|
|
Science Fiction » alt.startrek » [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179993 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 03:11 |
|
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 00:24:50 GMT, "Forrrester"
<efor6920 [at] bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
><fishtacos [at] yum.net> wrote in message
>news:99fip1lmaagrkiavvtioh6gtgnsqqc2bdg [at] 4ax.com...
>>
>> You're a fucking asshole. Not my problem. Yours. And like the dunce
>> you are, you will die a coward's death behind your keyboard someday
>> bragging about how much better you are than anyone else in existence.
>> Back under your stone, coward.
>
>
>what a pathetic little fuckwit you are, why dont you go play in traffic, the
>rest of us could do with the laugh, unlike knight though i'd prefer you
>didn't bite me, the aroma of cock breath coming from your mouth is likely to
>cause a serious infection to the wound
>
>fozzi
Gee, who pulled puzzi's finger? He and 80_blight should get a room.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179994 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 03:13 |
|
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 00:27:41 GMT, "Forrrester"
<efor6920 [at] bigpond.net.au> wrote:
>
>"Anybody" <anybody [at] anywhere-anytime.com> wrote in message
>news:101220051313234775%anybody [at] anywhere-anytime.com...
>> In article <99fip1lmaagrkiavvtioh6gtgnsqqc2bdg [at] 4ax.com>,
>> fishtacos [at] yum.net wrote:
>>
>> > On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 02:32:45 -0500, "80 Knight"
>> > <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > >*yawn*. And you sound like an 'Anybody' sock-puppet. Either way, do not
>> > >presume to know me. Oh, and like I said before, bite me.
>> > >By the way......What is your problem again?
>> >
>> > You're a fucking asshole. Not my problem. Yours. And like the dunce
>> > you are, you will die a coward's death behind your keyboard someday
>> > bragging about how much better you are than anyone else in existence.
>> > Back under your stone, coward.
>>
>> Just killfile the moron. I did and no longer see his insane dribblings,
>> except when someone quotes them in a reply.
>
>i would killfile the moron in the group, but then i wouldn't see any of your
>posts
>
>cheers
>fozzi
Go tell your mommy to quit screwing the Great Dane and tuck you in
bed.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179995 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 03:47 |
|
<Snip>
>>>>>>>>Tell me about it. I and a couple others have already had it out with
>>>>>>>>'Anybody' about BSG in, oddly enough, a 'Knight Rider' (yup, the
>>>>>>>>show
>>>>>>>>with
>>>>>>>>the talking car :-P ) newsgroup, as that franchise is also thinking
>>>>>>>>about
>>>>>>>>making a big-screen movie, and 'Anybody' had to chirp in and tell us
>>>>>>>>how
>>>>>>>>much it would suck. As for the BSG argument, I and another person
>>>>>>>>asked
>>>>>>>>several questions as plain as day, yet Anybody refused to answer
>>>>>>>>them
>>>>>>>>based
>>>>>>>>on the fact that I was a 'troll' and the other guy was just stupid.
>>>>>>>>But,
>>>>>>>>can't win 'em all eh? I actually feel sorry for Anybody. He seems to
>>>>>>>>be
>>>>>>>>stuck in his own little world where everyone is against him and
>>>>>>>>'Hollyweird'
>>>>>>>>is out to get him. But, I, you, and many others have tried to reason
>>>>>>>>with
>>>>>>>>him, only to come to the conclusion that 'Anybody' is truly
>>>>>>>>'Nobody'.
>>>>>>>>Should
>>>>>>>>he decide to engage in further mature conversation, I myself would
>>>>>>>>be
>>>>>>>>happy
>>>>>>>>to do so as well, but I think he is stuck on 'playback' and will not
>>>>>>>>change.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> What a pompous self-important ass you are. In the real world, you'd
>>>>>>> be missing teeth for sure.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>In the real world, you would be too chicken shit to do it, so bite me.
>>>>>
>>>>> You're the sort who talks big and never shows for their transfusion.
>>>>
>>>>*yawn*. And you sound like an 'Anybody' sock-puppet. Either way, do not
>>>>presume to know me. Oh, and like I said before, bite me.
