Sprinkler Systems Uhaul move Lawn care Roses and trees Ford Parts Chrysler Parts Lake Powell New IPod Touch Apps New IPhone Apps IPhone Apps IPad Information IPad Apps Android APPS Android Games APPS Android Systems Android Tablets APPS and Beyond Smartphone Apps Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools Tablet PC Car Sharing Car Leasing Tabler Pc Fly Fishing Toyota Cars Vacation Rentals Stock market NYSE SSE Stock Freight & Shipping News Gluten Lactose Gout My Coupon Life Campgrounds Check Outdoor Kitchen Design and Redoo Bath Remodeling Palm Springs Las Vegas Vacation Tipps Lake Powell Boating Homes for lease Electric and green Car Blog Pearls and diamonds Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
Reader


[Suche]  [Administrator]  [Hinweise zum Reader]  [Startseite]
Miscellaneous / Verschiedenes » alt.fan.james-bond » "James Bond will return in RISICO"
"James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303434] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 03:01
Mac  
Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
--
--Mac
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303436 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 03:21
phil.gerrard1  
Mac wrote:

> Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?

Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next, it's
even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested in the
upcoming film.

Best

Phil
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303438 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 05:20
WQ  
phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
> Mac wrote:
>
> > Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
>
> Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next, it's
> even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested in the
> upcoming film.

--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
that hasn't been finished yet. You sure you guys aren't twins? In the
meantime, digest the script and review properly - am looking forward to
the bashing sessions ahead.

>
> Best
>
> Phil
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303445 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 06:51
WQ  
WQ wrote:
> phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
> > Mac wrote:
> >
> > > Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
> >
> > Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next, it's
> > even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested in the
> > upcoming film.
>
> --- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
> that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
> that hasn't been finished yet. You sure you guys aren't twins? In the
> meantime, digest the script and review properly - am looking forward to
> the bashing sessions ahead.

--- Oh, and while we're creaming, how about:

James Bond will return in The Hildebrand Rarity

to wrap up Craig's trilogy?

>
> >
> > Best
> >
> > Phil
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303446 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 07:11
Vince  
WQ wrote:
> WQ wrote:
>
>>phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
>>
>>>Mac wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
>>>
>>>Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next, it's
>>>even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested in the
>>>upcoming film.
>>
>>--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
>>that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
>>that hasn't been finished yet. You sure you guys aren't twins? In the
>>meantime, digest the script and review properly - am looking forward to
>>the bashing sessions ahead.
>
>
> --- Oh, and while we're creaming, how about:
>
> James Bond will return in The Hildebrand Rarity
>
> to wrap up Craig's trilogy?
>
>
>>>Best
>>>
>>>Phil
>
>
HA!

Are you so sure he'll get that far?

CR06 might stink up so bad that EON will pay off DC and that'll be that.

--
Check out my new BLOG
Its a work in progress


http://computerpast.blogspot.com/


Also check out our sales page(s)

http://bondtime.tripod.com/
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303457 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 11:22
Mac  
WQ wrote:

> phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
>> Mac wrote:
>>
>>> Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
>>
>> Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
>> it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
>> in the upcoming film.
>
> --- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
> that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
> that hasn't been finished yet.

I was "creaming my pants" over the prospect of the next film being
announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
"old days" you keep harping on about?
--
--Mac
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303461 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 12:20
Blofelds Cat  
"Mac" <see.mac [at] SPAMLESSvirgin.net> wrote in message
news:4i6butF2bi1vU1 [at] individual.net...
> WQ wrote:
>
>> phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
>>> Mac wrote:
>>>
>>>> Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
>>>
>>> Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
>>> it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
>>> in the upcoming film.
>>
>> --- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
>> that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
>> that hasn't been finished yet.
>
> I was "creaming my pants" over the prospect of the next film being
> announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
> "old days" you keep harping on about?

Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, "The End of (insert current
title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned next film
here)". It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick to the proposed
titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved Me and Octopussy).
It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's the first time since The
Living Daylights to feature an original Fleming title.

It's a bit like on TV when they say, "tune in next week...", gives you
something almost tangible to look forward to.

Just having, "James Bond Will Return" is redundant 'cos its a foregone
conclusion.

