| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190169] |
Do, 29 Dezember 2005 00:09 |
|
whodunit wrote:
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4563814.stm
YAY! :) Great link! Thank you so much!
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190182 ] |
Do, 29 Dezember 2005 03:34 |
|
ToolPackinMama wrote:
> whodunit wrote:
>
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4563814.stm
>
> YAY! :) Great link! Thank you so much!
Notice that it says "Star Trek" and not "Enterprise" or "Voyager" or
"Deep Space Nine."
--
OSI
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190183 ] |
Do, 29 Dezember 2005 04:11 |
|
"OSI" <abuse [at] msn.com> wrote in message
news:uWHsf.61892$6e.30937 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>
>> whodunit wrote:
>>
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4563814.stm
>>
>> YAY! :) Great link! Thank you so much!
>
> Notice that it says "Star Trek" and not "Enterprise" or "Voyager" or "Deep
> Space Nine."
Or "Next Generation".
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190185 ] |
Do, 29 Dezember 2005 04:37 |
|
OSI wrote:
> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>
>> whodunit wrote:
>>
>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4563814.stm
>>
>>
>> YAY! :) Great link! Thank you so much!
>
>
> Notice that it says "Star Trek" and not "Enterprise" or "Voyager" or
> "Deep Space Nine."
::highfive!:: :)
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190194 ] |
Do, 29 Dezember 2005 07:37 |
|
Marcovaldo wrote:
> "OSI" <abuse [at] msn.com> wrote in message
> news:uWHsf.61892$6e.30937 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
>> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>>
>>> whodunit wrote:
>>>
>>>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4563814.stm
>>>
>>> YAY! :) Great link! Thank you so much!
>>
>> Notice that it says "Star Trek" and not "Enterprise" or "Voyager" or
>> "Deep Space Nine."
>
> Or "Next Generation".
Yup, TOS will always be #1
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190195 ] |
Do, 29 Dezember 2005 07:50 |
|
> Yup, TOS will always be #1
Yup. :)
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190196 ] |
Do, 29 Dezember 2005 14:26 |
|
I think they meant "Star Trek" in any form, not the actual original
series.
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190204 ] |
Do, 29 Dezember 2005 16:54 |
|
<enovak7924 [at] aol.com> wrote...
>I think they meant "Star Trek" in any form, not the actual original
> series.
Considering that older series like "Blake's 7" and "Fawlty Towers"
were also on that list, I don't think you can necessarily make that
assumption.
GeneK
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190210 ] |
Do, 29 Dezember 2005 17:50 |
|
<enovak7924 [at] aol.com> wrote in message
news:1135862796.212068.40590 [at] o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
> I think they meant "Star Trek" in any form, not the actual original
> series.
What part of,
"Originally broadcast in the US in 1966, it topped a poll of more than 1,000
viewers"
would make you think "Star Trek in any form," and not the actual original
series.
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190221 ] |
Do, 29 Dezember 2005 20:05 |
|
ToolPackinMama wrote:
> whodunit wrote:
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4563814.stm
>
> YAY! :) Great link! Thank you so much!
Saw that one too.
Number one: Star Trek and number two Buffy.
They are mine too.;)
Hence my first domain on the net.
--
Wouter Valentijn
www.wouter.cc
www.nksf.nl
www.zeppodunsel.nl
liam=mail
The glory of creation is in its infinite diversity and the ways our
differences combine to create meaning and beauty.
Vulcan IDIC "Is There In Truth No Beauty?"
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190257 ] |
Fr, 30 Dezember 2005 16:43 |
|
|
The part that I didn't read. I stand corrected.
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190275 ] |
Sa, 31 Dezember 2005 04:12 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190279 ] |
Sa, 31 Dezember 2005 05:23 |
|
enovak7924 [at] aol.com wrote:
> I think they meant "Star Trek" in any form, not the actual original
> series.
Perhaps you are right. Can you explain why you think that?
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190296 ] |
Sa, 31 Dezember 2005 14:43 |
|
plantagenet47 [at] yahoo.com wrote:
> x-no-archive: yes
>
> IWhy is Stargate on that list, considering it's still running?
Maybe not currently in the UK?
--
Wouter Valentijn
www.wouter.cc
www.nksf.nl
www.zeppodunsel.nl
liam=mail
The glory of creation is in its infinite diversity and the ways our
differences combine to create meaning and beauty.
Vulcan IDIC "Is There In Truth No Beauty?"
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190300 ] |
Sa, 31 Dezember 2005 17:59 |
|
"Wouter Valentijn" <liam [at] valentijn.nu> wrote in message
news:43b68afb$0$11063$e4fe514c [at] news.xs4all.nl...
> plantagenet47 [at] yahoo.com wrote:
> > x-no-archive: yes
> >
> > IWhy is Stargate on that list, considering it's still running?
>
> Maybe not currently in the UK?
There you go again Wouter, applying some basic logic to things again. {{;-)>
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190350 ] |
Mo, 02 Januar 2006 01:57 |
|
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:50:51 GMT, "Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote,
in part:
><enovak7924 [at] aol.com> wrote in message
>news:1135862796.212068.40590 [at] o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>> I think they meant "Star Trek" in any form, not the actual original
>> series.
>What part of,
>"Originally broadcast in the US in 1966, it topped a poll of more than 1,000
>viewers"
>would make you think "Star Trek in any form," and not the actual original
>series.
I'm glad the people who wrote the article had a clear idea in their
minds that the original Star Trek series was distinct from the others.
Those anwering the poll may not.
On the other hand, even if it *is* the original series that most fans
miss, that longing is at least *partially* satisfied by its successors.
John Savard
http://www.quadibloc.com/index.html
_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account
|
|
|
| Re: "Star Trek most missed series" [message #190354 ] |
Mo, 02 Januar 2006 05:09 |
|
Wow. Over 1000 people polled. That sure respresents a high percentage of the
UK.
"ToolPackinMama" <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote in message
news:3YKdnWmS6Pa_hi7eRVn-qg [at] comcast.com...
> whodunit wrote:
>> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4563814.stm
>
> YAY! :) Great link! Thank you so much!
|
|
|
