| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129324 ] |
Fr, 16 September 2005 05:16 |
|
George Peatty wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 23:54:00 GMT, Mike <miker [at] rochester.rr.com> wrote:
>
>
>>You are exposing a major plot hole in the Menagerie. Pike coulda told
>>them everything they needed to know in Morse code.
>
>
> Don't think so. Pike could only do dots. No dashes. ;)
One beep = dot, two short beeps = dash....
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129325 ] |
Fr, 16 September 2005 05:17 |
|
Led4Aces wrote:
> RageForTheMachine wrote
> Maybe this post is a good place to get back to talking about Star Trek,
>
> and forget politics forever. >>>>>>>>>
>
> Putting Capt. Pike in a killfile would also be a good thing.
>
I don't disagree with that last statement.
BTW, Star Trek was a very political show, so IMHO to leave politics out
of the ST forum would be impossible.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129326 ] |
Fr, 16 September 2005 05:17 |
|
Terry wrote:
> "ToolPackinMama" <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote in message
> news:11ijm3aig7dsu56 [at] news.supernews.com...
>
>>VernonT wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Can't have it both ways, Laura. Drivel or Star Trek?
>>
>>OK, I pick Star Trek. :) How about you? :)
>
>
> Yes
>
>
OK, good for you. :)
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129328 ] |
Fr, 16 September 2005 08:05 |
|
"Led4Aces" <Led4acs [at] aol.com> wrote in message
news:1126838899.473353.214870 [at] g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> RageForTheMachine wrote
> Maybe this post is a good place to get back to talking about Star Trek,
>
> and forget politics forever. >>>>>>>>>
>
> Putting Capt. Pike in a killfile would also be a good thing.
>
Go ahead. You're now in mine.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129336 ] |
Fr, 16 September 2005 23:30 |
|
CaptainPike wrote:
> "Led4Aces" <Led4acs [at] aol.com> wrote in message
> > Putting Capt. Pike in a killfile would also be a good thing.
> >
>
> Go ahead. You're now in mine.
Please put me in yours too, Pike. Anybody who still insists on
empowering the Laura Troll at this late date is nobody I want reading
my posts.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129337 ] |
Sa, 17 September 2005 00:42 |
|
Who the f*** is Laura Troll?
Graeme wrote:
>
> CaptainPike wrote:
> > "Led4Aces" <Led4acs [at] aol.com> wrote in message
> > > Putting Capt. Pike in a killfile would also be a good thing.
> > >
> >
> > Go ahead. You're now in mine.
>
> Please put me in yours too, Pike. Anybody who still insists on
> empowering the Laura Troll at this late date is nobody I want reading
> my posts.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129341 ] |
Sa, 17 September 2005 08:53 |
|
CaptainPike wrote:
> "Led4Aces" <Led4acs [at] aol.com> wrote in message
> news:1126838899.473353.214870 [at] g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
>>RageForTheMachine wrote
>>Maybe this post is a good place to get back to talking about Star Trek,
>>
>>and forget politics forever. >>>>>>>>>
>>
>>Putting Capt. Pike in a killfile would also be a good thing.
>>
>
>
> Go ahead. You're now in mine.
>
>
LOL the hyenas devour each other. :)
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129342 ] |
Sa, 17 September 2005 08:57 |
|
Mike wrote:
> Who the f*** is Laura Troll?
LOL Yeah, who who the fuck is that, anyway? :) Why all those ppl be
hatin'? What's it all about, Alfie? :)
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129344 ] |
Sa, 17 September 2005 17:06 |
|
ToolPackinMama wrote:
> George Peatty wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 23:54:00 GMT, Mike <miker [at] rochester.rr.com>
>> wrote:
>>> You are exposing a major plot hole in the Menagerie. Pike coulda
>>> told them everything they needed to know in Morse code.
>>
>>
>> Don't think so. Pike could only do dots. No dashes. ;)
>
> One beep = dot, two short beeps = dash....
Unless he was only able to formulate thought responses in the form of 'yes'
and 'no'.
The damage was severe...
If he had been able to do more some computer might have translated a Morse
code into spoken language.
--
www.Wouter.Valentijn.name
www.zeppodunsel.nl
www.scifics.com
www.nksf.nl
liam=mail
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129345 ] |
Sa, 17 September 2005 19:04 |
|
>>Unless he was only able to formulate thought responses in the form of 'yes'
and 'no'.
>>The damage was severe...
On the starbase, McCoy indicated that his brain was undamaged, and that
he could think any thought that the others could.
..
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129346 ] |
Sa, 17 September 2005 20:08 |
|
Graeme wrote:
>>> Unless he was only able to formulate thought responses in the form
>>> of 'yes' and 'no'. The damage was severe...