I'm hoping to one day see, "The End of (film title here) But James Bond Will
Return in Quantum of Solace" (which is a superb title).

cheers
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303464 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 14:39
pussfeller  
Blofelds Cat wrote:
> "Mac" <see.mac [at] SPAMLESSvirgin.net> wrote in message
> news:4i6butF2bi1vU1 [at] individual.net...
> > WQ wrote:
> >
> >> phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
> >>> Mac wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
> >>>
> >>> Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
> >>> it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
> >>> in the upcoming film.
> >>
> >> --- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
> >> that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
> >> that hasn't been finished yet.
> >
> > I was "creaming my pants" over the prospect of the next film being
> > announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
> > "old days" you keep harping on about?
>
> Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, "The End of (insert current
> title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned next film
> here)". It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick to the proposed
> titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved Me and Octopussy).
> It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's the first time since The
> Living Daylights to feature an original Fleming title.
>
> It's a bit like on TV when they say, "tune in next week...", gives you
> something almost tangible to look forward to.
>
> Just having, "James Bond Will Return" is redundant 'cos its a foregone
> conclusion.
>
> I'm hoping to one day see, "The End of (film title here) But James Bond Will
> Return in Quantum of Solace" (which is a superb title).
>
> cheers

I like it too CAT but if the USA market wasn't expected to know what
"REVOKED" meant, how the hell are we gonna know what "QUANTUM OF
SOLACE" means, even less, are we gonna know how to spell it?
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303467 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 15:27
WQ  
Mac wrote:
> WQ wrote:
>
> > phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
> >> Mac wrote:
> >>
> >>> Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
> >>
> >> Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
> >> it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
> >> in the upcoming film.
> >
> > --- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
> > that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
> > that hasn't been finished yet.
>
> I was "creaming my pants" over the prospect of the next film being
> announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
> "old days" you keep harping on about?

--- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in the
end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now that's
creaming Big Time.

> --
> --Mac
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303470 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 16:16
Mac  
WQ wrote:

> --- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in the
> end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now that's
> creaming Big Time.

As opposed to frothing at the mouth over the colour of a man's hair, I
suppose it is...
--
--Mac
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303473 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 16:28
WQ  
Mac wrote:
> WQ wrote:
>
> > --- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in the
> > end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now that's
> > creaming Big Time.
>
> As opposed to frothing at the mouth over the colour of a man's hair, I
> suppose it is...

--- Cream of a different foam.


> --
> --Mac
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303475 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 16:32
Mac  
pussfeller [at] cableone.net wrote:

>> Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, "The End of (insert
>> current title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned
>> next film here)". It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick
>> to the proposed titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who
>> Loved Me and Octopussy). It's especially fitting for Casino Royale
>> as it's the first time since The Living Daylights to feature an
>> original Fleming title.
>>
>> It's a bit like on TV when they say, "tune in next week...", gives
>> you something almost tangible to look forward to.
>>
>> Just having, "James Bond Will Return" is redundant 'cos its a
>> foregone conclusion.
>>
>> I'm hoping to one day see, "The End of (film title here) But James
>> Bond Will Return in Quantum of Solace" (which is a superb title).
>>
>> cheers
>
> I like it too CAT but if the USA market wasn't expected to know what
> "REVOKED" meant, how the hell are we gonna know what "QUANTUM OF
> SOLACE" means, even less, are we gonna know how to spell it?

LOL I agree with BC, it is an excellent title; LICENCE REVOKED wasn't.
--
--Mac
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303477 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 16:35
Mac  
WQ wrote:

> Mac wrote:
>> WQ wrote:
>>
>>> --- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in
>>> the end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now
>>> that's creaming Big Time.
>>
>> As opposed to frothing at the mouth over the colour of a man's hair,
>> I suppose it is...
>
> --- Cream of a different foam.

Bitter to the taste.
--
--Mac
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303482 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 16:45
WQ  
Mac wrote:
> WQ wrote:
>
> > Mac wrote:
> >> WQ wrote:
> >>
> >>> --- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in
> >>> the end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now
> >>> that's creaming Big Time.
> >>
> >> As opposed to frothing at the mouth over the colour of a man's hair,
> >> I suppose it is...
> >
> > --- Cream of a different foam.
>
> Bitter to the taste.

--- I wouldn't touch that with a 10 ft. pole.

> --
> --Mac
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303486 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 16:53
Paul Clarke  
You know, WQ, you're right. Instead of getting excited at the prospect
of some real quality and excitement in the Bond film series, I should
just sit back and sneer. It's totally uncool to be an enthusiast, and
being an optimist is just not on. I'm just gonna put on my smoking
jacket, slump in my comfy chair with my scotch, and bitch and sneer and
piss and moan about the general badness of life and how anybody who
doesn't feel the same way is an idiot.

I'm sure my life will improve greatly.

