|
Sprinkler Systems
Uhaul move
Lawn care
Roses and trees
Ford Parts
Chrysler Parts
Lake Powell
New IPod Touch Apps
New IPhone Apps
IPhone Apps
IPad Information
IPad Apps
Android APPS
Android Games APPS
Android Systems
Android Tablets APPS and Beyond
Smartphone Apps
Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools
Tablet PC
Car Sharing Car Leasing
Tabler Pc
Fly Fishing
Toyota Cars
Vacation Rentals
Stock market
NYSE
SSE Stock
Freight & Shipping News
Gluten
Lactose
Gout
My Coupon Life
Campgrounds Check
Outdoor
Kitchen Design and Redoo
Bath Remodeling
Palm Springs
Las Vegas Vacation Tipps
Lake Powell Boating
Homes for lease
Electric and green Car Blog
Pearls and diamonds
Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App
Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
|
Science Fiction » alt.startrek » BSG, Sodomy and the Origin of AIDS
| BSG, Sodomy and the Origin of AIDS [message #147596] |
Di, 11 Oktober 2005 20:52 |
|
The available evidence clearly shows that the HIV AIDS virus originated in the homosexual community in the US and
their involvement in medical experiments to address certain forms of cancer and other ailments homosexuals were spreading
to each other in the 1970's. From that interaction between US homosexuals and the US medical research community,
the HIV AIDS virus was spread to the black population in the Congo, Africa in projects in which the
US medical community claimed to be helping out in Africa.
Then US homosexuals spread the HIV AIDS virus to the black community in the US and the medical blood supply,
by giving blood to hospitals and the Red Cross, knowing full well that their blood was diseased, hoping that by spreading
the disease to non-homosexuals, more research funds would be allocated to finding a cure to this disease.
Note that this is entirely consistent with the selfish attitude of the right wing libertarian Hollywood Homosexual community
in general, which has been discussed here.
In fact there are still legal battles with homosexuals giving blood to this day.
Any blood borne disease will spread fastest in the homosexual community for two reasons:
1) homosexuals have an incredible number of homosexual partners in a brief period of time, and
2) the homosexual act involves an unnatural act bringing a hard object with force and unnatural repetitive friction
within the anal tract, which causes cuts and blood admixes with the diseased ejaculate, spreading disease through
the anal cuts and through the soft tissue of the urethra and prepuce.
A few years after the claimed AIDS 'discovery' in Africa, another dangerous disease, Ebola, was claimed to have been
'discovered' in exactly the same country, The Congo, in Africa, where the US medical community had established
a base of operations and medical experimentation.
The fact that most people in the US believe that AIDS originated in Africa is just another one of those amazing
public relations coups which results from the overwhelming stranglehold that Hollywood Homosexuals
possess over the News Media, which they also abuse to sell Sodomy to you and your kids on TV in BSG
and other fake science fiction series.
Ultimately, it is in the interests of every American to ascertain the truth about where these 2 diseases and
other more recent diseases originated.
If the US people knew where those two diseases really originated, they would want to know why we are spending
so much money funding biological research in the US when these research operations are in fact the source of these
new diseases, carefully spreading these diseases so that the biological research industry can continue to siphon off
huge amounts of billions of dollars from the US taxpayer, claiming to search for cures.
Politics
============================================================ ==================
==========================excerpt from alt.battlestar-galactica============================
===========SNL Patrick Stewart 1994 Appearance #6 -- skits opposing ST:DS9 Sodomy direction========
><pbowles [at] aol.com> wrote in message news:1122192809.496225.127220 [at] o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>><pbow... [at] aol.com> wrote in message news:1122078686.441569.118160 [at] g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>><pbow... [at] aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:1121912695.386719.290100 [at] f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>The article clearly shows that these claims of the Sailor or the Bantu man were false alarms.
>It makes no mention of the Bantu man at all. Since I'd never heard of
>the sailor before this, I don't know how credible those claims were to
>begin with.
It does mention the Bantu man.
==================================================
http://www.africaspeaks.com/articles/2005/0903.html
The 1959 specimen was obtained from a Bantu man living in Kinshasa, the Congo. His name and health status were
not recorded. Details of the history and testing of this specimen (later heralded as the "world's oldest HIV-
positive blood sample") are recorded in The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS [1999], by
journalist Edward Hooper who theorizes that HIV was introduced into Africans via the polio vaccine programs in
the late 1950s. Hooper claims the polio vaccine was prepared using chimp kidney cells contaminated with the
ancestor virus of HIV.
When tested for HIV in the mid-1980s, the 1959 blood sample was the only specimen out of 700 stored frozen
Congo bloods that tested positive for HIV. Originally collected by Arno Motulsky on a Rockefeller grant, the
African sample was one of many sent to the University of Washington in Seattle and used for genetic testing
and included in report, "Population Genetic Studies," published in 1966.
Around 1970, the remaining 672 frozen bloods were flown to Emory University in Atlanta for further genetic
tests. In 1985 the specimens again changed hands, this time for HIV testing by Andre Nahmias, a virologist and
animal researcher associated with the Yerkes Primate Center at Emory. The Congo specimens were tested along
with 500 other blood specimens taken from blacks living in sub-Saharan Africa between the years 1959 and 1982.
Initially over 90% of specimens taken in 1959 tested positive for HIV by the ELISA test. However, these HIV-
positive tests were later determined to be false-positive. After the examinations at Emory, the specimens were
shipped to Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for HIV testing in Max Essex' lab.
==================================================
>> The writer describes how 700 other contemporary Congo
>>blood samples tested negative and that there was widespread contamination of these labs
>>at the time causing false positives.
>Firstly we don't know they were contemporary - it just said 700 samples
>were tested, and that one of them was from 1959. Secondly we have no
>reason to believe the first victim's sample was among them. Thirdly
>this study was from 1966 and the BBC article referring to the Bantu man
>was from 2004 - given that the information from this study is publicly
>available, researchers in the area would be fully aware of its findings
>and would incorporate them into their understanding of the history of
>the disease.
The article does state that the initial 700 blood samples were taken in 1959
" Initially over 90% of specimens taken in 1959 tested positive for HIV by the ELISA test."
>>Nowadays, scientists hunt for "ancestor" viruses of HIV in chimps in the African wild and
>>ignore all the immunosuppressive viruses that were created in virus laboratories shortly before AIDS.
>What's more they've found said ancestor virus, as mentioned in the BBC
>article. In chimps (well, bonobos) no less.
By 2004, the final test (1959 Bantu sample now completely used up, they claim) on the Bantu man's blood had
been performed by David Ho with the latest DNA testing PCR technology and he did not find the live virus or
even full evidence of the prior presence of the whole DNA of the virus. This taken with the contaminations known
to have occurred in the labs through which this sample passed calls this test into question.
The HIV virus is claimed by these researchers to mutate, making it difficult for them to successfully falsify the exact 1959
version of the virus. Thus it appears they contaminated it with a dead fragment of the virus, to fake it in an untraceable way.
========================================================
http://www.aidsorigins.com/glossary.shtml
GENOME Total genetic material of a cell or virus.
PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) Process involving isolation and amplification of a
specific DNA sequence which can then be studied.
VIRION Single, complete virus particle, consisting of a core of nucleic acid, within a protein envelope.
VIRUS Minute infectious agent, only able to multiply inside a living host cell.
========================================================
>>"As soon as homosexuals signed up as guinea pigs for government-sponsored hepatitis B vaccine
>>experiments, they began to die with a strange virus of unknown origin."
>This is a claim. Evidence would involve identifying whether any
>particular homosexuals given the vaccine died from the "strange virus"
>afterwards, and any evidence that that virus was in fact AIDS. This
>claim could simply mean that after one or two homosexuals in Manhattan
>volunteered for the vaccine a few on the other side of the island died,
>in which case there would be no connection at all. If Cantwell had any
>evidence of specific cases he would have presented it here.
The fact that they began to die immediately, indicates that these homosexuals may already
have contracted the AIDS virus and had reduced immune systems or had their immune systems
depleted by drugs as Cantwell described.
>>"In order to induce primates and other research animals to acquire cancer, their immune system
>>was deliberately suppressed by drugs, radiation, or cancer-causing chemicals or substances.
>>The thymus gland and/or the spleen were removed, and viruses were injected into
>>newborn animals or into the womb of pregnant animals. Some animals were injected with
>>malaria to keep them chronically sick and immunodepressed."
>So...these poor infected homosexuals were kept in laboratory conditions
>for weeks or months with their immune system being periodically
>suppressed by drugs, radiation and possibly malaria? There isn't some
>'magic bullet' you can inject someone with that then leaves their
>immune system crippled for life - this sort of study can only be
>carried out with repeated exposure to the immune suppressant.
It is obvious that immunodepression is an important factor in biological viral research.
And this research was dovetailing with 'discovery' of another virus, Ebola, which suspiciously was also 'first 'discovered'
in Congo (formerly Zaire), Africa. African governments should be very suspicious about any westerner coming to their
country claiming to be a medical researcher.
==============================================
http://www.d2ol.com/ebola.html
Ebola hemorrhagic fever (Ebola HF) is a severe, often-fatal disease in humans and nonhuman
primates (monkeys and chimpanzees) that has appeared sporadically since its initial recognition in 1976.
The disease is caused by infection with Ebola virus, named after a river in the Democratic Republic
of the Congo (formerly Zaire) in Africa, where it was first recognized.
==============================================
>> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0917211251/ref =cm_aya_a...
>>Interesting that of all the 4 Amazon reviews written by Amazon's customers, you picked the
>>only one which did not give the Cantwell book 5 stars out of 5 stars, but gave it 3 of 5 instead.
[>I 'picked' the one that came up when I typed "Alan Cantwell" + review
>into the search engine. Strangely enough, none of the other three
>review the book in any detail (comments along the lines of "Yeah! I
>knew it!" aren't really that persuasive) and none attempts a critique
>of what he writes. Again, the claim that he provides no evidence, made
>by the reviewer I cited, is a factual one open to investigation if you
>wish to dispute it. Given the citations you've provided to date, it so
>far seems a wholly accurate analysis.] -- JS did not write this
[>Cantwell seems to be describing disposal of the primates that he learnt from documentation
> and it seems there was not a standing policy to destroy any primate after 'inoculation' testing,
>which might even be illegal.] -- JS wrote this.