>>>>By the way......What is your problem again?
>>>
>>> You're a fucking asshole. Not my problem. Yours. And like the dunce
>>> you are, you will die a coward's death behind your keyboard someday
>>> bragging about how much better you are than anyone else in existence.
>>> Back under your stone, coward.
>>
>>Wow. I am in awe of you. To think that I am the asshole, and not you, the
>>one who came into a conversation knowing absolutely nothing about the
>>topic,
>>and started acting like a moron.
>>Though, for the record, I never said I was better then anyone else, just
>>that 'Anybody' runs from arguments when he knows he can not win them. As I
>>also said, you sound like a Sock-Puppet of his. If you have a problem with
>>me, tell me what it is and perhaps it can be resolved. If your only
>>problem
>>is my un-trust of 'Anybody' then that is between him and myself, and you
>>need to seek out a life.
>
> Only a guilty person like you has to protest too much. Besides, I
> told you to go hide back under your rock. You don't listen too well.
> If you had any balls or intelligence, you would take it to email
> between yourself and the person you are stalking and quit trying to
> make this newsgroup into your own private pity party. You loser.
Oh man you amuse me so very much. But, I was going to try a little more to
see what your problem is, but having read the other post's of yours in this
group, I see you are a complete utter Troll. Have a nice day.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179999 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 08:50 |
|
"Forrrester" <efor6920 [at] bigpond.net.au> wrote in message
news:1ipmf.15952$ea6.15787 [at] news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Anybody" <anybody [at] anywhere-anytime.com> wrote in message
> news:101220051313234775%anybody [at] anywhere-anytime.com...
> > In article <99fip1lmaagrkiavvtioh6gtgnsqqc2bdg [at] 4ax.com>,
> > fishtacos [at] yum.net wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 02:32:45 -0500, "80 Knight"
> > > <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > >*yawn*. And you sound like an 'Anybody' sock-puppet. Either way, do
not
> > > >presume to know me. Oh, and like I said before, bite me.
> > > >By the way......What is your problem again?
> > >
> > > You're a fucking asshole. Not my problem. Yours. And like the dunce
> > > you are, you will die a coward's death behind your keyboard someday
> > > bragging about how much better you are than anyone else in existence.
> > > Back under your stone, coward.
> >
> > Just killfile the moron. I did and no longer see his insane dribblings,
> > except when someone quotes them in a reply.
>
> i would killfile the moron in the group, but then i wouldn't see any of
your
> posts
>
> cheers
> fozzi
LOL! Hasta be a troll if "Anybody" suggests one killfile it....... heh
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #180000 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 08:52 |
|
"Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
news:_6qmf.136995$Ph4.4177572 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> >>>>>>>I doubt if Vulcans eat doughnuts. They would consider the hole
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> illogical.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >
> >>>>>>>> >>>> > Not all doughnuts have holes. Some are more like buns in
shape. In
> >
> > fact,
> >
> >>>>>>>> >>>> > it's sometimes hard to discern whether what one is eating
is a bun
> >
> > or a
> >
> >>>>>>>> >>>> > doughnut.
> >>>>>>>> >>>> >
> >>>>>>>> >>>> > Ian
> >>>>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> You're talking to a Canadian, here. We're the world experts on
> >>>>>> >>> doughnuts. If it doesn't have a hole, it's a bun, not a
doughnut.
> >>>
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Especially those bluenosers where it's actually a Nova Scotia law
that
> >
> > one
> >
> >>>> > MUST go to Tim Horton's at *least* 3 times a week. I beleive him.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Tim Horton, the patron saint of the doughnut. We worship at his
> >>> church daily.
> >
> >
> > LOL! No doubt.....
> > True story of when I last flew out of Halifax; after my boss and I went
> > through security he says,
> > "Wanna coffee? I'm buy'n"
> > "OK," say I. We look down the hallway and no word of a lie the is 20 or
so
> > people lined up for Tim Horton's, right in front of us is a Starbucks
with
> > no line so we went there, as we weren't from that coast we had no fear
of
> > being arrested.
> > --
>
> Starbucks. Yuck. You come-from-away types don't know your coffee.
