| Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303448] |
Mi, 19 Juli 2006 08:53 |
|
"CR" is too general... how are we to differentiate between Casino Royale
'54, Casino Royale '67, and Casino Royale '06?
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303455 ] |
Mi, 19 Juli 2006 10:42 |
|
Steve Worek schreef:
> "CR" is too general... how are we to differentiate between Casino Royale
> '54, Casino Royale '67, and Casino Royale '06?
>
>
CR1, 2 and 3?
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303462 ] |
Mi, 19 Juli 2006 12:47 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303463 ] |
Mi, 19 Juli 2006 13:13 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303484 ] |
Mi, 19 Juli 2006 16:45 |
|
I say who gives a shit about the earlier Casino Royales.
"Steve Worek" <wa3dhb1 [at] verizon.net> wrote in message
news:KFkvg.14747$A8.8466 [at] trnddc02...
> "CR" is too general... how are we to differentiate between Casino Royale
> '54, Casino Royale '67, and Casino Royale '06?
>
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303494 ] |
Mi, 19 Juli 2006 17:26 |
|
"Matt" <rebel_144 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:AArvg.184$1Z5.177 [at] twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>I say who gives a shit about the earlier Casino Royales.
>
>
> "Steve Worek" <wa3dhb1 [at] verizon.net> wrote in message
> news:KFkvg.14747$A8.8466 [at] trnddc02...
>> "CR" is too general... how are we to differentiate between Casino Royale
>> '54, Casino Royale '67, and Casino Royale '06?
Howabout OCR - Official Casino Royale, but I agree "who gives a shit about
the previous cack"
BC - Big Craigie
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303498 ] |
Mi, 19 Juli 2006 17:49 |
|
Steve Worek wrote:
> "CR" is too general... how are we to differentiate between Casino Royale
> '54, Casino Royale '67, and Casino Royale '06?
>
>
I've been posting CR06, but we all know we're not talking about the
other two
--
Check out my new BLOG
Its a work in progress
http://computerpast.blogspot.com/
Also check out our sales page(s)
http://bondtime.tripod.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303499 ] |
Mi, 19 Juli 2006 17:50 |
|
mikey D wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> CR, CR Classic, and CR Lite?
>
>
>
> René van den Abeelen wrote in message
> <44bdf079$0$31653$e4fe514c [at] news.xs4all.nl>...
>
>>Steve Worek schreef:
>>
>>>"CR" is too general... how are we to differentiate between Casino Royale
>>>'54, Casino Royale '67, and Casino Royale '06?
>>>
>>>
>>
>>CR1, 2 and 3?
>
>
>
CR06=CRLETDOWN
--
Check out my new BLOG
Its a work in progress
http://computerpast.blogspot.com/
Also check out our sales page(s)
http://bondtime.tripod.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303509 ] |
Mi, 19 Juli 2006 19:29 |
|
VINCE wrote:
> CR06=CRLETDOWN
I remember the good ol' days when people used to actually *see* the film
before engaging in the intellectually stimulating "xxxx ROCKS!" / "xxxx
SUCKS!!" newsgroup debates.
*sigh*
--
==007===
“My dear girl, there are some things that just aren't done, such as
drinking Dom Perignon '53 above a temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit.
That's as bad as putting a secret agent in a gorilla suit.”
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303515 ] |
Mi, 19 Juli 2006 19:48 |
|
"VINCE" <Holvbphoto [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
news:gysvg.27$FI7.5 [at] fe10.lga...
> mikey D wrote:
>
>> x-no-archive: yes
>>
>> CR, CR Classic, and CR Lite?
>>
>>
>>
>> René van den Abeelen wrote in message
>> <44bdf079$0$31653$e4fe514c [at] news.xs4all.nl>...
>>
>>>Steve Worek schreef:
>>>
>>>>"CR" is too general... how are we to differentiate between Casino Royale
>>>>'54, Casino Royale '67, and Casino Royale '06?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>CR1, 2 and 3?
>>
>>
>>
> CR06=CRLETDOWN
>
I thought CRLetdown was Casino Royale '67?
Thanks,
Mike
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303518 ] |
Mi, 19 Juli 2006 20:52 |
|
Paul Clarke wrote:
>
> VINCE wrote:
>
>> CR06=CRLETDOWN
>
>
>
> I remember the good ol' days when people used to actually *see* the film
> before engaging in the intellectually stimulating "xxxx ROCKS!" / "xxxx
> SUCKS!!" newsgroup debates.
>
> *sigh*
>
Yeah I remember the good old days as well where we had
a Bond actor who was something to look at.
You see bottom line I'm not going to fall behind
King Michael, and Queen Barbara. That whatever they do
is alright Cubby must be rolling in his grave.