*SNEER*

WQ wrote:
> Mac wrote:
>
>>WQ wrote:
>>
>>
>>>phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>Mac wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
>>>>
>>>>Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
>>>>it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
>>>>in the upcoming film.
>>>
>>>--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
>>>that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
>>>that hasn't been finished yet.
>>
>>I was "creaming my pants" over the prospect of the next film being
>>announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
>>"old days" you keep harping on about?
>
>
> --- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in the
> end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now that's
> creaming Big Time.
>
>
>>--
>>--Mac
>
>

--
==007===
“My dear girl, there are some things that just aren't done, such as
drinking Dom Perignon '53 above a temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit.
That's as bad as putting a secret agent in a gorilla suit.”
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303493 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 17:22
youngbond  
Here's a roundup of Bond 22 (Risico? -that would be great) news and
rumor.

http://web.mac.com/zencato/iWeb/Young_Bond/News/3CEBCAC2-F11 4-4A37-B210-6AE485A15B2E.html
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303495 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 17:28
WQ  
Paul Clarke wrote:
> You know, WQ, you're right. Instead of getting excited at the prospect
> of some real quality and excitement in the Bond film series, I should
> just sit back and sneer. It's totally uncool to be an enthusiast, and
> being an optimist is just not on. I'm just gonna put on my smoking
> jacket, slump in my comfy chair with my scotch, and bitch and sneer and
> piss and moan about the general badness of life and how anybody who
> doesn't feel the same way is an idiot.
>
> I'm sure my life will improve greatly.
>
> *SNEER*

--- There you go, that's the way to do it. Now just think of how much
more thrilled you'll be with the movie if after all this sneering CR
proves to be a terrific picture. It's in the expectation of any movie
being terrific that you actually set yourself up to be more often
disappointed than not. That's usually the price of optimism:
disappointment. But like I said, I've read the script and this will be
no FRWL. Downgrade it more to FYEO or TLD at best.

>
> WQ wrote:
> > Mac wrote:
> >
> >>WQ wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Mac wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
> >>>>
> >>>>Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
> >>>>it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
> >>>>in the upcoming film.
> >>>
> >>>--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
> >>>that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
> >>>that hasn't been finished yet.
> >>
> >>I was "creaming my pants" over the prospect of the next film being
> >>announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
> >>"old days" you keep harping on about?
> >
> >
> > --- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in the
> > end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now that's
> > creaming Big Time.
> >
> >
> >>--
> >>--Mac
> >
> >
>
> --
> ==007===
> "My dear girl, there are some things that just aren't done, such as
> drinking Dom Perignon '53 above a temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit.
> That's as bad as putting a secret agent in a gorilla suit."
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303496 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 17:33
Mac  
WQ wrote:

> --- There you go, that's the way to do it. Now just think of how much
> more thrilled you'll be with the movie if after all this sneering CR
> proves to be a terrific picture. It's in the expectation of any movie
> being terrific that you actually set yourself up to be more often
> disappointed than not. That's usually the price of optimism:
> disappointment. But like I said, I've read the script and this will
> be no FRWL. Downgrade it more to FYEO or TLD at best.

I've not read it yet, but this is quite encouraging. Coming from
you, more so.
--
--Mac
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303497 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 17:46
Vince  
Blofelds Cat wrote:

> "Mac" <see.mac [at] SPAMLESSvirgin.net> wrote in message
> news:4i6butF2bi1vU1 [at] individual.net...
>
>>WQ wrote:
>>
>>
>>>phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>Mac wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
>>>>
>>>>Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
>>>>it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
>>>>in the upcoming film.
>>>
>>>--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
>>>that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
>>>that hasn't been finished yet.
>>
>>I was "creaming my pants" over the prospect of the next film being
>>announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
>>"old days" you keep harping on about?
>
>
> Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, "The End of (insert current
> title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned next film
> here)". It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick to the proposed
> titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved Me and Octopussy).
> It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's the first time since The
> Living Daylights to feature an original Fleming title.
>
> It's a bit like on TV when they say, "tune in next week...", gives you
> something almost tangible to look forward to.
>
> Just having, "James Bond Will Return" is redundant 'cos its a foregone
> conclusion.
>

Such wasn't the case in 1989


--
Check out my new BLOG
Its a work in progress


http://computerpast.blogspot.com/


Also check out our sales page(s)

http://bondtime.tripod.com/
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303505 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 18:00
WQ  
Mac wrote:
> WQ wrote:
>
> > --- There you go, that's the way to do it. Now just think of how much
> > more thrilled you'll be with the movie if after all this sneering CR
> > proves to be a terrific picture. It's in the expectation of any movie
> > being terrific that you actually set yourself up to be more often
> > disappointed than not. That's usually the price of optimism:
> > disappointment. But like I said, I've read the script and this will
> > be no FRWL. Downgrade it more to FYEO or TLD at best.
>
> I've not read it yet, but this is quite encouraging. Coming from
> you, more so.

