|
|
Science Fiction » alt.startrek » [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179888 ] |
Di, 06 Dezember 2005 19:00 |
|
"whodunit" <pillut_48 [at] sbcworldly.net> wrote in message
news:kujlf.32281$Zv5.20823 [at] newssvr25.news.prodigy.net...
> Anybody wrote:
> > In article <wqedne67J4NRvQjeRVn-hg [at] comcast.com>, ToolPackinMama
> > <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Anybody wrote:
> >>
> >>>In article <YLudneV5YKiEngjeRVn-qA [at] comcast.com>, ToolPackinMama
> >>><laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Anybody wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>In article <AIGdnYII1ZVUfwnenZ2dnUVZ_sOdnZ2d [at] comcast.com>,
> >>>>>ToolPackinMama <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Al Smith wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>Know what Paramount should do? They should comission a series of
ten
> >>>>>>>limited budget Trek films by different well known directors, and
run
> >>>>>>>them as a miniseries on television. Just let the directors do
whatever
> >>>>>>>stories they wanted to do. They could put the Trek special effects
team
> >>>>>>>at the disposal of the different directors as their films came up,
so
> >>>>>>>all the films would have a nice, uniform look and feel. It would be
> >>>>>>>fascinating to see what fresh minds would do with the Trek
universe.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>That's actually a very cool idea! :)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>It's actually stolen from the novels
> >>>>
> >>>>What a weird thing to say. I can't imagine what you mean.
> >>>
> >>>It called "Strange New Worlds" and has been run for a few years now.
> >>
> >>The very idea of an anthology is not new, dude.
> >
> >
> > Good grief! :-\
> >
> > Not the "anthology" part - the part about getting different people to
> > write their own Star Trek stories.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/9zfpz
> http://tinyurl.com/7mflk
> http://tinyurl.com/dqtkt
>
> from dictionary.com:
> an·thol·o·gy Audio pronunciation of "anthology" ( P ) Pronunciation
> Key (n-thl-j)
> n. pl. an·thol·o·gies
>
> 1. A collection of literary pieces, such as poems, short stories, or
> plays.
> 2. A miscellany, assortment, or catalog, as of complaints, comments,
> or ideas: “The Irish love their constitution for what it is: an
> anthology of the clerical-nationalist ideas of 1936” (Economist).
LOL!
Let then bicker, it out to be good. TPM uses her own personal dictionary
where words mean something different than they do for the rest of us and it
looks as though "Anybody" does too.
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179892 ] |
Di, 06 Dezember 2005 20:13 |
|
"Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
news:Ue3lf.134751$Ph4.4118727 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>
> Know what Paramount should do? They should comission a series of ten
> limited budget Trek films by different well known directors, and run them
> as a miniseries on television. Just let the directors do whatever stories
> they wanted to do. They could put the Trek special effects team at the
> disposal of the different directors as their films came up, so all the
> films would have a nice, uniform look and feel. It would be fascinating to
> see what fresh minds would do with the Trek universe.
I like that idea.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179893 ] |
Di, 06 Dezember 2005 20:21 |
|
"80 Knight" <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote in message
news:YcmdnSWopKc5swjeRVn-og [at] rogers.com...
> "Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
> news:Ue3lf.134751$Ph4.4118727 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>
> <Snip>
>
>> Know what Paramount should do? They should comission a series of ten
>> limited budget Trek films by different well known directors, and run them
>> as a miniseries on television. Just let the directors do whatever stories
>> they wanted to do. They could put the Trek special effects team at the
>> disposal of the different directors as their films came up, so all the
>> films would have a nice, uniform look and feel. It would be fascinating
>> to see what fresh minds would do with the Trek universe.
>
> I honestly think that is a great idea. After the ten or so movies have
> been made and shown on TV, Paramount can have a huge vote by the fans as
> to which movie to turn into a new series. Who knows, maybe we could find
> another awesome Trek.
That would work for me.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179909 ] |
Mi, 07 Dezember 2005 07:36 |
|
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 17:57:46 GMT, OSI <abuse [at] msn.com> wrote:
>Stan Jensen wrote:
>
>> As for what he would do in his version of a Star Trek movie? "[That's]
>> a longer story," he said. "It would involve ... it would be big. It
>> would be very big."
>
>Bring back Kirk!
You mean wheel back Kirk.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179926 ] |
Mi, 07 Dezember 2005 22:51 |
|
>>>As for what he would do in his version of a Star Trek movie? "[That's]
>>>>> a longer story," he said. "It would involve ... it would be big. It
>>>>> would be very big."
>>
>>>
>>>Bring back Kirk!
>
>
> You mean wheel back Kirk.
Sulu: "We'll bring Kirk back in a floatation tank full of water."
Chekov: "But ... how will we carry that much water without
flooding the ship?"
Sulu: "Transparent aluminum. We'll build walls of six-inch
transparent aluminum. It worked for the whales."
Scotty: "Aye, laddie, it might work. But I dunna think six-inch
walls will be thick enough. What if he thrashes around in the
tank? It'll never take the strain!"
Sulu: "You're right, Mr. Scott. We'll use eight-inch thick walls."
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179927 ] |
Mi, 07 Dezember 2005 23:27 |
|
"Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:_Kclf.50670$ki.13211 [at] pd7tw2no...
> "80 Knight" <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:O-adndqE8PAnyQjenZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d [at] rogers.com...
>> "Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
>> news:P%blf.50609$ki.17958 [at] pd7tw2no...
>> > "80 Knight" <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote in message
>> > news:_fOdnegbmbefswjeRVn-uQ [at] rogers.com...
<Snip>
>>
>> >> >> > > They are legally prevented from doing so, AFAIK they could get
>> >> >> > > sued
>> >> >> > > if
>> >> >> > > they do that.
>> >> >> > > Which is why none of the authors ever frequent these NGs.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > But that is absurd! You can't patent/copyright a "concept"!
>> >> >>
>> >> >> That depends on how detailed you make it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You obvious can't patent "device to breath underwater", but you can
>> >> >> patent / copyright "device to breath underwater utilising sponges
> and
>> >> >> grape jelly". Anyone who then makes a product using sponges and
> grape
>> >> >> jelly for breathing underwater could be in trouble.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Apple Computer (among others) patents concepts galore, many of
>> >> >> which
>> >> >> it
>> >> >> never uses or has any intention of using.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> If you were to described a detailed storyline that then later
>> >> >> turned
>> >> >> on
>> >> >> on TV identically or "close enough", then the person claiming it as
>> >> >> there own would be in serious trouble (assuming you can prove you
> came
>> >> >> up with it first).
>> >> >
>> >> > There you have it, the definitive answer form "Anybody" (he's so
>> > s-m-r-t)
>> >>
>> >> You know, I never had a problem with him until he started calling me
> and
>> >> others (on a different group) trolls, just because we did not agree
> with
>> >> him. Now, I look at what he writes and feel bad for him. He obviously
> has
>> >> nothing to do other then bitch and moan about anything and everything.