--
Check out my new BLOG
Its a work in progress
http://computerpast.blogspot.com/
Also check out our sales page(s)
http://bondtime.tripod.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303519 ] |
Mi, 19 Juli 2006 20:52 |
|
MikeSo wrote:
> "VINCE" <Holvbphoto [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:gysvg.27$FI7.5 [at] fe10.lga...
>
>>mikey D wrote:
>>
>>
>>>x-no-archive: yes
>>>
>>>CR, CR Classic, and CR Lite?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>René van den Abeelen wrote in message
>>><44bdf079$0$31653$e4fe514c [at] news.xs4all.nl>...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Steve Worek schreef:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"CR" is too general... how are we to differentiate between Casino Royale
>>>>>'54, Casino Royale '67, and Casino Royale '06?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>CR1, 2 and 3?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>CR06=CRLETDOWN
>>
>
>
> I thought CRLetdown was Casino Royale '67?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
>
This is part II
--
Check out my new BLOG
Its a work in progress
http://computerpast.blogspot.com/
Also check out our sales page(s)
http://bondtime.tripod.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303571 ] |
Do, 20 Juli 2006 06:38 |
|
On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:45:52 GMT, "Matt" <rebel_144 [at] hotmail.com>
wrote:
>I say who gives a shit about the earlier Casino Royales.
>
>
>"Steve Worek" <wa3dhb1 [at] verizon.net> wrote in message
>news:KFkvg.14747$A8.8466 [at] trnddc02...
>> "CR" is too general... how are we to differentiate between Casino Royale
>> '54, Casino Royale '67, and Casino Royale '06?
I agree. Or, more to the point, I think we'll say
1. "CR" (meaning 2006),
2. "The 60s CR" or "CR 67," meaning that one, and
3. (something like) "the TV Casino Royale from the 50s."
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303572 ] |
Do, 20 Juli 2006 06:46 |
|
"dgates" <dgates [at] spamlinkline.com> wrote in message
news:g32ub2tdoudf1e8dt70iu9g0s5c4k23lid [at] 4ax.com...
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:45:52 GMT, "Matt" <rebel_144 [at] hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>I say who gives a shit about the earlier Casino Royales.
>>
>>
>>"Steve Worek" <wa3dhb1 [at] verizon.net> wrote in message
>>news:KFkvg.14747$A8.8466 [at] trnddc02...
>>> "CR" is too general... how are we to differentiate between Casino Royale
>>> '54, Casino Royale '67, and Casino Royale '06?
>
>
> I agree. Or, more to the point, I think we'll say
>
> 1. "CR" (meaning 2006),
> 2. "The 60s CR" or "CR 67," meaning that one, and
> 3. (something like) "the TV Casino Royale from the 50s."
How about:
1. "CR" (meaning the 2006 version)
2. "CRap" (meaning the '67 version)
3. CRud (meaning the U.s. Debacle)
cheers
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303574 ] |
Do, 20 Juli 2006 08:46 |
|
I'd have to agree... nothing can blow as bad as the David Niven version.
Hell, I don't even know what that movie's about.
"VINCE" <Holvbphoto [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
news:jdvvg.17$An.7 [at] fe11.lga...
> MikeSo wrote:
>
>> "VINCE" <Holvbphoto [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
>> news:gysvg.27$FI7.5 [at] fe10.lga...
>>
>>>mikey D wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>x-no-archive: yes
>>>>
>>>>CR, CR Classic, and CR Lite?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>René van den Abeelen wrote in message
>>>><44bdf079$0$31653$e4fe514c [at] news.xs4all.nl>...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Steve Worek schreef:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"CR" is too general... how are we to differentiate between Casino
>>>>>>Royale
>>>>>>'54, Casino Royale '67, and Casino Royale '06?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>CR1, 2 and 3?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>CR06=CRLETDOWN
>>>
>>
>>
>> I thought CRLetdown was Casino Royale '67?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Mike
> This is part II
>
> --
> Check out my new BLOG
> Its a work in progress
>
>
> http://computerpast.blogspot.com/
>
>
> Also check out our sales page(s)
>
> http://bondtime.tripod.com/
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303575 ] |
Do, 20 Juli 2006 08:47 |
|
The '54 one was quite good...
"Big Craigie" <bigcraigieyourclothes13 [at] yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:44be41e4$0$23464$88260bb3 [at] free.teranews.com...
>
> "Matt" <rebel_144 [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:AArvg.184$1Z5.177 [at] twister.nyroc.rr.com...
>>I say who gives a shit about the earlier Casino Royales.
>>
>>
>> "Steve Worek" <wa3dhb1 [at] verizon.net> wrote in message
>> news:KFkvg.14747$A8.8466 [at] trnddc02...
>>> "CR" is too general... how are we to differentiate between Casino Royale
>>> '54, Casino Royale '67, and Casino Royale '06?