>
> On the starbase, McCoy indicated that his brain was undamaged, and
> that he could think any thought that the others could.
> .
Thinking is one thing, but communicating might be something else.
--
www.Wouter.Valentijn.name
www.zeppodunsel.nl
www.scifics.com
www.nksf.nl
liam=mail
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129348 ] |
So, 18 September 2005 01:43 |
|
Wouter Valentijn wrote:
> ToolPackinMama wrote:
>
>>George Peatty wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 15 Sep 2005 23:54:00 GMT, Mike <miker [at] rochester.rr.com>
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>You are exposing a major plot hole in the Menagerie. Pike coulda
>>>>told them everything they needed to know in Morse code.
>>>
>>>
>>>Don't think so. Pike could only do dots. No dashes. ;)
>>
>>One beep = dot, two short beeps = dash....
>
>
> Unless he was only able to formulate thought responses in the form of 'yes'
> and 'no'.
> The damage was severe...
Hmm, true...
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129356 ] |
So, 18 September 2005 05:06 |
|
>Who the f*** is Laura Troll?
Well it certainly isn't me. I'm the most important person on this
newsgroup!
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129357 ] |
So, 18 September 2005 05:09 |
|
>Who the f*** is Laura Troll?
Well it certainly isn't me. I'm the most important person on this
newsgroup!
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129371 ] |
Mo, 19 September 2005 00:38 |
|
"Brad Filippone" <al019 [at] chebucto.ns.ca> wrote in message
news:dg9jv4$eb$1 [at] News.Dal.Ca...
> ToolPackinMama (laura [at] lauragoodwin.org) wrote:
> : CaptainPike wrote:
>
> : > you stupid whore.
>
> : Oh dearie me, someone on the internet who disagrees with me called me a
> : naughty name. Gee, that's tough to take.
>
> And it's never happened before, has it, Laura? :)
>
> Isn't it interesting though, that you can state your point of view with
> little or no belittling or name-calling, but your opponent can't? Even if
> you WERE all the things that he called you (which you're not!) how does it
> have any bearing on whether or not you are correct in your views? The
> petty insults just show his childish nature, and make him easier to
> dismiss.
>
> Brad
Actually, brad, you are incorrect here. I will reprint Laura's
original post that oh so deservedly received such a response from me. And
don't bother, I've already killfiled you too.
>Bush has lied and/or been less than up-front a few notable times (WMD
in
Iraq?), and our national good-will internationally has been ruined...not
to mention mind-boggling amounts of money wasted, and patriotic lives of
decent young people have been lost forever as a result of his callous
ineptitude.
Furthermore, he has generally demonstrated a complete absence of innate
leadership capability. Guy's an obvious, apparent, errant moron. Bush
fails to show any signs of even average intelligence. That alone is
disgraceful, but that he supposedly represents us to the world makes it
doubly disgraceful.
I say, impeach President Bush for his many failures as our nation's
leader. And this time, _make it stick_. Clinton was a lightweight
next to GW Bush, who is a full on bull-moose loony, and as such a man
who is in no way a fit president.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129372 ] |
Mo, 19 September 2005 00:21 |
|
I disagree with everything Laura says here, that doesn't mean I get to
call her a slut.
>
> Actually, brad, you are incorrect here. I will reprint Laura's
> original post that oh so deservedly received such a response from me. And
> don't bother, I've already killfiled you too.
>
> >Bush has lied and/or been less than up-front a few notable times (WMD
> in
> Iraq?), and our national good-will internationally has been ruined...not
> to mention mind-boggling amounts of money wasted, and patriotic lives of
> decent young people have been lost forever as a result of his callous
> ineptitude.
>
> Furthermore, he has generally demonstrated a complete absence of innate
> leadership capability. Guy's an obvious, apparent, errant moron. Bush
> fails to show any signs of even average intelligence. That alone is
> disgraceful, but that he supposedly represents us to the world makes it
> doubly disgraceful.
>
> I say, impeach President Bush for his many failures as our nation's
> leader. And this time, _make it stick_. Clinton was a lightweight
> next to GW Bush, who is a full on bull-moose loony, and as such a man
> who is in no way a fit president.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #129388 ] |
Mo, 19 September 2005 08:25 |
|
in article 1126976649.784687.39500 [at] g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com, Graeme at
graemecree [at] aol.com wrote on 9/17/05 10:04 AM:
>>> Unless he was only able to formulate thought responses in the form of 'yes'
> and 'no'.
>>> The damage was severe...