> You can't roll up the rim at Starbucks.
Indeed. But then again IMO coffee is something one makes at home (or work)
and beer is what one goes "out" for......
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #180003 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 16:00 |
|
"Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
news:njjmf.136793$Ph4.4171697 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> >>>>>Reminds me, what did the Vulcan ambassador say at the Klingon
banquet?
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> "Gagh me with a spoon."
> >>>>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Well I thought it was funny. See, Vulcans don't eat with their
> >
> > fingers...
> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > That oughta make for some interesting pickup lines...I wonder if
Koss
> >
> > ever said to T'Pol "Want to come back to my place and watch me eat a
> > doughnut without picking it up?"
> >
> >>>
> >>> I doubt if Vulcans eat doughnuts. They would consider the hole
> >>> illogical.
> >
> >
> > Not all doughnuts have holes. Some are more like buns in shape. In fact,
> > it's sometimes hard to discern whether what one is eating is a bun or a
> > doughnut.
> >
> > Ian
>
> You're talking to a Canadian, here. We're the world experts on
> doughnuts. If it doesn't have a hole, it's a bun, not a doughnut.
Well lookie here, you Canucks can believe whatever perverse
confectionery-related dogmas that you like. Here in the fine British Isles
though, a jam doughnut is sort of bun-shaped, with the jam in the middle. We
had an empire, you know.
Ian
--
www.jaxtrawstudios.com
science fiction with shagging in it
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #180005 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 21:24 |
|
>>You're talking to a Canadian, here. We're the world experts on
>>> doughnuts. If it doesn't have a hole, it's a bun, not a doughnut.
>
>
> Well lookie here, you Canucks can believe whatever perverse
> confectionery-related dogmas that you like. Here in the fine British Isles
> though, a jam doughnut is sort of bun-shaped, with the jam in the middle. We
> had an empire, you know.
Empire, shmempire, that's a Burlington Bun.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #180006 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 21:44 |
|
"Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
news:EPGmf.137337$Ph4.4186407 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> >>You're talking to a Canadian, here. We're the world experts on
> >>> doughnuts. If it doesn't have a hole, it's a bun, not a doughnut.
> >
> >
> > Well lookie here, you Canucks can believe whatever perverse
> > confectionery-related dogmas that you like. Here in the fine British
Isles
> > though, a jam doughnut is sort of bun-shaped, with the jam in the
middle. We
> > had an empire, you know.
>
> Empire, shmempire, that's a Burlington Bun.
According to this site
http://www.oup.com/ca/genref/dictionaries/about/
A Burlington Bun *is* a name used by colonial guttersnipes for... a jam
doughnut.
Don't even get me started on "jelly". I may become so furious as to
spontaneously implode.
Ian
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #180008 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 22:00 |
|
"Jaxtraw" <jax [at] knickersjaxtrawstudios.com> wrote in message
news:439b3d23$0$23281$db0fefd9 [at] news.zen.co.uk...
> "Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
> news:EPGmf.137337$Ph4.4186407 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>> >>You're talking to a Canadian, here. We're the world experts on
>> >>> doughnuts. If it doesn't have a hole, it's a bun, not a doughnut.
>> >
>> >
>> > Well lookie here, you Canucks can believe whatever perverse
>> > confectionery-related dogmas that you like. Here in the fine British
> Isles
>> > though, a jam doughnut is sort of bun-shaped, with the jam in the
> middle. We
>> > had an empire, you know.
>>
>> Empire, shmempire, that's a Burlington Bun.
>
> According to this site
>
> http://www.oup.com/ca/genref/dictionaries/about/
>
> A Burlington Bun *is* a name used by colonial guttersnipes for... a jam
> doughnut.
>
> Don't even get me started on "jelly". I may become so furious as to
> spontaneously implode.
>
> Ian
Have you guys seen the TV commercial where all the snobby people
are sitting at the diner table asking for the preserves and then the
"down home" guy says in a quasi-southern American accent, "Can
ya please pass the jelly?" All the snobs roll their eyes and exhale in
their high faluting ways. It is kind of funny as it pokes fun at how
serious people can be about something so benign.