--- If downgrading is encouraging, then okay. At least you're happy.

> --
> --Mac
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303508 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 19:26
Mac  
WQ wrote:

> Mac wrote:
>> WQ wrote:
>>
>>> --- There you go, that's the way to do it. Now just think of how
>>> much more thrilled you'll be with the movie if after all this
>>> sneering CR proves to be a terrific picture. It's in the
>>> expectation of any movie being terrific that you actually set
>>> yourself up to be more often disappointed than not. That's usually
>>> the price of optimism: disappointment. But like I said, I've read
>>> the script and this will be no FRWL. Downgrade it more to FYEO or
>>> TLD at best.
>>
>> I've not read it yet, but this is quite encouraging. Coming from
>> you, more so.
>
> --- If downgrading is encouraging, then okay. At least you're happy.

Only as far as you're concerned, because you've been negative from
the start. I happen to like FOR YOUR EYES ONLY and THE LIVING
DAYLIGHTS, but you never watch them; You'd rather watch DIAMONDS
ARE FOREVER and YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE.

Me? I'll wait to decide if I am happy November 17th.
--
--Mac
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303512 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 19:39
Paul Clarke  
WQ wrote:
> Paul Clarke wrote:
>
>>You know, WQ, you're right. Instead of getting excited at the prospect
>>of some real quality and excitement in the Bond film series, I should
>>just sit back and sneer. It's totally uncool to be an enthusiast, and
>>being an optimist is just not on. I'm just gonna put on my smoking
>>jacket, slump in my comfy chair with my scotch, and bitch and sneer and
>>piss and moan about the general badness of life and how anybody who
>>doesn't feel the same way is an idiot.
>>
>>I'm sure my life will improve greatly.
>>
>>*SNEER*
>
>
> --- There you go, that's the way to do it. Now just think of how much
> more thrilled you'll be with the movie if after all this sneering CR
> proves to be a terrific picture. It's in the expectation of any movie
> being terrific that you actually set yourself up to be more often
> disappointed than not. That's usually the price of optimism:
> disappointment.

I'm sure I can live with the side-effect of turning into a tiresome,
negative tosspot that never looks forward to anything and no-one wants
to listen to or be around.

--
==007===
“My dear girl, there are some things that just aren't done, such as
drinking Dom Perignon '53 above a temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit.
That's as bad as putting a secret agent in a gorilla suit.”
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303513 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 19:43
WQ  
Mac wrote:
> WQ wrote:
>
> > Mac wrote:
> >> WQ wrote:
> >>
> >>> --- There you go, that's the way to do it. Now just think of how
> >>> much more thrilled you'll be with the movie if after all this
> >>> sneering CR proves to be a terrific picture. It's in the
> >>> expectation of any movie being terrific that you actually set
> >>> yourself up to be more often disappointed than not. That's usually
> >>> the price of optimism: disappointment. But like I said, I've read
> >>> the script and this will be no FRWL. Downgrade it more to FYEO or
> >>> TLD at best.
> >>
> >> I've not read it yet, but this is quite encouraging. Coming from
> >> you, more so.
> >
> > --- If downgrading is encouraging, then okay. At least you're happy.
>
> Only as far as you're concerned, because you've been negative from
> the start. I happen to like FOR YOUR EYES ONLY and THE LIVING
> DAYLIGHTS, but you never watch them; You'd rather watch DIAMONDS
> ARE FOREVER and YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE.
>
> Me? I'll wait to decide if I am happy November 17th.

--- Optimism = disappointment usually; negativity = possibly being very
much surprised. Which would I prefer, being usually disappointed or
possibly very much surprised? Tough call.

FYEO is fine, but Moore as Bond still precludes it from my wanting it
as a DVD, though I'll watch it on the tube whenever it airs. Same goes
for TLD. DAF and YOLT are not top Connery entries, but hey, it's
Connery. Even NSNA qualifies as a keeper, as dull as that film is.
When I get down to it, the deciding factor as to what's a Bond keeper
for me is the actor playing Bond, which actually then outweighs any
real merits of a Bond film itself without the right actor in it. I can
handle Connery in a mediocre Bond film, I can't do the same for the
others. If Lazenby had done more, maybe I'd be able to take him as
well. If CR proves to be a terrific story, Craig as Bond will likely
preclude my wanting to have a DVD copy of it - unless he's
exceptionally fantastic in the role and a credible Bond in his own
right. But that's a tall order for the shortest Bond of all to fill.
Still, as negative as I am, I'm open to being very much surprised. Who
needs the disappointment of optimism?