>
> On the starbase, McCoy indicated that his brain was undamaged, and that
> he could think any thought that the others could.
> .
>
Blast medicine anyway.
--
You Can't Stop the Signal
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #135464 ] |
Mo, 19 September 2005 21:10 |
|
"CaptainPike" <CaptainPike [at] ev1.net> wrote in message
news:11irk5k58dsdcba [at] corp.supernews.com...
> Furthermore, he has generally demonstrated a complete absence of innate
> leadership capability. Guy's an obvious, apparent, errant moron. Bush
> fails to show any signs of even average intelligence.
However, iminently? more intelligent than you appear to be.
Some scientists on Star Trek are pretty dumb compared to
others but all of them can read a script and appear smarter
than any of us.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #135469 ] |
Mo, 19 September 2005 22:30 |
|
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005 15:38:00 -0700, "CaptainPike"
<CaptainPike [at] ev1.net> wrote:
>Bush has lied and/or been less than up-front a few notable times (WMD in
>Iraq?), and our national good-will internationally has been ruined...not
>to mention mind-boggling amounts of money wasted, and patriotic lives of
>decent young people have been lost forever as a result of his callous
>ineptitude.
>
>Furthermore, he has generally demonstrated a complete absence of innate
>leadership capability. Guy's an obvious, apparent, errant moron. Bush
>fails to show any signs of even average intelligence. That alone is
>disgraceful, but that he supposedly represents us to the world makes it
>doubly disgraceful.
>
>I say, impeach President Bush for his many failures as our nation's
>leader. And this time, _make it stick_. Clinton was a lightweight
>next to GW Bush, who is a full on bull-moose loony, and as such a man
>who is in no way a fit president.
>
I agree.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #135471 ] |
Mo, 19 September 2005 23:48 |
|
VernonT wrote:
> "CaptainPike" <CaptainPike [at] ev1.net> wrote in message
> news:11irk5k58dsdcba [at] corp.supernews.com...
>> Furthermore, he has generally demonstrated a complete absence of
>> innate leadership capability. Guy's an obvious, apparent, errant
>> moron. Bush fails to show any signs of even average intelligence.
>
> However, iminently? more intelligent than you appear to be.
> Some scientists on Star Trek are pretty dumb compared to
> others but all of them can read a script and appear smarter
> than any of us.
Actors you mean.
The scientists are characters they play.
--
www.Wouter.Valentijn.name
www.zeppodunsel.nl
www.scifics.com
www.nksf.nl
liam=mail
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #135481 ] |
Di, 20 September 2005 06:57 |
|
MrSpook wrote:
>>I say, impeach President Bush for his many failures as our nation's
>>leader. And this time, _make it stick_. Clinton was a lightweight
>>next to GW Bush, who is a full on bull-moose loony, and as such a man
>>who is in no way a fit president.
>>
>
>
> I agree.
Thank you.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #135485 ] |
Di, 20 September 2005 07:13 |
|
Wouter Valentijn wrote:
> VernonT wrote:
>
>>"CaptainPike" <CaptainPike [at] ev1.net> wrote in message
>>news:11irk5k58dsdcba [at] corp.supernews.com...
>>
>>>Furthermore, he has generally demonstrated a complete absence of
>>>innate leadership capability. Guy's an obvious, apparent, errant
>>>moron. Bush fails to show any signs of even average intelligence.
Ah, yes, that was me, FWIW.
>>However, iminently?
Huh? Is iminently even a word? What does such a word mean in the
context cited above? Anyone?
>> more intelligent than you appear to be.
Well, at least I know enough to start a sentance with a capital letter.
I learned that in grade school.
>>Some scientists on Star Trek are pretty dumb compared to
>>others but all of them can read a script and appear smarter
>>than any of us.
So? Bush is still a shamefully obvious moron.
> Actors you mean.
> The scientists are characters they play.
Correct.
BTW:
http://www.armchairsubversive.com/
http://www.redmorals.com/
So... Kirk/Spock in '08! Seriously! :)
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #135487 ] |
Di, 20 September 2005 11:17 |
|
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 01:13:21 -0400, ToolPackinMama
<laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote:
>Wouter Valentijn wrote:
>> VernonT wrote:
>>
>>>"CaptainPike" <CaptainPike [at] ev1.net> wrote in message
>>>news:11irk5k58dsdcba [at] corp.supernews.com...
>>>
>>>>Furthermore, he has generally demonstrated a complete absence of
>>>>innate leadership capability. Guy's an obvious, apparent, errant
>>>>moron. Bush fails to show any signs of even average intelligence.
>
>Ah, yes, that was me, FWIW.
>
>>>However, iminently?
