| LOL... YES! [message #129187] |
So, 11 September 2005 02:16 |
|
http://tinyurl.com/9eamf
It's not to soon to look ahead. :)
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129196 ] |
So, 11 September 2005 09:56 |
|
Worthless Bullshit. America has big friggin' problems and all you can
do is make jokes about it. You are a Wiccan degenerate psycopath.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129197 ] |
So, 11 September 2005 16:39 |
|
"ToolPackinMama" <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote in message
news:43237743.60606 [at] lauragoodwin.org...
> http://tinyurl.com/9eamf
>
> It's not to soon to look ahead. :)
I don't know. Considering how the mirror universe turned out under Spock, do
we really want him a heartbeat away from all of the buttons. I for one could
do without being a slave(unless it was to the Entendant of course).
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129198 ] |
So, 11 September 2005 18:27 |
|
<urbanasphalt [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1126425379.507212.78900 [at] g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Worthless Bullshit. America has big friggin' problems and all you can
> do is make jokes about it. You are a Wiccan degenerate psycopath.
>
Problem is alot of the current "big friggin' problems" are the fault of the
current idiot in office. I think that bumper sticker maybe is just what we
need.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129201 ] |
So, 11 September 2005 21:25 |
|
"Kirk & Spock in '04"
I've been saying for years now that a Shatner/Nimoy administration is
probably what this country needs. Problem is, Nimoy is a democrat no doubt,
so it probably wouldn't work out well for our country anyway.
"ToolPackinMama" <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote in message
news:43237743.60606 [at] lauragoodwin.org...
> http://tinyurl.com/9eamf
>
> It's not to soon to look ahead. :)
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129202 ] |
So, 11 September 2005 21:27 |
|
"Brian Harrell" <sector221g [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
news:r5adnReXUJty0bneRVn-hA [at] comcast.com...
>
> Problem is alot of the current "big friggin' problems" are the fault of
the
> current idiot in office. I think that bumper sticker maybe is just what we
> need.
So glad that the majority of America apparently does not agree with
you or all of the other left-wing nuts out there.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129203 ] |
So, 11 September 2005 19:58 |
|
ToolPackinMama wrote:
> http://tinyurl.com/9eamf
>
> It's not to soon to look ahead. :)
LOL
--
www.Wouter.Valentijn.name
www.zeppodunsel.nl
www.scifics.com
www.nksf.nl
liam=mail
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129208 ] |
So, 11 September 2005 20:52 |
|
On Sun, 11 Sep 2005 09:27:30 -0700, "Brian Harrell" <sector221g [at] comcast.net>
wrote:
>Problem is alot of the current "big friggin' problems" are the fault of the
>current idiot in office. I think that bumper sticker maybe is just what we
>need.
Nonsense. The big friggin problem is the idiots who blame the current
person in office. Nothing gets done .. good or bad .. with such an
attitude.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129210 ] |
Mo, 12 September 2005 00:33 |
|
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 20:16:03 -0400, ToolPackinMama
<laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
>http://tinyurl.com/9eamf
>
>It's not to soon to look ahead. :)
They have my vote! Right on, Mama!!
--
The Merry Piper
[http://tmpiper.livejournal.com]
If you want to dance, you'll have to pay ... me!
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129215 ] |
Mo, 12 September 2005 07:30 |
|
"CaptainPike" <CaptainPike [at] ev1.net> wrote in message
news:11i8qc875p8q8c3 [at] corp.supernews.com...
> "Brian Harrell" <sector221g [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:r5adnReXUJty0bneRVn-hA [at] comcast.com...
>>
>> Problem is alot of the current "big friggin' problems" are the fault
>> of
> the
>> current idiot in office. I think that bumper sticker maybe is just
>> what we
>> need.
>
> So glad that the majority of America apparently does not agree
> with
> you or all of the other left-wing nuts out there.
Rather, allegedly* a majority of eligible US voters who chose to vote,
at minimum thought him not as bad at the alternate, not that they don't
necessarily acknowledge that he might be responsible for some of the
US's problems.
Karl Johanson
*"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes
decide everything."