> --
> --Mac
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303514 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 19:46
WQ  
Paul Clarke wrote:
> WQ wrote:
> > Paul Clarke wrote:
> >
> >>You know, WQ, you're right. Instead of getting excited at the prospect
> >>of some real quality and excitement in the Bond film series, I should
> >>just sit back and sneer. It's totally uncool to be an enthusiast, and
> >>being an optimist is just not on. I'm just gonna put on my smoking
> >>jacket, slump in my comfy chair with my scotch, and bitch and sneer and
> >>piss and moan about the general badness of life and how anybody who
> >>doesn't feel the same way is an idiot.
> >>
> >>I'm sure my life will improve greatly.
> >>
> >>*SNEER*
> >
> >
> > --- There you go, that's the way to do it. Now just think of how much
> > more thrilled you'll be with the movie if after all this sneering CR
> > proves to be a terrific picture. It's in the expectation of any movie
> > being terrific that you actually set yourself up to be more often
> > disappointed than not. That's usually the price of optimism:
> > disappointment.
>
> I'm sure I can live with the side-effect of turning into a tiresome,
> negative tosspot that never looks forward to anything and no-one wants
> to listen to or be around.

--- Speak for yourself. Me, I'm trying to get rid of all these people
wanting to spend too much time with me. What is it about my negativity
that just draws them to me?

>
> --
> ==007===
> "My dear girl, there are some things that just aren't done, such as
> drinking Dom Perignon '53 above a temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit.
> That's as bad as putting a secret agent in a gorilla suit."
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303520 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 20:58
Blofelds Cat  
"WQ" <wq [at] email.com> wrote in message
news:1153320313.633863.179150 [at] p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
>
> Mac wrote:
>> WQ wrote:
>>
>> > Mac wrote:
>> >> WQ wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> --- Wow. Creaming over just a possible next title announcement in
>> >>> the end credits, and an imagined or potential next title too! Now
>> >>> that's creaming Big Time.
>> >>
>> >> As opposed to frothing at the mouth over the colour of a man's hair,
>> >> I suppose it is...
>> >
>> > --- Cream of a different foam.
>>
>> Bitter to the taste.
>
> --- I wouldn't touch that with a 10 ft. pole.

I doubt you'd find a person of such bearing in Poland ...or anywhere else
for that matter.
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303522 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 21:02
Blofelds Cat  
> ...But that's a tall order for the shortest Bond of all to fill.

Maybe a 10ft Pole would be more to your liking.

(sorry, not being adversarial, just couldn't resist squeezing every last
drop out of an appalling pun)
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303524 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 21:09
Blofelds Cat  
"VINCE" <Holvbphoto [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
news:bvsvg.25$FI7.7 [at] fe10.lga...
> Blofelds Cat wrote:
>
>> "Mac" <see.mac [at] SPAMLESSvirgin.net> wrote in message
>> news:4i6butF2bi1vU1 [at] individual.net...
>>
>>>WQ wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Mac wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
>>>>>it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
>>>>>in the upcoming film.
>>>>
>>>>--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
>>>>that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
>>>>that hasn't been finished yet.
>>>
>>>I was "creaming my pants" over the prospect of the next film being
>>>announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
>>>"old days" you keep harping on about?
>>
>>
>> Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, "The End of (insert current
>> title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned next film
>> here)". It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick to the
>> proposed titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved Me and
>> Octopussy). It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's the first
>> time since The Living Daylights to feature an original Fleming title.
>>
>> It's a bit like on TV when they say, "tune in next week...", gives you
>> something almost tangible to look forward to.
>>
>> Just having, "James Bond Will Return" is redundant 'cos its a foregone
>> conclusion.
>>
>
> Such wasn't the case in 1989

Haven't they made a Bond since 1989 then?

Seriously though there was no way any of us could have known, as we watched
the final frames of the last reel of LTK, that a shit-fight was about to
take place. In any case there was never any doubt in my mind that James Bond
would return.