>> >
>> > Indeed... and apparently he knows how to produce and write (and
>> > probably
>> > cast and act in) TV shows too. Just ask him.
>>
>> Of course he does. Yet, I have not seen him offer one good idea on how to
>> improve Trek, or anything else he bitches about. Not that I read all of
> his
>> rants, just the ones I stumble across.
>
> Heh heh, indeed.
> And according to "Anybody" the only way to improve Trek is the deaths of
> Berman and Braga 'cause they're to blame for *everything.* Oh and stop
> "Hollyweird" recycling ideas (and making them better) like the re-imaging
> of
> Battlestar Galactica. (IMO the best and most enjoyable Sci-fi series since
> B5, oh ya and season 4 of Ent)
Tell me about it. I and a couple others have already had it out with
'Anybody' about BSG in, oddly enough, a 'Knight Rider' (yup, the show with
the talking car :-P ) newsgroup, as that franchise is also thinking about
making a big-screen movie, and 'Anybody' had to chirp in and tell us how
much it would suck. As for the BSG argument, I and another person asked
several questions as plain as day, yet Anybody refused to answer them based
on the fact that I was a 'troll' and the other guy was just stupid. But,
can't win 'em all eh? I actually feel sorry for Anybody. He seems to be
stuck in his own little world where everyone is against him and 'Hollyweird'
is out to get him. But, I, you, and many others have tried to reason with
him, only to come to the conclusion that 'Anybody' is truly 'Nobody'. Should
he decide to engage in further mature conversation, I myself would be happy
to do so as well, but I think he is stuck on 'playback' and will not change.
|
|
|
| Re: Trekkie, the term Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179931 ] |
Do, 08 Dezember 2005 04:02 |
|
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 19:58:07 -0500, ToolPackinMama
<laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
>Stan Jensen wrote:
>
>> Bryan Singer, an avowed Star Trek fan, told SCI FI Wire that he's
>> thought about directing a Trek movie. "I'm a huge fan," Singer said in
>> an interview at the Nov. 30 premiere of the SCI FI Channel's upcoming
>> original miniseries The Triangle, which he executive-produced with
>> Dean Devlin.
>>
>> Singer added: "We're huge Trekkies. And we've always talked about what
>> we would do, and what would I do, if I were to make a film in that
>> universe."
>
>NOTE: He calls himself a TREKKIE, ~not a "Trekker".
Which means what, precisely? That he chose one word over the other?
Personal preferences do not a hard and fast rule make...
-LMB
|
|
|
| Re: Trekkie, the term Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179933 ] |
Do, 08 Dezember 2005 04:18 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179934 ] |
Do, 08 Dezember 2005 04:29 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179939 ] |
Do, 08 Dezember 2005 07:25 |
|
In article <lPIlf.135766$Ph4.4147629 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca>, Al Smith <invalid [at] address.com> wrote:
>>>>As for what he would do in his version of a Star Trek movie? "[That's]
>>>>>> a longer story," he said. "It would involve ... it would be big. It
>>>>>> would be very big."
>>>
>>>>
>>>>Bring back Kirk!
>>
>>
>> You mean wheel back Kirk.
>
>Sulu: "We'll bring Kirk back in a floatation tank full of water."
>
>Chekov: "But ... how will we carry that much water without
>flooding the ship?"
>
>Sulu: "Transparent aluminum. We'll build walls of six-inch
>transparent aluminum. It worked for the whales."
>
>Scotty: "Aye, laddie, it might work. But I dunna think six-inch
>walls will be thick enough. What if he thrashes around in the
>tank? It'll never take the strain!"
>
>Sulu: "You're right, Mr. Scott. We'll use eight-inch thick walls."
Captain, "There be whales here!"
|
|
|
| Re: - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179940 ] |
Do, 08 Dezember 2005 07:44 |
|
> Here's my wishlist of directors
>
> David Lynch
But no midgets!
> David Cronenberg
In his early scary style, not his later WTF style.
> The Wachowski Brothers
Phaser time!
> Quentin Tarentino
"Borg to the left of me, Klingons to the right,
"Here I am,
"Stuck in the force field with you.
> JJ Abrams
Huh?
> Doug Liman
Que?
> Ridley Scott
"She'll be an android, but she'll live forever!"
> John Woo
Spock: "Captain, why are you wearing that long leather coat?"
Kirk: "Shut up Spock, it making a statement."
> George Romero (for any Borg stories)
"Set phasers to kill, and just shoot 'em in the head."
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179941 ] |
Do, 08 Dezember 2005 08:23 |
|
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:27:22 -0500, "80 Knight"
<80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>"Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
>news:_Kclf.50670$ki.13211 [at] pd7tw2no...
>> "80 Knight" <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote in message
>> news:O-adndqE8PAnyQjenZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d [at] rogers.com...
>>> "Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
>>> news:P%blf.50609$ki.17958 [at] pd7tw2no...
>>> > "80 Knight" <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote in message
>>> > news:_fOdnegbmbefswjeRVn-uQ [at] rogers.com...
>
><Snip>
>
>>>
>>> >> >> > > They are legally prevented from doing so, AFAIK they could get
>>> >> >> > > sued
>>> >> >> > > if
>>> >> >> > > they do that.
>>> >> >> > > Which is why none of the authors ever frequent these NGs.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > But that is absurd! You can't patent/copyright a "concept"!
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> That depends on how detailed you make it.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> You obvious can't patent "device to breath underwater", but you can
>>> >> >> patent / copyright "device to breath underwater utilising sponges
>> and
>>> >> >> grape jelly". Anyone who then makes a product using sponges and
>> grape
>>> >> >> jelly for breathing underwater could be in trouble.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> Apple Computer (among others) patents concepts galore, many of
>>> >> >> which
>>> >> >> it
>>> >> >> never uses or has any intention of using.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> If you were to described a detailed storyline that then later
>>> >> >> turned
>>> >> >> on
>>> >> >> on TV identically or "close enough", then the person claiming it as
>>> >> >> there own would be in serious trouble (assuming you can prove you
>> came
>>> >> >> up with it first).
>>> >> >
>>> >> > There you have it, the definitive answer form "Anybody" (he's so
>>> > s-m-r-t)
>>> >>
>>> >> You know, I never had a problem with him until he started calling me
>> and
>>> >> others (on a different group) trolls, just because we did not agree
>> with
>>> >> him. Now, I look at what he writes and feel bad for him. He obviously
>> has
>>> >> nothing to do other then bitch and moan about anything and everything.
>>> >
>>> > Indeed... and apparently he knows how to produce and write (and
>>> > probably
>>> > cast and act in) TV shows too. Just ask him.