-Joseph Stalin
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129216 ] |
Mo, 12 September 2005 15:19 |
|
Brian Harrell wrote:
> <urbanasphalt [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1126425379.507212.78900 [at] g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
>>Worthless Bullshit. America has big friggin' problems and all you can
>>do is make jokes about it. You are a Wiccan degenerate psycopath.
>>
>
>
>
> Problem is alot of the current "big friggin' problems" are the fault of the
> current idiot in office.
No, our biggest problems are the result of an idiot who lived in the 7th
century and claimed he got a message from Allah.
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email: sdlitvin [at] earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129217 ] |
Mo, 12 September 2005 15:21 |
|
Karl Johanson wrote:
> "CaptainPike" <CaptainPike [at] ev1.net> wrote in message
> news:11i8qc875p8q8c3 [at] corp.supernews.com...
>
>>"Brian Harrell" <sector221g [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
>>news:r5adnReXUJty0bneRVn-hA [at] comcast.com...
>>
>>>Problem is alot of the current "big friggin' problems" are the fault
>>>of
>>
>>the
>>
>>>current idiot in office. I think that bumper sticker maybe is just
>>>what we
>>>need.
>>
>> So glad that the majority of America apparently does not agree
>>with
>>you or all of the other left-wing nuts out there.
>
>
> Rather, allegedly* a majority of eligible US voters who chose to vote,
> at minimum thought him not as bad at the alternate, not that they don't
> necessarily acknowledge that he might be responsible for some of the
> US's problems.
"Allegedly"?
In America, in our Federal system, the votes in a Presidential election
are counted in each state separately. The idea that all 50 states could
rig an election simultaneously is just silly.
The problem with all conspiracy theories is they assume that hundreds of
people will simultaneously conspire to keep a secret for many years.
This at a time when classified Government documents are *routinely*
leaked to the news media.
Or as Benjamin Franklin once put it:
"Three may keep a secret--if two of them are dead"
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email: sdlitvin [at] earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129218 ] |
Mo, 12 September 2005 15:25 |
|
ToolPackinMama wrote:
> http://tinyurl.com/9eamf
>
> It's not to soon to look ahead. :)
One of America's greatest presidents combined military (Kirk) and
scientific (Spock) experience: Theodore Roosevelt.
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email: sdlitvin [at] earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129219 ] |
Mo, 12 September 2005 16:42 |
|
Steven L. wrote:
> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>
>> http://tinyurl.com/9eamf
>>
>> It's not to soon to look ahead. :)
>
>
> One of America's greatest presidents combined military (Kirk) and
> scientific (Spock) experience: Theodore Roosevelt.
Yeah, he was one of the great ones.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129220 ] |
Mo, 12 September 2005 16:42 |
|
The Merry Piper wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Sep 2005 20:16:03 -0400, ToolPackinMama
> <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
>
>
>>http://tinyurl.com/9eamf
>>
>>It's not to soon to look ahead. :)
>
>
> They have my vote! Right on, Mama!!
We need them NOW.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129221 ] |
Mo, 12 September 2005 19:13 |
|
<urbanasphalt [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
> Worthless Bullshit. America has big friggin' problems
Quite so. Bush eliminated balanced budgets, such as Clinton had, and is
running massive deficits, adding to the net US debt.
>and all you can
> do is make jokes about it. You are a Wiccan degenerate psycopath.
Oh come on now. Shouldn't you be off somewhere blaming Hillary Clinton
or someone for everything that's wrong with your life?
Karl Johanson
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129223 ] |
Mo, 12 September 2005 20:47 |
|
"Steven L." <sdlitvin [at] earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:SkfVe.9080$4P5.1684 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>
>> http://tinyurl.com/9eamf
>>
>> It's not to soon to look ahead. :)
>
> One of America's greatest presidents combined military (Kirk) and
> scientific (Spock) experience: Theodore Roosevelt.
While the current one seems to combine the business sence of Cyrano
Jones, with the ethics of Harry Mudd.
With Kirk having had confirmed sexuals relations with 2 women, one of
whom was his wife; which recent president can we compare him to...
Karl Johanson
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129230 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 01:07 |
|
"Steven L." <sdlitvin [at] earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:bffVe.9078$4P5.3620 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> > Problem is alot of the current "big friggin' problems" are the fault of
the
> > current idiot in office.