I am tiring of your posting text you wrote as mine with indenting indicating I wrote it
and vice versa.
What is clear is the US biological researchers were in Africa during the mid-1970's, so
there is no necessity that the primates they imported from Congo had to be returned
to Congo for US researchers to have started these diseases in Africa.
The two claims of 'discovery' of both Ebola and AIDS in Congo, Africa
is extremely suspicious.
============================================================ ======
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: BSG, Sodomy and the Origin of AIDS [message #147614 ] |
Mi, 12 Oktober 2005 06:10 |
|
"John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gRT2f.69855$lq6.12426 [at] fed1read01...
Reality isn't your strong suit ...... is it?!?!?!!?
|
|
|
| Re: BSG, Sodomy and the Origin of AIDS [message #147619 ] |
Mi, 12 Oktober 2005 14:24 |
|
"ZenIsWhen" <here'slooking [at] youkid.com> wrote in message news:11kp35p7r2n949b [at] corp.supernews.com...
> "John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message news:gRT2f.69855$lq6.12426 [at] fed1read01...
> Reality isn't your strong suit ...... is it?!?!?!!?
This is the truth. There is no question about it.
Homosexuals and the US biological research community brought HIV AIDS to the US and the world, not African primates.
The crooks in the Press knows this.
Politics
============================================================ =====
The available evidence clearly shows that the HIV AIDS virus originated in the homosexual community in the US and
their involvement in medical experiments to address certain forms of cancer and other ailments homosexuals were spreading
to each other in the 1970's. From that interaction between US homosexuals and the US medical research community,
the HIV AIDS virus was spread to the black population in the Congo, Africa in projects in which the
US medical community claimed to be helping out in Africa.
Then US homosexuals spread the HIV AIDS virus to the black community in the US and the medical blood supply,
by giving blood to hospitals and the Red Cross, knowing full well that their blood was diseased, hoping that by spreading
the disease to non-homosexuals, more research funds would be allocated to finding a cure to this disease.
Note that this is entirely consistent with the selfish attitude of the right wing libertarian Hollywood Homosexual community
in general, which has been discussed here.
In fact there are still legal battles with homosexuals giving blood to this day.
Any blood borne disease will spread fastest in the homosexual community for two reasons:
1) homosexuals have an incredible number of homosexual partners in a brief period of time, and
2) the homosexual act involves an unnatural act bringing a hard object with force and unnatural repetitive friction
within the anal tract, which causes cuts and blood admixes with the diseased ejaculate, spreading disease through
the anal cuts and through the soft tissue of the urethra and prepuce.
A few years after the claimed AIDS 'discovery' in Africa, another dangerous disease, Ebola, was claimed to have been
'discovered' in exactly the same country, The Congo, in Africa, where the US medical community had established
a base of operations and medical experimentation.
The fact that most people in the US believe that AIDS originated in Africa is just another one of those amazing
public relations coups which results from the overwhelming stranglehold that Hollywood Homosexuals
possess over the News Media, which they also abuse to sell Sodomy to you and your kids on TV in BSG
and other fake science fiction series.
Ultimately, it is in the interests of every American to ascertain the truth about where these 2 diseases and
other more recent diseases originated.
If the US people knew where those two diseases really originated, they would want to know why we are spending
so much money funding biological research in the US when these research operations are in fact the source of these
new diseases, carefully spreading these diseases so that the biological research industry can continue to siphon off
huge amounts of billions of dollars from the US taxpayer, claiming to search for cures.
Politics
============================================================ ==================
==========================excerpt from alt.battlestar-galactica============================
===========SNL Patrick Stewart 1994 Appearance #6 -- skits opposing ST:DS9 Sodomy direction========
><pbowles [at] aol.com> wrote in message news:1122192809.496225.127220 [at] o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>><pbow... [at] aol.com> wrote in message news:1122078686.441569.118160 [at] g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>><pbow... [at] aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:1121912695.386719.290100 [at] f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>The article clearly shows that these claims of the Sailor or the Bantu man were false alarms.
>It makes no mention of the Bantu man at all. Since I'd never heard of
>the sailor before this, I don't know how credible those claims were to
>begin with.
It does mention the Bantu man.
==================================================
http://www.africaspeaks.com/articles/2005/0903.html
The 1959 specimen was obtained from a Bantu man living in Kinshasa, the Congo. His name and health status were
not recorded. Details of the history and testing of this specimen (later heralded as the "world's oldest HIV-
positive blood sample") are recorded in The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS [1999], by
journalist Edward Hooper who theorizes that HIV was introduced into Africans via the polio vaccine programs in
the late 1950s. Hooper claims the polio vaccine was prepared using chimp kidney cells contaminated with the
ancestor virus of HIV.
When tested for HIV in the mid-1980s, the 1959 blood sample was the only specimen out of 700 stored frozen
Congo bloods that tested positive for HIV. Originally collected by Arno Motulsky on a Rockefeller grant, the
African sample was one of many sent to the University of Washington in Seattle and used for genetic testing
and included in report, "Population Genetic Studies," published in 1966.
Around 1970, the remaining 672 frozen bloods were flown to Emory University in Atlanta for further genetic
tests. In 1985 the specimens again changed hands, this time for HIV testing by Andre Nahmias, a virologist and
animal researcher associated with the Yerkes Primate Center at Emory. The Congo specimens were tested along
with 500 other blood specimens taken from blacks living in sub-Saharan Africa between the years 1959 and 1982.
Initially over 90% of specimens taken in 1959 tested positive for HIV by the ELISA test. However, these HIV-
positive tests were later determined to be false-positive. After the examinations at Emory, the specimens were
shipped to Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for HIV testing in Max Essex' lab.
==================================================
>> The writer describes how 700 other contemporary Congo
>>blood samples tested negative and that there was widespread contamination of these labs
>>at the time causing false positives.
>Firstly we don't know they were contemporary - it just said 700 samples
>were tested, and that one of them was from 1959. Secondly we have no
>reason to believe the first victim's sample was among them. Thirdly
>this study was from 1966 and the BBC article referring to the Bantu man
>was from 2004 - given that the information from this study is publicly
>available, researchers in the area would be fully aware of its findings
>and would incorporate them into their understanding of the history of
>the disease.
The article does state that the initial 700 blood samples were taken in 1959
" Initially over 90% of specimens taken in 1959 tested positive for HIV by the ELISA test."
>>Nowadays, scientists hunt for "ancestor" viruses of HIV in chimps in the African wild and
>>ignore all the immunosuppressive viruses that were created in virus laboratories shortly before AIDS.
>What's more they've found said ancestor virus, as mentioned in the BBC
>article. In chimps (well, bonobos) no less.
By 2004, the final test (1959 Bantu sample now completely used up, they claim) on the Bantu man's blood had
been performed by David Ho with the latest DNA testing PCR technology and he did not find the live virus or
even full evidence of the prior presence of the whole DNA of the virus. This taken with the contaminations known
to have occurred in the labs through which this sample passed calls this test into question.
The HIV virus is claimed by these researchers to mutate, making it difficult for them to successfully falsify the exact 1959
version of the virus. Thus it appears they contaminated it with a dead fragment of the virus, to fake it in an untraceable way.
========================================================
http://www.aidsorigins.com/glossary.shtml
GENOME Total genetic material of a cell or virus.
PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) Process involving isolation and amplification of a
specific DNA sequence which can then be studied.
VIRION Single, complete virus particle, consisting of a core of nucleic acid, within a protein envelope.
VIRUS Minute infectious agent, only able to multiply inside a living host cell.
========================================================
>>"As soon as homosexuals signed up as guinea pigs for government-sponsored hepatitis B vaccine
>>experiments, they began to die with a strange virus of unknown origin."
>This is a claim. Evidence would involve identifying whether any
>particular homosexuals given the vaccine died from the "strange virus"
>afterwards, and any evidence that that virus was in fact AIDS. This
>claim could simply mean that after one or two homosexuals in Manhattan
>volunteered for the vaccine a few on the other side of the island died,
>in which case there would be no connection at all. If Cantwell had any
>evidence of specific cases he would have presented it here.
The fact that they began to die immediately, indicates that these homosexuals may already
have contracted the AIDS virus and had reduced immune systems or had their immune systems
depleted by drugs as Cantwell described.
>>"In order to induce primates and other research animals to acquire cancer, their immune system
>>was deliberately suppressed by drugs, radiation, or cancer-causing chemicals or substances.
>>The thymus gland and/or the spleen were removed, and viruses were injected into
>>newborn animals or into the womb of pregnant animals. Some animals were injected with
>>malaria to keep them chronically sick and immunodepressed."
>So...these poor infected homosexuals were kept in laboratory conditions
>for weeks or months with their immune system being periodically
>suppressed by drugs, radiation and possibly malaria? There isn't some
>'magic bullet' you can inject someone with that then leaves their
>immune system crippled for life - this sort of study can only be
>carried out with repeated exposure to the immune suppressant.
It is obvious that immunodepression is an important factor in biological viral research.
And this research was dovetailing with 'discovery' of another virus, Ebola, which suspiciously was also 'first 'discovered'
in Congo (formerly Zaire), Africa. African governments should be very suspicious about any westerner coming to their
country claiming to be a medical researcher.
==============================================
http://www.d2ol.com/ebola.html
Ebola hemorrhagic fever (Ebola HF) is a severe, often-fatal disease in humans and nonhuman
primates (monkeys and chimpanzees) that has appeared sporadically since its initial recognition in 1976.
The disease is caused by infection with Ebola virus, named after a river in the Democratic Republic
of the Congo (formerly Zaire) in Africa, where it was first recognized.
==============================================
>> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0917211251/ref =cm_aya_a...
>>Interesting that of all the 4 Amazon reviews written by Amazon's customers, you picked the
>>only one which did not give the Cantwell book 5 stars out of 5 stars, but gave it 3 of 5 instead.