>>>
>>> Of course he does. Yet, I have not seen him offer one good idea on how to
>>> improve Trek, or anything else he bitches about. Not that I read all of
>> his
>>> rants, just the ones I stumble across.
>>
>> Heh heh, indeed.
>> And according to "Anybody" the only way to improve Trek is the deaths of
>> Berman and Braga 'cause they're to blame for *everything.* Oh and stop
>> "Hollyweird" recycling ideas (and making them better) like the re-imaging
>> of
>> Battlestar Galactica. (IMO the best and most enjoyable Sci-fi series since
>> B5, oh ya and season 4 of Ent)
>
>Tell me about it. I and a couple others have already had it out with
>'Anybody' about BSG in, oddly enough, a 'Knight Rider' (yup, the show with
>the talking car :-P ) newsgroup, as that franchise is also thinking about
>making a big-screen movie, and 'Anybody' had to chirp in and tell us how
>much it would suck. As for the BSG argument, I and another person asked
>several questions as plain as day, yet Anybody refused to answer them based
>on the fact that I was a 'troll' and the other guy was just stupid. But,
>can't win 'em all eh? I actually feel sorry for Anybody. He seems to be
>stuck in his own little world where everyone is against him and 'Hollyweird'
>is out to get him. But, I, you, and many others have tried to reason with
>him, only to come to the conclusion that 'Anybody' is truly 'Nobody'. Should
>he decide to engage in further mature conversation, I myself would be happy
>to do so as well, but I think he is stuck on 'playback' and will not change.
>
What a pompous self-important ass you are. In the real world, you'd
be missing teeth for sure.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179950 ] |
Do, 08 Dezember 2005 15:45 |
|
<fishtacos [at] yum.net> wrote in message
news:tonfp11hcsb7jjoartcidvokcmg7n2jg6f [at] 4ax.com...
> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:27:22 -0500, "80 Knight"
> <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>
>>"Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
>>news:_Kclf.50670$ki.13211 [at] pd7tw2no...
>>> "80 Knight" <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote in message
>>> news:O-adndqE8PAnyQjenZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d [at] rogers.com...
>>>> "Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
>>>> news:P%blf.50609$ki.17958 [at] pd7tw2no...
>>>> > "80 Knight" <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote in message
>>>> > news:_fOdnegbmbefswjeRVn-uQ [at] rogers.com...
>>
>><Snip>
>>
>>>>
>>>> >> >> > > They are legally prevented from doing so, AFAIK they could
>>>> >> >> > > get
>>>> >> >> > > sued
>>>> >> >> > > if
>>>> >> >> > > they do that.
>>>> >> >> > > Which is why none of the authors ever frequent these NGs.
>>>> >> >> >
>>>> >> >> > But that is absurd! You can't patent/copyright a "concept"!
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> That depends on how detailed you make it.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> You obvious can't patent "device to breath underwater", but you
>>>> >> >> can
>>>> >> >> patent / copyright "device to breath underwater utilising sponges
>>> and
>>>> >> >> grape jelly". Anyone who then makes a product using sponges and
>>> grape
>>>> >> >> jelly for breathing underwater could be in trouble.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> Apple Computer (among others) patents concepts galore, many of
>>>> >> >> which
>>>> >> >> it
>>>> >> >> never uses or has any intention of using.
>>>> >> >>
>>>> >> >> If you were to described a detailed storyline that then later
>>>> >> >> turned
>>>> >> >> on
>>>> >> >> on TV identically or "close enough", then the person claiming it
>>>> >> >> as
>>>> >> >> there own would be in serious trouble (assuming you can prove you
>>> came
>>>> >> >> up with it first).
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > There you have it, the definitive answer form "Anybody" (he's so
>>>> > s-m-r-t)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> You know, I never had a problem with him until he started calling me
>>> and
>>>> >> others (on a different group) trolls, just because we did not agree
>>> with
>>>> >> him. Now, I look at what he writes and feel bad for him. He
>>>> >> obviously
>>> has
>>>> >> nothing to do other then bitch and moan about anything and
>>>> >> everything.
>>>> >
>>>> > Indeed... and apparently he knows how to produce and write (and
>>>> > probably
>>>> > cast and act in) TV shows too. Just ask him.
>>>>
>>>> Of course he does. Yet, I have not seen him offer one good idea on how
>>>> to
>>>> improve Trek, or anything else he bitches about. Not that I read all of
>>> his
>>>> rants, just the ones I stumble across.
>>>
>>> Heh heh, indeed.
>>> And according to "Anybody" the only way to improve Trek is the deaths of
>>> Berman and Braga 'cause they're to blame for *everything.* Oh and stop
>>> "Hollyweird" recycling ideas (and making them better) like the
>>> re-imaging
>>> of
>>> Battlestar Galactica. (IMO the best and most enjoyable Sci-fi series
>>> since
>>> B5, oh ya and season 4 of Ent)
>>
>>Tell me about it. I and a couple others have already had it out with
>>'Anybody' about BSG in, oddly enough, a 'Knight Rider' (yup, the show with
>>the talking car :-P ) newsgroup, as that franchise is also thinking about
>>making a big-screen movie, and 'Anybody' had to chirp in and tell us how
>>much it would suck. As for the BSG argument, I and another person asked
>>several questions as plain as day, yet Anybody refused to answer them
>>based
>>on the fact that I was a 'troll' and the other guy was just stupid. But,
>>can't win 'em all eh? I actually feel sorry for Anybody. He seems to be
>>stuck in his own little world where everyone is against him and
>>'Hollyweird'
>>is out to get him. But, I, you, and many others have tried to reason with
>>him, only to come to the conclusion that 'Anybody' is truly 'Nobody'.
>>Should
>>he decide to engage in further mature conversation, I myself would be
>>happy
>>to do so as well, but I think he is stuck on 'playback' and will not
>>change.
>>
>
> What a pompous self-important ass you are. In the real world, you'd
> be missing teeth for sure.
In the real world, you would be too chicken shit to do it, so bite me.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179954 ] |
Do, 08 Dezember 2005 18:08 |
|
>>>>>Bring back Kirk!
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> You mean wheel back Kirk.
>>
>>>
>>>Sulu: "We'll bring Kirk back in a floatation tank full of water."
>>>
>>>Chekov: "But ... how will we carry that much water without
>>>flooding the ship?"
>>>
>>>Sulu: "Transparent aluminum. We'll build walls of six-inch
>>>transparent aluminum. It worked for the whales."
>>>
>>>Scotty: "Aye, laddie, it might work. But I dunna think six-inch
>>>walls will be thick enough. What if he thrashes around in the
>>>tank? It'll never take the strain!"
>>>
>>>Sulu: "You're right, Mr. Scott. We'll use eight-inch thick walls."
>
> Captain, "There be whales here!"