>
> No, our biggest problems are the result of an idiot who lived in the 7th
> century and claimed he got a message from Allah.
>
My God, Steven, how dare you! Why that's .... that's .... hate
speech. That's right. You hater! Even if it is true, what gives you the
right to speak the truth. We must all act as if it isn't. We must all act as
if it is not a proven fact. I mean, that's the 'right' thing to do isn't it?
Put on a big make believe show that we really don't feel that way, when deep
down we know we do, but will never admit it. That's it.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129231 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 00:43 |
|
Karl Johanson wrote:
> With Kirk having had confirmed sexuals relations with 2 women, one of
> whom was his wife; which recent president can we compare him to...
I can't compare Kirk's womanizing to any recent President.
According to Ken Starr's report, Bush's predecessor (what was his name
again?) had told Monica Lewinsky that he had enjoyed "hundreds" of love
affairs, some of which started only months after he got married.
TOS would have had to run for at least 10 seasons for Kirk's womanizing
to equal that track record.
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email: sdlitvin [at] earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129234 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 01:08 |
|
I still can't understand why a man's sex life will get him kicked out of
office, but Bush's unprovoked war is considered acceptable.
"Steven L." <sdlitvin [at] earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:EwnVe.9219$4P5.7724 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Karl Johanson wrote:
>
>> With Kirk having had confirmed sexuals relations with 2 women, one of
>> whom was his wife; which recent president can we compare him to...
>
> I can't compare Kirk's womanizing to any recent President.
> According to Ken Starr's report, Bush's predecessor (what was his name
> again?) had told Monica Lewinsky that he had enjoyed "hundreds" of love
> affairs, some of which started only months after he got married.
>
> TOS would have had to run for at least 10 seasons for Kirk's womanizing to
> equal that track record.
>
>
> --
> Steven D. Litvintchouk
> Email: sdlitvin [at] earthlinkNOSPAM.net
>
> Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129235 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 01:16 |
|
Brian Harrell wrote:
> I still can't understand why a man's sex life will get him kicked out of
> office, but Bush's unprovoked war is considered acceptable.
No American President has ever been removed from office. One resigned
(Nixon).
--
Steven D. Litvintchouk
Email: sdlitvin [at] earthlinkNOSPAM.net
Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129236 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 01:25 |
|
Sorry. I should have rephrased that. People had a problem with Clinton's sex
life as if it was an all important issue. Bush started an unprovoked war and
a lot of good people were killed and that's accepted. I don't understand why
people think sex is bad but war and violence are okay.
"Steven L." <sdlitvin [at] earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message
news:G%nVe.9232$4P5.5541 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
> Brian Harrell wrote:
>
>> I still can't understand why a man's sex life will get him kicked out of
>> office, but Bush's unprovoked war is considered acceptable.
>
> No American President has ever been removed from office. One resigned
> (Nixon).
>
>
> --
> Steven D. Litvintchouk
> Email: sdlitvin [at] earthlinkNOSPAM.net
>
> Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129238 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 03:33 |
|
"Brian Harrell" <sector221g [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
news:LsmdnR1ESdD2l7veRVn-hw [at] comcast.com...
> I still can't understand why a man's sex life will get him kicked out of
> office, but Bush's unprovoked war is considered acceptable.
>
Ok. What about someone who, on the very eve of his impending
impeachment, starts an unprovoked attack on the same country, or some poor
nation like, say for example ... Bosnia, where lots of men, women and
children are bombed for 90 days straight, killing some 2000 of them?
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129241 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 03:52 |
|
Never said Clinton was innocent. Problem is more people were outraged by the
affair then the attack.
"CaptainPike" <CaptainPike [at] ev1.net> wrote in message
news:11ic44gfsjeko5e [at] corp.supernews.com...
> "Brian Harrell" <sector221g [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:LsmdnR1ESdD2l7veRVn-hw [at] comcast.com...
>> I still can't understand why a man's sex life will get him kicked out of
>> office, but Bush's unprovoked war is considered acceptable.
>>
>
> Ok. What about someone who, on the very eve of his impending
> impeachment, starts an unprovoked attack on the same country, or some poor
> nation like, say for example ... Bosnia, where lots of men, women and
> children are bombed for 90 days straight, killing some 2000 of them?
