procreation and nurturing,
>>>and that is what has forced the heterosexuals pass statutes named
>>>"The Defense Of Marriage Act" and State amendments to ban
>>>homosexual marriage and even civil unions, in some States.
>> Bullshit. The ones focused on a 'sex act' are the ones opposing gay
>> marriage. They are the ones with the constant obsession with sex.
>> Your child procreation argument is ignored, as it is entirely
>> irrelevant to the subject of whether marriage should be allowed or
>> not.
>> No one was 'forced' to pass DOMA. It's a relic of prejudice. Marriage
>> needs to be defended from heterosexuals first.
>
>This is an absurd statement. Certainly heterosexual marriage should improve
>but a lot of this damage to marriage is coming out of Hollywood.
My, you are looking to blame anyone but the ones responsible, aren't
you?
>It is rare to ever see a monogamous marriage portrayed in any content
>coming out of Hollywood.
So what? Guess what - it's not Hollywood's responsibility to safeguard
marriage, it's the responsibility of those who get married. If they're
so spineless that movies inform their values, then they probably
shouldn't be married in the first place, they obviously don't have the
character for it.
Hollywood shows what people want to see. Marriage isn't 'damaged'
because of what comes out of Hollywood - it's the other way around.
Marriage is 'damaged' because of those without the integrity to keep
it.
>And characterizing all the millions of people who voted against the homosexual
>agenda in November 2004 as engaged in prejudice is simply ridiculous.
What else would you call a willful and deliberate denial of basic
rights? Should I have said 'bigotry'?
>One could say that about all laws against murder, drug use/sales, bestiality etc.
So, being a homosexual is like being a murderer? Your prejudice is
obvious.
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Mi Mai 23 15:57:02 CEST 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 4,60228 Sekunden |