I wonder if Shatner makes those whale noises when he swims under
water?
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179955 ] |
Do, 08 Dezember 2005 18:31 |
|
<fishtacos [at] yum.net> wrote in message
news:tonfp11hcsb7jjoartcidvokcmg7n2jg6f [at] 4ax.com...
> What a pompous self-important ass you are. In the real world, you'd
> be missing teeth for sure.
Whatta lame-ass troll you are. In the real world, you have no friends for
sure.
--
Qa ' PLONK
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179960 ] |
Do, 08 Dezember 2005 22:22 |
|
"80 Knight" <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote in message
news:59OdnTlqo8pV_AreRVn-oA [at] rogers.com...
> "Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:_Kclf.50670$ki.13211 [at] pd7tw2no...
> I actually feel sorry for Anybody. He seems to be stuck in his own
> little world where everyone is against him and 'Hollyweird' is out
> to get him.
Yeah, we all know that it's the Canadians that are out to get us!
So freaking runs from the Klingon from the great white north.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179962 ] |
Do, 08 Dezember 2005 23:22 |
|
"Night Spirit" <hipdale2 [at] earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Lu1mf.1026$nm.947 [at] newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> "80 Knight" <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:59OdnTlqo8pV_AreRVn-oA [at] rogers.com...
> > "Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
> > news:_Kclf.50670$ki.13211 [at] pd7tw2no...
> > I actually feel sorry for Anybody. He seems to be stuck in his own
> > little world where everyone is against him and 'Hollyweird' is out
> > to get him.
>
> Yeah, we all know that it's the Canadians that are out to get us!
Ssshhhuduupppp!
> So freaking runs from the Klingon from the great white north.
as well you should....
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #179963 ] |
Do, 08 Dezember 2005 23:27 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #179965 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 00:08 |
|
"Keeper of the Purple Twilight" <no [at] spam.invalid> wrote in message
news:2005120816271816807-no [at] spaminvalid...
> On 2005-12-08 16:22:58 -0600, "Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> said:
> >
> >
> >> So freaking runs from the Klingon from the great white north.
> >
> > as well you should....
>
> The Klingon from Canada? Isn't that, like, Red Green?
>
> "Keep your bat'leth on the ice!"
> "I'm a warrior, but I can change, if I have to, I guess."
> "If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you
> with gagh."
Mmmmm..... could be... here's us and "Harold"
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath/images/Bloodoath-images/ YoAdrian/PatMcKennacrew.JPG
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #179966 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 00:29 |
|
> The Klingon from Canada? Isn't that, like, Red Green?
>
> "Keep your bat'leth on the ice!"
> "I'm a warrior, but I can change, if I have to, I guess."
> "If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you with gagh."
Reminds me, what did the Vulcan ambassador say at the Klingon banquet?
"Gagh me with a spoon."
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #179967 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 00:30 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #179968 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 00:47 |
|
>> The Klingon from Canada? Isn't that, like, Red Green?
>>
>> "Keep your bat'leth on the ice!"
>> "I'm a warrior, but I can change, if I have to, I guess."
>> "If the women don't find you handsome, they should at least find you with gagh."
>
>
> Reminds me, what did the Vulcan ambassador say at the Klingon banquet?
>
> "Gagh me with a spoon."
Well I thought it was funny. See, Vulcans don't eat with their
fingers...
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #179972 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 02:19 |
|
|
Post removed (X-No-Archive: yes)
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #179973 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 07:58 |
|
>>> Reminds me, what did the Vulcan ambassador say at the Klingon banquet?
>>>
>>> "Gagh me with a spoon."
>>
>>
>> Well I thought it was funny. See, Vulcans don't eat with their fingers...
>
>
> That oughta make for some interesting pickup lines...I wonder if Koss ever said to T'Pol "Want to come back to my place and watch me eat a doughnut without picking it up?"
I doubt if Vulcans eat doughnuts. They would consider the hole
illogical.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179975 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 08:22 |
|
On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:45:38 -0500, "80 Knight"
<80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
><fishtacos [at] yum.net> wrote in message
>news:tonfp11hcsb7jjoartcidvokcmg7n2jg6f [at] 4ax.com...
>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:27:22 -0500, "80 Knight"
>> <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>>
>>>"Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
>>>news:_Kclf.50670$ki.13211 [at] pd7tw2no...
>>>> "80 Knight" <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:O-adndqE8PAnyQjenZ2dnUVZ_tWdnZ2d [at] rogers.com...
>>>>> "Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
>>>>> news:P%blf.50609$ki.17958 [at] pd7tw2no...
>>>>> > "80 Knight" <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote in message
>>>>> > news:_fOdnegbmbefswjeRVn-uQ [at] rogers.com...
>>>
>>><Snip>
>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> >> >> > > They are legally prevented from doing so, AFAIK they could
>>>>> >> >> > > get
>>>>> >> >> > > sued
>>>>> >> >> > > if
>>>>> >> >> > > they do that.
>>>>> >> >> > > Which is why none of the authors ever frequent these NGs.
>>>>> >> >> >
>>>>> >> >> > But that is absurd! You can't patent/copyright a "concept"!
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> That depends on how detailed you make it.
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> You obvious can't patent "device to breath underwater", but you
>>>>> >> >> can
>>>>> >> >> patent / copyright "device to breath underwater utilising sponges
>>>> and
>>>>> >> >> grape jelly". Anyone who then makes a product using sponges and
>>>> grape
>>>>> >> >> jelly for breathing underwater could be in trouble.
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> Apple Computer (among others) patents concepts galore, many of
>>>>> >> >> which
>>>>> >> >> it
>>>>> >> >> never uses or has any intention of using.
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> If you were to described a detailed storyline that then later
>>>>> >> >> turned
>>>>> >> >> on
>>>>> >> >> on TV identically or "close enough", then the person claiming it
>>>>> >> >> as
>>>>> >> >> there own would be in serious trouble (assuming you can prove you
>>>> came
>>>>> >> >> up with it first).
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > There you have it, the definitive answer form "Anybody" (he's so
>>>>> > s-m-r-t)
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> You know, I never had a problem with him until he started calling me
>>>> and
>>>>> >> others (on a different group) trolls, just because we did not agree
>>>> with
>>>>> >> him. Now, I look at what he writes and feel bad for him. He
>>>>> >> obviously
>>>> has
>>>>> >> nothing to do other then bitch and moan about anything and
>>>>> >> everything.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Indeed... and apparently he knows how to produce and write (and
>>>>> > probably
>>>>> > cast and act in) TV shows too. Just ask him.
>>>>>
>>>>> Of course he does. Yet, I have not seen him offer one good idea on how
>>>>> to
>>>>> improve Trek, or anything else he bitches about. Not that I read all of
>>>> his
>>>>> rants, just the ones I stumble across.