[>I 'picked' the one that came up when I typed "Alan Cantwell" + review
>into the search engine. Strangely enough, none of the other three
>review the book in any detail (comments along the lines of "Yeah! I
>knew it!" aren't really that persuasive) and none attempts a critique
>of what he writes. Again, the claim that he provides no evidence, made
>by the reviewer I cited, is a factual one open to investigation if you
>wish to dispute it. Given the citations you've provided to date, it so
>far seems a wholly accurate analysis.] -- JS did not write this
[>Cantwell seems to be describing disposal of the primates that he learnt from documentation
> and it seems there was not a standing policy to destroy any primate after 'inoculation' testing,
>which might even be illegal.] -- JS wrote this.
I am tiring of your posting text you wrote as mine with indenting indicating I wrote it
and vice versa.
What is clear is the US biological researchers were in Africa during the mid-1970's, so
there is no necessity that the primates they imported from Congo had to be returned
to Congo for US researchers to have started these diseases in Africa.
The two claims of 'discovery' of both Ebola and AIDS in Congo, Africa
is extremely suspicious.
============================================================ ======
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: BSG, Sodomy and the Origin of AIDS [message #147658 ] |
Do, 13 Oktober 2005 00:07 |
|
"John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:gRT2f.69855$lq6.12426 [at] fed1read01...
> The available evidence clearly shows that the HIV AIDS virus originated in
> the homosexual community in the US and
> their involvement in medical experiments to address certain forms of
> cancer and other ailments homosexuals were spreading
> to each other in the 1970's. From that interaction between US homosexuals
> and the US medical research community,
> the HIV AIDS virus was spread to the black population in the Congo, Africa
> in projects in which the
> US medical community claimed to be helping out in Africa.
>
> Then US homosexuals spread the HIV AIDS virus to the black community in
> the US and the medical blood supply,
> by giving blood to hospitals and the Red Cross, knowing full well that
> their blood was diseased, hoping that by spreading
> the disease to non-homosexuals, more research funds would be allocated to
> finding a cure to this disease.
> Note that this is entirely consistent with the selfish attitude of the
> right wing libertarian Hollywood Homosexual community
> in general, which has been discussed here.
> In fact there are still legal battles with homosexuals giving blood to
> this day.
>
> Any blood borne disease will spread fastest in the homosexual community
> for two reasons:
> 1) homosexuals have an incredible number of homosexual partners in a
> brief period of time, and
> 2) the homosexual act involves an unnatural act bringing a hard object
> with force and unnatural repetitive friction
> within the anal tract, which causes cuts and blood admixes with the
> diseased ejaculate, spreading disease through
> the anal cuts and through the soft tissue of the urethra and prepuce.
>
> A few years after the claimed AIDS 'discovery' in Africa, another
> dangerous disease, Ebola, was claimed to have been
> 'discovered' in exactly the same country, The Congo, in Africa, where the
> US medical community had established
> a base of operations and medical experimentation.
>
> The fact that most people in the US believe that AIDS originated in Africa
> is just another one of those amazing
> public relations coups which results from the overwhelming stranglehold
> that Hollywood Homosexuals
> possess over the News Media, which they also abuse to sell Sodomy to you
> and your kids on TV in BSG
> and other fake science fiction series.
>
> Ultimately, it is in the interests of every American to ascertain the
> truth about where these 2 diseases and
> other more recent diseases originated.
> If the US people knew where those two diseases really originated, they
> would want to know why we are spending
> so much money funding biological research in the US when these research
> operations are in fact the source of these
> new diseases, carefully spreading these diseases so that the biological
> research industry can continue to siphon off
> huge amounts of billions of dollars from the US taxpayer, claiming to
> search for cures.
>
> Politics
>
Thank you Rev Phelps.
|
|
|
| Re: BSG, Sodomy and the Origin of AIDS [message #147664 ] |
Do, 13 Oktober 2005 01:35 |
|
"Barbi Satin" <jk2112 [at] comcast.net> wrote in message news:JsGdnX40Y43aFdDeRVn-ow [at] comcast.com...
> "John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message news:gRT2f.69855$lq6.12426 [at] fed1read01...
>> The available evidence clearly shows that the HIV AIDS virus originated in the homosexual community in the US and
>> their involvement in medical experiments to address certain forms of cancer and other ailments homosexuals were spreading
>> to each other in the 1970's. From that interaction between US homosexuals and the US medical research community,
>> the HIV AIDS virus was spread to the black population in the Congo, Africa in projects in which the
>> US medical community claimed to be helping out in Africa.
>>
>> Then US homosexuals spread the HIV AIDS virus to the black community in the US and the medical blood supply,
>> by giving blood to hospitals and the Red Cross, knowing full well that their blood was diseased, hoping that by spreading
>> the disease to non-homosexuals, more research funds would be allocated to finding a cure to this disease.
>> Note that this is entirely consistent with the selfish attitude of the right wing libertarian Hollywood Homosexual community
>> in general, which has been discussed here.
>> In fact there are still legal battles with homosexuals giving blood to this day.
>>
>> Any blood borne disease will spread fastest in the homosexual community for two reasons:
>> 1) homosexuals have an incredible number of homosexual partners in a brief period of time, and
>> 2) the homosexual act involves an unnatural act bringing a hard object with force and unnatural repetitive friction
>> within the anal tract, which causes cuts and blood admixes with the diseased ejaculate, spreading disease through
>> the anal cuts and through the soft tissue of the urethra and prepuce.
>>
>> A few years after the claimed AIDS 'discovery' in Africa, another dangerous disease, Ebola, was claimed to have been
>> 'discovered' in exactly the same country, The Congo, in Africa, where the US medical community had established
>> a base of operations and medical experimentation.
>>
>> The fact that most people in the US believe that AIDS originated in Africa is just another one of those amazing
>> public relations coups which results from the overwhelming stranglehold that Hollywood Homosexuals
>> possess over the News Media, which they also abuse to sell Sodomy to you and your kids on TV in BSG
>> and other fake science fiction series.
>>
>> Ultimately, it is in the interests of every American to ascertain the truth about where these 2 diseases and
>> other more recent diseases originated.
>> If the US people knew where those two diseases really originated, they would want to know why we are spending
>> so much money funding biological research in the US when these research operations are in fact the source of these
>> new diseases, carefully spreading these diseases so that the biological research industry can continue to siphon off
>> huge amounts of billions of dollars from the US taxpayer, claiming to search for cures.
>> Politics
> Thank you Rev Phelps.
Who is Rev. Phelps.
It is amazing that information of this gravity which affects the health of every citizen and their kids
is being kept from the public by the Hollywood Homosexual stranglehold on the News Media.
Due to this stranglehold, new diseases can be introduced to the US public without proper government scrutiny.
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: BSG, Sodomy and the Origin of AIDS [message #147665 ] |
Do, 13 Oktober 2005 02:15 |
|
John Shocked wrote:
> "Barbi Satin" <jk2112 [at] comcast.net> wrote in message news:JsGdnX40Y43aFdDeRVn-ow [at] comcast.com...
> >[snipped]
These subjects are not on topic to sci.med.diseases.cancer.
Trim your newsgroups and stop crossposting or your posts will be forwarded to abuse [at] your isp..
This newsgroup has a Charter and your ISP's respect same.
For Barbi:
http://www.comcast.net/terms/use.jsp
Newsgroups
Messages posted to newsgroups must comply with the written charters or FAQs for those newsgroups as well as any other terms and
conditions applicable to any particular newsgroups or provider of newsgroups. Advertisements, solicitations, or other commercial
messages should be posted only in those newsgroups whose charters or FAQs explicitly permit them. You are responsible for
determining the policies of a given newsgroup before posting to it. Comcast reserves the right to discontinue access to any
newsgroup at any time for any reason.
For John Shocked:
http://www.cox.com/policy/#aup_14
# Newsgroups.
Messages posted to newsgroups must comply with the written charters or FAQs for those newsgroups.
You are responsible for determining the policies of a given newsgroup before posting to it.
|
|
|
| Re: BSG, Sodomy and the Origin of AIDS [message #147668 ] |
Do, 13 Oktober 2005 03:35 |
|
"John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:O5h3f.72325$lq6.53317 [at] fed1read01...
Please forward all posts by this fool to abuse [at] cox.net. He is violating the
Cox Acceptable Use Policy by spamming off-topic, hate-filled, and libelous
posts to multiple groups, which violates the AUP.
http://www.cox.com/policy/
Be sure to include the post headers and a brief note as to why the fool is
being reported.
|
|
|
| Re: BSG, Sodomy and the Origin of AIDS [message #147669 ] |
Do, 13 Oktober 2005 03:42 |
|
"Allen" <Allen [at] anon.inv> wrote in message news:434DA73B.98D8FC66 [at] execulink.com...
> John Shocked wrote:
>> "Barbi Satin" <jk2112 [at] comcast.net> wrote in message news:JsGdnX40Y43aFdDeRVn-ow [at] comcast.com...
>> >[snipped]
> These subjects are not on topic to sci.med.diseases.cancer.
> Trim your newsgroups and stop crossposting or your posts will be forwarded to abuse [at] your isp..
> This newsgroup has a Charter and your ISP's respect same.
> For Barbi:
> http://www.comcast.net/terms/use.jsp
> Newsgroups
> Messages posted to newsgroups must comply with the written charters or FAQs for those newsgroups as well as any other terms and
> conditions applicable to any particular newsgroups or provider of newsgroups. Advertisements, solicitations, or other commercial
> messages should be posted only in those newsgroups whose charters or FAQs explicitly permit them. You are responsible for
> determining the policies of a given newsgroup before posting to it. Comcast reserves the right to discontinue access to any
> newsgroup at any time for any reason.
> For John Shocked:
> http://www.cox.com/policy/#aup_14
> # Newsgroups.
> Messages posted to newsgroups must comply with the written charters or FAQs for those newsgroups.
> You are responsible for determining the policies of a given newsgroup before posting to it.
State how these messages are inconsistent with the sci.med.diseases.cancer Newsgroup.
There is no question that the content of the message sent is consistent with the content of the
sci.med Newsgroups, which I have subscribed to and read.