:-)
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #180009 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 22:04 |
|
>>>>You're talking to a Canadian, here. We're the world experts on
>>>>
>>>>>> >>> doughnuts. If it doesn't have a hole, it's a bun, not a doughnut.
>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Well lookie here, you Canucks can believe whatever perverse
>>>> > confectionery-related dogmas that you like. Here in the fine British
>
> Isles
>
>>>> > though, a jam doughnut is sort of bun-shaped, with the jam in the
>
> middle. We
>
>>>> > had an empire, you know.
>>
>>>
>>> Empire, shmempire, that's a Burlington Bun.
>
>
> According to this site
>
> http://www.oup.com/ca/genref/dictionaries/about/
>
> A Burlington Bun *is* a name used by colonial guttersnipes for... a jam
> doughnut.
>
> Don't even get me started on "jelly". I may become so furious as to
> spontaneously implode.
>
A doughnut without a hole is like a lifesaver without a hole. For
some reason it doesn't taste as good. And that reason is ...
surface area. Having a hole in the center exposes more surface
area, hence enhanced taste. A Burlington Bun is a very nice
confection, but it isn't a doughnut.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #180010 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 22:14 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #180011 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 22:59 |
|
"Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
news:8pHmf.137359$Ph4.4186481 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> >>>>You're talking to a Canadian, here. We're the world experts on
> >>>>
> >>>>>> >>> doughnuts. If it doesn't have a hole, it's a bun, not a
doughnut.
> >>>
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Well lookie here, you Canucks can believe whatever perverse
> >>>> > confectionery-related dogmas that you like. Here in the fine
British
> >
> > Isles
> >
> >>>> > though, a jam doughnut is sort of bun-shaped, with the jam in the
> >
> > middle. We
> >
> >>>> > had an empire, you know.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Empire, shmempire, that's a Burlington Bun.
> >
> >
> > According to this site
> >
> > http://www.oup.com/ca/genref/dictionaries/about/
> >
> > A Burlington Bun *is* a name used by colonial guttersnipes for... a jam
> > doughnut.
> >
> > Don't even get me started on "jelly". I may become so furious as to
> > spontaneously implode.
> >
>
> A doughnut without a hole is like a lifesaver without a hole. For
> some reason it doesn't taste as good. And that reason is ...
> surface area. Having a hole in the center exposes more surface
> area, hence enhanced taste. A Burlington Bun is a very nice
> confection, but it isn't a doughnut.
If this were a Bermaga script, we'd be talking about doughnuton particles by
now, and we'd have to reconfigure the main deflector to emit a doughnuton
pulse to make a hole in the Burlington Bun.
And then at the end, time would reset and the hole would have *never been
there at all*.
Ian
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #180013 ] |
So, 11 Dezember 2005 00:53 |
|
>>>A Burlington Bun *is* a name used by colonial guttersnipes for... a jam
>>>> > doughnut.
>>>> >
>>>> > Don't even get me started on "jelly". I may become so furious as to
>>>> > spontaneously implode.
>>>> >
>>
>>>
>>> A doughnut without a hole is like a lifesaver without a hole. For
>>> some reason it doesn't taste as good. And that reason is ...
>>> surface area. Having a hole in the center exposes more surface
>>> area, hence enhanced taste. A Burlington Bun is a very nice
>>> confection, but it isn't a doughnut.
>
>
> If this were a Bermaga script, we'd be talking about doughnuton particles by
> now, and we'd have to reconfigure the main deflector to emit a doughnuton
> pulse to make a hole in the Burlington Bun.
>
> And then at the end, time would reset and the hole would have *never been
> there at all*.
It all makes sense now, when you explain it in terms of doughnuts.
And the takions would be the sprinkles!
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #180016 ] |
So, 11 Dezember 2005 02:15 |
|
"Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
news:RTJmf.137455$Ph4.4190275 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> >>>A Burlington Bun *is* a name used by colonial guttersnipes for... a jam
> >>>> > doughnut.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Don't even get me started on "jelly". I may become so furious as to
> >>>> > spontaneously implode.
> >>>> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> A doughnut without a hole is like a lifesaver without a hole. For
> >>> some reason it doesn't taste as good. And that reason is ...