>>>>
>>>> Heh heh, indeed.
>>>> And according to "Anybody" the only way to improve Trek is the deaths of
>>>> Berman and Braga 'cause they're to blame for *everything.* Oh and stop
>>>> "Hollyweird" recycling ideas (and making them better) like the
>>>> re-imaging
>>>> of
>>>> Battlestar Galactica. (IMO the best and most enjoyable Sci-fi series
>>>> since
>>>> B5, oh ya and season 4 of Ent)
>>>
>>>Tell me about it. I and a couple others have already had it out with
>>>'Anybody' about BSG in, oddly enough, a 'Knight Rider' (yup, the show with
>>>the talking car :-P ) newsgroup, as that franchise is also thinking about
>>>making a big-screen movie, and 'Anybody' had to chirp in and tell us how
>>>much it would suck. As for the BSG argument, I and another person asked
>>>several questions as plain as day, yet Anybody refused to answer them
>>>based
>>>on the fact that I was a 'troll' and the other guy was just stupid. But,
>>>can't win 'em all eh? I actually feel sorry for Anybody. He seems to be
>>>stuck in his own little world where everyone is against him and
>>>'Hollyweird'
>>>is out to get him. But, I, you, and many others have tried to reason with
>>>him, only to come to the conclusion that 'Anybody' is truly 'Nobody'.
>>>Should
>>>he decide to engage in further mature conversation, I myself would be
>>>happy
>>>to do so as well, but I think he is stuck on 'playback' and will not
>>>change.
>>>
>>
>> What a pompous self-important ass you are. In the real world, you'd
>> be missing teeth for sure.
>
>In the real world, you would be too chicken shit to do it, so bite me.
You're the sort who talks big and never shows for their transfusion.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179976 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 08:28 |
|
"Night Spirit" <hipdale2 [at] earthlink.net> wrote in message
news:Lu1mf.1026$nm.947 [at] newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net...
> "80 Knight" <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote in message
> news:59OdnTlqo8pV_AreRVn-oA [at] rogers.com...
>> "Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
>> news:_Kclf.50670$ki.13211 [at] pd7tw2no...
>> I actually feel sorry for Anybody. He seems to be stuck in his own little
>> world where everyone is against him and 'Hollyweird' is out to get him.
>
> Yeah, we all know that it's the Canadians that are out to get us!
>
> So freaking runs from the Klingon from the great white north.
He's not the only Canadian in the group ;-)
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179977 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 08:32 |
|
<fishtacos [at] yum.net> wrote in message
news:ppbip1ltq77i6ks4jfqbfsjl4fvm5ng6t9 [at] 4ax.com...
> On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:45:38 -0500, "80 Knight"
> <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>
>><fishtacos [at] yum.net> wrote in message
>>news:tonfp11hcsb7jjoartcidvokcmg7n2jg6f [at] 4ax.com...
>>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:27:22 -0500, "80 Knight"
>>> <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>"Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
>>>>news:_Kclf.50670$ki.13211 [at] pd7tw2no...
<Snip>
>>>>>> Of course he does. Yet, I have not seen him offer one good idea on
>>>>>> how
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> improve Trek, or anything else he bitches about. Not that I read all
>>>>>> of
>>>>> his
>>>>>> rants, just the ones I stumble across.
>>>>>
>>>>> Heh heh, indeed.
>>>>> And according to "Anybody" the only way to improve Trek is the deaths
>>>>> of
>>>>> Berman and Braga 'cause they're to blame for *everything.* Oh and stop
>>>>> "Hollyweird" recycling ideas (and making them better) like the
>>>>> re-imaging
>>>>> of
>>>>> Battlestar Galactica. (IMO the best and most enjoyable Sci-fi series
>>>>> since
>>>>> B5, oh ya and season 4 of Ent)
>>>>
>>>>Tell me about it. I and a couple others have already had it out with
>>>>'Anybody' about BSG in, oddly enough, a 'Knight Rider' (yup, the show
>>>>with
>>>>the talking car :-P ) newsgroup, as that franchise is also thinking
>>>>about
>>>>making a big-screen movie, and 'Anybody' had to chirp in and tell us how
>>>>much it would suck. As for the BSG argument, I and another person asked
>>>>several questions as plain as day, yet Anybody refused to answer them
>>>>based
>>>>on the fact that I was a 'troll' and the other guy was just stupid. But,
>>>>can't win 'em all eh? I actually feel sorry for Anybody. He seems to be
>>>>stuck in his own little world where everyone is against him and
>>>>'Hollyweird'
>>>>is out to get him. But, I, you, and many others have tried to reason
>>>>with
>>>>him, only to come to the conclusion that 'Anybody' is truly 'Nobody'.
>>>>Should
>>>>he decide to engage in further mature conversation, I myself would be
>>>>happy
>>>>to do so as well, but I think he is stuck on 'playback' and will not
>>>>change.
>>>>
>>>
>>> What a pompous self-important ass you are. In the real world, you'd
>>> be missing teeth for sure.
>>
>>In the real world, you would be too chicken shit to do it, so bite me.
>
> You're the sort who talks big and never shows for their transfusion.
*yawn*. And you sound like an 'Anybody' sock-puppet. Either way, do not
presume to know me. Oh, and like I said before, bite me.
By the way......What is your problem again?
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179978 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 09:16 |
|
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 02:32:45 -0500, "80 Knight"
<80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
><fishtacos [at] yum.net> wrote in message
>news:ppbip1ltq77i6ks4jfqbfsjl4fvm5ng6t9 [at] 4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:45:38 -0500, "80 Knight"
>> <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>>
>>><fishtacos [at] yum.net> wrote in message
>>>news:tonfp11hcsb7jjoartcidvokcmg7n2jg6f [at] 4ax.com...
>>>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:27:22 -0500, "80 Knight"
>>>> <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>"Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
>>>>>news:_Kclf.50670$ki.13211 [at] pd7tw2no...
>
><Snip>
>
>>>>>>> Of course he does. Yet, I have not seen him offer one good idea on
>>>>>>> how
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> improve Trek, or anything else he bitches about. Not that I read all
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>> his
>>>>>>> rants, just the ones I stumble across.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Heh heh, indeed.