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129242 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 04:17 |
|
Karl Johanson wrote:
> With Kirk having had confirmed sexuals relations with 2 women, one of
> whom was his wife; which recent president can we compare him to...
Thank You.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129244 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 04:23 |
|
Steven L. wrote:
> Karl Johanson wrote:
>
>> With Kirk having had confirmed sexuals relations with 2 women, one of
>> whom was his wife; which recent president can we compare him to...
>
>
> I can't compare Kirk's womanizing to any recent President.
That's correct.
> According to Ken Starr's report, Bush's predecessor (what was his name
> again?) had told Monica Lewinsky that he had enjoyed "hundreds" of love
> affairs, some of which started only months after he got married.
So?
> TOS would have had to run for at least 10 seasons for Kirk's womanizing
> to equal that track record.
Actually, it would have to have run for many decades. And that's
including all NON-Kirk love affairs, too.
Refer:
http://allyourtrekarebelongto.us/toswomen.htm
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129245 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 04:26 |
|
Brian Harrell wrote:
> I still can't understand why a man's sex life will get him kicked out of
> office, but Bush's unprovoked war is considered acceptable.
I agree. What is up with THAT?
Nobody's sex life got anyone kicked out of the USA Presidential office
(in our lifetime), FWIW.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129246 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 04:26 |
|
Steven L. wrote:
> Brian Harrell wrote:
>
>> I still can't understand why a man's sex life will get him kicked out
>> of office, but Bush's unprovoked war is considered acceptable.
>
>
> No American President has ever been removed from office. One resigned
> (Nixon).
Yes.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129247 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 04:28 |
|
Brian Harrell wrote:
> Sorry. I should have rephrased that. People had a problem with Clinton's sex
> life as if it was an all important issue.
"People" who had a politically motivated agenda made a big deal over
something (consensual sex between adults) that should have been a non-issue.
They got nowhere, FWIW.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129249 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 04:30 |
|
That's cute Laura :)
ToolPackinMama wrote:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/9eamf
>
> It's not to soon to look ahead. :)
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129250 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 04:33 |
|
ToolPackinMama wrote:
> Karl Johanson wrote:
>
>> With Kirk having had confirmed sexuals relations with 2 women, one of
>> whom was his wife
The other was in effect a rapist. Deela (Wink Of An Eye) kidnapped
Kirk, and finally coaxed him into bed with a threat of death - after he
already made it plain he wanted no part of her desperate plan. BTW, he
also made it plain that he was not in any way on her side, or to any
degree sympathetic... and for the tenderhearted and broadminded Kirk,
that's saying a lot!
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129251 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 04:35 |
|
Mike wrote:
> That's cute Laura :)
>
> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>
>>http://tinyurl.com/9eamf
>>
>>It's not to soon to look ahead. :)
Isn't it?
How much of a Trekkie am I? I actually have that bumpersticker! :D
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129252 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 04:56 |
|
"ToolPackinMama" <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote in message
news:11icea2m7cvkf3a [at] news.supernews.com...
> Brian Harrell wrote:
>
>> Sorry. I should have rephrased that. People had a problem with Clinton's
>> sex
>> life as if it was an all important issue.
>
> "People" who had a politically motivated agenda made a big deal over
> something (consensual sex between adults) that should have been a
> non-issue.
>
> They got nowhere, FWIW.
For the eight millionth time Clinton was not impeached because he got a
hummer from Monica. He was impeached because he lied under oath. If he had
said at the time he had sex with Monica, none of that would have been able
to proceed.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129254 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 05:07 |
|
RageForTheMachine wrote:
> "ToolPackinMama" <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote in message
> news:11icea2m7cvkf3a [at] news.supernews.com...
>
>>Brian Harrell wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Sorry. I should have rephrased that. People had a problem with Clinton's
>>>sex
>>>life as if it was an all important issue.
>>
>>"People" who had a politically motivated agenda made a big deal over
>>something (consensual sex between adults) that should have been a
>>non-issue.
>>
>>They got nowhere, FWIW.
>
>
> For the eight millionth time Clinton was not impeached because he got a
> hummer from Monica.