I will continue to post to these Newsgroups and I encourage others not to be concerned about these
scare tactics from Hollywood Homosexual hacks.
Dissemination of the truth about an issue so grave takes priority over the concerns of homosexuals
not have the truth exposed about how they have in the past and continue to put the general population
in danger through their personal habits and malicious contamination of the medical industry blood supply.
Politics
============================================================ ========
The available evidence clearly shows that the HIV AIDS virus originated in the homosexual community in the US and
their involvement in medical experiments to address certain forms of cancer and other ailments homosexuals were spreading
to each other in the 1970's. From that interaction between US homosexuals and the US medical research community,
the HIV AIDS virus was spread to the black population in the Congo, Africa in projects in which the
US medical community claimed to be helping out in Africa.
Then US homosexuals spread the HIV AIDS virus to the black community in the US and the medical blood supply,
by giving blood to hospitals and the Red Cross, knowing full well that their blood was diseased, hoping that by spreading
the disease to non-homosexuals, more research funds would be allocated to finding a cure to this disease.
Note that this is entirely consistent with the selfish attitude of the right wing libertarian Hollywood Homosexual community
in general, which has been discussed here.
In fact there are still legal battles with homosexuals giving blood to this day.
Any blood borne disease will spread fastest in the homosexual community for two reasons:
1) homosexuals have an incredible number of homosexual partners in a brief period of time, and
2) the homosexual act involves an unnatural act bringing a hard object with force and unnatural repetitive friction
within the anal tract, which causes cuts and blood admixes with the diseased ejaculate, spreading disease through
the anal cuts and through the soft tissue of the urethra and prepuce.
A few years after the claimed AIDS 'discovery' in Africa, another dangerous disease, Ebola, was claimed to have been
'discovered' in exactly the same country, The Congo, in Africa, where the US medical community had established
a base of operations and medical experimentation.
The fact that most people in the US believe that AIDS originated in Africa is just another one of those amazing
public relations coups which results from the overwhelming stranglehold that Hollywood Homosexuals
possess over the News Media, which they also abuse to sell Sodomy to you and your kids on TV in BSG
and other fake science fiction series.
Ultimately, it is in the interests of every American to ascertain the truth about where these 2 diseases and
other more recent diseases originated.
If the US people knew where those two diseases really originated, they would want to know why we are spending
so much money funding biological research in the US when these research operations are in fact the source of these
new diseases, carefully spreading these diseases so that the biological research industry can continue to siphon off
huge amounts of billions of dollars from the US taxpayer, claiming to search for cures.
Politics
============================================================ ==================
==========================excerpt from alt.battlestar-galactica============================
===========SNL Patrick Stewart 1994 Appearance #6 -- skits opposing ST:DS9 Sodomy direction========
><pbowles [at] aol.com> wrote in message news:1122192809.496225.127220 [at] o13g2000cwo.googlegroups.com...
>><pbow... [at] aol.com> wrote in message news:1122078686.441569.118160 [at] g44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>>>><pbow... [at] aol.com> wrote in message
>>>>news:1121912695.386719.290100 [at] f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>The article clearly shows that these claims of the Sailor or the Bantu man were false alarms.
>It makes no mention of the Bantu man at all. Since I'd never heard of
>the sailor before this, I don't know how credible those claims were to
>begin with.
It does mention the Bantu man.
==================================================
http://www.africaspeaks.com/articles/2005/0903.html
The 1959 specimen was obtained from a Bantu man living in Kinshasa, the Congo. His name and health status were
not recorded. Details of the history and testing of this specimen (later heralded as the "world's oldest HIV-
positive blood sample") are recorded in The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS [1999], by
journalist Edward Hooper who theorizes that HIV was introduced into Africans via the polio vaccine programs in
the late 1950s. Hooper claims the polio vaccine was prepared using chimp kidney cells contaminated with the
ancestor virus of HIV.
When tested for HIV in the mid-1980s, the 1959 blood sample was the only specimen out of 700 stored frozen
Congo bloods that tested positive for HIV. Originally collected by Arno Motulsky on a Rockefeller grant, the
African sample was one of many sent to the University of Washington in Seattle and used for genetic testing
and included in report, "Population Genetic Studies," published in 1966.
Around 1970, the remaining 672 frozen bloods were flown to Emory University in Atlanta for further genetic
tests. In 1985 the specimens again changed hands, this time for HIV testing by Andre Nahmias, a virologist and
animal researcher associated with the Yerkes Primate Center at Emory. The Congo specimens were tested along
with 500 other blood specimens taken from blacks living in sub-Saharan Africa between the years 1959 and 1982.
Initially over 90% of specimens taken in 1959 tested positive for HIV by the ELISA test. However, these HIV-
positive tests were later determined to be false-positive. After the examinations at Emory, the specimens were
shipped to Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for HIV testing in Max Essex' lab.
==================================================
>> The writer describes how 700 other contemporary Congo
>>blood samples tested negative and that there was widespread contamination of these labs
>>at the time causing false positives.
>Firstly we don't know they were contemporary - it just said 700 samples
>were tested, and that one of them was from 1959. Secondly we have no
>reason to believe the first victim's sample was among them. Thirdly
>this study was from 1966 and the BBC article referring to the Bantu man
>was from 2004 - given that the information from this study is publicly
>available, researchers in the area would be fully aware of its findings
>and would incorporate them into their understanding of the history of
>the disease.
The article does state that the initial 700 blood samples were taken in 1959
" Initially over 90% of specimens taken in 1959 tested positive for HIV by the ELISA test."
>>Nowadays, scientists hunt for "ancestor" viruses of HIV in chimps in the African wild and
>>ignore all the immunosuppressive viruses that were created in virus laboratories shortly before AIDS.
>What's more they've found said ancestor virus, as mentioned in the BBC
>article. In chimps (well, bonobos) no less.
By 2004, the final test (1959 Bantu sample now completely used up, they claim) on the Bantu man's blood had
been performed by David Ho with the latest DNA testing PCR technology and he did not find the live virus or
even full evidence of the prior presence of the whole DNA of the virus. This taken with the contaminations known
to have occurred in the labs through which this sample passed calls this test into question.
The HIV virus is claimed by these researchers to mutate, making it difficult for them to successfully falsify the exact 1959
version of the virus. Thus it appears they contaminated it with a dead fragment of the virus, to fake it in an untraceable way.
========================================================
http://www.aidsorigins.com/glossary.shtml
GENOME Total genetic material of a cell or virus.
PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) Process involving isolation and amplification of a
specific DNA sequence which can then be studied.
VIRION Single, complete virus particle, consisting of a core of nucleic acid, within a protein envelope.
VIRUS Minute infectious agent, only able to multiply inside a living host cell.
========================================================
>>"As soon as homosexuals signed up as guinea pigs for government-sponsored hepatitis B vaccine
>>experiments, they began to die with a strange virus of unknown origin."
>This is a claim. Evidence would involve identifying whether any
>particular homosexuals given the vaccine died from the "strange virus"
>afterwards, and any evidence that that virus was in fact AIDS. This
>claim could simply mean that after one or two homosexuals in Manhattan
>volunteered for the vaccine a few on the other side of the island died,
>in which case there would be no connection at all. If Cantwell had any
>evidence of specific cases he would have presented it here.
The fact that they began to die immediately, indicates that these homosexuals may already
have contracted the AIDS virus and had reduced immune systems or had their immune systems
depleted by drugs as Cantwell described.
>>"In order to induce primates and other research animals to acquire cancer, their immune system
>>was deliberately suppressed by drugs, radiation, or cancer-causing chemicals or substances.
>>The thymus gland and/or the spleen were removed, and viruses were injected into
>>newborn animals or into the womb of pregnant animals. Some animals were injected with
>>malaria to keep them chronically sick and immunodepressed."
>So...these poor infected homosexuals were kept in laboratory conditions
>for weeks or months with their immune system being periodically
>suppressed by drugs, radiation and possibly malaria? There isn't some
>'magic bullet' you can inject someone with that then leaves their
>immune system crippled for life - this sort of study can only be
>carried out with repeated exposure to the immune suppressant.
It is obvious that immunodepression is an important factor in biological viral research.
And this research was dovetailing with 'discovery' of another virus, Ebola, which suspiciously was also 'first 'discovered'
in Congo (formerly Zaire), Africa. African governments should be very suspicious about any westerner coming to their
country claiming to be a medical researcher.
==============================================
http://www.d2ol.com/ebola.html
Ebola hemorrhagic fever (Ebola HF) is a severe, often-fatal disease in humans and nonhuman
primates (monkeys and chimpanzees) that has appeared sporadically since its initial recognition in 1976.
The disease is caused by infection with Ebola virus, named after a river in the Democratic Republic
of the Congo (formerly Zaire) in Africa, where it was first recognized.
==============================================
>> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0917211251/ref =cm_aya_a...
>>Interesting that of all the 4 Amazon reviews written by Amazon's customers, you picked the
>>only one which did not give the Cantwell book 5 stars out of 5 stars, but gave it 3 of 5 instead.
[>I 'picked' the one that came up when I typed "Alan Cantwell" + review
>into the search engine. Strangely enough, none of the other three
>review the book in any detail (comments along the lines of "Yeah! I
>knew it!" aren't really that persuasive) and none attempts a critique
>of what he writes. Again, the claim that he provides no evidence, made
>by the reviewer I cited, is a factual one open to investigation if you
>wish to dispute it. Given the citations you've provided to date, it so
>far seems a wholly accurate analysis.] -- JS did not write this
[>Cantwell seems to be describing disposal of the primates that he learnt from documentation
> and it seems there was not a standing policy to destroy any primate after 'inoculation' testing,
>which might even be illegal.] -- JS wrote this.
I am tiring of your posting text you wrote as mine with indenting indicating I wrote it
and vice versa.
What is clear is the US biological researchers were in Africa during the mid-1970's, so
there is no necessity that the primates they imported from Congo had to be returned
to Congo for US researchers to have started these diseases in Africa.
The two claims of 'discovery' of both Ebola and AIDS in Congo, Africa
is extremely suspicious.
============================================================ ======
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: BSG, Sodomy and the Origin of AIDS [message #147670 ] |
Do, 13 Oktober 2005 03:36 |
|
I have a question for T Conner.