>
>Huh? Is iminently even a word?
What, nobody is allowed to fuck up spelling a word?
> What does such a word mean in the
>context cited above? Anyone?
Come on now, stop fronting, you know what he meant.
>
>>> more intelligent than you appear to be.
>
>Well, at least I know enough to start a sentance with a capital letter.
> I learned that in grade school.
Pity that you can't spell SENTENCE.
>
>>>Some scientists on Star Trek are pretty dumb compared to
>>>others but all of them can read a script and appear smarter
>>>than any of us.
>
>So? Bush is still a shamefully obvious moron.
Can't argue with that, and I won't.
>
>> Actors you mean.
>> The scientists are characters they play.
>
>Correct.
>
>BTW:
>
>http://www.armchairsubversive.com/
>
>http://www.redmorals.com/
>
>So... Kirk/Spock in '08! Seriously! :)
Prolly not... but no less ludicrious than the morons we'll be
presented with.
-LMB
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #135493 ] |
Di, 20 September 2005 18:16 |
|
Mike wrote:
]]
I disagree with everything Laura says here, that doesn't mean I get to
call her a slut.
]]
Yawn. It beats me how people can complain that Enterprise is cancelled
because now they'll have to watch (gasp!) reruns, but they can re-run
this same argument over and over, virtually word for word, hundreds of
times in the last 5 years, without ever getting tired of it.
Maybe it appeals to people's inner child in a way that Enterprise
doesn't.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #135502 ] |
Mi, 21 September 2005 06:50 |
|
Louis M. Brown wrote:
>>So... Kirk/Spock in '08! Seriously! :)
>
>
>
> Prolly not... but no less ludicrious than the morons we'll be
> presented with.
There we agree.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #135511 ] |
Mi, 21 September 2005 21:03 |
|
After I was trying to be nice to you!
If you saw the post, you'll know that my sentences were
started with capial letters. Would you really want everyone
to point out your flaws, major AND minor? I think not.
And most Americans would like their political people to be more
like them than the elite thinking asses that inhabit DC.
So if GWB sounds like an everyday American, so be it.
And where was your reference to Star Trek? DS
"ToolPackinMama" <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote in message
news:M6udnZ6qMMf0B7LeRVn-iA [at] comcast.com...
>> Actors you mean.
>> The scientists are characters they play.
Correct.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #135515 ] |
Mi, 21 September 2005 22:57 |
|
What the hell are you talking about Sir? I've never heard what I said,
said before. And besides, when attacks like this happen to Laura, or
anybody else whose generally a good person, there had better be a
"rerun" of the counterpoint. And so, here's my rerun:
Laura's wrong about Bush IMO but she's still a stand up lady and doesn't
deserve to be called a slut.
When people decend to that I don't even want them standing up for what I
believe in.
Graeme wrote:
>
> Mike wrote:
> ]]
> I disagree with everything Laura says here, that doesn't mean I get to
> call her a slut.
> ]]
>
> Yawn. It beats me how people can complain that Enterprise is cancelled
> because now they'll have to watch (gasp!) reruns, but they can re-run
> this same argument over and over, virtually word for word, hundreds of
> times in the last 5 years, without ever getting tired of it.
>
> Maybe it appeals to people's inner child in a way that Enterprise
> doesn't.
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #135522 ] |
Do, 22 September 2005 03:10 |
|
Mike wrote:
> Laura's wrong about Bush IMO but she's still a stand up lady and doesn't
> deserve to be called a slut.
>
> When people decend to that I don't even want them standing up for what I
> believe in.
Thank you.
Your Trekkie pal,
Laura
|
|
|
| Re: LOL... YES! [message #150061 ] |
Do, 20 Oktober 2005 15:50 |
|
"ToolPackinMama" <laura [at] lauragoodwin.org> wrote in message
news:11icejigrogj1d5 [at] news.supernews.com...
> ToolPackinMama wrote:
> > Karl Johanson wrote:
> >
> >> With Kirk having had confirmed sexuals relations with 2 women, one of
> >> whom was his wife
>
> The other was in effect a rapist. Deela (Wink Of An Eye) kidnapped
> Kirk, and finally coaxed him into bed with a threat of death - after he
> already made it plain he wanted no part of her desperate plan. BTW, he
> also made it plain that he was not in any way on her side, or to any
> degree sympathetic... and for the tenderhearted and broadminded Kirk,
> that's saying a lot!
Oh ya Deela.
Yup we all remember that well when Kirk got back to the starbase and filed a
sexual discrimination suit against them for forcing him to go on missions
with evil women who forced their wills on him.
What do you smoke "mama" ?
AMUN
|
|
|