cheers.
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303528 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 21:40
Vince  
Blofelds Cat wrote:
> "VINCE" <Holvbphoto [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:bvsvg.25$FI7.7 [at] fe10.lga...
>
>>Blofelds Cat wrote:
>>
>>
>>>"Mac" <see.mac [at] SPAMLESSvirgin.net> wrote in message
>>>news:4i6butF2bi1vU1 [at] individual.net...
>>>
>>>
>>>>WQ wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Mac wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
>>>>>>it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
>>>>>>in the upcoming film.
>>>>>
>>>>>--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
>>>>>that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
>>>>>that hasn't been finished yet.
>>>>
>>>>I was "creaming my pants" over the prospect of the next film being
>>>>announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
>>>>"old days" you keep harping on about?
>>>
>>>
>>>Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, "The End of (insert current
>>>title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned next film
>>>here)". It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick to the
>>>proposed titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved Me and
>>>Octopussy). It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's the first
>>>time since The Living Daylights to feature an original Fleming title.
>>>
>>>It's a bit like on TV when they say, "tune in next week...", gives you
>>>something almost tangible to look forward to.
>>>
>>>Just having, "James Bond Will Return" is redundant 'cos its a foregone
>>>conclusion.
>>>
>>
>>Such wasn't the case in 1989
>
>
> Haven't they made a Bond since 1989 then?
>
> Seriously though there was no way any of us could have known, as we watched
> the final frames of the last reel of LTK, that a shit-fight was about to
> take place. In any case there was never any doubt in my mind that James Bond
> would return.
>
> cheers.
>
>
True but it was a SIX YEAR wait and now its been a FOUR YEAR wait and
what do we get?...............Oh everyone here knows how I feel!


--
Check out my new BLOG
Its a work in progress


http://computerpast.blogspot.com/


Also check out our sales page(s)

http://bondtime.tripod.com/
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303530 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 21:56
Blofelds Cat  
"VINCE" <Holvbphoto [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
news:wWvvg.35$FI7.19 [at] fe10.lga...
> Blofelds Cat wrote:
>> "VINCE" <Holvbphoto [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
>> news:bvsvg.25$FI7.7 [at] fe10.lga...
>>
>>>Blofelds Cat wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>"Mac" <see.mac [at] SPAMLESSvirgin.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:4i6butF2bi1vU1 [at] individual.net...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>WQ wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Mac wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
>>>>>>>it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
>>>>>>>in the upcoming film.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
>>>>>>that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
>>>>>>that hasn't been finished yet.
>>>>>
>>>>>I was "creaming my pants" over the prospect of the next film being
>>>>>announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
>>>>>"old days" you keep harping on about?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, "The End of (insert current
>>>>title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned next film
>>>>here)". It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick to the
>>>>proposed titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved Me and
>>>>Octopussy). It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's the first
>>>>time since The Living Daylights to feature an original Fleming title.
>>>>
>>>>It's a bit like on TV when they say, "tune in next week...", gives you
>>>>something almost tangible to look forward to.
>>>>
>>>>Just having, "James Bond Will Return" is redundant 'cos its a foregone
>>>>conclusion.
>>>>
>>>
>>>Such wasn't the case in 1989
>>
>>
>> Haven't they made a Bond since 1989 then?
>>
>> Seriously though there was no way any of us could have known, as we
>> watched the final frames of the last reel of LTK, that a shit-fight was
>> about to take place. In any case there was never any doubt in my mind
>> that James Bond would return.
>>
>> cheers.
> True but it was a SIX YEAR wait and now its been a FOUR YEAR wait and what
> do we get?...............Oh everyone here knows how I feel!

Well, I hope you get a pleasant surprise. I'm optimistic even though I have
been sorely disappointed with the last two films.
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303532 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 22:14
Vince  
Blofelds Cat wrote:

> "VINCE" <Holvbphoto [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
> news:wWvvg.35$FI7.19 [at] fe10.lga...
>
>>Blofelds Cat wrote:
>>
>>>"VINCE" <Holvbphoto [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
>>>news:bvsvg.25$FI7.7 [at] fe10.lga...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Blofelds Cat wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>"Mac" <see.mac [at] SPAMLESSvirgin.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:4i6butF2bi1vU1 [at] individual.net...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>WQ wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Mac wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
>>>>>>>>it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
>>>>>>>>in the upcoming film.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
>>>>>>>that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
>>>>>>>that hasn't been finished yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I was "creaming my pants" over the prospect of the next film being
>>>>>>announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like the
>>>>>>"old days" you keep harping on about?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, "The End of (insert current
>>>>>title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned next film
>>>>>here)". It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick to the
>>>>>proposed titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved Me and
>>>>>Octopussy). It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's the first
>>>>>time since The Living Daylights to feature an original Fleming title.
>>>>>
>>>>>It's a bit like on TV when they say, "tune in next week...", gives you
>>>>>something almost tangible to look forward to.
>>>>>
>>>>>Just having, "James Bond Will Return" is redundant 'cos its a foregone
>>>>>conclusion.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Such wasn't the case in 1989
>>>
>>>
>>>Haven't they made a Bond since 1989 then?
>>>
>>>Seriously though there was no way any of us could have known, as we
>>>watched the final frames of the last reel of LTK, that a shit-fight was
>>>about to take place. In any case there was never any doubt in my mind
>>>that James Bond would return.
>>>
>>>cheers.
>>
>>True but it was a SIX YEAR wait and now its been a FOUR YEAR wait and what
>>do we get?...............Oh everyone here knows how I feel!
>
>
> Well, I hope you get a pleasant surprise. I'm optimistic even though I have
> been sorely disappointed with the last two films.
>
>
>
You're missing the point, I DON'T LIKE CRAIG PERIOD.
No more then I liked the last FOUR actors who played Batman.
Need I say more?