Are you an MD?
If not then I didn't meet you and your wife in Merced.
If it is you, hello.
hoof <carefully not mentioning the City where T, Conner practices in RL>
Tom Conner wrote:
>
> "John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:O5h3f.72325$lq6.53317 [at] fed1read01...
>
> Please forward all posts by this fool to abuse [at] cox.net. He is violating the
> Cox Acceptable Use Policy by spamming off-topic, hate-filled, and libelous
> posts to multiple groups, which violates the AUP.
> http://www.cox.com/policy/
>
> Be sure to include the post headers and a brief note as to why the fool is
> being reported.
--
{ Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this poast
were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
{If you have a problem with that,
take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
A Free Thinker.
|
|
|
| Re: BSG, Sodomy and the Origin of AIDS [message #147671 ] |
Do, 13 Oktober 2005 04:07 |
|
"Tom Conner" <tconner [at] olopha.net> wrote in message news:_Ri3f.406$hY6.106 [at] newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> "John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:O5h3f.72325$lq6.53317 [at] fed1read01...
> Please forward all posts by this fool to abuse [at] cox.net. He is violating the
> Cox Acceptable Use Policy by spamming off-topic, hate-filled, and libelous
> posts to multiple groups, which violates the AUP.
> http://www.cox.com/policy/
> Be sure to include the post headers and a brief note as to why the fool is being reported.
How could a thread about AIDS and its related cancer and hepatitis diseases possibly
be off topic for any of these selected Newsgroups ?
There is no hate in these posts. Truth, definitely. Light, definitely.
Politics
============================================================ =================
The available evidence clearly shows that the HIV AIDS virus originated in the homosexual community in the US and
their involvement in medical experiments to address certain forms of cancer and other ailments homosexuals were spreading
to each other in the 1970's. From that interaction between US homosexuals and the US medical research community,
the HIV AIDS virus was spread to the black population in the Congo, Africa in projects in which the
US medical community claimed to be helping out in Africa.
Then US homosexuals spread the HIV AIDS virus to the black community in the US and the medical blood supply,
by giving blood to hospitals and the Red Cross, knowing full well that their blood was diseased, hoping that by spreading
the disease to non-homosexuals, more research funds would be allocated to finding a cure to this disease.
Note that this is entirely consistent with the selfish attitude of the right wing libertarian Hollywood Homosexual community
in general, which has been discussed here.
In fact there are still legal battles with homosexuals giving blood to this day.
Any blood borne disease will spread fastest in the homosexual community for two reasons:
1) homosexuals have an incredible number of homosexual partners in a brief period of time, and
2) the homosexual act involves an unnatural act bringing a hard object with force and unnatural repetitive friction
within the anal tract, which causes cuts and blood admixes with the diseased ejaculate, spreading disease through
the anal cuts and through the soft tissue of the urethra and prepuce.
A few years after the claimed AIDS 'discovery' in Africa, another dangerous disease, Ebola, was claimed to have been
'discovered' in exactly the same country, The Congo, in Africa, where the US medical community had established
a base of operations and medical experimentation.
The fact that most people in the US believe that AIDS originated in Africa is just another one of those amazing
public relations coups which results from the overwhelming stranglehold that Hollywood Homosexuals
possess over the News Media, which they also abuse to sell Sodomy to you and your kids on TV in BSG
and other fake science fiction series.
Ultimately, it is in the interests of every American to ascertain the truth about where these 2 diseases and
other more recent diseases originated.
If the US people knew where those two diseases really originated, they would want to know why we are spending
so much money funding biological research in the US when these research operations are in fact the source of these
new diseases, carefully spreading these diseases so that the biological research industry can continue to siphon off
huge amounts of billions of dollars from the US taxpayer, claiming to search for cures.
Politics
============================================================ =======================
============================================================ =======================
http://www.africaspeaks.com/articles/2005/0903.html
Blaming Gays, Blacks, and Chimps for AIDS Are species-jumping animal virus experiments responsible for the HIV
Holocaust? By Alan Cantwell, Jr., M.D. - 2001 Posted: March 09, 2005
Since the beginning of the AIDS epidemic there have been persistent rumors that the disease was man-made, and
that HIV was deliberately "introduced" into the American gay and the African black populations as a germ
warfare experiment. This so-called conspiracy theory was quickly squelched by virologists and molecular
biolologists, who blamed primates in the African bush and human sexuality for the introduction and spread of
HIV.
In the fall of 1986 the Soviets shocked the world by claiming that HIV was secretly developed at Fort Detrick,
the U.S. Army's biological warfare unit. Although the claim was dismissed as "infectious propaganda", Russian
scientists had worked hand in hand with biological warfare scientists in the transfer of viruses and virus-
infected tissue into various non-human primates (monkeys, apes, chimps) during the 1970s before AIDS appeared.
With improved international relationships, the Russian accusation vanished.
Although evidence supporting the man-made theory has never been mentioned in the major U.S. media, the theory
continues to be ridiculed. For example, in the San Francisco Chronicle,( "Quest for the Origin of AIDS",
January 14, 2001), William Carlsen writes: "In the early years of the AIDS epidemic, theories attempting to
explain the origin of the disease ranged from the comic to the bizarre: a deadly germ escaped from a secret
CIA laboratory; God sent the plague down to punish homosexuals and drug addicts; it came from outer space,
riding on the tail of a comet." AIDS certainly did not come from the hand of God or outer space. However,
there is ample evidence to suspect the hand of man in the outbreak of AIDS that first began in the late 1970s
in New York City.
Creating AIDS in animals before the epidemic
Lost in the history of AIDS is evidence pointing to HIV as a virus whose origin traces back to animal cancer
retrovirus experimentation in the "pre-AIDS" years of the 1960s and 70s. Evidence linking the introduction of
HIV into gays and blacks via vaccine experiments and programs in the late 1970s has been totally ignored in
favor of the politically correct theory claiming that HIV originated in chimpanzees in the African rain
forest, and that HIV "jumped species" into the African population around 1930 or even earlier.
Conveniently overlooked is the series of outbreaks of AIDS-like epidemics that broke out in U.S. primate
centers, beginning in 1969. A decade before AIDS, the first of five recorded epidemics of "simian AIDS"
erupted in a colony of stump-tailed macaques housed in a primate lab at Davis, California. Most of the
macaques died. Two types of primate immunodeficiency viruses were eventually discovered as the cause. A few
silently infected monkeys transferred to the primate colony at Yerkes in Atlanta subsequently died of simian
AIDS in the late 1980s. Veterinarians claim the origin of the simian AIDS outbreak is unknown. However, one
obvious possibility is the experimental transfer of viruses between various primate species, which is common
practice in animal laboratories.
In 1974 veterinarians actually created an AIDS-like disease when newborn chimps were removed from their
mothers and weaned exclusively on virus-infected milk from cows infected with "bovine C-type virus." Within a
year the chimps died of leukemia and pneumocystis pneumonia (the "gay pneumonia" of AIDS). Both diseases had
never been observed in chimps before this virus-transfer experiment. Also downplayed is the laboratory
creation of feline leukemia and "cat AIDS" by the transfer of HIV-like cat retroviruses in the mid-1970s.
These experiments were conducted at Harvard by Myron (Max) Essex, later to become a famous AIDS researcher.
All this man-made creation of AIDS in laboratory animals directly preceded the "mysterious" 1979 introduction
of HIV into gay men, the most hated minority in America. Nowadays, scientists hunt for "ancestor" viruses of
HIV in chimps in the African wild and ignore all the immunosuppressive viruses that were created in virus
laboratories shortly before AIDS. No consideration is given to any of these lab viruses as possible man-made
ancestors of the many "strains" of HIV (and HIV-2) that jumped species to produce AIDS in humans.
The gay experiments that preceded AIDS (1978-1981)
Scientists also discount any connection between the official outbreak of AIDS in 1981 and the experimental
hepatitis B vaccine program (1978-1981) at the New York Blood Center in Manhattan that used gays as guinea
pigs shortly before the epidemic. Curiously, the exact origin of AIDS in the United States remains unstudied.
Health authorities simply blame promiscuous gay men, but never adequately explain how a black heterosexual
African disease could have transformed itself exclusively into a white young gay male disease in Manhattan.
Researchers claim HIV incubated in Africa for more that a half century until AIDS broke out there in 1982.
However, in the U.S. there was no incubation period for gay men. As soon as homosexuals signed up as guinea
pigs for government-sponsored hepatitis B vaccine experiments, they began to die with a strange virus of
unknown origin. The hepatitis B experiments began in Manhattan in the fall of 1978; the first few cases of
AIDS (all young gays from Manhattan) were reported to the CDC in 1979.
Scientists have also failed to explain how a brand new herpes virus was also introduced exclusively into gays,
along with HIV, in the late 1970s. This herpes virus is now believed to be the cause of Kaposi's sarcoma, the
so-called "gay cancer" of AIDS. Before AIDS, Kaposi's sarcoma was never seen in healthy young men. Identified
a decade after HIV, in 1994, this KS virus is closely related to a primate cancer-causing herpes virus
extensively studied and transferred in animal laboratories in the decade before AIDS.
Also downplayed to the public is a new microbe (Mycoplasma penetrans), also of unknown origin, that was
introduced into homosexuals, along with HIV and the new herpes virus. Thus, not one but three new infectious
agents were inexplicably transferred into the gay population at the start of the epidemic (HIV, the herpes KS
virus, and M.penetrans).
In his book, Virus [2000], Luc Montagnier (the French virologist who co-discovered HIV) blames promiscuous
American gay tourists for bringing this new mycoplasma to Africa, and for bringing back HIV. He provides no
evidence for this homophobic theory. Nor does he mention the various mycoplasmas that were passed around in
the 1970s in scientific labs, and the fact that these microbes were frequent contaminants in virus cultures
and vaccines. Why are all these simultaneous introductions of new infectious agents into gay men ignored by
scientists? Surely a credible explanation would be important in determining the origin of HIV and AIDS.