>>>>>> And according to "Anybody" the only way to improve Trek is the deaths
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> Berman and Braga 'cause they're to blame for *everything.* Oh and stop
>>>>>> "Hollyweird" recycling ideas (and making them better) like the
>>>>>> re-imaging
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> Battlestar Galactica. (IMO the best and most enjoyable Sci-fi series
>>>>>> since
>>>>>> B5, oh ya and season 4 of Ent)
>>>>>
>>>>>Tell me about it. I and a couple others have already had it out with
>>>>>'Anybody' about BSG in, oddly enough, a 'Knight Rider' (yup, the show
>>>>>with
>>>>>the talking car :-P ) newsgroup, as that franchise is also thinking
>>>>>about
>>>>>making a big-screen movie, and 'Anybody' had to chirp in and tell us how
>>>>>much it would suck. As for the BSG argument, I and another person asked
>>>>>several questions as plain as day, yet Anybody refused to answer them
>>>>>based
>>>>>on the fact that I was a 'troll' and the other guy was just stupid. But,
>>>>>can't win 'em all eh? I actually feel sorry for Anybody. He seems to be
>>>>>stuck in his own little world where everyone is against him and
>>>>>'Hollyweird'
>>>>>is out to get him. But, I, you, and many others have tried to reason
>>>>>with
>>>>>him, only to come to the conclusion that 'Anybody' is truly 'Nobody'.
>>>>>Should
>>>>>he decide to engage in further mature conversation, I myself would be
>>>>>happy
>>>>>to do so as well, but I think he is stuck on 'playback' and will not
>>>>>change.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What a pompous self-important ass you are. In the real world, you'd
>>>> be missing teeth for sure.
>>>
>>>In the real world, you would be too chicken shit to do it, so bite me.
>>
>> You're the sort who talks big and never shows for their transfusion.
>
>*yawn*. And you sound like an 'Anybody' sock-puppet. Either way, do not
>presume to know me. Oh, and like I said before, bite me.
>By the way......What is your problem again?
You're a fucking asshole. Not my problem. Yours. And like the dunce
you are, you will die a coward's death behind your keyboard someday
bragging about how much better you are than anyone else in existence.
Back under your stone, coward.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179979 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 10:14 |
|
<fishtacos [at] yum.net> wrote in message
news:99fip1lmaagrkiavvtioh6gtgnsqqc2bdg [at] 4ax.com...
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 02:32:45 -0500, "80 Knight"
> <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>
>><fishtacos [at] yum.net> wrote in message
>>news:ppbip1ltq77i6ks4jfqbfsjl4fvm5ng6t9 [at] 4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:45:38 -0500, "80 Knight"
>>> <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>><fishtacos [at] yum.net> wrote in message
>>>>news:tonfp11hcsb7jjoartcidvokcmg7n2jg6f [at] 4ax.com...
>>>>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:27:22 -0500, "80 Knight"
>>>>> <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>"Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
>>>>>>news:_Kclf.50670$ki.13211 [at] pd7tw2no...
>>
>><Snip>
>>
>>>>>>>> Of course he does. Yet, I have not seen him offer one good idea on
>>>>>>>> how
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> improve Trek, or anything else he bitches about. Not that I read
>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> his
>>>>>>>> rants, just the ones I stumble across.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Heh heh, indeed.
>>>>>>> And according to "Anybody" the only way to improve Trek is the
>>>>>>> deaths
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> Berman and Braga 'cause they're to blame for *everything.* Oh and
>>>>>>> stop
>>>>>>> "Hollyweird" recycling ideas (and making them better) like the
>>>>>>> re-imaging
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> Battlestar Galactica. (IMO the best and most enjoyable Sci-fi series
>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>> B5, oh ya and season 4 of Ent)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tell me about it. I and a couple others have already had it out with
>>>>>>'Anybody' about BSG in, oddly enough, a 'Knight Rider' (yup, the show
>>>>>>with
>>>>>>the talking car :-P ) newsgroup, as that franchise is also thinking
>>>>>>about
>>>>>>making a big-screen movie, and 'Anybody' had to chirp in and tell us
>>>>>>how
>>>>>>much it would suck. As for the BSG argument, I and another person
>>>>>>asked
>>>>>>several questions as plain as day, yet Anybody refused to answer them
>>>>>>based
>>>>>>on the fact that I was a 'troll' and the other guy was just stupid.
>>>>>>But,
>>>>>>can't win 'em all eh? I actually feel sorry for Anybody. He seems to
>>>>>>be
>>>>>>stuck in his own little world where everyone is against him and
>>>>>>'Hollyweird'
>>>>>>is out to get him. But, I, you, and many others have tried to reason
>>>>>>with
>>>>>>him, only to come to the conclusion that 'Anybody' is truly 'Nobody'.
>>>>>>Should
>>>>>>he decide to engage in further mature conversation, I myself would be
>>>>>>happy
>>>>>>to do so as well, but I think he is stuck on 'playback' and will not
>>>>>>change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> What a pompous self-important ass you are. In the real world, you'd
>>>>> be missing teeth for sure.
>>>>
>>>>In the real world, you would be too chicken shit to do it, so bite me.
>>>
>>> You're the sort who talks big and never shows for their transfusion.
>>
>>*yawn*. And you sound like an 'Anybody' sock-puppet. Either way, do not
>>presume to know me. Oh, and like I said before, bite me.
>>By the way......What is your problem again?
>
> You're a fucking asshole. Not my problem. Yours. And like the dunce
> you are, you will die a coward's death behind your keyboard someday
> bragging about how much better you are than anyone else in existence.
> Back under your stone, coward.
Wow. I am in awe of you. To think that I am the asshole, and not you, the
one who came into a conversation knowing absolutely nothing about the topic,
and started acting like a moron.
Though, for the record, I never said I was better then anyone else, just
that 'Anybody' runs from arguments when he knows he can not win them. As I
also said, you sound like a Sock-Puppet of his. If you have a problem with
me, tell me what it is and perhaps it can be resolved. If your only problem
is my un-trust of 'Anybody' then that is between him and myself, and you
need to seek out a life.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #179980 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 15:14 |
|
"Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
news:vW9mf.136607$Ph4.4167573 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> >>> Reminds me, what did the Vulcan ambassador say at the Klingon banquet?
> >>>
> >>> "Gagh me with a spoon."
> >>
> >>
> >> Well I thought it was funny. See, Vulcans don't eat with their
fingers...
> >
> >
> > That oughta make for some interesting pickup lines...I wonder if Koss
ever said to T'Pol "Want to come back to my place and watch me eat a
doughnut without picking it up?"
>
> I doubt if Vulcans eat doughnuts. They would consider the hole
> illogical.
Not all doughnuts have holes. Some are more like buns in shape. In fact,
it's sometimes hard to discern whether what one is eating is a bun or a
doughnut.
Ian
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #179982 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 18:39 |
|
>>>>>Reminds me, what did the Vulcan ambassador say at the Klingon banquet?
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> "Gagh me with a spoon."
>>>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Well I thought it was funny. See, Vulcans don't eat with their
>
> fingers...
>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > That oughta make for some interesting pickup lines...I wonder if Koss
>
> ever said to T'Pol "Want to come back to my place and watch me eat a
> doughnut without picking it up?"
>
>>>
>>> I doubt if Vulcans eat doughnuts. They would consider the hole
>>> illogical.