> Howabout OCR - Official Casino Royale, but I agree "who gives a shit about
> the previous cack"
>
> BC - Big Craigie
>
>
> --
> Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
>
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303584 ] |
Do, 20 Juli 2006 17:25 |
|
On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:46:32 GMT, "Blofelds Cat" <nospam [at] myinbox.com>
wrote:
>
>"dgates" <dgates [at] spamlinkline.com> wrote in message
>news:g32ub2tdoudf1e8dt70iu9g0s5c4k23lid [at] 4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:45:52 GMT, "Matt" <rebel_144 [at] hotmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>I say who gives a shit about the earlier Casino Royales.
>>>
>>>
>>>"Steve Worek" <wa3dhb1 [at] verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>news:KFkvg.14747$A8.8466 [at] trnddc02...
>>>> "CR" is too general... how are we to differentiate between Casino Royale
>>>> '54, Casino Royale '67, and Casino Royale '06?
>>
>>
>> I agree. Or, more to the point, I think we'll say
>>
>> 1. "CR" (meaning 2006),
>> 2. "The 60s CR" or "CR 67," meaning that one, and
>> 3. (something like) "the TV Casino Royale from the 50s."
>
>How about:
>
>1. "CR" (meaning the 2006 version)
>
>2. "CRap" (meaning the '67 version)
>
>3. CRud (meaning the U.s. Debacle)
Funny :-)
I'd like CR-AP more if we could claim that "AP" was the initials of
something related to the 1967 version.
For #3, "CR-TV" seems to say it all, but I don't think we discuss that
version enough to need an acronym.
I don't see any threads about the Bond-related confusion as to whether
DN means Dr. No or David Niven :-)
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303602 ] |
Fr, 21 Juli 2006 01:05 |
|
"dgates" <dgates [at] spamlinkline.com> wrote in message
news:uv7vb21r1bde498r47mreg1m95iced2m9l [at] 4ax.com...
> On Thu, 20 Jul 2006 04:46:32 GMT, "Blofelds Cat" <nospam [at] myinbox.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>"dgates" <dgates [at] spamlinkline.com> wrote in message
>>news:g32ub2tdoudf1e8dt70iu9g0s5c4k23lid [at] 4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 19 Jul 2006 14:45:52 GMT, "Matt" <rebel_144 [at] hotmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>I say who gives a shit about the earlier Casino Royales.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>"Steve Worek" <wa3dhb1 [at] verizon.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:KFkvg.14747$A8.8466 [at] trnddc02...
>>>>> "CR" is too general... how are we to differentiate between Casino
>>>>> Royale
>>>>> '54, Casino Royale '67, and Casino Royale '06?
>>>
>>>
>>> I agree. Or, more to the point, I think we'll say
>>>
>>> 1. "CR" (meaning 2006),
>>> 2. "The 60s CR" or "CR 67," meaning that one, and
>>> 3. (something like) "the TV Casino Royale from the 50s."
>>
>>How about:
>>
>>1. "CR" (meaning the 2006 version)
>>
>>2. "CRap" (meaning the '67 version)
>>
>>3. CRud (meaning the U.s. Debacle)
>
> Funny :-)
>
> I'd like CR-AP more if we could claim that "AP" was the initials of
> something related to the 1967 version.
Artless Producer?
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303617 ] |
Fr, 21 Juli 2006 02:16 |
|
CR: this EON productions version
CR '67: the spoof
CRTV: the television show
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303619 ] |
Fr, 21 Juli 2006 02:31 |
|
"The Shadow" <miehls [at] bright.net> wrote in message
news:uK-dnSby9OFhgV3ZnZ2dnUVZ_u-dnZ2d [at] bright.net...
> CRTV: the television show
or, doubly:
CRTV - Cathode Ray Tube Version
(just being a smartarse)
cheers.
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303621 ] |
Fr, 21 Juli 2006 02:37 |
|
Blofelds Cat wrote:
> CRTV - Cathode Ray Tube Version
>
> (just being a smartarse)
Yeah, but unlike most people who could answer to that description,
you're more smart than arse.
Marginally ;-)
Best
Phil
|
|
|
| Re: Casino Royale acronym confusion [message #303685 ] |
Sa, 22 Juli 2006 06:34 |
|
At 6:53am -0000, 07/19/06, Steve Worek <wa3dhb1 [at] verizon.net> wrote:
>"CR" is too general... how are we to differentiate between Casino Royale
>'54, Casino Royale '67, and Casino Royale '06?
I vote CR-CKF, to emphasize who was at fault.
Just glanced at Charles K. Feldman's entry at IMDb. Did you know he produced
two of the adaptations of Tennessee Williams plays, including the much
beloved "Streetcar Named Desire"? Yes, the scripts were toned down, but the
acting was generally terrific.
He also produced the classic '60's romp, What's New Pussycat? Fun, but
dated.
The guy had talent at one time.
I did not know that CR was his last production and that he died in 1968.
|
|
|