> >>> surface area. Having a hole in the center exposes more surface
> >>> area, hence enhanced taste. A Burlington Bun is a very nice
> >>> confection, but it isn't a doughnut.
> >
> >
> > If this were a Bermaga script, we'd be talking about doughnuton
particles by
> > now, and we'd have to reconfigure the main deflector to emit a
doughnuton
> > pulse to make a hole in the Burlington Bun.
> >
> > And then at the end, time would reset and the hole would have *never
been
> > there at all*.
>
> It all makes sense now, when you explain it in terms of doughnuts.
> And the takions would be the sprinkles!
Of course in Canada we don't cal them Danishes anymore, they're Freedom
Pastries....
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/2005/07/25/hansislan d050725.html
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #180018 ] |
So, 11 Dezember 2005 06:46 |
|
"Numan" <tbrdmann [at] sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:AlHmf.38346$D13.28155 [at] newssvr11.news.prodigy.com...
> Have you guys seen the TV commercial where all the snobby people
> are sitting at the diner table asking for the preserves and then the
> "down home" guy says in a quasi-southern American accent, "Can
> ya please pass the jelly?" All the snobs roll their eyes and exhale in
> their high faluting ways. It is kind of funny as it pokes fun at how
> serious people can be about something so benign.
:P
But seriously - unless you really get into it - there is a difference
between jelly, jam, preserve and etc. It seems not enough people know that
there truly is a difference.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #180020 ] |
So, 11 Dezember 2005 11:58 |
|
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:47:16 -0500, "80 Knight"
<80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
><Snip>
>
>>>>>>>>>Tell me about it. I and a couple others have already had it out with
>>>>>>>>>'Anybody' about BSG in, oddly enough, a 'Knight Rider' (yup, the
>>>>>>>>>show
>>>>>>>>>with
>>>>>>>>>the talking car :-P ) newsgroup, as that franchise is also thinking
>>>>>>>>>about
>>>>>>>>>making a big-screen movie, and 'Anybody' had to chirp in and tell us
>>>>>>>>>how
>>>>>>>>>much it would suck. As for the BSG argument, I and another person
>>>>>>>>>asked
>>>>>>>>>several questions as plain as day, yet Anybody refused to answer
>>>>>>>>>them
>>>>>>>>>based
>>>>>>>>>on the fact that I was a 'troll' and the other guy was just stupid.
>>>>>>>>>But,
>>>>>>>>>can't win 'em all eh? I actually feel sorry for Anybody. He seems to
>>>>>>>>>be
>>>>>>>>>stuck in his own little world where everyone is against him and
>>>>>>>>>'Hollyweird'
>>>>>>>>>is out to get him. But, I, you, and many others have tried to reason
>>>>>>>>>with
>>>>>>>>>him, only to come to the conclusion that 'Anybody' is truly
>>>>>>>>>'Nobody'.
>>>>>>>>>Should
>>>>>>>>>he decide to engage in further mature conversation, I myself would
>>>>>>>>>be
>>>>>>>>>happy
>>>>>>>>>to do so as well, but I think he is stuck on 'playback' and will not
>>>>>>>>>change.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> What a pompous self-important ass you are. In the real world, you'd
>>>>>>>> be missing teeth for sure.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>In the real world, you would be too chicken shit to do it, so bite me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're the sort who talks big and never shows for their transfusion.
>>>>>
>>>>>*yawn*. And you sound like an 'Anybody' sock-puppet. Either way, do not
>>>>>presume to know me. Oh, and like I said before, bite me.
>>>>>By the way......What is your problem again?
>>>>
>>>> You're a fucking asshole. Not my problem. Yours. And like the dunce
>>>> you are, you will die a coward's death behind your keyboard someday
>>>> bragging about how much better you are than anyone else in existence.
>>>> Back under your stone, coward.
>>>
>>>Wow. I am in awe of you. To think that I am the asshole, and not you, the
>>>one who came into a conversation knowing absolutely nothing about the
>>>topic,
>>>and started acting like a moron.