>
>
> Not all doughnuts have holes. Some are more like buns in shape. In fact,
> it's sometimes hard to discern whether what one is eating is a bun or a
> doughnut.
>
> Ian
You're talking to a Canadian, here. We're the world experts on
doughnuts. If it doesn't have a hole, it's a bun, not a doughnut.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #179983 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 19:36 |
|
"Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
news:njjmf.136793$Ph4.4171697 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> >>>>>Reminds me, what did the Vulcan ambassador say at the Klingon
banquet?
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> "Gagh me with a spoon."
> >>>>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Well I thought it was funny. See, Vulcans don't eat with their
> >
> > fingers...
> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > That oughta make for some interesting pickup lines...I wonder if
Koss
> >
> > ever said to T'Pol "Want to come back to my place and watch me eat a
> > doughnut without picking it up?"
> >
> >>>
> >>> I doubt if Vulcans eat doughnuts. They would consider the hole
> >>> illogical.
> >
> >
> > Not all doughnuts have holes. Some are more like buns in shape. In fact,
> > it's sometimes hard to discern whether what one is eating is a bun or a
> > doughnut.
> >
> > Ian
>
> You're talking to a Canadian, here. We're the world experts on
> doughnuts. If it doesn't have a hole, it's a bun, not a doughnut.
Especially those bluenosers where it's actually a Nova Scotia law that one
MUST go to Tim Horton's at *least* 3 times a week. I beleive him.
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #179984 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 22:58 |
|
>>>>>I doubt if Vulcans eat doughnuts. They would consider the hole
>>>>>> >>> illogical.
>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Not all doughnuts have holes. Some are more like buns in shape. In fact,
>>>> > it's sometimes hard to discern whether what one is eating is a bun or a
>>>> > doughnut.
>>>> >
>>>> > Ian
>>
>>>
>>> You're talking to a Canadian, here. We're the world experts on
>>> doughnuts. If it doesn't have a hole, it's a bun, not a doughnut.
>
>
> Especially those bluenosers where it's actually a Nova Scotia law that one
> MUST go to Tim Horton's at *least* 3 times a week. I beleive him.
Tim Horton, the patron saint of the doughnut. We worship at his
church daily.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #179985 ] |
Fr, 09 Dezember 2005 23:59 |
|
"Al Smith" <invalid [at] address.com> wrote in message
news:Q5nmf.136911$Ph4.4174614 [at] ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> >>>>>I doubt if Vulcans eat doughnuts. They would consider the hole
> >>>>>> >>> illogical.
> >>>
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Not all doughnuts have holes. Some are more like buns in shape. In
fact,
> >>>> > it's sometimes hard to discern whether what one is eating is a bun
or a
> >>>> > doughnut.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Ian
> >>
> >>>
> >>> You're talking to a Canadian, here. We're the world experts on
> >>> doughnuts. If it doesn't have a hole, it's a bun, not a doughnut.
> >
> >
> > Especially those bluenosers where it's actually a Nova Scotia law that
one
> > MUST go to Tim Horton's at *least* 3 times a week. I beleive him.
>
> Tim Horton, the patron saint of the doughnut. We worship at his
> church daily.
LOL! No doubt.....
True story of when I last flew out of Halifax; after my boss and I went
through security he says,
"Wanna coffee? I'm buy'n"
"OK," say I. We look down the hallway and no word of a lie the is 20 or so
people lined up for Tim Horton's, right in front of us is a Starbucks with
no line so we went there, as we weren't from that coast we had no fear of
being arrested.
--
Qapla'
Kweeg
Ten of Canadian Clubs in the Eeeevil Trek Cabal
http://members.shaw.ca/iksbloodoath
"Half a gallon a'scotch!" Scotty (Spectre of the Gun)
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179986 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 01:13 |
|
In article <99fip1lmaagrkiavvtioh6gtgnsqqc2bdg [at] 4ax.com>,
fishtacos [at] yum.net wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 02:32:45 -0500, "80 Knight"
> <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>
> >*yawn*. And you sound like an 'Anybody' sock-puppet. Either way, do not
> >presume to know me. Oh, and like I said before, bite me.
> >By the way......What is your problem again?
>
> You're a fucking asshole. Not my problem. Yours. And like the dunce
> you are, you will die a coward's death behind your keyboard someday
> bragging about how much better you are than anyone else in existence.
> Back under your stone, coward.
Just killfile the moron. I did and no longer see his insane dribblings,
except when someone quotes them in a reply.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179987 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 01:24 |
|
<fishtacos [at] yum.net> wrote in message
news:99fip1lmaagrkiavvtioh6gtgnsqqc2bdg [at] 4ax.com...
>
> You're a fucking asshole. Not my problem. Yours. And like the dunce
> you are, you will die a coward's death behind your keyboard someday
> bragging about how much better you are than anyone else in existence.
> Back under your stone, coward.
what a pathetic little fuckwit you are, why dont you go play in traffic, the
rest of us could do with the laugh, unlike knight though i'd prefer you
didn't bite me, the aroma of cock breath coming from your mouth is likely to
cause a serious infection to the wound
fozzi
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179988 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 01:27 |
|
"Anybody" <anybody [at] anywhere-anytime.com> wrote in message
news:101220051313234775%anybody [at] anywhere-anytime.com...
> In article <99fip1lmaagrkiavvtioh6gtgnsqqc2bdg [at] 4ax.com>,
> fishtacos [at] yum.net wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 02:32:45 -0500, "80 Knight"
> > <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
> >
> > >*yawn*. And you sound like an 'Anybody' sock-puppet. Either way, do not
> > >presume to know me. Oh, and like I said before, bite me.
> > >By the way......What is your problem again?
> >
> > You're a fucking asshole. Not my problem. Yours. And like the dunce
> > you are, you will die a coward's death behind your keyboard someday
> > bragging about how much better you are than anyone else in existence.
> > Back under your stone, coward.
>
> Just killfile the moron. I did and no longer see his insane dribblings,
> except when someone quotes them in a reply.
i would killfile the moron in the group, but then i wouldn't see any of your
posts
cheers
fozzi
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trout Movie [message #179989 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 02:24 |
|
>>>>>>>I doubt if Vulcans eat doughnuts. They would consider the hole
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> illogical.
>>>>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>>> > Not all doughnuts have holes. Some are more like buns in shape. In
>
> fact,
>
>>>>>>>> >>>> > it's sometimes hard to discern whether what one is eating is a bun
>
> or a
>
>>>>>>>> >>>> > doughnut.
>>>>>>>> >>>> >
>>>>>>>> >>>> > Ian
>>>>
>>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>>>> >>>
>>>>>> >>> You're talking to a Canadian, here. We're the world experts on
>>>>>> >>> doughnuts. If it doesn't have a hole, it's a bun, not a doughnut.