Why are scientists so opposed to the man-made theory? And why do they believe so passionately in the chimp
theory? One explanation might be that scientists don't want the public to know what happened to the tens of
thousands of imported primates who were held captive in laboratories throughout the world in the decade before
AIDS.
The forgotten Special Virus Cancer Program (1964-1977)
Rarely mentioned by AIDS scientists and media reporters is the fact that surgeons have been transplanting
chimpanzee parts (and chimp viruses) into people for decades. When Keith Reemtsma died in June 2000, at age
74, he was hailed as a pioneer in cross-species organ transplants (now known as xenotransplantation). By 1964
he had already placed six chimpanzee kidneys into six patients. All his patients died, but eventually Reemtsma
succeeded in many successful human-to-human organ transplants.
Much more likely to have spread primate (chimp and monkey) viruses to human beings is the largely forgotten
Special Virus Cancer Program (SVCP). This research program was responsible for the development, the
production, the seeding, and the deployment of various animal cancer and immunosuppressive AIDS-like viruses
and retroviruses. These laboratory created viruses were capable of inducing disease when transferred between
animal species and also when transplanted into human cells and tissue. The SVCP began in 1964 as a government-
funded program of the National Cancer Institute (NCI) in Bethesda, Maryland. Originally designed to study
leukemia, the program was soon enlarged to study all forms of cancer. The scope of the program was
international and included scientists from Japan, Sweden, Italy, the Netherlands, Israel, and Africa. The
mission of the SVCP was to collect various human and animal cancers from around the world and to grow large
amounts of cancer causing viruses. As a result, thousands of liters of dangerous man-made viruses were adapted
to human cells and shipped around the world to various laboratories. The annual reports of the SVCP contain
proof that species jumping of animal viruses was a common occurrence in labs a decade before AIDS.
The SVCP gathered together the nation's top virologists, biochemists, immunologists, molecular biologists, and
epidemiologists, to determine the role of viruses and retroviruses in the production of human cancer. Many of
the most prestigious medical institutions were involved in this program. Connected with the SVCP were the most
famous future American AIDS scientists, such as Robert Gallo (the co-discoverer of HIV), Max Essex of "cat
AIDS" fame, and Peter Duesberg, who claims HIV does not cause AIDS. Gallo and Essex were also the first to
promote the widely accepted African green monkey theory of AIDS. This theory was proven erroneous as far back
as 1988, but was heavily circulated among AIDS educators and the media until the theory was superceded by the
chimp theory in the late 1990s.
Biowarfare research, primate research and the SVCP
Also joining forces with the SVCP at the NCI were the military's biological warfare researchers. On October
18, 1971, President Richard Nixon announced that the army's biowarfare laboratories at nearby Fort Detrick,
Maryland, would be converted to cancer research. As part of Nixon's so-called War on Cancer, the military
biowarfare unit was retitled the new Frederick Cancer Research Center, and Litton Bionetics was named as the
military's prime contractor for this project. According to the 1971 SVPC annual report, the primary task of
the now jointly connected National Cancer Institute-Frederick Cancer Research Center was "the large scale
production of oncogenic (cancer-causing) and suspected oncogenic viruses to meet research needs on a
continuing basis."
Special attention was given to primate viruses (the alleged African source of HIV) and "the successful
propagation of significant amounts of human candidate viruses." Candidate viruses were animal or human viruses
that might cause human cancers. For these experiments a steady supply of research animals (monkeys,
chimpanzees, mice, and cats) was necessary; and multiple breeding colonies were established for the SVCP.
Primates were shipped in from West Africa and Asia for experimentation; and virus-infected animals were
shipped out to various labs worldwide. By 1971, a total of 2,274 primates had been inoculated at Bionetics
Research Laboratories, under contract to Fort Detrick. Over 1000 of these monkeys had already died or had been
transferred to other primate centers. (Some animals were eventually released back into the wild).
By the early 1970s, experimenters had transferred cancer-causing viruses into several species of monkeys, and
had also isolated a monkey virus (Herpesvirus saimiri) that would have a close genetic relationship to the new
Kaposi's sarcoma herpes virus that produced the "gay cancer" of AIDS in 1979.
In order to induce primates and other research animals to acquire cancer, their immune system was deliberately
suppressed by drugs, radiation, or cancer-causing chemicals or substances. The thymus gland and/or the spleen
were removed, and viruses were injected into newborn animals or into the womb of pregnant animals. Some
animals were injected with malaria to keep them chronically sick and immunodepressed.
The U.S. is the world's leading consumer of primates, and 55,000 are used yearly in medical research. Primates
(especially newborn and baby chimpanzees) are the most favored lab animals because they are similar
biochemically and immunologically to human beings. Humans share 98.4% of their DNA with chimpanzees. Chimps
were extensively used by SVCP because there would be no official testing of "candidate" lab viruses on humans.
In the decade before AIDS, Gallo was a project officer of a primate study contracted by Bionetics that pumped
cancerous human tissue, as well as a variety of chicken and monkey viruses, into newborn macaques (a small
species of monkey that carries a close relative of the KS virus). Recorded in the 1971 SVCP report
(NIH-71-2025), Gallo's project notes state: "Inasmuch as tests for the biological activity of candidate human
viruses will not be tested in the human species, it is imperative that another system be developed for these
determinations, and subsequently for the evaluation of vaccines or other measures of control. The close
phylogenetic relationship of the lower primates to man justifies utilization of these animals for these
purposes."
Researchers at Bionetics injected human and animal cancer material into various species of monkeys to
determine the cancer effect. Newborn and irradiated monkeys were injected with blood ("using multiple sites
and volumes as large as possible") taken from various forms of human leukemia. In other studies, tissue
cultures infected with various animal viruses were inoculated into primates. How many "new" and "emerging"
viruses were created and adapted to human tissue and to various primates is not known.
Some primates were released back into the wild carrying lab viruses with them. The possible spread of these
lab viruses to other animals in the wild has been ignored by scientists searching for the origin of HIV and
its close relatives in African animals. Cats were also bred for leukemia and sarcoma cancer studies. Germ free
colonies of inbred mice were established. Mouse cancer viruses were manipulated to produce resistant and non-
resistant strains. These adapted viruses would be employed in the 1980s in human gene replacement experiments.
Such experiments utilized a weakened strain of the mouse leukemia virus to infect and "taxi-in" the missing
genes to genetically-defective human beings.
The end of the SVCP and the birth of AIDS
By 1977 the SVCP came to an inglorious end. According to Gallo, "Scientifically, the problem was that no one
could supply clear evidence of any kind of human tumor virus, not even a DNA virus, and most researchers
refused to concede that viruses played any role in human cancers. Politically, the Virus Cancer Program was
vulnerable because it attracted a great deal of money and attention and had failed to produce dramatic,
visible results."
Despite all this, the SVCP was the birthplace of genetic engineering, molecular biology, and the human genome
project. More than any other program it built up the field of animal retrovirology, which led to the vital
understanding of cancer and immunosuppressive retroviruses in humans.
As the SVCP was winding down, thousands of gay men were signing up as guinea pigs in government-sponsored
hepatitis B vaccine experiments in New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. These same cities would soon
become the three primary epicenters for the new "gay-related immune deficiency syndrome," later known as AIDS.
Two years after the termination of the SCVP, the introduction of HIV into gay men (along with a herpes virus
and a mycoplasma) miraculously revived retroviral research and made Gallo the most famous scientist in the
world. Could virus-contaminated hepatitis vaccines lie at the root of AIDS?
In the early 1970s the hepatitis B vaccine was developed in chimpanzees. To this day, some people are fearful
about taking the hepatitis B vaccine because of its original connection to gay men and AIDS. Was HIV (and the
KS herpes virus and a new mycoplasma) introduced into gays during these vaccine trials when thousands of
homosexuals were injected in Manhattan beginning in 1978, and in the West Coast cities in 1980-1981?
As mentioned, the first gay AIDS cases erupted in Manhattan a few months after the gay experiment began at the
NY Blood Center. When a blood test for HIV became available in the mid-1980s, the Center's stored gay blood
specimens were reexamined. Most astonishing is the statistically significant fact that 20% of the gay men who
volunteered for the hepatitis B experiment in New York were discovered to be HIV-positive in 1980 (a year
before the AIDS epidemic became "official" in 1981). This signifies that Manhattan gays in 1980 had the
highest incidence of HIV anywhere in the world, including Africa, the supposed birthplace of HIV and AIDS. And
epidemic cases in Africa did not appear until 1982.
Although denied by the AIDS establishment, a few researchers are convinced that these vaccine experiments
served as the vehicle through which HIV was introduced into the gay population. My own extensive research into
the hepatitis B experiments is presented in AIDS and the Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origin of the
AIDS Epidemic [1988], and in Queer Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot [1993]. These books also debunk the
preposterous "Patient Zero" story of 1987, which claimed a promiscuous gay Canadian airline steward brought
AIDS to America. The highly implausible story was sensationalized in the media and served to further obscure
the origin of AIDS in America and blame gay promiscuity. Even Montagnier is doubtful that the U.S. epidemic
could have developed from a single patient.
Never mentioned by proponents of the chimp theory is the fact that the New York Blood Center established a
chimp virus laboratory in West Africa in 1974. One of the purposes of VILAB II, at the Liberian Institute for
Biomedical Research in Robertsfield, Liberia, was to develop the hepatitis B vaccine in chimps. A few years
later this vaccine was inoculated into gays at the Center. Chimps were captured from various parts of West
Africa and brought to VILAB. Alfred Prince, Head of virology at the NY Blood Center, has been the director of
Vilab for the past 25 years. The lab prides itself by releasing "rehabilitated" chimps back into the wild.
Also closely allied with "pre-AIDS" development of a hepatitis B vaccine is the little publicized primate
colony outside New York City called LEMSIP (the Laboratory for Experimental Medicine and Surgery). Until
disbanded in 1997, LEMSIP supplied New York area scientists with primates and primate parts for
transplantation and virus research. Founded in 1965, LEMSIP was affiliated with the New York University
Medical Center, where the first cases of AIDS-associated Kaposi's sarcoma were discovered in 1979. Researchers
at NYU Medical Center were also heavily involved in the development of the experimental hepatitis B vaccine
used in gays; and the Medical Center received government grants and contracts connected with biological
warfare research beginning in 1969, according to Leonard Horowitz, author of Emerging Viruses: AIDS and Ebola
[1996].