>>>Though, for the record, I never said I was better then anyone else, just
>>>that 'Anybody' runs from arguments when he knows he can not win them. As I
>>>also said, you sound like a Sock-Puppet of his. If you have a problem with
>>>me, tell me what it is and perhaps it can be resolved. If your only
>>>problem
>>>is my un-trust of 'Anybody' then that is between him and myself, and you
>>>need to seek out a life.
>>
>> Only a guilty person like you has to protest too much. Besides, I
>> told you to go hide back under your rock. You don't listen too well.
>> If you had any balls or intelligence, you would take it to email
>> between yourself and the person you are stalking and quit trying to
>> make this newsgroup into your own private pity party. You loser.
>
>Oh man you amuse me so very much. But, I was going to try a little more to
>see what your problem is, but having read the other post's of yours in this
>group, I see you are a complete utter Troll. Have a nice day.
Jackass, I'd tell you to go to hell but you already live there in a
mental prison. I pity you.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #180034 ] |
So, 11 Dezember 2005 18:56 |
|
<fap [at] london.net> wrote in message
news:6i1op19d2ng5b3p52nkr4r2j3h48aqk79v [at] 4ax.com...
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 21:47:16 -0500, "80 Knight"
--
Whatta sad pathetic life you must have to constantly troll newsgroups having
to constantly change you nic because so many people have killfiled you. I
and everyone else are laughing at you. No real life friends and no friends
on Usenet. Seriously take yourself out of the gene pool, we could do with
another laugh.
--
Qa ' PLONK
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
|
|
|
| Re: - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #180041 ] |
Mo, 12 Dezember 2005 04:24 |
|
Bring back Archer!
"OSI" <abuse [at] msn.com> wrote in message
news:_I2lf.11625$6e.9634 [at] tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> spiritofsupergirl [at] hotmail.com wrote:
>
>>>Bring back Kirk!
>>
>> This isn't comic books. Star Trek has at least some credibility.
>
> Um... Have you /seen/ Search for Spock?! :-/
>
>
> --
> OSI
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #301036 ] |
Do, 20 Juli 2006 21:59 |
|
But James Doohan and Deforest Kelly have passed on. What exactly would he
cover?
--
Josh
http://www.pingeek.com
Get your pinball show dvds here:
http://www.thepinballshow.com
"Stan Jensen" <spam [at] wonderful.spam> wrote in message
news:jfk7p19lrij3fv21e9cikasqi7s7c1hgn8 [at] 4ax.com...
> Now, I'm just passing this along. DOn't anyone get their hopes up.
> Paramount is still not loking to do anything with Trek in the
> foreseeable future...
>
> Singer Considers Trek Movie
>
> Bryan Singer, an avowed Star Trek fan, told SCI FI Wire that he's
> thought about directing a Trek movie. "I'm a huge fan," Singer said in
> an interview at the Nov. 30 premiere of the SCI FI Channel's upcoming
> original miniseries The Triangle, which he executive-produced with
> Dean Devlin.
>
> Singer added: "We're huge Trekkies. And we've always talked about what
> we would do, and what would I do, if I were to make a film in that
> universe."
>
> It's unclear when or if Paramount will mount another Trek film, since
> its last effort, Star Trek: Nemesis, did poorly at the box office and
> the last Trek series, Star Trek: Enterprise, was canceled after
> drawing low ratings.
>
> Singer has kept a strong link with the Trek universe. He made a cameo
> appearance in Nemesis. He also worked on the last two X-Men films with
> The Next Generation's Patrick Stewart (Jean-Luc Picard). Singer is
> currently finishing Superman Returns and is working on his next
> project, an update of the SF movie Logan's Run.
>
> "Again, you know, it's the same thing: X-Men, Superman, Logan's Run,
> all these things: There are these incredible universes, really,"
> Singer said, adding: "You kind of wish you could play in them all. I
> mean, I got to do a cameo in the last Star Trek film; that was a
> thrill. I got to be on the Enterprise when it was under attack."
>
> As for what he would do in his version of a Star Trek movie? "[That's]
> a longer story," he said. "It would involve ... it would be big. It
> would be very big."
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: So Feb 5 17:01:33 CET 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,20010 Sekunden |