--
Check out my new BLOG
Its a work in progress


http://computerpast.blogspot.com/


Also check out our sales page(s)

http://bondtime.tripod.com/
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303536 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 22:22
Paul Clarke  
VINCE wrote:

>>
>> Well, I hope you get a pleasant surprise. I'm optimistic even though I
>> have been sorely disappointed with the last two films.
>>
>>
>>
> You're missing the point, I DON'T LIKE CRAIG PERIOD.
> No more then I liked the last FOUR actors who played Batman.
> Need I say more?

Please don't. My eyes are glazing over.

Anyways, who is this Craig Period chap you're going on about?


--
==007===
“My dear girl, there are some things that just aren't done, such as
drinking Dom Perignon '53 above a temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit.
That's as bad as putting a secret agent in a gorilla suit.”
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303541 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 23:09
Blofelds Cat  
"VINCE" <Holvbphoto [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
news:nqwvg.42$6q.35 [at] fe12.lga...
> Blofelds Cat wrote:
>
>> "VINCE" <Holvbphoto [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
>> news:wWvvg.35$FI7.19 [at] fe10.lga...
>>
>>>Blofelds Cat wrote:
>>>
>>>>"VINCE" <Holvbphoto [at] optonline.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:bvsvg.25$FI7.7 [at] fe10.lga...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Blofelds Cat wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Mac" <see.mac [at] SPAMLESSvirgin.net> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:4i6butF2bi1vU1 [at] individual.net...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>WQ wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Mac wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Anyone else like the sound of (and thought of seeing) that?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Oh, hell, yes - and if CR begs the question of what happens next,
>>>>>>>>>it's even more of an inducement to get excited about and interested
>>>>>>>>>in the upcoming film.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over
>>>>>>>>something
>>>>>>>>that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
>>>>>>>>that hasn't been finished yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I was "creaming my pants" over the prospect of the next film being
>>>>>>>announced in the closing credits like the old days. You know, like
>>>>>>>the
>>>>>>>"old days" you keep harping on about?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Yes, I preferred the optimism engendered by, "The End of (insert
>>>>>>current title here) But James Bond Will Return in (title of planned
>>>>>>next film here)". It's not as if Eon are in any way obliged to stick
>>>>>>to the proposed titles (see Goldfinger, Thunderball, The Spy Who Loved
>>>>>>Me and Octopussy). It's especially fitting for Casino Royale as it's
>>>>>>the first time since The Living Daylights to feature an original
>>>>>>Fleming title.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>It's a bit like on TV when they say, "tune in next week...", gives you
>>>>>>something almost tangible to look forward to.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Just having, "James Bond Will Return" is redundant 'cos its a foregone
>>>>>>conclusion.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Such wasn't the case in 1989
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Haven't they made a Bond since 1989 then?
>>>>
>>>>Seriously though there was no way any of us could have known, as we
>>>>watched the final frames of the last reel of LTK, that a shit-fight was
>>>>about to take place. In any case there was never any doubt in my mind
>>>>that James Bond would return.
>>>>
>>>>cheers.
>>>
>>>True but it was a SIX YEAR wait and now its been a FOUR YEAR wait and
>>>what do we get?...............Oh everyone here knows how I feel!
>>
>>
>> Well, I hope you get a pleasant surprise. I'm optimistic even though I
>> have been sorely disappointed with the last two films.
>>
>>
>>
> You're missing the point, I DON'T LIKE CRAIG PERIOD.
> No more then I liked the last FOUR actors who played Batman.
> Need I say more?

Up until the post to which I am responding, I was unaware that you didn't
like Craig Period. Is Mr Period the next actor to play Batman then?

(The point of the above seemingly flippant paragraph is that one should
never assume that just because YOU know your viewpoint, everyone does. There
was no way that I could miss a point that I could not see in the first
place.)

cheers.
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303542 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 23:10
Blofelds Cat  
"Paul Clarke" <jim_caerleon [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:bwwvg.117468$I61.68961 [at] clgrps13...
> VINCE wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Well, I hope you get a pleasant surprise. I'm optimistic even though I
>>> have been sorely disappointed with the last two films.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> You're missing the point, I DON'T LIKE CRAIG PERIOD.
>> No more then I liked the last FOUR actors who played Batman.
>> Need I say more?
>
> Please don't. My eyes are glazing over.
>
> Anyways, who is this Craig Period chap you're going on about?