Scientific disinformation and the 1959 HIV-positive blood test from Africa
By predating HIV back to the 1930s, the chimp theory effectively discredits the man-made theory of AIDS, which
dates the introduction of HIV to the late 1970s. Only time will tell whether the chimp theory will hold up to
further scientific scrutiny.
Conspiracy theorists believe some wildly popular AIDS origin stories in the press reek of scientific
disinformation. One example is the Patient Zero story. Another is the media blitz surrounding the English
sailor who supposedly contracted AIDS in 1959. This now-disproven story made worldwide headlines in 1990 and
obviously served to contradict the underground conspiracy theory (particularly among African-Americans) that
AIDS was man-made. The New York Times (July 24, 1990) declared: "The case also refutes the widely publicized
charges made by Soviet officials several years ago that AIDS arose from a virus that had escaped from a
laboratory experiment that went awry or was a biological warfare agent. The human retrovirus group to which
the AIDS virus belongs was unknown at the time. Nor did scientists then have the genetic engineering
techniques needed to create a virus." Several years later, the case was discovered to be not a case of AIDS
because the sailor's tissue remains were accidentally (or deliberately) contaminated with HIV.
In 1998 the media alerted the public to further evidence that AIDS started in Africa. The proof consisted of
an old 1959 stored frozen blood specimen discovered to be HIV-positive. Researchers claimed the tiny amount of
serum contained fragments of HIV "closely related" to a virus found in 3 chimpanzees in the African wild and
in the frozen remains of a chimp named Marilyn, discovered in a freezer at Fort Detrick.
The 1959 specimen was obtained from a Bantu man living in Kinshasa, the Congo. His name and health status were
not recorded. Details of the history and testing of this specimen (later heralded as the "world's oldest HIV-
positive blood sample") are recorded in The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS [1999], by
journalist Edward Hooper who theorizes that HIV was introduced into Africans via the polio vaccine programs in
the late 1950s. Hooper claims the polio vaccine was prepared using chimp kidney cells contaminated with the
ancestor virus of HIV.
When tested for HIV in the mid-1980s, the 1959 blood sample was the only specimen out of 700 stored frozen
Congo bloods that tested positive for HIV. Originally collected by Arno Motulsky on a Rockefeller grant, the
African sample was one of many sent to the University of Washington in Seattle and used for genetic testing
and included in report, "Population Genetic Studies," published in 1966.
Around 1970, the remaining 672 frozen bloods were flown to Emory University in Atlanta for further genetic
tests. In 1985 the specimens again changed hands, this time for HIV testing by Andre Nahmias, a virologist and
animal researcher associated with the Yerkes Primate Center at Emory. The Congo specimens were tested along
with 500 other blood specimens taken from blacks living in sub-Saharan Africa between the years 1959 and 1982.
Initially over 90% of specimens taken in 1959 tested positive for HIV by the ELISA test. However, these HIV-
positive tests were later determined to be false-positive. After the examinations at Emory, the specimens were
shipped to Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, for HIV testing in Max Essex' lab.
Three specimens initially tested HIV-positive, but finally only the 1959 specimen from the unidentified Bantu
man was confirmed HIV-positive. Around the time of these examinations, Essex's lab was unknowingly
contaminated with primate viruses. In 1986, Essex discovered a new "human" AIDS virus that later proved to be
a contaminating monkey virus. The source of the primate virus traced back to a captive monkey at a primate
center in nearby Southborough, Massachusetts. This primate contamination at his lab resulted in the erroneous
green monkey theory, heavily popularized by Gallo and the media.
Also unpublicized is the little known fact that Gallo's lab at the National Cancer Institute was plagued with
contamination by primate viruses. In 1975 he reported a new human "HL-23" virus that eventually proved to be
three contaminating ape primate viruses (gibbon-ape virus, simian sarcoma virus, and baboon endogenous virus).
Gallo claims he has no idea how these viruses contaminated his research.
In 1996 Hooper convinced Nahmias to turn over the remaining 1959 specimen to David Ho of Rockefeller
University in Manhattan for PCR testing. In 1996 Ho was named Time magazine's "Man of the Year", at a time
when few people had ever heard of him. Ho is also the director of the Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center,
affiliated with Rockefeller University since 1996. The Diamond Center is also now connected with the New York
Blood Center, home of the gay vaccine experiments that gave birth to AIDS. Ho determined the tiny amount of
the remaining specimen did not contain live virus, nor was the complete virion of the virus present. Instead,
some fragments of the virus (about 15% of the total genome) were tested and presented to the scientific world
as the oldest specimen of HIV in the world. Ho's PCR results cannot be confirmed by independent investigators
because the 1959 specimen is now totally used up.
When published in the journal Nature on February 5, 1998 ("An African HIV-1 sequence from 1959 and
implications for the origin of the epidemic"), Hooper's name appeared on the report, along with Ho, Bette
Korber, Nahmias, and others, The report was heavily publicized as proof that HIV existed in the African
population in 1959. Although there are no HIV-positive tissue specimens from Africa from the 1960s and 1970s,
and no proven cases of AIDS either, Hooper relies heavily on this 1959 test to support his theory that HIV
entered the African population via the polio vaccines programs in the late 1950s.
In The River Hooper quickly dismisses the claims of physician Robert Strecker, the first whistle-blower of
man-made AIDS, as well as the research in Horowitz's Emerging Viruses, and in my own books, AIDS & The Doctors
of Death, and Queer Blood. In condemning AIDS biowarfare research, Hooper declares, "Sadly, supporters of the
Streckers have continued to peddle their ill-informed and outdated versions of the myth, blaming variously the
Soviets, the CIA, the Germans, and the World Health Organization (WHO) well into the nineties." He dismisses
the hepatitis B vaccine connection to AIDS by noting that only two of the 826 gay vaccinees had developed AIDS
by 1983. Hooper ignores the fact that by 1981 over 20% of the men in the trials were HIV-positive and that by
1982, over 30% of the men were HIV-positive. He dismisses the World Health Organization's African smallpox
vaccine connection by saying, "there is no reason for either HIV or SIV [simian immunodeficiency virus] to be
accidentally present in the vaccine." Hooper fails to consider the possibility that the vaccines could have
been deliberately contaminated with HIV. Hooper has been a United Nations official, but no details of this are
included in his book.
Despite his massive research, Hooper seems naïve about the continuing transfer of viruses between various
primate species at primate centers. For example, in 1995 he interviewed Preston Marx at LEMSIP. At that time
Marx was a representative of David Ho's organization, the Aaron Diamond Research Center. Hooper writes: "I was
shocked by the cavalier way in which tissues and sera from one species had been introduced into other species,
long after the risks of cross-species transfer had been highlighted by the SV40 [polio vaccine] debacle, and I
was astonished that survivors from troops that had been stricken by mystery illnesses could have been casually
sold to other centers, for use in experiments there. Furthermore, this apparent lack of monitoring and central
control seemed to be echoed in other fields, like xenotransplantation (the transplanting of organ or cells
from one species to another) - and here, of course, the implications were even more frightening."
By predating his polio vaccine theory back to the late 1950s, Hooper greatly simplified his theory of AIDS
origin. He ignored all those animal viruses that were placed into human tissue in the 60s and 70s, and all
those dangerous viral creations that were genetically altered for cancer research, vaccine research, and
secret biological warfare.
The chimp in the freezer at Fort Detrick
On February 1, 1999 Lawrence K Altman, longtime physician-writer for The New York Times, dutifully reported
"the riddle of the origin of the AIDS virus has apparently been solved." A team of researchers, headed by
Beatrice Hahn at the University of Alabama, performed viral studies on three chimps in the African wild and
had also studied the frozen remains of a chimp, discovered by accident in a freezer at Fort Detrick. The chimp
had tested positive for HIV in 1985. On the basis of all this research, Hahn declared that a common subspecies
of chimp (Pan troglodytes troglodytes) was the animal source of the virus "most closely " related to HIV.
In a media blitz U.S. government scientists presented a phylogenetic ancestral "family tree" of primate
viruses (which few people could understand) to prove that HIV was genetically descended from a chimp virus in
the African bush. Molecular analysis of virus genetic data, performed by Bette Korber and the supercomputer
Nirvana at the Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico, indicated that HIV had jumped species from a
chimp to a human in Africa around the year 1930. (Los Alamos is the official home of nuclear bomb-building,
alleged Chinese spies, and the laboratory which directed secret human radiation experiments on unsuspecting
civilians from the 1940s up to the beginning of the AIDS epidemic.) Beatrice Hahn theorized that the epidemic
started when a hunter cut himself while butchering chimp meat and subsequently became infected. Scientists
readily accepted Hahn's notion that the AIDS virus and its closest relatives jumped species from chimps to
humans on multiple occasions, thereby explaining the origin of the three separate subtypes of HIV-1 (M, N, and
O), as well as HIV-2. Chimps in West Africa are hunted for food, as well as for medical experimentation. Young
chimps are especially prized for scientific research and are usually caught by shooting their mothers. Many
die from stress and inhumane conditions during capture and transport to laboratories and zoos in Western
nations.
Due to all this killing, chimps are now an endangered species. During the past century the African chimp
population has dropped from two million to less than 150,000. Despite the mass killing of chimps, they are
still blamed for causing the worldwide epidemic of AIDS. Beatrice Hahn is no stranger to primate theories,
having worked in Gallo's lab when he was heavily promoting the green monkey theory in the mid-1980s and the
"close relationship" of the monkey virus to HIV.
Now Hahn's virus was claimed to be a closer relative than the contaminating monkey virus in Essex' lab that
formed the basis of the false green monkey theory. Media journalists paid no attention to these discrepancies.
Hahn's new chimp findings, along with the old 1959 blood specimen, fully convinced the AIDS establishment, and
an adoring media, that Africa was indeed the source of HIV and the AIDS epidemic.