They failed to impeach him for something that any married man would have
lied about. No one died when Bill Clinton lied. Clinton oversaw eight
years of peace and prosperity. Non-issue.
Deaths in Iraq, deaths in New Orleans are ISSUES. I would prefer Bush
to be a sexual tramp than to be what he actually is: straight up!
Not being indiscreet about consensual extramarital sex? _Non-Issue_.
Especially since him and Hillary are still married. If she's not
outraged enough to dump him, then it's IMHO None Of Our Business.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129255 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 05:23 |
|
"ToolPackinMama" <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote in message
news:11icgj3ed7fepaf [at] news.supernews.com...
> RageForTheMachine wrote:
>> "ToolPackinMama" <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote in message
>> news:11icea2m7cvkf3a [at] news.supernews.com...
>>
>>>Brian Harrell wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>Sorry. I should have rephrased that. People had a problem with Clinton's
>>>>sex
>>>>life as if it was an all important issue.
>>>
>>>"People" who had a politically motivated agenda made a big deal over
>>>something (consensual sex between adults) that should have been a
>>>non-issue.
>>>
>>>They got nowhere, FWIW.
>>
>>
>> For the eight millionth time Clinton was not impeached because he got a
>> hummer from Monica.
>
> They failed to impeach him for something that any married man would have
> lied about. No one died when Bill Clinton lied. Clinton oversaw eight
> years of peace and prosperity. Non-issue.
>
> Deaths in Iraq, deaths in New Orleans are ISSUES. I would prefer Bush to
> be a sexual tramp than to be what he actually is: straight up!
>
> Not being indiscreet about consensual extramarital sex? _Non-Issue_.
> Especially since him and Hillary are still married. If she's not outraged
> enough to dump him, then it's IMHO None Of Our Business.
Exactly.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129256 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 06:14 |
|
LOL This is one Kirk/Spock I can get on board with!!!!!!
"ToolPackinMama" <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote in message
news:43237743.60606 [at] lauragoodwin.org...
> http://tinyurl.com/9eamf
>
> It's not to soon to look ahead. :)
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129257 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 06:21 |
|
"Brian Harrell" <sector221g [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
news:r5adnReXUJty0bneRVn-hA [at] comcast.com...
>
> <urbanasphalt [at] yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:1126425379.507212.78900 [at] g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> Worthless Bullshit. America has big friggin' problems and all you can
>> do is make jokes about it. You are a Wiccan degenerate psycopath.
>>
>
>
> Problem is alot of the current "big friggin' problems" are the fault of
> the current idiot in office. I think that bumper sticker maybe is just
> what we need.
But most of the country's problems are the fault of all the previous idiots
in any office.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129258 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 06:48 |
|
Brian, if you can't at least mention something remotely related to the topic
of
the newsgroup, you are welcome to post your drivel somewhere else.
"Brian Harrell" <sector221g [at] comcast.net> wrote in message
news:do6dnVleYbrIk7veRVn-uQ [at] comcast.com...
> Sorry. I should have rephrased that. People had a problem with Clinton's
> sex
> life as if it was an all important issue. Bush started an unprovoked war
> and
> a lot of good people were killed and that's accepted. I don't understand
> why
> people think sex is bad but war and violence are okay.
>
> "Steven L." <sdlitvin [at] earthlinkNOSPAM.net> wrote in message
> news:G%nVe.9232$4P5.5541 [at] newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> Brian Harrell wrote:
>>
>>> I still can't understand why a man's sex life will get him kicked out of
>>> office, but Bush's unprovoked war is considered acceptable.
>>
>> No American President has ever been removed from office. One resigned
>> (Nixon).
>>
>>
>> --
>> Steven D. Litvintchouk
>> Email: sdlitvin [at] earthlinkNOSPAM.net
>>
>> Remove the NOSPAM before replying to me.
>
>
>
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129259 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 08:12 |
|
Terry wrote:
> LOL This is one Kirk/Spock I can get on board with!!!!!!
Yea! Preach it! :)
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129260 ] |
Di, 13 September 2005 08:13 |
|
Terry wrote:
> Brian, if you can't at least mention something remotely related to the topic
> of
> the newsgroup, you are welcome to post your drivel somewhere else.
DITTO
|
|
|