Bugger!

Should have read your answer before posting mine.
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303545 ] Mi, 19 Juli 2006 23:21
Paul Clarke  
Blofelds Cat wrote:
> "Paul Clarke" <jim_caerleon [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:bwwvg.117468$I61.68961 [at] clgrps13...
>
>>VINCE wrote:
>>
>>
>>>>Well, I hope you get a pleasant surprise. I'm optimistic even though I
>>>>have been sorely disappointed with the last two films.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>You're missing the point, I DON'T LIKE CRAIG PERIOD.
>>>No more then I liked the last FOUR actors who played Batman.
>>>Need I say more?
>>
>>Please don't. My eyes are glazing over.
>>
>>Anyways, who is this Craig Period chap you're going on about?
>
>
> Bugger!
>
> Should have read your answer before posting mine.
>

LOL! And Vince should have read "Eats, Shoots and Leaves" to learn about
the importance of punctuation.


--
==007===
“My dear girl, there are some things that just aren't done, such as
drinking Dom Perignon '53 above a temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit.
That's as bad as putting a secret agent in a gorilla suit.”
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303556 ] Do, 20 Juli 2006 02:06
phil.gerrard1  
WQ wrote:

> --- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
> that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
> that hasn't been finished yet.

What Mac said. I'd be welcoming 'James Bond will return in...' in
itself even if I thought CR was going to be godawful.

> You sure you guys aren't twins?

Get us started on LTK sometime. Stand well back.

> In the meantime, digest the script and review properly - am looking forward to
> the bashing sessions ahead.

So far I've managed a couple of initial skims, which I think are always
helpful when reading a film, TV, or theatre script for the first time
anyway. I won't manage a fully detailled read for a few days yet. My
first impressions are that your touchstones of TLD and FYEO are pretty
well correct, although I think this may be better than both. And no,
it's not FRWL, but as a *screenplay* I feel it may turn out to be the
one I've liked best since OHMSS.

Best

Phil
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303559 ] Do, 20 Juli 2006 02:29
WQ  
phil.gerrard [at] ntlworld.com wrote:
> WQ wrote:
>
> > --- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
> > that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
> > that hasn't been finished yet.
>
> What Mac said. I'd be welcoming 'James Bond will return in...' in
> itself even if I thought CR was going to be godawful.
>
> > You sure you guys aren't twins?
>
> Get us started on LTK sometime. Stand well back.
>
> > In the meantime, digest the script and review properly - am looking forward to
> > the bashing sessions ahead.
>
> So far I've managed a couple of initial skims, which I think are always
> helpful when reading a film, TV, or theatre script for the first time
> anyway. I won't manage a fully detailled read for a few days yet. My
> first impressions are that your touchstones of TLD and FYEO are pretty
> well correct, although I think this may be better than both. And no,
> it's not FRWL, but as a *screenplay* I feel it may turn out to be the
> one I've liked best since OHMSS.
>

--- I'll reserve my 2 cents worth till you're really done with it.

> Best
>
> Phil
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303566 ] Do, 20 Juli 2006 05:18
JHause  
Why? You sent them the CR script you wrote in your mom's basement?
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303567 ] Do, 20 Juli 2006 05:20
JHause  
WQ wrote:
>
> --- I'll reserve my 2 cents worth till you're really done with it.
>

You have to wait on two cents? I guess writing scripts in your mom's
basement doesn't pay very well.
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303568 ] Do, 20 Juli 2006 05:21
JHause  
Because there's nothing more fun than kicking the hot air out of a
windbag.
Re: "James Bond will return in RISICO" [message #303624 ] Fr, 21 Juli 2006 03:03
Rich Handley  
VINCE <Holvbphoto [at] optonline.net> said:
>WQ wrote:
>> WQ wrote:
>>>--- Aw, there you guys go again, creaming in your pants over something
>>>that hasn't even begun yet and who knows if you'll even like the one
>>>that hasn't been finished yet. You sure you guys aren't twins? In the
>>>meantime, digest the script and review properly - am looking forward to
>>>the bashing sessions ahead.
>> --- Oh, and while we're creaming, how about:
>> James Bond will return in The Hildebrand Rarity
>> to wrap up Craig's trilogy?

Vince is talking to himself again.
Vorheriges Thema:Casino Royale acronym confusion
Nächstes Thema:WRECKING CREW
Gehe zu:
  


aktuelle Zeit: Mi Mai 23 15:05:50 CEST 2012

Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,05560 Sekunden
.:: Startseite - Hinweise - Impressum ::.

Powered