The 2000 London Origin of AIDS Conference
When Hooper's book appeared in the fall of 1998, molecular scientists quickly used the new chimp virus data to
completely discredit Hooper's polio vaccine theory. AIDS in Africa could not be caused by a virus jumping
species in the 50s if it had already jumped species back in the 1930s. Researchers refused to believe
scientists could have played any role in the origin of HIV and AIDS. Hooper bypassed the biowarfare theory by
predating HIV back to the 50s. Now scientists bypassed Hooper by dating HIV back several decades earlier. The
fact that there was no African epidemic until the early 1980s did not seem pertinent. To make their view
official, a small group of scientists proposed an "invitation only" meeting to settle the origin matter once
and for all.
In October 2000 the Royal Society of London held a two-day conference on the origins of HIV. Obviously, the
biowarfare theory of AIDS was not discussed. On the contrary, one professor emphatically declared "all human
infectious diseases have an animal origin." Although there never was a disease like AIDS (until scientists
started to flagrantly pass viruses around to repeatedly break the species barrier), the same professor
declared that "natural transfer of these infections is a common event in animal populations." Using the viral
fragments from the 1959 specimen and comparing them with the select viruses contained in the data bank at Los
Alamos, Betty Korber refined her computer calculations to establish a likely date of 1940, "with confidence
levels extending from 1871 to 1955." The Rega Institute in Antwerp estimated the transfer could have occurred
between 1590 and 1760, with 1675 the most likely date. Hooper spoke but his views were largely ignored by the
molecular biologists. Preston Marx warned about more human diseases caused by viruses emerging from primates,
None of the speakers mentioned what happened to the thousands of liters of animal viruses that were passed
around the world by the Special Virus Cancer Program in the decade before AIDS.
Instead, the London conferees alerted the public to a new view of medical science, championed by the
virologists. The "Last Word" at the conference was that "all human viral infections were initially zoonotic
(animal) in origin. Animals will always provide a reservoir for viruses that could threaten human populations
in the future." And the scientists predicted: "There is still a myriad of current unknown viruses in animal
populations on land, sea, and air with the potential to cause human disease." Apparently, none of these
viruses were in animal laboratories.
AIDS, cancer, genetic science and covert human medical experimentation
Although rejected completely by most scientists, the man-made theory of AIDS is a rational explanation for the
origin of HIV. This theory is partly based on an awareness of the gene-polluting activities and species
jumping virus experiments of irresponsible scientists during the two decades before the epidemic. In addition,
the record clearly shows that scientists and biowarfare scientists experiment secretly on unsuspecting people.
Horrific aspects of the Cold War Human Radiation Experiments attest to the fact that covert medical
experimentation is not an "X-Files" fantasy or a totally paranoid belief. It is easy to understand why
researchers might want to obscure the man-made origin for AIDS and blame primates. It is now apparent that
most of the major researchers promoting the African primate origin of AIDS were connected with the largely
secret Special Virus Cancer Program, or are scientists involved in the transfer of viruses in animal research,
particularly primate research.
From the very beginning of the epidemic, researchers disclaimed any connection between AIDS and cancer, as
well as any connection between HIV and animal retrovirus cancer research. In 1984, Gallo originally named HIV
a cancer-causing "leukemia/lymphoma" virus. To obscure the cancer connection, the name was immediately changed
to "lymphotropic" virus.
My own Kaposi's sarcoma research, first published in medical journals in 1981, showed "cancer-associated
bacteria" as possible infectious agents in "classic" KS tumors. Before HIV was discovered in 1984, additional
papers in 1982 and 1983 showed similar cancer bacteria in the enlarged lymph nodes and KS tumors of gay men
with "gay cancer" and AIDS. Since the 1950s, cancer-associated bacteria have been linked to viruses, as well
as to mycoplasmas. This aspect of cancer research has been suppressed for decades by the cancer establishment.
A history of this research and its relevancy to AIDS is the subject of my books, AIDS: The Mystery and the
Solution [1984] and The Cancer Microbe: The Hidden Killer in Cancer, AIDS and Other Immune Diseases [1990].
Gallo, in his 1991 book, falsely claims that no infectious agent had ever been found in KS. The refusal of
AIDS scientists to recognize cancer microbe research, published in peer reviewed scientific journals, is a
further indication that the AIDS establishment seeks to control all aspects of HIV research in such a way as
to never connect the origin of AIDS with previous cancer research and covert biological warfare research. This
cover-up conceals the possibility that AIDS, in reality, is a new man-made form of infectious and contagious
cancer.
Could a small coterie of government scientists concoct a bogus (but scientifically plausible) primate theory
of AIDS origin and bamboozle the public to believe it in order to cover-up the truth? In the 1930s the highly
respected German scientific community was entirely transformed by fascist beliefs proclaiming the genetic
inferiority of the Jews and the genetic superiority of the German Master Race. This Nazi takeover of science
and the media eventually led to the murder of millions in the Holocaust. Could the genetic science surrounding
the origin of AIDS obscure a genocidal and world depopulation program of man-made origin?
It is time for the man-made theory of HIV to be examined fairly. Proponents of this theory should not be
dismissed as paranoid conspiracy theorists; and AIDS educators should educate themselves about this hidden
history of AIDS and its implications for the origin of HIV. How many more species jumping viruses will we have
to endure before we question the integrity and the agenda of scientists who still blissfully jump viruses
between species in animal laboratories?
Lawrence K. Altman, the Times reporter who in 1999 wrote that the origin of the AIDS virus was solved,
recently asked "Where did AIDS come from?" Now seemingly undecided, Altman answers, "We can only guess.
Determining the answer would be important because discovering how AIDS came to be an epidemic might prevent a
similar catastrophe in the future." ("The AIDS questions that linger," January 30, 2001). It doesn't take a
rocket scientist to figure out how researchers could have created HIV and how they could have transferred the
virus to gay and blacks in a covert medical experimentation for genocidal or population control purposes.
The secrecy and scientific disinformation surrounding the Human Radiation Experiments of the Cold War era has
taught us how easily government scientists can fool the public on scientific matters. And when it comes to
scientific monkey business, researchers know that most people are chumps.
Dr. Cantwell is a retired dermatologist and AIDS and cancer researcher, who has written extensively on the
man-made origin of AIDS. E-mail address: alanrcan [at] aol.com
REFERENCES:
Cantwell AR Jr: Bacteriologic investigation and histologic observations of variably acid-fact bacteria in
three cases of Kaposi's sarcoma. Growth 45: 79-89, 1981.
Cantwell AR Jr: Necroscopic findings of pleomorphic, variably acid-fast bacteria in a fatal case of Kaposi's
sarcoma. Journal of Dermatologic Surgery and Oncology 7: 923-930, 1981.
Cantwell AR Jr: Variably acid-fast bacteria in vivo in a case of reactive lymph node hyperplasia occurring in
a young male homosexual. Growth 46: 331-336, 1982.
Cantwell AR Jr: Kaposi's sarcoma and variably acid-fast bacteria in vivo in two homosexual men. Cutis 32:
58-74, 1983.
Cantwell AR Jr: Necroscopic findings of variably acid-fast bacteria in a fatal case of acquired
immunodeficiency syndrome and Kaposi's sarcoma. Growth 47: 129-134, 1983.
Cantwell Jr, A: AIDS:The Mystery & the Solution. Los Angeles: Aries Rising Press, 1984.
Cantwell Jr, A: AIDS & The Doctors of Death: An Inquiry into the Origin of the AIDS Epidemic. Los Angeles:
Aries Rising Press, 1988.
Cantwell Jr, A: The Cancer Microbe. Los Angeles: Aries Rising Press, 1990.
Cantwell Jr, A: Queer Blood: The Secret AIDS Genocide Plot. Los Angeles: Aries Rising Press, 1993.
Cantwell AR Jr: "Gay cancer, emerging viruses, and AIDS." New Dawn (Melbourne), Sept 1998.
Faden RR (Chair): The Human Radiation Experiments: Final Report of the President's Advisory Committee. New
York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Gallo R: Virus Hunting: AIDS, Cancer and the Human Retrovirus. New York: Basic Books, 1991.
Hooper E: The River: A Journey to the Source of HIV and AIDS. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company, 1999
Horowitz LG: Emerging Viruses: AIDS & Ebola. Rockport, MA: Tetrahedron Publishing Group, 1996.
Lee RE: AIDS: An Explosion of the Biological Time-Bomb? Biographical Publishing Company, Prospect, CT, 2000.
Montagnier L: Virus. New York: WW Norton Co, Inc, 2000.
Special Virus Cancer Program (Progress Report #. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, August 1971.
============================================================ ==============
Politics
|
|
|
| Re: BSG, Sodomy and the Origin of AIDS [message #147673 ] |
Do, 13 Oktober 2005 04:21 |
|
"hoofprints" <equsphotogophr [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message news:434DBA05.9A5AB6D5 [at] hotmail.com...
>I have a question for T Conner.
> Are you an MD?
> If not then I didn't meet you and your wife in Merced.
> If it is you, hello.
> hoof <carefully not mentioning the City where T, Conner practices in RL>
Conner is a regular on the BSG Newsgroup, so I doubt he is a serious doctor with concerns about his Newsgroup.
Conner has been working in concert with the Hollywood Homosexual public relations team here run by Grieda
which is desperate to deflect attention away from the truth in my posts.
If he is married, I hope this wife, if female, is aware of his support for homosexuality and attempted censorship
of AIDS discussions on this Newsgroup.
Politics
> Tom Conner wrote:
>> "John Shocked" <jshocked [at] hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:O5h3f.72325$lq6.53317 [at] fed1read01...
>> Please forward all posts by this fool to abuse [at] cox.net. He is violating the
>> Cox Acceptable Use Policy by spamming off-topic, hate-filled, and libelous
>> posts to multiple groups, which violates the AUP.
>> http://www.cox.com/policy/
>> Be sure to include the post headers and a brief note as to why the fool is being reported.
> { Disclaimer: Non Existent words contained within this post
> were created in response to the Paperwork Reduction Act.}
> {If you have a problem with that,
> take it to the Environmentalists Complaint Dept.}
> A Free Thinker.
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Sa Mai 19 19:14:54 CEST 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,08392 Sekunden |