>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Especially those bluenosers where it's actually a Nova Scotia law that
>
> one
>
>>>> > MUST go to Tim Horton's at *least* 3 times a week. I beleive him.
>>
>>>
>>> Tim Horton, the patron saint of the doughnut. We worship at his
>>> church daily.
>
>
> LOL! No doubt.....
> True story of when I last flew out of Halifax; after my boss and I went
> through security he says,
> "Wanna coffee? I'm buy'n"
> "OK," say I. We look down the hallway and no word of a lie the is 20 or so
> people lined up for Tim Horton's, right in front of us is a Starbucks with
> no line so we went there, as we weren't from that coast we had no fear of
> being arrested.
> --
Starbucks. Yuck. You come-from-away types don't know your coffee.
You can't roll up the rim at Starbucks.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179991 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 03:05 |
|
On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 04:14:06 -0500, "80 Knight"
<80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
><fishtacos [at] yum.net> wrote in message
>news:99fip1lmaagrkiavvtioh6gtgnsqqc2bdg [at] 4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 02:32:45 -0500, "80 Knight"
>> <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>>
>>><fishtacos [at] yum.net> wrote in message
>>>news:ppbip1ltq77i6ks4jfqbfsjl4fvm5ng6t9 [at] 4ax.com...
>>>> On Thu, 8 Dec 2005 09:45:38 -0500, "80 Knight"
>>>> <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>><fishtacos [at] yum.net> wrote in message
>>>>>news:tonfp11hcsb7jjoartcidvokcmg7n2jg6f [at] 4ax.com...
>>>>>> On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:27:22 -0500, "80 Knight"
>>>>>> <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>"Kweeg" <kweeg [at] nospam.shaw.ca> wrote in message
>>>>>>>news:_Kclf.50670$ki.13211 [at] pd7tw2no...
>>>
>>><Snip>
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Of course he does. Yet, I have not seen him offer one good idea on
>>>>>>>>> how
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> improve Trek, or anything else he bitches about. Not that I read
>>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> his
>>>>>>>>> rants, just the ones I stumble across.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Heh heh, indeed.
>>>>>>>> And according to "Anybody" the only way to improve Trek is the
>>>>>>>> deaths
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> Berman and Braga 'cause they're to blame for *everything.* Oh and
>>>>>>>> stop
>>>>>>>> "Hollyweird" recycling ideas (and making them better) like the
>>>>>>>> re-imaging
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> Battlestar Galactica. (IMO the best and most enjoyable Sci-fi series
>>>>>>>> since
>>>>>>>> B5, oh ya and season 4 of Ent)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tell me about it. I and a couple others have already had it out with
>>>>>>>'Anybody' about BSG in, oddly enough, a 'Knight Rider' (yup, the show
>>>>>>>with
>>>>>>>the talking car :-P ) newsgroup, as that franchise is also thinking
>>>>>>>about
>>>>>>>making a big-screen movie, and 'Anybody' had to chirp in and tell us
>>>>>>>how
>>>>>>>much it would suck. As for the BSG argument, I and another person
>>>>>>>asked
>>>>>>>several questions as plain as day, yet Anybody refused to answer them
>>>>>>>based
>>>>>>>on the fact that I was a 'troll' and the other guy was just stupid.
>>>>>>>But,
>>>>>>>can't win 'em all eh? I actually feel sorry for Anybody. He seems to
>>>>>>>be
>>>>>>>stuck in his own little world where everyone is against him and
>>>>>>>'Hollyweird'
>>>>>>>is out to get him. But, I, you, and many others have tried to reason
>>>>>>>with
>>>>>>>him, only to come to the conclusion that 'Anybody' is truly 'Nobody'.
>>>>>>>Should
>>>>>>>he decide to engage in further mature conversation, I myself would be
>>>>>>>happy
>>>>>>>to do so as well, but I think he is stuck on 'playback' and will not
>>>>>>>change.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What a pompous self-important ass you are. In the real world, you'd
>>>>>> be missing teeth for sure.
>>>>>
>>>>>In the real world, you would be too chicken shit to do it, so bite me.
>>>>
>>>> You're the sort who talks big and never shows for their transfusion.
>>>
>>>*yawn*. And you sound like an 'Anybody' sock-puppet. Either way, do not
>>>presume to know me. Oh, and like I said before, bite me.
>>>By the way......What is your problem again?
>>
>> You're a fucking asshole. Not my problem. Yours. And like the dunce
>> you are, you will die a coward's death behind your keyboard someday
>> bragging about how much better you are than anyone else in existence.
>> Back under your stone, coward.
>
>Wow. I am in awe of you. To think that I am the asshole, and not you, the
>one who came into a conversation knowing absolutely nothing about the topic,
>and started acting like a moron.
>Though, for the record, I never said I was better then anyone else, just
>that 'Anybody' runs from arguments when he knows he can not win them. As I
>also said, you sound like a Sock-Puppet of his. If you have a problem with
>me, tell me what it is and perhaps it can be resolved. If your only problem
>is my un-trust of 'Anybody' then that is between him and myself, and you
>need to seek out a life.
Only a guilty person like you has to protest too much. Besides, I
told you to go hide back under your rock. You don't listen too well.
If you had any balls or intelligence, you would take it to email
between yourself and the person you are stalking and quit trying to
make this newsgroup into your own private pity party. You loser.
|
|
|
| Re: [NEWS] - Singer Considers Trek Movie [message #179992 ] |
Sa, 10 Dezember 2005 03:09 |
|
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:13:23 +1300, Anybody
<anybody [at] anywhere-anytime.com> wrote:
>In article <99fip1lmaagrkiavvtioh6gtgnsqqc2bdg [at] 4ax.com>,
>fishtacos [at] yum.net wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 9 Dec 2005 02:32:45 -0500, "80 Knight"
>> <80_knightREMOVEME [at] rogers.com> wrote:
>>
>> >*yawn*. And you sound like an 'Anybody' sock-puppet. Either way, do not
>> >presume to know me. Oh, and like I said before, bite me.
>> >By the way......What is your problem again?
>>
>> You're a fucking asshole. Not my problem. Yours. And like the dunce
>> you are, you will die a coward's death behind your keyboard someday
>> bragging about how much better you are than anyone else in existence.
>> Back under your stone, coward.
>
>Just killfile the moron. I did and no longer see his insane dribblings,
>except when someone quotes them in a reply.
Yeah, there are more than a couple of nuts in this newsgroup in my
Bozo Bin and 80_knight_who_says_nit is about to be welcomed. Like a
typical coward, when he gets called out for his BS, he acts tough,
then plays the victim, then he'll probably try to start stalking.
Cowardly Scum like him are all the same: hiding behind their keyboard
of courage.
|
|
|
Gehe zu:
aktuelle Zeit: Di Feb 7 10:39:36 CET 2012
Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,09068 Sekunden |
